Canada -
News Sections
Isotope shortage could lead to medical test delays
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(53)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. May. 20 2009 8:58 AM ET
The shutdown of Ontario's Chalk River nuclear reactor could have "dire" implications if it overlaps with the scheduled shutdown of a European reactor that also produces the vital medical isotopes, according to one expert.
The problem-plagued Ontario reactor has been shutdown over a heavy water leak that was discovered last week.
The closure is expected to last a month, and to create a major shortage in the global supply of the isotopes used for medical imaging and treatment.
A reactor in Petten, in the Netherlands, is scheduled for a 12-week closure over the summer, said Dr. Jean Luc Urbain of the Canadian Association of Nuclear Medicine.
"The implications of having both the Petten reactor and the Chalk River reactor down would be very dire as those two reactors pretty well cover 80 per cent of the world market," Urbain told CTV's Canada AM on Wednesday.
"So it would be very difficult to supply the whole world with the other reactors that supply only 20 per cent of the market."
An isotope shortage could begin as early as Sunday.
Power outages in eastern Ontario and western Quebec led to the shutdown of the Chalk River reactor last Thursday, according to Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.
A heavy water leak was discovered the next day, which means the reactor may be out of commission for at least a month while officials investigate repair options.
The leaking water is being collected in drums, and "there is no threat to workers, the public, the environment or nuclear safety related to this event," the agency said in a news release issued on Monday.
The water is leaking at a rate of five kilograms per hour, the federally-owned AECL said. The leak is located at the base of the reactor vessel, where there is corrosion on the outside wall.
Urbain said isotopes are used in about 30,000 diagnostic tests each week in Canada.
When the shortage kicks in on the weekend, those procedures will likely be prioritized with only the most vital ones going ahead until the shortage ends.
Urbain said an Australian reactor is currently in the regulatory approval process, and will help ease the shortage once it gets the green light to produce isotopes.
In 2007, the Chalk River facility was shut down over safety concerns, leading to a worldwide isotope shortage until the federal government ordered the plant to resume production, despite the concerns.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(53)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Jay-TO
said
Nite Owl
said
Marg Bedore
said
Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said
This should NOT be about POLITICS but HEALTH and SAFETY.
The Liberals will go after the Conservatives, but the Liberals are just as responsible.
FORGET the finger pointing and FIX the problem which will be temporary at first and then possibly replacement.
Bart
said
J.C.
said
Maybe no one told them that the facility was already in trouble when the Liberals were in power and little to no attempt was made to fix the problem. In fact if I recall correctly the budget for them was cut back. At least since the Conservatives have been in power, the money for repairs etc. has increased.
The truth of the matter is that neglect of the facility for too many years has now reached its toll, and it is likely that a new modernized facility is necessary.
This is not the fault of the current government but it will ultimately be on them to find a solution as with many other things such as the military that was grossly underfunded etc. If you are going to assign fault then please do your homework first.
Michael from Toronto
said
Jackie Barrett
said
In the meantime, the government should invest money in building a new nuclear facility capable of producing medical isotopes to protect ourselves from frequent problems at Chalk River.
Sly
said
Paul in SJ
said
The fact of the matter is that AECL is solely responsible for this. It was their failure to develop the MAPLE reactor and it was their decisions that left Caanda, and the world, depending upon one of the earliest nuclear reactors in the world.
AECL is a bloated, buereaucratic mess and needs to be streamlined. The entire Chaulk River facility is falling apart.
You can't blame the regulator for this one, time for AECL to ante up and take its much needed medecine.
BMM
said
Bill Moyer Trenton
said
NOT a Torie in the Fraser Valley
said
Yes. It's silly, but let's be serious. Every time something like this happens, there will be some way to figure out who else there is to blame for a problem, how not to through money at it unless it's someone's friends company (or vested interest), because if it has anything to do with health care, education, or making money, we can't have that.
Tories, go rot under a rock, and waste your own money and your own time.
Amar
said
DL
said
He was warned 2 years ago ... so yes you CPC apologists ... it is the CPC's fault. They are not a pro-active government ... they are reactive and deceptive.
Get ready to be distracted from real issues like this!
Veritas in Ottawa
said
Bill
said
Concerned, and living in the East.
said
As for Eastern Canada, who cares?
Certainly not Harper!
Bobby
said
Due to the fact that most of the isotopes that are generated here have a very short half life. Not sure, but I believe they mostly produce Technetium which has a very short half life (6 hours I believe).
Josh - More than 36 months to cleauup Liberal Mess
said
But a Leader from the USA just visiting wouldn't know that.
Bob
said
Canada used to be a leader in Nuclear Technoogy. Thanks to the Conservatives it is going the same way as the Avro Arrow.
Denny in Saskatchewan
said
JKV Calgary
said
TimT
said
Nothing is for free people. It seems to me though, that the conservatives, hang on to this idea of having your cake and eating it too ( tax cuts ) a little more.
It's time there is less emphasis on the desperate desire for a majority government, and more emphasis on running this country for the good of the human beings that live here.
Perhaps less money to useless expensive attack ads, and more money to important things that saves lives?
Dave from NB - A have not and never will province
said
Janice Maxine - Jack Layton will replace Liberals
said
Gunnar
said
Reactive government? Well, at least they react. Under the PRO-Active Liberals, if the military needs more equipment, or the reactors need repair, or infrastructure needs money, the Liberals step up to the plate right away -- and give money to their friends for dubious causes.
I'm sorry the Conservatives have to be the ones to spend money because the Liberals weren't (and aren't) qualified to maintain a one-hole outhouse. I'm sorry you keep voting for them. And I'm sorry that many illnesses will remain undiagnosed due to the shortsightedness of the tax and spend Liberals. What part of "The Conservatives tripled the budget" did you miss?
GWALLIS
said
all soaked up in radiation and tritium
said
I hope you guys all appreciate the cancers WE get here because of this...
Ian Ottawa
said
Nick J Boragina
said
Doris- Cancer Victime don't use me for politics
said
I believe there is now a back up plan for Isoptopes from around the world so lts hope the cancer patients get the help they need.
Under going cancer treatment I do not want my suffering used as a political opportunity for anyone. Those playing politics with this could put their energy into a few prayers there are many of us out their, and our pain should be no one gain.
I will give up my medication for someone younger if necessary.
TG from Northern ON
said
due to radioactive decay, loses half of its useful material (50% loss) every 1.8 hours (radioactive half-life ). To supply a PET machine for use within an eight hour window, the manufacturer must produce approximately 30 times the quantity needed for an effective product following transit and preparation time of only 8 or 9 hours.
Eric Gisin, BC
said
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
Play partisan politics all you want with this one, folks...but the reliable failure of this key facility to maintain the fulfillment of the important demand for diagnostic isotopes represents a chronic failure of all your elected heroes in your federal government and Atomic Energy Canada Limited.
What a sad and silly embarrassment.
Steve from Saskatoon
said
This reactor needs to be replaced and the band-aid apporach to keeping going abandoned because people's lives depend on a secure supply of isotopes.
Jeff - Manitoba
said
Michael vdB - Chatham, ON
said
engineering vs politics
said
Upgrade chalk, fix the existing reactor -just because it's old doesn't mean it's bad- and get on with the job.
oh, and we really have to pare down the numbers of Liberal appointees who loyally support the corrupt party.
DANIEL H
said
Most of the comments here remind me of my ex. First complaining that I'm spending too much money maintaining the car, and then complaining she hasn't got a car because it broke down. You just can't keep everyone happy some days.
VOTE NDP! SHOW YOUR PEOTEST FOR PAST IDIOTS IN OFFICE!
San
said
Zeke in Perth
said
The Conservative government has not learned from the past, and will continue tro make the same mistakes again and again...
Ally
said
52 years old seems very old for a nuclear reactor, I have to assume that technology has come a long way since it was built.
Build a new one and shut this one down before it melts down!
Doug BC
said
The real question now,if Ontario wants to build more nuclear power generation in the future,who is going to build it?? AECL and good old Canadian technology seem to be a few steps behind right now.Will Ontario look to buy the best reactors at the fairest price,or will they be obliged to buy more of AECL's technology??
And finally,what is going on with those famous Maple Leaf reactors?? Are they still way over budget,behind schedule,and not working??
Yes.This should be about health and reliable and affordable electricity,and NOT about politics.Though I am certain AECL is content to let the Liberals and the Conservatives beat each other up over this.As long as AECL isn't dragged into the blame game.
And please,none of the politically partisan posts here answer any REAL questions,or offer any real path to resolving this problem.We get enough crap from politicians,we really don't need a lot more here.
If we need new,let's get busy and build it.If AECL can't deliver,someone else will.Decades of subsidizing AECL with our tax dollars may well have been a huge mistake.What does that say about our "world class" technology and our "cutting edge research"?? Are we flogging a dead horse with AECL?? No one else wants this technology either.That must say something about it.
Mike
said
Either way looks like Linda Keen was right about the state of the current reactors. We're working with rusted-out reactor vessels??
Gence Nointeli
said
Would you and your family like to go boating with me today?
Paul in SJ
said
How many of you have tried to design and build a fission reactor specifically engineered to leave behind very delicate and short lived radiological isotopes?
These reactors are not objects than can be go from an idea into existance with any great speed. The last time AECL tried to create a replacement for NRU, the MAPLE reactor, they had design problems that made the new design unsafe. That project lasted around 15 years....
Before you throw out a government for not doing anything, ask yourself this, how many torie MPs hold PhDs in nuclear physics, engineering or advanced metallurgy....
Fusion
said
Pip
said
As for blaming the current government - or the Liberals for that matter - why bother? let's face it, AECL was charged years (or is it decades?)ago with developing a replacement reactor - the MAPLE - and guess what? It's still not working and may never work. I wonder why. Is it due to the incompetence of our nuclear engineers, or the overly obsessive safety demands of bureaucrats and anti-nuclear politicians, who want so many "failsafe" additions that the design is itself compromised to the point of failing to work? Who add on yet another "safety" requirement just before a test, and add another few million dollars worth of cost. How much does each meeting to determine the new safety requirement cost?
If it is the engineers at fault, hire people who know their job. If it is the bureaucrats and politicians, then we would do better to purchase our isotope from another country, as the inertia of these people ('crats)is incredible. They will never allow the engineers to do their job.
Like all the green-earthers, they want a 110% safe facility that does not pollute; they want to get rid of coal- oil- and gas-fired generating stations but are unwilling to let the engineers design a reactor that doesn't need their bureaucratic input. As for permitting transmission lines to be built. . .
PJ
said
John OConnor Owen Sound
said
Bryan from Cobourg
said
I agree with a previous comment "the fact of the matter is that AECL is solely responsible for this." AECL's failure to develop a MAPLE reactor that would pass licensing by the regulator is at fault. Instead of a whole new redesign why wouldn't they just build on a successful design and get it passed by the regulator and start producing radioisotopes reliably to supply the market.
Wake up Canada...the Americans will step in to supply the market soon and we'll be left with ghosts in Chalk River.
Nuclear Technology is Mature and safe
said
Isn't it time to simply use proven technology, push the politics aside, and get on with it?