News Sections
Census objector struggled over morality of decision
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(72)
By: Andy Johnson, CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sun. Apr. 12 2009 4:20 PM ET
The decision to object to the 2006 census was easy for Todd Stelmach.
After learning that U.S. arms manufacturer Lockheed Martin had been awarded the contract to perform the survey, he immediately decided his religious and anti-war beliefs wouldn't allow him to participate.
"I feel as a Christian we need to pursue peace and resist and oppose militarism and all forms of war," Stelmach says simply of his decision.
But the two years and lengthy court battle that have followed have been anything but simple, and there have been many moments when the 32-year-old Kingston, Ont. healthcare worker questioned whether he made the right decision.
When a judge handed down his ruling last week, and the process was finally over, Stelmach knew the fight was worthwhile -- and that he was glad it was over and he was still a free man.
Ontario Court Justice Charles Anderson found Stelmach guilty of refusing to sign the census and issued a $300 fine. But Stelmach avoided up to three months of possible jail time. As well, there was no court order that he sign the census -- something the Crown had sought.
'Personal victory'
Stelmach, who had pleaded not-guilty, called it a "personal victory" and said he wouldn't have been able to obey such a court order and would have faced a possible criminal record as a result.
That prospect worried Stelmach, especially after he learned recently that his wife was pregnant.
"It made me question whether I still wanted to go through with it," he tells CTV.ca. "It suddenly felt like the costs were greater if I were to get a criminal record from not complying with a court order, if I was given one."
As a devout Christian, Stelmach also wrestled with the implications of his decision to openly flout the law. He admits he "waffled back and forth in the early stages."
"There's a passage in scripture, Romans 13, that asks us to submit to the governing authorities and I had to do a lot of reading and a lot of praying to decide whether this was one of those circumstances where I had to disobey the authorities," Stelmach said.
For guidance, he sought out writings by Mennonite theologians whose way of life often forces them to take similar choices.
"My final conclusion was the idea that I can submit to the governing authorities' punishment but I don't necessarily need to obey if I feel that doing so would compromise my beliefs," he explains.
Supporting Lockheed Martin Ltd. Canada, a subsidiary of the U.S. weapons giant Lockheed Martin Corporation, which Stelmach says manufactures cluster bombs, would have represented that level of compromise.
Lockheed Martin has been providing census services for a decade, contracted to carry out data collection, processing and analysis services, according to its website.
Their clients have included the U.S., Canada and the U.K. -- where protests have emerged over the decision to award the 2011 census contract to Lockheed Martin.
Stelmach's sentence
While the judge's final decision wasn't what Stelmach hoped for, it could have been much worse.
The Crown had argued for a $100 fine and a court order that he be ordered to fill out the census.
Stelmach suggested that instead of being forced to fill out the forms, he could do community service in populations typically underserved by the census, such as among the homeless.
In the end the judge decided to increase the fine, but forego the court order.
Stelmach said he had the full support of his place of worship, the Next Church of Kingston, in his fight.
Lockheed Martin, which provided the software for the 2006 census, also has the contract for the 2011 census.
He called on Canadians to oppose the involvement of a U.S. arms manufacturer in the Canadian census, and says he will resist the census again, if need be.
"If Lockheed Martin is involved with the 2011 census I will not co-operate. I will find ways to do that. Would I go as far to plead not guilty in a trial? Maybe not."
User Tools
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(72)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Jeremy Jones
0
said
0
I think next time around there may be more people following in his footsteps.
Liz, Wellingotn
0
said
0
M. Cameron
0
said
0
Happy Canadian
0
said
0
My problem is not the arms manufacture part (which is good, because my employer was recently purchased by this type of company) but that detailed information is freely given to a private company. And we know what their moral values are like.
Jen
0
said
0
Jack A Lope
0
said
0
Earl Robert
0
said
0
Suzy
0
said
0
If you've ever recieved a parcel, you will find it was tracked via GPS, another military conception.
It's fruitless to "fast" from anything related to the military.
A noble gesture Mr. Stelmach. I support you, but unfortunately I don't think there is much we can do.
One promising thought: the Romans did fall eventually!
Brian, in Brantford, ON
0
said
0
What Stelmach has done could be considered parallel to those women in Afghanistan who do not obey the newly enacted law that gives men the right of marital rape (among other repressive measures), and many people in Canada would support women who, in their personal conscience, are willing to "flout" the law, as the law violates their personal rights as a human.
Stelmach,despite his ambivalence, was willing to go just as far to show that the law requiring him to submit to a company that manufactures armaments (which cause so much death, destruction and pain in humans) for the purpose of a census was just as much a violation of his personal rights as a human.
Even though he had to pay the fine, triple that requested by the crown, the fact that he did not have to sign the census was a sign that conscience, in humans, is still worth pursuing, and blind obedience to any state would, ultimately, lead to the end of the human conscience, and most likely, to the end of the human race.
Mel from Calgary
0
said
0
With the U.S. Patriot Act able to look into any computer in the U.S., Canada must do all this personal database gathering at home with Canadian companies not bound by this nefarious act.
Mike
0
said
0
Rob F
0
said
0
I also noticed that he has support of the group Christian Peacemakers Team, the same group who had people kidnapped and one executed in Iraq and was subsequently rescued by special forces. Anyone else see the irony in a group who opposes war getting rescued by special forces?
Valorie
0
said
0
Khai
0
said
0
Chris in Ontariariari-Oh!
0
said
0
We would probably be pretty limited in our purchasing ability if we were to refuse to buy from every company who may in some way be connected to an issue of religious or personal concern as there are many businesses out there that are interconnected. I'm willing to bet most people wouldn't know many of the firms they buy products everyday from may have a military connection or do business with them. As far as the Mennonites are concerned their views are varied. All you have to do is look at how they live. Some have hydro while some will run on alternative electrical systems and some have no hydro at all. Their use of technology is as limited as are their belief's and for that reason I would be skeptical. This seems to me to have been taken to the extreme as the guy is guilty and is lucky to get off as easy as he did. He shouldn't be treated differently in this case as this will only open the door to other questionable cases as his, resulting in more of a burden and possible abuse of the system at taxpayers' expense.
Don from Ottawa
0
said
0
Whether you object on technical grounds as Stelmach did, or have more practical concerns such as disclosing your ethnic background to unknown future governments, it is too much Big Brother in our lives.
The census should include a "prefer not to answer" option.
Haywood J.
0
said
0
Josh Winkler Manitoba
0
said
0
Next time a census taker comes to my door if it is a Liberal I will slam the door in their face, because I don't like them for their anti-religious stance on many things.
Prophet Bob from Calgary
0
said
0
Dave LeClair
0
said
0
Jon in Burl.
0
said
0
In the end he is guilty and should have been.
We can all find passages to support our beliefs...Look at the Radical Muslums who murder innocent people with Bombs. Any average Muslim would say these people are fools. The Koran doea not support any of these things. It is just some fringe radicals interpretation.It was Gods will, God said I should do it. This is poopycock, we just need to blame somebody for our bad decisions in life.
Wade Ens - Mennonites won't fight for Commies
0
said
0
Menno Simms was actually just a good Catholic so whent the Catholics switched from full body emerison baptistism and went for the wet the head, and the Catholics made it so you could pay sins to be forigiven the Menno Simms said no no no.
So if this guy is trying to say Mennonites don't fight he is taking the history out of context, they just won't fight for communists.
His Church isn't a mennoite church either, sounds like just a trouble maker.
Dave
0
said
0
Frunk
0
said
0
Henry Wysmulek
0
said
0
Rick
0
said
0
DVC
0
said
0
islander
0
said
0
Bob
0
said
0
Susan R. in B.C
0
said
0
I think he raised a good point though alerting us to Lockheed Martin's involvement in census. What's that about, would like to learn more
Steve Dartmouth. He just wants attention
0
said
0
Waste
0
said
0
Walking Man
0
said
0
Orwell's 1984 nears, with each passing day.
my own person
0
said
0
If a person belongs to themselves, then the "authorities" need the individual's permission.
If a person is the property of the "authorities" then it is the individual who needs the permission.
No person is the property of the "authorities" in a free country.
I don't often hear the politicians talking much any more about Canada being a free country.
Terry
0
said
0
concerned canadian
0
said
0
James VanVolkingburgh
0
said
0
Chris B in Liberal Toronto
0
said
0
Did this guy ever serve in the military like thousands of brave men and women soldiers who fight for FREEDOMS around the world?
It makes me sick!!!
Vancouver Joe
0
said
0
schpid
0
said
0
What a waste!
0
said
0
Robert N
0
said
0
Why are Canadians companies not doing this. I think that is the better question - why are we exporting our jobs.
Next it will be in a call centre overseas !!
All wrong. !!
Adam
0
said
0
Frank Buchan (Vauxhall, Alberta by way of Ontario)
0
said
0
As for the census, since it was meant to help allocate resources, maybe those who want to abstain should be allowed to, but should also be left out of health care and other systems that use this data? I somehow think that would be called petty, but the point is that we're talking about fairly useful data (in most cases).
Bob Boles
0
said
0
Sol Trickey
0
said
0
Alex
0
said
0
I'd have to know more about what Lockheed Martin's weapons are specifically used for before supporting or opposing him. I'll never condone armed aggression, but I'm not a pacifist when it comes to defense.
Dan from Northern Ont
0
said
0
Garry in NS
0
said
0
Ken in Victoria
0
said
0
Rick in NB
0
said
0
So in my opinion, when you use God to make your point. You are hiding behind God.
JB at the UofC
0
said
0
Terry stated it nicely "blind obedience," the unfortunate part is that because this is North America, Stelmach had to go at this alone, if this was Europe there would have been crowds supporting him.
But we do what we do best, "yes, I'll sign those forms for ya" then we duck our heads and pay no attention to the slaves who stand up to "the Man". (no offense is intended towards those who might take offense)
Gail (Hamilton)
0
said
0
Rosz
0
said
0
How hypocritical of our "untouchable" goverment to employ this business to conduct it's own! The makers of death and contributors to the gun situation which enables the drugs. Throw out all of the gov and let's start over.
Brad B
0
said
0
1. Do you think the Government went out and chose this company? No, they bid the contract and anyone who thinks they can do it will bid on it. Based on the evaluation criteria (which you can find out if you care enough), Lockheed Martin won.
2. How many people do you think Lockheed Martin (Canada) employs? In the thousands, with all the military and aerospace contracts they hold.
DS
0
said
0
Christians know that war is a judgment on sin, so his pious morals have no biblical basis.
Look at me.. look at me!
0
said
0
This is just another example of an attention craving individual trying to find a way to say "look at me, look at me".
As for the issue of an American company doing the survey, if they are more efficient than Canadian companies, they deserve to get the work. Remember the protectionism issues we were all worried about recently? Well, it works both ways.
Wise Wajid
0
said
0
Bundy
0
said
0
Michael
0
said
0
Hagios
0
said
0
Governments are supposed to be for the people not the reverse and its about time the anal retentive socialist liberals understood that fact and got with the program instead of trying to expand government thereby ensuring our rights are diminished.
Doug BC
0
said
0
There's nothing noble or principled in his stand.His position is just an excuse to use the census as a means of objecting to something else he doesn't like.
Census taking provides valuable information to the people to whom we assign the task of building all of our social programs,our tax system,our infrastructure and almost every service we demand of government.It is shear lunacy to think you can build anything without an accurate blue print.
If every one of us who had a beef with government took a similar stand,we'd all be whining about why government doesn't reflect the make-up of our citizens.They'd be trying to nation build with blindfolds in place.
I am close to extreme about issues of freedom and privacy,and I still see his position as nonsense.And even if it wasn't,the right thing to do if you don't like a law,is to work to change that law.Not to pick and choose which laws apply to you,and which laws apply to your neighbour,etc,etc.
In a democracy,if the vast majority of the people agree with you,the law will be changed.In the mean time,I think you need to respect ALL the laws of any country you wish to live in.
"Personal conscience"!! What a joke that is.What's really sad is how many people are buying into his dribble.
Mike from Edmonton
0
said
0
Mark (Ottawa)
0
said
0
elle ryker-lychkova
0
said
0
Heavy hand of government slaps a regular guy
0
said
0
I once tried to decline to put my and my children's names on the Census form because I could not understand how having our names would help the government with gathering important demographic information.
I very quickly received a low key but extremely threatening phone call to the effect that I really had no choice unless I wanted to chance a jail sentence or at the very least, a heavy fine.
I conceeded rather than take the chance that they would ruin me.
I have to say it surprises me that this weapons manufacturer conducts surveys as a sideline.
It is disturbing to anyone who considers a stand for peace important.
The way war is conducted in today's world, the last thing I want to do is to put more money into their pockets so they can dream up better and more efficient ways to help kill mostly innocent people.
That being said, you really have no choice in the matter unless you are willing to go to the wall and literally risk everything like this man did.
Pat
0
said
0
Some comments reference him getting his 15 minutes of fame from this as they do not see this as something which concerned them. Should it have been an issue more personal to them, they would have seen it differently.
I refused for some time to complete it for different reasons but found my family being intimidated by the workers/government. I broke because of the family intimindation. I understand his concern of his growing family. I do respect him for standing for his beliefs.
Too many take a cavalier attitude of it's not their problem with everything yet find it easy to b*tch about it, yet do nothing.
If people don't stand up to change issues, the envelope gets pushed even further to see what they can get away with.
Ian in Tokyo
0
said
0
island girl
0
said
0
So the Bible should be kept out of court proceedings? What was that book people were to give an oath on? By whom do you swear to tell the whole truth? Maybe it's changed now and that's why so many lie in court.
Sam C
0
said
0
However, if he is taking a stand against Lockheed Martin, he needs to further examine other aspects of his life to ensure he is not supporting them in other ways.
LM is a large supplier of IT systems, and various space-based systems such as weather forecasting and global communications.
It may be more difficult to avoid contact with a corporation like LM than he believes.
And really, whether it's LM or IBM, what company doesn't have SOME contact with the military?
Bee
0
said
0
In any event, I refused to answer some of the census questions due to privacy concerns and they didn't seem to mind.
Derek
0
said
0
Good on you for standing up.