News Sections
PM unveils long-awaited development agency
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(68)
Selected Comment
Harper is making a silent statement with tax payers money wasted away.
Money can be better spent by fixing poor infrastructures around the cities, homeless the poor and the crumbling economy to boost standard of living.
The North mission is just another useless void statement with desparations seeping through his photo opts.
Roger T
PM unveils long-awaited development agency
talking about
PM unveils long-awaited development agency
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Aug. 18 2009 9:01 PM ET
Prime Minister Stephen Harper unveiled a new northern development program Tuesday and touted the North's seal hunt, but his message was sidetracked by an unfortunate typo and continued fallout from a distressing photo.
On Tuesday, Harper introduced the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency, which the government says will be responsible for administering federal initiatives and infrastructure programs in the region.
Called CanNor, the agency will be headquartered in Iqaluit, but will also have regional offices in Yellowknife and Whitehorse. It will be backed by a five-year, $50-million budget.
Harper and his cabinet ate seal meat for lunch, but in an apparent effort to avoid any international controversy, did so behind closed doors.
Photos of Gov. Gen. Michaelle Jean eating a raw slice of seal heart earlier this year set off an angry reaction in Europe, where Canadian seal products were recently banned.
Speaking to CTV News Channel, Indian and Northern Affairs Minister Chuck Strahl called the seal meat "fair fare," and said the prime minister enjoyed it.
"People gave him the heads-up that he might not like it . . . but I must say, he enjoyed it," he said. "It was very good."
Harper defended the hunt as important for the northern way of life, even if he didn't want photographic evidence of that support.
"The government support for the sealing industry is well known," he said.
"The standards in this industry are better, quite frankly, than the standards of other industries that deal with animal products. There is no reason the seal industry should be singled out for discriminatory treatment by Europeans or any other nation."
Harper also commented on a heartbreaking photo of two young boys sleeping outside a store in Iqaluit, apparently taken last month.
A local politician called the photo an "embarrassment" and said the area faces serious social problems.
Harper said the photo depicts a "terrible, tragic story."
"I think ... it pains all our hearts when you see that kind of story. I think it would be naive for us to believe ... that this is an isolated story, either here in Iqaluit, in Nunavut, or frankly anywhere else in the country.
"We believe obviously the first and most important aspect of addressing these problems is economic opportunity."
Despite the focus on the North's economy, it was a communication mistake out of the Prime Minister's Office that attracted the most attention.
Probably depending on party affiliation in Nunavut, a PMO news release was either comedic or cringe worthy.
It continually spelled Nunavut's capital as "Iqualuit" -- rather than the proper spelling of Iqaluit.
While the extra "u" may not seem like a massive error to some Canadians, it made a major difference to native speakers in the region.
Iqaluit, spelled properly, means "many fish." Spelled incorrectly, with an extra "u," it means people "with unwiped bums."
"It's not exactly a nice term," Sandra Inutiq of the office of the Languages Commissioner of Nunavut told The Canadian Press in Tuesday's most understated statement.
Two missions in the North
The creation of CanNor was referenced in last fall's throne speech and has been expected for some time.
In a statement released Tuesday, Harper said the government was acting "to unleash the North's true potential."
"We're working with Northerners because we don't want to pretend we have all the answers," Strahl said.
The cabinet committee on priorities and planning, which will be in Iqaluit for the next couple of days, is chaired by the prime minister, and includes 11 Conservative cabinet ministers and Sen. Marjory LeBreton.
Both the NDP and the Liberals have criticized Harper's Arctic trip as simply a repackaging of previous announcements.
"This is simply another version of previous commitments made to the North that transfers programs that already exist under Indian and Northern Affairs Canada and other agencies," Liberal MP and northern affairs critic Larry Bagnell said in a statement.
The prime minister arrived in Iqaluit on Monday evening, the first stop on a five-day-long trip to Canada's Arctic that he has made an annual event since becoming prime minister.
The prime minister will visit various Arctic communities while away from Ottawa, and he will observe military exercises in Frobisher Bay from the deck of the HMCS Toronto on Wednesday.
CTV's Rosemary Thompson said the not-so-secret purpose behind Harper's latest Arctic voyage is to show the world that Canada is serious about protecting its sovereignty.
She said Canada is facing a looming deadline four years from now, when Ottawa will have to let the United Nations know which parts of the Arctic belong to Canada.
"There is a serious issue that is behind this and that is the deadline in 2013, when all polar countries are going to have to submit their science to the UN...to show that they have a certain amount of territory in the Arctic," she said.
And Canada is not the only country in the midst of asserting its Arctic presence.
"The Americans are competing for part of this land, as are the Russians, the Danes and the Norwegians," Thompson said.
Retired Colonel Pierre Leblanc, the former commander of the Canadian Forces in the North, said the famed Northwest Passage is one of the areas currently under dispute.
"The Arctic, or part of it, especially the Northwest Passage, is still a contested area," he told CTV News Channel during an interview from Ottawa on Tuesday. "Canada claims it to be internal water over which it can apply all of it laws and regulations and standards, whereas some countries claim that it's an international strait."
Leblanc said the Harper's visit to the region and the military demonstration that he will attend send a signal to other countries that Canada is serious about its claims to its Arctic territory.
The strategic value of the Arctic is increasing as climate change takes it toll on the Far North. It is believed that as the polar ice caps melt away, the rich resources -- namely the region's oil and gas reserves -- trapped beneath the sea bed and the land, will be easier to access.
Despite what is on the line, Robert Huebert, the associate director of the Centre for Military and Strategic Studies at the University of Calgary, said Canada may be falling behind in its efforts to declare its sovereignty in the Arctic.
"We're seeing efforts of this on a much larger scale -- to be quite frank -- by the Russians, Norwegians and Danes, but it's very important that Canada be showing that, in fact, it's getting the capabilities and is taking its North seriously," Huebert told Canada AM during an interview from Calgary.
All three countries are increasing their military capabilities in the Arctic, while Canada is playing catch-up, he said.
"We're probably further ahead in the context of an overall plan in terms of some of the aspects such as the Arctic strategy, but in terms of our actual capability to be at the Northern waters, we probably have a little ways to go to catch up to some of the other neighbours," Huebert said.
The government has previously announced plans to build six light icebreakers that will patrol the region and is considering building a deep-water port and warfare centre.
Canada has also been keeping a close eye on Russian expeditions to the Arctic, and has taken issue with Russian jets flying near its Arctic airspace.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(68)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
DCR-Toronto
0
said
0
Glad Iggy decided to sleep for a few months. He must be studying hard on how to bring down Harper, but will fail the test.
dwayne-ottawa
0
said
0
Bill in BC
0
said
0
James in NB
0
said
0
simon
0
said
0
Harper should also show that he is seriuos about not letting Inuit children sleep on the streets.
The plight of the children was aired on TV last night.
Let us hope that this is not now suddenly forgotten!
I trust he will not ignore this; elections are round the corner!
CC
0
said
0
dwayne-ottawa...That is quite the ranting, run-on sentence you got there.
Eyes Wide Open
0
said
0
dwayne-ottawa...Am I to believe that you are saying that the Canadians that live all across the north are not "worth the trip"? If the government wants to hold a cabinet meeting in the north or anywhere else in Canada for that matter, it is showing he is thinking of ALL of Canada!
In B.C.
0
said
0
richie cunningham
0
said
0
Conservative in Vancouver
0
said
0
THANK THE LORD we have a level headed government to lead us through this all-world recession. Calm and consistant and no knee jerk reactions. Can you imagine a Dion/Layton team instead?
david sawkiw[saskatchewan farmer]
0
said
0
I wonder if he knows about the theory that prevents the sea-ice forming ?? Supposedly if you were to divert the rivers from dumping into the sea [the fresh water is lighter and floats on top of the salt water] The fresh water freezes sooner than salt water.
We could sell the water from these rivers to California for a tidy profit.
Yes, this would be a good conservative win-win situation!!!
James in NB
0
said
0
open them a little farther. it seems you, and most who have posted here, are brainwashed by political values. most politicians don't care about the people, only the money involved. get a clue. this world revolves around money and power, not the people, unfortunately. we are just an obstacle, and those who don't know any better are just tools for political manipulation, to swing the majority's opinion.
yes, i would love to have faith in our "leader", but i can't trust someone who lies.
i could be wrong, i've been wrong about as many times as i've been right, just the way it goes. we all need to broaden our views about this, take into account ALL variables, and we need to stop taking for granted that the so called "leaders" always know what's best. they're only humans too, not gods.
i agree with "protecting" and "securing" our north, and of course aiding our brothers and sisters who occupy it. but i think all those who agree to further development in the arctic, need to take a little more consideration in the fact that the arctic is THE MOST IMPORTANT PIECE OF LAND ON THIS PLANET. if we were to change it's environment, even a little, i fear that the consequences will too much for future generations to bare.
reidjr
0
said
0
Many are very proud canadians.
DCR-Toronto
0
said
0
GJS - Markham
0
said
0
When you state "coalition crap" you show your ignorance of our parliamentay system as the coalition represented the majority of Canadians approx 68% vs.the 38% that the C minority represents.
Harper played on your ignorance and that of others by making you beleive that it was not legal to form a coalition to oust him and the governor General was wrong in allowing him to dissolve parliament.
The sooner we get rid of Harper and the C's with all their talk and bluster and no reall action we can get our country back on the road to success.
Where is he on retaining the Nortel patents for Canada? No where!
Where is the stimulus money? No where!
Where is he on supporting Canadians in trouble abroad? No where!
Where is he on the isotope file after his big public firing of the regulator more than a year ago? No where!
He talks a lot, blames everyone else contributes very little if anything to the betterment of our country.
the sooner he is gone we will all be better off. Bring on Iggy and the LIberal who have a strong and successful record of fiscal managment and responsibility!!!
In B.C.
0
said
0
D in AB
0
said
0
Red X
0
said
0
People's Republic of China, France, Germany and Japan had positive growth in the 2nd quarter. (24% of the World pop.)Out of RECESSION: already implemented.
Dion and Layton would be doing something to help the unemployed find work and pay taxes. Plus the Environment would be better with Alberta not raining acid on Saskatchewan.
James in NB
0
said
0
so am i correct in assuming that our government plans to allow climate to take place, to take advantage of the money to be made?? this is suppose to be ok? lol, my Lord, i think a few people need a good slap in the face to wake them up! to heck with the planet, as long as we get what we want now eh? get your priorities straight, conservatives, you're about to doom us all...and there's no way in hell that i'm going to stand around and watch this happen.
Cate in Ottawa
0
said
0
I'm very happy that the concerns of the North are getting the attention necessary to make all of us open our eyes and take notice.
If it is not closely monitored, there is a great danger that we will lose said territory. We are up against some pretty huge competition, and we already know from past experience that all parties DO NOT PLAY FAIR!
Dwayne in Ottawa-pull the blankets back up over your head, go back to sleep and stop being so selfish!
Cate
Shawn
0
said
0
Glenn C
0
said
0
Doug in BC
0
said
0
With this in mind,we MUST stop thinking about what is best for us,right now,and consider what we are going to leave behind for our children and grandchildren.
Even as a fromer Liberal,I give Harper the highest grades for LONG TERM thinking.With this recession,with PM's generally serving quite short terms,with the amount of money required for some of his policies,and with some of those policies still in the developement stage,it is highly unlikely that he will be able to see many of them to completion.But he seems to know that even "a journey of a thousand miles starts with a single step".
It is in Canada's best interest to start this project even if finishing it is left to the next generation of Canadians.If we don't start,the options for our children may not be there.They will be sitting back wondering why we let a huge portion of our country fall under the control of foreigners.
We need to stop thinking about ourselves,and consider what value this territory will have in the future,and how it will enrich future generations of CANADIANS.We MUST take steps,no matter how small,right now.This will be a HUGE issue for our children.
Wayne
0
said
0
Doug in BC
0
said
0
But if we let the north,or the northwest passage fall into foreign hands,Canadians will simply have no say as to how to protect,or even if we should protect the environment.Those decisions will have been lost forever.
Before we can begin to think about applying Canadian standards for the environment,we have to establish the north,and the northwest passage,as Canadian territory.This will be a daunting task,and Canada has very few tools with which to accomplish this.
Politicians of all stripes will come and go.But we must ALL support the definition and protection of our borders.THe best way to lose the north is to let selfish,short term thinking and political bias to take over the debate.
Otherwise,even as someone who now supports Conservatives,I agree with much of what you had to say ON THE ISSUE of climate and the environment.
Trev in AB
0
said
0
Some of your comments are pretty interesting. The security of our North should not be ignored. If the overall plan is to develope the North for it's resources would you not agree a Canadian standard of Environmental rules and regulations would be better in the development of these resources than say Russia's? Even if we don't develope the North the North West Passage will be open water someday and again if it is under Canadian control we would better be able to regulate what could sail through those waters so that sub-standard vessels could be turned away to avoid disaster.
Dwayne-Ottawa if you think this is a huge waste of tax money you are not doing much research, there is many other government policies and treaties wasting more money than you could dream of.
GJS-Markham your last statement about responsible spending records of the Liberals is possibly the funniest joke I have heard all week.
I think it is good to see pro-ctive Northern vision instead of waiting for a Reactive (I want my ball back) panic when the Artic slips out of our hands in 4yrs. Good effort PM.
Roger T
0
said
0
Money can be better spent by fixing poor infrastructures around the cities, homeless the poor and the crumbling economy to boost standard of living.
The North mission is just another useless void statement with desparations seeping through his photo opts.
Ross in Burlington
0
said
0
Jay
0
said
0
Wes in the GTA.
0
said
0
We need a balanced approach between development and military presence. The PM is doing his job by visiting and spending some money through government process. Many other parts of the country benefit from government functions so why not the North?
The government for once actually showing an interest in the North is a good thing. No matter what you political affiliation, each of us should consider the possible benefits the local population may recieve.
We can debate about the Liberals destroying our military (they did I am a service member) or the conservatives crossing the line with attack ads(they do); But there is only one important political question here. Why is the opposition silent? I suggest that it is because regardless of partisan politics , this activity in the North is good for Canada.
Cheers,
Raymond
0
said
0
"I thought conservatives were suppose to be about less government, not more"
You'd be howling even louder if they did anything less with this file.
D in AB
0
said
0
I think you give the Conservatives too much credit, indeed any political party in our country and their ability to control the GLOBAL climate. And I think that to plan for the eventuality that climate change may happen regardless of any actions we take is only prudent. Not that I'm hoping for it to happen, but chances seem to be good based on what I've seen of global actions.
Jim Chen from Ontario
0
said
0
Robin
0
said
0
Wes in the GTA.
0
said
0
If we don't establish this area as Canadian, then we have no choice but to sit back and deal with the fall out of Russian and American environmental practices. If you are unsure of what I am getting at research how much toxic waste the Russian navy has dumped into the ocean across the planet in the last decade. It ranges from oil spills South of Ireland to nuclear reactors leaking into the arctic. I would think that Russian industrialization would be the largest possible threat to the Northern environment.
Cheers,
MARG MM
0
said
0
As to the climate change, that will likely happen regardless, so would you people so worried about that rather have Russia, Denmark or Norway in charge? I think it is good that PM Harper and the conservatives are protecting our North and hopefully that will include looking after the people that live there.
Most of you seem to forget that the Conservatives have only been Government (minority at that) for 3 1/2 short years, while the Liberals had many years in power and could already have secured our position in the North, but chose to mostly ignore it and the people that live there.
db
0
said
0
DCR-Toronto
0
said
0
Oh and the only "record" Iggy holds, is being king of the pompous a**es.
Shilo
0
said
0
Also purchasing a fleet of long range bombers and jet interceptors. Purchasing 5 nuclear powered subs would also be a smart move. Thats nuclear powered not nuclear armed for those anti-nuke folks out there. We need to show the world we mean business. The world will not be so diplomatic with Canada's resource wealth in the future.
Jason Daniel Baker, Toronto
0
said
0
But I agree with the Northern development strategy as a continuation of the National Policy, i.e. the nationbuilding exercise begun under Sir John A.Macdonald and continued under Sir Wilfrid Laurier which had similar goals.
What you need under such a strategy is not merely bold announcements. You need infrastructure (in the 1800s this meant building a railroad) to connect the country together and you need people (in the 1800s this meant thousands of immigrants mostly) to go there to live and work.
The Prime Minister is saying he will do something like this. The key questions are will he do anything of substance and will he even have the chance to?
We have already seen him ship undocumented workers out of this country by the hundreds. Is that going to be his attitude in future?
Tono
0
said
0
Adam in Ottawa
0
said
0
Jessica
0
said
0
Sponsorship scandal anyone? Benefitting from NAFTA, GST revenues, the biggest period of economic growth since the Second World War, and a massive increase in demand for our commodities (including oil from the oil sands), gave the previous liberal gov'ts revenues, it had nothing at all to do with any policies they enacted, in fact, they opposed most of the economic policies from which they benefitted!
KMC (Markham, ON)
0
said
0
The only reason this issue was raised was an attempt, by the Liberal mouthpieces in the Canadian media, to detract from what Harper is doing, in the North...attempting to reinforce Canada's claim to the Arctic.
They resent giving Harper credit for anything positive.
my take on this
0
said
0
Lies and spin, the Conservative Party of Canada's motto under Stephen Harper.
Rob
0
said
0
I can see from a mile away, that the Liberals are totally scared that the PM is being looked at by the majority of Canadians as doing a good job.
So much so, that they are posting and voting their thumbs up/down, just to be anti PC. Anyone with half a brain can see that the North is a huge part of our future, if we can hold on to it.
Stop being so party driven, and just back up our Country, for the right reasons.
Bill in BC
0
said
0
Ralph in Regina
0
said
0
Can you say "media-friendly".
I wonder who else at CTV is looking for a patronage Senate seat?
Alex (Toronto)
0
said
0
DND
0
said
0
Liberal scams and mismangement of money and DND contracts (ie Sea King Helos) has crippled our forces for years to come.
Bob S. Florida, U.S.A.
0
said
0
Wake up people, Ottawa cares no more for you then Washington does about us.
BOTH capitals are controlled by big business, and lobbyist.
And trust me, the U.S. has no intention of planting our flag in Canada! LOL!
Richard L. Provencher
0
said
0
Michael. Cambridge ON
0
said
0
Also I find it interesting why it is always him making these kind announcment which clearly show PMO's tight grip on ministry.
Hmmmm..... Look forward to Harper's retirement anyhow.
Molly
0
said
0
"When you state "coalition crap" you show your ignorance of our parliamentay system as the coalition represented the majority of Canadians approx 68% vs.the 38% that the C minority represents."
Well if we use your logic, 0% of the population voted for the coalition. Also, you can be sure that someone voting Liberal did not count on their vote being lumped in with the NDP and Bloc vote in an "us or them" deal. You can also bet that if the Liberals were voted in with 38% you would have no problem with that. You lost the election, the Conservatives won democratically so suck it up. We're discussing the Northern Canada that the Liberals entirely forgot existed. Harper's taking care of business, as the Prime Minister should. He's looking after all Canadian interests.
Gord. Robson
0
said
0
with Prime Minister Harper and
his cabinet for for being proactive in regards to our claim to the north.
As a senior I have seen enough
over the years to know if our elected government does not show our presence in the Arctic then
other countries will!
Good work Mr. Harper and your cabinet for a great job!
reidjr
0
said
0
The liberals are no better they made mistakes in the past.Even now they have made some mistakes.
Roger Wilson
0
said
0
Who will pay for this working Canadians are already taxed at 60% of their income ( thats all taxes a little more in Ontario with 8% PST.) With a 50 billion deficit and no debt repayment in the near future.. WHO WILL PAY ... the few left working. With greater and greater welfare and native costs. You better get used to 80% tax rate and then go live on the streets but we won't have any streets because no money for them. REMEMBER ONLY ONE TAX PAYER ... SPENDERS !!!!!!!!!!!
Robert from Toronto
0
said
0
Harper does what Liberals and NDP tell him to do.
0
said
0
SK Doc
0
said
0
GJS - Markham
0
said
0
Even those who voted for the Bloc are tax payers into the Canadian treasury and they had every right to participate in the coalition and throw the Cons out of office for their incompetence. (By the way, Harper tried to woo the Bloc into helping him remove the Liberals from office when he was in the opposition.
And as far as for interest in the Arctic, Pierre Elliot Trudeau was the one who had a great love and interest in the Arctic.
Quit swallowing Harper's propoganda and look at his abysmal record on most everything including climate change which is the greatest threat to the Arctic.
Linda in Vancouver
0
said
0
It is very clear to me that to many people think only people they like can have good ideas,and that every idea from someone they don't like absolutely must be a bad idea.
reidjr
0
said
0
Some of these issues go back to when the liberals were in power.
Julia in AB
0
said
0
Of course, we still have a lot of thing to worry about such as loss of jobs, health care and recession, but claiming the artic passage that belongs to Canada is very urgent and important. Also, it is not a simple task to do and we do not have much time for it. Our government should make all possible efforts and recourses as well as work effectively with all level of all entities to put the plan to claim our artic in motion and make it happen.
We do not have much time and the 2013 deadline to make our claim for the arctic is approaching. Should we temporarily forget about the wrong thing in the past and focus on discussing about methods, feasible plans and actions in order claim that the arctic belongs to our country?
Please think about the long-term impact on security for our country in the future and our children’s future. We would not only be very sad and regretful, it would be a shame on us if we miss this opportunity to claim artic passage that belongs to our country.
Taxpayers will be happy to see their tax dollars are used to protect their country, not wasted in elsewhere. Also, Russia has no legal right to declare that North Pole belongs to Russia by simply using the robot, which placed its flag at the North Pole.
Arctic belongs to Canada!
Cheech Calgary
0
said
0
keith
0
said
0
al
0
said
0
allan
0
said
0
Disgusting whiners!