CTV News | PM lauds press freedom in speech, avoids reporters

Politics -   

PM lauds press freedom in speech, avoids reporters

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Toronto Extended: PM makes speech
At a gala dinner for the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada, Prime Minister Stephen Harper spoke about how freedom of the press 'serves as evidence Canada lives its values.'

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(51)

Photos

Slideshow image

View Larger Image

The Canadian Press

Date: Sun. Nov. 22 2009 10:47 PM ET

TORONTO — Prime Minister Stephen Harper urged journalists to "shine light into dark corners" of government affairs during a speech late Saturday, but wouldn't take questions from reporters covering the event.

Harper, who is known for his sometimes prickly relationship with parliamentary reporters, made the comments during an ethnic media awards dinner in Markham, north of Toronto.

Freedom for Canadians goes hand-in-hand with journalistic freedom, he told the dinner guests gathered at Seneca College in Markham, home to thriving Asian communities.

Members of the ethnic press and their readers understand what it's like in countries where "truth is only what the state says it is" and journalists are co-opted as government mouthpieces or threatened with their lives, Harper said.

Things couldn't be more different here in Canada, he added.

"Our government does not tell journalists what to say, or attempt to intimidate those with whom it disagrees," he said.

"Instead we believe strongly that Canadians' freedom is enhanced when journalists are free to pursue the truth, to shine light into dark corners, and to assist the process of holding governments accountable."

But shortly after making the speech and handing out awards, Harper was whisked through the black curtains behind the stage without taking questions from reporters.

The prime minister's staff said before the event, which was open to the media, that Harper would not be taking questions from reporters covering the event, which was organized by the National Ethnic Press and Media Council of Canada.

He has yet to comment on explosive allegations that top government officials knew about the torture of Afghans taken prisoner by Canadian soldiers and handed off to Afghan forces.

Since Harper came to power, the schedule for cabinet meetings became shrouded in mystery, requests for routine information can take days or sometimes ignored altogether and delays in processing freedom-of-information requests has grown markedly.

His office also imposed new rules that allow Harper's staff to choose which reporter is allowed to ask him a question -- a practice more commonly used in Washington by U.S. presidents.

The federal Conservatives have long courted ethnic voters through the newspapers and other media that serve them, a tactic used by the Liberal party for decades.

In his speech, Harper noted that the Tory caucus includes members of Canada's diverse communities, such `as International Cooperation Minister Bev Oda.

Canada's Conservative parties have always "sought to open doors" for those seeking to represent Canada's ethnic communities, he said.

Douglas Jung, the first Chinese Canadian elected to Parliament, was a Conservative, as was Lincoln Alexander, the first black cabinet minister.

"I had to mention that," Harper said with a grin.

Comments are now closed for this story

Bill in BC
said
0 0

Too bad the press don't have to take responsibility for how they exercise that freedom. Perhaps the press should be required to stop "slanting" their reports and creating controversy where none exists, "muck-racking" for the sake of sales and generally trying to mold opinions in the readership instead of being an ethical reporter of events and facts. And they wonder why nobody trusts a reporter.


tam
said
0 0

"The modern conservative...is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy. That is the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness." John Kenneth Galbraith. I am sure many leaders have their "moral justifications" for not holding regular public discussion in whatever venue. The media certainly is far from perfect as a tool for engaging politicians but it is one venue. That any leader is so hesitant to engage with them is telltale of a certain "selfishness" that is of course likely not in the best interests of citizens regardless of political stripe. This of course is not exclusive to Mr. Harper's party, but this party is seeming to exemplify this type of "selfishness" particularly well in attempts to control the spin and confuse and conflate. For the current government it would seem promises not kept are best not talked about and plans for the future would best left unclarified and uncertain. This is a strategic way to present a lesser target for any criticism and for any accountability. What I find interesting is that humans individually are quite intelligent and giving. Mr. Harper no doubt is a fine person. What is disturbing is as a group, a certain mentality takes over and it is this type of "arch" mentality that isn't grounded firmly in a personal ethic so much as an expedient one, that ends up holding sway. Such is politics. Still the current govn't should be much more open and available for discussion with those favour and do not favour them. Media is an important venue for that. regards


PM
said
0 0

So what? Does the author of this story really not understand the difference between the media being free to tell the truth as they see it, and the media feeling entitled to the prime-minister's time? The prime minister answers to the people, not the media. Maybe if they understood that a bit better, they could concentrate on digging to the truth instead of fishing for cheap 'gotcha' moments.

Tom Lewis
said
0 0

Funny how the article is more about the reporters complaints about Harper and access to him than about the speech. When did reporters become the story and the world an irrelevant detail?

allan
said
0 0

I dont blame him. Why listen to a bunch of mostly idiotic and biased questions when you dont have to. Now that the media has made fools of themselves by fearmongering the H1N1 virus, they need to create another crisis.

Cambob
said
0 0

I have seen the Prime Minster taking questions from reporters. If the media was informed prior to the event that the PM would not be taking questions, what the hell is the point of this story?

Irritable Canadian
said
0 0

Ah, so he did exactly what President Obama did when he was in China last week? Glad we cleared that up.

Tim
said
0 0

The article title implies Harper is being 2 faced about this. But touting freedom of the press (which is what we have; news organizations can virtually say anything they want in this society) is not the same thing as giving them interviews. The press has freedom to print/say what they want and the PM has the perogative not to give interviews to said press if he wants. No hypocrisy here.

Dr. M., Chilliwack
said
0 0

The hypocrisy of Mr. Harper lauding press freedom while refusing to take questions highlights what is going wrong with the democratic process both here and in the U.S. The responsibility of journalists is to report the new fairly and accurately. But with FOX news clearly violating that principle by becoming a mouthpiece for the Republican party in the states, while absurdly claiming to be "fair and balanced", the media in general have lost credibility. Infotainment has replaced real reporting, with reporters afraid to ask hard questions in case they lose access. And with politicians on both siders of the isle using reporters to spin stories, and refusing to take questions, the people are losing the window into the political process that they need to keep tabs on politiians. Both journalists and politicians are responsible here- but so are we, the public, who put up with this nonsense. Look how the first three posters here are so quick to blame the media, without realizing that Mr. Harper is just usinsg the media to tell a narrative about democracy and freedom, without honouring that very principle he espouses. Unless people are willing to hold both the media and politicians up to a higher standard, expect more of the same.

Richard L. Provencher
said
0 0

If some reporters would refrain from trying to create stories rather than reporting them, the public might have more sympathy for them. Good for our PM not to be distracted.

edgar
said
0 0

Harper has always had the habit of micro-managing and being in control.

Huntley Haverstock
said
0 0

The Press has become jingoist. And Mr. Harper couldn't be happier about that.

Paul from Saskatoon
said
0 0

The writer of this piece forgot that freedom works two ways. The press is free to report, but we, and the PM, are free to ignore them.Perhaps, when journalists quit being advocates for causes and political viewpoints, we will give them a bit more respect. We expect them to quit ignoring stories that don't fit their world view, or begin to report all fact important to issues, not just those that push a particular slant.Many of us use "the press" to get basic facts, but apart from that, we don't trust journalists because they ABUSE their freedom and have little respect for what should be an honourable profession.

I. M. Wright
said
0 0

Why is Harper incapable of courage?

Steve in PEI
said
0 0

Every commenter so far has been a huge Conservative fanboy and has missed the central point of Harper's huge hypocrisy in praising press freedom. The Harper government is the most secretive and controlling and hostile to the media in decades. Openness, transparency and access to information have made huge strides backwards under the Conservatives, contrary to all their promises. You have the feeling that if they could use more coercive tactics to control the media, they would in a heartbeat.At least when the Liberals had a scandal, everyone winded up knowing about it. Under the Conservatives, there will be no more scandals, not because the Tories are doing nothing wrong, but because it will be covered up far more effectively. What a comfort. But hey, you can always trust a politician, as long as he's a Conservative, right?


Harper the HYPOCRITE
said
0 0

Run, Harpo, run.


Jake
said
0 0

Fluff always avoids substance. Harper has demonstrated himself to be a lightweight on economic matters despite being an economist. If he has to fall back on his personality for votes, the Tories are in trouble.


carl
said
0 0

Love your backdrop of Liberal colors Steve.The great one is going to have get the image makers at the Olympic committee to do something about that flag.


edd-medhat
said
0 0

Who gives a crap about the press? They only report what their loony left bosses want anyway. Harper has never been dealt a fair pass by the press and I don't blame him for getting himself set up for a lynching.Did anyone notice that in this whole article, the press concentrated more on how they were treated instead of actually reporting what happened at the meeting. (POOR POOR PRESS).


MARG MM
said
0 0

Can't blame him really, as the reporters always seem to turn everything he says into their own spin, and it is usually not in his favour.


Red X
said
0 0

The Criticism is fair considering he won't answer the questions of the free media...


Peter In MB
said
0 0

People and especially the press need to learn that freedom of the press and freedom of speech does not give one the right to say or do what ever one feels like. Before people champignon their charter rights they should read the long forgotten section of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms entitled… LIMATATIONS!


Doug @ BC
said
0 0

Well said "Allan".Anyone who hasn't personally seen the media "spin" the words of someone granting an interview simply hasn't been paying attention.I see and hear it every day,both in the local papers,and on the news.I can actually cite instances where I saw the press conference first,and the news later.It outrages me when even this average working trades person,can see the bias and spin when what the reporter wrote,or the news commentator said,was nothing like what the person interviewed actually said. IT's this way,because people "spin" what was said,into something they hoped would be said.A leader,or anyone else being questioned,is in a position of having to decide whether it's better to have his comments "spun",and be pilloroed for the "spin",or to avoid the interview,and be beat up for not being available. In this day fo "gotcha",or "National Enquirer" journalism,it's a tough choice.Possibly the classic "rock and a hard place" dilema.


Shaner
said
0 0

While there seems t be a fair amount of media bashing here as a member of the media (Not with CTV) I have to agree on the swine flu coverage point but not on the ones concerning the PM and the media. As Prime Minister Stephen Harper has an obligation to answer to the media. Maybe not every single time we like but in most cases. Unfortunately for us and for the Canadian people Harper has forged an adversarial relationship with the media. Instead of taking a middle road approach. Yes, this has caused slanted stories as the media backlashes and yes I think that too is unfortunate. What most people don't understand is how little the PM talks to or even allows the media anywhere near him. Take his most recent trips to the west coast. Every event was a photo op only no questions and if you didn't have a camera as a reporter you weren't even allowed into the event. At the best of times this is a tactless way to do business as a PM even more so on the West Coast where people and the media rarely see a PM anyway. If....If the media is doing there job correctly we try to tell a fair story based on fact. If we are not allowed access to information or even to talk to our countries head of state how can we serve in our role to hold the government to account? Yes people need to hold us to account as well but what Canadians need to start asking themselves is how their right to know their very freedom is being affected. When a government blocks access, delays freedom of information requests, and has a PM that refuses to take questions?


Rob
said
0 0

The way the media treated and keeps on treating Harper , I don't blame for the guy no to like or trust the media


GTA
said
0 0

Our so-called journalists never let the facts get in the way of their anti-Harper stance. Our media is so skewed by their Liberal agenda that they have lost all credibility as professionals. With so many other news resources available online worldwide, it is incredibly easy to debunk most of what is posted by Canadian sources as fact.


Mike, ON
said
0 0

What does press freedom have to do with Harper not taking questions?Answer: Nothing!

Portes
said
0 0

What about press freedom for Mrs. Dion????What happened to her story, why did it disappeaer so quickly, blast Harper but look at what you have done. Forcing someone to remove their personal posting from the web. SHAME SHAME on the Liberals


Andrew Mason
said
0 0

As Harper accurately stated "[o]ur government does not tell journalists what to say, or attempt to intimidate those with whom it disagrees". Journalists do not, however, have a right to ask Harper questions at every event or photo-op. This is especially so when all they would have asked about was the Afghan detainee issue to garner soundbytes and copy and tried to make it seem the government was silencing Colvin, when in fact the government has merely stated that his allegations are not credible. If Colvin has indeed been complaining about abuse for years it would appear that this did not prevent the government from rewarding his more general service and work with a prestigious position in the US, even if it knew of and disagreed with his allegations. One can't blame Harper for not wanting to be painted as anti-free speech or as intimidating bureaucrats at such a event when neither is accurate.


Adam, Montreal
said
0 0

Go ahead cons, defend harper on this one, only shows how brainwashed you are.


Vot e for us as long as you don't ask us anything
said
0 0

@Cambob,If the PM wasn't planning on allowing questions, what the hell was the point of speaking about media freedom in Canada? Denying media access is exactly what countries like China and Iran are known for - great to see Harper and the Reformed Conservatives (aka Megalomaniacs 'r Us) are embracing their policies.

Funny
said
0 0

You guys are hillarious!! It's so obvious to witness your OWN partisan slant - do you actually believe the drivel that you type into your keyboard? Having a free unfettered media is a major component of any democracy. If any head of state does not have to answer to the media then that undermines the very nature of democracy. What makes this story so ridiculous is while our PM heralds how important the above is, he refuses to participate in the process! Even the Americans have a Press Secretary - all they have to do is BS them everytime. What's so difficult about that?

Dr. M
said
0 0

As I read these comments, I can't help but think that the views expressed reveal fundamental differences about how Liberals and Conservatives see the role of the media and the power of politicians.Liberals see the fourth estate, the media, as our representative in political affairs. In the Liberal view, we need a fair, objective media to ask difficult questions of our politicians as a way of keeping them honest. Politicians are not our masters, but our servants, and real political power lies in the hands of the people. Without a fair and honest media operating in the people's interests, politicians can hide their scandals with impunity. Politicians have an obligation to answer fair questioins in a reasonable manner, and not evade the people by hiding from their representatives. Conservatives, on the other hand, seem to have a different view of the role of the media, seeing them as prying into matters that are none of their business. In this view, Mr. Harper does not have an obligation to answer the questions of the media, and is therefore not accountable to the people between elections. If the media report something that Conservatives don't like because it challenges their beliefs, then that's somehow evidence of "media bias". The question of whether the facts are actually real isn't important. So the presumption grows that the media have a "Liberal bias" because the facts keep undermining the Conservative view of the world. So Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, global warming's a myth, and the Conservatives never knew about torture in Afghanistan. So now we have two cultures: one concerned with media fairness and keeping politicians honest, the other only interested in listening to news that suits their own right-wing agenda. That pretty much sums it up, doesn't it?


gl
said
0 0

bill in bc is on the mark. with freedom comes responsibility. our media outlets, especially the one supported by our tax dollars, demand the former without having to account for the latter. their liberal bias is obvious in most of the stories covered by their reporters.


Ken - Calgary
said
0 0

LIAR! He goes on and on about freedom of the press, yet he will talk ONLY to Conservative-friendly press who submit their questions in advance so that the PMO has time to either construct a lie, or blame the Liberals for everything. Harper is a dictator, plain and simple.


Jay, Ottawa
said
0 0

LOL, this guy is such a clown. It's sort of like if Chevy Chase's impression of Gerald Ford became our Prime Minister.


Pat - Ottawa
said
0 0

Shaner wrote, "As Prime Minister Stephen Harper has an obligation to answer to the media. Maybe not every single time we like but in most cases."This is typical of the media, confusing their role in the world. The PM is accountable to the people (obligation), but has zero accountability to the media. When well exercised the media can be of benefit to both the governement and the people, but they are not accountable to either. That in the end is the whole point of "freedom of the press". That the media can be of benefit to the people does not mean that the government has an obligation to talk to the media.


Jay, Ottawa
said
0 0

gl saidbill in "their liberal bias is obvious in most of the stories covered by their reporters." Wait, so because a story doesn't adhere to your Conservative bias it has a liberal bias? You should google "confirmation bias" - and that's one to grow on!


TVic in Guelph
said
0 0

Talk the talk but avoid walking the walk. Our PM does it again. By the way, PM when is your next interview with your friends at the Fox News Channel?


Toby
said
0 0

Mr. Harper is a dictator pure and simple. The only people that can not see this are the minority of Canadians that lick his boots. He is afraid of the media because they might just might find out exactly what he is.


Spence in Ontario
said
0 0

Only Harper could do something this ironic. I think it's pretty safe to say that Harper and the Conservatives have not been very open to the media at home here in Canada. A lot of the government operations were far more open to the press back when the Liberals were in power. He may not have intended to take questions during the speech this time but it is still an amusing irony to praise freedom of speech and the press then not take questions afterwords. The speech also has bad timing considering the allegations of Harper and the cons trying to discredit the testimony of Richard Colvin in regards to Canadian forces handing over prisoners in Afghanistan that were tortured later in the custody of the Afghan police and army. It is even more ironic when we consider that Harper and the former Reform Party campaigned on government transparency for over a decade. After getting into power they become the least transparent administration in recent history. I can't say I'm really surprised though. Modern conservative ideology just does not seem to have accountability and public openness as one of its major tenants.Oh and for the record the myth of liberal media bias is just that, a myth. There is no factual basis for that. Personally I feel that in the US if anything there is a conservative media bias because they try to play it 50/50 when there is next to no truth to the conservative/republican side. A large portion of the American media treats the utter lies and propaganda republicans and conservative commentators put out as valid points when there is no truth to it whatsoever. Ultimately this has had a negative effect on journalism there and the ability of ordinary people to be properly informed about current events.


allan
said
0 0

Like Churchill once said "if you are not a liberal minded person when you are young, you have no compassion, but if you are not a conservative minded person when you are older you do not have a brain". Lots of older thinkers still in Canada, unfortunately.


Shaner
said
0 0

Pat - Ottawa: Last I checked the people whom the government is accountable to get their information via the media. I believe Mr. Harper said in the above story the media are "free to pursue the truth, to shine light into dark corners, and to assist the process of holding governments accountable." SO Pat hw do you do that and keep the people in know as per Democratic process when a Prime Minister won't talk, is bloacking and or slowing down access to information? I say it again the Prime Minister DOES have an obligation to talk to the media BECAUSE of the people. That is what the media IS! If we do our job correctly we are conduit to the people! So they can be informed, educated, and hopefully know the truth. If not then why are journalists are limited, shut down, beaten or killed in other parts of the world where freedoms we enjoy as Canadians don't exist? Give your head a shake.


I. M. Wright
said
0 0

It's understandable why Harper micro-manages: he has to cover for idiots like MacKay and Cannon in his Cabinet.As for Mrs. Dion: her opinion doesn't get too much attention because she's not a Liberal Party official. She is of about much importance as Laureen Harper or Mila Mulroney. Harper only talks to Conservative Party riding associations where attendance is by invitation only. Right wing nuts are by nature very fearful people. That's why they hate so many kinds of people. Fear, hatred, lying, violence: all part of the same syndrome.


Mike
said
0 0

What do you expect from an idiot PM. Run and hide you CON.


charlie
said
0 0

"PM avoids reporters" - er, the prelim said that there would not be a question period. This rises to the level of avoiding reporters - which sounds a bit like running from them? Is the suggestion that the PM has to respond to reporters on an " on demand" basis, i.e. to their schedule? Can't see it myself. Doubt if many others can either. Seems to me like some reporters have been watching too many "60 Minutes" episodes.


Citizen
said
0 0

The press are free to ask questions and write what they would like. However in Canada this is greatly abused by our media which has prompted most political leaders to have to avoid questions. If a question was asked and the Prime Minister said no comment at this time, the story would be he refused to answer the question. And yes, sometimes government cannot answer questions at the time, especially around allegations surrounding the torture situation in Afganistan because there is an ongoing investigation. The Prime Minister was there to give a speech on specific topic, not to hold a press conference. If media respected that then I bet he would have stayed.


Freeman Blaze
said
0 0

The press in western democracies are a self elected fifth estate. They presume that they are in charge and that the elected leaders are at their beck and call. Wrong. That is the purpose of the question period and the elected opposition. The H1N1 saga is a prime example of irresponsible media hysteria as opposed to sober objective reporting. I'm not a fan of Harper but I can understand his ignoring the rabid unprofessional left wing press.


V aka Layton in Moncton
said
0 0

Hello pot, this is kettle...you are black. Classic bait and switch. If Harper says it, it must be true. This government will not allow the press its freedom, they pick and choose who can ask questions, and what questions they can ask. Just because there is no gun to the media's heads doesn't mean they are not censored, and not willing dupes of the government. "Want a career? Play the game in the Press Pool" Time to vote these goons out. By the way, has he said anything yet about allegations of war crimes against his government? Didn't think so.


Kajere
said
0 0

Fine, let Harper go the American way with journalists. What I don't understand though is why his team did not select some reporters to ask him questions. True the PM scorns reporters maybe with justifiable reasons. The bottom line though is that Canadians deserve to know the reality of this Afghanistan potential Afghangate. He may not think it is serious. From a humanitarian and human rights point this is a blow to Canada's foreign policy. Iran now has an opportunity to tell us that what goes around comes around and that no country has monopoly of given thematic area. So at this point as a Canadian, I’m appealing to the Tories to tell Canadians what they knew and did about torture suffered by Afghans. If we must teach by example, this is an opportunity for the Canadian government to set the record straight once and for all.

Michael
said
0 0

Kudos to Harper the only PM who has backbone to stand up to these leftie humanist reporters who are a legend in their own minds and do not represent mainstream Canadian cultural values.It is PM Harper's right to choose to work with those who work with him. The rest can get lost. I would do exactly the same.

Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz