Canada -
News Sections
Arts groups want new rules for Internet content
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(77)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Feb. 17 2009 5:40 PM ET
Canadian arts groups are asking the country's broadcast regulator to impose greater regulations of content on the Internet to protect the future of Canadian programming.
Members of Canada's arts community have begun appearing before the Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) in Gatineau, Que., where the regulator is conducting hearings to review its current hands-off approach to new media content.
These arts groups argue that Canadian content rules that govern traditional broadcast media should apply to Internet broadcasts, as well.
"Broadcasting is broadcasting regardless the distribution platform," Alain Pineau, national director of the Canadian Conference of the Arts, told the hearing on Tuesday.
Speaking to CTV's Canada AM early Tuesday, actor and comedian Colin Mochrie said that Canadian broadcasters spend upwards of $800 million on foreign programming, which eventually finds its way online.
Mochrie said that because it is so common for people to watch television shows on the Internet or on personal media gadgets such as iPods, new media should be regulated to ensure that Canadian content has a place online.
"With no regulation on the Internet, there's a big fear that all Canadian content will be buried by foreign content," Mochrie said.
He added that the performers would like to see a levy charged to Internet providers that would fund the production of Canadian programs -- a position that both ACTRA and the Directors Guild of Canada (DGC) have endorsed.
Experts say that such a levy would likely be passed on to consumers, which would lead to a price hike for Internet service.
Despite such criticisms, ACTRA and the DGC have asked the CRTC to create a fund to finance Canadian productions that are destined for the web. They say the fund should be paid for by Internet and wireless providers to the tune of $100 million annually.
The CRTC regulates conventional radio and television broadcasters to ensure they abide by Canadian content regulations.
In 1999, the CRTC decided not to step in and enforce such rules on the Internet. In 2007, it also exempted broadcasts that are sent to cellphones or other mobile devices from the rules.
Broadcasting content is becoming more prominent online, as the websites of conventional television broadcasters, including CTV, offer newscasts, television shows and other programming for free.
Critics say that it would be extremely difficult to gauge precisely how much Canadian content is available online, as well as on cellphones and other portable devices.
It's a difficult task, said Canadian Cable Systems Alliance representative Harris Boyd, because "there isn't anybody actually managing the content other than the customers who decide what they are going to access, from when and where."
"The bottom line is they are trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist," he added.
It is also unclear if broadcast rules can be applied to Internet content because not everyone agrees that what appears online can be called a broadcast.
"In the Broadcast Act, a program is any combination of images and text that inform, enlighten, entertain, and if it reaches people using broadcast apparatus, it's a broadcast," said Mochrie. "And that sounds like the Internet to me."
Carleton University journalism professor Ira Wagman said that concerns about Internet regulation stem from the fact that broadcasting online is still a relatively new phenomenon.
"So a lot of this is about a kind of anxiety within the industry itself about not knowing what's going on and trying to chart the future for the ways in which Canadians use the Internet and the activities of broadcasters in new media."
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(77)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
David P
said
Ah, there's the rub. Most Canadian content is abject drivel that no one would watch. Thus the protectionist instincts of the third rate hacks that populate Canada's Arts communities.
dwayne-ottawa
said
Doug
said
MichaelWH
said
Here's a free clue: it's not even possible to control the P2P file sharing out there which is flatly illegal in most cases.
It's 2009 not 1909! no more regulation please
said
We live in a free society and the quality of the product offered will make the difference.
Stop trying to control what people are watching, we are in 2009 not 1909!
Kevin P
said
The CRTC's support to ban Canadians access the big American networks websites for free HD of all their major series such as LOST and Battlestar Galactica hurts the industry and the right to free and equal access.
I would argue that by blocking these U.S. sites, it also has the result of allowing the American networks to charge higher redistribution fee's to the Canadian players because there is no other way in Canada to legally watch these programs.
I would also argue that these actions to block entertainment access is largely what is growing the surge to software like Bit Torrent, to illegally download programs like these. Once a person starts using a download program like this "for just 1 show", how many people in Canada will not expand their use? Then comes movies and music downloading, and the vicious cycle gets magnified.
Protectionism in any industry does not help the industry. Period. Better products and services do.
In Canada, we can easily pay 150.00 per month for a full cable or satellite package. A percentage of this goes to "Canadian content" every year. This annual fund if I recall correctly, topped out at around 600 million last year! Taxpayers also subsidize the ultimate "Canadian content" that is the CBC, over 1 billion per year! Enough is enough! Direct TV in the U.S. has 3 times the channels for just over 1/3 the price! We are being sadly gouged in Canada!
If Canadian companies after so many years of draconian protectionism and support by tax payers dollars cannot compete on their own, it is time to completely open the markets.
This goes for broadcasters, movie companies, cell phone providers, and satellite and cable suppliers.
Bob
said
All they need to do is produce quality programs that people want to watch. No regulation is required !
Joe
said
SK Freedom Lover
said
Rod
said
John R from Ontario
said
Lots of home made Canadian content is available online, in the form of blogs, podcasts and images. You could consume 100% Canadian content if you wished. You could also consumer 100% US content. The same can be said for TV and Radio. Just turn the station.
You can't apply traditional media rules to new media.
Phil
said
This could bring a precedent case of backstreet isolation proxy by poverty.
How? Redundancies will be revalued by isp's/Cable customers, Cable service providers will suffer because content can be more controlled on the INTERNET by the consumers.
Another problem the fees could spill over to included a price on ALL or most non-pirated meant to be free content offered trough isp's.
James
said
I think more people would enjoy themselves i they paid to go and see a Canadian movie, concert or comedian live. Its good for business and its good for the economy.
R/H
said
Get out of our face, Canadian actors, produce GOOD shows and we will watch, nuff said.
James T.
said
ian
said
David in Toronto
said
Here's a hint, the Internet allows people to watch whatever they want. If they're not watching Canadian content, it's not because it's being swamped by foreign content.
We don't need to pay more just so we can ultimately be looking at the same content as we were before.
Improve the quality, and people will want it. The better quality Canadian content isn't having a problem, it's the poor quality products that do and are the ones demanding the regulations and hand out.
Erin
said
W. Robinson
said
A price hike, so that we can be forced to watch talently bankrupt Canadians (or even worse,listen to slang or linguistically inferior Quebecois french).
This nonsense is why people quit watching cable TV and went to the Internet, (to get away from the thought zealots)
Dan James
said
Dr. James Bradford
said
The CRTC has LOST ALL MORAL GROUND WITH WHICH TO DICTATE WHAT IS CANADIAN CONTENT.
Canadians do want nor need the CRTC trying to tell us what to watch read, listen to etc... this is a dinosaur organization that is out of touch with family values and mainstream Canada.
BFA
said
Mike
said
Well Mr. Mochrie, if it isnt any good people wont watch it. PERIOD. You can legislate till the cows come home but you cant force people to watch crappy stuff if they don't want to.
END OF STORY.
GET rid of the CRTC now !!
said
Puhlease!!
colin mochery
said
Dave, Perth
said
Randy, London
said
If the Canadian content is so bad that broadcasters must be forced to play it, I won't be watching anyway.
Steve
said
Scott
said
NO WAY!
I will not pay more for my internet service. Who is allowed to control over us everyday Canandians for our internet?? CRTC, are you thinking to be like China?
Now, about the Canadian shows? No, I don't watch on TV - I don't even have cable in my home and if I do, ALL shows are boring anyway! I find their timetable to be rigid, if it's at 8 PM - I don't want be "slaved" to their decided timeframe daily!
I like my viewing flexible and whenever I feel like to watch. That's why there are TV sitcom DVDs to decide and choose only good and creavtive, and none of the boring, dumb and tired shows.
LEAVE OUR INTERNET ALONE! We don't need increase cost on that.
Enough is enough.
said
David P
said
Will we require all Canadian porn stars to get a maple leaf tattoo for ease of recognition? Where should it be placed for maximum visibility? What porn scenarios constitute "Canadian"? Pizza delivery guy = no. Poutine delivery guy = yes.
We need a Royal Commission on Canadian Online Porn!
mike
said
AndyL
said
pk
said
Norm in NB
said
May
said
I'm going to continue my subscription with Shaw.
Steve the Pundit
said
Quality beats regulation every time.
Mike Classic
said
The public would interpret this as a tax or payment towards the creation of the content, thereby making it 'free' to them.
If you want the perception of Canadian content to change, you must step out of the mindset that it needs to be paid for by the people and protected by the Government.
I watch and listen to Canadian content because I wish to, not because I've been forced to.
JohnS
said
Littlebird
said
Rob in Alberta
said
If the internet had existed in the 30s and 40s, governments such as Hitler's and Stalin's would have done this. No society which wishes to be considered 'free' should even consider it.
Rest assured, the controls would start with cultural product, and then spread to control of unapproved political views.
JM
said
These guys are afraid of competition...because much of 'Canadian Content' is so second-rate. Even these 'artists' know it and want to dictate what people can or cannot watch. What a bunch of shameful losers.
What are they thinking??
said
Jasper
said
From Vancouver
said
Eric Gisin
said
Andrew
said
Mark M
said
CRTC should be abolished. It's useless in today's world and I'm sick of watching The Beachcombers reruns!
Jason W.
said
If no one's watching, it's because no one wants to. Such drivel should not be subsidized by consumers.
Canadian performers: We don't want your tax, just let we don't want your poor programming. Get a real job, and quit asking us to support your floundering careers.
John Calgary
said
Steve T
said
What a life to live, to have no-questions-asked funding and an audience who is forced to use your product. With that business model, I could produce a square tire and still make money.
With all the layoffs going on right now in industries that actually have to fight to be competitive, it's a bit rich for these actors to be making this pitch at this point in time.
Mike (Parksville)
said
chuck bryan
said
Ryan
said
Mark
said
Would Canadians accept a regulation that says they MUST buy cars from a Canadian Car company? Would dealerships accept regulations stating that for every foreign car sold, they must sell two Canadian ones?
So why do we as consumers accept this regulation of our media? Why on Earth are we being forced as consumers to pay for Canadian content that is quite often mediocre *at best*? It infuriates me that I am forced to subsidize actors and an industry that cannot produce a quality product, just so that they can stay employed on my dime.
You wouldn't accept an inferior car just because it was Canadian made, so why are we being forced to accept inferior media? As a consumer, I demand choice and I am almost apoplectic that we are denied it by the CRTC. Canadian Content rules should be abolished!
Canaduh!
said
ARGH !! ENOUGH OF THIS FOOLISHNESS
said
GET RID OF THE CRTC
We dont need a bunch of political has beens telling us what is and isnt appropriate.
Clearly pornography is wrong but the CRTC thinks its appropriate for Canadians to warp their minds like the CRTC have.
GET RID OF THE CRTC NOW..
Sarah
said
Al
said
Ron White
said
Ryan in Calgary
said
Think about it, Most people in Canada go Canadian websites for Canadian & Foreign programming. If they regulate that, they will simply go somewhere else! Lost advertising dollars for the broadcasters, which is bad, but even worst, even less exposure for Canadian programming.
Time for the CRTC, broadcasters, actors, etc. to join the 21st Century, and forget 20th Century ideas that won't work anymore!
DC
said
It's a misplaced fear. On the internet good content wins no matter where it is made. And there are Canadians out there doing just that...creating interesting content on the internet along with people from all over the world.
What I suspect Mr. Mochrie really means by that comment is that the "established" (i.e. often government regulated and funded) canadian content will be buried by internet content.
And yes, they DO have something to fear if they're mediocre content in the face of millions of other options.
Shane in Fredericton
said
Laura
said
Marcel from Northern Ontario
said
Warren in NL
said
Dave in NB
said
darren
said
Mike from Toronto
said
Our so called strong industry is at the whim of every dollar fluctuation and budget. Cynthia Dale is in every show we make...same with this dude. I am so sick of government subsidies, but it is the way it works here... and the way this boils down, is ... this will be approved... and becaause they can't POSSIBLY control the internet the way they do cable..teh CRTC will slap a levy on ISP's ... Except maybe ROGERS which will get an exemption for 2 years to insure they are not unfairly hurt. WAH.
Martin.NS.
said
Ian Shaw
said
Scott
said
Chris
said
Jared
said
I don't see Russell Peters needing any government intervention to get people to watch his comedy shows or go to his live shows! In fact, we should be encouraging more Russell Peters', instead of shutting this country to foreign content.
Robert White
said
MuskyBuck
said
I can say 'these actors' are way off mark.
I had a three month RCMP investigation that concluded wrongdoing.
The case was sent to Canada's Crown for prosecution but the Crown declined to lay charges because in principle Canada's Copyright Act allows for someone to rip and steal work as long as the offending party 'rewrites' the original piece.
If this group wants real change that is worth anything they would start by making everyone aware at how horrible Canada's Copyright Act is written.
Greg in Cambridge
said
NO MORE!