News Sections
Sarkozy says burqas are 'not welcome' in France
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(32)
The Associated Press
Date: Monday Jun. 22, 2009 6:58 PM ET
PARIS President Nicolas Sarkozy declared Monday that the Islamic burqa is not welcome in France, branding the face-covering, body-length gown as a symbol of subservience that suppresses women's identities and turns them into "prisoners behind a screen."
But there was a mixed message in the tough words: an admission that the country's long-held principle of ethnic assimilation -- which insists that newcomers shed their traditions and adapt to French culture -- is failing because it doesn't give immigrants and their French-born children a fair chance.
In a high-profile speech to legislators in the historic chateau at Versailles, Sarkozy said the head-to-toe Muslim body coverings were in disaccord with French values -- some of the strongest language against burqas from a European leader at a time when some western officials have been seeking to ease tensions with the Muslim world.
"In our country, we cannot accept that women be prisoners behind a screen, cut off from all social life, deprived of all identity," Sarkozy said to extended applause of the lawmakers gathered where French kings once held court.
"The burqa is not a religious sign, it's a sign of subservience, a sign of debasement -- I want to say it solemnly," he said. "It will not be welcome on the territory of the French Republic."
Some Muslim leaders interpret the Qur'an to require that women wear a headscarf, niqab or burqa in the presence of a man who is not their husband or close relative.
France is home to western Europe's largest population of Muslims, estimated at about five million. A small but growing group of French women wear burqas and niqabs, which either cloak the entire body or cover everything but the eyes.
Critics fear the issue of full-body coverings, which only involves a tiny minority of French Muslims, could increase discrimination against all Muslims who display their faith in any way.
Dalil Boubakeur, director of the largest Paris mosque, said Sarkozy's push to keep out the burqa is typical of French culture, but worried that he might inflame tensions with Muslims.
The president wanted to show that "the rules of life in France -- and that you can just bring in unjustified traditions," Boubakeur said.
"But you have to hope -- inshallah (God willing) -- that there won't be any ill-feeling, controversies or incidents in this confrontation between an eastern idea and western life," Boubakeur told the AP in a telephone interview. "Or then eastern Muslims will have to return to the Orient ... completely unable to assimilate and uncomfortable in a western system."
But Sarkozy also said immigrants face economic challenges in France, and the government needs to do more to help them.
"Who doesn't see that our integration model isn't working any more?" Sarkozy said. "Instead of producing equality, it produces inequality. Instead of producing cohesion, it creates resentment."
The unemployment rate for immigrants and their French-born children is higher than the national average. Many children of immigrants complain of discrimination, saying they get passed over for jobs because they have "foreign-sounding" names. Frustration of many children of north African and black immigrants boiled over in France's three-week wave of riots in 2005.
The burqa comments made up only a few lines of Sarkozy's speech, which focused on the global economic crisis and a cabinet shake-up expected to be announced Wednesday. The address was the first by a French president to parliament in 136 years; the last was in 1873 -- before legislators banned the practice to protect the separation of powers and keep the president in check. That ban was scrapped last year.
In France, the terms "burqa" and "niqab" often are used interchangeably. A burqa is a full-body covering worn largely in Afghanistan -- with only a mesh screen over the eyes. A niqab is a full-body veil, often black, with slits for the eyes.
Muslim groups and government officials say it's hard to know how many women wear burqas and niqabs in France -- though estimated to be at least in the hundreds. They are far less prevalent than simpler Muslim head scarves.
A 2004 law banned wearing the Muslim head scarf at public schools, along with Jewish skullcaps and large Christian crosses. That law sparked fierce debate both at home and abroad.
In a visit to Normandy earlier this month, U.S. President Barack Obama addressed France's headscarf ban, saying countries handle such issues with their national sensitivities and histories in mind, before adding: "I will tell you that in the United States our basic attitude is, is that we're not going to tell people what to wear."
The French government has been divided on a burqa ban. Immigration Minister Eric Besson said a ban would only "create tensions," while junior minister for human rights Rama Yade said she was open to a ban if it was aimed at protecting women forced to wear the burqa.
The burqa has come under criticism in some parts of Europe. In 2003, Sweden's National Agency for Education gave schools the right to ban pupils from wearing burqas if it interferes with the teaching or safety regulations.
The Dutch government last year described the burqa and other clothing that covers the face, as "undesirable," but the ruling coalition stopped short of attempting a ban amid concerns of possible religious discrimination. But the government did say it would work toward banning burqas in schools and among public servants, saying that they stand in the way of good communication.
Later Monday, Sarkozy hosted a state dinner with Sheik Hamad Bin Jassem Al Thani of Qatar -- a Persian Gulf state where women often wear niqabs. The emir was joined by one of his wives, Sheika Mozah, whose head was covered in an elegant turban.
User Tools
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(32)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
CC
0
said
0
James
0
said
0
DanKhan
0
said
0
Perhaps some women do not want to show all their "wares" to every man who is out shopping for a girlfriend.
This move should help control riots in France this summer.
Dan K
Halifax
Eddie
0
said
0
Fred Eindhoven
0
said
0
meerkat
0
said
0
"The burqa is not a religious sign, it's a sign of subservience, a sign of debasement"
If only politicians in this country could be so brave as to stand up against oppression, even oppression disguised as "religion". And there's plenty of it...
Gerry Lewy
0
said
0
Andre (why are feminists not saying anything)?
0
said
0
And yet, few people argue against the fact that burquas are one of the most obvious symbols of women's second class citizen's role in Islamic societies. Where Canadian society should fight against burquas and women's oppressed status in these societies, we instead tolerate and even encourage the practice and find it "quaint" and in keeping with the god-like principles of multiculturalism.
Karen, Toronto Ontario
0
said
0
I find this type of activity an insult to women, and puts us right back into the middle ages. It's time for real change. Tolerance has gone too far and there's no reason that everyone has to be so accepting of practices so radically different from their own.
Miramichi Kid
0
said
0
FSN
0
said
0
Although I understand that there are women that are forced to wear a burqa, there ARE however women who CHOOSE to wear a burqa.
Just as women in freedom loving countries are free to wear a bikini, women who choose to wear a burqa should ALSO be free to do so.
It is ignorant to believe that ALL women who wear burqas are being forced to do so. There are MANY who choose to wear a burqa as a sign of respect for themselves as well as religious beliefs.
This could be better addressed through education and self esteem programs so that those who are forced to wear a burqa can feel safe to come forward and identify those who are being the enforcers.
Moiya in Hamilton
0
said
0
Roby-D
0
said
0
Joanna
0
said
0
Dave
0
said
0
Sandy in NS
0
said
0
Oliver
0
said
0
Tintin
0
said
0
Andrew
0
said
0
Of course, we can't expect the gutless Canadian govt to stand up for anything.
jdude
0
said
0
WC
0
said
0
SM from Brampton
0
said
0
Kirsten from Oakville
0
said
0
The Homely One
0
said
0
Vince M
0
said
0
When we allow the burqa in Canada we are supporting a form of slavery.
MuskyBuck
0
said
0
That being said, there are two distinct area's of thought when it comes to addressing the 'burka'.
The first is obviously this is in no doubt an act of religious intolerance.
As the best example of why 'religion' in itself is the biggest evil and threat to mankind, the 'burka' is definately a misogynistic law created by bigoted men who use 'religion' as a control on the masses.
However, with that being said, there are people (women and men) out there who accept their fate within the constraints of a religous backed political territory (hello Albertans) and from this standpoint this law would be a infringement on their individual rights to express their religion. (although I've always believed for that group an 'I'm with stupid' sign would suffice)
So this is a bit of a red herring proposal.
I enjoy fighting against religious oppression and certainly misogynistic law but in some cases it must be left to the individual, otherwise the government becomes as much the problem as these antiquated, neanderthal relic leaders.
Debbie Cote
0
said
0
Anne
0
said
0
mi vu
0
said
0
How about muslim world allowing the construction of non muslim places of worship ( synagogue, church, hindu/budhist/sikh temples ) in a muslim majority sharia ruled countries in proportion to number of mosques in democratic / secular countries( no if or buts, when a mosque goes up in a secular/democratic country a non muslim place of worship goes up in the muslim world).
How about the muslim world denounce the destruction of 2000 yr old Budha statue in Afghanistan , and destruction of non muslim places of worship by muslims everywhere and offer to rebuild these sacred and cultural places. How about it?. Its about time the non muslim world got into victimization bandwagon too. Its been a one way accommodation for muslims living in secular democratic countries, where as non muslims live in fear , persecution and dhimmitude in majority muslim countries where only Islam prevails. Muslims are forcing their way of life on accomodating secular countries city by city. Who remembers now that before Islam Afghanistan , Malle , Indonesia, Malaysia etc had 2-3000 yr old thriving and advanced non Islamic culture? All these countries are totally Islamized now. Non Islamic culture has been systematically destroyed in most muslim countries.
Scott - Edmonton
0
said
0
J.S.
0
said
0
Alex (Toronto)
0
said
0
This has nothing to do with personal modesty or with anything a person wears to cover any part of themselves other than their face. Covering up one's face shows disrespect to anyone else one talks to.
This isn't traditional; this is a sign of new extremism and coerced conformance to orthodoxy. We can defend a person's right to disrespect everyone around them while still acknowledging such behavior for what it is.