CTV News | Isotope shortage could lead to medical test delays

Canada -   

Isotope shortage could lead to medical test delays

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Graham Richardson on the shortage
CTV Newsnet: Dr. Christopher O'Brien, Ontario Association of Nuclear Medicine, on the shortage concerns
Power Play: House leaders panel with Ralph Goodale, Libby Davies and Tom Lukiwski on the political concerns

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(53)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Wed. May. 20 2009 8:58 AM ET

The shutdown of Ontario's Chalk River nuclear reactor could have "dire" implications if it overlaps with the scheduled shutdown of a European reactor that also produces the vital medical isotopes, according to one expert.

The problem-plagued Ontario reactor has been shutdown over a heavy water leak that was discovered last week.

The closure is expected to last a month, and to create a major shortage in the global supply of the isotopes used for medical imaging and treatment.

A reactor in Petten, in the Netherlands, is scheduled for a 12-week closure over the summer, said Dr. Jean Luc Urbain of the Canadian Association of Nuclear Medicine.

"The implications of having both the Petten reactor and the Chalk River reactor down would be very dire as those two reactors pretty well cover 80 per cent of the world market," Urbain told CTV's Canada AM on Wednesday.

"So it would be very difficult to supply the whole world with the other reactors that supply only 20 per cent of the market."

An isotope shortage could begin as early as Sunday.

Power outages in eastern Ontario and western Quebec led to the shutdown of the Chalk River reactor last Thursday, according to Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.

A heavy water leak was discovered the next day, which means the reactor may be out of commission for at least a month while officials investigate repair options.

The leaking water is being collected in drums, and "there is no threat to workers, the public, the environment or nuclear safety related to this event," the agency said in a news release issued on Monday.

The water is leaking at a rate of five kilograms per hour, the federally-owned AECL said. The leak is located at the base of the reactor vessel, where there is corrosion on the outside wall.

Urbain said isotopes are used in about 30,000 diagnostic tests each week in Canada.

When the shortage kicks in on the weekend, those procedures will likely be prioritized with only the most vital ones going ahead until the shortage ends.

Urbain said an Australian reactor is currently in the regulatory approval process, and will help ease the shortage once it gets the green light to produce isotopes.

In 2007, the Chalk River facility was shut down over safety concerns, leading to a worldwide isotope shortage until the federal government ordered the plant to resume production, despite the concerns.

Comments are now closed for this story

Jay-TO
said

LOL. Great timing. I suppose Linda Keen or some other employee who may have voted liberal in the past 20 years is responsible. God I can't wait for the next election. Tory no more.


Nite Owl
said

Wait for it. Here comes the government's response. Nothing To See Here! Move Along Canada! Look Everybody, Ignatieff Lived Outside Of Canada For A While. We Never Said It Was Safe. We Were Mislead. It's The Liberal Media's Fault.


Marg Bedore
said

Who will the Conservatives blame this time?


Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said

The reactor is 52 years old and should be repaired and plans made for replacement.

This should NOT be about POLITICS but HEALTH and SAFETY.

The Liberals will go after the Conservatives, but the Liberals are just as responsible.

FORGET the finger pointing and FIX the problem which will be temporary at first and then possibly replacement.


Bart
said

Why is there only a one week supply coming out of this reactor?


J.C.
said

I don't belong to any political party but boy the opposition in the first three comments sure like to bash the conservatives.
Maybe no one told them that the facility was already in trouble when the Liberals were in power and little to no attempt was made to fix the problem. In fact if I recall correctly the budget for them was cut back. At least since the Conservatives have been in power, the money for repairs etc. has increased.
The truth of the matter is that neglect of the facility for too many years has now reached its toll, and it is likely that a new modernized facility is necessary.
This is not the fault of the current government but it will ultimately be on them to find a solution as with many other things such as the military that was grossly underfunded etc. If you are going to assign fault then please do your homework first.


Michael from Toronto
said

You cannot just go out and buy another nuclear reactor and facility. This is not a political issue but a technical problem that requires a lot of lead time and money. Quit whining and let the govt get on with the work.


Jackie Barrett
said

Let's hope Stephen Harper will intervene and order the Chalk River facility open to ensure adequate supply of medical isotopes.

In the meantime, the government should invest money in building a new nuclear facility capable of producing medical isotopes to protect ourselves from frequent problems at Chalk River.


