World -
News Sections
UN chief criticizes G8 climate change plan
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(78)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. Jul. 9 2009 12:09 PM ET
UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is criticizing Group of Eight nations for not going far enough in setting targets to fight climate change, a move that creates a bad example for developing nations.
On Wednesday, the leaders reached an agreement recognizing that average global temperatures should be kept from rising by more than 2 degrees Celsius from preindustrial times.
However, the leaders made no short-term commitments to reach that goal. They also made no firm commitments to help poor countries deal with climate change.
"I sincerely hope and I urge, and I'm going to urge, that the leaders of G8 are responsible to lead this campaign," Ban said. "They should be able to provide financial support, technological support" so that developing countries can mitigate greenhouse gas emissions.
The G8 leaders also agreed that the world's major economies would take "robust" midterm reductions on their way to reducing 80 per cent of heat-trapping carbon emissions by 2050.
Still, despite recommendations from a UN panel, the leaders made no firm targets.
The UN panel had said global emissions must be reduced between 25 per cent and 40 per cent by 2020 to keep average global temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees above preindustrial levels 150 years ago.
Ban said the G8 policies are "not sufficient enough."
"This is the science. We must work according to the science. This is politically and morally imperative and a historic responsibility for the leaders for the future of humanity, even for the future of planet Earth," he said.
John Drexhage, with the International Institute for Sustainable Development, said China and India have a "wait-and-see" attitude towards the G8.
"They're saying 'We've yet to be shown that in fact you can reduce greenhouse gas emissions and still make strong economic progress,'" Drexhage told CTV News Channel.
He said if the G8 can prove it works then China and India come on board quicker.
Trade talks
G8 leaders opened their exclusive club Thursday to five developing economies -- Brazil, China, India, South Africa and Mexico.
In addition to climate change and development aid, global economic growth and international trade were expected to be discussed.
"We reaffirm our commitment to maintain and promote open markets and reject all protectionist measures in trade and investment," according to a draft of the joint statement signed by 17 nations, including the Group of Eight industrialized countries and five key emerging market economies.
The five developing countries, along with special invitee Egypt, say developing countries were hurt by protectionist moves that have occurred during the current economic crisis.
They called for stronger multilateral trading, which they said would play a role in promoting development and reducing poverty.
"We are concerned with the present state of the world economy, which submits the developing countries to an inordinate burden resulting from a crisis they did not initiate," the G5 said in a statement Wednesday.
The final document is to be released later in the day.
With files from The Associated Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(78)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Don from Ottawa
0
said
0
Barack
0
said
0
MJ
0
said
0
Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
0
said
0
I believe our Prime Minister
Harper is right in saying that we need to give the
STIMULUS a chance to work before pumping more money when it may not be needed.
Good advice that the G8 should heed!
Prime Minister Harper appears to be well respected
by the world leaders, this is nice to see!
Lucky_Eddie
0
said
0
Anthony
0
said
0
And how about tens if not hundreds of thousands of people now unemployed in North America and Europe, due to cheap, many time of dubious quality products we now have to buy from so called "developing countries", while the very good, traditional companies simply had to close their doors, because of this unrestricted import of crap which is coming at us from China and elsewhere, like a tidal tidal wave ? They do not talk about that !
It has been a one way street for much too long !
A Koster - BC
0
said
0
Canada Goose Whistler
0
said
0
Harper definitely doesn't get it. Harper has been lying to us about our economy for along time now. he gives the Canadian public false numbers to encourage spending. Then the real numbers come out. From no deficit at christmas to 155.9 billion is a pretty big lie. People that have gone out & spent only to find themselves unemployed. Because of his many lies I skip over article where he speaks & turn off the volume when he speaks on TV.
It's pointless to listen to his lies anymore.
All the G5 leaders are intelligent enough that they don't listen to him either.
He's an embarrassment to Canada.
he proved hes not a leader by folding to the pressure of the opposition, no one held a gun to his head, he just wanted to hang onto power. He has no interest in the well being of Canadian.
He only cares about his job.
MJ
0
said
0
WorldVision supporter in Nova Scotia
0
said
0
Stop already
0
said
0
The more u make them the topic of ur discussion, they less likely they r to help themselves.
Bren
0
said
0
Scott/Hfx.
0
said
0
Rick in NB
0
said
0
"CTV #1 FAN"
0
said
0
The World Trade Organization needs to hold communist China and the other "piddly-squat" nations to the same rules/standards as they impose on everybody else. "Made in China" has cost the world huge job losses, ruined economies and subjected consumers to toxic and poor quality products that have injured/killed people/pets. The product life of the "so-called" cheaper merchandise is 1/3rd of that of the same product when "we" manufactured it-so in the long run it isn't cheap having to replace 'Made in China" cheap 3 times more in a 5 year span than you did before. And all the junk ends up in the landfills..so where are the environmentalists on "that" issue "Made in China"????
Developing countries had better stop using their "lame" excuse to get away with murder while holding their hands out for more charity while knifing the "G8" in the back with a smirk at the same time. People are wising up to the tricks they have been pulling for too long now and see them for what they "really" are. Leeches and liars!
Niagara George
0
said
0
The only time Harper does not look at the camera is when he is speaking. Even he feels guilty about some of the lies!
Sean Webb
0
said
0
I support providing aid to underdeveloped nations and those who faces famine and natural disasters. However, "adopting" children through agencies like WorldVision doesn't develop their nation. It converts them to Christians. When people are sick and starving you don't show up with bibles and say "See. My god is better than your god. If you ready my bible I'll give you food."
Governments need to help these nations develop their communication systems, healthcare systems and build their economies. The goal is that we respect their culture and help them build a society of their own choosing to help their people. Not bible thumping.
JFC
0
said
0
Michael
0
said
0
I have to agree 100% with PM Harper when he says give a little more time for the stimulus to take effect otherwise we are just digging a bigger hole to get ourselves out of. Prudent talk from a prudent leader - refreshing for a change!
Niagara George
0
said
0
The junk from China is here because we buy it. We are far more worried about price than quality or Canadian jobs.
There is a Made in Canada version of every product imported from China. It isn't in the dollar store or WalMart. Shop in a real store and you'll find it.
WalMart lost billions in Germany and finally closed all their stores. Germans simply refused to participate in the destruction of their own economy.
We could do the same!
Johnnie Oil
0
said
0
JFC
0
said
0
That's completely false concerning WorldVision
... I have looked into them and they do not attempt to convert recipients of aid to Christianity. If they did I would never have given them money.
As far as other NGOs, like CCF, I cannot speak for and some may well be a front for Christian expansionism? If so I would suspect it is the action of a few within their organization and not any official policy per se.
PBW
0
said
0
One wonders if, along with the invitation, they were instructed to a) turn up; and b) not be late for any photo ops.
Matt In NS
0
said
0
Re: Canada Goose Whistler
The only things that are laughable are your comments. I come across them every day, and every day they are a little more ridiculous than the day before. And here you go again spewing out hatred against Mr Harper in the comments section of an article that doesn’t even mention his name. The article doesn't even mention Canada for crying out loud.
As for Harper I can take him or leave him, but you Mr Canada Goose Whistler, have an affection for the liberal party that truly baffles my mind, some days I honestly wonder if you love the reds more than your own kids.....
notapegger
0
said
0
Shaun
0
said
0
Do these guys think they're gods or something?
WorldVision supporter in N.S.
0
said
0
Kevin in T.O.
0
said
0
Mollyf
0
said
0
jon
0
said
0
Ryan in Burlington
0
said
0
If I want to give to a charity, then let it be MY choice who that money goes to. Charity starts at home!
Here is a solution: if the Canadian government wants to give my tax money away, then we should be able to check a box on our tax form as to where we want the government to send it...along with a tax reciept we can claim the following year. Seems fair!
As for the climate change debate, Ban Kai-moon, as well as the rest of the world, don't seem to understand that developed nations contribute A LOT LESS to greenhouse and climate changing pollution than the developing world! China, India, Mexico, etc create more than the developed world, this is fact.
So UN, get off our backs and go back to your corrupt little world. Canada and the US should get out of the UN, plain and simple!
OhC
0
said
0
Are you aware of how the world works? You said Harper lied and gave us false numbers to encourage spending....how do you think a recession ends? People need to spend to support the economy and give it a boost! No one has given any real numbers that you can say that they were right. No one has any clue and some have said the economy is turning around but others have said it isn't over yet. We have a deficit but it is needed to keep companies and people employed. Some companies had to go under or have been shut down for now but that happens. Provincial and federal goverments have to carry the blame. In ontario, McGuinty is implementing a harmonized tax to boost more money for the province to take from the taxpayers for more infostructure...hopefully they use it for that and not lining their pockets. You have to pay if you want to keep your job and your family fed. That's just the way it is and you can only blame the americans for having such a mucked up stock market system that allowed things to get where they are and it affected the world. Your comments are laughable and Canada is in the best position for a recovery before anyone else will be.
Wade Ens
0
said
0
meerkat
0
said
0
a)understand the urgency of climate change.
or
b)believe that dealing with it, is a hindrance to economic developement.
Either way, there are tough and expensive choices that have to be made. The longer we leave them on the back burner, the more urgent and the more expensive they will become.
Do we love our children & grand children enough NOT TO HOBBLE THEM WITH THESE PROBLEMS? They will face enough problems from this planet in the future. Why make their lives uncertain, only to make ours more convenient?
Think about it.
Please.
annie, ontario
0
said
0
Regulations will definitely kill capitalism.
Patrick
0
said
0
Red X
0
said
0
Developing countries should be reluctant to do anything that inhibits it's domestic governance...
al in ontario
0
said
0
politicians with morals.
that is an axymoron
Paul in Brantford
0
said
0
Time to invent a new scam of the public.
Duane Oshawa
0
said
0
Thank God the politicians have not given in to the scare mongering of the politically motivated UN, and other self serving agencies with vested interest in global warming.
Canada's biggest worry should be, what if this cooling trend continues!!
Roadrobber
0
said
0
Mario - Rockland
0
said
0
80% of people cram at the last minute for an exam, that's our history. The same applies to climate change. We will never take anything seriously until it is too late, then we will panic. That's the human way.
Alex (Toronto)
0
said
0
And we need less protectionism, not more. The lesson we learned from the Depression is that sheltering low-wage jobs drives out good-paying jobs. Protectionism just buys time for our competitors to get ahead of us in technology. It has failed every time it has been tried and it won't work this time either. Developed countries succeed through innovation, not by clinging to outmoded industries and technologies.
Roland Godin
0
said
0
Numéro-Brunswick
WorldVision Supporter in N.S.
0
said
0
Thank you CTV!!
Fred N.
0
said
0
Roger T
0
said
0
It will and will never change, GREED with overpower thoughts or solutions.
Dave, Ottawa
0
said
0
Just because your IPCC panel, composed of government bureaucrats (not scientists), signed a document does not make it fact.
This AGW nonsense is diverting money and resources away from things that COULD actaully help the planet, namely, cutting REAL pollution - both air and water.
Edb
0
said
0
Canada OUT !!
Chris Ottawa
0
said
0
CAN'T YOU SEE IT'S A BIG SCAM!!
MikeAwesome00
0
said
0
-Thats what this all about for the UN and devolping nations. While I personally have questins regarding the true human impact of global warming, I do believe that we certainly should reduce our pollution for other, likely more serious reasons, like toxifing our bodies and the such. Groups like Greenpeace, who really do beleieve that humans are real contributors to climate change beleive greenhouse gases should be eliminated for their reasons.
Howver, the more comments and interviews I see from UN officals or those clammering for a carbon trade market, the less I am convinced that those groups are concerned about human or the worlds health. They seem to be primarily concerned about massive transfer of the worlds wealth to other nations or massive corporations.
If the UN wants a climate change plan all can agree to, should they organize it instead of only a group of 8 nations? I thought that was the purpose of the UN.. to debate and gain consenses on ideas, and not have the need for all these different groups trying their own things.
Nancy: Harper making Canada proud
0
said
0
Concern for the Planet
0
said
0
D.W.
0
said
0
People blaming China for job loss apparently forgot who caused the recession. Before pointing finger to others, you should look at yourself first.
Paying high price for products made locally doesn’t mean you are paying for high quality; you are probably paying for the greediness of the overpaid workers who is hurting our ability to compete. What special skills make a unionized auto worker worth $78/hour while less paid un-union workers make better cars? Specially they both in North American.
Time to look at ourselves, the so-called political leaders have no guts to deal real issue for long time, they let it slide now the economics rule will deal with them naturally – these unionized companies will be bankrupted and diminished, but time has been wasted since we didn’t use the technology advantage to build up our strength, and now they (China, India) catch up.
Look at the striking garbage workers at Toronto, how about black mail Toronto residents once a while by leaving the garbage uncollected at hot summer? All this is about asking a privilege no one can image – Get paid for the accumulated untaken sick leave. Political leaders, please deal with them in a real way. Let’s privatize them and get rid of the problem forever.
Mandosa
0
said
0
Ryan in Burlington
0
said
0
Really, what makes more sense, giving tax payer money to another country's poor, or giving the money to our OWN poor population???
This is an absolute joke and I am ashamed of this country trying to better the poor of other countries over the poor of our own country. Patriotism is thrown out the window when Bono is crying at your door begging for your money.
If we help poor Canadians, we will strenghten our country. If you keep giving our hard earned tax money to corrupt foreign countries, they will never try to fix their problems themselves. We have to stop enabling them.
As for global climate change...agreed, people like Gore are making money off this farce and the population is too stupid to realise this. It's a scam to make money. Take the rose colored glasses off people!!!
Dave in Newington
0
said
0
Don't really know where the hell you get you info....mebbe you would like to share it with us all????
I support three children via World Vision, one in Niger,one in Armenia and another in India....
I write to them all frequently and I can assure you that even thought World Vision is a Christian based org. the Bible thumping you claim to know so much about is a total figment of your imagination.
My kid's are Muslim and Hindu....but I suppose you will have something to say about that as well!
But all this is prolly the excuse you need for not helping out some child the other side of the world for the cost of a dozen beer a month
Please...W/V is one of the largest and most effective child aid agencies on the planet....don't bad mouth them unless it's something you can actually document !!
~David #1~
0
said
0
Felix
0
said
0
Bob,Calgary,Alberta
0
said
0
governments. Who would ever want to listen to the Secretary General of such an organization spouting unproven theories about global warming which the lefties and their propoganists have foisted on an unquestioning public. My goodness they are even afraid to call the so called problem "gloibal warming" and now opt for a less threatening description "climate change". Lets call a spade a spade and admit that global warming pacts are simple ploys to rape the Western economies to give wealth to the main supporters of the UN.
Johnnie Oil
0
said
0
Glenn in Winnipeg
0
said
0
Someone wrote the other day how the Cap and Trade system works, using golf as an analogy. He related .....
I never shoot over par playing a round of golf anymore. Whenever I finish a round, I phone my broker to purchase 'stroke credits' to reduce my score to par.
My broker buys strokes from a kid in Bangladesh, who apparently is a golf sensation. There must be a lot of golf courses there as well.
Anyway by paying $10 a stroke for stroke credits, I always shoot par.
My broker calls me once a day, sometimes twice a day to see if I want to play golf.
Brandon from Ontario
0
said
0
Trudy
0
said
0
Bill in BC
0
said
0
Now, we are all being preached to that the world is caught up in runaway global warming; that “life as we know it” is coming to an end. This is, of course, bovine excrement in great heaps. “These lurid accounts of a despoiled and poisoned planet accelerating in a headlong rush to doom” are advanced by persons with other agendas and politics at stake (James Hogan, “Kicking the Sacred Cow”, 2004, p. 243). This hijacking and misuse of science is typical among certain political lobby groups and unfortunately there are always scientists willing to pander to them, for whatever reason. I can’t even ascribe dishonest motives to the panderers as everyone, at some point, feels the need to make a difference in the world; but there is always a danger in extending authority in one field to other, unrelated fields. Unfortunately, this is what is happening today.
Proponents of climate change and global warming would have us believe that human influenced changes in the global climate are catastrophic and altering the permanent state of affairs. This is, of course, incorrect; climate is never static but ever-changing and, in fact, the world is cooler now than several hundred years ago-which mirrors the solar sunspot cycle but NOT atmospheric CO2 concentrations.
Without going into great detail, I think we should point out something about atmospheric CO2 that is ignored in the debate: The greenhouse effect is a NATURAL PROCESS! Without the greenhouse effect, to put things in perspective, the Earth would be about 33 degrees Celsius COOLER, meaning permanent ice on the equator.
Now for some numbers. Human activity adds about 30 billion tonnes of CO2 to the atmosphere yearly. This seems like a lot until you realize that nature adds about 1,800 billion tonnes yearly; and deals with the total through the natural functions of the biosphere; meaning that yearly human activity amounts to less than 2% of the total. And, by the way, water vapour has a grater effect on the greenhouse effect and is in atmospheric concentrations 10 times GREATER than CO2. So, which is the greater greenhouse gas and how will you tax that? Also, the rise in CO2 has taken place during a period of cooling NOT an increase in global temperature as some have claimed.
As for the statement that the science of global warming is conclusive; poppycock! The Leipzig Declaration (1995) states there is no “general scientific consensus about the importance of global warming” and “we cannot subscribe to the politically inspired worldview that envisages climate catastrophes and calls for hasty action”. As for U.S. President Clinton’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the report so gleefully pointed to by the doomsayers is fatally flawed:
a. the majority of signers were NOT climate scientists but political appointees;
b. the report was rewritten AFTER SIGNING to ensure the “correct” output;
c. the IPCC report contains numerous factual-science errors; and most damming
d. Frederick Seitz, former head of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, recorded “this report is not what it appears to be-it is not the version that was approved by the contributing scientists … I have never witnessed a more disturbing corruption of the peer-review process” (Wall Street Journal, 1996).
Furthermore, for a comprehensive review of how the IPCC process was corrupted see Fred Singer’s “The Road from Rio to Kyoto: How Climate Science was Distorted to Support Ideological Objectives” (2000). As well, a survey of climate specialist scientists by the German Metreorologisches Universitat Hamburg and Forschungszentium found that 67% of Canadian, 87% of German, and 97% of American scientists rejected the notion of global warming due to human activity.
And some would have you believe that the science is conclusive!
Some final thoughts: tighten up environmental laws and practices to reduce pollution and I’m onside. Devote more research and resources to clean energy projects and I’m onside. Put some resources into local clean energy production and pollution control and I’m onside. Put more into local food production and clean water projects, I’m onside. Put more into education, local and in traditionally disadvantaged areas and I’m onside. Let the average Canadian do more in these areas and I’m on side. Look at low tech solutions, and I’m onside (just because it’s hi-tech doesn’t make it the right tech. For some excellent older technology that is still suitable see www.lindsaybks.com.)
And most important, stop the fear mongering and distortions to support something that doesn’t exist.
Catwoman 37
0
said
0
The Swiss have done some contributing aid to
Africa.They have a few campaigns already on the go.
The funds are being used for the reduction of Malaria.
Are you not on facebook?
There is a campaign about it on facebook.
Catwoman 37
0
said
0
USA - Pledged 15 billion to aid poor farmers. The news article was in the NY times yesterday
UK & A few other countries have already pledged money.
In 2005 in Glen Eagles Scotland, Canada made a committment to end poverty by 2015.
We are to reach .7,
Canada cannot keep backing out on its international committments.
It will hurt our country's credibility.
If our credibility suffers, so does our international business and reputation with other countries.
Rick in NB
0
said
0
I wasn't going to comment anymore on this subject. But after reading your post i had to say something. Could you please explain why you only mention European countries getting flooded. Canada as USA are a G8 countries. Guess what,if Europe floods P.E.I to Florida will flood and that just the East Coast.
I agree that the G8 is covering their eyes on climate change, but they are the keepers of the planet. In the end they will have to face the inevitable.
GTA
0
said
0
Some lead most are just blind sheep!
0
said
0
YOU CAN'T FIGHT IT !!!!
Climate change is NOT a man made problem. When will these UN spin doctors stop trying to pawn off their 'Glo Bull' Kool Aid?
Climate change is a natural phenom and secondly it isn't warming up it is cooling down. Do your own homework ...search 'Dr. Timothy Ball Canadian Climatologist' and start educating yourself.
bcc sask
0
said
0
Ron in the West
0
said
0
Eyes wide Open
0
said
0
Levi
0
said
0
Ron in the West
0
said
0
Ron in the West
0
said
0
John Calgary
0
said
0
Garry in NS
0
said
0