Canada -
News Sections
Feds to back warranties if automaker fails
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(119)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Apr. 7 2009 8:13 PM ET
Ottawa is providing up to $185 million to guarantee warranties on vehicles sold by General Motors and Chrysler, as the companies attempt to restructure, and another $700 million to protect hard-hit auto parts suppliers.
Industry Minister Tony Clement said consumers do not have to do anything to receive the federal warranty commitment -- if either company were to go bankrupt.
However, Clement said it only applies to new vehicles sold as of Tuesday until the restructuring period is over.
"This is a new program. It matches, very clearly, what the United States has been doing," Clement said.
"On a go-forward basis, as things become less stable, we felt that this was a way to assure the buyer that if you buy a GM product, or if you buy a Chrysler product, your 5-year warranty for parts and labour and service will be acted upon."
The program is expected to cost the government $185.3 million.
General Motors Canada welcomed the announcement, and said in a press release, "We remain focused on taking all necessary steps, working with the governments and all our stakeholders to quickly and successfully complete our restructuring in this challenging market."
Canadian Auto Workers president Ken Lewenza also backed the move.
"There seems to be a pattern -- that the Canadian is following whatever the U.S. government does," Lewenza told CTV's Power Play on Tuesday. "I would suggest that's appropriate for them to do that, in terms of the warranty support."
Last week, U.S. President Barack Obama announced a similar measure saying his government would help consumers by backstopping auto warranties.
Earlier Tuesday, Reuters reported that GM was in intense and earnest preparations for a bankruptcy filing. The move, which would likely also occur in Canada, would allow the company to restructure.
"There used to be a phrase in the auto sector: Too big to fail," Clement said when asked about the report. "I don't think that phrase exists anymore in this sector."
If the company does file for bankruptcy, one analyst says assembly line workers would likely be safe, but not suppliers and dealers.
Bill Pochiluk, president of industry adviser AutomotiveCompass, told The Canadian Press that GM's assembly plants may be safe because, "from a production standpoint, the product mix in Canada really is quite excellent."
But he added that filing for bankruptcy may damage the company's brand and cut into sales.
"One of the reasons to try and keep these companies around as long as possible is the impact that would have on the supply chain," he said. "It would be dissolving before our very eyes and it might be difficult for anyone to produce vehicles."
About 12,500 people in Canada work for GM, mostly at assembly plants in southern Ontario.
Clement also announced $700 million in additional help for struggling auto parts manufacturers.
The money will be given to Export Development Canada's Accounts Receivable Insurance program, which is available to parts suppliers.
Accounts receivable can be one of the largest assets on a supplier's balance sheet and the recent global credit situation has pinched these companies' cash flow to a trickle, Clement said.
Canada has more than 650 auto parts suppliers which shipped a combined total of nearly $33 billion worth of supplies in 2007.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
Autos.CTV.ca
In Pictures
Power Play with Tom Clark
Whispers about the auto industry can be summed up in one word -- bankruptcy. The government, union and car dealers respond.
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(119)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.










Comments are now closed for this story
Why does Tony Clement hate freedom?
said
It's not up to the government to pick winners in the economy.
Stop the Conservative Socialist intrusion in the marketplace.
Where's my bailout?
said
Matt
said
Few would buy a new car without a warranty, guaranteeing the warranty should help car sales, or at least keep them from collapsing.
stan m
said
their books, or just read the 56 page we need report? Was the loss's just the loss of sales, or did these companies goof up elsewhere?
Jason in Kelowna
said
I find it funny that I haven't seen any NA news makers report that Ford managed to reduce their debt by $9.9 Billion and is the only auto maker who HAS NOT asked for a bailout.
smitty
said
Dan from Northern Ont
said
S in S
said
stevo
said
Dave in Toronto
said
Nick in Gatineau
said
These guys couldn't figure out how to pay for rebates on 'Green' cars so they canned the program leaving people who bought the cars in the hopes of obtaining the very incentive promised without getting a dime.
Now they want to back warranties ?
Steve in Ottawa
said
Ry
said
DCR-Toronto
said
Libertarian Party is looking like the only true Conservative Party left. The government is now taking on warranties? What are we going to have...a hotline at Tony Clements office to send out a tow truck and fix someones engine? This actually makes my blood boil.
Canadian19
said
berlioz
said
Or, are they talking out of both sides of the same mouth.
Either way, they won't be round for much longer.
Jaret
said
This government intervention is not helping our economy. The politicians should go back to balanced budgets, and allow Canadians to solve this problem ourselves.
Hunter
said
I know I would not be able to afford repairs if my new vehicle needed major work, why should I suffer further if an automaker fails. This will help the automakers, but it will also help the consumer, and the money is only spent IF the automaker fails and IF the vehicle needs repairs under warranty.
MRC in Ontario
said
To all those who complain of Detroit-3 quality: Restructuring doesn't happen within several months but rather several years, which is the truth. Drive a Chevrolet Malibu, drive a Ford Fusion, drive a Buick (that just dethroned Lexus for ultimate quality), etc. And look out for the first mass-produced electric-powertrain vehicle, Chevrolet Volt, next year. But want to bet that majority of people will complain of the rather incredible $40k price tag, even if they consider themselves "green"?
We all need perspective.
Phyllis Chubb, Bowser, BC
said
Hopefully the Liberals are not supporting this foolish idea!
Andre
said
Then, it can also start flying the Air Canada planes when that company goes under.
..I guess, that's the ultimate goal...have everyone work for the government so there are no more bankrupcies!
Smart...why didn't we think of that?
Lorne
said
Free enterprise - you either sink or swim.
Give the monies to the taxpayers, who can use some assistance at this time as well. They'll put the money to good use - paying bills.
Corporations will only give the money to their executives and shareholders.
Charlie
said
How did they find money for that?
Oh, my tax return!
Dave Ontario East
said
Jon in Annapolis Valley
said
DP
said
Saladin
said
Brian
said
Dayton
said
kg1
said
i really dont get this favouritism the govt shows towards certain industries. i really just dont get it
Dave - Toronto
said
The big 3 automakers are failing for a reason. They build inferior products that the Canadian consumers,are not purchasing. Why not purchase a reliable import, which some are built in Ontario.
Why does our government continue to protect the automakers which have no long term plan to retain customers or improve the quality of their product. Now Canadian taxpayers must pay for warranties in the event of insolvency?
KJ in Kingston Ontario
said
Mike-Kingston
said
Jim in Edmonton
said
Sick of the unfairness surrounding the bailout
said
Marc - Mississauga
said
John in Vancouver
said
Doug BC
said
However,it's clear that we will go roughly the same way as the USA does.That's where both of these companies have most of their operations.It is also where most of the cars are sold.So,our options are limited.
We can calculate the cost of helping them through this period,and the cost of letting them fail.Neither is a very attractive option,but someone has to make a choice.
"Jason in Kelowna" should know that Ford has enough moeny in the bank to operate for a couple more months,but they will be in the same position very soon.
One thing is clear.It will not be business as usual no matter what comes of this.I see no way taxpayers should be expected to subsidize any of these companies beyond the period of this credit crisis.I can offer tepid support for short term help for thse companies,but there is no way in heck I am going to stand by and watch tax dollars flow from a worker making $15 per hour,so auto workers can make $32 per and have more benefits than Carter has pills.NO WAY.
At this point,I think Canada still has a chance to be a key player in the auto industry.While now is not the time to give up,there must be viable plans for success fairly soon,or the support by taxpayers will have to end.
not the fed's money our money
said
Why is it always the feds? Say it as it is honestly, and let me know that I will now have to spend less in order to afford the higher taxes I will pay.
Herb Tarlick
said
Don
said
Jimmy B - Perth Ontario.
said
Terry McBride
said
What a bunch of crap. As far as I can tell this is another good reason NOT to buy a Chrysler or GM. Your tax dollars will be paying to have your warranty work done. Some warranty! Will we ever stop paying for those Chysler and GM vehicles we bought. Bloody brilliant.
Martin.NS.
said
Enough is enough, The autosector should not recieve any more public funds. GM and Chrysler have been on a decline for many years now, this is nothing new. They had their chance to adapt to consumer demands.
The consumers have spoken, they don't want your product anymore. Why force the tax payer to pay for this? Shape up( ON YOUR OWN ) or ship off car companies.
Beth
said
Logan
said
Joanna
said
CMT
said
The money that the government is spending on the 2 auto makers (Ford did not ask for a bail out!!!!) should be used to bail out the guy/gal trying to put food on the table pay the mortgage/rent, pay the outrageous utility bills and now pay McGuinty's new tax.
God help us, cause our government isn't!
KJ in Kingston Ontario
said
Maybe we will see another line on our 2009 income tax form to include services paid for by bailout...
Line GM-101
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
Logistically, in practicum, how is a federal government going to support warranty claims if the requisite parts infrastructure for these North American brands becomes crippled, or, if, under bankruptcy, certain company model-divisions are extinguished or sold off?!
When does the bus to Bozo-Town stop? I want to get off.
The real Dave
said
Then give the CEOs and the other members of senior management, who got us in this mess, lets give them 100 million, because they have worked so hard to drive these companies into the ground and let the government pick up the pieces.
HARPER - WAKE UP and have the auto companies play by the Rules of the game...can't make, leave the table
Doug Freiday
said
All of the comments here are talking about this being a bailout of the big three. This to me is more of a bail of the man on the street who has bought a GM or Chrysler. The money is to fix their car not the company.
Joseph Hancock, Saskatchewan
said
Roger T
said
If the Gov't backs the warrantee, it makes things worst cause they can change anytime and the gov't will make it hard for anyone who has problems with the car. Given that fact that it takes the Gov't SOOOOO long to do this, why would this surprise anyone buying a car. Long waits for rebates.
The cost out weights the rebates/savings. Why put yourself in debt just to buy something that is going to devalue once off the lot.
Besides, dealers are charging for every little upgrades rather than offering it for free. The finance is just a JOKE, 0% is shorten to 3yrs rather than 5yrs. Another marketing scheme that the dealers think that all consumers are blind to read beyond their marketing tools.
Saving comes before the economy!
Tony
said
Pappy
said
Gov't grunt
said
Red X
said
The Risk is that one of the automakers WILL be going through Bankruptcy protection and the taxpayer is on the hook to bailout the failure.
Aside - Conservative party members should be forced to buy them so Flaherty and Clement don't look like they made a bad investment.
Give it to the working guys
said
1. retire completely by quitting their jobs and not seek employment(create 40 million new jobs)
2. buy a house (solve the housing crisis)
3. Buy a new car (solve the auto industry problem)
...and it will still cost less than what the US and Canada are spending on the bailouts.
slb in Salmon Arm
said
shawn
said
Alan in Vancouver
said
How totally unfair to subsidize a select group.
I'm going to buy a Hummer just so I can maximize my dip into the gravy pot.
Julie Moss from Corner Brook
said
First, you pay for a car, you pay GST/PST, gas guzzling tax, air conditioning tax, tire tax, freight, warranties. Then, more of our tax dollars given to the Big Three for bailing out their companies because of their own stupidity?
Three ways to Sunday are the taxpayers getting stiffed!
Socialism is killing us
said
Steve G
said
Very well said.
Enough ALready
said
enough is enough!
said
peter in BC
said
Cambob
said
We have a minority government which means they must have support of other parties inorder to pass legislation. Therefore, ALL parties are involved in this.
Part 2.
Since all parties are acting in collusion, the majority of Canadians are no longer represented by government.
Part 3.
Without a cohesive government, and saddled with a 72% tax rate, the Canadian population will do absolutly nothing. The few who scream will be 'greased' and the rest will be slowly enslaved.
Part 4.
With the scarcity of farmland and skyrocketing costs for food, people will begin to eat each other!
Yeah, it's a scary thought. Now hush up and pay your taxes. The Government knows what's best for you...
SorryKids
said
Dale
said
The warranty work will be performed by the same dealerships that do it now, the government is simply to guarantee they get paid, nothing really changes for the consumer.
Quality at Frod and GM has consistently improved and is now ranked some of the best in the world.
Cry, cry... protect our jobs while you people go out and buy imports, kind of like planting your neihbors garden then wondering why you have no food?
Asia continues to sell us their stuff, take all the profit, and steal the jobs...
Go to most stores and you can't find anything not made in China, you complain its crap but buy it anyway because its cheap, and then complain about lost jobs.
I think lots of people need only look in the mirror to understand our problems.
JMB
said
This scheme is essentially no warranty at all given "we" (tax payers) will pay for warranty work. The only difference is you are forcing other people to help pay for that warranty work. Where's the benefit to the consumer?
I surely won't buy a new car now because now my money will be set aside in the form of increased taxes to repair other people's vehicles.
AlbertaProud
said
dwayne-ottawa
said
steve
said
Steve the Pundit
said
- who is going to have more "confidence" to buy a vehicle from either of these manufacturers when the GOVERNMENT is backing the warranty? Having a bunch of bureaucrats managing my warranty is going to give me piece of mind? More like make me LOSE my mind!
- for most people, the warranty (or absence of) is not the "make-or-break" on ANY vehicle purchase; it's a mixture of reliability, desirability, fuel economy, performance, quality, resale value, dealer treatment... in short, all the things that customers perceive lacking from these companies (and their current market share is a direct measure of this)
- their problems are as a result of the last 3 decades, not the last 3 months; in the same way it takes a long time to ruin a reputation, it takes nearly as long to restore it. A handful of good cars and some decent quality scores isn't going to undo the perceptions that have become rooted through years of sub-standard offerings.
Let them go bankrupt and the market will figure it out; $185 million will cut a lot of unemployment cheques for displaced workers (of ANY industry, not just automotive)
social Justice
said
My tax money should not got to some dude who bought a brand new Cadillac then crashed it into his mansion.
Phillip Manuel
said
Denise Miller, Kingston NB
said
Geoff
said
PrairieDog-prairies
said
Really fed up
said
But I will still have to pay for my car rightIn other words they are allowed to break contract but not us the strung high consumer.
Cheryl in Coquitlam
said
KH
said
Every time the Obama Goverment makes a decision, there is no need to wonder what the Harper Goverment will do next...
Does Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party of Canada not have any solutions of their own other than to merely copy the Americans... it's time to get rid of Harper.
FRAUDULENT CLAIMS COMING
said
For Sale Please, Please, Please,
said
I have one 9 month young Jeep with 2,500 kilometers.It is now worth less then what I owe on it.
Imaculate condition.
P.S.
If the company goes under there will be no waranty.
Interested????
Ray Luft, Mississauga
said
help the car people
said
Tom
said
Matt
said
Yes we should have a say where our tax money goes.
I don't want my tax dollars going to ANY activity that isn't directly related to government responsibilities.
The billions of our tax dollars wasted by government on programs that they don't need is disgusting.
I don't like the government backing auto warranties.
However there is some admittedly weak justification, in that it might help stabilize the automotive industry.
How about wasting billions on the Olympics? A huge expense with no apparent benefit to the country.
DV88
said
Daniel Beauchemin
said
I STRONGLY disagree with this measure and feel it is absolutely ridiculous to see tax payers money thrown away, then again, the governments specialty is exactly that....business as usual!
Rosie
said
Rick
said
Rob
said
My second point: I have a small business (approx 2 million in sales) and I struggle to make ends meet, all the while paying my share of income taxes. My business might fall apart and fail anytime. i won't get a dime from the government because I'm not GM. They will throw me in jail though...quickly too, if I don't pay my taxes. What a country!
david sawkiw [saskatchewan farmer]
said
Ed Taxpayer
said
jeep be gone
said
Fatman
said
Joe Taxpayer
said
JP in North Saanich
said
There are doing a very good job in keeping in line with whatever the USA tell them to do and they follow like Puppies oo a string.
It took Obama 3 months to get Harper at his beck and call.
Keep it up - we will remember at the next election.
Good One Tony
said
Time to throw Harper out! Gonzo!
If Iggy doesn't do something soon to capitalize...e's also missing the bote.
Pete
said
I wondered about that too, Geoff.
said
Mac in Regina
said
The Business Section asked readers to answer the question
"How Would You Fix the Economy?"
This was the BEST idea!
Dear Mr.President,
There are about 40 million Americans over the age of 50 in the work force today. I suggest that the U.S. Treasury pay
each of them $1 million severance pay with these stipulations:
1) They leave their jobs right now. Bingo! 40 million new job openings - Unemployment fixed.
2) They must immediately buy NEW American-made cars. 40 million cars ordered - Auto Industry fixed.
3) They either buy a house or pay off their mortgage - Housing Crisis fixed
Additional benefit from paying off mortgages....the banks would have lots of extra money and wouldn't have to be
'bailed out'! Maybe theywould start making loans again!
fed up
said
Don from Ottawa
said
I am disgusted with this endless bailout buffet. Enough. It is time for these shoddy companies (and their greedy unions) to lie in the bed they have made for themselves. I resent my money being used in this manner, against my will, and will gladly endure some short-term economic pain for meaningful long-term gain.
I blame the Conservatives, but I also blame the other political parties who put this heat on them in the relentless pursuit of sound bites and votes. They are all making a bad situation worse.
Dave
said
The Feds just don't learn. YOU GUYS ARE BACKING A LOSING HORSE!! We don't need MP's to repair our cars under warranty, we need you to STOP GIVING AWAY OUR TAX DOLLARS TO THESE PAMPERED, OUT-OF-TOUCH LOSERS!! Got it?
Red X
said
Only one party is running the government and it just happens to be...
Andy Y - Vancouver
said
The saddest thing is that if GM falls, all of its R&D on electric and alternative energy vehicles goes down with them.
It was political and corporate will (or lack thereof) that kept this technology unavailable until now.
There is a reason why GM can offer the electric "Volt" car within a year while the other two are still scrambling to market hybrids and bio-fuel vehicles.
I may not be a conservative, but bailing out short sighted failure is not something I want my tax dollars spent on.
The world doesn't owe you a job or a lifestyle.
said
You people fail to compete successfully in the free market jungle, then the predators make you their next meal.
The strong always eat well.
J Murray Porcupine Plain
said
2- 32% or so of Canadians, like the ideas of neoconservatism ie:I got mine so screw you.
3- Until government in Canada and the US fear the people, as they do in most European countries , not the other way around.. we will get nothing but Corporate interest in place of policies for the people.
4 If you did not vote..SHUT YOUR YAP.. you have nothing to say of interest to those who voted.
Mar
said
And we should help the auto sector, yes they need to restructure, but do we all want to pay for the EI for all these unemployed workers? Not just the union guys, but the people that work at car dealerships, parts stores, parts manufacturers, paint and repair shops, etc etc. This goes further than just GM and Chrysler, and they are both so big that the foreign cars will take YEARS if they can ever pick up the slack (that is to those that think all these people will just get hired by or provide product for the Japanese and European carmakers), and they won't do it at the expense of their own workers. Watch what you wish for!
Political Junkie
said
The idea is to convince people it's "safe" to buy a new car.
Marg in Calgary
said
I love my car (Jeep) and want to buy it out after the lease is up. Wonder how this will effect the warranty, etc. Hope they've taken that into consideration.
ches
said
GTA
said
Dan "Entitlement" Harper in St Catharine
said
Is this the Conservatives idea of a carbon tax? Does Harper intend to rewards corporate losers ... with a golden handshake? PLEEZE.. .get a grip on your senses. Let the bums go bust.
RICK L--MONTREAL
said
Unions put these guys in a position where they can't afford to put good parts in their cars--until that changes--they cannot compete