News Sections
Amnesty calls for inquiry into Afghan detainees issue
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(64)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Nov. 24 2009 9:54 PM ET
Amnesty International Canada has joined opposition members in calling for a public inquiry into the issue of Canadian troops transferring detainees over to Afghan authorities, a situation that critics say puts prisoners at risk of being tortured.
Alex Neve, the secretary general of Amnesty International Canada, said an inquiry is necessary to get to the bottom of a controversial issue that the government claims has been overblown by inaccurate reports.
"The government's insistence that torture concerns are groundless is now beyond preposterous," Neve said at a press conference in Ottawa on Tuesday morning.
"Ministers seek to attack the credibility of an accomplished diplomat and make absurd suggestions that torture only becomes a concern if it is somehow witnessed firsthand," he said.
"At the same time, their own secretive decisions to occasionally suspend torture clearly indicate that the risk is very real."
Speaking for the first time on the controversy, Prime Minister Stephen Harper brushed aside the explosive allegations.
"The fact of the matter is that whenever Canadian diplomats or Canadian military officials have concrete evidence, substantial evidence, of any kind of abuse, they take appropriate action," he said.
The B.C. Civil Liberties Association has also joined calls for a public inquiry.
Both groups have written to the government requesting an inquiry and have both been at the forefront of the torture issue for years.
In 2007, they filed a court case demanding a judicial review of the actions of Canadian Forces regarding the prisoner transfers in Afghanistan.
The torture issue has again become front-page news, after former diplomat Richard Colvin told a House of Commons committee that he warned officials about torture in Afghan jails.
Political commentator L. Ian MacDonald told CTV News Channel that while the government could potentially pay a political price in the House of Commons, the public may view the detainee issue differently.
"I think if you were to take a poll down at Tim Horton's, people would say: 'Actually, the Taliban are the guys trying to kill our guys, so we're not too concerned about them,'" MacDonald, also the editor of Policy Options magazine, said during an interview from Toronto, acknowledging that it is unknown how many detainees were Taliban supporters or even civilians.
MacDonald said it is doubtful that a public inquiry will proceed, though the special committee that heard from Colvin is free to go "wherever it wants."
"The problem with our committee system is that it's very weak -- they don't have staff, they don't have commission counsels, they don't have directors of communications, they don't have people who can do forensic work for them. And so committees tend to be fishing expeditions," he said.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(64)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Edmonton Jim
0
said
0
darren
0
said
0
Rick in NB, Ste Marie
0
said
0
John
0
said
0
charlie
0
said
0
Doug @ BC
0
said
0
Whether successful or not,it was the Harper government who negotiate a treaty for the protection of the detainees. As to the secrecy,it's clear this generation has been blessed not to have a litalny of armed conflicts in their recent history.Sadly,that leaves them clueless as to why some things cannot be simply a matter of public record.At least,until after the conflict has been resolved.Not only will a public debate,false accusations,and phoney innuendos damage Canada in a big way,those discussions will be used by the Taliban to create even more unrest within NATO,they will also de-stabalize the entire mission by causing divisions within ISAF.Canda may never again be trusterd by it's allies,or considered capable of helping in any future conflict. I sincerely hope,that if these allegations are proven false,that apolgies will soon follow the testimony.The Harper Haters should know that these accusations are not only an attack on Harper,but all members of NATO,ISAF,and the UN. If these charges are shown to be anything less than credible,I'll be expecting some people to be charged with treason.The damage already done may be irreversible,regardless of the outcome of an inquiry.
Love is all you need
0
said
0
Nolan Moore
0
said
0
AMMR
0
said
0
Portes
0
said
0
Warren in toon town
0
said
0
Michel (Ottawa)
0
said
0
Acroyear
0
said
0
simon
0
said
0
Myles NWO
0
said
0
John from B.C.
0
said
0
SpinMeNot
0
said
0
Doug Moose Jaw
0
said
0
GTA
0
said
0
John
0
said
0
bob
0
said
0
B. Kelley, Ontario
0
said
0
Charlie in NS
0
said
0
Joanne from Barrie
0
said
0
jackbenimble
0
said
0
Bill Mac Dougall Sr.
0
said
0
Brian fr Langley
0
said
0
Guy Smiley
0
said
0
Shouldn't there be an inquiry to sort through the mess? Don't Canadians have a right to know?
The Man
0
said
0
Poper
0
said
0
Allan Eizinas
0
said
0
Smitherenzes
0
said
0
Eric Reite
0
said
0
Gord. Robson,Nova Scotia
0
said
0
Em
0
said
0
Colin
0
said
0
1)He freely admits that it is heresay evidence from a so called credible source.
2) He freely admits that he did not tell government officials when they came to Afganistan because he did not want them to have a bad day. He freely admits that he did not inform General Hillier face to face. General Hillier says he does not even know the guy.How come he did not inform Nato, the United Nations, Canadian media or international media. If he thought it was true when he supposedly first heard about it and did nothing or said nothing until he could find a stage to act out on makes him at worst an aider and abbetor of torture, at best a liar. It is very disheartening to see politicians and the news media jump on this keystone show without asking and investigating these facts. Mind you, one can not expect much from a politician of any party, but the media show know and do better.
Paula
0
said
0
David Clark
0
said
0
Canadian soldiers are not alleged to have tortured anyone and it isn't against Canadian law for Afghans to torture each other.
We don't need an public inquiry to fix what might be broken, as it will just turn into a political witch hunt with the taxpayers getting the bill.
Deborah
0
said
0
This makes him a "whistleblower"?
Not in my mind.
Colvin is simply a man who shares the abhorence most Canadians feel concerning torture, and our wish not to participate in it directly or indirectly. It is contrary to Canada's military policy, moreover.
"Proven allegations", Mr. MacKay, are irrelevant. The Afghan authorities are not being charged with anything. Canadians are simply asking that our military not be handing Afghanis over to Afghan authorities if there is a likelihood of torture.
There IS a likelihood of torture and you, Mr. MacKay, are guilty of willful blindness.
SK Doctor
0
said
0
Rob, NS
0
said
0
A lot About Nothing
0
said
0
Ted 999
0
said
0
BO in BC
0
said
0
Bob Auld
0
said
0
c
0
said
0
Brandon
0
said
0
The Thing i find deplorable is how every one seems to be blaming Canada as if Canadians were doing the torturing. i dont hear cries for the downfall of the Afgan Government only for the harper government, Who took over a War the Librals got us into in the first place!
Raymond's 2 cents
0
said
0
Shlomo
0
said
0
Dan
0
said
0
daveyboy
0
said
0
Jake
0
said
0
allan
0
said
0
Linda in Vancouver
0
said
0
Jim McB
0
said
0
the old lady
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
david
0
said
0
Raymond
0
said
0
Ken
0
said
0
Roland Godin
0
said
0
election time
0
said
0
Kayla T
0
said
0
Phillip: Gay
0
said
0