CTV News | Harper 'always' said he'd go to Copenhagen: Prentice

Top Stories -   

Harper 'always' said he'd go to Copenhagen: Prentice

Viewer

CTV News Video

Question period: NDP question the government
NDP Leader Jack Layton slams the government on the PM's lack of leadership over the handling of climate change and Copenhagen.
CTV National News: Roger Smith on the wrap up
At the end of the Commonwealth summit in Port-of-Spain, Prime Minister Stephen Harper called for negotiations in Copenhagen that will produce realistic targets, and insisted countries must do their share in cutting greenhouse gases.
CTV's Question Period: Jim Prentice, minister
Facing tough criticism for letting the U.S. lead on all climate measures, Environment Minister Jim Prentice said the government is just trying to 'harmonize' efforts.
CTV News Channel: John Bennett, Sierra Club
The executive director of Sierra Club Canada says progress has been made during the Commonwealth summit, but unless Canada takes domestic action on the climate, it will be meaningless.
CTV News Channel: Roger Smith from Trinidad
Canada was not a lead player in the contact group that brokered the climate deal at the Commonwealth, but will support the group's call for a binding agreement in Copenhagen.
CTV National News: Roger Smith on the agreement
Commonwealth leaders announced a breakthrough plan to help developing nations tackle climate change, but as climate talks heated up, Prime Minister Stephen Harper's reaction appeared quite cool.

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(42)

Photos

Slideshow image

View Larger Image

Selected Comment

I agree that the PM has been and is correct to trod carefully on environmental ground... let's make sure that what happens at Copenhagen or in any other environmental agreement is right for all Canadians, not just for the Dippers and the Libs...that's leadership!

duane sharp

Harper 'always' said he'd go to Copenhagen: Prentice

talking about
Harper 'always' said he'd go to Copenhagen: Prentice

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Sun. Nov. 29 2009 10:11 PM ET

Environment Minister Jim Prentice says the prime minister "always" planned to go to Copenhagen if a critical mass of world leaders attended, answering criticism that Stephen Harper was just following U.S. President Barack Obama.

"The prime minister always said that he would go to Copenhagen if there was critical mass of world leaders who were going there for the leaders' session, which is at the end of the Copenhagen conference," Prentice told CTV's Question Period on Sunday.

Prentice also made a point of saying that Obama -- unlike Harper -- had yet to announce whether he would be attending the leaders' meeting.

"That's the session where the leaders will be there, that's the critical session, and the prime minister is in fact saying he's going there and the president hasn't," Prentice said.

Obama will attend Day 3 of the Dec. 7-18 conference, while the leaders' segment is slated for the final two days.

Opposition critics had hammered away at the Conservatives for taking a passive wait-and-see approach to Copenhagen, rather than a more active role.

As recently as Wednesday, Ottawa had indicated the prime minister would not be travelling to the Danish capital for the international climate conference. Harper said in the House of Commons that he would only attend "if there is a meeting of all major leaders."

Obama then announced he would attend, along with China's Premier Wen Jaibo. Harper then followed suit.

Politicians from at least 65 countries are set to meet in Denmark to come up with a new climate change agreement that would replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.

"These are tough negotiations and we're going to make sure that we're there, that we're well positioned, and that we have good people at the table, and Canada will be well represented at Copenhagen," said Prentice.

Prentice said the government has no plans to change its goals, which he explained includes a 20 per cent reduction in emissions by 2020 compared to 2006 levels. That roughly matches the U.S. targets -- reducing emissions 17 per cent below 2005 levels.

"That is what we believe is a realistic and very ambitious target for our country," Prentice said.

He was responding to criticism from United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon, who criticized Canada's climate change goals and said it should be setting an example for the world because it will host the G8 and G20 summits in Ontario next year.

"There's many areas of this where Canada has been in front for several years," said Prentice. "We're working together with the Americans on a continental basis to make sure that this works, that we have a cap-and-trade system."

He also confirmed Canada would contribute to the $10 billion fund created Saturday by the Commonwealth countries to help fund nations at low sea level who are most threatened by climate change, which could lead to them becoming completely submerged.

He said there is not yet a firm amount as to how much Canada will contribute.

"In general terms, if you consider Canada is responsible for two per cent of the world's emissions you can quantify (the amount) in that range of several hundred million dollars," he said.

John Bennett, senior policy advisor to the Sierra Club of Canada, said that even with this investment, Canada has still made little progress.

"Unless Canada is actually prepared to make some domestic action that's real, it's pretty well meaningless," Bennett told CTV News Channel.

Canada has thrown away an opportunity to take the lead and show the U.S. what it should do, Bennett said.

"The U.S. is talking about a hard cap on industry, which is an absolute limit on the number of emissions that can come from an industry," he said. "In Canada you have a soft cap on intensity targets, which allow emissions to continue to grow."

He said Canada is postponing the inevitable, and will eventually have to do something to fight climate change.

A new poll released Sunday found that 62 per cent of 1,000 Canadians surveyed felt that a climate change deal should be one of the top priorities at the Copenhagen summit.

The Canadian Press Harris-Decima poll found that three quarters of Europeans and just 53 per cent of Americans felt the same way.

Comments are now closed for this story

simon
said
0 0

Environment Minister Jim Prentice says the prime minister "always" planned to go to Copenhagen if a critical mass of world leaders attended, answering criticism that Stephen Harper was just following U.S. President Barack Obama. UNQUOTE. The PM "always" planned NOT to GO if there was No critical Mass. Since the US and China made up that critical mass, Harper decided to follow Obama. Harper is a Follower, Not a Leader!!!

Portes
said
0 0

I still have my doubts whether Mr. Harper should go or not as I am not infavour with the climate change nonsense, however having said that may be he can make some deals with other nations for our goods and services, then I would say the trip is worthwhile, other wise it is a waste of taxpayers money and I am a Conservative, so Liberals you see we Conservatives do take our own to task and are not afraid to do so. Democracy at work

Red X
said
0 0

Mr. Prentice is telling a lie on behalf of Harpy. The reality is the Cons are not going to do anything and spend their time pointing to the Liberals OR U$ Prez. The truth is that they will do little as they have under Rona Ambrose: another Environment Minister from Alberta...


duane sharp
said
0 0

I agree that the PM has been and is correct to trod carefully on environmental ground... let's make sure that what happens at Copenhagen or in any other environmental agreement is right for all Canadians, not just for the Dippers and the Libs...that's leadership!

HotAir
said
0 0

Please learn about Climategate.


Adel Hay
said
0 0

I learned most Global Warming statistics have proven to be exaggerated and manipulated the numbers I so strongly believed in so I have quit the Liberal party and consider myself an independent.


Doug @ BC
said
0 0

I'm' actually glad he went there,in spite of the fact that I have yet to be impressed by ANY of the plans to deal with the climate change that MAY be coming. Though I'm still a bit of a skeptic, I am leaving myself room to be open to the idea that clean energy is a good thing, climate change or not. I will say though, that I hope Mr.Harper does NOT allow himself to be pushed around the way Dion and his bunch of wimps were in Kyoto. If they had negotiated a sensble deal then,this would not be an issue now. Even the most left wing, bleeding heart social engineers in the crowd surely must realize Canada got screwed at Kyoto. I do not see that as an excuse not to do something on this file, but it's only right to acknowledge that the Liberals made things a lot tougher for Harper. They signed a bad deal to make themselves look good,did nothing for several years,then,after hearing from the voters,expected Harper to do their dirty work. Is he doing nothing.Well,now China and India are at least talking about participating.The USA is talking about targets very similar to those proposed by Harper,provinces are moving on clean energy projects that work in each of their jurisdictions,rather than waiting for a national concensus that will likely never come.Those are modest steps that certainly match the tepid response we have from the really big emitters. Sending truck loads of money to foreign nations will do nothing for the environment.Especially in the absence of real emission cuts by the worlds biggest polluters.Mr.Harper IS leading,by standing firm,and demanding a sensible deal and refusing to commit to one that will impoversih Canadians even further,and do nothing to improve the environment. Obama will do the same thing in the USA.


George
said
0 0

Prove it! Can't, eh? Just like the Hillier-MacKay-Colvin 'disagreement of FACT'. Spin it everyway to your advantage as you see it at the time is the Conservative Harper Mantra! End result is that Canadians will never really know the TRUTH if he was or wasn't unless the lies, deceit, self-serving processes, illusion and secrecy is ended and total gov't openness and transparency becomes the RULE OF THE DAY! I dearly do hope to see that in my lifetime but not with Harper, Ignatieff or Layton.....they're all into it for their own power-play instead of HUMBLY REPRESENTING CANADIAN CITIZEN'S WISHES !


geo
said
0 0

Harper is doing far more for a country that creates only 2% of the CO2 problem in the world. What would be the point of going if the U.S. and China's leaders don't go?These two countries along with India make up the majority of the climate change problem.Without their leaders showing some concern with their CO2 levels Canada's less than 2% would do nothing to solving this global issue. Obama and Jaibo may actually do something to reduce their levels of CO2 and Harper may have influence in what they do.Those concern should applaud this move by the leaders instead of continually nitpicking at small points, and think of the results this move can make to the conference.


Jim: Al Gore Vs. Jesus
said
0 0

Typical socialist policy tax more from the people and give it to someone else. No countries are going to be to be flooded. The rainbow that appeared after Noah's ark was Gods promise to the world it would never be flooded again so you can be believe Al Gore or Jesus.


Sara Palin Alaska
said
0 0

Obama goes to every conference to avoid questions at home about the economy.


Aman Ethiopian
said
0 0

10 billion dollars could feed a lot of starving kids and save a lot of death and pain. The money should go to credible causes not idiot political schemes about the end of the world and only tax transfers can save us.


ouifyg
said
0 0

This is why I am always baffled when conservative supporters tout Harper as a strong leader. He always has this wait and see approach in international politics. I understand that in some cases that can be necessary, but it is also important for our Canadian leaders to stand up for our Canadian values and make them heard on the world stage. Harper only does what the rest of the crowd is doing. Where is the strength in that?


Rider Fan
said
0 0

The Liberals wanted Harper to go to force him to miss the Grey Cup


Wendy
said
0 0

This government sure like to throw away our tax dollars.


Tony
said
0 0

I was reading an article yesterday on MSM (Mainstream Media) "Polar Bear Eating Their Young Due To Climate Change". To say the least I was flabergasted at why such nonsense was published; nowhere in the arcticle was there any scientific proof, just some so-called experts think so. But, I have yet to find an article on MSM about emails controversy and possible frauds and manipulation of data surrounding Climate Research University (CRU) or Climategate. I am not into conspiracy theory, but my eyes are wide open now .... and it seemed that government, UN, IPCC, scientists, and MSM are all pushing global warming regardless of any concerns and surpressing any dissents. Science is now in bed with politicans and special interest groups, who manipulate it to further their agenda. I can no longer trust any data and what those scientists say, just as I don't trust the politicans. If the science of Global Warming is irrefutable, let it stands to scrutiny; that is what REAL science is. Newton, Da Vinci, Corpernicus and great scientists of the past challenged the establishments and were silenced ... here in the 21st century we are not that much different.


Huntley Haverstock
said
0 0

This government has been working tirelessly to sabotage the environmental movement. I hope we're kicked out of the Commonwealth, and I hope we're condemned for our record on pollution. If Canada wants to be a world leader it will only happen by action, not hollow rhetoric. Shame on this government.


Don Blakley, Ottawa
said
0 0

I liked the PM better on global warming when he believed it was a socialist plot!! Humankind occupies about 12% of the land mass of the globe and if the oceans are considered, about 4% of the planet. How can anyone seriously believe human action is warming the planet, particularly when we know very little about the part played by the oceans in scrubbing and capturing CO2, and the influence of sunspot activity on climate.In regards to a report from the C'Wealth meetingCTV said some of the less well off members of the C'Wealth live in low lying areas and are concerned that sea level increases caused by global warming would innundate their lands. Sorry, the report has it backwards, what they are concerned about is that they wont be innundated by waves of cash coming from the richer members of the C'Wealth guilted by Europe and the UN into believing in man made global warming. Finally, if what has turned up in the pirated e-mails from CRU had been about malfiesance in medical research instead of the sacred global warming, the media in Canada would have been all over it like a tent. Since with the exception of most notably the National Post they haven't been, one is left to assume they have drunk heavily of the Coolaid produced by the IPCC, Al Gore and D. Suzuki.


allan
said
0 0

I am disappointed that Harper has been sucked in to giving our money to useless countries, who will steal, pilfer, hide the money in other banks.I never thought harper would bow down to the UN and Common--Wealth.The just lost a conservative voter here!


Ken - Calgary
said
0 0

LIAR! Harper said right from the beginning "I'm only going if they are going". Wow... great LEADERSHIP, you pathetic SHEEP of a PM!


Robin
said
0 0

Duane Sharp? I think not. Harper and his band of high school graduates have yet to show ANY leadership on Canada's environmental file. If they did, why is Canada listed as the WORST polluter of greenhouse gas emissions in the world? Under Obama's leadership, even the US has pulled ahead of Canada. Harper, the noble environmentalist?

clearlyc
said
0 0

Proof he's a follower not a leader--- "...he "always" planned to go to Copenhagen if a critical mass of world leaders attended..."You're not doing the world any good if you have to wait for other people to step up first. So much for leadership.

MARG MM
said
0 0

Once again the media, along with the Liberals, spin the story to their liking. PM Harper DID say he would attend providing that other leaders critical to the conference attended. There would have been no reason to attend otherwise. Once the US and China commited, then it was a given that PM Harper would attend. Hopefully reason will prevail, and there won't be any aggreements like Koyoto, that did nothing except make the Liberals look like they were doing something. I feel confident that the Conservatives are on the right track, and have a plan in place to curb emmissions. The fact is that all countries must be on board as Canada does not have a protective barrier around it, so unless all participate, what is the point?

Carol Embarassed in Toronto
said
0 0

I am so embarssed to have a Prime Minister going lending credibility to this Global Warming farce.

BCDarr
said
0 0

Two words: Flip Flop

reece
said
0 0

I've always said that Harper would do whatever Bush does...now it seems that he'll only go to Copenhagen if Obama does. Plagerizing of speeches (twice) isn't the only thing Harper hacks. Do you guys have any ORIGINAL ideas what to do? Did you read the job description of PM before you filled in the application? It's about being a LEADER and not parotting what others are saying. NOBODY said it was an easy job. There's nothing stopping you from resigning, Mr Harper. In fact, since only a minority of Canadians dared vote for you, you'd have the support of the majority if you did so. You are in way to deep.


Mike-Edmonton
said
0 0

Only reason he is going is to sabotage the environmental movement. In the process he will show what a truely jackass he is.


John E
said
0 0

All I have to say about this is BS! He would never, never, never, never have gone. Obama going was the deciding factor on Harper going and Jim Prentice knows it.


heartyone
said
0 0

If I were Mr. Harper I would not attend unless other leaders of major industrialized countries were also committed to go. Why should Canada go when they are not there then we look weak. Decisions depend on the major players being there. The vast majority of minor players can say all they want but their voices don't matter. Canada is a major player and I'm glad Mr. Prentice and Mr. Harper will be the ones representing us.


I. M. Wright
said
0 0

It's a CORPORATE-socialist plot. Chicago Climate Exchange is owned by Al Gore and Goldman-Sachs bank. They'll get rich by clipping every carbon trade.No should be profiting or else they will encourage pollution just so they can profit from "environmentalism."


Linda in Vancouver
said
0 0

How pompous,arrogant,seflf rightous and ridiculous the people who say Canada "should lead the world" on this issue are beginning to sound to me. Get real people.You greatly overestimate the importance,or the influence of Canada on almost every major issue of the day.You are probably the same self centred people who think Canadians laws should apply to Canadians,no matter whose country they are visiting. China,India,and the USA are now talking about their comittments.That's a whole lot more than they were doing when Kyoto took place.The USA can influence China and India.Canada has no such ability.Our puny little market is of no real interest to any of themIf North America can drag even one of the world's biggest polluters into an emission agreement,that alone will be more useful to climat change than even shutting down our entire counrty. Harper is playing this brilliantly.While I would like to be seeing things happen a lot more quickly,he has out waited a Bush administration who wanted nothing to do with even talking about the issue.Now,he has a chance to get the USA and Obama on his side,and put real pressure on Asia to come to the table with some positive actions over there too.Only time will tell for sure,but I wouldn't count out the possibility that Harper get a better deal for Canada.I know it's a bit slow,but,"haste makes waste",doesn't it Mr.Dion? If there is an agreement that we can live up to, and that leaves more money in the pockets of Canadians,the time we waited will be well worth it.


Ontario Taxpayer
said
0 0

I am happy that the PM is going to Copenhagen to discuss the issue of Climate Change. My question is "what exactly are they going to discuss now that Climate Gate has gained a head of steam and it seems that all the data we have all been fed wrt climate change has been skewed and adjusted to fit the climate panic du jour?"


Wes
said
0 0

Dont bother going..... why would he when global warming climate change was killed on saturday. Get educated about Climate gate. Google CRU hack, read...... hopefully the leaders discuss that they (and we) were all taken for a couple decades.... or are they in on it too? Get informed people. The U.K is releasing it to the media in the coming days......


LM in AB
said
0 0

I know to run sucessfull buisness you have to be very efficent with your time and decisive.For instance I don't commit to meetings where I know hard lower level debate and decisions are not going to be made.I delegate this to very good people to separate the BS first.Should serious questions and debate with actual final influential desision makers present, I attend.I kind of like Harps don't waste my time I'm a busy man style, He is a busy PM.Would we rather he commits blindly and wastes his time.?The headline would then be HARPER WASTES TIME IN COPENHAGEN AS MOST WORLD LEADERS NOT PRESENT!!Give it a rest please and try and take the blinders off once in a while.


annie
said
0 0

Im am somewhat confident that Mr. Harper woun't let Canada get pulled into an agreement that doesn't benifit us. If we don't get credit for our hundreds of millions of CO2 elimination trees, our low population (350/400 percent less than India/China) and our advanced technology them Mr. Harper is commiting political suicide.I expect Canada, and perhaps alone against the world, to lead us out of this global warming fiasco. I expect Canada to be much stronger after these meetings and be a leader in technology and innovation, not encumbered by silly restictions or silly ideas.Thank your lucky stars Iggy isn't leading us into this mess, just think of the outcome them. Just tell us what to do and we agree.It's a great time to be Canadian.


Ivan
said
0 0

lol - as Dolly says, "The sky is green and the grass is blue" Let's watch the thumbs up/down switch radically as soon those 90 or so Cons. party hacks read this story.


TVic
said
0 0

Yep, these neo-cons sure know how to work the revisionist history thing. You can fool some of the people most of the time but...


Rocky
said
0 0

So, CTV, you're willing to let the word ClimateGate be uttered, but won't tolerate any criticism of you choice of story or spin. Is that "always", or just sometimes?


pma
said
0 0

It would be prudent to have "climate gate" on the agenda to actually see what facts stick. I am not in favour of anything GREEN costing coomon folk more. GREEN is and should be cheaper. It must create jobs and not lose jobs. Canada can simply do better environmentally starting with our borrowed Green Building Council recognizing companies that simply use less materials, thus less energy without expense to quality and durability. Harper is wise to attend and listen but no more.


Richard in Ontario
said
0 0

Surely the people on here that are saying that the Conservatives haven't done anything about climate change are not supporters of the Liebral party.. That party that signed the Kyoto accord and then did absolutely nothing in 12 years and saw the levels of emissions increase by about 25 %. These people should not under any circumstances have the gall to call anyone a liar. Remember Chretien, "I will scrap the GST" and McGuinty, "I won't raise your taxes".. Mr Harper will, I'm sure do what is best for Canada, despite what his detractors have to say.


JP in BC
said
0 0

WHat a bunch- Harper is not man enough to speak for himself so he gets his puppies to speak for him -He has made Canada the laughing stock of the world-We were well respected before him and his band of followers lead the country down and will take a real leader to get our name back-Harper shoudl stay home in the future- or better for the country retire Call an election


Chris
said
0 0

Still too many socialo-communist libs in here!!


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz