CTV News | Dementia patients often suffer in final days

Health -   

Dementia patients often suffer in final days

Slideshow image

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(8)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Thursday Oct. 15, 2009 12:33 PM ET

Advanced dementia should be viewed as a terminal illness that requires palliative care, not further treatment, concludes a report in the New England Journal of Medicine.

Anything less causes patients to suffer unnecessarily, suggest the authors, led by Dr. Susan L. Mitchell from the Hebrew Senior Life Institute for Aging Research in Boston.

Patients with advanced dementia can no longer think properly nor care for themselves. They often can't speak and remain bed-ridden for most of the day.

While dementia doesn't directly cause physical injury, in the final stages, patients can often no longer swallow and can develop infections such as bed sores and pneumonia that can hasten death.

The authors of this report write that too often, as advanced dementia patients approach the end-of-life, they suffer aggressive medical interventions that offer little benefit. What patients really need is "comfort" care, the authors contend.

Mitchell and colleagues followed the course of 323 persons in 22 Boston area nursing homes with advanced dementia. The patients generally no longer recognized family members, spoke only a few words, were bed-ridden and incontinent. Over 18 months of study:

  • 53 per cent of the patients developed a fever at least once
  • 41 per cent developed pneumonia
  • 86 per cent developed eating problems.
  • 55 per cent of the patients died

As well, nearly 41 per cent of those who died had at least one "burdensome" treatment within 90 days of death, such as a visit to the ER, intravenous treatment, or placement of a feeding tube.

However, when family members were aware of the poor prognosis, patients were less likely to have these interventions in the final days of life.

Very few of the patients died from a simple physical "event," such as stroke or heart attack. Instead , most died from either infections, eating problems or other conditions related to their dementia, points out Dr. Greg A. Sachs from the Indiana University Center for Aging Research in Indianapolis, who was not involved in the study, in an accompanying commentary.

In his remarks, Dr. Sachs recalls his maternal grandmother's struggle with advanced Alzheimer's disease. Her final months in a nursing home included repeated antibiotic treatments for infections and restraints to control her agitation.

"My grandmother had little in the way of either comfort or company toward the end," he writes.

He adds that 30 years later, end-of-life care for dementia "doesn't look all that different from the treatment she received."

Dementia patient caregivers "need to recognize and treat advanced dementia as a terminal illness requiring palliative care," Sachs writes, referring to care that is aimed at easing a person's pain, but is not intended to halt an illness' progress.

Comments are now closed for this story

George Guthrie
said
0 0

Please Medical Profession pay attention to these findings. Prolonging deteriorating life of dementia patients serves no one, not the poor sufferer or the family, especially the poor blessed creature who has no-one to care for them. It is a horrible way to end one's life in delirium, coma, incontinence, confusion and fear. Please let me slip gracefully away with the elderly's friend pneumonia or other compassionate illness. Of course, us baby-boomers might have the advantage of such an onslaught of numbers that we will hopefully have the choice of taking home a Socrates cocktail when living becomes non-life.


Samual
said
0 0

My mom is in the later stages of Alzheimers. Could ctv or someone answer me.I looked up medical marijuana in Wikipedia the online dictionary.If you go to the contents & click on Alzheimer, the first sentence says that marijuana works better for Alzheimer than the currently approved drugs. Is Wikipedia up to date on this information?If it is up to date why is it not used?


Al in Halifax
said
0 0

They required a study for this? I have 3 relatives with dementia related illnesses. My family's stance has been only do what is required for comfort, anything else is cruel. This is nothing new.I'm sure the Americans will equate this to "death panels", but keeping someone alive because we can has more to do with playing God than letting God (whatever one you subscribe to) doing what is natural and intended.


Linda
said
0 0

Family members who really know the patient and understand their appreciation of their life in its current state need to be very involved in letting a loved one "go palliative" because there is no turning back.

Someone in a very comprimised state of health will die quickly once morphine is introduced. Health care workers and family members who are not very involved have no right making the decison as to whether or not the patient still feels there is quality in their life. Quality of life is personal and patients and close, involved family members must be the ones to decide when it is time to leave this earth. In spite of my mother's poor physical state (feeding tube, not mobile), and inspite of the diagnosis that was given her a few years ago of some type of dementia, she did not want to leave us, when she did this past spring after going palliative due to pneumonia.

In spite of her faith and knowing she would be with her own parents in a better place, she still would have chosen to be here in her state with her husband and kids, but we made the choice for her and it is something that I will struggle with for the rest of my life. I pray my Mom feels I made the right choice for her. I know my siblings who were much less involved feel we did but I believe their expression that she did not know us very well any more, is only made to help alleviate their conscience. Mom knew us in spite of her diagnosis of dementia. As quality of life dwindles some folks come to accept it and still have a desire to live.


Laurie
said
0 0

First of all Mr George, all life is life, at any stage, healthy, handicapped, or ill. Secondly, death cocktails that are voluntary will certainly evolve into involuntary potions ...This is a given, not a theory.

Palliative care is the answer....respect life, respect natural death. Keep the person as comfortable as possible, comfort, love and pray. As a medical professional I have witnessed much suffering and death and can assure you that this method is the most human and comforting for all involved. This is a spiritual time of closeness with your loved one. This culture is looking for reasons to quicken the process, not for compassion sake but for convenience sake. Let's be honest.


Lisa from Toronto
said
0 0

My grandmother has been suffering from dementia for a long time now. It gets worse every month. She has been bedridden for a whole year now, she can't speak or eat properly. Its just very sad to see someone you love suffer like this. Making her feel comfortable is all that we can do now. Its heartbreaking.


V aka Layton in Moncton
said
0 0

Samuel. Quite simply put, pharmaceutical companies are only interested in 'patent' medicines, those which contain chemicals. You cannot have a patent on natural medicines. So you see Big Pharma and Big Medicine is a money game, cures and treatment are a byproduct of making money. This is why we will never cure AIDS, cancer, dementia or other crippling/fatal diseases.


Andrew
said
0 0

hey. i've worked in an acute care facility, peter lougheed in calgary, for the past 6 years. the unit i work on, is specially devoted to end of life, or palliative care. the "aggresive medical interventions" are most often a result of family members who, understandably, do not want to let go of their loved ones. in Alberta, we have 3 code levels for patient care. R for resuscitative care, M for medical care, and C for comfort care. these 3 options provide the most interventions in the event of a code blue wich is cardiac arrest/heart stoppage. in the vast majority of cases, the doctor advocates for the patient, due to their understanding of the medical condition of said patient. they will broach the tough question, and request, as a medical doctor, that this patient be taken off unnessesary medication, IVs be removed, constant taking of blood pressure and other vital signs to stop, among others. basically they are changing a patients code status to comfort care only, or palliative care, like the article states. the dementia has gone so far as to render medical interventions inevitably fallable. as the dude taking care of your grandmother, please make it easy on her. i can't recall how many times, during moments of clarity, in the silence of a room empty of family, has a patient told me in the most honest, sincere way, that they just want to die. they love their families deeply, but the tube in their belly, and the IV in their arm, and the small cocktail of pills multiple times a day, is not the way they want to die. i think this article should speak to the families of patients. if you love them, let them go.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

Subscribe!

CTV MedNews Express

CTV MedNews Express

Sign up for our weekly medical newsletter, delivered for free to your inbox.

CTV.ca Blogs

Health Blog Avis Favaro Marla Shapiro

Health Blog

Check out what our guest medical experts and CTV health reporters are writing about.

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz