Canada -
News Sections
Harper ready to work with Obama on green policies
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(64)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. Feb. 18 2009 10:03 PM ET
Prime Minister Stephen Harper says he's found a partner in Barack Obama when it comes to green policies, on the eve of the president's arrival in Ottawa.
Harper defended his environmental record Wednesday on CNN, going so far as to blame former president George W. Bush for blocking efforts to fight climate change, and said Obama looks to be a much more willing partner.
"We've been trying to do so in an integrated economy when the United States has not been willing to do so. I think quite frankly that we have the present administration that wants to see some kind of regulation in this is an encouragement," Harper said Wednesday.
But environmentalists say that Harper is only acting now because Obama has made a number of green moves only weeks into his presidency.
Mike Hudema of Greenpeace told CTV News that his organization has seen more positive environmental signs in the "first three weeks of Obama than in three years of a Harper legacy."
Obama and Harper are expected to start the framework for negotiations for a common North American strategy to cut greenhouse gas emissions.
Environment Minister Jim Prentice said that the two countries need to "to clean up the way we produce energy whether its coal or oil sands or other forms of hydro carbon."
But there are worries among the Canadian oil sector because the Obama administration has said it wants to cut down on "dirty oil," which may include Alberta's oil sands. That topic is expected to come up Thursday.
Harper issues warning
Harper also issued dire warning that U.S. protectionism could turn a recession into a depression Wednesday.
He said that any effort to close the U.S. border to trade would be a "huge risk to the world."
Harper also made mention of a topic he doesn't want to discuss with Obama - reopening the North America Free Trade Agreement to debate.
He said reopening NAFTA could mean never-ending re-negotiations. Obama raised fears of re-negotiating NAFTA during his campaign for president, but has since then quietly backed off that initiative.
Obama's talk of reopening NAFTA was believed to be mostly aimed at Mexico, but Harper said that even by putting one part of the agreement under the microscope could put the entire deal in jeopardy.
When asked by CNN's Wolf Blitzer about what advice he could give the U.S. on the economy, Harper declined to do so.
But he did tout Canada's strong banking system and said that his country's economic issues were nowhere near as significant as the U.S.'s.
'Fruitful' discussion expected
Harper said he expects to have "fruitful" discussions tomorrow with U.S. President Barack Obama on the economy, international affairs, the environment and energy issues.
"All of those things along with the border, the great border we share that is obviously the transitway for the largest trade flows in history -- those will all be very important topics we will be discussing," Harper told CTV Toronto in an interview that aired Tuesday night.
Obama's much-anticipated visit will also be the first international state trip he has made since his inauguration, and thousands of people are expected to gather on Parliament Hill in hopes of seeing him.
"I'm hoping it will be the beginning of many fruitful discussions between the two of us and obviously between our governments," Harper said.
Obama and Harper are expected to talk about the recent developments in the struggling auto sector and how their respective governments will respond.
Charles Doran, director of Canadian Studies at John Hopkins University, told CTV Newsnet that North America's integrated auto sector requires an integrated governmental response.
"They want to be sure they don't get in each other's way (with an auto bailout), they want to be sure there isn't a lot of resistance on each side in terms of protectionism," Doran said Wednesday. "A lot of things need to be discussed to make this work."
Doran said that Obama's visit will demonstrate a significant change in foreign policy from the previous U.S. administration.
"What we see here is a difference in tone. This is a new administration in the U.S. that takes the position that Canada and other countries are part of world order . . . and (Obama's) government is listening," he said.
Obama visit excites Canadians, Harper included
Even though Obama's visit will be brief and crammed with official events, busloads of well-wishers are expected to come from Montreal, Toronto and Kitchener, Ont.
Groups plan to line the fenced-in lawn at Parliament Hill as well as the route Obama's motorcade will follow. Also, a "Yes We Span" march is planned for the Laurier bridge.
Harper's staff were anxious this week to point out that the two leaders have a lot in common, saying they are similar in age, both have young families and neither had been in elected office for long when they became their nation's leader.
"They really, at a basic level, have quite a bit in common," Harper spokesman Kory Teneycke told The Canadian Press, pointing out that both come from "outside the political establishment."
One of the main things they share, Harper said, is the challenge of fixing the crippled global economy, achieving success in Afghanistan and addressing environmental and energy concerns
Harper has spoken with Obama three times and described him as "very easy to talk to."
He said he is looking forward to meeting the president in person for a more extended visit.
"The conversations I have had with him haven't been lengthy, but we've covered a lot of ground. He's been very focused on what his agenda for the fall is, what he wants to achieve. Obviously we're going to have many more hours when he's here on Thursday."
Harper said he believes the Obama administration has a "great sense" of the importance of the Canada-U.S. relationship, and the potential to build on it.
Itinerary details
Obama's plane will be landing at Hangar 11 at Ottawa international airport at about 10:30 a.m., where he will be greeted by Gov. Gen. Michaelle Jean followed by a short, private meeting.
After that, Obama's motorcade will travel to Parliament Hill where thousands of well-wishers are expected to be waiting outside a security fence, hoping for a glimpse of the president.
The two leaders will have a 10-minute one-on-one meeting, then a "restricted" meeting with senior officials, followed by a working lunch with officials.
They will then make statements to the media and take a total of four questions before Obama returns to the airport, where he will meet briefly with Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff.
Finally, Obama will climb aboard Air Force 1 and head home at about 4:30 p.m.
With a report by CTV's Robert Fife
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(64)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
"CTV 1 FAN!"
said
With crises comes political manipulation....
said
People are highly distrustfull of all politicians who got us here through poor financial regulation and poor monitoring that allowed for greed to crash our financial system. We still haven't seen ANY action to eliminate the fraud artists here in Canada.
Little doubt politicians are cooking up schemes to usher in the One World Government by prolonging this crises.
Open your eyes, take the ipod out of you ears and pay close attention to what is happening folks this is serious stuff.
Pat_from_Mississauga
said
RPK ~ KITCHENER
said
When can you remember either national leader sitting down to "TALK" & build on repairing a hurting National economy.
With all pomp and circumstance put aside, & all valuable time set, to sitting down & talk on how "Both Leaders" can "LEAD".
NO Politics ~ No Grand Standing ~ No Personal Agendas just "Good Old Honest Face to Face Talking".
This is a "FIRST" in our Nations History, of leaders meeting, for one reason or another focused solely on each others "Economy" & how each can help in a "Joint Recovery".
May God bless this meeting by giving these fine two leaders "Wisdom & Strength" to walk together in a common cause to build back our nations to places of respect and prosperity.
"GOD BLESS CANADA & THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".
Gail (Hamilton)
said
Steve
said
Marcel
said
Obama's travel flunkey says,
said
Hopeful
said
In this period we need complete cooperation, focus and attention to the global economy and how North America can survive and recover. This will not be a one man accomplishment. Teamwork is essential.
Good luck gentlemen. You hold the future of millions in your hands.
Drew from T.O
said
Lets keep it bussiness people.
Keep Michael Ignatieff out of the political spin so he can do his best to sabotage Harper any chance the so called educated leader can get.
Sit back and let the Economist do his job!!
I don't know why in Canada we seem to let the Liberals scare us into voting for them on the premiss that they are smarter and more educated so they make the better choice. Talk about scare tactics. ("Don't vote for him becasue he is not educated" If you vote for him you are not smart") Give me a break!
Spencer Coles
said
Jonathan
said
Doug, Medicine Hat
said
Chris in Ontariariari-Oh!
said
It make's much more sense to deal with environmental issue's as a continent as we share the same land mass we can effect a more progressive action plan.
Economically we are so intertwined financially and logistically that should one industry suffer it will impact the other country.
Protectionism is the worse thing that could happen to either country now as the impact will be felt by either side of the border this include's China.Whether you like it or not that $2.99 wrench you bought at Canadian Tire,the one that would have cost you $12.99 when made in Canada a few year's ago pale's in comparison to the huge trade in oil and potash we do with them now.Let's face it we cannot produce these product's for the realistic price Canadian's are willing to pay.Our cost to produce these item's has put us out of the market and blame whoever you want this is the reality.
