News Sections
Russia hits back at Canada about bomber flights
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(159)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. Feb. 27 2009 10:56 PM ET
Moscow hit back at Defence Minister Peter MacKay on Friday, calling the minister's comments about the flight of two Russian bombers a "farce," the Russian news agency Ria Novosti reported Friday.
The rhetorical sparring comes after two long-range Russian bombers flew near Canadian airspace in the arctic less than 24 hours before President Barack Obama visited Ottawa on Feb. 19 - an occurrence which MacKay called a "strong coincidence."
Two Canadian CF-18 fighters intercepted the Russian aircraft and MacKay warned Russia on Friday to "back off" from flying near the Canadian border.
The incident has ignited a fierce debate about territorial sovereignty as European nations, Canada and the U.S. squabble about claims in the arctic.
But Russia sent a clear response to MacKay's warnings.
"The Canadian defense minister's statements concerning the flights of our long-haul aircraft are totally unclear," a Russian military source said Friday, adding that the flight was routine.
"The countries adjacent to the flight path had been notified and the planes did not violate the airspace of other countries. In this light the statements by the Canadian Defense Ministry provoke astonishment and can only be called a farce," the source told Ria Novosti.
At a press conference Friday, Defence Minister Peter MacKay said the incident happened on Feb. 18.
"At no time did Russian airplanes enter Canadian airspace but within 24 hours of the president's visit here to Canada last week we did scramble two CF-18 fighter planes from Norad (North American Aerospace Defense Command) and Canada command," MacKay said.
The jets took off from Cold Lake, Alta., to intercept the aircraft, which has been reported as either a Tupolev Tu-95 bomber or its newer sister, the Tu-160.
"They met a Russian aircraft that was approaching Canadian airspace and, as they have done on previous occasions, they sent very clear signals that are understood that that aircraft was to turn around, turn tail, and head back to its own airspace -- which it did," MacKay said.
CTV's Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife said the plane was intercepted about 190 km northeast of Tuktoyaktuk, N.W.T.
"Obviously what they were doing was testing Canadian security knowing full well that all of our security attention would be focused in Ottawa around the president's visit," Fife said.
MacKay said similar incidents have happened in the past. However, he said the frequency of the incidents is increasing.
"For that reason, it puts the emphasis back on the importance of Norad, the importance of our being diligent in defending our airspace, exercising that sovereignty," he said.
"The most obvious way to do that is by using the equipment at our availability, using the existing systems that are there at Norad for this very purpose."
MacKay was in Ottawa Friday meeting with Gen. Walter Natynczyk, Canada's chief of defence staff, and Gen. Gene Renuart, the commander of Norad and USNORTHCOM, to discuss Canada-U.S. military relations.
Renaurt said it was vital that Canada and the U.S. maintain "the solid, integrated air defence posture that we have."
Political fallout widens
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Russian intrusions are a "real concern" to his government.
"We will continue to respond, we will defend our airspace," Harper told reporters in Saskatoon.
A Russian air force spokesman said Friday that the flight was planned in advance and was part of routine patrols.
Canadian navy Lt. Desmond James, a spokesman at Norad headquarters in Colorado Springs, Colo., told The Canadian Press that the Russians include long-range flights as part of their training.
"On our part, we go up to make sure they know that while they are doing their training, we do know that they're there and we are watching, prepared to respond should they decide that they're going to alter their course in a threatening manner," James said.
"We have to let the Russians -- any aircraft -- know that we are in a position to respond."
Norad spokesperson Michael Kucharek said it is not atypical to see Russian aircraft engaging in training exercises so close to Canadian airspace.
"This has happened quite often, this is a pattern that we generally see through Russian exercises of this type," he told CTV Newsnet on Friday afternoon.
He estimated that Norad had seen Russian fighters undertaking similar training exercises at least 20 times "over the course of the last couple of years."
During the Cold War, Russian aircraft frequently entered into North American airspace and were often escorted back to international air space by Canadian and American jets.
Brewing international dispute
After the Soviet Union collapsed, the flights were suspended but have resumed in recent years as Russia tries to push its claim on the Arctic.
In total, five countries claim parts of region -- Russia, Canada, Norway, Denmark, and the United States.
Canada has claimed the Northwest Passage.
"The Russians have been very strict about following international rules but they're going right up to the limits," Rob Huebert, with the University of Calgary's Centre for Military and Strategic Studies, told CTV Newsnet Friday.
"If in fact we see the Americans pushing us on the Northwest Passage and ultimately somehow it becomes accepted that it's an international strait I would suspect you'd be seeing Russian bombers coming through the Northwest Passage."
Last summer, then-foreign affairs minister David Emerson said recent actions of Russia in the Far North were of "great concern" to the government.
He said Canadian officials had "seen much increased activity in terms of Russian overflights of Canadian airspace."
Emerson also said the Americans were seeing the same thing around Alaska.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(159)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Alanna, from Saskatchewan
said
Barry in Ottawa
said
Greg - Signs and Wonders
said
Let it go !
Bryce Jeffcoat
said
Mike
said
Unfortunately, we will all suffer from the fact that the US now is lead by the weakest, most inexperienced leader ever in world history. Incidents like this military incursion will become more frequent and severe.
KJ in Kingston Ontario
said
Kevin
said
Mike G
said
As much as it would be nice to trust the Russians you have to remember they have their own agenda. They want to expand there countries territorial claims.
We have to set up better defense in the arctic and focus on our sovereignty there.North America should work together on securing the arctic.
Brad
said
Do you know how many fighter aircraft are over Afghanistan at any one time? Believe me, there is more then enough air cover over there....
Dan
said
This should be a warning to those of us in North America as well. As Thomas Jefferson said: "A government big enough to supply you with everything you need, is a government big enough to take away everything that you have...."
Bruce
said
Just sit down and think about it people, its not that hard. Honeslty, look at what Russia did in Georgia last year, or did you forget about that already.
Gerald from Belleville
said
Our North holds VAST economic, mineral, and energy potential. In the coming years, the North will become crucial to our economic development and sustainability.
Precedence and even international law gives us exclusive rights to much of this...the only right granted to other nations is the right of passage, not economic exploitation of these resources.
But we only get to keep these resources if we take a stand NOW. Scandinavian countries along with Russia have a tremendous interest in these resources, and while they won't risk overt military action at this time, they will try to gradually erode our sovereignty: a few bombers here, a few weather stations here and there, a flag on this island, an "expedition", ...and don't you know it, by virtue of the fact that we've ignored it, they will now have a legit claim to those territories.
We need to show them that when push comes to shove, we are willing to shove. Doesn't matter that our shoving can't push them over: our pushing guarantees our continued legitimate claim over those territories. Taking over those territories by other countries then becomes an act of war, to be responded to by our allies. But if we don't contest it, then no one will come to our help after the fact.
Protect our North. It is resource rich and has much to give us...is it's still ours. And to those eco- sensitives out there...who would you rather be in charge of the North? Canada, or Russia?
Where was USAF on Sept. 11, 2001?
said
Russian aircraft was not in Canadian airspace, so there was no "Red Alert! Red Alert!"
This is more ridiculous noise to raise the anxiety level for the US deadhead masses--not to mention certain Canadian masses.
Chris Jenkins
said
Russian long range TU-95 bombers frequently fly along the arctic border airspace...to intentionally convey military posture and to seek a reaction from Canadian Forces (a method of ascertaining reaction capabilities). Similar flights have occurred that come over the pole and down the East Coast to Cuba...I have no doubt those flights will begin again as well.
Blame our (the west's) insatiable thirst for oil as Russia rebuilds it's economy based on the abundant oil of Northern Russia and soon; the Arctic.
New World
said
Can Germany be trusted? Can the USA be trusted? Tell me exactly how you come to the conclusion as to who can be trusted and who cannot? Is it a facial expression? Is it past actions? Is it nationality? Is it what they buy off you? Is it Political Ideology? Is it language? Or do you judge who you can trust and who you can't by watching James Bond movies or anything that comes American run media?
Think before commenting and calling others misguided… you are the misguided one. How many American Military Aircraft fly over Canadian Airspace with no response from our military? Are they to be trusted?
Sean
said
You have a total of 80 CF-18. A dumb'd down version of the F-18A Super Hornet. WE have more than that at one base in Alaska protecting Canada from the Big Bad Bullys in Russia. So that your Governement and most of your citizens (granted, not all) can sit back and blame America for all of the worlds ills. The Russian were sure as H&LL testing our new "Comrade in Chief". They see him as weak, so get used to this type of news. It will become regular fodder over the next 4 years.
Steve in Ottawa
said
The CF-18 simply could not fly that distance, intercept and escort the Russian bomber for a few minutes, and then fly back ANOTHER 2,300 km.
Rather, the CF-18 was launched, and in the air somewhere over northern Canada should an incursion occur.
PS: Our air force no longer has an airborne tanker. In-flight refuelling is virtually non-existent in our armed forces.
Steve in Montreal
said
brad Panassow
said
Dunny from Manotick
said
JKF
said
Such flights are very damaging to the environment, they can add thousands of tons of carbon to the air, in an ecologically frail Arctic, over a period of a year; they endanger people's lives, because accidents can occurr; are a total waste of money, which would be better spent by the Russian government in improving the livelyhoods of millions of Russian citizens living in very poor conditions; they are a sign of aggression by the Russian leadership against Canadians; they portray the Russian goverment badly, because such actions are a throwback to the old communist criminal dictatorship days that murdered and tortured millions of innocent Russian citizens, for which no one has been held accountable for; and worse of all will end up triggering another arms race, which the world does not need, given that 100ths of millions of people on the planet are living in utter misery, and the money spent in an arms race could be far better spent helping the poor of the world.
The perception of the Russian goverment's will grow negatively by the day, when it authorizes, people whose minds have been dulled by years of alcohol abuse, to plan and execute such regressive operations which are destabilizing in nature and counter to peace.
Mr. Putin, get rid of the intoxicated idiots, that have advised you to authorize such operations! Use the money you save in helping people in your own country or in places like Africa.
The CF-18s must have had STUNT pilots.
said
Mel from Calgary
said
Too bad our government wants to continue fighting the cold war.
Now that Russia is a new democracy, a northern country and a world power also on our border we should work toward a strong relationship to help counter our over-reliance on the U.S.
Canada and Russia have a lot to offer each other.
Budget Cuts In The Name of Political Expediency
said
charles-sherbrooke
said
Mark Jeffcoat (Bryce's dad)
said
annie ontario
said
Ted from NY
said
David
said
totaljustice
said
M. Cameron
said
Al B Chicago, IL
said
Bill on a Canadian Navy Ship
said
Harper and MacKay desperate to look useful.
said
MacKay made it sound as if we just prevented a all out war or an attempted assassination on the president!
The interviewer tried every which way to make it seem a big deal,but the official would not budge. He just kept saying that it wasn't all that important or news worthy! It was actually funny to listen to the reporter try to make a big thing out of this,but the guy wasn't biting.
The Harper Government will try anything to distract the people from our real problems.
Rhonda
said
Breakstuff
said
Jeff
said
We in the States understand that after 8 years of failed, bullying, foreign policy led by a deserter and a proponent of torture that we have a long way to go to win back the trust and leadership roll we once held. Now if we can just persevere past the crushing debt and failed policies of the past 8 years of US leadership we will be well on our way.
Hu Rah and thanks to the military for their service.
Armand
said
Alex in Trenton
said
No AR tankers in Canada???
Look up 435 Squadron in Winnipeg.
Jack
said
Dave - Fredericton
said
Phil from PEI
said
Gee
said
Rick
said
Ken in NWT
said
The Tu-95 had plenty of time to launch it's cruise missiles to take out a couple of subs in Seattle and the Calgary Saddledome if it had targeted them.
Jim in the West
said
Alex (Toronto)
said
Canada has to retain capability to respond to airspace threats and also has to maintain and improve defense cooperation with the United States.
KWY
said
Brian, New York, NY
said
Bill
said
Way to go.
As in nature bears don't like hornets.
Fine job.
Lisa
said
And then there's the recession! Well so much for that Idea!
Tom, Kettle Falls
said
Dirk Diggler
said
Sean: The proper call out for the Super Hornet is F-18E/F.
Steve: Canada has air-to-air re-fueling capabilities from (2)CC-150 Polaris and (5)CC-130 Hercules.
Mark Jeffcoat: Canada does NOT have any CF-18 in Afghanistan...none!
Buba
said
US jets from Alaska would have had the Russians covered long before the Canucks got there and the Bear is so old and obsolete that Obama was out of the country before it would have reached Ottawa anyway.
