News Sections
Napolitano says tougher border good for Canada
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(38)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. May. 27 2009 10:54 PM ET
U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says there are legitimate security concerns along the Canadian border that require tough new measures, and Canadians should realize that both sides will benefit.
But she would not comment on specific groups or individuals who may pose a concern, or whether suspected terrorists have been apprehended along the border without the public's knowledge.
"I think it is fair to say, and I think Canadian law enforcement would say, that there are individuals in Canada whose information is being shared with the United States and vice versa," Napolitano told CTV's Power Play on Wednesday.
During the interview, she repeatedly said that Canadians and U.S. citizens have a shared interest in border security.
"We know, for example, that we have some terrorist groups in the United States, and Canadians have an interest in being protected there, and likewise," she said at one point. "So we need to be working together to make sure we're sharing information."
She also touched on differences between immigration in Canada and the U.S., but would not say whether she felt those differences exposed a risk to the U.S.
"I don't want to say it that way in part because I have discovered Canada is very sensitive to that kind of implication," she said.
At an earlier press conference in Ottawa with Public Safety Minister Peter Van Loan, the two officials announced they had signed a number of new joint trade and security initiatives.
One of the programs is a joint assessment of threats to border security, while another would allow emergency vehicles, workers and equipment to cross the border more quickly in the event of an emergency.
The goal of both nations, Van Loan and Napolitano said, is to improve security and trade simultaneously -- saying one doesn't have to happen at the expense of the other.
But Napolitano, who cut her teeth as a politician in Arizona where problems along the Mexico-U.S. border is always a major issue, has come under criticism for seeming to focus on security over trade.
On March 25, she suggested the Mexican and Canadian borders should be treated the same.
Speaking on Power Play, Napolitano said there were obvious differences between the two borders, but U.S. law does not distinguish between the two.
"My job is to implement the law," she said. "But the techniques we use are going to be very different because the countries are very different and the challenges of the borders are very different."
But she added that contraband does enter the U.S. from Canada, and there is also illegal immigration -- although "the numbers are not the same as "Mexico" -- going both ways.
She also said she was taken aback by continuing criticism from Canadians after an embarrassing "misstatement," when she suggested some of the Sept. 11 terrorists entered the U.S. from Canada.
"In the United States, I've misspoken from time to time. I've been in elected office -- you immediately correct it, you apologize and move on," she said.
"What I regret is that Canada can't seem to get beyond one misstatement from what I'm trying to suggest. And what I am suggesting is that we share security concerns, just as we share trade concerns, and share all kinds of concerns. It behooves us both -- both nations -- to work together. We will, in the end, be stronger together."
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(38)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Mark Erwin
0
said
0
This woman is a lightweight.
Steve
0
said
0
MuskyBuck
0
said
0
We don't need you or your culture of fear here.
Sean in Waterloo
0
said
0
She out right blamed Canada for 9/11. Americans are always blaming everyone else for their problems. Maybe they should focus more on themselves.
Bill
0
said
0
Mary
0
said
0
Canada has spent billions of dollars on border security because they were pushed to by the U.S. I am not saying U.S. security should not have been made stronger after 9/11. It should but to what extent? The border between Canada and the U.S. was not why 9/11 happened. And now we Canadians and Americans all need passports. How will that solve anything when all the 9/11 terrorists who piloted the planes ib 9/11 were all legally entitled to live in the U.S. Napolitano says we Canadians should get over her earlier comments, well maybe the comments lingered on because she never apologized for her wrong comments earlier.
That's another deflection to get attention off her for her gaffes. She has a lot to learn about tact and diplomacy.
Geffen
0
said
0
Good for Canada, cause it means we can keep and spend more of our dollars in our own backyard.
Napolitano's bosses are starting to lose it.
Zircon
0
said
0
It amazes me that people can attain positions of power/responsibility such as hers and have such a shallow or non-existent grasp of logic.
meerkat
0
said
0
We are already painfully aware in Canada that intelligence is not a prerequisite to an elected position in the United States. Why should it be a prerequisite to an appointed position in the president's cabinet? Maybe a geography lesson would be a good place to start.
And finally, just one question to Mrs Napolitano..
Why do so many different cultures and countries have such a hate on for your country that they are constantly trying to infiltrate your borders? If you can come up with the answer to that, maybe you can come up with the answer to your border concerns.
