CTV News | Iran cracks down on reporters, may conduct recount

Top Stories -   

Iran cracks down on reporters, may conduct recount

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Tom Kennedy reports on the turmoil
CTV News Channel: Kamran Bokhari, Middle East expert, on the protests in Iran
CTV News Channel: Milad Dokhanchi, documentary filmmaker, from Tehran on the protests
CTV News Channel: Nikahang Kowsar, Iranian political cartoonist and journalist, on the growing protest movement
Canada AM: The Globe and Mail's George McLeod with details on the unrest in Tehran
Canada AM: Meir Javedanfar, director, Middle East economic and political analyst

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(45)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Jun. 16 2009 3:29 PM ET

Demonstrations broke out across Tehran Tuesday, each showing support for a different side in the battle over a hotly contested national election that has led to charges of voter fraud.

Thousands of supporters of the Iranian government waved flags and pictures of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who announced a limited recount of contested ballots in last week's election.

Despite predictions of a close race, Ahmadinejad was declared winner in a landslide victory.

At the same time, state-controlled television reported that supporters of reformist Mir Hossein Mousavi congregated in Vanak Square, waving banners with pictures of their candidate and clad in the green colour of his campaign.

While the government barred foreign journalists from covering the rallies, it seemed ready to appease angry demonstrators who say the election was rigged in Ahmadinejad's favour.

Abbas Ali Kadkhodaei, a spokesperson for the country's Guardian Council, said only specific ballot boxes from polling stations where irregularities are alleged to have occurred, would be recounted.

The election result led to some of the worst violence Tehran has seen in a decade.

Seven people were killed in clashes on Monday when crowds were fired on after attempting to storm a compound for volunteer militia connected with the Revolutionary Guard.

"Those who voted for Mr. Mousavi. Those who are creating unrest. Those who break glass, smash windows, and vandalize. Those who threaten people. It is not the right thing to defend these people," said Gholam Ali Haddad Adel, a former parliament speaker and an Ahmadinejad supporter.

George McLeod, a reporter with the Globe and Mail, said the situation in Iran has been tense for Iranians and foreigners alike.

Speaking from Tehran, McLeod said he was arrested by police on the weekend and questioned at the Interior Ministry, then released without charge or explanation.

"Ahmadinejad has made some statements to the effect the foreign media has been stoking protests, so the theory is the authorities have been targeting foreign media," McLeod told CTV's Canada AM.

Some foreign journalists, who were in Iran to cover the election, began leaving the country Tuesday when told by the government that their work visas would not be extended.

The government also placed restrictions on other members of the media, including Iranians working for foreign organizations, who were told they could only work from their offices, conduct telephone interviews and use official sources of information, such as state-controlled television.

The restrictions have made it very difficult for major media organizations to transmit independent photographs or videos of the protests.

It is believed that about 10 Iranian journalists have been arrested since the election.

"And we are very worried about them, we don't know where they have been detained," Jean-Francois Julliard of Reporters Without Borders told AP Television News.

According to Julliard, people who have taken photographs at the rallies with their cellphones have also been detained.

In Washington, U.S. President Barack Obama said the election's aftermath signals that "something has happened in Iran," whereby citizens are increasingly willing to question their government.

"There are people who want to see greater openness, greater debate, greater democracy," Obama said, while shying away from directly saying whether he believed the election was rigged.

While Ahmadinejad's win has been looked upon with suspicion by western nations and Iran's upper-middle class, the president's massive victory may not be the result of electoral fraud, said Iranian-Canadian filmmaker Milad Dokhanchi.

"The result of that election does not sound that surprising to me," he told CTV News Channel from Tehran Tuesday afternoon.

In fact, Ahmadinejad enjoys massive popularity in much of the country, Dokhanchi said, adding that demonstrations are only reportedly occurring in major Iranian centres like Tehran and the southwestern city of Shiraz.

In smaller towns and cities, meanwhile, the election result has had little effect, and Iranians are going on with their everyday lives, said Dokhanchi.

Comments are now closed for this story

Remarkable
said
0 0

And they call this a democracy? The opposition leader has to go into hiding as soon as the election is over in fear of his life from the reigning government and the government itself shuts down his website as well as other things like facebook, youtube etc. so the world can't see what's going on.

The Persian people are wonderful people and they certainly don't deserve this.


Nini
said
0 0

I wonder how they will "recount" the votes, when people were in line waiting to vote since the early morning, and at 11am they were told, that there are no more balllots. The whole election should be repeated!


Ian
said
0 0

I guess you can sum it all up in one word. SHAM.....How can a democratic election now have a recount in the suspected or reported areas of voter irregularities. Every indication had the election being a close contest and when the final tally comes in with our friendly incumbent in front with over 60% of the vote, something smells funny somewhere and it can't be in a few ballot boxes. Let's wait and see how transparent the recount is, however I have a feeling things won't change.


Naramsin
said
0 0

Didn't the good ole USA have the same problem a few years ago? Instead of clerics getting involved, it was the Supreme Court and they "awarded" the presidency to George W. Bush. Same story, different country.


adam
said
0 0

Thank you CTV for covering the on-going events in Iran. Please continue with your good work. My fellow Iranians are very much worried that the western governments would enter a back-door deal with Ahmadinejad and all of a sudden everyone would turn a blind eye on the Iranian people while Ahmadinejad's government and militia are busy cracking down on the protesters and believe me the atrocities that Al-Quaede and other terrorist groups committed were grown and cultivated in dictatorships with very close ties with the west- that close tie does not prevent some extremist from pursuing their ideas. Please continue your coverage of the news and their passage to the free world.



DCR-Toronto
said
0 0

What a farce. This is simply a "recount" to try and stop the protetsts. Tell the people what they want to hear and then do what you want whether the people want it or not, anyways. Kind of reminds me of the Liberals here.


Bill from Whitby
said
0 0

Instead of winning by a landslide he will just win by a bit after the recount.


CC
said
0 0

I hope the Iranian people don't let this charade to continue. Keep up the protests. Keep holding the Ayatollah's feet to the fire. Democracy can only come to those who fight to have it.
The people of Iran are the ones who will spark change...not the government.


THE Fatman
said
0 0

Is this another of those cases where the devil one knows turns out to be better than the one he doesn't, leading me to wonder how many (Iranians) are beginning to think that perhaps things weren't so bad under Mohammad Reza Pahlavi after all? At least way back then there wasn't any rigged elections.......


Nancy Rourke
said
0 0

When Ireland broke out in war my father didn't hit the streets in protest......we left for a reason and forgot about it because we were in a better place......these foreigners should do the same. We use to have a peaceful country now we have a country where whoever wants to do whatever they want and get away with it because it is "politically correct" I say CRAP to that. Go back to where you came from if you want a war not in Canada


Our Iranian Friends - we're hopefull with you
said
0 0

We can't let this get swept away covered up and forgotten - I sure hope if more than 100,00 of us ever took to the streets to protest - in spite of all danger & repercussion that the world would listen to us too.

Many years ago Iran/Persia was a forward thinking & advanced country - wouldn't it be amazing if change could really happen!!


Preston
said
0 0

How is it possible for a non-industrialized nation to count 40 Million ballots and declare a victory -- IN THREE HOURS TIME? Clearly the Ahmedinejad club is LYING to the Iranian people and the world.
It's too bad Obama doesn't have the sense to invade Iran now while the populace is rallied against this regime, I fear the decent people of Iran will be left to twist in the wind.


MW in Thunder Bay
said
0 0

I'm sure a recount will take place just as soon as Ahmadinejad filters out the right kind of ballots to recount.

I certainly hope that this (r)evolution continues. The problem becomes that those who have God on their side usually have little problem justifying killing in His name.

Rather than reading the Koran, Ahmadinejad should read up on Nietzsche and he might discover that: "A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything."

And where is Obama on this? Seems he's absent just like he is from firmly dealing with North Korea. He is showing himself to be a medical miracle. Apparently it is possible to stand upright without the use of a spine.


Paul in Brantford
said
0 0

The toothless United Nations should have been watching the election.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is a Dictator.




Mohsen Zamani Fekri
said
0 0

Supreme leader of Iran, Ali Khamenei, and the incumbent president, Ahmadi nejad, have done a coup d'etat against Iranian people. They might have even changed the physical votes which the guardian council now suggests recounting. The guardian council members are Supreme leader's selections. They are independent in no way. Mousavi is our president and we will not accept this foul play. The reality is that interior ministry who is responsible for election has CREATED the numbers they have published. They are NOT consistent with people's will and the local records each candidate representative has had for each election station. The power war is not only for a four-year period it is about our REPUBLIC status. Supreme leader has really violated our constitution and wants to replace our republic system with a completely Sharia-based government in which people vote is not considered. This is really a coup d'etat which people in the west should understand. It is not a simple reaction, NO, it is a protest to defend our votes, and our republic system. If world closes his eyes to this coup, Iran will be the second Zimbabwe. Ahmadi nejad is the only president one who has kissed Ali khamenei's hand. Even his term in presidency was with a fraud, however, that was not that big as this one and supreme leader had not involved himself directly in election. This time it is different. He publicly before the validation of the election has recognized Ahmadi nejad as the president. This is against our laws in Iran. That is because he has ordered secretly to election council that Ahmadi nejad should be announced the winner of this election under any condition. A real COUP D'ETAT is going on there. Please be cautious.


Joseph in Toronto
said
0 0

Who cares?

It seems that the president is nothing more than a figurehead and "yes man" to the Ayotollahs and Mullahs who hold power anyways.

Besides, what can you expect from a country that holds people hostage in their own embassy for over a year? What can you expect from a country that hangs people on cranes for committing the heinous crime of homosexuality? And what can you expect from a country that (sometimes???) stones women to death for committing the horrible crime of adultry? And what can can you expect from a counrty that persecutes their own citizens who are of the Baha'i faith?







Bill in BC
said
0 0

I wonder how many, when the dust settles, of their own citizens will be killed for opposing these wingnuts. Look at how many have died already, killed by the religious police and the internal security nutjobs.
this is not a civilized country.


CYL
said
0 0

Money/Power-to-rule outweighs honesty. What ever happened to all the true leaders of people.


A Koster - BC
said
0 0

Actually Naramsin, you can think a little closer to home to the May 12 09 election in BC. Angus Reid, a long standing and respected polling outfit, had the NDP and the Liberals neck and neck two days before the election.
The results? were the Liberals winning handily with a majority of 49 seats to NDP 35, 'apparently' the popular vote was unchanged from 2005.. mathematical probabilites of that happening?... the tightly wound were celebrating the win of their local liberal candidates at the results of 20/120 polls being in, again 'apparently' voter turnout was initially pegged at 49%... another unlikelihood considering the advance polls showed an above average turnout.
Even the CTV newscasters couldn't help but express the slightest bit of surprise at the results as they were coming in.
Every way you try to justify this past election, it just doesn't add up. Carole James after the recount abruptly announced that she would be running in 2013.
Sham in Iran, sham in Canada.. only they are fighting the results... good for them.


Gee
said
0 0

Let me guess? Our "leaders" decide this is a sham and we attack and kill tens of thousands to preserve democracy? Anyone want to bet against me? We are not the good guys.


The Man
said
0 0

If the government can cheat once, then they can cheat twice.

Recounting is a waste of time.


glen
said
0 0

the people should just keep the protest going. in spite of the intimidation strength in numbers. dont let this president who will stoop to terror to get his own way. break off diplomatic relations with iran now, recall ambassodor. he has the same character traits as hitler


MHB
said
0 0

I hope that Iranians will settle their disputes peacefully and will be careful not to set their country to fire. The Western leaders, with their chrocodile tears on democracy, will be more than happy to see Iran break into chaos. The worst thing that can happen in any country is to have millions of people on both sides fighting in the streets. I really hope that Iranians will not give their enemies a chance to destroy their country as they did to Iraq!.


Roger Hammer
said
0 0

The ISLAMIC REPUBLIC of Iran is a true theocracy - not the kind some paranoid people claimed of the USA under George W. Bush.


MAL
said
0 0

Sometimes we need to consider the others point of view.... there may be a thousand demonstrators in a country of millions.... everything Iran says may be true... or it may not, but there is no doubt the western journalists on the ground over there have an anti-Arab bias. They have an anti-Israel one too, so I guess it evens out???


Pat - Toronto
said
0 0

What does that mean.. agree to count SOME of the ballots?? and what about those who never got to vote in the first place because they ran out of ballots? This is just a placating move to end the violence.. not to seek a true election result.. DUH! do they think every one is stupid??


jesse from georgetown
said
0 0

what i'm seeing is goverment corruption, Ahmadinejad has taken away from the ballots, just because they were losing!.

i mean if Ahmadinejad stays in power. the baha'is, who currently are being arrested and tried in iran will be in worse state, the baha'is were killed by the dozens in the 80's by raids into baha'i homes, and killed. Ahmadinejad seems to be increasing these raids.

western goverments really need to force Ahmadinejad to play fair. even if he loses the election. maybe this reform leader will be a great thikng for iran.

i hope and wish they will grow and become a more liberal country


Iran is far better off than under US-agent Shah
said
0 0

Mousavi is just another dictator with US media support from Twitter Twits.


Twitter cheats were claiming fraud before election
said
0 0

Mousavi himself plays an important role in causing the social unrest within Iran. How often do you see a candidate declare himself the winner before any votes are counted and then, when faced with defeat, call the entire election process a fraud?


It's the same rigged protests used in Ukraine.
said
0 0

At the front of the crowd, good-looking girl speaking perfect English just happens to have a sign written in English.

She was hired by an advertising agency working for the CIA.


Where's the recount on the last two USA elections?
said
0 0

Supreme Court crony of Dubya's daddy put Dubya in office.


Robert in Calgary
said
0 0

I vote for the removal of Ahmadinejad and the Ayatolah using extreme prejudice, as applied by Persians. Sound good?


Pip
said
0 0

I suspect that, no matter who runs for president in Iran, there will always be trouble, for the simple reason that Religion is at the heart of the matter. Religion and democracy do not mix. Religion and politics do not mix.

Britain was in a similar situation until Henry II uttered his famous - though probably apocryphal - line "will no-one rid me of this meddlesome priest"? Thereafter, religion played an ever-decreasing role in British politics.

So, until Iran decides that a theocracy will only harm its prospects, let's leave them to count - or not count - whatever ballots they like!



Jim in Ottawa
said
0 0

Let's hope that the Iranians are successful in their quest for a peaceful transition to western, democratic ideals and welcome them with open arms to the community of peace-loving, democratic nations.


Red X
said
0 0

Iran should crack down on the reporters especially the ones using america based Twitter...

The best compromise is to do the recounts in disputed polls. Since incumbent Ahmadinejad got more than 50% he will still win given M. H. Mousavi was new to the reform movement which may OR may not be backed by Western interests...


The other Lowell in BC
said
0 0

Interesting, Iran is showing its true colors now. Tries to win favor with the rest of the world by holding an election but has a hidden agenda to keep hard liners in power. Efforts to quash resistance is another sign that democracy doesn't exist and the religious leaders (the true leaders) are using smoke and mirrors to curry favor. I hope the resistance doesn't let up their efforts even though it will be costly for them. Freedom has never been an easy task.


Skeptical
said
0 0

"...will conduct a limited recount"

So, even if the recount is done properly, I'm sure they will carefully select which areas to recount and which ones to remain as is.
That seems fair...



Ian K
said
0 0

My sources in Iran tell me that wounded or injured protesters are being taken to military hospital(s) if they use ambulance services. Once there they are arrested after being treated.




Jackie Barrett
said
0 0

If the recounts still favour Ahmadinejad, perhaps the Western nations should impose sanctions and trade embargoes against Iran for election rigging, human rights abuses, mistreatment towards Iranian youth who make up the majority of the nation's population, having religious fundamentalists like the Ayatollahs taking power not the people, media control, and other human rights restrictions.

Now it sounds like Iran is turning into another China or North Korea where basic human rights are being oppressed and freedom of speech in controlled.

In my opinion, it should be individuals from Iran's main age demographic running the country, not the old fashioned Ayatollahs, Shahs, or state dictatorships.


Layton in Moncton
said
0 0

I forsee one of two things happening here. Either the Council on Foreign Relations will seize upon this opportunity and escalate the situation to a civil war and revolution(they did it in the 1950's when they helped place the Shah in power). Or a massive government crackdown. Either way all eyes are on Tehran and the Iranian people as they decide how to deal with a fraudulent election and a now obviously corrupt regime. I hope they do a better job than the Americans did when Bush stole both of his elections.


From Toronto
said
0 0

Absolutely the recount won't be the solution!!! The election wasn't done properly and recounting the ballots won’t do anything!!!!

I love how the Iranian people are protesting and letting their voices to be heard. The Iranians been shut up for years about all the corruptions that has been happening in their government or even if they had small rallies against the government, they have been punished for it and because of the government’s restrictions no body would hear about them. The events that are happening now are not only for the election, but they are for all the government’s frauds and lies over the past years. This is just an exuse to let their voices heard, which is great!!Iran's government is corrupted and that's why these things happen! These are not mistakes and Iranians know that, that's why they are out on the streets, with all the restrictions and demanding a CHANGE.


JFC
said
0 0

Another huge reason to get off the oil addiction... who wants to pay, even indirectly, their hard earned money at the pump to these clowns who have to even rig elections to stay in power??!



Farhad
said
0 0

It could be an exercise for new limited democracy for an imerging regional power. I think Iran will emerge from this experience stronger and more tolerant.


Mo
said
0 0

The last paragraph is a total lie. There has been major clashes in the Northern cities of Rasht, Gorgan, Babol, in the South in Bandar Abbas, Ahwaz, Shiraz, in the NOrth West in Tabriz, etc. And the polls showed Mousavi with 62% and Ahmadi with 34% of the votes. It's really important where you get your information. If Ahmadi got 62% of the votes where are his supporters? I only see paid militia beating people up. I also got unconfirmed reports that Russia helped the government engineer the coo, not surprising because if Mousavi is the president, relations with the US will improve and Russia may lose influence.


Moose lost. Get over it. Stupid Twits.
said
0 0

Without any evidence, many U.S. politicians and “Iran experts” have dismissed Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s reelection Friday, with 62.6 percent of the vote, as fraud.

They ignore the fact that Ahmadinejad’s 62.6 percent of the vote in this year’s election is essentially the same as the 61.69 percent he received in the final count of the 2005 presidential election, when he trounced former President Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. The shock of the “Iran experts” over Friday’s results is entirely self-generated, based on their preferred assumptions and wishful thinking.




Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz