News Sections
Feds announce major shakeup of nuclear agency
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(49)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. May. 28 2009 6:19 PM ET
The federal government announced Thursday a major shakeup of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.
Ottawa plans to sell AECL's nuclear reactor business to the private sector, in a bid to boost worldwide sales of its CANDU reactors.
The government wants to have the Crown corporation's nuclear reactor operations run by people in the business community, instead of bureaucrats.
Under the restructuring, the agency will be split into two companies: separating the CANDU operations and the troubled National Research Universal reactor at Chalk River, Ont.
The government will also bring in a private sector partner to manage the aging and problem-plagued Chalk River facility, which was shut down May 15 for the third time in less than two years.
Minister of Natural Resources Lisa Raitt said splitting up AECL is necessary because the Crown corporation is currently trying to serve two separate mandates and falling short on both counts.
"In the past number of years, those two sides have not been working well together," she said, adding both sides have been missing out on deals and key projects.
Raitt said the demand for nuclear energy will rise globally in the coming years and Canada hopes to benefit from it.
"The best chance ... to take advantage of this nuclear renaissance is to divide the two of them and seek global participation," Raitt told CTV's Power Play on Thursday.
But since building and servicing reactors is so expensive, Raitt said Canada must bring partners on board.
"The Canada taxpayer just can't carry that load by themselves, in order to compete internationally."
When asked if the shakeup is part of an asset sale to help balance Ottawa's $50-billion budget shortfall, Raitt said "this is purely about bolstering the industry and getting it ready for future prosperity."
The restructuring comes after a nearly two-year review and could also bring billions of dollars into government coffers.
According to a nuclear medicine expert, Ottawa's plan is a positive step.
Dr. Christopher O'Brien from the Ontario Association of Nuclear Medicine said a shakeup at AECL should have occurred more than a year ago when the facility showed repeated signs of trouble.
O'Brien said it's "frustrating" that a government plan to rectify Chalk River's problems has taken nearly two years to surface, but he added the new plan is a step in the right direction.
"Anything we can do to maintain that infrastructure and the narrow lines of (isotope) supply ... is a good thing," he told CTV News Channel on Thursday.
O'Brien said government bureaucrats aren't "experts in the management of nuclear reactors" and that Canada's plan to privatize the business end of manufacturing medical isotopes has "precedent" in other countries.
For example, O'Brien pointed to medical isotope production at Tennessee's Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is a public facility managed by the private sector.
He stressed that as long as the supply of medical isotopes is secure, it's "irrelevant" who runs the program.
The announcement comes two weeks after the Ontario government tapped AECL as the lead bidder to build two new nuclear reactors in the province.
The key to AECL's future hangs on winning that contract, which is worth $28 billion.
Ottawa also needs to do something about the faulty 50-year-old reactor at Chalk River, which provides at least a third of the world's medical isotopes used in imaging tests.
A heavy water leak shut down the reactor two weeks ago, and the agency says Chalk River will be out of commission for at least three months.
Senior officials have told CTV News that the reactor is unfixable.
Linda Keen, the former president of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission, said it isn't yet clear if Ottawa wants to sell-off the entire corporation or simply attract investors.
Keen, who was fired in 2008 as the head of Canada's nuclear safety watchdog for her handling of the Chalk River shutdown, added that the real question is whether it's too late for the country's nuclear industry to catch up with international competitors like General Electric.
"The market has gone so fast, and one of the questions that's going to be in everybody's mind is, 'what's left to grab?'"
With files from Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(49)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Dunny from Manotick
said
Russel
said
Why now??? Why did back in the mid-late nineties when AECL wanted to build the CNF (Canadian Neutron Facility)did Ottawa not approve it. We would not have an isotope problem now had the government at the time (hmmm wonder who that was) approved the build.
peggy
said
Mel from Calgary
said
The City of Edmonton did this when they sold their phone company and this investment grows and provides a substatial dividend to the city every year.
If you think of the billions of dollars the government has received over the years selling assets (Air Canada, Petro Canada, office buildings)we would have a fund to suplement taxes well into the future.
Ken p.
said
Heavy Water.
said
Nice try Tories........
Try something else.....
Monty Burns going to be richer!
said
He is greedy...
On serious note is that if private take control of our power plants and electricity bill may goes up...
Enron scandal is best example.....
Calforina suffer skyrocket electricity bills and rolling blackouts....
This is a fine example why government should remains in control of this kind of things....
Tories is well known for selling everything to private sectors......
If something is wrong with current system - DEAL WITH IT AND FIX IT.... Don't sell it....
Jimmy from Toronto
said
Mike Harris & the 407 all over again... Sell off a valuable asset to make the books look a little better before the next election
Carl
said
Seriously? Our national nuclear program becoming privatized?
Who the heck do these people think they are. They are selling off our future and our pride.
Our railways, our power plants, our highways, mines, oil fields, fishing zones, water rights, power rights etc etc. Just sell the whole damn country why don't you.
These are future investments that have been promised to us through our taxes for generations. The government has no right to liquidate all our assets. A tiny minority victory is no mandate to completely re-shape our country and our ethics.
This BS has to stop. Make some noise people. Wake up and smell the burning.
ric
said
Aliza
said
JMJ
said
And how many billions will it cost taxpayers in the future to clean up and maintain Chalk River in the future?
Time to get this albatross off taxpayer backs and sell and/or close all of it.
Chad
said
Dave Taylor
said
Robert Johnston Calgary
said
Frank Buchan (Vauxhall, Alberta by way of Ontario)
said
As for why the reactor wasn't fixed in the 90s, as much as I detest the LPC, the same would have happened no matter who was in charge. Modern governments have no ability to plan.
Robert Johnston
said
gp
said
Larry
said
Mark Johnson
said
Same goes with the Chalk River plant. They aren't selling the whole plant, just a stake so they can get it looked after properly.
Alberta Redneck
said
PS This might be the change needed to get a reactor up in the tar sands area to provide the huge amount of power needed.
SJ
said
The Canadian government isn't going to own a SINGLE asset after these fools are done.
They are pathetic. I don't think I would be out of line in blaming about 90% of you people on this board for allowing them to do all of this either... Thanks.
Dave
said
Hon Owen Shears
said
Proud Canuck
said
Matt
said
I never understood why the government needed to run a nuclear reactor business.
They can (and should) create and enforce safety regulations. But they shouldn't be trying to sell products, it's a horrible conflict of interest.
Plus now Canadians who oppose nuclear will have the option of NOT owning a company which is trying to sell nuclear reactors.
Doug BC
said
That said, I think AECL has seriously failed Canadian taxpayers. It is time,either to show us something we can use,or give up the ghost. Too many dollars have been spent to allow AECL to go on and on UNLESS they have,or are reasonably close to building power plants that work.
I'm no expert/I concede that with no problem. But right now, Chalk River seems to be a declining asset, and the MAPLE project looks to be stuck in neutral.We need nuclear power.If not right now,in the near future. Given how long ot takes to design and build these projects,it seems ridiculous to keep pouring tax dollars into something that may never work. Especially in a world market that doesn't seem to want to buy our technology, and has lots of reliable,and cheaper reactors available.
I want AECL to succeed. Be sure of that.But they have to show us some progress for the money they've spent.
I would hope that they only sell "a stake" in AECL,as opposed to selling it completely.A businees that relies on making a profit is much more motivated to produce something of value than is an institution hat jus keeps going back to government for more money.
Politics aside, AECL needs to be fixed. Now we can only hope they do a decent job of fixing it. If they do, there will likely be jobs and profits somewhere down the line. Something I don't see from AECL as it is now.
Jeff
said
Patricia
said
Matt
said
AECL makes the reactors, not electricity.
Assuming you live in Ontario the reason your electricity is so cheap is the government subsidizes it, and we use cheap sources of energy like Coal.
Don't worry though, Dalton will conveniently privatize the coal plants, stop the subsidies and slap them with punative carbon taxes, just so you can blame greedy corporations for your new higher electricity bills.
NJG
said
Anyone against this is probably a communist who thinks the government should control and own everything
Trent
said
Chris Johnson
said
Matt
said
If the Canadian owners don't want it, and other Canadians aren't willing to buy it what should we do?
Lets take the example of HBC.
The current owners don't want it, do they sell it as a functioning store to people who want to keep it running, thereby preserving the store, staff and jobs. Or do they shut it down and liquidate the company. Losing more money for the owners while the staff lose their jobs.
Does it really matter the nationality of the owners?
Myself I do buy stock in many global companies, I have stock in US, European and Asian companies. Whats wrong with trading a bit of CIBC for a bit of Toyota, a bit of Molson for Coors, or RIM for Google?
Another dumb CONS decision!
said
Steve G
said
Russel
said
Using recession as excuse to sell off assets.
said
Conservatives don't want to govern; they want to destroy the possibility of government operating democratically.
Pete, Burlington
said
It will also return a large windfall to the government which will help with the current $50Bn problem.
I am sure Iggy and Layton will find something negative to moan about.
JIM/ONTARIO
said
Ron in the West
said
johnny
said
Lisolio
said
gail welburn
said
Grade eleven nerd
said
Nancy: Canada led World in Co-ordination
said
Bruce
said
Next up, sell the CBC or it's assets, wind it up.
That extra billion a year could build four armed Polar 8 icebreakers in the first five years for Arctic sovereignty.
Ray in Sask
said
Samual
said
I hope there is an election soon.