News Sections
Karzai challenger unsure of Afghanistan's future
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. Nov. 4 2009 1:09 PM ET
Former Afghan presidential candidate Abdullah Abdullah says despite Canada's military and political efforts in Afghanistan, the recent election that was compromised by widespread fraud shows there is no guarantee the war-torn country is headed towards democracy.
In an exclusive interview with CTV's South Asia Bureau Chief Janis Mackey Frayer, Abdullah said he wished the recent elections would have had a different outcome, so Canadians could look upon them "as a worthwhile effort," and be buoyed by the fact that democratic reforms were indeed on their way for millions of Afghans.
"But the only thing that today I can say at this stage (is that Canadians should care) because of the threats and security, for the security of your country and the stability in this region, and world peace," Abdullah said.
"Otherwise, I should have been able to tell you as your answer that as a result of your efforts, millions of people in this country are enjoying their democratic rights. It's what they deserved. So a lot has happened because of your contributions in this country, but there is no doubt that some of those achievements are at great risk, including the democratic process."
Abdullah's harsh assessment of the election outcome's ramifications comes days after Afghanistan's Independent Election Commission acclaimed incumbent Hamid Karzai and cancelled a runoff between the two candidates that had been scheduled for Nov. 7.
Karzai had the most votes following the August 20 presidential election, according to the preliminary results.
However, after a UN-backed panel threw out nearly one-third of his vote tally because of fraud, Karzai did not have the 50 per cent minimum support needed to avoid a runoff against Abdullah, the country's former foreign minister.
But the runoff was cancelled after Abdullah withdrew and charged that a second election would also likely be marred by irregularities.
Abdullah had made a series of demands in order to remain in the runoff, including the firing of the head of the Election Commission, who was appointed by Karzai. However, Karzai refused to agree to that, or Abdullah's other demands.
"I believe in the people's participation and delegation of authority, the devolution of power," Abdullah told Mackey Frayer. "While in Mr. Karzai's case he believes in concentration of all power in one centre, one office."
Abdullah repeated earlier statements that he would not join Karzai's government, but would instead work for change from the outside.
"We should rescue (the struggle for democratic principles), we should rescue it. We shouldn't get disappointed, because the failure to do so, the failure to continue our effort in rescuing these principles, that will mean a victory for the Taliban," Abdullah said.
"So it's for the millions and millions of people in this country, those who didn't vote, who couldn't vote, but believed in the one person, one vote principle, and they are (still) willing to contribute. So we need to make the efforts, and I'm dedicated to that."
User Tools
Related Stories
CTV News
Canada in Afghanistan
The latest news, photos and interactives from Canada's mission in Afghanistan.
Bios and Pictures
Canadian Casualties
We remember those who lost their lives in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.
In Pictures
Corrections Canada
Corrections Canada and Canadian Forces reconstruct and train at an infamous Afghan prison.
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
The chance of the destruction of our planet is very very small with this collider, but who are these people to decide what risks are acceptable for all of mankind? It puts me at unease and adds to my anxiety. CERN acknowledges that there are miniscule risks -- they admit to it so please spare the convoluted retorts.