There is not just resource good's being traded as there are other Canadian company's there involved in technology's to fuel the exploding consumer demand created by a growing economy.Let's face it these people only want the same lifestyle we take for granted.We can't say whether there have been big job losses due to China's export's as the import/export business and the other trade we do with them account's for a quite a bit.We have needed to look worldwide for skilled trade's due to shortage's.
MuskyBuck
said
How about we talk about Harpers election promise. Remember?
The man had no definitive action plan for the next few years except to make a vague promise about 'family values' and 'gettin tough on crime'.
Here's a quote in regards to the increase in crime in Vancouver that has been steadily increasing since Stephen has been in power since 2006.
Quote: "Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson said the city's police department is too small to get a handle on the violence. He says it needs 475 more police officers to bring its staff in line with the Toronto police and 875 more to compare in size to Montreal's force."
So....Mr Reform, whats your answer for this?
Your getting tough on crime plan doesn't seem to be worth any more than your salt as a leader.
Jon in London ON
said
He 'sold the sizzle' - last week — Obama hosted a cocktail party at the White House for Dems and served up fancy martinis and an appetizer menu that featured mouthwatering wagyu steak costing $100 a pound.
This is Change?
J.C.
said
Jayme
said
Rob Weldon
said
Bluenose
said
Spencer Coles - You and Marcle must be from the same club? Comparing Canada to China and North Korea because Iggy can't play PM on this visit. How immature of all the Liberals to think they deserve all the attention, when the real PM has important business to attend to. Boo Hoo!! Shows how much importance they place on matters, Liberals are more interested in just being at the party, and pretending they are Democrats.
MuskyBuck - Maybe Vancouver should have spent more money on police, instead of playing the bigshot and blowing billions on the Olympics next year. Don't you think they may have their priorities wrong?
Sean in London
said
There is a lot of hope pinned to these 2 Leaders shoulders.
If they can't collaborate a plan to fight these imperative issues then nobody can.
Good luck and success to you both.
Dayton
said
MRC in Hamilton
said
Rory
said
AndyL
said
The US fly Canadian Flag - Yes it does
said
...does the US Capitol fly Canadian flags from its' lamp posts when our PM visits? "
Yes
Chuck
said
B.A. Schmit Small Town Sask
said
"Besides their age, President Obama and Prime Minister Harper have absolutely nothing in common. The President is a centrist while the PM is right wing. Mr. Obama is against the war in Irak while the PM is in favour. I could list other examples but they would be to long to list. Mr. Teneychke should verify his facts before making an outlandish comment such as this one."
I've yet to figure out why so many people call Harper "extreme' right wing, while Obama is the voice of the center.
Lets get our facts straight people.
Obama - In favor of escalating the war on terror. ie Afganistan.
Harper - Has repeatedly stated we are out of A-Stan in 2011.
Obama - has gone on record as saying Canada's health care system is "extreme socialism"
Harper - Since becoming P.M. has not even flirted with the idea of introducing privatized or two-tier health care.
Obama - as recently as 2008 has stated he is "not in favor of gay marriage."
Harper - allowed a free vote on the issue in the HOC, it failed to pass, dead issue in his mind.
Obama - supports continuation of death penalty for extreme crimes ie. mass murder, rape and murder of a child, ect.
Harper - hasn't even brought the issue up with respect to a free vote you conspiracy-minded left wing nutcases.
So get your facts straight before calling Harper a right-wing lunatic in the mold of George Bush.
Also get your facts straight before calling Obama the "voice from the left".
You left-wing pinkos really are blind in your unfounded rage for our P.M. Harper.
Truth hurts eh?
Doug BC
said
Harper is right wing and Obama is a centrist.?? On what planet??Obama would have to run to the right of Canada if he was running up here.
He's the president of our biggest trade partner.They have to meet.Neither the USA or Canada can expect these talks to be about much more than what direction our respective nations are going with respect to trade.
Obama has been telling Americans that NAFTA is over at the same time he's been telling Canadians our trade with them is not in jeopardy.
Frankly,if you followed Obama's rise to power from where it started,with his election to the Senate,you would quickly see he's quite a spin master,and in fact,I would say a liar.His message changes to suit the audience he's addressing.
I wonder how long it will be before anyone trusts the USA again.They seem to prefer allies who fear them over allies that actually like them.And it seems a treaty with the feds in the USA is not to be trusted either.They use "Buy America" programs,the call it "common sense.If another nation does it,they call it "protectionism."
If we value a sovereign Canada for our kids,we had better get our debts paid off.If we don't we will always have to dance to the USA tune. If we do,we can trade with nations that honour their agreements,and value their allies.
Mel from Calgary
said
In light of what is happening in Vancourver, it would be great if Harper and Iggy both brought up decriminalising drugs to strip the gangs of their money. After all a lot of the gangs are american based.
Chris in Ontariariari-Oh!
said
Many of us left the progressive conservative party and joined the reform party as we were disillusioned with the lack of fiscal accountability and the same old politic's of the past.The political pandering and huge social spending of the Mulroney government to buy vote's.There was no way to tell the difference between the two national party's as they were both corrupt.
We looked for accountability in government where the tax dollar's we sent to Ottawa meant something and were not wasted on frivolity.We still believe strongly in a triple "E" senate as a way to ensure regional fairness as it currently stand's this country is more divided than ever along a urban/rural divide.This has been worsened by the political landscape of the past few year's.Where the term ever came to compare us small "c" conservative's to right wing is an insult as the only right wing I have ever heard was when they talk about fascism.
We are a one person/one vote party ,that is how we elect our representative's and our leader.Our fundraising is done through small donation's by mostly member's.People really need to get there fact's straight as unlike the liberal's whose financing is primarily from big corporation's or government handout.
Don's Littany for Obama/Harper
said
2. Both leaders have to resolve reduced credit & higher bank charges from institutions that received Federal monies.
3. Both leaders have to introduce carefuly planned financial market controls.
4. Both leaders have to ignore favoured-constituent & union demands that exclude the vast North American majority.
5. Both leaders have to re-inspire confidence in the free-market system.
6. Both leaders will be in opposition soon if they don't succeed in doing so
(then Lord preserve us).
hopeful
said
Jonathan
said
Mike
said
Tony
said
The GM failure is a grave warning for Canada if we were just content on being a manufacturing country. Thousands are laid off here in Canada yet millions are laid of in China. With wars, storms, and rising nations the market demands inexpensive products.
Our "Made in Canada" products tend to lose out to American Brands; our Canadian companies tend to be bought out by Americans; our new companies tend to thrive and then sold to an American. Being proud Canadians is not enough in the tough world of business and economics. Go to a trade show and you'll see Canada is not considered on par with America, England, Europe, etc....
Just to let everyone now, Canada made huge gains in our raw material exports to China.
George Charlton
said
kept Canada's economy stronger all through the world depression. No thanks to the like
of Creation or Iggly Wiggly..............
James from Peterborough
said
I have to admit it is very exciting having the President of the United States of America visiting our capital city, Ottawa, Ontario. I hope he feels at home there and has some time to go fishing!
Herb
said
Pat
said
To those who feel bad about Iggy...please remember he is not the PM.
Can't wait for this trip to be over...maybe the media will finally get off their knees and stop drooling everytime Obama is mentioned.
laszlo, Calgary
said
This is an very important meeting for both countries.
We don't need some undemocratically appointed so called leader of the opposition politically grandstanding.Which his arrogance and dumd ego will not prevent him from doing.
Iggy should just get lost and leave the important work, and, time with the Elected Leaders. Not try and play a bunch of stupid politics.
In case he and Commrade Jack had not noticed, Rome Is Burning. It is high time evreyone started working for the Country instead of their own delusional dreams of grandeur.
Laszlo, Calgary
MuskyBuck
said
Forgive me for having to point out the obvious but did Harper make a pledge to be tough on crime or did that come with an asterik?
If it did I didn't catch it.
Are you suggesting that Harper made that only election promise but it shouldn't be expected to be kept at the municiple level...then where exactly does a vague general election promise such as 'gettin' tough on crime' get applied?
"We promise to get tough on crime...at the federal level?"
I didn't hear him promise that either.
What I'm pointing out as I've done before is Harper is an idealist, who deals in vague generalities because as a leader he is incompetant.
He can't run a country beyond the simple management style of a WalMart employee.
He cannot stand up and grow Canada because he's an in the box thinker, programmed to be your accountant at best.
So when crime increases, you would have me and everyone else believe that Harper can be let off the hook for the one and only pledge he was capable of making because that city hasn't handled their books properly?
Which one is it? He's either responsible for taking the initiative on crime that he pledged to do or he's not.
By the way. Harper is anything but centre...he is as right wing as rattlesnake preacher on a hot summer afternoon.
With as much common sense.
Harper wanted to deregulate the banks
said
For the past three months, the only thing consistent about Prime Minister Stephen Harper's position on the economy has been its inconsistency.
During the fall election campaign, Harper pooh-poohed talk of an economic downturn and declared: "My own belief is if we were going to have some kind of crash or recession, we probably would have had it by now."
Last month, in a speech to business moguls in Peru for the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation forum, Harper changed his tune: "The world is entering an economic period unlike, and potentially as dangerous as, anything we have faced since 1929." To address the crisis, he said, "it may well be necessary to take unprecedented fiscal stimulus."
A few days later, the Harper government produced an economic statement that contained no new stimulus, forecast balanced budgets into the next fiscal year, and suggested the economic crisis could be overcome "with prudence and restraint, combined with hard work."
Then in a TV interview, Harper warned: "The truth is I've never seen such uncertainty in terms of looking forward to the future. I'm very worried about the Canadian economy... Obviously we're going to have to run a deficit. We're talking about spending billions of dollars that was not planned."
laszlo, read a book on Canadian Parliament
said
Canada cannot afford more ignorance from politicians like Harper or from their uninformed supporters.
Get yourself educated about how the Canadian governance system works.
No more corporate welfare
said
Harper, the economics genius ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
said
Jack Layton saw it coming.
But then Jack Layton has a PhD.
Harper should go back to the Imperial Oil mailroom. That's about his level of expertise.
Canada can't afford Harper's clownservatives.
KRB
said
Cat
said
Andrea H
said
Obama is now the new USA President, have some respect for one of our biggest trading partners, and allies.
kate
said
Real
said
Don inNB
said
why are we making a big deal of this qucik luncheon as some sort of US/Can breakthrough
NOT !!
Dream on folks
ME
said
Get real Iggy--Obama doesn't need to meet with you anymore tham Harper needs to meet with Mccain
Snikkles
said
Reener
said
Muskybuck, go back under your rock. How can you possibly equate the crime rates in Montreal or Vancouver to a broken election promise by the Conservatives? Seriously, tell me, because I am trying desperately to understand. And what is the alternative - the Liberals who have made a mockery of the entire legal system in this country? Kill someone drunk driving, that's ok, slap on the wrist, go out and kill again. Seriously, please explain because your types always see the bad in the Conservatives, but can't point to a single good thing about the party you do support, or worse, you just say you don't support anyone and never vote.
Raymond
said
But then Jack Layton has a PhD"
And I'm very sure Stephen Harper saw it coming as well. Jack Layton's mindless soapboxing about the impending crash of the economy probably caused far more damage than if he'd kept his mouth shut.
Yelling fire in a theatre was a stupid move, especially for a PhD.
Reener
said
Edwaed
said
Bernard Romanycia
said
Rod
said
George C - Toronto
said
I guess the people who still support this short-sighted, kinda-overall-bizarre statement from the 'economist' PM still think he's good enough to lead this great nation.
Go figure ...
JR
said
Tony
said
BarryBanker
said
"Obama's first 100 days" sponsored by JP Morgan... WAKE UP PLEASE!
JP MORGAN... JP MORGAN!