CTV News | Ontario urged to improve its health score

Canada -   

Ontario urged to improve its health score

Slideshow image

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(5)

Selected Comment

Why do people act so harmed by these surveys. ICES is a watchdog for Ontario health issues. They have no ulterior motives. But when you don't like the message, shot the messenger. How paranoid is that?

Rick in NB, Ste Marie

Ontario urged to improve its health score

talking about
Ontario urged to improve its health score

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Friday Nov. 6, 2009 3:47 PM ET

Ontario has a long way to go to become the healthiest province in the country, say researchers from the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), who found that British Columbia is the healthiest province in the country.

The ICES report found there are a number of reasons Ontario is lagging, some of them pertaining to poor lifestyle and others due to gaps in the health system.

Compared to the leading provinces, Ontario's health behaviour is worse, government health targets are lower, and fewer resources are allocated to improving health behaviours related to smoking, physical activity, diet and obesity, says Dr. Doug Manuel, the study's principal investigator and ICES researcher.

"Quebec was identified as a leader, not because their health is better than Ontario but because their health is rapidly improving," he said in a news release.

"Quebec's life expectancy will surpass Ontario's within the next 10 to 15 years, for the first time since life expectancy has been recorded in Canada."

The report found that:

  • 21 per cent of Ontarians are daily or occasional smokers. That compares to 18 per cent in B.C. and 20 per cent in Manitoba.
  • Ontario ranks fourth in the country for physical activity, with 53 per cent of the population being active. That's behind B.C., Alberta and the Northwest Territories/Nunavut/Yukon. Being regularly active is defined as taking part in more than 30 minutes of moderate physical activity each day.
  • More than 14 per cent of Ontarians are obese with a BMI of 30 or higher. B.C. has the lowest obesity rate at 12.6 per cent, followed by Quebec at 13.4 per cent.
  • While Ontario has the second highest life expectancy at 80.7 years, that's still behind B.C. at 81.2 years.

In order for Ontario to match British Columbia's health targets by the 2015, the ICES researchers say the following must happen:

  • The smoking rate has to drop to less than 15 per cent.
  • More than 73 per cent of Ontarians need to become regularly physically active.
  • The overweight or obese rate as measured by Body Mass Index (BMI) must drop to below 32 per cent.
  • Government must invest at least an additional $165 million per year into programs aimed at improving health behaviours related to smoking, physical activity, diet and obesity.

Manuel's report notes that Quebec has become a national leader in improving overall population health because over the past two decades, the province has instigated major and sustained efforts to improve population health behaviours.

"This has allowed Quebec to pull ahead of many other provinces in terms of residents' life expectancy," the report notes.

Compared to Ontario, both Quebec and British Columbia and Quebec are spending more per capita on health improvement programs. B.C. is currently investing about three times as much as Ontario and Quebec twice as much.

ICES is a non-profit organization that uses population-based health information to produce reports on a broad range of health care issues affecting Ontario and Canadian resdients.

Comments are now closed for this story

Portes
said
0 0

Sure I will do all of these things. Just give me the money. I hate when I am told to do or not to do, that just turns me off and send me the other way. I have always been independant and do not follow anyone but myself. People these days think that they know everything and that we must follow blindly without asking questions. Sorry but that is not me, give me reasons and let me think it out myself, not tell me. As my grand daughter would say "You are not my boss"


Chris in Montreal
said
0 0

Portes - not smoking is free, and walking costs nothing either... and lowing your caloric intake and substituting your bad calories is also pretty cheap.What I see here is just a lack of willingness to make the simple behavioural changes needed to improve your health.If you want to die early and die in an unhealthy state that's up to you. I look forward to taking care of my body and dying later and not so painfully :)


SJW
said
0 0

They base some of it on the BMI, but that isn't an accurate depiction of how healthy or unhealthy a person is...never mind that, as far as I'm concerned, if the government is so concerned about the health costs associated with cigarette smoking, then they should just make them illegal...what's that? Oh ya, they make way too much money off of selling smokes so it's not going to happen...SO SHUT UP ABOUT THE SMOKING ALREADY!!!!!


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said
0 0

Why do people act so harmed by these surveys. ICES is a watchdog for Ontario health issues. They have no ulterior motives. But when you don't like the message, shot the messenger. How paranoid is that?


Portes
said
0 0

I don't know how old you are and what you do, however life is to be enjoyed , fine live to 100 and spend 20 years of it in a nursing home as a vegetable, I don't want that. My family usually go ga ga at 73 and end up in a hursing home. That is the way my Mum was and she lived until she was 85, 12 years of her life as a vegetable. She did not drink, smoke, excerised daily and for what


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz

Most Talked about Stories

The chance of the destruction of our planet is very very small with this collider, but who are these people to decide what risks are acceptable for all of mankind? It puts me at unease and adds to my anxiety. CERN acknowledges that there are miniscule risks -- they admit to it so please spare the convoluted retorts.

kc-bby

Hadron Collider back in action after year of repairs