More smoke and mirrors from a government with nothing to brag about.
Abdula from Ottawa
said
That goes out to all those wandering American ships up there too.
Canada is the TRUE NORTH STRONG AND FREE. That means we own the North.
russ
said
Kris k.
said
Thanks for being so tough.
As someone already noted, the U.S. has more firepower protecting your silly butts in one Alaskan Airbase than you have in your entire "air force."
The United States chose foolishly in the last election, and we're stuck with the results. So are you. Russia will be knocking on your door for at least the next four years. A lot of people will.
For the first time ever, Canada might actually have to put on her big boy pants and do something meaningful.
rich
said
Roland in Chicago
said
Doug BC
said
No matter how much we try to take a role in NORAD,NATO,or any other military operation,some bonehead has to beak off about how "we,the USA" are in charge here."We,the "USA" are here to take control of this situation."We.the USA" are the biggest and the best,so please get out of the way.
There was a day a couple of decades ago when a commander of a USA navy ship actually stood on a dock in Vancouver after a demonstration by Greenpeace and told reporters "we" could blow your whole coutry off the map".
No,I don't trust the Russians.And frankly,I don't trust the Chinese either.But it's blowhards and jingoist morons in the USA make me very concerned about whether or not the USA can be trusted either.
Well Sean,my American friend,if your country is not interested in friends and allies,please,just have President Obama relay that message to our Prime Minister so we can stop trying to be the nice neighbour in the north and look elsewhere for friends and allies somewhere else.
And,for the record,I am quite pro America,and am busy trying to elect governments that realize that we should do more in NATO,NORAD,and emergencies around the world.Fools like you make our work a lot harder,and create anti USA sentiment.
You may be American,but you are also one of the reasons America has such an ugly image in the world.If the USA wants to keep poking Canada in the eye,don't be surprised if the day comes when anti Americanism becomes the majority view in Canada,rather than the minority it is now.
Mark
said
Pip
said
To those who say "ignore them", I say that the next step would be sea-borne incursions, with possible landings, just as the Danish Navy did a couple of years ago. And THAT would set them up for territorial claims.
Am I to assume that those posters objecting to the actions of our defence team do not believe in "our True North strong and free", and that they do not "stand on guard for thee", our great nation of Canada?
Joel Bain
said
RT
said
KC
said
JED
said
Cornelia
said
Walter in Ajax
said
DJ
said
Oh and as for flying the 2300 km I'm sure that NORAD saw the Russian Bears take off and had the CF-18's in the air with tanker support should they start to get close to our airspace. Don't think they waited until the "Bears" were a couple hundred km away to get them in the air and get them to the Arctic Circle. Because of 9-11 there are always armed CF-18’s in the air.
I'm also sure that the USAF had planes in the air as well.
As for the comment form our brother to the south about these being "dumbed" down Super F-18's. Sorry that our government does not have the bottomless money pit that your government seems to have. All our planes are F-18 A's and B's that yes came out in the early 80's and 90's. They are all still in great flying condition and will likely be replaced in the next decade or so with F-35 JSF. That said they still fly and are still capable of defending our country.
Matt in Victoria
said
"everyone is not looking to take your toys away"
JEP
said
Tim from Calgary
said
Military
said
M. Cameron
said
RobM
said
These fighters are getting old, but are still very capable aircraft.
Congrats to the AF for a successful intercept.
RVH
said
Chad in slave lake, alb
said
Also to have a strong voice on the world you must have have a strong military.
P.S. How does Canada come out of a recession - get Qub. to build you planes, NFL to build you boat, and the people that were building truck in ONT. to build tanks. Instead of giving other country millions for things we can do ourselves. All a sudden you steel workers working, Parts people moving parts, and your people have money...
MaineRussian
said
Bucks
said
You would be wrong. The canadian forces do have air to air refueling capabilities in the CC-130 hercules the trusted work horse of the air force since 1960.
Al
said
Average Guy
said
Delta One Niner
said
You have a total of 80 CF-18. A dumb'd down version of the F-18A Super Hornet. WE have more than that at one base in Alaska protecting Canada from the Big Bad Bullys in Russia.>>>
There are no Hornets based in Alaska. The Super Hornet (F/A-18E)is newer and larger than the original F/A-18A Hornet. 80 fighter aircraft on one base??? I never saw nowhere that number of fighters either at Elmendorf or Eilson.
Par, from MTL
said
merna
said
Sovereignty Soldier
said
dog
said
Capt D. (ret'd)
said
Dirk: Well presented! At least someone out there knows what they're talking about.
Wait for it... the Russians will make more of these long range training flights in the coming spring months. This is normal. This happens every year. The Canadian Press reports this every year too. This should be no surprise to anyone. Has anything bad ever happened to us? No. We are at peace with them and we intend to remain at peace. So let the Russians train their aircrews, and let the good people in the NORAD/NORTHCOM system do the work they've trained to.
Sleep tight Canada, it's all under control.
Per Ardua Ad Astra!
Cambob
said
The only difference is both neighbors have nuclear weapons and a policy of mutually assured destruction.
Linda in Vancouver
said
BUT,if Canada is to small for the USA to be interested in,if our fiscal capacity cannot help bail out their economy,if our population to small to generate the kind of power they need from their friends,if the price of friendship with the USA is our sovereignty or our submission, or if they prefer friends who fear them rather than actually like them,I wish they would show enough honesty and integrity to just say so.If they did,we could stop wasting out time trying to build a stronger North America through a more cooperative relationship between our countries.
I love Americans.The people are great,which is why I travel there a lot.But I also grow weary of the way their government,and people like Sean p**s all over us every time they get a chance.
Yes Sean,the USA can crush this country.Please,if that is your desire,just do it and get it over with.I love my country just as much as you love yours.I'll go down just like the people at the Alamo before I surrended Canadian sovereignty to anyone on the planet.If we are not powerful enough,or our determination to remain sovereign makes us unworthy of the friendship of the USA,perhaps China is a better option for you.
We want to do our share,but we will not be bullied.For that,you will have crush us,thus showing the world a side of the USA that no one wants to believe exists.
Barry in Ottawa
said
Gord
said
northof60
said
Craig
said
Gord
said
DB
said
Paul R.
said
Our CF-18's may be old but they are lethal. As others mentioned here (some of you have some good facts to back up your statements)our jets are flying with updated avionics and weapons systems. Nothing wrong with that. Obviously we are not the USAF but we are good at what we do and have earned the respect of our Air Force peers around the world.
Now to address a rather silly bunch of comments about Obama; no, Steve, he his not weak or unprepared. Do not think anyone, excepts for two term VP's , are truly ready for the White House. I suspect you are one of the many that believed GWB was in some way magically prepared to become President? He hardly knew anything about the rest of the world. He was sold to the American people and his first months in office seems to be a vacation for him until 9/11.
Thankful Canuck - Downtown Canada
said
Tori
said
That is exactly what I was thinking.
This is not protectionism it is called patriotism. It is making sure Canadian Companies come first. Making sure Canadian workers are employed.
KC you go ahead and be embarassed.
If you really want to be embarrased look up the ratio of country size to military might. Now, that is embarassing.
Our military is the 55th largest in the world. Our country is the 2nd largest.
The country with the largest military is China followed by the USA, India and North Korea then Russia. The USA is the 3rd largest country in the world, Russia is the largest. China is 4th, Brazil is 5th. See the relevance? Out of the top 10 largest countries only Austrailia has a smaller military than we do.
We,as the second largest country, who has an abundance of natural resources that will be sought, should be in the top 5 as far as our military size and might.
This is good practice for our military. They get to improve their reaction time and we show the other countries that we will defend our borders.
As these attempted fly overs increase we will have a country wishing the government had of listened to the former CDS and increased our military and it's equipment.
DJ, nice you set the record straight with our friend in Alaska.
Good point Bruce.
Gerald, all the more reason to build up our military.
Anyone thinking because Canada is a peace loving country is not going to be intruded upon is living in a dream world.
We have what many countries don't, fresh water, oil, minerals, diamonds, unspoiled land, we have it all and eventually someone is going to want to take it.
Bill
said
whatever
said
You should really check up on your information!!! You are absolutley wrong on this. Canada has air to air refueling, and several operating locations in the North for Jet operations. I've been there several times as a member of the Armed Forces, and this happens all the time. Most of you have nothing better to do than find anything negative to say about the Armed Forces regardless of what it is. Just remember it is the Soldiers of the Armed Forces that fought for and protect those rights that allow you to say what you want.
Rhonda Pick Enderby
said
Emanuel, from NYC
said
I understand your positions. I am a native New Yorker, born and raised in Manhattan. I've grown up with a good sense of where the U.S. is in the world.
- Canada is the largest trading partner that we in the U.S. have. Not the U.K., not Germany, not Japan, but Canada. it is UNWISE for the U.S. to have any kind of
relationship with Canada this is not built on the triple foundations of respect, commerce, and cooperation.
- if the U.S. somehow annexed canada’s territories, the armed forces would be so overwhelmed by defending 5000+ miles of coastline and deployment overseas. That is disastrous. Understand, this is just looking at things from a logistical perspective.
-Antagonizing canada to the extent where the borders are patrolled would put enormous strain on the border patrol. We share the longest undefended border in the world. Imagine the American/Canadian taxpayer burden for subsidizing its defense.
-Proximity of our two countries: it is our best interest to make sure Canada has the means to defend itself. the 1st and only foreign power in history to invade and burn down Washington D.C. came from Canada
I know Sean’s comments drew response from Doug and Linda. I tried to illustrate U.S.-Canadian relations are simply built on mutually intertwined prosperity, and mutually dependent defense. There're plenty of people here in the U.S. that know the importance of Canada. Yes, Canada's military is quite small.
And yes, from the war of independence to September 11, the American military has
grown to be as vast as it is. Ours is a war-like nation. That is our nature, experience, and even motive, from the country's literal birth to today.
And when you have a reputation like that it is very, very dangerous to have no friends.
Rob Levar
said
TO JEP
said
"Little does anyone know that our F18's have NOTHING to shoot down any planes with! What are the pilots going to do, ram them?"
JEP, have a look at the picture of the Hornet and the Bear. What do you think those things on the wingtips and belly of the Hornet are? Here's a hint...they are air-to-air missiles used to engage enemy aircraft.
It's surprising the nonsense that is being posted on here. All I can say is Canadian Fighter Pilots risk their lives on those intercept missions. Regardless of what you think of having Russians coming near our airspace, at least be thankful that there are professionals willing to lay it all down to defend your way of life. To all you disbelievers, just say thanks and be on your way...
Canada needs IRBMs and cruise missiles
said
True North, Strong and Free!
Free of US imperialist tyranny.
TO ROB LEVAR
said
jimmy-vic
said
DP - Kansas USA
said
From poutine to Putin.....
said
Alan Berg
said
such unclera coments but our officials "we will defend our air space" we will defend ourselves against terrorists, blah blah blah....
Not EVEN canadian intellectuals know what we are really doing in afghanistan, yet we keep hearing we are protecting oruselves against terroists...give it up people please...start thinking..just because canada is full of food and supplies doesn't mean we should eat our chicken wing, bear and not question anything our govt says..
Goldens
said
John W
Bridgetown NS
richard
said
Allan Eizinas
said
It is but yet another example of why our Foreign Affairs department has to take back the foreign affairs portfolio from the military.
Ralph in nb
said
Hunter
said
Dr. Strangelove
said
James Halifax
said
On the other hand, if you are a nation that has started to rely mainly on your oil exports, as Russia does, and those same exports are down to $40 US per barrel as opposed to $140 per barrel, what could you do to change the situation?
Easy...manufacture a crisis or foment some strife. Cause problems in the middle East, start a little war now and then...the possibility is endless.
The Russians can't manufacture a storm to threaten oil refineries in the Gulf of Mexico, or off Newfoundland, but they can start some little wars in oil-producing nations. Maybe provide IRAN with some knowledge about nukes...and wait for Israel to respond, thereby causing oil prices to rise. Invade Georgia, cut off supplies to the Ukraine. That sort of thing.
It's not rocket science, in fact it is the exact opposite. Beautiful in its simplicity. Why fly over the Arctic? The same Reason Canada needs to exert some control.....control means ownership. UN be damned.
Jimmy B. - Cold Lake Alberta
said
GWinnipeg
said
Surely you don't hold a tight belief that Canada only has 2 fighter jets. Save your sarcasm for when you have something humourous to say.
MN
said
CDN Patriot
said
As for the rest of it, we will always have your backs.
Bob in Texas
said
Sid in MTL
said
It would and should come as no surprise that they could also have a boomer hiding under the ice in our North West Passage.....and there is absolutely no way that we could ever detect it until the ice thaws.
While I am glad to see that our Hornets paid the bomber a visit, I would have been more comfortable if we had a couple of Eagles up there just in case they had a Fulcrum or two hanging around in support of that bomber. Our Hornets are no match for the likes of the Fulcrum.
Putin (a.k.a. KGB Boss) is not to be trusted. The Russian Bear remains a force to reckon with in the near future.
Gary Wilson
said
Terry in Kelowna
said
canuck
said
Walt the Duke
said
tim
said
Dave NS
said
Yes, Canada has an Air Force, and yes, you're ignorant.
Walt the Duke
said
Reality check
said
What's the problem with people who fall-in so easily in line behind their politicians without a single thought even to the consistency or even sense of what these politicans say, nevermind its validity, truth obvious sensationalization? Nothing! That's human nature and the politicians love it as a tool to serve their agenda.
But let's review what has been said. 1) The Russians perform these fly-overs regulary. 2) They notify us before they do. 3) We send out our flier boys to counter them regulary. 4) The most recencent fly-by was on the eve of Obama's visit. 5) Only then does the media frenzie begins!
If it wasn't contageous, they wouldn't call it 'mass' hysteria!
Bill Smith S.S.M.
said
Aaron
said
Ki-Som Victoria BC
said
Goldens
said
Cheeky Bob! Cheeky!
JoeRJoe
said
Rick in NB
said
The puffin a true member of the Great White North.
Herb
said
FreakAlert
said
stevo
said
Can you honestly say that the world is safer today than 25 years ago?
P.S. I'm impressed that we could scramble two CF-18's at the same time. What was protecting the rest of Canada?
Don from Ottawa
said
mike campbell
said
Kostas Montreal
said
mike campbell
said
American in Nanaimo
said
I believe that Canada is a great country because of its similarities to the United States and not because of its differences. You shouldn't have to knock us down to feel good about yourselves.
Walt the Duke
said
raven48
said
Murray from Calgary
said
L.A.
said
kris from toronto
said
Are you kidding me?
MM
said
Dona
said
DC in AB
said
We as Canadian's need to assert our sovereignty from whomever may be infringing upon it. Russia is not the Russia we knew in the 90's after the collapse of the USSR. They under Vladimir Putin are moving back towards their old ways. While those flights have been "normal" in the last few years, we do have an obligation under NORAD and as a sovereign country to show them that we see them. This happens frequently and our "18's" bounce them regularly -- its just that this is being reported because a head of state was headed to our country.
Joseph from Cold Lake
said
It's quite obvious you know nothing about our air force. They do indeed still have air to air refuelling. It happens more often then you think.
No the jets couldn't go 2300kns without fuel, but certainly did have air to air support while they get to the Beaufort Sea.
We shouldn't trust any country, Russia or the US. We have to have our own interest and not get to relaxed with any of our so called friends.
cadguy
said
peter
said
Kyle
said
Some posters need to stop dipping into the blind rhetoric and get the facts straight before posting.
Algonquin Girl
said
Well - let's remember the Inuit have been there for thousands of years... um, don't THEY have any say in who runs up there?
Maybe it's time the government of Canada start allowing native people to control the lands that they have been stewards of for generations upon generation. There's no disputing that, is there?
Peter in Edmonton
said
"Ewww I didnt know Canda had an air force...hardy-har-har".
Oh well then I guess you're plain stupid then aren'tcha? Just can't stand to see even a simple story about an ally doing something...I guess you're just that childish. Now go play with your GI-Joes.
To the other Americans who came here with a thumbs up: no problem. No one's looking for a medal here. We're glad we were there to do it.
But for the whiners and chiders you might want to review Afghanistan: All of NATO countries are represented there but only 3 are facing the same level of danger and are willing to fight at all: The US, Canada and Britain (oh sorry - also Assuies). France has a HUGE armed force and deployments all over the world but they won't lift a rifle in Afghanistan. So you can go ahead and make fun of us but I think the huge armed force that won't fight is more pathetic than the small under-equipped force that will.