News Sections
NATO chooses Danish PM as new leader
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(29)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sat. Apr. 4 2009 8:12 PM ET
NATO leaders ended the alliance's 60th-annivesrary summit by agreeing on a new leader and on an Afghanistan strategy that calls for more resources to train and support the Afghan National Army and police force.
During a closing press conference in Strasbourg, France, on Saturday, current NATO Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer named Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen as his replacement.
"I look very much forward to continuing the good job done by Secretary-General Scheffer in the transformation of NATO to manage the new challenges of the 21st century," Fogh Rasmussen told reporters.
The alliance appeared to overcome concerns from member nation Turkey, which objected to Fogh Rasmussen's candidacy over an incident in 2006, when he defended cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad that appeared in a Danish publication.
Member nations must reach a consensus to choose a new secretary-general.
Scheffer then outlined an agreement that NATO leaders reached that calls for "stronger Afghan ownership and stronger civilian effort" in bringing peace and stability to the war-torn country.
Earlier Saturday, France and Germany indicated that they backed U.S. President Barack Obama's new strategy for the Afghan war, but the two countries resisted requests to send more combat troops to the country.
Obama has pledged thousands more troops to the mission in Afghanistan and his administration has called on other NATO countries to follow suit.
However, European leaders -- and voters -- are wary of expanding a military effort in a country that has become mired in a growing insurgency.
Scheffer said leaders agreed to establish a so-called "NATO training mission Afghanistan," which will oversee high-level training for the Afghan National Army and for the Afghan police.
The training mission will provide trainers and mentors and will also "deploy the forces necessary" to support the upcoming Afghan elections.
"The bottom line is this," Scheffer said. "When it comes to Afghanistan, this summit and this alliance have delivered."
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the Canadian government was satisfied with the pledge of training and mentoring resources.
"I'm quite satisfied with that," Harper said during a news conference at the summit's close. "Obviously I'd like to see more, but I think that was realistically what we were going to achieve here."
Earlier Saturday, both French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel emphasized the need for Afghanistan's government and security forces to take more responsibility for the country's stability.
Rather than sending more troops, France and Germany said priority for NATO countries is providing civilian aid and training for Afghan police.
"We need to promote Afghanization," Merkel said.
The new NATO pledge backs away from a strategy that Obama outlined on Friday. He pledged 21,000 U.S. troops to the 38,000 already battling a growing Taliban insurgency.
Even though NATO declined to send more combat troops into Afghanistan, the U.S. president praised the commitment to training as "a strong down payment" toward the country's security.
Despite the differences of opinion, leaders displayed a moment of unity before the summit's second day of meetings. Merkel led two dozen NATO leaders across the Europa Bridge, which separates Germany and France.
The group met French President Nicolas Sarkozy at the halfway point and continued the trip across the bridge, a symbolic gesture that set aside the hostilities that once divided Europe.
In that spirit, Scheffer said the alliance is launching the process to update the 1999 strategic concept, a document that outlines the organization's mandate.
He said the update will be agreed upon at the next NATO summit and will "give direction" for NATO as it faces 21st-century challenges.
Scheffer also appeared to diffuse a rift over relations with Russia.
Obama had used a Saturday speech welcoming Albania and Croatia to NATO to say that the alliance should be open to the idea of welcoming even more new members. However, many NATO countries, particularly Germany and France, are wary of an eastward expansion, fearing that welcoming former Soviet Bloc countries to the alliance will damage relations with Russia.
In his closing remarks on Saturday, Scheffer said NATO must work with Russia on common security interests, such as arms control, anti-piracy and Afghanistan.
"We think that this relationship can deliver more than it has until now if all parties take the necessary steps, and we will engage Russia in that spirit," Scheffer said.
With files from The Associated Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(29)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Tono
said
Now what do you think is going to happen in the Northwest Passage?
And, for the record, what is going to happen with Hans Island, now that NATO is run by a Dane?
If Canada wants to have legitimate power in determine its future course, Canada should resign from NATO.
Concerned - SK
said
Optımısm ın AB
said
Let´s gıve the Danısh PM a chance. It sounds lıke he has some good ıdeas.
Afghan NCO veteran
said
Canada should resign from NATO?
Actually that could be to our advantage in many ways.
We must leave Afghanistan ASAP. We have acquired real good experience across the board over there.
We must build up a better National-Domestic Command (CANADACOM is failing) in which our borders, coastline and airspace are fully protected and without a doubt to anyone that it is Canadian sovereignty and property.
We have many natural resources that will make many nations envious very soon.
Because of this, our military must double in size, our procurement must also double (more fighter jets, more civil aid equipment, 12 new submarines for our coastline & Arctic protection, armed UAV for Arctic air patrols, dedicated domestic counter-terrorist force, accurate intelligence, better military presence in isolated areas, etc)
We have to set our National priorities straight.
Thanks for nothing folks
said
No kidding there Sherlock, but you need to have some sort of foundation to build on. Why not try that idea in Somalia?
To Tono...
Bang on. I can't believe I'm saying this, but with everyone 'supporting this cause' without providing troops is a waste. NATO is done.
eddytoronto
said
If this is nothing but hot air, the global economy is heading for a HUGE meltdown!
This will put the whole world into Depression. Its really make or break occasion.
The chances of the greatest depression are quite high-even if that is averted, the recession will last a very long time. Look, we are not going back to where we came from. In that sense it's going to last forever!
While most investors are worried about the sorry state of the global markets. I reckon a full-blowndepression is inevitable.
There is tremendous human suffering which is very distressing.
This once-in-a-liftime event, this crisis unlike any other. It's total collapse of the financial system with tremendous implications for every day life.
Mark -Vegreville, AB
said
Perhaps it is time for them to move on and form their own military alliance, taking with them which ever nations that share their point of view while the remaining NATO members move forward. NATO is becoming fragmented, and fragmented alliances are useless.
Eyes Wide Open-Saskatoon
said
As for the new head of NATO. I think it is a great choice. The Danes have been there with Canada and have stood by this mission with unwavering support. Great choice. However, I fear that NATO is on it's last legs. There are countries that are waiting for that to happen. I do hope another "organization" will be formed to take it's place. We need it to protect the western world from rogue nations and extremists.
Niagara George
said
Canada resign from NATO? Sure, and we will stand alone against the USA, Denmark, Norway, Russia and anyone else who claims to have ownership rights in the North.
Isn't it interesting that the ones whose countries have been filled with war, are the very ones who seek alternate resolutions? For once, please consider that someone else might have a better understanding of the situation than we do.
Forget doubling. We could increase by 10x's and we would still be a little troop, compared to the big boys.
CF Afghan Vet
said
By leaving NATO, Canada would be shunned by our allies, both militarily and politically. It is these types of commitments (NATO/NORAD/UN/G8) that allows Canada the political influence it needs. Without them, Canada would have to rely on decisions that may not be in the best interest of Canadians.
CF Afghan Vet
said
eddytoronto
said
How about Canadians rights - anti terrorism Bill C-36. It's ok for Harper to shout about rights of Afghans while quietly destroying Canadian freedoms and rights. Lucky Afghans to have Harper batting for their rights including housing, guns, money - thanks to Cdn taxpayers.
eddytoronto
said
Can someone explain why Mr. MacKay has been quietly campaigning to be NATO's secretary-general and, thanks to the surprise backing of the Barack Obama administration, is no longer thought a long shot.
Mr. MacKay must distance himself from his recession-battered party, sagging in the polls, and get out from under the heavy controlling hand of Mr. Harper to establish an independent identity.
Being NATO's secretary-general is a glory gig based in Brussels and usually goes to a European. The four-year-term job requires the chosen one to speak on behalf of the NATO partners, chair a few committees and mingle with senior diplomats and military brass while living the lavish life.
He had, for example, promised to deliver a bonanza of shipbuilding activity to the region even before the Conservatives embraced huge deficit spending.
Add military mission headaches, Conservative political stagnation and an under-whelming ministerial performance and it explains why the NATO appointment buzz is such a gift for Mr. MacKay.
For Peter MacKay, who still needs to complete the transformation from that sad spectacle of his teary potato patch photo op after a breakup with former MP Belinda Stronach to genuine frontrunner for the Conservative crown, the NATO appointment would be the perfect rescue mission.
Applying international polish to any politician's resume never hurts. Just ask Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff, who has emerged unscathed from three decades as an academic and media celebrity abroad.(Ignatieff was not in Canada for 25years)
Being a U. S.-backed candidate gives his name some global gloss, even though it's considered to be payback to Canada for the supreme sacrifices of its Afghanistan combat mission.
serktheturk
said
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
"...Scheffer said the alliance is launching the process to update the 1999 strategic concept, a document that outlines the organization's mandate."
___________________
Allow me to prescribe a "new" mandate for NATO:
To be a cohesive and unified alliance capable of actually making REAL contributions to matters affecting members.
To cease being a group of obstinate back-patting phonies hooked on wine and cheese who occasionally gather for photo opportunities to portray a relevance and usefulness to citizens of the homeland.
To pay better attention to the statements and actions of global terrorists, and understand that terrorism isn't just America's problem for the future.
To remember that, once upon a time, not long ago, Uncle Sam helped save the butts of certain European members in their "darkest hour" and, therefore, America deserves more than empty and shameful lip-service from NATO.
To stop allowing certain European members to continue pretending that they give a genuine damn about the plight of less fortunate people in other countries, despite the warm embrace of liberalism and socialism by said members.
For ALL members to become more than just self-impressed talkers on issues, and appreciate the profound socioeconomic "global" bond members must share.
John E
said
RICHIE
said
Nancy- Ezra Levant Charged - Great Dane Promoted?
said
The President of the country that orignially published them ends up as defender of the free world.
Jim: Canada Earned this Position
said
Canada as the defenders of human rights and prepared to back it up should of been given this post.
Sandra Toronto, Ont
said
Justin in Toronto
said
Sue The World Stops When Harper Pees
said
Joshua Lethbridge, AB
said
nato is needed more than ever.
Europe isn't relevant
said
Wade- Ignatieff Involvement Hurt Canada
said
He should go back to the USA
Cal: 10 years of Liberal Darkness Over
said
But after the 10 years of darkenss under the Liberals our military is still in need of the Helicopters the Liberals Canceled.
But Prime Minister Harper sure has the respect of the World and to his credit so does McKay.
Jan - Liberals days of Pretending are Over
said
PepperPot
said
Garry in NS
said