News Sections
Texting puts drivers at serious risk, study finds
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(63)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Jul. 28 2009 10:02 AM ET
There is more evidence that using a cellphone while driving puts motorists at high risk of getting into an accident.
Particularly if they're sending or receiving text messages, which a new study says is the most dangerous threat to drivers since alcohol.
A driver is 23 times more likely to get into a car accident if they text when they are behind the wheel of their vehicle, according to research conducted by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute (VTTI).
In fact, text messaging forced the driver's eyes away from the road for the longest period of time -- about 4.6 seconds over a six-second interval.
"This equates to a driver traveling the length of a football field at 55 mph without looking at the roadway," the study concludes.
The report, released Tuesday, found that drivers who operate heavier vehicles or trucks are most at risk from driving distractions. For example, these drivers were nearly 6 times more likely to crash while dialing on a cell phone. Meanwhile, motorists operating a smaller vehicle are only three times more likely to get into an accident.
Using or reaching for an electronic device was associated with a 6.7 times increased risk for a crash or near crash.
The findings were based on a large-scale, naturalistic driving study which used cameras and other instruments in the personal vehicles of participants. The study monitored eye movements to determine how long an activity kept a person's eyes away from the road.
"Given recent catastrophic crash events and disturbing trends, there is an alarming amount of misinformation and confusion regarding cellphone and texting use while behind the wheel of a vehicle," Tom Dingus, director of the VTTI, said in a statement.
"The findings from our research at VTTI can help begin to clear up these misconceptions as it is based on real-world driving data."
The study says that other published reports have exaggerated the dangers of talking while driving.
"Talking and listening to a cell phone is not nearly as risky as driving while drunk at the legal limit of alcohol," the study says, pointing out that drunk driving puts drivers seven times more at risk of getting into a fatal accident.
"Using simple fatal crash and phone use statistics, if talking on cell phones was as risky as driving while drunk, the number of fatal crashes would have increased roughly 50% in the last decade instead of remaining largely unchanged."
The study makes several recommendations to drivers and law enforcement agencies such as:
- Banning texting in all moving vehicles
- Using a "true hands-free" system where voice-activation is used to control cell phones
- Avoiding all activities that draw a driver's eyes away from the roadway
- Banning all cell phone used for newly-licensed teen drivers
"Our research has shown that teens tend to engage in cell phone tasks much more frequently and in much more risky situations than adults," the study says. "Our studies indicate that teens are four times more likely to get into a related crash or near crash event than their adult counterparts."
The study also notes that teens are the most frequent senders of text messages and will reach the driving age in large numbers.
The study, authored by Dr. Rich Hanowski, will be presented at the First International Conference on Driver Distraction and Inattention in Sweden on September 28 and 29.
The data was collected from video cameras in the cabs of long-haul trucks that were monitored for 18 months, and comes on the heels of a number of high-profile accidents that were blamed on texting.
Past incidents
Last fall, investigators in Los Angeles found that a commuter train engineer sent a text message 22 seconds before the train crashed head-on into a freight train, killing 25 people.
The crash occurred after the train ran a red signal as it travelled through the San Fernando Valley. The incident was the deadliest rail crash in the United States since 1993.
On May 8, 62 people were injured in Boston when one trolley rear-ended another trolley after it ran a red signal.
The driver of the trolley is believed to have been sending a text message to his girlfriend. The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority has since banned drivers from carrying electronic devices on the job.
The Institute also calls for a complete ban on texting while driving. In the U.S., 14 states ban texting while driving, including California, Alaska and New Jersey.
In Canada, Quebec, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Nova Scotia have banned the use of cellphones while driving. A ban in Ontario will come into effect this fall.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(63)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
John Smith
0
said
0
dawn
0
said
0
carl
0
said
0
radha
0
said
0
Bad drivers in Ottawa
0
said
0
Kyle
0
said
0
I am from Western Canada where there is no Cell phone ban and our stats on collisions are very comparable to that of Eastern Canada. If they did in fact impose such a law here I would like to see how many officers enforce themselves, as everytime you see a cop drive by you in Edmonton, they are talking on their personal cell phones.
Not to mention we can barely keep up enforcing regular traffic laws and drinking and driving let alone talking and texting while driving.
I would rather have a guy talking on his cell phone drive by me that a guy on his speed bike doing 200KM/H sneak up on me.
Start enforcing real problems.
Joe
0
said
0
These so called studies are just plain useless.
realist
0
said
0
GWinnipeg
0
said
0
Isn't it obvious that you can't you're not "driving" if you're not watching the road so much as you are "blindly guiding a two tonne weapon"?
Any driver caught texting while driving should lose their license. Period.
B. Kelley, Ontario
0
said
0
CraigW
0
said
0
I can still remember the good old days when we use to just call people when we got home, or better yet just went and visited them.
judles
0
said
0
Frank Buchan (Vauxhall, Alberta by way of Ontario)
0
said
0
To anyone who doesn't find these activities distracting, you're lying to yourself and operating on the "finger crossing principle."
Pip
0
said
0
Regardless of how well you as a driver are protected inside the vehicle, others - other drivers and pedestrians - may be faced with a collision, where your 1000Kg(or more) vehicle travelling at 50Km/h or faster imparts all that kinetic energy into them. Not a pretty picture.
Eating, drinking, making a phone call, texting, knitting (yes, I knew a person who knitted while commuting!) take concentration away from the job at hand.
Ban all non-driving activities, and make our roads safer!
Jeff In Kingston
0
said
0
On a recent trip on the 400 a woman passed me, she had a Blackberry in her right hand and a map in her left. I am still wondering what she was steering her vehicle with travelling at over 120 KPH.
We have devices that prevent people from driving when impaired..maybe it is time that auto makers include electoronic jammers to prevent people from using these devices once the car is out of Park.
Pugfire
0
said
0
Gee who would have guessed??
DUH!!!!!!
Peter
0
said
0
Dave in Whitby
0
said
0
Steven in Halifax
0
said
0
Steve
0
said
0
Al
0
said
0
zeitgiest
0
said
0
Greg - Oshawa
0
said
0
And can't forgot the ones that are actually driving while drinking a beer!! We have many stupid people in this world.
Cathy
0
said
0
Suzanne T
0
said
0
CrackerJackLee
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
What you all fail to do is actually read the studies, you just simply rely on some tiny article from your local media. I dare you to find an study that claims talking on a cell phone in your hands is any less distracting (a signification correlation) than a hands-free device. Guess what - you would be hard pressed to find one.
So do us all a favor and stop whining about new laws. Even with good intentions, the people in power will always manage to screw it up.
Maritimer
0
said
0
boomer
0
said
0
tf
0
said
0
Isn't it obvious?????
Rick in NB, Ste Marie
0
said
0
The cell phone lobbyist are doing their jobs well. It doesn't matter how many accidents happen or how many lives are taken. Money is the bottom line.
Chris in Kingston
0
said
0
KJ in Kingston Ontario
0
said
0
Randy
0
said
0
James the prognosticator
0
said
0
Jim-Surrey
0
said
0
What happened to having a proper conversation with someone and what is that important that it can't wait till you get home to your computer to send an email if that is how you communicate?????????
Care
0
said
0
Bentbike
0
said
0
Glenn
0
said
0
Ross In Burlington
0
said
0
Doug in BC
0
said
0
It's a no brainer people.I doubt that enforcement would be easy,but,if the law is on the books,at least when there is an accident,appropriate charges can be laid.And,like DUI,insurance companies may have a case for denying insurance to those who don't drive with reasonable care and attention.
There are other reasons people are distracted.But this one is clear,and needs to be addressed NOW.Hand held phones chat is bad enough,but texting is INSANE.
Tom, Winnipeg
0
said
0
guppies
0
said
0
I see lots and lots of drivers using the cellular calling their friend while driving alone. Since they got nothing else to do.
And don't keep their eyes on the road.
Don't believe me ? Check it out yourself and you will agree to what I say.
you think?
0
said
0
How can I get to be a survey taker?
Sent from my phone while driv...
CRASh! oopss
Francine
0
said
0
Good grief.
Ron has the answer
0
said
0
tc
0
said
0
Denise in Calgary
0
said
0
Understandable from their perspective, but the laws have to be updated to deal with all of the distractions that drivers face by their own choice! Do people have to be killed before we start treating driving and texting like drunk driving?
stevo
0
said
0
First offence - loss of licence for a year, second offence - loss of licence for life, third offence - 10 years in prison.
If you want to text message fine, just don't do it while driving because I'll probably pay the price for your idiocy.
Rick in NB, Ste Marie
0
said
0
@ Kyle,
It's very easy to nail somebody using a cell phone during an accident. The police just get the phone company's records and see if the phone was in use at the time.
Mac in Ottawa
0
said
0
To be in contact is great but to take survival training for dodging cellphone/texting drivers, bikers, people walking on the street or in stores is ridiculous !
lets all be a little more considerate of others !
Daisy in TO
0
said
0
MAL of TO
0
said
0
Do not text, cell, read the paper, put on makeup or anything else that has nothing to do with driving. Yes, you CAN have some quiet time for awhile, you do not need to be active constantly. Make the penalty meaningful... money isn't equal, picking up trash on the highway in a red jumper is.
No seat belt, canceled insurance retroactively to one hour before the ticket so if you get in an accident without a belt, you are in big trouble. That will solve that problem.
Drinking and Driving. Zero tolerance. Driving while suspended for DUI gets 2 years jail time. Mandatory.
Yes, this is being a hardass... so what. Doesn't the Ministry of T always tell us driving is a PRIVILEGE not a RIGHT. Treat it as such.
Minimum size, weight and IQ for SUV drivers couldn't hurt either. Seems to be one of them or a black high-end car involved in almost every 400 series accident.
Dan from Northern Ont
0
said
0
Chris
0
said
0
Sam
0
said
0
Jackytar
0
said
0
Cold in MB
0
said
0
Nanook - The Freak Of Nature
0
said
0
They don't realize that an airbag can still kill them, and broken bones HURT! What will evolve from this study? People still drink and drive, don't they?
Everyone should study physics, to learn what two objects doing 60 MPH look like when they meet...
wally from Montreal
0
said
0
Keith in Brampton
0
said
0
Sadly, any real enforcement will almost have to be post-accident.
Punishment for texting that causes an accident should be at least as great as for impaired driving. Further, it should, in provinces with no-fault laws, exempt the driver from no-fault status and should be one of the exemptions from coverage in insurance policies (for the driver, not the victim). i.e., your policy would cover damage to the other vehicle / person, but the driver's own vehicle / personal damage is not covered. Write off your car & put yourself in a wheelchair? Too bad, buddy - you're on your own!
And insurance companies should be able to deny coverage to anyone with a texting conviction.
CYL
0
said
0
Two hands on the wheel and eyes on the road is what I was taught.
That's what should be enforced.
Ron In Niagara
0
said
0
As a cell phone user I DO find it very distracting while driving to use just the cell phone --not to mention texting which I do not do .
I have used my cell phone while driving in the past and agree is extreamley distracting not to mention stupid and dangerous , and because I recognize this which did put my life in danger have ended this practice.
However , I now use a bluetooth wireless headset , I now drive with full awareness and NO distraction what so ever , but still agree texting is not only Stupid , BUT deadly and not only to yourself but others.