Sly
said

HMMM Funny now it is forget the finger pointing but of course the Conservative will say there is no problem just like everything else ie economy......


Paul in SJ
said

Well, this should really be of no surprise. How many of us are driving cars that are 50+ years old?

The fact of the matter is that AECL is solely responsible for this. It was their failure to develop the MAPLE reactor and it was their decisions that left Caanda, and the world, depending upon one of the earliest nuclear reactors in the world.

AECL is a bloated, buereaucratic mess and needs to be streamlined. The entire Chaulk River facility is falling apart.

You can't blame the regulator for this one, time for AECL to ante up and take its much needed medecine.


BMM
said

The Liberals should start telling the truth and stop politicizing this issue. It is too important for them to be playing politics with. Linda keen was not fired for shutting down the reactor. She was fired for waiting for over two years to shut down the reactor after she knew of the problems and then blaming others for her incompetance. Had she done so in 2005 when the problems were identified it would have been only a one week shutdown. She failed to do so (presumably because her Liberal task masters of the day did not want her to do so?). At the first opportunity after Tories came to power she ordered a shutdown blaming the new government and the AECL for negligence when in fact it was her actions that caused the problem in the first place.


Bill Moyer Trenton
said

In the last 52 years, the Liberals and Conservatives have allowed this reactor to age and they have both failed to fund a replacement. A new reactor is going to cost a lot more than even the new enhanced funding the AECL is now getting. They will need billions more.


NOT a Torie in the Fraser Valley
said

Here's the prime opportunity for the Tories to say "well, this isn't our mess, this is someone else's. Infact, the Liberals, nope, NDPs. Uh, Green Party. Well, tell you what. It's a really bad economy. So we'll shut it down for good. It's a money waster. But I know of a good investment opportunity for the Canadian people with a couple of car companies and a dying airline that we need to throw billions of dollars at with a guaranteed no return investment. It's a sure win!"

Yes. It's silly, but let's be serious. Every time something like this happens, there will be some way to figure out who else there is to blame for a problem, how not to through money at it unless it's someone's friends company (or vested interest), because if it has anything to do with health care, education, or making money, we can't have that.

Tories, go rot under a rock, and waste your own money and your own time.


Amar
said

"Tories have tripled the AECL budget since 2006"... that is because the liberals reduced the budget to basically nothing...


DL
said

Harper must be trying to figure out which legacy Liberal to fire ... if there are any left.

He was warned 2 years ago ... so yes you CPC apologists ... it is the CPC's fault. They are not a pro-active government ... they are reactive and deceptive.

Get ready to be distracted from real issues like this!


Veritas in Ottawa
said

We are subsidizing AECL to the tune of $1.2 Billion and the products that are in demand we can't make enough of. What is this Bre-X? Canadians are so paranoid of building new nuclear power facilities that they ignorantly keep coal generating plants in southern Ont blowing coal residue. And if you think Quebec will lend Ont a helping hand think again, look what they did to Newfoundland! (resold cheap Churchill Falls, Newfoundland power to the US grid for huge profits.) Ont has to start building new facilities to prepare for the inevitable brown outs that are coming. Least we forget, during the big US blackout, we in Ottawa were totally dark while across the Ottawa river in Hull/Gatineau everything was well lit up. That sums up everything.


Bill
said

FUM>>>>>>>>>This surfuaced some years ago and was scheduled to be repaired.The suggestion was to be a new facility ...what happened...When is the government going to do something or anything???I don't care what party is in power ,but it would be nice to see a government acoomplish something.Or let it fail!!!!


Concerned, and living in the East.
said

Europe will help with supplies to Western Canada.....
As for Eastern Canada, who cares?
Certainly not Harper!


Bobby
said

Bart said "Why is there only a one week supply coming out of this reactor?"

Due to the fact that most of the isotopes that are generated here have a very short half life. Not sure, but I believe they mostly produce Technetium which has a very short half life (6 hours I believe).



Josh - More than 36 months to cleauup Liberal Mess
said

It takes more time to build a reactor that Harper has been in power so had we started one 10 yrs ago it would ready now.
But a Leader from the USA just visiting wouldn't know that.


Bob
said

Like the others, I wonder who the government hacks will blame this one on.
Canada used to be a leader in Nuclear Technoogy. Thanks to the Conservatives it is going the same way as the Avro Arrow.


Denny in Saskatchewan
said

Why does half the worlds isotope supply come from this aging facility? Surely other countries are going to be growing tired of these constant isotope shortages and develop alternative suppliers.


JKV Calgary
said

Reading this makes me wonder why the government would be looking at proping-up the failing auto industry with billions of tax payers dollars and not putting this money into replacing this reactor? It seems to me to be a no-brainer...


TimT
said

enjoy your tax cuts everybody! To all you regular Canadians who are getting trinkets from the government promises of tax cuts while corporations get the real tax cuts, enjoy. Enjoy your few hundred a year or whatever while our infrastructure crumbles, and we get skyrocketing deficits. No this isn't just a conservative bash, although they are the ones in power now, promising these tax cuts, but the liberals are equally as responsible for letting important things, like this crumble.

Nothing is for free people. It seems to me though, that the conservatives, hang on to this idea of having your cake and eating it too ( tax cuts ) a little more.

It's time there is less emphasis on the desperate desire for a majority government, and more emphasis on running this country for the good of the human beings that live here.

Perhaps less money to useless expensive attack ads, and more money to important things that saves lives?


Dave from NB - A have not and never will province
said

This problem is just a continuation of problems that Chalk River has had. I was living in Petawawa in the mid 70's and they were having problems then. Technology has advanced in the field of Nuclear Reactors and we should be getting on the band wagon. Here in NB we have a reactor at Point Lepro and we have spent almost enough to build a new facility just in repairs. We seem to be puting tens of millions of dollars annualy into that sink hole under the guise of repairs. It is once again off line (nothing unusual)and they are looking at 40M$ for repairs. We have enough electricity for our domestic use, but we have sold our souls to the States and we must maintain our commitment to then. They, however, don't have to worry about repairing the plant when it goes off line. I think Chalk River should rethink its repairs and build a new facility. No wonder the Ontario government is going bankrupt. We already are. Vive la difference


Janice Maxine - Jack Layton will replace Liberals
said

This is not really an election issue it is a problem Canda needs to address and it will take a decade to build a reactor. The 13 yrs this reeactoer was neglected could not be undone in 36 months. Jack Layton will replace the Liberals as the official opposition if an election is called, so lets see if the Liberals really want an election over this, the NDP was ahead of the Liberals last election they just need to finish better.



Gunnar
said

52 years old, and somehow this is the fault of the Conservatives. Ever heard of Trudeau, Chretien or Martin?

Reactive government? Well, at least they react. Under the PRO-Active Liberals, if the military needs more equipment, or the reactors need repair, or infrastructure needs money, the Liberals step up to the plate right away -- and give money to their friends for dubious causes.

I'm sorry the Conservatives have to be the ones to spend money because the Liberals weren't (and aren't) qualified to maintain a one-hole outhouse. I'm sorry you keep voting for them. And I'm sorry that many illnesses will remain undiagnosed due to the shortsightedness of the tax and spend Liberals. What part of "The Conservatives tripled the budget" did you miss?


GWALLIS
said

With the construction of new reactors at the Darlington facility it might be a great opportunity to incorporate a new isotope facility into that design.


all soaked up in radiation and tritium
said

Niiiiiiice. This is literally in my backyard. This leak, the one back in January (tritium release)that I didn't find out for a month as it was covered up.

I hope you guys all appreciate the cancers WE get here because of this...


Ian Ottawa
said

I wonder if the public should be made aware of the amount of radioactive waste that are stored at Chaulk River that aren't paid for because once its there the company walks away? The costs are staggering and would help in the updating or expansion this facility requires. Why is this the major producer? Lets use the need for Isotops to our advantage instead of again giving it away to other Countries.


Nick J Boragina
said

How about the world get their own isotopes. Why do we have to carry the burden for them?


Doris- Cancer Victime don't use me for politics
said

NOT a political issue it is about a potential health crisis.
I believe there is now a back up plan for Isoptopes from around the world so lts hope the cancer patients get the help they need.
Under going cancer treatment I do not want my suffering used as a political opportunity for anyone. Those playing politics with this could put their energy into a few prayers there are many of us out their, and our pain should be no one gain.
I will give up my medication for someone younger if necessary.


TG from Northern ON
said

To Bart

due to radioactive decay, loses half of its useful material (50% loss) every 1.8 hours (radioactive half-life ). To supply a PET machine for use within an eight hour window, the manufacturer must produce approximately 30 times the quantity needed for an effective product following transit and preparation time of only 8 or 9 hours.


Eric Gisin, BC
said

Why is it that the world depends on an aging Canadian isotope reactor for nearly all its medical supplies? These are not high tech, why doesn't the US, UK, France or India have some to insure world supplies?


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

PURE GOVERNMENTAL FAILURE

Play partisan politics all you want with this one, folks...but the reliable failure of this key facility to maintain the fulfillment of the important demand for diagnostic isotopes represents a chronic failure of all your elected heroes in your federal government and Atomic Energy Canada Limited.

What a sad and silly embarrassment.



Steve from Saskatoon
said

The sad thing is that nothing was learned from the last time this reactor had to be shut down. Why was there not a stockpile of isotopes created?
This reactor needs to be replaced and the band-aid apporach to keeping going abandoned because people's lives depend on a secure supply of isotopes.


Jeff - Manitoba
said

I bet if most of you spent half as much effort emailing your MP or getting involved in the issues, you'd get problems like this solved. But alas, all anyone does is whine, complain and point fingers at each other in a venue that no one of consequence will ever read. I don't care who you are, if you have a problem with how things are going, either do something about it or leave the discussion to those willing to act.


Michael vdB - Chatham, ON
said

What is past is past. Harper knew this problem would not go away and so invested more money into the regulator. The question still remains, is there a plan to replace the aging facility?


engineering vs politics
said

Hmmm, chalk river needs some engineering work. OK, not difficult if the polticos will get out of the way. I would note that every time a budget item comes up to devote money to building a new facility the NDP (to whom the word nuclear is anathema) and the Libs all go into high speed wobble to stop it.
Upgrade chalk, fix the existing reactor -just because it's old doesn't mean it's bad- and get on with the job.

oh, and we really have to pare down the numbers of Liberal appointees who loyally support the corrupt party.


DANIEL H
said

Rather than all the finger pointing let's get real here. Industrial failures occur because of poor designs, poor maintenance, incorrect operation, and other similar reasons. Of course it takes money to do the right things. Who decided the amount of money that was wrong when will never be resolved. However, let's get past that and figure out how to make things right. We either need to get proper repairs done or build a new reactor. Unfortunately building a reactor takes years.

Most of the comments here remind me of my ex. First complaining that I'm spending too much money maintaining the car, and then complaining she hasn't got a car because it broke down. You just can't keep everyone happy some days.

VOTE NDP! SHOW YOUR PEOTEST FOR PAST IDIOTS IN OFFICE!


San
said

And why is there a hold-up in building at least one more site to manufacture these isotopes? Does this mean the country with the most money get top priority in receiving the remaining isotopes?


Zeke in Perth
said

So who'll get fired now? Seems to me they should have known better than to put all their faith in one source... AGAIN.

The Conservative government has not learned from the past, and will continue tro make the same mistakes again and again...


Ally
said

It is frightening to hear that there is a leak in the reactor and absolutely necessary to shut it down for repairs, isotopes or not.

52 years old seems very old for a nuclear reactor, I have to assume that technology has come a long way since it was built.

Build a new one and shut this one down before it melts down!


Doug BC
said

A 50 year old reactor has problems,and some how this is Harper's fault.You have got to be kidding me.You have to have your head in the sand,or be a left wing blogger to believe that.This facility has been in trouble for years.And funding under the Liberals went the same way as funding for the military.DOWN THE DRAIN.
The real question now,if Ontario wants to build more nuclear power generation in the future,who is going to build it?? AECL and good old Canadian technology seem to be a few steps behind right now.Will Ontario look to buy the best reactors at the fairest price,or will they be obliged to buy more of AECL's technology??
And finally,what is going on with those famous Maple Leaf reactors?? Are they still way over budget,behind schedule,and not working??
Yes.This should be about health and reliable and affordable electricity,and NOT about politics.Though I am certain AECL is content to let the Liberals and the Conservatives beat each other up over this.As long as AECL isn't dragged into the blame game.
And please,none of the politically partisan posts here answer any REAL questions,or offer any real path to resolving this problem.We get enough crap from politicians,we really don't need a lot more here.
If we need new,let's get busy and build it.If AECL can't deliver,someone else will.Decades of subsidizing AECL with our tax dollars may well have been a huge mistake.What does that say about our "world class" technology and our "cutting edge research"?? Are we flogging a dead horse with AECL?? No one else wants this technology either.That must say something about it.


Mike
said

Actually, the Liberals provided funding for the replacement MAPLE reactors however, the scientists weren't successful with getting them to work properly. Now I don't know if that's because funding for that project wasn't afforded to them once the Conservatives came into power or was it just deemed to expensive to develop properly.
Either way looks like Linda Keen was right about the state of the current reactors. We're working with rusted-out reactor vessels??


Gence Nointeli
said

Re: Jackie Barrett & others. I have a boat that is over 50 yrs old, with obvious corrosion, a noticeable leak, & everyone in town warns that it has had many owners, & they have badly neglected it for many years & is a health hazard. Its only asset is an experienced & capable crew, but lately they have become a bunch of crybabies, so we will do without them.
Would you and your family like to go boating with me today?


Paul in SJ
said

Ok people. As so many of you have said that the government should have learnt their lesson form the last time NRU had to be shut down....

How many of you have tried to design and build a fission reactor specifically engineered to leave behind very delicate and short lived radiological isotopes?

These reactors are not objects than can be go from an idea into existance with any great speed. The last time AECL tried to create a replacement for NRU, the MAPLE reactor, they had design problems that made the new design unsafe. That project lasted around 15 years....

Before you throw out a government for not doing anything, ask yourself this, how many torie MPs hold PhDs in nuclear physics, engineering or advanced metallurgy....


Fusion
said

Nuclear reactors are extremely costly and costly maintenance intensive. Canada should invest heavily into scientific research towards developing a fusion reactor; which could solve many problems that are now associated with nuclear reactors. Plus, we would be leaders in fusion technology which will be the one of the fuels that will power civilization into the future.


Pip
said

Talk about having all your eggs in one basket!

As for blaming the current government - or the Liberals for that matter - why bother? let's face it, AECL was charged years (or is it decades?)ago with developing a replacement reactor - the MAPLE - and guess what? It's still not working and may never work. I wonder why. Is it due to the incompetence of our nuclear engineers, or the overly obsessive safety demands of bureaucrats and anti-nuclear politicians, who want so many "failsafe" additions that the design is itself compromised to the point of failing to work? Who add on yet another "safety" requirement just before a test, and add another few million dollars worth of cost. How much does each meeting to determine the new safety requirement cost?

If it is the engineers at fault, hire people who know their job. If it is the bureaucrats and politicians, then we would do better to purchase our isotope from another country, as the inertia of these people ('crats)is incredible. They will never allow the engineers to do their job.

Like all the green-earthers, they want a 110% safe facility that does not pollute; they want to get rid of coal- oil- and gas-fired generating stations but are unwilling to let the engineers design a reactor that doesn't need their bureaucratic input. As for permitting transmission lines to be built. . .


PJ
said

Some people are still talking about those Maple reactors, and to get somebody else to build the new Isotope Reactor, that's what AECL did with the Maple, they took a France design they should have sticked with there design, NRU is 52 years old that means it's a good design, build a new reactor build AECL design (like NRU)it works.


John OConnor Owen Sound
said

I dont hear anything about Maple 1&2 built by Acel. They cant get them to operate without the risk of them becoming Bombs. How many millions did this boondoggle cost the Canadian Taxpayer?????


Bryan from Cobourg
said

If a car is still running after 50 years then it's a good design! I think the same should be said about the reactor in question.
I agree with a previous comment "the fact of the matter is that AECL is solely responsible for this." AECL's failure to develop a MAPLE reactor that would pass licensing by the regulator is at fault. Instead of a whole new redesign why wouldn't they just build on a successful design and get it passed by the regulator and start producing radioisotopes reliably to supply the market.
Wake up Canada...the Americans will step in to supply the market soon and we'll be left with ghosts in Chalk River.


Nuclear Technology is Mature and safe
said

The technology already exists to replace the old reactor. The design is mature, but because it isn't "new" the bureaucracy won't allow it.

Isn't it time to simply use proven technology, push the politics aside, and get on with it?


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz