Canada -
News Sections
Canadian pork safe to eat, officials reiterate
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(27)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. May. 6 2009 4:25 PM ET
Canada's agriculture minister and top veterinary officer emphasized again Wednesday that pork is safe to eat, after comments by a WHO official added to the confusion surrounding the H1N1 virus.
"Canadian pork is safe. There is no danger. Bottom line: Canadian pork is safe," Gerry Ritz said Wednesday after serving up pork sandwiches to MPs and government workers at a luncheon on Parliament Hill.
Earlier in the day, however, the director of WHO's Department of Food Safety, Zoonoses and Foodborne Diseases told Reuters the blood and meat of pigs infected with a swine subtype of H1N1 may contain the virus.
Jorgen Schlundt cautioned against eating meat from sick and dead pigs infected with swine flu since the virus might survive.
But Canadian officials say that pigs sickened with the virus are not put to market, so the warning is redundant. Pigs that have recovered from the virus can go to market because they pose no threat to people, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency says.
Dr. Brian Evans of CFIA, said Schlundt had not said anything new.
"The message that is coming out clearly from WHO today, which is standard operating practice in Canada, is the fact that you do not slaughter sick animals and you do not slaughter dead animals for human consumption," he said.
"This doesn't change anything in Canada. What the WHO is saying is what we do every day, every week, every month, every year as part of our food inspection system."
The Canadian food system has safeguards to keep diseased pigs from making it to the market, Evans said, including screenings on farms, at slaughterhouses, and on the processing line.
"There is no reason to stop eating pork," added Dr. David Butler-Jones, Canada's chief public health officer. "The inspection system in Canada does address all those issues."
Jurgen Preugschas, president of the Canadian Pork Council, told CTV Newsnet said he was "concerned" about the WHO official's comments.
"But what most important to know is that any animal that is sick or unhealthy does not go to market," he said from Parliament Hill. "We have a great inspection system through CFIA, it is absolutely safe to eat the pork that we produce."
Since CFIA announced on Saturday that a herd in Alberta had contracted the H1N1 virus about a dozen countries have banned Canadian swine or pork, including China and Russia.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(27)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Roger T
said
What else would these people say to calm fears, of course it's all good to eat while the virus is continually spreading from people to people and now human to pigs, is it really that safe!
No thanks to pork.
Matt
said
Layton in Moncton
said
That's right the Chinese ambassador can go on CTV, CBC who ever they choose, but they must demonstrate the science behind the ban. I say give em oh, 48 hours to do so, then start cutting oil shipments to them and I dunno, maybe a 100% punitive tarrif on Chinese goods until the ban on pork is dropped. Just a thought.
Ray
said
zing
said
MAL
said
I will gladly eat Alberta pork or any other province's and the banning countries can have a nice bowl of wheat germ.
tim
said
What sensationalist hype. Oh well, pork is cheaper now at No Frills and I am going to take adavantage.
LF
said
Dan Moyer
said
Send me Pork (and Chicken)
said
Now, with Swine, everything is different?
I would have no hesitation to eat either the pork or the chicken because I am confident it is all safe when cooked properly. I also know that a lot of good poultry went to waste. The problem is that the public gets sent mixed messages - all "based on science' and they do not know what to believe. Who can blame them?
When people tell lies it becomes very hard to believe anything. When a government tells lies, it is even harder and no one knows when the truth is being spoken.
You can send me the pork, but I sure wish we could be confident we get the truth on things. If we had a government that understood science, they would realize that it is not wise to manipulate it to suit the day. We are getting what we asked for and unfortunately the Pork Farmers are getting the bill for it - at least this time.
Norm in St-Laurent
said
Mike
said
I don't agree with the ban of Canadian pork but I do think that the science does back up the claim that handling live or uncooked pork with the strain of this virus could pass it along (in both directions).
I only eat cooked pork and I wash my hands when handling raw meat.
raj
said
Sara
said
The regular flu kills more people each year than the Swine Flu - which they've all said is mild. In fact, eating pork with some swine flu might build up resistance.
Yay for pork!
Safe to eat?
said
Health officials told lawmakers Wednesday it took only two weeks to identify the genetic characteristics of swine flu, and they are in good position to quickly produce a vaccine if the flu takes a turn for the worse.
At the same time, the officials cautioned members of a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee that "there are still elements of what they called the novel 2009 H1N1 influenza virus that they don't understand," and it was not time for complacency.
Now, if the CDC and other scientists can not and do not understand the complexities of the "new swine flu," meaning the DNA Structure of the Virus...why do they say it is safe to eat pork?
Also what I find quite informative is this fact: Dr. Dennis Carroll, special adviser on pandemic flu to the U.S. Agency for International Development, noted that the 1918-1919 flu pandemic also began in the spring and was initially mild, but a much more lethal version hit six months later and the virus eventually killed 50 million worldwide.
Safe to eat?
No thanks...I'll wait until the DNA Structure is broken down and the full understanding of the Virus is exposed.
SB
said
Our pork is completely safe to eat...when proper handling and cooking procedures are followed (virus's cannot survive extreme heat temps...even if the pig were infected).
Wish I were having pork for dinner tonight!!
R D
said
James from Vancouver
said
Mike Tmcna
said
Dave Williams
said
Many news programs including W-5, Fifth Estate
Has shown issues with Chinese fish products containing antimicrobial agents not approved for use North America and considered a carcinogen nitrofuran, malachite green, gentian violet and fluoroquinolone
When do we say enough is enough
Reid
said
Reece
said
No thanks. I'm off pork for the next 5 years.
Send me Pork (and Chicken)
said
Chickens do show signs of Avian Flu or any other flu. In the Fraser Valley during the worst outbreak, infected flocks had mortality rates over 80%. i.e. most of the infected flocks died.
Chickens do cough and it is very evident when chickens are sick.
There was no scientific reason for quarantining production during that time, but it was done - by provincial jurisdictions - never mind the Chinese or any other foreign government! (And I am not suggesting that anyone would eat the chickens that had died.)
afan
said
It seems H1N1 A flu virus with genes from bird, pig and human had been in the swine population in North America for a long while. I did search and found the report at the CDC (Centres of Disease Control and Prevention, USA) web site that can divulge non biased scientific information for the public to draw their own inference and judgement on the pork concern.
Go to CDC official web site at cdc.gov/eid/content/14/9/1470.htm
"Epidermelogy of Infectious Disease Journal",Volume 14, Number 9–September 2008
Doug BC
said
As to the chickens in the Fraser Valley,I believe they were destroyed to prevent the virus from spreading even further.Not because they were unsafe to eat.
I MIGHT be concerned if I was eating this meat raw.But even at that,MIGHT,is the key word there.Cooking destroys almost every virus known.In fact,I believe that's one of the ways our bodies fght off viral infections as well.We get fevers that make our bodies very unhospitable hosts to the virus.
HaHa.Good post "R D".It reminds me of a lawyer who once asked a doctor how many autopsies he had performed on dead people.To which the doctor replied "all of the autopsies I've performed have been on dead people".
Now,I'm off to BBQ some pork spare ribs.I hope those now in a state of panic can find something that meets their "safety" concerns,AND tastes as good.Lord only knows what that will be,or where they will find it.Fish caught here,but processed in China? Are you kidding me?
Joe H
said
Lz in Edmonton
said
If the flu is now "mild" then what a great way to enjoy the BBQ and get immunity at the same time. Though this isn't true, flu viruses are killed with heat over a certain temperature anyway and nobody I know eats RAW pork.
Perhaps the WHO is like Egypt. They killed all the heards of SWINE and destroyed the livelihood of a certain religious minority there. A hint: No Muslim eats pork. I wonder what that means.... hum....