CTV News | Despite Fiat threat, CAW says no to more concessions

Canada -   

Despite Fiat threat, CAW says no to more concessions

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Graham Richardson with Fiat fallout
CTV Toronto: Paul Bliss on the crossroads for Fiat, Chrysler and the CAW
CTV Newsnet: Bernie Wolf, Schulich School of Business, on why the CAW may be being 'unrealistic'
Power Play: Ken Lewenza, CAW president, responds to Fiat's accusations and David Shepardson, The Detroit News
CTV Newsnet: Buzz Hargrove, former CAW president, says 'our government doesn't know what their doing'
CTV Toronto: Paul Bliss on the tense talks between FIAT and the CAW

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(140)

ctvtoronto.ca

Date: Wed. Apr. 15 2009 10:03 PM ET

Despite a threat from Fiat that it may walk away from a merger with Chrysler unless workers make more concessions, the head of the Canadian Auto Workers says the union won't stray from its previously established negotiation pattern.

Ken Lewenza said the union won't concede anymore of wage cuts than it did in its recent agreement with General Motors, but is willing to help troubled Chrysler find savings in other ways.

"We always said that the economic pattern is important to the auto industry to make sure that one company doesn't have an advantage or a disadvantage, but we also said to Chrysler that we'll use our creativity, the same as we've done in the past, to increase productivity and increase the bottom line at Chrysler without touching the economic pattern," Lewenza told a news conference Wednesday.

The GM agreement is estimated to save the automaker about $7 an hour per worker.

But Fiat CEO Sergio Marchionne told the Globe and Mail the company will renege on a proposed partnership with the struggling North American automaker if the CAW doesn't cut its compensation package by $19 an hour.

The cut would whittle their wages down to $55 an hour -- including so-called "legacy costs" such as pensions and other benefits -- the rate Toyota and Honda workers make in the U.S.

Fiat's hard line to the CAW was immediately repeated by senior Canadian government officials.

"CAW is going to have to realize that Chrysler has to be cost competitive with Toyota and Honda, not just Ford and GM," Industry Minister Tony Clement said Wednesday.

Speaking on CTV's Power Play, Lewenza disputed the dollar numbers that Fiat was using and said he was "surprised by the comments."

"I'd like to talk to Sergio (Marchionne) and ask him where he got those numbers," he said. "I'm disputing those numbers."

The Italian automaker has emerged as Chrysler's best hope for survival after both American and Canadian governments told the company it would not provide a bailout loan until it came up with a satisfactory long-term restructuring plan.

"Absolutely we are prepared to walk. There is no doubt in my mind," Marchionne told the Globe from Fiat headquarters in Turin. "We cannot commit to this organization unless we see light at the end of the tunnel."

He said as of now, there is a 50 per cent chance the partnership agreement will go through.

Chrysler has 15 days left to reach a deal with Fiat that would satisfy the federal governments.

A non-binding agreement reached between the two companies in January gives Fiat a 35 per cent stake in Chrysler.

Fiat is not investing money into the company but instead is giving Chrysler access to its successful platforms for small cars and access to fuel-efficent, eco-friendly technology for engines. In exchange, Fiat would gain access to the North American market.

If Chrysler fails to form a partnership with Fiat, the company will go bankrupt and tens of thousands of jobs will be lost.

Tom LaSorda, Chrysler's president, said the company needs to cut its labour costs by about $20 an hour in order to compete with foreign automakers who also manufacture cars in Canada. Those who work in Canadian assembly plants manufacturing Japanese cars get paid around $47 an hour while those who work for North American manufacturers make around $76 an hour.

If labour costs can't be cut, LaSorda warned that Chrysler may have to shut down its operations in Canada.

CAW 'too tough'

Lewenza has said repeatedly that Chrysler's problems run deeper than the wages of the company's unionized workers and that it should look at other solutions to restructure the company effectively.

The CAW's position on negotiations is "too tough," according to Tony Faria, an auto industry analyst.

Faria, the co-director of the automotive research centre at the University of Windsor, said the CAW might be putting Canadian jobs at risk, particularly if Chrysler is able to reach a better deal with its unionized American workers.

I felt all along that the CAW has been too tough in their negotiations in Canada and that has lost us jobs in Canada to lower labour-cost countries," Faria said in an interview with The Canadian Press.

One of the concessions the American United Auto Workers union has made is to agree to a two-tier wage system where current employees retain their current wages but new hires will make significantly less in benefits and wages.

"If we ever get to a point in time where the North American market starts turning back up again ... they're going to be hiring back workers at a significantly lower rate based on the two-tier wage system now in effect at their plants in the U.S.," Faria said.

"That doesn't bode well for future auto assembly CAW jobs in Canada, and that's something the CAW just has to recognize: that it may be much, much better to have jobs at a little bit lower labour rate than to have no jobs whatsoever," he added.

With files from The Canadian Press and a report from CTV Toronto's Paul Bliss

Please Add Comments( )

Roger T
said
0 0

Fiat should go into deeper demands by TELLING Chrysler that they need to dismantle the Union itself. Unions can be dangerous as it sometimes runs the corporation when they don't get their demands when times are good.

I hope Fiat does not come to Chrysler's rescue as it will only incur more debt loads from a dying brand.

Lets see how the Union will react to Fiat's demand now that the tides have turned.

This goes for the 2010 Olympics also, Harper snubbed the Beijing openning now it's the Chinese that will have the upper hands with the rich cash flow they have for investments. Day is on a begging spree to save Harper's gov't from free fall IF more people nad businesses are out of work.

When times are good you can't abuse your negotiation power because it can back fire at times of desparations.


Julie
said
0 0

Maybe Fiat will be the one to finally knock some sense into CAW. Barring that, arrivederci to Chrysler, CAW, and everyone else involved. This craziness has gone on long enough.


Rob - Winnipeg
said
0 0

The CAW better understand clearly that failure to agree to the reduced all-in rate of 47 per hour is a lot better than going on Employment Insurance.

And don't give me that old CAW crap that you deserve 70 plus per hour. I've had 4 years of University training in the computer field and earn 33 per hour - which is damned good salary to live on.

To CAW - my final work is suck it up and take less - or go on EI when the company files for bankruptcy.

To Chrysler - if you can't operate in Ontario with the CAW - move your plants to Winnipeg Manitoba where I know you'll have thousnads of people begging for jobs at 30 dollars per hour.


Sunny in Sudbury
said
0 0

Pretty simple, do the workers want 40 hours/week at $25.00/hr OR 0 hours at $0/hr.
The economy has changed significantly, we as workers must change as well.


Sean Calder - Chatham ON
said
0 0

If the CAW doesn't get that they're not competing against costs, but against foreign wages, and they continue to dig in their heels while turning a blind eye to reality, they will be their own demise.

Ken Lewenza et al are trying to sell the idea that they're fighting to save jobs. What they're doing is cutting off their nose to spite their face.

This is the current reality: You can not continue as you have in the past. You claim that it has worked, but all it has done was ride the unusually long (and steep) climb of the markets as it's sole lifeline. The model has failed and is clearly unsustainable. You must bend, or you will be broken.


dan
said
0 0

I see from the comments already posted people put the blame where it does not belong. Did the Union and the workers make all the wrong decisions or did management? Is Fiat insisting that management give up anything? I doubt it. No matter what cuts the Union agrees to, the price of cars will not go down. The rich will keep getting richer and ALL Union and non Union employees everywhere will make less and less.

This is just what big business wants. They want everyone blaming everyone else for the situation they the BIG BUSINESS’ put us in. Blame Union workers and blame your neighbours. The more we blame each other the more BIG BUSINESS makes and the more we lose. Look at each other and see how we can all get together and help each other, not fight each other. Please.


Homer J
said
0 0

The comments are the same for the CAW. Would you rather have less money being paid by your members or no money at all when the plants are closed. In this economy that is a very easy decision to make.
I feel for the auto workers themselves, as they all work hard to make a great life for themselves and their family’s and unfortunately it looks like they will all be heading to the UI line behind thousands and thousands of other people all looking to fill the same jobs, which are not there any more.
What a devastating situation this has become.




Matt
said
0 0

The greedy private sector union is becoming a thing of the past.
If the union is unreasonable and demands too much, economics will solve the problem.

Now we're left with the government unions, they'll just raise taxes and bankrupt us before they let go.


unfair
said
0 0

Why is it some people hate Unions so much? I know someone who was told he could only go to the bathroom at certain times and could only take off and put on his gloves and hat at certain times. he was also told he wasted 0.5 seconds while approaching a customer. Without a Union, he would be unable to fight such petty unbelievable things.


Red X
said
0 0

Fiat and Chrysler should go bankrupt so their EU and American competitors could fill in the patriotic void.

Roger, the People's Republic of China has been making and selling more cars in the past 3 months and the trending will continue as that economy expands. The Chinese will have to carry the debt of countries printing money like the U$ & Canada?!

Will protesters try to snuff out the Olympic flame for the way Canada treats it's indigenous people OR environment?


LS
said
0 0

Roger T:
How does this relate to our PM not attending the Olympics in Bejing? The Chinese economy is hurting too and their Human Rights record is abysmal. Too many governments and businesses suck up because they are moral cowards.
Maybe it's time the government's in North America demand open access to foreign car markets. No cookie no dumpee here.


Bill Moyer Portage la Prairie
said
0 0

Why is Fiat even interested in Chrysler? It is like tying your lifeboat to the side of the Titanic. The Titanic may be large and shiny, but.....




Lee
said
0 0

Canadians need to wake up before this disgusting lewenza, and his union thugs,
'negotiate' the demise of thousands and thousands of jobs which will affect us all in a terribly terribly negative way.


JP
said
0 0

CAW just keeps holding out that "attitude of entitlement". Keep it up CAW, while the place drys right up and you are left with nothing, nothing, nothing! You get what you create!



Joe C
said
0 0

I guess this makes Chrysler's bankruptcy official, then.

Shame.


Ted
said
0 0

Too late for any break through at this point. CAW is dug in and not facing reality.

Best to get it over with and see what rises from the ashes.


The Widowmaker
said
0 0

The CAW would rather lose all Chrysler then sacrifice a portion of their salary. Why give up part when you can just give it all up. Kill the union. It's dead. It's gone the way of the dinosaur.


Denis
said
0 0

Assembly workers are just 7 percent of costs. What about the others in the supply chain?


Rob NS
said
0 0

The Federal Goverment should step in, and dismantle the CAW. This union is going to do more damage than good, to the everyday auto worker and to the Canadian economy. They have milked the consumers way to long, then ask us to bail them out with our tax dollars!
Without putting a dent in their own stuffed wallets. I think not, I'll buy an Fiat made in the US, no problem.
We do not forget the price gouge when the Canadian dollar was higher than the US, yet we still had to pay about 20% more for the same car! Where did the billions go from that gouge? Simple math, we can figure it out.
Sink or swim, Fiat may bail you out, but I certainly would not.


Stéphane
said
0 0

Plain and simple, I think this dispute will either end in 2 options, either CAW will finally cave and meet the demands, or cause most or if not all auto plants to move to outsourcing. It's going to be a real problem and like most greedy unions they might just end up not wanting to budge. And speaking as a former member of a union called UFCW, a union for food and commercial workers, starting off you don't get anywhere they care more about those who have been there for a longer period of time. Which is great for them but not for the younger adults or teenagers getting out into the working world. Unions are not the solution, controlled capitalism is. It's not socialist and it's not entirely capitalist. It's more of a mix of both. If we were to practice this method this economic situation would smooth over very well.


Cherie
said
0 0

So sorry, but a lot of us remember years and years of CAW and other unions holding the public and their employers hostage because they were whining and carrying on and striking for higher wages, more benefits, better pension plans, etc etc etc, while the rest of non-unioners got nothing (except higher prices to pay for the unions' demands). This bubble has exploded, and, yes, it is the fault of the unions. They demanded more and more and more until the employers couldn't keep up with the payouts, now we're all supposed to share in their grief - not on your life.


Dean
said
0 0

I hope Fiat doesn't come to the rescue of Chrysler. The CAW needs to give its head a big shake. Accept much lower, but still higher than most, wages and keep your jobs, or, bye bye. How is it possible that their collective heads could be so far up their alimentary canals? A decent job for a decent wage is not unreasonable. This goes for the alleged management as well. It is quite obvious that they aren't in touch with reality either. What's up with the lousy quality and even worse "styles" of your vehicles? Make something at a reasonable price and quality level and people will buy it. Then, you all can keep your jobs because you will have earned them. Unless this happens, forget it. None of you even come close!


ik
said
0 0

In reality the union heads are trying to save their high paying wages. They really don't care about the guy on the line.


Bill white
said
0 0

Sunny - check the math again.... that is 0 hours at $45.00 per hour or 40 hours @ $25.00.
hm m m m makes one think doesn't it ?


My 2 Cents
said
0 0

Why does the only argument for the CAW seem to be that it is management's fault? Does anyone really care whose fault it is at this point? Regardless of how they got to this point, the reality is just what it is. The union will have to suck it up and accept it or go on EI while chanting "it's not our fault". Who cares? Grow up already! The economy sucks for everyone and that is just a fact. Get over it! Hope for a global recovery but plan for a further slowdown.


Dave
said
0 0

The CAW has sucked the life out of the companies they work for and now they are trying do the same to us - the tax payers. I say shut em down. I wish them the best of luck trying to find a job that pays even half of what they currently make.


wayne
said
0 0

To rob In Winnipeg--4 years in University and only makeing 33hr,You sure wasted your time going to University didnt you!!!But i bet you could not handle one week in the auto industry,


Canadian living in the US
said
0 0

$76/hour? Is it a misprint?
Assume a 40hour week, that would be $150K / year??


If this is indeed what they are making in Chrysler's assembly line, it is insane.


Scene
said
0 0

As usual Roger T says something dumb! Always good to hear those comments of yours, at least they are someting to smirk at! Your still bringing up the Harper/ Olympic thing, hahaha!

As for the CAW situation, good luck to them and their dream world. Soon they are going to be living a night mare if they don't meet Fiat's demands. Lewenza get your act together, this is one battle your going to lose!


Andy Y - Vancouver
said
0 0

It's unfortunate that the Chrysler brand could disappear because the CAW is as greedy as the executives who got the company into the mess to begin with.

Oh well if the company goes under the CAW will certainly be in the market for a new president...

I tend to agree that in the real world, $47/hr is a huge wage anywhere in the country, including Ontario...


Cambob
said
0 0

"CAW head Ken Lewenza has said repeatedly that Chrysler's problems run deeper than the wages of the company's unionized workers and that it should look at other solutions to restructure the company effectively."


Um... Is this guy the president of Chrysler, or a least a majority shareholder?


DJ
said
0 0

First off there are 2 mistakes that keep being made by the car companies. They for many years have had to give in to the threats of the CAW/UAW and in the end all they have accomplished is to waste money and productivity by having a strike.


Management for too many years has just given in because well they were making money and would make more with more sales. The problem is now people can’t buy cars and as a result car companies aren’t selling anything to pay the workers. The CBA’s that are in place force the car companies pretty much to pay the workers to stay home or pay them to be at work. What would you do? If I had to pay you anyway I may as well bring you in.


Second the unions keep going for more and more when they did not have any right to do so. Just because a company makes money does not give you any right to it. Your workers are getting fair return for the work they are being asked to complete.


What is needed are the car companies and the unions to work together. Imagine that! All they need to do is come to an agreement that right now during the lean times they will accept lower wages and in return when things start to turn around they will start to give back to the members.


I used to work in a manufacturing plant. We had the CAW and they would not allow any concessions and would not negotiate any reduction in wages. Those jobs all disappeared.


In the end the company will be able to survive and if the new synergy gets into a place they can start to return some of the pay back to the workers.


The sense of entitlement needs to stop. Just because a company makes a profit does not mean that you the worker deserves a raise. Do you make a decent living for the area you work? Is it a reasonable standard of living? Then call it a day! Your company is allowed to make money and intern you get some job stability.



Tim Kroeker
said
0 0

I went to the Fiat site and downloaded their 2008 report. I also downloaded the reports of Ford and GM (Chrysler is a private company and does not release financial data). As it turns out, Fiat CEO Marchionne in 2008 earned approximately US$4,444,180. By comparison, Forbes pegged Ford CEO Alan Mulally at around US$2 million; former GM CEO Rick Wagoner earned about US$2 million.


Fiat wants Chrysler employees to drop about 40 percent of their earnings (salary and benefits combined). I wonder if Mr. Marchionne has calculated what 40 percent of his earnings would be and that under his demands he would be dropping about US$2,689,898.43 from his annual pay cheque.


I think it is amusing that Fiat, a company that has a long history of financial crisis and poor performing vehicles, whose CEO has a salary higher than the combined CEO salaries of GM and Ford, says that Chrysler workers make too much money.


Perhaps before he starts throwing stones Mr. Marchionne should check the sealant around the windows of his glass house.



union MUST change to adapt
said
0 0

well 'Dan",,I guess you skipped right to the comments section with out reading the story. Fiat said it was the CAW, not the UAW that is making thing difficult for the merger....the CAW which I assume you are a part of, because only fellow union members use the management line to blame whole heartly instead of including your union AND bad management in the debacle that is the North American car industry.

I cannot understand why the "brothers and sisters" do not take a good size pay cut to save their jobs NOW, then ask for more when things turn around. Kenny and the gang could look like they were the ones that saved the industry and use that leverage for bargining down the road...I guess Kenny is from the old school of unions...demand, demand, demand...then target and threats.


Sunny in Sudbury
said
0 0

Hey unfair.

The unions were instrumental for workplace safety and the minimization of nepetism. However, the pendulum has swung too far the other way.

Greed has got the best of them, look at the $5,000,000.00 retreat the CAW has in Port Elgin, Ontario, not necessary. How much is Lewenza'a salary?
There has to be balance in salaries, quality of goods, company expectations and market conditions. This applies to all on the employment chain. There are several companies in Ontario that provide a quality product, excellent work environment and life balance. One company is Campbell Soup. They must be doing something right.


Steve the Pundit
said
0 0

Hey, Ken Lewenza: Way to not see the forest for the trees!


Do you REALLY think that, by digging in your heels you're going to save all these union jobs (including yours)?


The writing is on the wall; all governments in US and Canada have said "Make a deal with Fiat before the end of the month or you're DONE!" The providers of the current lifeline are on record as saying "current wage concessions are not enough."


I know you THINK you're showing yourself to be a strong leader, that you THINK you are protecting union jobs, and that you THINK you are "in the right". But THINK about this: Do you and your members want to be IN THE RIGHT, or EMPLOYED? Because it sure looks like you can't have both.


Do the right thing Ken; go back to the table and work day and night with management to try and save this company and your union brothers from the unemployment line.


Bob London
said
0 0

Put up or shut up. If buzz doesn't like the deal, CAW pension should buy it.


L.C.
said
0 0

A few things are clear-these folks responding don't work for the auto industry.
my husband has worked for Chrysler for 25+ years.HE DOES NOT MAKE $70.00 PER HOUR! He makes the same as any Toyota worker which is $33.00/hour give or take a buck.He pays enough taxes on that salary supporting programs run by this government that he does not benefit from(welfare, child bonuses, social assistance for newcomers,etc.)Why does our government spend billions of our tax $$ of Afghanistan trying to fix something that seems a waste of time.In Canada, we don't stone women protestors, legalize rape or ban them from school yet taxpayers believe supporting this country in a war is not to be questioned, yet investing in jobs in our own country is just simply a waste of taxpayer money?Who are auto industry analists to question the integrity of auto workers -- they probably don't even get their hands dirty at any given time.They don't work that assembly line in 120 degree weather, they are not declined to use washroom facilities when they need to go, they do not get fired if they have an emergency at home or a child is sick and they can't make it to work. How dare any of these people commenting say that these workers don't earn or deserve their $33.00/hour as Toyota workers get. As for pensions, I'd gladly take a 50% cut of what Rick Wagner got. As for the CAW or any union, there is a reason for their existence. What would minimum wage really be in this province? Who lives on minimum wage anyway?The big question isFiat is stating that they will close plants but don't have the balls to say which ones. Why would any of these workers cut their own throats?


jake
said
0 0

We Autoworkers have pride. No way we are going to work for $55/hour. That is slave wage. We rather starve than give in to the Auto indrustries.


John from TO
said
0 0

To rob In Winnipeg

They make about 35 an hour. The rest is benifits and pension. So they make 2 bucks an hour more than you do and didnt have to go to university. if you have a big benifit package like they do, then your probably making almost 75 bucks an hour as well.


LC, Brampton
said
0 0

Ok, can some of you EINSTEINS get your facts correct, then do the math?
My husband is employed by Chrysler for 25+ years.
Paycheck - $33.00/hour (Less a large portion to Mr. Harper and his thugs)and same as my niece who works for Toyota at $33.00 /hour.
so...
$33.00 - $20.00/hour required cut = $13.00 per hour. hmm. almost minimum wage.....that's gonna make our economy spin - I think I'll go out and buy a top of the line Lincoln or give my financial advisor an increase in his pay!
c'mon can the media PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE publish a workers paystament to shut these nominds up.


Fed up of whinning in Alberta
said
0 0

The dollar amounts they are talking about include their benifit packages! Simple things like sick days, vaction days, family days, personal day, volunteer day, medical, dental, optical, prescription assistance, employment training courses, health and safety courses, ect. ect. ect. Hopefully some of you get the point.


Buck- Niagara
said
0 0

Let's make one thing clear. Caw workers make as much per hour as the transplants here in Canada. It is the legacy costs that are the problem,along with the unfair trade practises that our governments have let creep into our country. The transpalnts have not been here long enough to have pensioners and entail those costs. It was OUR gov't that said the auto makers were CANNOT FAIL companies and did not have to keep thier pension programs funded. It is the transplant gov't that subsidize every auto sold in North America to the tune of $1500 per vechile. What does Our gov"t contribute to our mamufactures to be competitive? Where are the trade tarriffs? I am a pensioner from an auto company who played by all the rules laid out before me for over 30 yrs. Now they want to take it all away from us to so we can come down to a foreign company's way of doing business. Once they suceed in doing this to the auto sector it will be some other business that gets targeted. It's time we as workers,union or non-union stood up and demanded a stop to having to come down to others levels and demand they come up to ours!


Jim in Edmonton
said
0 0

The CAW are making products that are in decline, they are overpriced and their market share is decreasing! Their competitors are making better products at better prices!I could see the Canadian government bailing them out if there was hope at the end of the rainbow but the fact is most folks had their doubts about GM and Chrysler and now we know they are shakey at best. Once the smoke clears, who is buying these cars? The CAW can play hard ball all they want, they need a partner to do it and more and more the Canadian taxpayer is growing weary to continue financial support - certainly the Canadian comsumer has already voted and unless the CAW is willing to substantially reduce their demands, they will fold.


Steve in Ottawa
said
0 0

Why don't the CAW and management get together and agree to across the board cuts to save the company and then agree on how to ramp up again if they are successful? CAW rates would go from $76 and hour to the "required" $47 an hour. That is 61.8% of their previous salary. Management salaried workers could also agree to a cut so they take 61.8% of their salary or, alternately, they could agree to the salary levels the foreign companies pay. Then, if profits start flowing again, 40% of the profits the company makes would go to all workers, management and unionized staff, on a pro-rata basis. 20% would go to a fund for retirees to support their pensions and the other 40% would be re-invested in the company. If the CAW and Chrysler management do not get some positive thinking going and stop shooting bullets at each other, a lot of people, particularly parts suppliers and dealership employees, will be hurt. There is a real possibility to avert a disaster here but Lewenza and LaSorda have to get off their egos and come up with a joint solution that is of benefit to everyone. It can be done.


nancy
said
0 0

Please We in Canada do not want to lose our Auto industry. It is simple the companies cannot afford to pay the high wages and benefits to the workers and keep going. The CAW needs to do what ever is necessary to save the jobs and if that means giving up 19 dollars worth of wages and benefits then do it. My husband was given a choice to work for 3 days a week or be laid off and he didn't even blink. Stop thinking you are better than the rest of us and do what needs to be done or there will be no one else to blame but yourselves. And to all the narrow minded people who make comments about that the auto workers are un educated and un deserving get real. These people got jobs that most of us are jealous of but to belittle them is wrong and education has nothing to do with it. It just comes down to simple math if no one is buying the cars you can't afford to make the cars.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

HEAVEN FORBID!

"The cut would whittle their wages down to $55 an hour - the rate Toyota and Honda workers make in the U.S."
_______________

My goodness! What's an uneducated, “overpaid” assembly-line worker to do (along with any family or friends they foolishly encouraged to board the gravy train)?!

Yes. Yes. Yes. I know, it's true, the executive management at the "Big Three" are principally responsible for the demise of the North American auto industry; not the unions. I agree.

However, our economy cannot continue to be expected to thrive on the back of "old-school" industries that over-value UNSKILLED labor. Those days are over. Developing nations are taking most of the pie.

Collectively, we need to wake up and realize that it's not 1980.

The UAW/CAW best be careful not to "fight" its way into immediate extinction.


Roger T
said
0 0

jake
We Autoworkers have pride. No way we are going to work for $55/hour. That is slave wage. We rather starve than give in to the Auto indrustries....

Stupidity sometimes overrides common sense or wit. When you and your family lose your home and on the verge of living on the streets, perhaps you can beg for a job from GM, I mean Fiat!



Miramichi Kid
said
0 0

Yehaw, down with the UNIONS!!! Seems like everyone commenting feels the same disgust for Lewenza and his ne'er-do-well union thugs. Lewenza, can you say, would you like fries with that? :-)


Lee
said
0 0

dan & unfair, unions do not create jobs they are merely leeches sucking the worker's blood. Ask yourselves, 'how much does Lewenza get paid?' You hate CEO;s etc. but your union thugs, sorry leaders, do not disclose their pay levels or what sacrifices they are making, wise up guys.


D.K.
said
0 0

To LC wifw of Chrysler worker:

No one is wanting to lower the 33 to 35 dollars an hour your hubby makes. What we object to are the SPA days, free legal service if he decides to divorce you , free pension plan. Those are some of the cost that inflates the hourly wages and benefits to 75 bucks per hour.


Dave
said
0 0

If the Chrysler Union wants the same Wages as GM then they can go Bankrupt along with GM and NO BAILOUT money . FIAT is tring to save there job's and they want to play games while Foriegn Country's take over the Car Market . I guess they have never been in this sutuation before .



Don
said
0 0

The caw does not want to reduce their wages, benefits, etc, to what Toyota and Honda are paying their workers in Canada for one simple reason. Toyota and Honda workers are not unionized. It would look bad on the caw if their workers did not make more than their non union competitors. I recommend that all caw workers de certify the caw, and save your jobs. The caw will see you all go on unemployment before they will give in.


Bruce
said
0 0

OK lets do some math here. Currently they make $55+$19=$74/hr

Now for a 40 hrs work week
$74 x 40hr/wk = $2960 per week.

$2960/wk X 52wk/yr = $153 920 gross

Your telling me that someone working the line screwing in bolts and other pre fab auto parts without a highschool diploma can make more than a doctor with 9+ years of post secondary education!!!

Thats got to be the worlds craziest deal, I mean the CAW must have had incriminating evidence against the automakers in order to get that kind of salary.

No wonder their cars cost so much and fall apart in no time. The company (obviously) can't make a good car charge a reasonable price for it and pay its employees at the same time.

Honestly even with the pay cut to $55/hr they will still get $114 000 gross salary per year! THATS STILL WAY TOO MUCH!!

Honestly the salary should be no higher than $55 000 per year ($26/hr) AND THAT'S MORE THAN GENEROUS!! Do they realise how many Canadians(just as hard working or even harder working) with the same (and a lot of times) or MORE education make a lot less than they do. They need a reality check and if the North American automakers go under, then the employees will have more than their fair share for causing it.


Honestly this is an insane salary! I only wish I could make that much, and I have a university degree that I paid for by myself working a low paying job going to university and working hard through high school. Maybe I should have left school during grade 9 with the "cool" kids and worked for one of the big 3.


kate
said
0 0

As expected the talking head Ken refuses wage concessions. Let's see, company on the verge of bankruptcy, thousands of workers barely qualified to work at Wal Mart...yes let's lose our jobs holding out for the big bucks!! Friend of mine lost his job, his pension for life for the same reason. Refused to take a wage cut, company shut down and is moving to Mexico. He's 50 years old and only has high school and guess what? He can't find any job, never mind a minimum wage job. He laughed at me when I went back to school at 40 to reskill...seriously, these guys have no clue what's it like in the real world for the rest of us. Welcome to reality boys!


Dave
said
0 0

For all of you who said the unions were not the problems. Here is the proof now deal with real job rates.


dan
said
0 0

RE: union MUST change to adapt

I stand by my comments and no I do not work for any of the BIG 3. Yes I did read the article and where does it say management should take more of a cut as well? Did you read Tim Kroeker’s comment? Perhaps if he CEO’s would start taking life altering pay cuts then I might agree to the CAW doing so as well.

When do we take a stand and protect that what the companies agreed to in a legally binding contract? It’s funny how everyone says the Unions have to agree to concessions despite having contracts but when BIG BUSINESS is told to do so they claim they can’t due ot their legally binding contract.


Matt in Calgary
said
0 0

The CAW is a perfect example of the problems of large unions. They use the legal threat of strike every 2 or 3 years as leverage in order to get more benefits, money, time off,...etc. from the company. The end result is a company (i.e. Chrysler) which is bloated and uncompetitive.

A responsible union is one which is concerned with not only its members but also the common good.

The powers of unions (i.e. CAW, Teachers Union,Nurses Union,...etc.) need to be curtailed significantly.


RE: Sunny in Sudbury
said
0 0

RE: Sunny in Sudbury

I never said Unions were perfect. I was simply pointing out how some managers treat employees incorrectly and if this guy did not have a Union he would not even be able to fight back. Do you think it is right that a manager can control when a person drinks or goes to the washroom?


Terry, Drayton ON
said
0 0

$55.00 dollars an hour is still obscene.

I wish you all could hear the laughs around here, "$55.00 an hour! Where the heck do I sign!".

When is the CAW, and unions in general, going to realize they have "striked" themselves out of existence and their back stabbing and black mailing ways are a leading cause of death for their employers. These greedy folk have killed the geese that laid their golden eggs. And they have no one to blame but themselves.

Bailouts with government money, taxed from people who don't earn even close to half of what these autoworkers do, and then back stop their warranties with even more tax dollars besides!

Tax the poor to feed the overpaid autoworkers! Where the hell does this madness end?

Both Chrysler and GM can rest assured that I will never buy any of their products again. Never again. I will also encourage anyone who asks me to do the same. Nothing but a pack of greedy, spoiled, corporate welfare bums are all Chysler and GM are at this point. Same goes for the CAW.

Don't forget that despite the current economic problems both Chyrsler and GM have been dying a slow death for a long time. The bottom line is they can't sell their cars because nobody wants to buy them anymore.

Let 'em croak. In the long run it will be the best thing for the Canadian manufacturing industry.


RE: union MUST change to adapt
said
0 0

RE: union MUST change to adapt

I stand by my comments and no I do not work for any of the BIG 3. Yes I did read the article and where does it say management should take more of a cut as well? Did you read Tim Kroeker’s comment? Perhaps if he CEO’s would start taking life altering pay cuts then I might agree to the CAW doing so as well.

When do we take a stand and protect that what the companies agreed to in a legally binding contract? It’s funny how everyone says the Unions have to agree to concessions despite having contracts but when BIG BUSINESS is told to do so they claim they can’t due ot their legally binding contract.


Matt in Calgary
said
0 0

To those autoworkers (and spouses of autoworkers) who continue to claim that they don't make $70+ an hour....here's how it works. Pay attention..

If you factor in:
1) hourly wage
2) time off
3) medical and dental benefits
4) pension
5) maternity leave

The cumulative cost of the above is....you got it.... $70+ an hour. Another way of looking at is this. For me to have the same standard of living (based on take home pay), have the same medical/dental benefits, have six weeks of vacation a year and retire with a fat pension at 55......I would need to be paid $70+ an hour over the course of my 35 years of employment.

Very simple.


DW in Vancouver
said
0 0

The board members of the CAW do not truly care about their members, after all they are still having their salaries paid even if their members are out on strike.
That is why unions are no longer of any use to any one but the executive board.



Jon in Burl.
said
0 0

Once again Mr. Lewenzia has head up his butt. 75% of somehting is better than 100% of nothing.
Fiat ia absolutely right in its demands of Chrysler.
I wonder what Mr Lewenzia makes a year? I wonder what happened to all the union dues that have been paid over the years?
It kills me to say it Mr. McGuinty is right in not meeting there pension wishes. These workers didn't contribute dime one and I see no reason to bail out them out. Welcome to my world people of the CAW. I have no pension, with the exception of my RRSP's and that took a 35% hit...No Bail Out for me either.


Chris in Toronto
said
0 0

After reading the article and some of the comments here, I looked on the CAW's website and could not find financial disclosure of this organisation. I find it hard to listen to their arguements about management wages at the car companies when there is not disclosure on the CAW's mgmt wages including Ken Lewenza and others in their upper management.


Terry - Drayton ON
said
0 0

Now let me see, just how does that bumper sticker go again? Oh yea, I remember, it says:

"Out of a job yet? Keep buying foreign."

Now how about this one, as an updated replacement:

"Out of a job yet? Keep voting union."


Ryan In Calgary
said
0 0

@Jake
I'll take your slave wage any day then. Maybe I'll drop some McDonald's by your feet while you starve, unless you're too proud for that.


incredulous in B.C.
said
0 0

We have soldiers in Afganistan who would love to be making $76 an hour to put their lives on the line...$76 an hour to turn out a sub-standard product is outrageous!


Unemployed non-union hardworker needing job
said
0 0

Unions must go! "In a globally competitive marketplace, the seniority-based business practices which supported growth in the past, are not the solution for the future." It's time for change.


Paul in Ajax
said
0 0

In the most recent round of concession negotiations, the CAW had agreed to $19 per hour in concessions, or roughly 26%. That's pretty significant. By contrast management agreed to give themselves a 10% pay reduction, and the bondholders refused to give up anything.

So please guys, if you want to lay blame, try and get the right guys. And hey, anybody here aware that Chrysler is supposed to give out millions more in retention bonuses in August?


Rob
said
0 0

Hey Wayne, whats going to happen if you lose your jobs. At least the guy with four years of university will have an easier chance of getting hired. Or is your union going to pay your bills when the plants close!



Gord
said
0 0

I grew up in a union house in Northern Ontario and as a little kid I saw the good a union brought to our town and the dignity it gave my Dad, the sole breadwinner in our family. Good wages, medical benefits [before OHIP]pensions and considerate treatment.

Over time however,the union there grew out of control just like the CAW appears to be doing and the mine closed and everyone lost their jobs and house prices in our one employer town went into the toilet. Much like what's happening in Windsor now.
Unions were never meant to drive the employer out of town or out of Canada.
If the CAW persists, Chrysler will simply withdraw from Canada, manufacture in the U.S under the two wage tier system in line with Toyota and Honda costs and export to Canada. And tough guy Ken Lewenza will face the wrath of dazed and unemployed former Chrysler workers once they wake up to the consequences of their union's hari kari tactics has led to all of their woe. I also predict Windsor will become an pariah among companies wishing to expand in Ontario and Canada. Who would want to invest and start up a business in Windsor with such tough guy unions around that will stop at nothing to get their way. And with so many other hungry towns with reasonable unions looking for industries to start up there.
On the other hand I see a bright spot and opportunity. Windsor as the next Elliot Lake retirement mecca perhaps, with rock bottom real estate prices, with no summer blackflies and mesquitoes and mild winters?



Andy Y - Vancouver
said
0 0

@L.C.

Your husband may be paid $33/hr (still quite high for a manufacturing job) however what you are not seeing is that all the "free" benefits he has, make up the remaining $43/hr. That is what Fiat sees. If it were just about his hourly rate there wouldn't be a problem, except it isn't.

Since each employee gets the same benefits, the cost of those benefits per employee are the same. It is commonly known as a "shop rate".

As for the Fiat CEO's salary, well that may include the stock options he gets as well as some sort of bonus for keeping the company solvent during the crisis, unlike 2 of the big 3 automakers.

Now I said earlier Chrysler may fall. Actually, in reality Chrysler Canada may fall. The company may just as well close the Canadian plants and move everything down South. The Yankees would welcome the jobs. This would kill them as a Canadian brand, but hey they have a market 10 times our size to concentrate on, so they probably won't loose that much in the long run...

The reality of big business. Unions can't keep a business' doors open, only close them with short sighted thinking.


Josepf
said
0 0

I guess goverment officials, at all levels, should lead by example. All those 'Phat-Cats" with there pension and expense accounts, flying around the world on flimsy 'official'excuses, they also should take cut backs, why should only the working class do it??


Doug
said
0 0

I agree with JP.

Unions still think that they are entitled to their entitlements.

For their families sake, I hope they take less money and keep their jobs.

If they want to remain "entitled" it will cost them a lot more money to go back to school to become a teacher!!!


Not a high paid work in Mississauga
said
0 0

This makes me ILL...I have worked for the same company for many years, I went from $15.00 per hour to $18.00 and now back to $15.00 plus 1 day off with no pay....I did this so I could keep my job...it's called Comprise.


JC in Ottawa
said
0 0

My sister just bought a new BMW and my brother-in-law a new Mazda 3. We're either going with Toyota or Mazda
Problem is NOT CAW, but the awful cars GM/Chrysler/Ford offers (I buy a new N.A. car every 2 years, and each was a piece of junk. No more American cars for me)


Steve the Pundit
said
0 0

I sure hope "jake" was joking; because if he wasn't, and his "opinion" is representative of his union brothers, these companies can't disappear fast enough!

As for "L.C.": I'm sorry your husband "only" earns $33 / hour (give or take a buck). That translates to $68,640 / year (give or take a few bucks) just in wages. I would assume overtime (when the plants are running it) and shift premium is over and above?

Factor in the following:
- automatic Cost of Living Adjustment
- 3 weeks minimum paid vacation
- medical benefits with minimal co-pay
- dental
- pension plan
- education reimbursement
- etc.

Conservatively, that's got to be worth between $75 and $80k a year for what is, basically, unskilled labor. I know a lot of university grads with complex degrees that are earning nowhere near that.

Yes L.C., your husband occasionally works in 120 degree heat. I'll bet a lot of others would work for way less, even in those conditions.

And if you mean to tell me that the CAW wouldn't immediately jump to the defense of any worker who was fired for the reasons you cite...then why is the union taking a piece of worker earnings as dues?

Sorry, I'm not at all sympathetic.


Looking for a job
said
0 0

To LC, Brampton:

I'll be happy working at Chrysler or any other auto plant for $13/hr or even minimum wage if they would hire me just to assemble parts. I guess if I know some senior union friends inside, I could get $33/hr. Can your husband refer me? I don't think I need to be an Einstein, right?


A.H. Kingston
said
0 0

It is all the EXTRAS that is bringing it up to $70 plus an hr. I work for $28.00 an hr with no benefits and I am doing OK.


Steve
said
0 0

Even though the autoworkers aren't to blame for this mess, they're the ones that will bite the bullet.

Lewenza should be FIRED for even thinking about sacrificing all those jobs (and livelihoods!) for being such a stubborn a$$!


WestofTheRockies
said
0 0

To Dan, Unfair & Denis and all the rest of you in the Labour is only 7 percent club, and/or those blaming management.

Who cares!...... It's too late. Wake up! The ship is going down & it doesn’t matter how the deck chairs were arranged yesterday. Save yourselves….. jump into the Fiat lifeboat before it sails away!!!

Either you give in and have job or you don't and you are outa work. Pretty simple but I must concede a bit too complicated for empty barrels like your true leader Buzz and his mouthpiece Kenny.

If I was P.M. I would up the ante. You don't accept wage cutbacks you don't get E.I.! Why should the rest of working Canadians be forced to pay for your stupid decisions?



Sean Calder - Chatham ON
said
0 0

LC, the cuts don't only have to be in take-home pay, but can also be in the "All-in" portion.

Give up some benefits. Give up some perks. Give up some stuff that you don't really use or need. That can go a LONG way towards that $20 figure.


CAW - Get real or get lost !
said
0 0

Fiat doesnt like CAW rates, Chrysler doesnt like CAW rates, the public doesnt like CAW rates, the government doesnt like CAW rates....


...see a pattern here CAW workers? The posh uber high wage days are behind you.

Either get real or get lost!


Moncton Fella
said
0 0

The simple solution to this problem is to have a decertification vote.

Let the CAW present numbers and Chrysler present theirs and then have a 3rd party oversee a secret ballot vote.

If the CAW is out of touch with the workers, then the workers can decertify the union and accept Chrysler's offer.

OTOH, if they feel the union is representing them adequately, the vote will fail and the CAW can continue to take the lead in negotiating for the workers.

It's very simple and more productive than the union, government and automaker bashing that seems to be filling this thread.


Rick in NS
said
0 0

I would be very curious to find out what the "real" wage of a plantworker is. The article says 75$/hr cut down to 55$/hr or 116K per yr but I can't find anything that says what the actual salary for the majority of the workers are. Why doesn't somebody post what the salaries are across the board (from new hire and up) and give us all a better understanding of the situation. I would love to be paid 116K to build cars instead of 60K to risk my life in Afghanistan!!!


GP
said
0 0

@ LC, Brampton

They are talking about total cost of the employee, not-just the hourly wage.

FYI, $33/hr is a completely ridiculous wage for unskilled labour... getting mad won't change that. I suggest you brace yourself for reality.


Brandy Howard
said
0 0

CAW workers should be more than happy to receive $20 an hr,benefits included.
If they wanted to make more money and have kids,they should have thought of obtaining an education.
What did you expect to make with nothing but grade 12?
Many others without an education make minimum wage.
It doesn't take a genius to do this work.It's tedious,I'm sure,that's why you should make more than minimum wage,but definitely not over $70 an hr,with benefits in.
$20 an hr.sounds fair.


Darth Vader
said
0 0

Why doesn't Fiat wait until Chrysler actually goes bankrupt and then swoop into pick at the carcass, that way they would have no CAW to deal with period. If they don't get rid of the CAW, and through some miracle the CAW actually give back $19/hr, as soon as there is a glimpse of recovery the CAW will try and strike right back to where they were plus lost time. The concessions are not enough, the CAW must be purged entirely.


Aaron in Brampton
said
0 0

Its Actually good news for the Industry ,Follow the examples:
Consumers Distributors went bust no big deal
Miracle Mart / Pascals / Eatons / Byway / Simpsons and too many more to name...No Big Deal. Just today Conquest Vacations closed its doors after 37 years.

As the economy shrinks the weak players just Die Off and the leaner and stronger survive to continue.

If Chrysler cant make it there are 25 Car companies around the world that will Rush in to fill the void WITHOUT using our Tax dollars. They will buy the factories ; hire workers at reasonable non union rates and provide us with great cars.

Same goes for GM.
Actually it seems like the Chinese Car companies are eyeing and positioning themselves to pick up the pieces when it all goes down.





Rob
said
0 0

Why is ANY auto worker making $33/hr?
Did you have to go to University to learn how to push a button on a machine designed by an Engineer who had to go to school?
Did they have to learn a trade at all to learn which button to push?
I'm not saying that all autoworkers are mindless automations, but the value of work that is being done is based on legacy work and inflation.
No wonder a car costs so much, never mind that there is so much markup involved in the materials.
Get a grip, you're doing a $15/hr a job for 2.5x the rate plus benefits you don't deserve. Being part of a union shouldn't give you entitlements equivalent to people that EARNED their place by getting a higher education!


tony scheller
said
0 0

Pride might not taste very well when you have to swallow it,but it won't kill you like bankrupcy will.Clearly something is better than nothing and if I were a worker in management or on the line I would do whatever it took to find a solution.By reviewing all comments here it's evident that the majority of Canadians have had enough of the C.A.W.
Tony.


Alex (Toronto)
said
0 0

I wonder how many of these union-bashers have agreed to a $14,000 per year salary cut to save their own jobs, like the CAW has agreed to this year.


John in London
said
0 0

"I am an auto worker, and Auto workers have pride. No way we are taking a $20 pay cut to work for only $55/hour. That is slave wage. We will never give in to the auto industry"

..... couldn't have said it better myself. The sad thing is ... these are the real attitudes of these auto workers.

And they wouldnt even have to take any pay cut at all ... they could chop $20/hour out of their benefits and would still have better benefits and pensions than most people in the country (excluding the unions like CUPE that suckle at the public teet).


Dave Ont East
said
0 0

Lewenza was elected President to best represent his Union workers. Unfortunately, his craving for "power" has gone too far. He must bite the bullet and HELP the company that supported him and all CAW workers for so many years.In tough times you take what you can get..no time for bargaining..If I was a CAW Union worker I'd organize an emergency meeting immediately with all CAW workers and vote this jerk out of power!!! Your jobs are too vital..so you will end up with $40 an hr, but your income taxes deducted will be that much less, it will put you in a lower tax bracket so less income to pay at year end and you will have saved your company that put food on the table for all these years. No barganing, no negotiating..if you let Lewenza bargain for you, you can count on EI which is 55% of wages and that will run out...Time to put this guy out of his misery.Its your choice CAW..either let this person negotiate (can tell you he wont get far at all) or accept and help your company.....


Gord
said
0 0

It's so sad to see the CAW leadership pigheadedness lead to the demise of Chrysler in Canada, a fine employer and corporate citizen of some 85 years. But I'm also so tired of my tax money going to Chrysler just to meet payroll. Our governments have many places to spend our money to strengthen our magnificent Canada and a failing section of our auto industry ain't one of them


DaveEast
said
0 0

The wackos who run the CAW cannot be reasoned with, period. That the workers are firmly mesmerized by these clowns is astounding. If you talk to auto workers they believe all of the dumb crap the union leadership is shovelling at them. Too late they are going to learn that it was the AUTO COMPANIES, not the union, that paid their wages.

Each and every auto worker DESERVES the fate that awaits him or her, for not finally throwing off their shackles and liberating themselves from these anti-job, economy killing demagogues. The CAW needs to be decertified. Nothing less will stop these idealogues from totally destroying the auto sector.


Shawn
said
0 0

I find the defending of the CAW amusing. We all agree their pay has put GM and Chrysler at a competitive disadvantage. So if you like your job, agree to a pay cut. Fact of the matter is that the union's (organization's) purpose is secure its existence and maximize its revenue stream (union dues). He makes six figures or more. He isn't going to hurt when Chrysler walks. So what motivation does he have if his workers don't hang him out to dry? Further, if unions didn't exist, like they do for much of the ununionized workforce, if an employer treats you badly you have two choices: 1) find a better employer, or; 2) go to the Labor Board who is known to favor workers over employers. The result: you either get a settlement and/or you find a better job. If your industry goes under (forestry anyone?), you learn something new and move on. Flexibility/adaptability is needed.


Jack
said
0 0

$76 dollars AN HOUR?!!!!!

That's obscene! No wonder North American Automakers are in trouble!


Bruce from Washington
said
0 0

These guys make 74 dollars an hour? To do what?? You don't need a college education to do what they do.....Hope Chrysler goes under....



Bob
said
0 0

As a laid off NBU Chrysler employee with 25 years of service Mr Lewenza needs a dose of reality.I need my pension. He needs to crawl out of the trailer park dust off his slept in clothes and come back to the table before HE PUTS Thousands out of work.


Chrysler parts suppliers will have to cut prices.
said
0 0

Parts suppliers will have to ply their entrepreneurial talents. They don't have to work harder, just work smarter.




Hi, I'm useless and jealous of auto workers.
said
0 0

Stick it to 'em.


Chris in Ontariariari-Oh!
said
0 0

This is the reality that the C.A.W. face's as they stick to their gun's with pattern bargaining.They know that if they give in to Chrysler G.M. is going to come back and demand the same deal.G.M. should have stuck to their gun's in demanding parity with Toyota and Honda as now they have put themselve's in the unenviable position of appearing to generous with their settlement and if you are expecting government loan's you are not in the best position to negotiate.Fiat has actually put both company's between a rock and a hard place,it will be interesting to see how this all unfold's.Let's hope it get's resolved soon as their are a lot of anxious people out there worried about there job's.


John
said
0 0

It doesn't matter if they pay them 10.00 per hr.
Chrysler produces junk that nobody wants to buy . Period.
The same goes for GM & Chrysler.
Get rid of all of the Unions & start over with Japanese management.


FergusRob
said
0 0

A vote should go to the members, it is their jobs that Fiat and the CAW are affecting. It should be up to them if they want to take consessions needed to save their jobs. The CAW is playing a dangerous game with the members caught in the middle. I would like to know what the members mood will be if Chrysler does fold and thousands loose their job. Is Buzz going to help find jobs for all those people, I doubt it.

CAW has it back up against the wall, it has virtually no public support and members are loosing their jobs. Not the mention the stress the lucky ones to be still working must have not knowing if they are going to have jobs in the next few months.

RIP Chryler, it has been a good run.



Annoyed
said
0 0

People, people....They make approximately $33+/hour plus benifits etc. That's $76+ total. If you cut that by $20/hour you end up with a total of $56/hour total (pay + benefits)


Barbara
said
0 0

First job out of school waiting for the "career break" I was a unionized employee in the manufacturing sector, not auto. I don't remember now so could someone remind me ... does the union get to charge fees according to the employee's salary or seniority or how does that go? I am wondering if they are trying to protect their own hides by keeping the wages high so the dues will be high. Just a thought.

And oh, the next vehicle I buy will be, as always, a pre-owned, built in North America, something or other that is not worth the new price five minutes after you sign the papers and drive it off the lot. For that matter they are not worth the new price just sitting in the showroom.


Peter Wiebe
said
0 0

For the sake of their own livelihoods, families and their community (Windsor), let's hope that CAW members will be considerably more flexible. Whether it's fair or not, a rigid negotiating position could cause Chrysler to leave Canada.


Keith in Brampton
said
0 0

To "unfair":

Can't speak for everyone, but I don't HATE unions - or at least the concept of them. They have historically contributed greatly to workers' rights and society generally.

BUT... some unions - and the CAW is apparently one - get so drunk with power that they lose sight of their purpose (to create fair and equitable workplaces where members are treated with dignity and respect and earn a decent living, working IN PARTNERSHIP with the employer) and would rather DESTROY a company than make the concessions needed to save jobs and (incidentally) the company.

A Union out of control is every bit as bad as a company that screws over its workers. And as Lewenza is so seriously out of touch with reality that he would jeopardize every single one of his members' jobs at Chrysler rather than renegotiate, then the CAW definitely ranks as being out of control.

Yes, there are many things wrong with Chrysler beyond labour costs. And yes, a reduction in those costs, in and of themselves, won't save the company. But all indications are the company CAN'T be saved WITHOUT concessions by the labour force.

At this point, only a fool would side with Lewenza.


Unions are no longer needed
said
0 0

It really shows that you do not need to graduate high school to get a union job. So for the CAW workers, we do not need to see you pay stubs, we know you are making about 35 dollars an hour, the 70 plus people keep mentioning is with all the cost of your benefits. And yes you are the problem


Brad
said
0 0

Does anyone believe that an employer only pays your wages. of course not all employers pay additional fees for each emplyee, EI, WCB, Medical etc.
While reading the comments against the union I feel sorry for for everyone who thinks when the unions are gone our standard of living will improve, guess again. Good manuacturing jobs provide the basis for a higher standard of living for all.



James -Eh!
said
0 0

The CAW and Ken Lewenza just don't get it. Even with their "consensions," even if they only account for 7% of a vehicles price (a claim I seriously doubt), the total costs of their salaries and benefits still make them uncompetitive with their competitors.

Why would FIAT put money into Chrysler knowing that their labour costs are out of wack? They won't.

As for the Ontario Gov. bailing out their pensions, what about the poor folk who don't have a pension? If the defined benefit plans are under funded, that means the pensioners are being paid from operations, that is from the billions obtained from government. Maybe the members should start contributing like everyone else with a pension plan. That would help lower total labour costs.


Sick of Unions whinning!!!
said
0 0

Unfair, you really don't get it don't you? That person you know is not forced to stay at that job. If they are unhappy they can leave! An employer would have a hard time filling that position and in turn would have to make working conditions more appealing for workers if they need a job done. It's called Free Market. All Union workers don't understand. When MOST people are unhappy with a job they leave. When Union workers are unhappy they strike. It's pathetic! You said, "Without a Union, he would be unable to fight such petty unbelievable things." What are you talking about? Why fight it? Just leave! Look for another job. Today's labor laws protect employees from what Unions were initially set up for. They are of no use anymore...they only harm economies.



JD
said
0 0

No more concessions from the CAW? Good, now they can go broke and fire the lot of them. Then they can begin producing cars and trucks that will be more affordable. Hooray for the little people that don't make $75 dollars per hour.


When are they going to wake up and smell the coffe
said
0 0

Consider all the input are not in the union of GM, cutting $7 per hour just won't make it!

That union leader should be voted out! The union members should have some common sense to understand that nobody would feel sorry for them if they don't cut more!

This whole thing is going on way too long. Both Government and citizens want it ended as soon as possible - one way or another!

Dreamers are also welcome to get the line up for their E.I.

Time for the union members to SPEAK UP AND MAKE THEIR FINAL DECISION!!!Life goes on!!!!!




Sean
said
0 0

Bye Bye Jobs-

The employees have negotiated their way out of their jobs.

It is crazy to think that they wouldn't make the necessary concessions.

The majority of the employees will never see equal or better paying jobs ever again...They were under worked any over paid, and they are as much to blame as the management.

There has to be a balance between what employees are worth and what they are paid.

This isn't unique to the Auto industry, look at TTC bus drivers...They are way over paid for what they do, but they hold the city hostage during negotiations...maybe that sector should be privatized...not by GM or Chrysler though.

It's too bad because they are good people, and a lot of folks will suffer over this.




Doug BC
said
0 0

Does this surprise anyone in Canada?? After all,if they let Chrysler go down they can collect their pay from the taxpayers who work for $15 per hour.
I usually support unions and buy close to home from people who create jobs in Canada.But these guys are beyond the pale.
I can barely manage to support loans to save the companies,and the jobs that go with them.But in NO WAY can I condone that if they have to keep paying their assembley line people so much more than most other semi skilled people earn.
It will be regretable to see these people use up such huge portions of our EI funds.But certainly likley to be cheaper thatn paying them to build vehicles for which there is no market.
Chapter 11, for GM.I think it will be Chapter 7 for Chrysler.
Very unfortunate for a whole lot of people.


dmac
said
0 0

The CAW has had a free ride for way to long and I am very pleased to see that so many commentators have a similar view. I am a fan of Lee Kuan Yew the former Prime Minister of Singapore and the real architect of that country’s success. Like any strong leader he has faults but overall he is the main person responsible for the Singapore of today. When discussing how unions almost destroyed the whole way of life in Singapore and how these entities were controlled Mr. Lee’s statement is ‘people forget that we are only two or three generations removed from digging roots from the ground or picking fruit from the trees just to survive’. This statement holds true for Canada in the same manner. The leadership of the CAW has long forgotten that in order to be able to maintain a strong position one should have built a strong foundation and all the CAW has ever done is build their position on the success of other people’s business. They only have loud talk, bravado, bluff and an indefensible attitude of entitlement to support their position. Stand tough Fiat and bring these leaches down.


Toronto
said
0 0

Goodnight Windsor. May you rest in peace.


krissyt
said
0 0

all share holders demands are threatening the economy.they will have to take less money.


Ice Cream
said
0 0

The sense of entitlement from the CAW workers is astonishing. The cold hard truth is, Chrysler does not owe you a job. They have already paid for your service with the company. You might not enjoy pay cuts or the thought of sacrifice but ultimately it your choice whether you want to work for Chrysler or not. At the end of the day the company must be profitable and management will do whatever it takes to make it profitable. Understand that in this case, the company is not asking but telling you the way it’s going to be. Good luck.


Rob
said
0 0

You know what, the union just not seem to understand the warning shots, maybe its time to put one of the the Big 3 to rest so maybe then they will realize that reality might resuscitate what is left.


Buck
said
0 0

suck it up CAW


trimmer 905
said
0 0

Autoworkers don't now,nor did they ever,even by the wildest calculations unless you include every pen,pencil and sheet of paper in the entire company,including benefits,make $76/hr.Some idiot blogger in the US came up with that figure and the media was all over it like white on rice.But,believe what you will.Don't ever do your own research or anything!It amazes me that people still believe all the BS about the auto industry.


No Sympathy
said
0 0

I think the comments about the auto workers' sense of entitlement sum it all up.

These unskilled jokers have had it too good for way too long. In these times it's all about being competitive and efficient. Unions, especially the CAW, don't care about in either one.

The bottom line in the real world is "if you're not happy with your job, go get a better one". Holding your employer over a barrel may work for a while when times are good, but it never works when times are tough.

It looks like my next new vehicle will not be from the "big 3". Bye Bye.


Lyle
said
0 0

I smell the end of the Big 3 in Canada. The CAW's stance is bizarre.


Chris Ont
said
0 0

For all the Einsteins posting here:
Total compensation paid for labour divided by total hours worked by labour creates an average hourly wage.
When stateing this must be cut by $20.00 hour, does not mean that you would be earning $13.00/hour.
You may need to go to $30.00/hr along with giving up paid day's, maybe required to now have to co-pay for certain health benifits.
Spa day's may need to be cancelled as well, and maybe some changes to your pension plan funding.
With less taxable benifits and paying less taxes chances are good your take home pay would not be that different than now.
Believing you are forced to work in deplorable conditions as well as having to adhere to rules that seem unfair, remember that it was your union that while demanding raises sold out on getting you more toilet breaks. Having seen the inside of a few auto plants, on average to walk to the washroom and return at $33.00 an hour cost the company between $8-$9 dollars.
Hourly cost when benifit costs are included at $70.00 is between $17-$18 dollars. If most workers on a shift took one extra bathroom break a day, it could bankrupt the company.

Is it possible what caused this problem was people just pissed them away so to speak?




Winny
said
0 0

TO LC, Brampton:

No one is asking to cut your overpaid husband's hourly rate. The cuts that are being asked for are related to benefits. The $70 an hour cost per employee includes salary + benefits.

Good luck to you and your family at the food bank. If the CAW does not move from its stance your husband WILL lose his job. The rest of Canada will NOT be in any mood to support CAW workers. Good luck finding another job when the economy picks up. If the auto industry leaves, I won't be surprised if employees will be reluctant to hire any former CAW workers.


James in Edmonton
said
0 0

the real problem lies with CAW be because labor cost is too much and is eating up chyrsler's profit but not any of big 3 auto at all. if chrysler shut down it's operation in canada then so be it. CAW will pay heavy prices for any job losses because of refusing to give up anything much more that auto companies ask them to.


Mike in Guelph
said
0 0

I can't sit back and listen to this crap any longer...

Business Math 101

No one assembling a car, building parts for a car or shipping car parts to a factory makes $153k a year. Give your head a shake, smarten up and stop mouthing off about things you know ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT!!! Do some bloody research before you spout off stupidity like this and stop wasting EVERYONE'S TIME - you make yourself and everyone else dumber for such comments.

REALITY:

Wages = $28/hr on average (I said average remember - look it up if you think I'm wrong)

Loaded cost of an in-house employee is added to the base salary and is typically 1.5-1.8x the base salary. This figure includes health benefits, pensions, WSIB, costs of employing people that the EMPLOYER pays, not the employee = LOTS in the automotive industry, in this case, it's around $42 an hour.

Yes, the unions are responsible for asking for these kinds of concessions and company management are responsible for not negotiating better.

No unions won't fix the problem but it will help IMHO. Having better union relations with companies is key with realistic and FAIR working conditions and compensation. This is greed on all sides, plain and simple. We've all lived WELL beyond our means and it's time for a BIG correction and a wake up call.

The $19 an hour concession is a reduction in pensions and benefits combined with lower hourly wages. $28 an hour is a decent wage overall for unskilled labour. Sorry, it is. Simply put. It's hard work but so is general contracting, landscaping and the like - all of which pay NO WHERE NEAR $28 an hour. 1/2 that and you're in the ballpark. Just my 2c.




Don
said
0 0

The CAW says "c reativity!!! Well...lets here their plan. Actually, i am so sick of it i don't want to hear it. Chrysler should just declare bankrupsy. Do what they have to do. Fiat should say take it or leave it. The problems will never end until the union is ended and people see that they need to get on with their lives. The autoworkers are now a hindrance to the economy getting back on track. We need surgery.


Richard Carpenter
said
0 0

I can not believe the CAW stance. Yes the wage parity would be a set back in their eyes AND would set the tone for re-negotiations with Ford and GM, BUT it is a hell of lot more than the majority of people working at equivalent types of jobs. I have been a Supervisor in Plastics for years and no where has my wages been even close to these guys!!! We are competing against the world outside of North America and no else makes these wages.You will find a hell of lot lower income on Employment Insurance and will end up working( if they can find a job) making $12.00/hour with"no benefits" Deal with reality boys and girls.


Tim Oshawa
said
0 0

Well just think... if over the past 25 years...you would have put your CAW dues into a savings account instead you would have over $400,000.00 sitting in your bank.
I think the CAW has been living quite well over the years.
Mr Lewenza ..How's IE sound to you ? It's coming sooner then you think..



Ron in Edmonton
said
0 0

OH BOOO HOO!

These uneducated, over-paid, whining CAW workers think that $55.00 per hour is too low?? What reality do they live in? Get with the real world people. You're not that important. If the CAW thinks that "its got to be tough" when the wages are "slashed" to $55/hour, then in reality, I do hope that the whole Canadian and American auto industry goes belly up. You get what you deserve ... and lets see how long you last on EI.


Green McLander
said
0 0

To: LC, Brampton,

You have made your point about the union workers' wages. We get it cystal CLEAR!

However... how the workers make isn't the problem. It's the benefits, the legeny costs and whatever IS the problem!! I don't care if your husband make $10, 30, or 35 per hour. THAT is NOT the point. I don't care how you defend in whatever your husband did good in his job. It's the UNION itself that did themselves into their dismise because they kept jacking up all their requests, demeands or new contracts the Big 3 in Canada don't like but are forced to keep up with production.

Well, it's over - CAW have hit their limit. There's nothing to contiune, as long the CAW refuse to change its character to be humble to save their jobs.

Well, won't be long before we see Chysler and GM move back to USA - eh? I refuse to buy NEW vechiles for 24 years because of high prices anyway, and their designs are boring - no vision in there.





Lee
said
0 0

After 40 years in the car business and many union leaders later I feel comfortable and confident in saying Ken Lewenza is a first class moron. t


Ian in Peterborough
said
0 0

I work for ELEVEN dollars an hour. These people get NO sympathy from me.


PVT
said
0 0

Click - BANG - that's the sound of the CAW shooting the Canadian auto sector right between the eyes. Nice - yet another glaring example of how labour unions have lost their usefulness in modern society.


Shelley from Tillsonburg
said
0 0

Where would we be if there was never any change? There is a story about a guy who had to learn the hard way that sometimes what you have always been doing may not be what you will always do. Because of his ability to change we no longer drive Model T's.

Unions were great when workers were forced to work 18 hour days in the dark without breaks, meals, or proper sanitation. Haven't heard any reports of that lately in Canada.

$40+ an hour to build cars..you wonder why we can't afford them. Why do people in the health care field make the same as auto manufacturers?

To those running the CAW and to those who speak for the thousands of workers...Who will pay dues (your wages) when GM and Chrysler are gone? Maybe the days of making $85,000 a year to bolt in seats are gone. That should not come as a surprise.

You say you have the worker's interests in mind as you walk away from the negotiating table. Your workers will be able to relate. They might be walking away from the supper table wondering where their next meal will come from.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz