CTV News | Feds announce major shakeup of nuclear agency

Top Stories -   

Feds announce major shakeup of nuclear agency

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Graham Richardson outlines the cause
Power Play: Lisa Raitt, natural resources minister, explains how the sale will help AECL become more competitive
Power Play: Linda Keen, former president of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, on whether privatization will help
CTV News Channel: BNN's Amanda Lang on the nuclear agency sale and what it has to do with being competitive
CTV News Channel: Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt on overhaul at AECL
CTV News Channel: Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt takes questions on overhaul at AECL
CTV News Channel: Dr. Christopher O'Brien, Ontario Association of Nuclear Medicine, on the reactor
CTV News Channel: BNN's Kim Parlee with market reaction to the nuclear sale

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(49)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Thu. May. 28 2009 6:19 PM ET

The federal government announced Thursday a major shakeup of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.

Ottawa plans to sell AECL's nuclear reactor business to the private sector, in a bid to boost worldwide sales of its CANDU reactors.

The government wants to have the Crown corporation's nuclear reactor operations run by people in the business community, instead of bureaucrats.

Under the restructuring, the agency will be split into two companies: separating the CANDU operations and the troubled National Research Universal reactor at Chalk River, Ont.

The government will also bring in a private sector partner to manage the aging and problem-plagued Chalk River facility, which was shut down May 15 for the third time in less than two years.

Minister of Natural Resources Lisa Raitt said splitting up AECL is necessary because the Crown corporation is currently trying to serve two separate mandates and falling short on both counts.

"In the past number of years, those two sides have not been working well together," she said, adding both sides have been missing out on deals and key projects.

Raitt said the demand for nuclear energy will rise globally in the coming years and Canada hopes to benefit from it.

"The best chance ... to take advantage of this nuclear renaissance is to divide the two of them and seek global participation," Raitt told CTV's Power Play on Thursday.

But since building and servicing reactors is so expensive, Raitt said Canada must bring partners on board.

"The Canada taxpayer just can't carry that load by themselves, in order to compete internationally."

When asked if the shakeup is part of an asset sale to help balance Ottawa's $50-billion budget shortfall, Raitt said "this is purely about bolstering the industry and getting it ready for future prosperity."

The restructuring comes after a nearly two-year review and could also bring billions of dollars into government coffers.

According to a nuclear medicine expert, Ottawa's plan is a positive step.

Dr. Christopher O'Brien from the Ontario Association of Nuclear Medicine said a shakeup at AECL should have occurred more than a year ago when the facility showed repeated signs of trouble.

O'Brien said it's "frustrating" that a government plan to rectify Chalk River's problems has taken nearly two years to surface, but he added the new plan is a step in the right direction.

"Anything we can do to maintain that infrastructure and the narrow lines of (isotope) supply ... is a good thing," he told CTV News Channel on Thursday.

O'Brien said government bureaucrats aren't "experts in the management of nuclear reactors" and that Canada's plan to privatize the business end of manufacturing medical isotopes has "precedent" in other countries.

For example, O'Brien pointed to medical isotope production at Tennessee's Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is a public facility managed by the private sector.

He stressed that as long as the supply of medical isotopes is secure, it's "irrelevant" who runs the program.

The announcement comes two weeks after the Ontario government tapped AECL as the lead bidder to build two new nuclear reactors in the province.

The key to AECL's future hangs on winning that contract, which is worth $28 billion.

Ottawa also needs to do something about the faulty 50-year-old reactor at Chalk River, which provides at least a third of the world's medical isotopes used in imaging tests.

A heavy water leak shut down the reactor two weeks ago, and the agency says Chalk River will be out of commission for at least three months.

Senior officials have told CTV News that the reactor is unfixable.

Linda Keen, the former president of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, said it isn't yet clear if Ottawa wants to sell-off the entire corporation or simply attract investors.

Keen, who was fired in 2008 as the head of Canada's nuclear safety watchdog for her handling of the Chalk River shutdown, added that the real question is whether it's too late for the country's nuclear industry to catch up with international competitors like General Electric.

"The market has gone so fast, and one of the questions that's going to be in everybody's mind is, 'what's left to grab?'"

With files from Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Dunny from Manotick
said

I hope they close any imminent business including the deal with India first to increase the benefit to the taxpayers.


Russel
said

"Ottawa wants to replace the fifty-year-old reactor at Chalk River, Ont."

Why now??? Why did back in the mid-late nineties when AECL wanted to build the CNF (Canadian Neutron Facility)did Ottawa not approve it. We would not have an isotope problem now had the government at the time (hmmm wonder who that was) approved the build.


peggy
said

I do not think it is a good idea. While nuclear is good in that it provides isotopes for imaging tests, it can also be bad because very powerful weapons can be built and used in war. Anything to do with nuclear needs to be closely regulated and monitored, and I feel that things won't be as good if private industry gets into the picture.


Mel from Calgary
said

The government needs to then put this into an investment fund. Selling valuable assets are not the right of the government to spend now but future generations must also benefit from this property.

The City of Edmonton did this when they sold their phone company and this investment grows and provides a substatial dividend to the city every year.

If you think of the billions of dollars the government has received over the years selling assets (Air Canada, Petro Canada, office buildings)we would have a fund to suplement taxes well into the future.




Ken p.
said

Good move, it will enable some long term planning and strategies.


Heavy Water.
said

Selling Chalk River will not absolve the government of the responsibility for Public Safety.
Nice try Tories........
Try something else.....


Monty Burns going to be richer!
said

My concern is selling our nuclear plant to private sector mean Monty Burns will be in control!!!!.....

He is greedy...

On serious note is that if private take control of our power plants and electricity bill may goes up...

Enron scandal is best example.....

Calforina suffer skyrocket electricity bills and rolling blackouts....

This is a fine example why government should remains in control of this kind of things....

Tories is well known for selling everything to private sectors......

If something is wrong with current system - DEAL WITH IT AND FIX IT.... Don't sell it....


Jimmy from Toronto
said

This is more of the Harper government selling off this country's valuable assets at bargain basement prices to their friends. Why not fund the AECL properly instead of giving it away in the middle of a recession?

Mike Harris & the 407 all over again... Sell off a valuable asset to make the books look a little better before the next election


Carl
said

This has to stop.

Seriously? Our national nuclear program becoming privatized?

Who the heck do these people think they are. They are selling off our future and our pride.

Our railways, our power plants, our highways, mines, oil fields, fishing zones, water rights, power rights etc etc. Just sell the whole damn country why don't you.

These are future investments that have been promised to us through our taxes for generations. The government has no right to liquidate all our assets. A tiny minority victory is no mandate to completely re-shape our country and our ethics.

This BS has to stop. Make some noise people. Wake up and smell the burning.


ric
said

oh great... so now the americans can buy it, lay everyone off and shut it down for good. Good plan ;)


Aliza
said

Will the monies raised from the sale be used to refurbish Chalk River and/or build additional nuclear imaging or power generation facilities? If so, then perhaps a sale is appropriate. If not, then the sale is a bad idea; as someone else commented, it should only be sold if it will be appropriately reinvested, not spent as part of current expenditures


JMJ
said

.....The sale could also bring billions of dollars into government coffers...

And how many billions will it cost taxpayers in the future to clean up and maintain Chalk River in the future?

Time to get this albatross off taxpayer backs and sell and/or close all of it.


Chad
said

I can not beleive this is happening, This is wrong. When you put private people who only concern is makeing a buck, things get neglected ( prime example CN rail as soon as private, trains derailed now it is a yearly thing) If i where by the chalk river i would move as soon as a private firm moved in. Is is a desaster in the waiting. GIVE YOU HEAD A SHAKE. the only thing good in this deal is some one is getting rich and it not the tax payer........


Dave Taylor
said

Who would want to want to buy an economic disaster? Good luck feds...Canadians are stuck with a legacy of nuclear waste which will include the clean up all of the sites from Chalk River to Pinawa.


Robert Johnston Calgary
said

AECL has been a hoax and in complete disarray for decades; the financial realities of it are always deep red in the "total loss" column, lies and gross deception saturate all their marketing, their safety and production records are horrible and now the irresponsible degenerates will stick the taxpayers with the nightmare costs of decommissioning the plants and taking care of the nuclear wastes for the next 1000 generations, a problem that no country on Earth has an acceptable solution for and CAN'T. The whole idea of nuclear energy is nothing but a Ponzi scheme. SAY NO TO NUCLEAR at every possible chance!


Frank Buchan (Vauxhall, Alberta by way of Ontario)
said

Right, private sector bad; government good...except that isn't the case here. Governments are good at regulation, not management (of anything).

As for why the reactor wasn't fixed in the 90s, as much as I detest the LPC, the same would have happened no matter who was in charge. Modern governments have no ability to plan.


Robert Johnston
said

AECL has no profitable parts. It has always relied on huge federal subsidies to take care of the major failings and outragious cost over-runs AECL has consistently delivered for decades. Energy Probe reported in 2006 that AECL was directly responsible for 12% of Canada's national debt. And they think it might sell? Only if the deal is secretly and heavily corrupt! Hilarious!


gp
said

we all saw this one coming...


Larry
said

Another BAD mistake by this Government.


Mark Johnson
said

Many people have jumped to conclusions on this. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the article said they are selling a stake (read percentage) of the business, not the whole thing.

Same goes with the Chalk River plant. They aren't selling the whole plant, just a stake so they can get it looked after properly.


Alberta Redneck
said

Come on folks, give your collective heads a shake and get the details before you go off half cocked. The current shutdown is only the latest straw that broke the camels back. Fact 1: AECL is NOT the regulator there is a separate organization that does that. Fact 2: AECL as a crown corporation tried for years to get Maple One and Maple Two off the ground and has recently canned both projects. Fact 3: The Ontario Electrical system is in the market for two new reactors at an estimated cost of $28. AECL as a crown corporatin cannot get their acts together to compete for that business and if it goes to the Americans or somebody else there are seveal tens of thousands of jobs that the laid off auto workers will not be getting. And, finally, Fact 4: As bad as the old reactor is, they have a huge business in Isotopes to say nothing of power and a decent management team will pay a pretty penny, not for what the old hulk is worth, but for the business opportunity it provides. They will get it open, run it efficiently while they plan for the immediate replacement of the reactor using whatever pieces out of the Maples they can. And, of course, all this will happen under the watchful eye of a reenergized Atomic Energy Control Board. My only complaint is that they didn't do this 3 years ago, but then I forget how many things like this that were on their plate back in 2006. Go Conservatives. Good move.

PS This might be the change needed to get a reactor up in the tar sands area to provide the huge amount of power needed.


SJ
said

Sell sell sell. Thats all this moronic government knows how to do.

The Canadian government isn't going to own a SINGLE asset after these fools are done.

They are pathetic. I don't think I would be out of line in blaming about 90% of you people on this board for allowing them to do all of this either... Thanks.


Dave
said

It's a good idea. The government shouldn't be running private sector businesses. Let's make sure it remains Canadian controlled though.


Hon Owen Shears
said

Election time!


Proud Canuck
said

Not sure why people are wining about the govt selling these kinds of things. The govt has never succeeded in running businesses, the private sector is where these things should be, it increases competition which is when technology, creativity and even costs go down. That's the whole premise of capitalism. Why does everyone want the govt controlling everything. Let's have less govt in our lives and we'll all be better for it.


Matt
said

About time.
I never understood why the government needed to run a nuclear reactor business.

They can (and should) create and enforce safety regulations. But they shouldn't be trying to sell products, it's a horrible conflict of interest.

Plus now Canadians who oppose nuclear will have the option of NOT owning a company which is trying to sell nuclear reactors.


Doug BC
said

Obviously "the devil will be in the details". I see no reason to eithr jump for joy or wring our hands with glee until we have aa lot more information than we have now.
That said, I think AECL has seriously failed Canadian taxpayers. It is time,either to show us something we can use,or give up the ghost. Too many dollars have been spent to allow AECL to go on and on UNLESS they have,or are reasonably close to building power plants that work.
I'm no expert/I concede that with no problem. But right now, Chalk River seems to be a declining asset, and the MAPLE project looks to be stuck in neutral.We need nuclear power.If not right now,in the near future. Given how long ot takes to design and build these projects,it seems ridiculous to keep pouring tax dollars into something that may never work. Especially in a world market that doesn't seem to want to buy our technology, and has lots of reliable,and cheaper reactors available.
I want AECL to succeed. Be sure of that.But they have to show us some progress for the money they've spent.
I would hope that they only sell "a stake" in AECL,as opposed to selling it completely.A businees that relies on making a profit is much more motivated to produce something of value than is an institution hat jus keeps going back to government for more money.
Politics aside, AECL needs to be fixed. Now we can only hope they do a decent job of fixing it. If they do, there will likely be jobs and profits somewhere down the line. Something I don't see from AECL as it is now.


Jeff
said

Remember the fate of the Avro Arrow? Seems to me that we did not learn a thing from that disaster.


Patricia
said

Privatization is not always the best idea. In fact, it can cause more problems. This is because the private company is always looking for profits ahead of everything else including, in this case, safety.


Matt
said

Our electricity prices might rise? Some people need to get a bit more informed.

AECL makes the reactors, not electricity.

Assuming you live in Ontario the reason your electricity is so cheap is the government subsidizes it, and we use cheap sources of energy like Coal.
Don't worry though, Dalton will conveniently privatize the coal plants, stop the subsidies and slap them with punative carbon taxes, just so you can blame greedy corporations for your new higher electricity bills.


NJG
said

Good move by the Harper government. Energy production is done much better (more efficient/profitable) in the private sector.

Anyone against this is probably a communist who thinks the government should control and own everything


Trent
said

Russel why don't you ask the liberal goverment why they did not build the reactors? and now the goverment realizes it should have been done...So don't blame the new goverment for an old goverment problum...


Chris Johnson
said

DONT SELL! Unless it is to a canadian owned firm! Keep our proud nuclear heritage canadian and dont sell it out to another country, like the HBC! So many canaidian companies get sold to foreign owners, petro canada, molsons, and I beleive Labatts too, it is time we start keeping our pride inside canada and not let other owners start "changing our designs!"


Matt
said

Chris Johnson,

If the Canadian owners don't want it, and other Canadians aren't willing to buy it what should we do?

Lets take the example of HBC.
The current owners don't want it, do they sell it as a functioning store to people who want to keep it running, thereby preserving the store, staff and jobs. Or do they shut it down and liquidate the company. Losing more money for the owners while the staff lose their jobs.

Does it really matter the nationality of the owners?
Myself I do buy stock in many global companies, I have stock in US, European and Asian companies. Whats wrong with trading a bit of CIBC for a bit of Toyota, a bit of Molson for Coors, or RIM for Google?


Another dumb CONS decision!
said

Imagine the scenario. Currently, the public sector is solely reponsible for the Atomic Energy in Canada. They put people's welfare and safety very high on their list of priority because no one wants to be accused of being negligent with regards to public safety. Once it is sold and a corporation manages it with a legal rulebook from the Government, then risks will be taken based on loopholes or lack of clarity of the agreements signed. See from the point where it is sold, your safety will be only a byproduct of the corporation's priority. Under the public sector ownership, you are way safer.....before what you wish for....it may all kill us one day!


Steve G
said

Well, if privatization of highway maintenance here in Ontario is any indication, the only thing that will improve is the bottom line of the company winning the bid-certainly not the end product.


Russel
said

Trent, that is what I was getting at. It was the liberals who wouldn't give them the money back then and kept cutting there budget.


Using recession as excuse to sell off assets.
said

Standard policy for Conservatives.

Conservatives don't want to govern; they want to destroy the possibility of government operating democratically.






Pete, Burlington
said

This is a great move by the Gov't and shows real leadership by Harper and his team. It will be good for AECL and will lead to lots of new business in a major growth industry. The real good news is that AECL likes to have its suppliers local to it, so it it really good for Canada.

It will also return a large windfall to the government which will help with the current $50Bn problem.

I am sure Iggy and Layton will find something negative to moan about.


JIM/ONTARIO
said

To sell any or part of Chalk River would be a "NATIONAL DISGRACE"!Much like the calimity over the"AVRO ARROW"which was dismantled by another Conservative government led by John Diefenbaker,Canadians have questioned this decision fifty years!People must remeber who Harper's key cabinet is comprised of?Two of his key cabinet ministers sat on the Ontario cabinet when the 407 was sold at a "FIRESALE PRICE"to a spanish consortium,these two key cabinet ministers left in their wake a large defecit in Ontario when they departed!Which they both will deny!So why would anyone beleive what they have to say about Chalk Rver being sold off>


Ron in the West
said

Public trust and management isn't working here so time for another approach. Well done Conservatives. Of course, don't expect the opposition parties or their lackies to support you...they don't support anything that the government wants to do.


johnny
said

I hope the new owners will sell only to governments that promote the use of Thorium as a power source instead of Uranium. Candu's can run on Thorium. Non prolific, last up to three times longer in the reactor and burns up old plutonium and waste nuclear fuel


Lisolio
said

Long term planning and policy development are what "bureaucrats" (yes, that nasty word to some people) do very well. They are professionals. This government is just selling off one of our assets... and is going to let the private sector be involved with this sensitive area -- it's absurd and just plain wrong and dangerous.


gail welburn
said

More nuclear power plants should have been built in the 1980's when it was first proposed. Shame on our lazy government, just like pollution and global warming, they'll drag their asses and now look at our future.


Grade eleven nerd
said

Honestly this is a big mistake. The tories are trying to make themselves look better, but actualy are making themselves look worse, except to those that are blind !!!! Please. Just hire a some more people to run the program not more politicians. The governemnet wastes enough money as it, why not take some of that wasted money and hire people to run it so they can make money. People... cmmmon sense...


Nancy: Canada led World in Co-ordination
said

Glad we have some competent people in place now instead of politcal cromnies. The 5 reactors in the world now try to co-oridinate shuts downs and Canada led the world in this program so people in countries you never heard of benefit for Canada again.


Bruce
said

It's a good move and long overdue.

Next up, sell the CBC or it's assets, wind it up.

That extra billion a year could build four armed Polar 8 icebreakers in the first five years for Arctic sovereignty.


Ray in Sask
said

Privatization here we come, first this, next will be health care. Don't be surprised that for those who are not rich will be stuck with mediocre service.


Samual
said

This is a national disgrace, this government is destroying Canada.
I hope there is an election soon.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz