Top Stories -   

Insurgents control most of Kandahar province: report

Slideshow image

View Larger Image

Font-size: Bigger  Smaller  Share Share Print Print Comments Comments(8)

The Associated Press

Date: Wednesday Nov. 25, 2009 2:46 PM ET

KANDAHAR, Afghanistan — A wedding was called off because international troops killed the groom. A suicide bomber blew himself up in front of a police patrol. An old woman was beaten by the Taliban after she tried to stop them from taking her son.

And all of this happened in just two weeks in the same place -- Kandahar.

The fight for Kandahar, Afghanistan's second largest city, shows some of the biggest hurdles faced by the U.S. as it tries to implement a strategy of winning over the ordinary people of Afghanistan.

Kandahar, a city of an estimated 800,000 people in the south, is an important piece in the battle for Afghanistan, and losing control of it would be a huge blow to the coalition.

The city -- and the outlying province with the same name -- will be a focus of the additional buildup of tens of thousands of troops which President Barack Obama is expected to order for Afghanistan.

A senior military official said Wednesday that any troop increase approved by the president would likely be deployed to the country's east and south, where Taliban forces have a strong foothold. The military is particularly interested in improving security in Kandahar, which is regarded as the "spiritual centre" of anti-U.S. forces.

By some accounts, including that of military officials, religious insurgents already control most of the 17 districts in Kandahar province. Kandahar was the headquarters of Taliban leader Mullah Omar, and the presence of Taliban there is growing.

The outgoing NATO commander for southern Afghanistan told The Associated Press that troops need to secure the exits and entrances to Kandahar city itself if the provincial capital is to be protected from infiltration and an eventual Taliban takeover.

"Will Kandahar fall? Every two or three weeks people tell me Kandahar will fall. I think the way forward is to secure the approaches to Kandahar city," said Dutch Maj. Gen. Mart C. De Kruif.

But the strength of the insurgents is only part of the problem. The other part is the local people's mistrust of the U.S. and the Afghan government with which it is partnered. Without trust, the residents cannot be counted on to tip off authorities to the militants' presence.

"Progress is hindered by the dual threat of a resilient insurgency and a crisis of confidence in the government and the international coalition," said Obama's top commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, in an August report.

McChrystal, who is asking for thousands more soldiers, has warned that the war can be lost unless the U.S. and the Afghan government win back the trust and support of ordinary Afghans. But in Kandahar, the U.S. is fighting an overwhelming belief that the war is aimed at ethnic Pashtuns, who are the backbone of the Taliban and who dominate in the south and the east of the country where the insurgency and military action are fiercest.

"Why is it that all the killing is being done of Pashtuns? Not all Pashtuns are Taliban but that is what they (coalition) think. I am not government and I am not Taliban but I am suffering," says Naqib, whose cousin was shot and killed at the end of October when a NATO patrol fired at the car he was driving. Also killed in the incident were two women, and a 2-year-old child.

Naqib's cousin Habib Rahman was to have been married the next day. The two men -- cousins, best friends and business partners -- had decided to marry the same day. Naqib postponed his wedding and Habib's fiance "hasn't eaten since Habib's death. It is like she is dead too," he said earlier this month.

Officials said the incident is still under investigation.

United Nations figures show insurgents cause twice as many deaths as pro-government forces. Between January and September this year, the U.N. reported insurgents killed 1,862 civilians, while pro-government forces, including international and Afghan soldiers, killed 419.

But for 6-year-old Samina, who hid behind her father's arm, cracking tiny bubbles with her gum, the statistics meant little. Her mother was among those in the car that was killed.

"What do I tell my daughter? That life is better because the international troops are here?" asked Hajji Mohammed, her father.

Another hurdle is the lack of confidence of the people in their own government, and by extension the coalition.

Government corruption, not the Taliban, is keeping businesses from flourishing in Afghanistan, said Ahmed Shah Lmar, regional manager for one of the country's leading cellular telephone companies. Lmar said businesses lose hundreds of millions of dollars to corruption, development plans sit in government offices gathering dust, and incompetent government officials delay projects until they become financially untenable.

"The government is more of a headache for us than the Taliban," said Lmar, interviewed in an office at the end of a long hall protected by armed men and closed circuit televisions.

After eight years and little sign of progress, the yawning chasm between Kandaharis and the international coalition has widened, with the Taliban outdistancing the coalition in the propaganda war for the hearts of the people.

A mark of the Taliban's propaganda success is a widespread belief here that a U.S. cruise missile caused last August's ferocious explosion that killed 41 people and flattened a city block in the heart of Kandahar, instead of the powerful truck bomb they planted.

"I would say 90 per cent of people still believe it was a cruise missile. I blame the government and the international community for not moving faster, giving people information and showing them the proof that it was the Taliban," said Rangina Hamidi, an Afghan American woman who runs a small but thriving business employing more than 200 Afghan women.

Hamidi returned to her native Kandahar in 2003 to run a charity for Afghan woman that has since turned into a business with outlets in the United States as well as Kandahar. But she blames both the government and the international community for failing to deliver on promises of security and a better life when the Taliban were driven from the area in 2001.

Hamidi's husband Abdullah, an Afghan whom she met after returning to Afghanistan, had stayed in his homeland throughout the 1980s Russian invasion of Afghanistan, the civil war between rival mujahedeen groups that followed, and finally the repressive Taliban regime.

With each successive regime he held out hope for a better future, turning down an opportunity to travel to the United States in the 1990s. When the Taliban were thrown out, his hope soared. But now he just wants out of what he calls a mess.

"Sometimes I just get hopeless," Hamidi said.

Comments are now closed for this story

David in Dartmouth
said
0 0

Bureaucrats and diplomats.....listen to what is being said here!!.....Take heed!.........The window of opportunity is rapidly closing, and these grievances need to be resolved expeditiously, time is now a luxury that we cannot afford! We have sacrified 134 of our finest, and the most important battle has yet to be won...the hearts and minds of the people! All that has been achieved is the transplanting of our procrastinating and dithering ways in to a country that can ill afford it. Unless Karzai and his cronies move immediately, Mr. Tallie will be back....badder than ever!


david sawkiw[saskatchewan farmer]
said
0 0

"sometimes I just get hopeless" :: Quite the commment,, and I think it says a lot. Another famous quote ::: "without trust,,there is no relationship."Why are we there??


John E
said
0 0

What has it been? Seven years. Every few months there's another general with another strategy that will rout the Afgan fighters; however we are still there and they show no signs of leaving or giving up. Yes it's a long tunnel with no light at the end. They have to fight to the end because they have no place to go.


The Man
said
0 0

Maybe if civilians would tell the soldiers who the Taliban are, they wouldn't fire on civilians by mistake as much. Afghans have got to realize that this is their country, and if they want peace they have got to get off the fence and support one side or the other. Enough of this, "I don't support either side but I'm suffering" neutrality nonsense.


SK Doc
said
0 0

No surprise here - Kandahar has always been the home of the Taliban which is why NATO is sitting in their front room...as for posters who think that the Afhan people don't want to be free of the Taliban, you are quite wrong...peace is not the ultimate objective of this existence, freedom is...


R. E. Lee, Cold Lake, AB
said
0 0

Where is the support from other Muslim countries who have earned trillions of dollars from us in oil sales? Why are they not paying for the cost of helping fellow Muslims rebuild Afghan security forces and infrastructure? Why are not Saudi troops protecting Khandahar and the surrounding countryside? Why are Canadians paying in so many ways, yet when do we hear about Kuwait paying for rebuilding hospitals and schools? Some people will kill Canadian troops and aid workers just because they are not Muslim. The United States helped Europe rebuild after WW2 with the Marshall Plan; where is the Islamic Initiative to help Afghans so we don't have to be there? All we hear about is how Canadian and American troops should or should not be in Afghanistan, and how the war is dragging on. We need a massive new commitment from wealthy Muslim nations to bring peace to the Afghan people, who are being victimized by fellow Muslims.


Attila D'Hun
said
0 0

If I remember well, Mullah Omar suggested to put bin Laden on trial in front of a muslim court in a muslim country. That was 8 years ago. What would have been the situation now, if Bush had accepted it ? 1. Bin Laden would be sitting in a muslim jail.2. A trillion dollar less spending in armaments3. No Iraq war.4. Afghanistan would be a stable - hard liner - but friendly country to the US4. 5000 less death of US and other troups.


Linda in Vancouver
said
0 0

We all know the real victory can only come if we win the"hearts and minds of the people". But that's a tougher challenge when nations are threatening to leave every second day. If I were living there,I'd be reluctant to be seen as supporting NATO or ISAF if they're not in it to win. Doing so,would assure torture and death with the return of the Taliban.The people will only support their own government when they are convinced of their competency and of their commitment to success. Tough talking candidate Obama is looking more and more like a weak President Obama with the inability to make a tough decision.While I am aware that Mr.Bush left him in a tough position,it's now his job to decide.He gave every indication he could do that before he was elected,now it's time to walk the walk. But diplomacy and talk with other nations in that region are vital too.China,India,Pakistan are vital cogs in this wheel.As Russia will also need to co-operate. I will say this,to rebut the guy from Toronto,who refers to the "Highway of Zeros".If all the forces from all the nations had conducted themselves as well as those who served there on Canada's behalf,there would be a lot more trust and a lot more commitmanet from the people living in Afghanistan.They have conducted themselves with the utmost professionalism.They have won high praise from others in NATO in general.But from several very highly placed Generals and US leaders.On CNN,more than once,I have heard Americans suggest they could learn a lot from the way Canada has been conducting itself.I am extremely proud of our military men and women for what they have done.We need more citizens like them,not less.Americans speaking well of Canada?? That has not happened in decades my friends.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

CTV News

Canada in Afghanistan

Canada in Afghanistan

The latest news, photos and interactives from Canada's mission in Afghanistan.

Ahmed Wali Karzai

The King of Kandahar

Ahmed Wali Karzai on friends, enemies, and rumours.

Corruption

An Open Wound

Corruption in Afghanistan soars to new levels.

CU-170 Herons

CU-170 Herons

Spyplanes give Canadian commanders good intelligence.

Popeye

'Popeye'

Longtime fixture at Afghan base found murdered.

Bios and Pictures

Casualties

Canadian Casualties

We remember those who lost their lives in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.

In Pictures

On the front lines

On the front lines

U.S. troop 'surge' in Kandahar as Canada hands over command.

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Facebook

Share this article with Facebook

DIGG

Share this article with Digg

Newsvine

Share this article with Newsvine

Delicious

Share this article with delicious

Email

Share this article.
Send Email

Twitter

Share this article with Twitter

StumbleUpon

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Reddit

Share this article with Reddit

Yahoo! Buzz

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz

Most Talked about Stories

Naturally coming on the heels of the Gulf event, this will be jumped on by all involved with both feet and there will be no lack of criticism regardless of who does what. If they had of had it cleaned up within 24 hours, the governor would complain that nobody consulted her on how to do it. A no win situation. I seriously doubt that anyone is deliberately dragging their heels on this, it's too high profile.

Pugfire

Michigan governor criticizes oil spill clean-up effort