John
0
said
0
Sheri
0
said
0
Gordon Phillips
0
said
0
Stephen Strepsi Montreal
0
said
0
Linda
0
said
0
How quickly she has forgotten the many, many Canadians that were there digging through the rubble shoulder to shoulder with our American neighbours and we grieved with them as well.
Chris
0
said
0
Homeland security will forever be scrutinized as it does impose a number things on citizens of the US and of all those entering the states....as for Canada we have to tug along and do as the states do...and here we are not. We can work together but must remain separate as much as possible. I agree that Nap should take her paranoia elsewhere. Where did the Pres find her anyways?
Robert Brise
0
said
0
uttered by people of importance. We also can tell the difference between deliberate misinformation that is used to try and bolster certain politicians popularity.
Katie
0
said
0
MW in Thunder Bay
0
said
0
But just like governments who favor gun control among law abiding citizens, it's simply easier for Mrs. Napolitano to hassle her neighbours to the north who have not done anything wrong and pose no security threat.
Peter1951
0
said
0
The Terrorists are laughing, they have accomplished exactly what they set out to do, and that is to keep the American looking over their shoulders 24/7. But for the USA to give Canada the cold shoulder is the wrong message to send out to the world. This USA Canada border has been a model to the rest of the world how two peaceful and free countries can get along and the Americans are so paranoid they are destroying the great relationship we have always had. And Canada being the USA largest trading partner this is going to only hurt this world economic situation even more.
Goldens
0
said
0
JW
Btwn NS
Joel Bain
0
said
0
DV88
0
said
0
Doug BC
0
said
0
That said,it's time to move on.She screwed up by commenting on the 9/11 terrorists.Get over it.
Thinking Canadians know all to well how weak our immigration system is.Add to that the joke we call a justice system,and the fact that Canadians would rather have free day care than a well equipped military that can handle most of our own security issues,and it's easy to understand why the USA has reservations about it's northern cousins.
If "Steve" wants us to have new trading partners for our exports,I hope he supports lower taxes.If that doesn't happen,few of our businesses will be able to compete,or sell to any but the wealthiest nations on the planet.I actually agree with "Steve".But Canadians seem unwilling to make the sacrifices needed to get us from where we are now,to where we want to be in the future.Until we get our own house in order,we NEED the USA market a lot more than they need ours.
You want real sovereignty for your children? To do that we need lower taxes,a lot less debt,fewer people living on "free" handouts by government,and a military that is well enough equipped to work productively with our NATO partners.
As long as we don't take security seriously,the USA will continue to tighten up the border.They have no choice.This is one of the unintended consequences of Trudeau's neglect of our military.
I don"t like this woman.But we have orchestrated this mess ourselves by being to cheap to properly fund our share of North America's defense needs.
Brian In... well... they already know over there.
0
said
0
Colline
0
said
0
Mike from Toronto
0
said
0
Kevin
0
said
0
Robert Buchanan
0
said
0
I just know that my US neighbours in Arizona (I'm a sometime snowbird) won't be heading to Canada anytime soon to visit their daughter who married a Canadian and moved to Ontario.
It's almost going to be a spectator sport in my neck of the woods on Monday. There are 2 "rural" border crossings nearby, and the US side just got the full construction treament of concrete and steel barriers designed to keep the "heathens" out.
I just wonder what the local US folk are going to do when they cross the border into Canada to enjoy their favoured exchange rate and then can't get back home without a passport.
Brian
0
said
0
Tim ontario
0
said
0
Bay
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
"She also touched on differences between immigration in Canada and the U.S., but would not say whether she felt those differences exposed a risk to the U.S.
'I don't want to say it that way in part because I have discovered Canada is very sensitive to that kind of implication,' she said."
________________
Where did you get that impression? (From this forum?)
Murray W.
0
said
0
George Poole in Lunenburg
0
said
0
Dennis L. Krahn
0
said
0
Only idiots would say that here are no problems at the 49th parallel.
Given the immigration policies of both the US and Canada there is a good chance that undesireables abound in both countries.
We live close to the Americans, let us work together and get busy fixing the problems.
Denny in Sask
0
said
0
Americans and Canadians deserve better than this blundering woman.
Kerry
0
said
0
The US has the right to protect its borders the way it sees fit, just as we do.
stevo
0
said
0