News Sections
Ontario wants a cheaper nuke bid from AECL
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(24)
The Canadian Press
Date: Mon. Jun. 29 2009 6:15 PM ET
TORONTO Ontario is delaying plans to build two new nuclear reactors, saying Monday that Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.'s bid would cost billions more than the province is willing to pay as it hinted federal aid could help seal the deal.
AECL was the only one of three candidates to build the Darlington nuclear station reactors to properly address requirements around assuming responsibility for cost overruns, but that bid was still too expensive, said Energy Minister George Smitherman.
Ottawa, which earlier this year announced plans to put AECL's nuclear reactor business up for sale, may want to step in to allow AECL to make a more competitive bid, he added.
Once the government clarifies the future ownership of AECL, it must "sharpen their pencils substantially so that the people of the province of Ontario can renew their nuclear fleet with two new units from that company," Smitherman said.
"AECL is the government of Canada's company so, absolutely, the government of Canada is in the driver's seat with respect to giving AECL the opportunity to build new reactors in Ontario."
Smitherman wouldn't discuss the price tag attached to any of the offers or give a timeline for how long the postponement will last. He would only say the cost of the proposal was off "substantially, certainly by a measure of many billions."
The announcement comes as a surprise in a province that is spending $26 billion on a major expansion of nuclear power over the next two decades as it aims to generate 50 per cent of the province's electricity with that source.
Smitherman had said just last month that Ontario's plans to choose a company to refurbish its nuclear reactors wouldn't be affected by Ottawa's plans for a sale.
The future of AECL is widely considered to be tied to a successful Ontario bid.
The Organization of CANDU Industries, which represents the companies that would build parts for the new reactors, said Monday it was "extremely concerned" about how the move would impact the more than 30,000 workers in the industry.
"The member companies of OCI have invested heavily in this process and this delay will cause some of them considerable financial difficulty, possibly even bankruptcy," president Neil Alexander said in a statement.
Officials at AECL were not available for comment.
Smitherman insisted the announcement shouldn't be seen a shift away from nuclear, but stressed the province isn't going to build the new plants, expected to be up by 2018, "at any cost."
Steve Outhouse, a spokesman for federal Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt, said any discussions about costs rested with AECL, adding there was nothing that would push Ottawa to get involved at this stage.
Critics have said choosing AECL could mean higher costs, noting the price tag for building reactors has more than doubled in the last three years, and taxpayers risk being stuck with the bill.
NDP energy critic Peter Tabuns said Monday's move is an attempt to get a "massive bailout" from Ottawa for possible costs overruns by AECL, and that Smitherman "may be negotiating in public."
"They're going to try to stick us, through the federal budget, with the cost of overruns at this plant," Tabuns said.
The government's decision to put the plan on hold shows how much the costs for building nuclear plants have risen since an estimate of $6 billion in 2005, when Ontario committed to upgrade the plants, Greenpeace energy analyst Shawn Patrick Stensil said.
"This could be a set up for the Ontario government to back out -- with face -- of its 2005 nuclear commitment," Stensil said, noting recent estimates put the costs closer to $15 billion.
"It's also passing the buck if the federal government decides not to lower the price. The McGuinty government can blame the Harper government for killing AECL."
Areva Group of France and U.S.-based Westinghouse Electric Co., who were also in the running to build the reactors, didn't properly address the issue of cost overruns, Smitherman said.
Their bids could be considered in the future if the companies still want to part of process, but Smitherman said AECL is "very well-positioned to come back to us and initiate discussion."
Ontario currently has three operating nuclear plants: Pickering and Darlington east of Toronto, and Bruce on the shores of Lake Huron.
The change will have no impact on Ontario's plans to get rid of coal-fired plants by 2014, nor will it change the energy mix in the province or affect the reliability of electricity, Smitherman said.
Saskatchewan Energy and Resources Minister Bill Boyd said Monday that Ontario's decision to delay its nuclear plans won't derail his province's atomic power review.
Boyd said cost is always an issue, but added that if Saskatchewan pursues nuclear power it would look for a partnership that would not use taxpayer money.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(24)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Erik
0
said
0
Canada has world leading nuclear technology, and it would be a shame to see our tax dollars being spent elsewhere.
Steve the Pundit
0
said
0
Maybe now we can stop with this notion (based not in reality, but in political "optics") that we have other viable alternatives for generating "peak load" power. We don't. Period. Nuclear cannot be ramped up quickly, and solar / wind is unreliable (and cannot be stored with current battery technology). Even Niagara Falls is close to tapped out, hydro-wise.
The only reason the Ontario power grid hasn't collapsed due to the Liberal's incompetence on this file is that the recession (and the layoff of tens of thousands of workers) has reduced electricity requirements. Nothing says "good for the environment" like depriving workers of a paycheque!
So stop all this political "greenwashing" and do what should have been done when you were first elected: install scrubbers on the coal plants. It's proven, it works, it doesn't cost anywhere near as much as a nuke plant, and it can be done quickly. As a bonus, you'll reduce health care costs due to people breathing in unscrubbed emissions.
Come on McGuinty! For once let's see you do what's right, not what's politically expedient.
kate
0
said
0
Glenn in Winnipeg
0
said
0
Keep electricity relatively cheap.
KJ in Kingston Ontario
0
said
0
Scene
0
said
0
Vern AAFU-Oshawa spokesman
0
said
0
Gary Findlay
0
said
0
We're backing ourselves into a bad corner...
0
said
0
It's not as if these reactors can be up and running in a short period. In a few more years we will be desperate for the power with our current plants needing large overhauls. The cost may be high, but the cost of buying power from american coal plants is higher...
Patriot
0
said
0
THE Fatman
0
said
0
Dave from Toronto
0
said
0
Windmill farmer
0
said
0
Ross
0
said
0
The problem is we have to do something to get more electricity.
So far Dalton has done nothing and has no plans.
We need leadership on this and many other problems and the Libs are giving us nothing but consultants and waste on a gigantic scale.
Time for a change.
simon
0
said
0
That puts the AECL out of the equation, I would guess.
kkhon
0
said
0
Erik
0
said
0
This article is about nuclear power generation, not producing medical isotopes
Kkhon
0
said
0
Dave in Whitby
0
said
0
this year . Another Blow to the local Economy in Clarington & Durham Region.
Mike
0
said
0
Alex (Toronto)
0
said
0
There are no "scrubbers" that take carbon dioxide out of coal plant emissions. "Clean" cola technology is only pollution-free; it does nothing to reduce greenhouse gases. Ontario could plant enough trees to offset emissions from coal plants, but this would not be a cheap solution.
The government can step back from the business of generating power and just act as a regulator to ensure that the real costs of greenhouse gas emission, nuclear safety and nuclear incident remediation risk, and other costs are incorporated into the price of each solution. Let the market choose the most genuinely efficient solution. Just don't let power producers offload their environmental costs on the taxpayers, as has been done in the past. It may be cheaper for Ontario to import more power than to produce it locally.
Tono
0
said
0
By the way, whatever happened to Atomic Energy of Canada going public? I'm interested in a few shares!
Wind and Gas Critic
0
said
0
In ontario atleast, we are paying windmills 19 cents per kwh, nuclear/hydro/coal get around 3.5 cents as i write this. How is this cheaper energy? Get informed tree-huggers.
Greg - Oshawa
0
said
0