CTV News | Crew on U.S. ship says Somali pirates hold captain

Top Stories -   

Crew on U.S. ship says Somali pirates hold captain

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Paul Workman on the tense standoff
CTV Newsnet: Maritime security expert Nick Davis on hijacking
Canada AM: Sailors were unharmed during incident

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(29)

The Associated Press

Date: Wed. Apr. 8 2009 10:29 PM ET

NAIROBI, Kenya — The American crew of a hijacked U.S.-flagged ship retook control of the vessel from Somalian pirates Wednesday but the captain was still being held hostage in a lifeboat, according to at least three people on board.

A spokesman for the ship company Maersk, Kevin Speers, tells AP Radio that the destroyer USS Bainbridge is on the scene.

He adds that the boat with the pirates is floating near the Maersk Alabama.

The Bainbridge was among several U.S. ships, including the cruiser USS Gettysburg, that are patrolling in the region.

"Right now they want to hold our captain for ransom, and we are trying to get him back," second mate Ken Quinn told CNN in a live interview after the cable news network called the boat.

"We had one of their hostages, we had a pirate. We took him for 12 hours. We tied him up. We returned him. But they didn't return the captain," Quinn said.

The captain was on a lifeboat with the pirates, Quinn said.

"Right now we are trying to offer them whatever we can, food. It's not working too good," Quinn said.

He said the crew was communicating with the captain by radio.

The company that operates the ship confirmed that it was back in the crew's hands and said the hijackers had departed with a crew member.

Capt. Joseph Murphy, an instructor at the Massachusetts Maritime Academy, told The Associated Press that he was called by the Department of Defence and told the crew, including his son Shane, the second in command, had control of the ship.

Murphy's wife, Serena Murphy, of Seekonk, Massachusetts, told the AP her husband said by phone that he was OK, but that pirates had taken the captain off the ship and he was now in charge.

Colin Wright, who identified himself as a third mate aboard the ship, told the AP that, "Somalian pirates have one of our crew members in our lifeboat and we are trying to recover that crew member."

Asked whether that crew member was the ship's captain, Collin told the AP he couldn't say anything else. A person aboard the ship told the AP by phone earlier that it was the captain who was being held by the pirates.

At one point, the pirates had held the boat and the entire crew of Americans. Wright said: "We're really busy right now, but you can call back in an hour or two."

U.S. President Barack Obama was following the situation closely, foreign policy adviser Denis McDonough said.

Andrea Phillips, the wife of Capt. Richard Phillips of Underhill, Vermont, said her husband has sailed in the waters off Somalia "for quite some time" and a hijacking was perhaps "inevitable."

The ship was carrying emergency food relief to Mombasa, Kenya, when it was hijacked, the Copenhagen-based container shipping group A.P. Moller-Maersk said.

"We are able to confirm that the crew of the Maersk Alabama has is now in control of the ship," said Kevin Speers, a spokesman for Maersk Lines Limited. "The armed hijackers who boarded this ship earlier today have departed, however they are currently holding one member of the ship's crew as a hostage. The other members of the crew are safe and no injuries have been reported."

It was the sixth vessel seized within a week, a rise that analysts attribute to a new strategy by Somali pirates who are operating far from the warships patrolling the Gulf of Aden.

Cmdr. Jane Campbell, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Navy's Bahrain-based 5th Fleet, said that it was the first pirate attack "involving U.S. nationals and a U.S.-flagged vessel in recent memory." She did not give an exact timeframe.

Joseph Murphy, a professor at the Massachusetts Maritime Academy, said his son was a 2001 graduate who recently talked to a class about the dangers of piracy.

Somali pirates are trained fighters who frequently dress in military fatigues and use speedboats equipped with satellite phones and GPS equipment. They are typically armed with automatic weapons, anti-tank rocket launchers and various types of grenades. Far out to sea, their speedboats operate from larger mother ships.

The U.S. navy said that the ship was hijacked early Wednesday about 450 kilometres southeast of Eyl, a town in the northern Puntland region of Somalia.

U.S. navy spokesman Lt. Nathan Christensen said the closest U.S. ship at the time of the hijacking was 555 kilometres away.

The Combined Maritime Forces issued an advisory Wednesday highlighting several recent attacks that occurred hundreds of kilometres off the Somali coast and stating that merchant mariners should be increasingly vigilant when operating in those waters.

Since January, pirates have staged 66 attacks, and they are still holding 14 ships and 260 crew members as hostages, according to the International Maritime Bureau, a watchdog group based in Kuala Lumpur.

There are fewer than 200 U.S.-flagged vessels in international waters, said Larry Howard, chair of the Global Business and Transportation Department at SUNY Maritime College in New York.

Comments are now closed for this story

Greg in Cambridge
said

In the water is too good for them. Time to make an example of those low life thieves.

Way to go USA!


Brian, Stittsville
said

lol i love it.

"...in the water" for the other hi-jackers.

Show these punks who's in charge and fight back.


Roger T
said

I find it hard to believe that the crews over power the pirates within hours. Must be CNN twisiting the plot so the Americans don't look stupid or America will lose face.

I wouldn't be surprise that CNN news or any of the US news stations turn the headlines to a positive one.

Can never trust these positive headlines especially within hours of bad to good!


rr
said

These pirates are not bad people. Learn what's going on in Somalia before you comment.


Brian
said

US Crew & Flag, maybe the crew were better armed than the pirates! Hope they are safe and in control.


Andy Y - Vancouver
said

Well if the Yanks didn't retake their ship, the pirates would have had to deal with Navy Seals.

Either way, this would not have ended well for them...

Bottom line, for all their warts, the Yankees take care of their own...


roy
said

Its time that all vessels entering those waters should be armed,and when the need be drown those sobs.


steve
said

I was a seaman in 80's. Pirate at that time was rare. Make all those low life thieves go to water.


WTG crew!
said

...when is the movie coming out?


Don in Ottawa
said

Ships generally don't have yardarms these days , but surely there is someplace board from which they could be hanged. In the 18th century they knew how to deal with piracy.


annie, ontario
said

It still mystifies my why these ships don't carry armed security, with all the hi-jackings that have happened.

The cost would be well worth it.


Terry
said

Why don't the shipping companies pay for small armed security teams for these ships? I would think that it would be considerably more cost effective than paying millions to ransom ships and crews.


jm
said

not bad people? get a grip! I dont't care what is going on in their country- whenever weapons are involved--somebody will eventually get killed.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

PIRATE SCHOOL DROP-OUTS

Trying to wrestle control of a ship sporting the U.S. flag is the mark of a collection of idiots looking to die...or, at least, get caught and jailed.

Evidently, they weren't paying attention in class on the day the teacher was using his pointer to identify international flags to avoid at all cost.

Feed them to the sharks.



tim
said

I can't for the life of me figure out why some Naval Frigate just doesn't blow these pirates out of the water. 1 missile, 1 blown up pirate vessel and a bunch of dead pirates would send a VERY STRONG SIGNAL to any future would-be pirates. Enough is enough.


Fred - Caledon
said

As I understand it, ships that are "armed" (except military)are barred from most ports around the world.

As the usual "water cannon" defense is no match for automatic weapons/granades or anti-tank rocket launchers, why don't these ships travel in "convoy" (as they did in WW-2) when going through these areas?

Good show - USA, put's a smile on my face.


Abdula
said

Don in Ottawa said:
"Ships generally don't have yardarms these days , but surely there is someplace board from which they could be hanged. In the 18th century they knew how to deal with piracy."

Oh and that would be good?

And in the same time they would take a rope and drag you under the ship during sail, ripping your skin off on the barnicles, just because you over slept. They called it Keel hauling and it was a form of discipline.

Why do right wing people think that the old days were the "good old days."

There was nothing good about the days of press gangs and slavery.



Walking Man
said

Well these pirates a "swashbuckling Errol Flynn" they are not.

Learn the lessons of plane hi-jacking days and deal with this new threat before it gets out of hand completely.

I'm with prof Pye on this one, shark bait.


Rob
said

More armed security need to be hired...giving the commercial sailors a crash course on weapon handling is a cheap shortcut, that will get friendlys killed. Do the math, cheaper to have a small section of security than a ship taken hostage for a few million, and your employees lives at serious risk.


what would you do?
said

I wonder what people around here would do if they had no jobs and where in complete poverty, ships coming into there waters and stealing fish by the millions and dumping toxic waste off the coast line? Find out what's going on in the country first before you make comments.


BCDean
said

Every criminal in the world can justify their actions. How is attacking shipping traffic in international water protecting their fish?


Mark W
said

The only way these attacks can and will be stop is when enough of these pirates get killed at sea.

Denise
said

To RR

Sorry but although I sympathize with the horrendous situation in Somalia, "two wrongs don't make a right"....and for many pirates the situation provides an excuse to murder and plunder for profit.


Bill in Ottawa
said

OK...so, after reading this article I went to hundred different websites, learned the history of Somalia (1890's - present) and made myself aware of the geography and culture. I still think piracy is the WRONG answer and that just because a country is in turmoil, doesn't mean it gives the radical-militarist extremeists the right to plunder shipping traffic.



Andy Y - Vancouver
said

I find it amusing that these "high tech" pirates are using GPS and Satellite Phones are actually thinking they are going to get away with this...

Are they aware of who "owns" the satellites they are using?
Makes them very trackable to the US forces.

The Yankees were content with their NIMBY attitude until US property and citizens became threatened.

Now, Pres. Obama might just order their mother ship wiped out to end this nonsense once and for all or send in Seals and Special Forces to shut down their headquarters permanently.


common sense - max
said

What I find most interesting is that I am sure most here realize the situation in Somalia, and still would rather hang pirates rather than have them rob merchant ships. I'm sorry, but I don't think many care when it comes to people taking up piracy over unemployment. Piracy should be punished with the utmost brutality. If it worked it the 17th and 18th centuries, it can work now. Especially with the resources the 21st century can offer us.


Charles Calnan, Delta
said

For Andy Y, Vancouver
For your info, GPS receivers are totally passive, and the satellites have no return contact signal from them.


Gary From Caronport
said

Here is a thought. What if they are not just blowing these Pirates out of the water for the sake of tracking where the stolen goods are going or being sold to, or maybe find out who is really behind the capture of these vessels.

Also, I am not sure if Killing the pirates is the best option, what gives us the right to take the life of another?


Don
said

Piracy has been dealt with most harshly throughout history. I can't believe they have been getting away with it for so long. It's not about poverty, or living conditions in Somalia. It's about gettin' a pile of cash and bling and gettin' laid in Somalia. Now that they have attacked a US flagged vessel, the US is free to destroy them. Despite the fact the vessel is foreign owned, they do have this option. Since they are in the neighbourhood, they might as well get it over with. The idea is to really discourage the act of piracy, wipe them out to the last man.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz