News Sections
Clinton returning to U.S. with freed journalists
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(69)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Aug. 4 2009 9:36 PM ET
North Korea has released two American journalists who have been imprisoned in the country for months, and they are on their way back to the United States.
The move comes after former U.S. president Bill Clinton arrived in the country in an attempt to secure the release of 32-year-old Laura Ling and 36-year-old Euna Lee, the two American journalists who were arrested along the North Korean-Chinese border in March.
A spokesperson for Clinton said the former president and the two journalists are en route to Los Angeles as of Tuesday evening.
The release of the journalists was a sign of North Korea's "humanitarian and peaceloving policy," the state-run Korean Central News Agency said.
The country's reclusive leader Kim Jong Il agreed to pardon the women after meeting with Clinton Tuesday.
The two women were accused of sneaking into North Korea and committing "hostile acts." They had been reporting on women and children who had defected into China from North Korea at the time of their arrest.
Both were sentenced to 12 years of hard labour in June. It is believed that U.S. officials have been working on securing their release ever since.
Clinton made a surprise visit to Pyongyang on Tuesday after arriving in the North Korean capital on an unmarked private jet. He was there to secure the release of Ling and Lee.
In Pyongyang, he was greeted by Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kye Kwan, as well as by North Korea's deputy speaker of parliament.
State-run media reported that Clinton and the North Korean leader had "exhaustive" talks, including a "wide-ranging exchange of views on matters of common concern."
It was also reported that Kim thanked Clinton for "courteously" delivering a verbal message from U.S. President Barack Obama, though White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs denied that a message had been sent.
Clinton's trip to North Korea was not publicly announced, though his arrival was confirmed to reporters by a senior U.S. official earlier Tuesday.
Also on Tuesday, Gibbs said Obama would make no comment "while this solely private mission to secure the release of two Americans is on the ground."
There was some hope that, if successful, Clinton's visit to Pyongyang could help the U.S. and North Korea move closer together on other diplomatic issues, including the country's controversial nuclear program.
"This is a very potentially rewarding trip. Not only is it likely to resolve the case of the two American journalists detained in North Korea for many months, but it could be a very significant opening and breaking this downward cycle of tension and recrimination between the U.S. and North Korea," said Mike Chinoy, author of "Meltdown: The Inside Story of the North Korean Nuclear Crisis."
In the U.S., Republican Senator Lindsey Graham also expressed hope that Clinton's trip to Pyongyang could yield other dividends, beyond the release of the two American journalists.
"Maybe we can build on this and do something better with nuclear weapons," Graham said Tuesday during an interview with NBC television. "I don't know if this is the beginning of something bigger."
CTV's Joy Malbon said that Clinton's visit to Pyongyang was more than just a photo-op for the North Korean leader.
"This legitimizes North Korea," Malbon told CTV News Channel from Washington. "This gives them what they've always wanted from the United States and that's respect."
Tuesday's visit was Clinton's first trip to North Korea, though his administration had relatively good relations with Pyongyang.
In 2000, former U.S. secretary of state Madeline Albright visited Pyongyang and New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, travelled to North Korea twice in the 1990s to secure the release of detained Americans.
Both Richardson and former vice president Al Gore had been named as possible envoys to North Korea to bring back Lee and Ling.
U.S. relations with North Korea deteriorated during the two terms served by former U.S. president George W. Bush.
Ling and Lee were working for the California-based Current TV at the time of their arrest.
The families of the detained journalists had pleaded for their release, citing the fact that Lee has a young daughter and Ling has a medical condition.
Laura Ling is the sister of Lisa Ling, a reporter who is a special correspondent for the Oprah Winfrey Show and a former co-host of "The View."
With files from CTV News Channel and The Associated Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(69)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Captain Giggles
0
said
0
It's amazing at what can be accomplished when you open the doors for friendly dialogue and cooperation instead of hostile posturing and mindless rhetoric.
Hat's off to Mr.Clinton.
Tom Turek
0
said
0
Roger T
0
said
0
Where is Opra when Laura Ling needs her the most. Isn't she the reporter Opra used to film some documentary for her show. Typical of the Rich and Famous, use others for your own purpose and abandon them they need you the most.
Buba
0
said
0
James B
0
said
0
Raj
0
said
0
ADM Saskatchewan
0
said
0
Levi
0
said
0
Ex-Pat
0
said
0
Rick in NB
0
said
0
Where's the compassion Roger? These ladies were given 12 years hard labor for illegaly crossing a border. Why should Oprah have anything to do with this? If you got in trouble outside of Canada, would you expect your employer to come to your aid?
These two young ladies were doing their job, and often for a jouralist it means stretching rules. North Korea is using them for bargining chips. This is all a political chess game.
So i ask you again. Where's the compassion?
The Whiteman
0
said
0
david sawkiw[saskatchewan farmer]
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
Although he's making it with a spiked mallet, the point "Roger T" is putting forth, I think, has to do with the sheer stupidity of two "vanity reporters" (read: quasi journalists who risk their safety or that of others to self-promote) who have now allowed themselves to be used as pawns or bargaining chips, thus requiring the intervention of U.S. diplomatic efforts...from the likes of bull-crap artist Bill Clinton.
If they actually knew what they were doing, and weren't so foolishly reckless, they wouldn't be incarcerated in North Korea right now. Journalistic brilliance wasn't a factor here.
As for Oprah, I think his point has to do with the alleged relative silence of a billion-dollar cultural hero who usually takes pride in certain righteous causes.
----------------
End Note: "Compassion" is something misunderstood and regularly misapplied by liberals. Thanks for the whiney treat.
Zippy
0
said
0
Mish
0
said
0
Talking to your enemies instead of snubs and dropping bombs is crucial sometimes if you ever hope
to attain peace or accomplish what seems the impossible
Gov Bill Richardson has faced the enemy many times too for talks, with many prisoners being released as a result of those talks !
Its nice to see instead of what
Bush and Cheney did for 8 years
snubbing countries and dropping bombs!
Paul, MTL
0
said
0
I think Clinton is a good choice. He is by far one of most well connected people in the world. His global experience and vast knowledge of multiple subjects is an asset in situations like these. I also think there is a deal somewhere in here for NK. Sadly, both Democratic & Republican administrations have tried to broker deals with NK and got nothing in return.
While is past indiscretions were a personal failure to him and his family. I never really thought much of it. I also feel that this is really silly to use it as a way to judge anything else he does.
Go get'em Bill!!!
Kevin in T.O.
0
said
0
Jeffery
0
said
0
Richard
0
said
0
In response to your comments:
'Where is Opra when Laura Ling needs her the most. Isn't she the reporter Opra used to film some documentary for her show. Typical of the Rich and Famous, use others for your own purpose and abandon them they need you the most'
You're thinking of Lisa Ling, not Laura Ling.
Dave from NB- A have not and never will province
0
said
0
First of all, Laura has a sister Lisa. Lisa is the one Oprah used for the documentaries and secondly, Oprah usually takes on a subject that she can do something about. She has done a lot of good with her monies and influence and unless you know her personally, I don't think it is proper to comment on anything you don't know.
The two reporters were trying to get information on a subject that would have given them notariety and got caught doing it. That is too bad but if you get caught with your fingers in the cookie jar, you have to pay the price. In the western world the sentence seems harsh for sure but they were not in the western world where our rules and punishments apply.
GP
0
said
0
All about optics at this point, but damn is this entertainment.
jenn
0
said
0
They were on a border, doing a piece on the trafficking of women, not to "self-promote" as some have said. Let's not let this go to waste and let some attention end up on what they were working on. Women and children are trafficked at alarming rates into the sex trade.
What these women were doing was REAL investigating journalism, and were taken soley to be the bargaining chip with the US.
I hope they come home soon.
JL
0
said
0
Carter McKeague
0
said
0
Anonymous Al
0
said
0
"help me Obi-Wan Kenobi. You're my only hope"
David H in Ottawa
0
said
0
Citizen of Canada
0
said
0
The real question is why Mrs. Clinton is not the one out there??? Last time I checked she was the secretary of state, not her husband.
I like Obama but clearly the inexperience is starting to show. Its too bad, things like this will show next time the elections come around...
Rick in NB, Ste Marie
0
said
0
By feeling emotions for two journalists caught under questionable cirmunstances, you call me "whiney". That's about par for your post.
I suppose that doing an article on the traficing of women and children for sexs is also whiney. Compassion is what i feel for these ladies. Maybe you should brush up on your definition of compassion.
Sorry Prof but when it comes down to it, your just another "Anything But Liberal" poster.
Tails
0
said
0
Do you know how !!%^@(#*^$!! BUSY I AM?????
LT
0
said
0
MAL of TO
0
said
0
And pleaaase... enough of the 'accidental journalist' nonsense every time one of them gets tagged. They KNOW exactly where they are and are choosing to execute Gonzo Journalism methods. NK shoots down airliners over their territory, you think they're gonna let reporters walk out without a secret payoff.
Ross
0
said
0
Also if Clinton is about six feet tall and Looney Tunes is supposed to be about five -one to five- five,then he (LT) is standing on a box plus his high heels or Clinton is in a hole. We can't see their feet but.....
Andrea in Ottawa
0
said
0
Roger T
0
said
0
Get over it people, they broke the law and it's up to THAT country's law to punish law breakers.
To ALL journalist, start using common sense and stop putting yourselves on the line for the sake of money and fame.
Do the crime now do the time!
A trade?
0
said
0
Robin
0
said
0
Dan
0
said
0
bunny
0
said
0
Phil
0
said
0
Roadrobber
0
said
0
meerkat
0
said
0
Goldens
0
said
0
John W
Bridgetown NS
Roger T
0
said
0
Next mission, Iran with US hiker's held hostage. Will US citizens learn from others mistakes or will they take risk for the sake of fame.
What will the US do with Iran's situation, bow and submit or will they play hard ball!
Watchinfrom Dasideline
0
said
0
Ryan
0
said
0
Canadian Taxpayer Sigh
0
said
0
Bill is the Man!!!
Roger T
0
said
0
Ex-Presidents serve a useful purpose to current American Administrations.....
In other words, the current US Government is useless and weak. While the economy falters and the US is dead BROKE with no money left it's going around the globe begging and being less arrogant towards others. We now live in a different world with other super powers which puts the US in a tough position by walking on thin ice or should I say broken glass!
All good things come to and end, when times are good you should treat everyone with respect so you don't use up your lucky charms.
Randy
0
said
0
Bill Steedman
0
said
0
This is just smoke and mirrors with a good result. I don't doubt there were "unofficial" discussions held with the Koreans to feel them out on various policies. It's an effective way to communicate with a whack-job and still maintain deniability. Good for Clinton for doing his duty...
jason
0
said
0
cindyptolemy
0
said
0
Good to hear the good news but don't screw it up again America.
Dee
0
said
0
Bob S. Florida, U.S.A.
0
said
0
Kim
0
said
0
US surrenders to NK.
0
said
0
reece
0
said
0
Love your country.
david sawkiw[saskatchewan farmer]
0
said
0
We ought to make him president!
frank d.
0
said
0
ARJAY
0
said
0
What detractors don't seem to realize is that this demonstrates that N. Korea is willing to negotiate. This is a symbolic gesture on their part. The reason is fairly clear: Kim Jong Il is sick,and doesn't need foreign relation problems compounding what will be a problematic future for him. By turning down the burner on his foreign realtion problems, he will have more time to address issues concerning his son's succession to the leadership.
So Bush's confrontational approach got the West exactly nowhere- worse, it led to missle launches and saber-ratting. Obama's policy of rational negotiation and compromise has worked. The U.S. and N. Korea can now sit down and hav substantive talks around nuclear issues.
Count this as a foreign policy triumph for Obama.
Natty
0
said
0
Hank
0
said
0
Just an observation on the pictures showing old South Koreans carrying posters. Those weren't exactly made on their home computers. Both sides of the issue were exploiting the situation.
SJW
0
said
0
Lz in Edmonton
0
said
0
The US has been pushing Korea to meet them always on "their" terms. 6 party talks. UN Sanctions. etc etc. Even calling North Korea the part of "axis of evil."
Reverse it. If another country was "forcing us" to meet on their terms, accept "international rule" when those same rules didn't apply, called us names, you too would push back ANY way you can.
What the pictures to me show is respect. Kim appreciating the fact that an ex-president asked for the americans personally and, if you can forgive me, not a woman asking for them. This is a very male dominated and crazy society. By showing the respect, they in turn released the prisoners.
Now what would happen if all countries went and met this way and talked? In the Reagan years, he personally called or wrote the USSR. It's the "let's talk" versus "you better do this or else we will do this BS" that worked.
Kindergarten rules apply, not the bully on the street. Unfortunately, though I love the USA, the bully factor just DOES NOT WORK with nut jobs like Kim. Perhaps Iran, Iraq, Bin Laden, et el should be dealt with in the same manner. However, the back up plan, ie. war, should always be the last resort, not the first.
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
You unabashed, card-carrying liberals (a previous self-description of yours) who wake up angry at conservatives need a day to feel good about yourselves...so I'll let your reply comment stand. Enjoy.
------------
@ Reece:
Nice speech. I'm sure its misguided and misinformed contents keep your partisan jets fueled. (No sane individual wants Obama to fail. Limbaugh was talking about the implementation of his "leftist" policies.) Get a grip.
The Chretien reference was hilarious, though. Does he rank higher on your Political Hero List than Trudeau?
------------
@ ARJAY
I admire your ideological enthusiasm.
Bill Clinton whispers into Kim Jong Il's ear and serves as the catalyst in something that EVERYONE predicted was going to happen (the release of two female amateur vanity "journalists"), and you're recording it as a globe-saving triumph that shall beget eternal peace and tranquility.
Nice. Bottle that stuff.
stan wilder
0
said
0
I thank that we live in a country where democracy, freedom of speech, & civil liberties. Wait a second thats the US. Ok I'm still thankful.
However I think that in this case thanks should be given to where its truly owed. The Obama office. No foreign mission is done without the express approval & planning of the white house. Clinton or not.
Mike
0
said
0
USE YOUR HEADS
0
said
0
IT'S NOT CANADIAN MONEY!!! Most former U.S. presidents have ALWAYS been used in one form or another after having left office; why should this concern we Canadians? He did NOT step on ANY toes ... neither Hilary's nor Obama's because he DID NOT GO WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM THE CURRENT U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS!
jimestep
0
said
0
Of course they'll be no strings attached ---- More goodies for the Military and hardline party leaders --- nothing for the folks.
Obama like Clinton will trust and NOT VERIFY!!!!!!!!!!!
Rockstar
0
said
0
It's really nice to hear about something good in the news for a change. Maybe you don't have to take up arms to achieve peace after all?