CTV News | Arts groups want new rules for Internet content

Canada -   

Arts groups want new rules for Internet content

Viewer

CTV News Video

Power Play: Richard Hardacre, president, ACTRA
Canada AM: Colin Mochrie, Canadian actor and comedian, on regulating Internet content
Canada AM: Ira Wagman, an assistant professor at Carleton, discusses the broader implications

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(77)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Feb. 17 2009 5:40 PM ET

Canadian arts groups are asking the country's broadcast regulator to impose greater regulations of content on the Internet to protect the future of Canadian programming.

Members of Canada's arts community have begun appearing before the Canadian Radio-television Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) in Gatineau, Que., where the regulator is conducting hearings to review its current hands-off approach to new media content.

These arts groups argue that Canadian content rules that govern traditional broadcast media should apply to Internet broadcasts, as well.

"Broadcasting is broadcasting regardless the distribution platform," Alain Pineau, national director of the Canadian Conference of the Arts, told the hearing on Tuesday.

Speaking to CTV's Canada AM early Tuesday, actor and comedian Colin Mochrie said that Canadian broadcasters spend upwards of $800 million on foreign programming, which eventually finds its way online.

Mochrie said that because it is so common for people to watch television shows on the Internet or on personal media gadgets such as iPods, new media should be regulated to ensure that Canadian content has a place online.

"With no regulation on the Internet, there's a big fear that all Canadian content will be buried by foreign content," Mochrie said.

He added that the performers would like to see a levy charged to Internet providers that would fund the production of Canadian programs -- a position that both ACTRA and the Directors Guild of Canada (DGC) have endorsed.

Experts say that such a levy would likely be passed on to consumers, which would lead to a price hike for Internet service.

Despite such criticisms, ACTRA and the DGC have asked the CRTC to create a fund to finance Canadian productions that are destined for the web. They say the fund should be paid for by Internet and wireless providers to the tune of $100 million annually.

The CRTC regulates conventional radio and television broadcasters to ensure they abide by Canadian content regulations.

In 1999, the CRTC decided not to step in and enforce such rules on the Internet. In 2007, it also exempted broadcasts that are sent to cellphones or other mobile devices from the rules.

Broadcasting content is becoming more prominent online, as the websites of conventional television broadcasters, including CTV, offer newscasts, television shows and other programming for free.

Critics say that it would be extremely difficult to gauge precisely how much Canadian content is available online, as well as on cellphones and other portable devices.

It's a difficult task, said Canadian Cable Systems Alliance representative Harris Boyd, because "there isn't anybody actually managing the content other than the customers who decide what they are going to access, from when and where."

"The bottom line is they are trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist," he added.

It is also unclear if broadcast rules can be applied to Internet content because not everyone agrees that what appears online can be called a broadcast.

"In the Broadcast Act, a program is any combination of images and text that inform, enlighten, entertain, and if it reaches people using broadcast apparatus, it's a broadcast," said Mochrie. "And that sounds like the Internet to me."

Carleton University journalism professor Ira Wagman said that concerns about Internet regulation stem from the fact that broadcasting online is still a relatively new phenomenon.

"So a lot of this is about a kind of anxiety within the industry itself about not knowing what's going on and trying to chart the future for the ways in which Canadians use the Internet and the activities of broadcasters in new media."

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

David P
said

Why do Canadian acotrs need speical protection? Produce a quality product and people will watch it.

Ah, there's the rub. Most Canadian content is abject drivel that no one would watch. Thus the protectionist instincts of the third rate hacks that populate Canada's Arts communities.


dwayne-ottawa
said

Maybe if Canadian content was worth watching the people would not have to worry about this. The problem goes way back to the good old days when we had the censorship board, they brought in the canadian content rule so that we would broadcast more canadian shows. Well there has not been that many of them over the last 40 years, nothing really sticks out in my head. Canadian tv is boring........that is why i have a sat dish i dont have to watch any wishy washy canadian granola crunching non valiance, non sexual, shows without the f word. Wake up people dont be dictated to how much canadian content u have to watch.


Doug
said

How on earth are they going to do this? By blocking non-canadian websites? Perhaps if Canadian programming wasn't either sub-par or preachy about a certain way of life(Little Mosque) I would watch it more often.


MichaelWH
said

How, precisely, do these geniuses figure they'll know what kind of content I'm watching?

Here's a free clue: it's not even possible to control the P2P file sharing out there which is flatly illegal in most cases.


It's 2009 not 1909! no more regulation please
said

More regulation will not solve the problem, it will create greater problem.

We live in a free society and the quality of the product offered will make the difference.

Stop trying to control what people are watching, we are in 2009 not 1909!


Kevin P
said

Ban movies and books next?...well, most of them aren't "Canadian"

The CRTC's support to ban Canadians access the big American networks websites for free HD of all their major series such as LOST and Battlestar Galactica hurts the industry and the right to free and equal access.

I would argue that by blocking these U.S. sites, it also has the result of allowing the American networks to charge higher redistribution fee's to the Canadian players because there is no other way in Canada to legally watch these programs.

I would also argue that these actions to block entertainment access is largely what is growing the surge to software like Bit Torrent, to illegally download programs like these. Once a person starts using a download program like this "for just 1 show", how many people in Canada will not expand their use? Then comes movies and music downloading, and the vicious cycle gets magnified.

Protectionism in any industry does not help the industry. Period. Better products and services do.

In Canada, we can easily pay 150.00 per month for a full cable or satellite package. A percentage of this goes to "Canadian content" every year. This annual fund if I recall correctly, topped out at around 600 million last year! Taxpayers also subsidize the ultimate "Canadian content" that is the CBC, over 1 billion per year! Enough is enough! Direct TV in the U.S. has 3 times the channels for just over 1/3 the price! We are being sadly gouged in Canada!

If Canadian companies after so many years of draconian protectionism and support by tax payers dollars cannot compete on their own, it is time to completely open the markets.

This goes for broadcasters, movie companies, cell phone providers, and satellite and cable suppliers.




Bob
said

I agree with Dave and Dwayne
All they need to do is produce quality programs that people want to watch. No regulation is required !


Joe
said

If I wanted to watch something Canadian, I'd find it. Canadian shows basically are sub par. There's only maybe one or two that are worthwhile but the rest suck. One good Canadian show is Mantracker. Can't find another good one.


SK Freedom Lover
said

NO! Isn't it supposed to be a free market? Doesn't the power of the internet lie in its democratic foundations? Now we have a small group of liberal actors (the ones always banging on about freedom etc.) who want it regulated for their personal benefit while the rest of us don't count...Once again, laws written for a 'victims group' that remove freedoms from those who are not members...


Rod
said

If Canadian content, was anygood, you would not have to worry about what was being watched. Truth is shows are lousey, even if actors might be good.


John R from Ontario
said

You can't regulate the content on the Internet, or you become China. What we need is Canadian content providers (and from around the world) to open up and make all content available to anyone anywhere. If someone from the US tries to watch an episode of 'Corner Gas' or 'Little Mosque' on the Canadian website, they are blocked. Much the same happens on US sites.

Lots of home made Canadian content is available online, in the form of blogs, podcasts and images. You could consume 100% Canadian content if you wished. You could also consumer 100% US content. The same can be said for TV and Radio. Just turn the station.

You can't apply traditional media rules to new media.


Phil
said

Information is supposed to bring the world together, but now this would insinuate that money should be dished out by the receivers of that information?

This could bring a precedent case of backstreet isolation proxy by poverty.

How? Redundancies will be revalued by isp's/Cable customers, Cable service providers will suffer because content can be more controlled on the INTERNET by the consumers.

Another problem the fees could spill over to included a price on ALL or most non-pirated meant to be free content offered trough isp's.



James
said

It would be nice to see that the CRTC regulate Canadian content more closely. Canadians have incredible talent and the actors, comedians and singers should be protected somewhat by the CRTC so that it becomes a viable business instead of being pirated or played on the internet.

I think more people would enjoy themselves i they paid to go and see a Canadian movie, concert or comedian live. Its good for business and its good for the economy.


R/H
said

Now they're trying to increase the Internet cost to us lowly Canadians, who by the way, prefer to watch GOOD TV shows and movies. Guess if this goes through there will be a few of us, many I hope, that give the ISP and CRTC the boot. But I would miss my email!
Get out of our face, Canadian actors, produce GOOD shows and we will watch, nuff said.


James T.
said

When are these so-called Canadian "actors" going to realize that we're sick of their cancon crap? Fifty years of Anne Murray Specials and Beachcomber re-runs is enough!! We go online to get GOOD content, not to coddle mediocre losers who'd be far better off mastering the nuances of making french fries!


ian
said

canadian content?!! whats that? some shows are good most aren't .i find even the american shows arent worth watching anymore .every sitcom has a person with an accent,a know all,a family person ,and a problem that they all have to solve to learn a lesson from. most homes the show people live in are nicer than anything ill ever own and all have a dog. most space shows have a useless team that solves any problem as well has a scottish guy ,a mixed race guy,a hot woman, and funny hair dews, and no space ship has seat belts. can the writers come up with something better ????


David in Toronto
said

Why should I have to shell out more per month on my Internet bill just so the Canadian actors can get a cash grab?

Here's a hint, the Internet allows people to watch whatever they want. If they're not watching Canadian content, it's not because it's being swamped by foreign content.

We don't need to pay more just so we can ultimately be looking at the same content as we were before.

Improve the quality, and people will want it. The better quality Canadian content isn't having a problem, it's the poor quality products that do and are the ones demanding the regulations and hand out.


Erin
said

Canadian content needs protection because it does not have the money to produce good quality programming in the first place. It can't compete against multi-million dollar American productions.


W. Robinson
said

That's just great...

A price hike, so that we can be forced to watch talently bankrupt Canadians (or even worse,listen to slang or linguistically inferior Quebecois french).

This nonsense is why people quit watching cable TV and went to the Internet, (to get away from the thought zealots)


Dan James
said

I should be able to watch what I want regardless of Canadian content or not...I should be allowed to have the TV channels I want. Canadian or American...REGARDLESS OF WHO IS IN THEM OR WHERE THEY ARE MADE....I Thought our land was glorious and Free...not when it comes to television...if they are worried about us watching foreign programming step up the quality.


Dr. James Bradford
said

The CRTC should be abolished. They allowed a pornography channel to operate in Canada.

The CRTC has LOST ALL MORAL GROUND WITH WHICH TO DICTATE WHAT IS CANADIAN CONTENT.

Canadians do want nor need the CRTC trying to tell us what to watch read, listen to etc... this is a dinosaur organization that is out of touch with family values and mainstream Canada.


BFA
said

Let market forces dictate which shows survive and and which do not. The CRTC doesn't have any business regulating what we watch on the net. Ask someone at your local radio station about what the CRTC has done for them...


Mike
said

"With no regulation on the Internet, there's a big fear that all Canadian content will be buried by foreign content," Mochrie said.

Well Mr. Mochrie, if it isnt any good people wont watch it. PERIOD. You can legislate till the cows come home but you cant force people to watch crappy stuff if they don't want to.

END OF STORY.


GET rid of the CRTC now !!
said

CRTC is outdated and frankly stupid.... trying to control the world to suit their agenda?

Puhlease!!


colin mochery
said

ISP's around the country cant even guarantee exact advertised speeds. Colin Mochery and other canadian actors want consumers to pick up the tab for new media? Forget it!


Dave, Perth
said

We have to mandate Canadian content? Could this be because if we don't nobody will watch it? Most Canadian content is garbage and not worth watching. I don't listen to radio because of the Can-Con rules,they just keep shoving that horrible Nickelback down my throat continuously and now they want to do the same with video content. ARRRGGGHHHH the video equivalent of Nickleback is more than I can bear. Please just leave it alone!


Randy, London
said

Why should we have Canadian content forced on us, if it is good we will watch it.

If the Canadian content is so bad that broadcasters must be forced to play it, I won't be watching anyway.


Steve
said

These actors do not care about protecting anything but their paychecks.


Scott
said

Are you serious?! Canadian actors want us to PAY MORE for internet so we can watch good shows? Too early for April Fool's Day... hmm?

NO WAY!

I will not pay more for my internet service. Who is allowed to control over us everyday Canandians for our internet?? CRTC, are you thinking to be like China?

Now, about the Canadian shows? No, I don't watch on TV - I don't even have cable in my home and if I do, ALL shows are boring anyway! I find their timetable to be rigid, if it's at 8 PM - I don't want be "slaved" to their decided timeframe daily!

I like my viewing flexible and whenever I feel like to watch. That's why there are TV sitcom DVDs to decide and choose only good and creavtive, and none of the boring, dumb and tired shows.

LEAVE OUR INTERNET ALONE! We don't need increase cost on that.


Enough is enough.
said

This is getting pretty sickening, you can not legislate culture and arts.. Personally this would make me boycott the extremely mediocre content. But this doesn't come much of a surprise in our entitlement society, actors and artists are elite, they deserve our money! Abolish the CRTC and don't stop there, our government is a heaping waste of resources.


David P
said

Given the great deal of pornography available on the internet, does this mean we'll need the CRTC to determine what constitutes Canadian content in porn?

Will we require all Canadian porn stars to get a maple leaf tattoo for ease of recognition? Where should it be placed for maximum visibility? What porn scenarios constitute "Canadian"? Pizza delivery guy = no. Poutine delivery guy = yes.

We need a Royal Commission on Canadian Online Porn!


mike
said

I can't believe this. What next? Put all foreign books and media in a pile and burn?


AndyL
said

This is protectionism pure and simple. It also breed mediocre talent.


pk
said

"WHO'S line" thats some quality canadian television. love our amazing, large, canadian company Disney.


Norm in NB
said

Keep your hands off a good thing.


May
said

Yep...thats the ticket. Making canadians, or trying to make canadians, agree to something that the "majority" probably wouldn't go for to begin with. Don't get me wrong, I'm a proud canadian who supports all things that makes our country what it is, but as of late?? well...things have been a little to extreem. Censurship of our airways,ect have gone to far. No wounder everyone, (myself included) look to satelight or programing other than CBC. It has become to dead with re-runs, and out dated programing that dosn't grab a younger audience. (And I'm in my 30s!) Now this?
I'm going to continue my subscription with Shaw.


Steve the Pundit
said

In the same way that the quality of North American built cars has improved over the years so, too, has a lot of "Canadian" programming. And, in the same way that it has taken years to forget the "Chevy Vega" and its ilk so, too, will it take years for the TV watching public to forget "The Trouble With Tracy".

Quality beats regulation every time.


Mike Classic
said

The difficulty of an added levy to Internet subscribers would be similar to the levy on blank CD-Rs.

The public would interpret this as a tax or payment towards the creation of the content, thereby making it 'free' to them.

If you want the perception of Canadian content to change, you must step out of the mindset that it needs to be paid for by the people and protected by the Government.

I watch and listen to Canadian content because I wish to, not because I've been forced to.


JohnS
said

Mochrie? I never would have heard of this guy if not for US TV. A levy on ISp's, ah that's the cure for all the evils of the internet tax it out of existence.


Littlebird
said

Ok so CRTC starts charging for the internet like that, then it goes down to the internet providers start to charge more, well now our sweet canadian actors,, what do you think is going to happen, i can tell you, if i have to pay more for my internet i will watch tv and pay for just that, cause it wont be worth paying for both, and hey canadian actors, some of you arent that damn good either, i would not pay to see this colin guy, saw him on whose line is it anyway, i didnt buy that show either,,so dont push it or you guys will have to go states side, but you need to have some class which most of you dont have.. so leave the internet alone, or internet will loose business


Rob in Alberta
said

Isn't this the type of thing that China has recently been criticized for? Blocking their citizen's access to "non-state approved" ideas and culture?

If the internet had existed in the 30s and 40s, governments such as Hitler's and Stalin's would have done this. No society which wishes to be considered 'free' should even consider it.

Rest assured, the controls would start with cultural product, and then spread to control of unapproved political views.


JM
said

"With no regulation on the Internet, there's a big fear that all Canadian content will be buried by foreign content," Mochrie said.

These guys are afraid of competition...because much of 'Canadian Content' is so second-rate. Even these 'artists' know it and want to dictate what people can or cannot watch. What a bunch of shameful losers.


What are they thinking??
said

The internet is a free and public place. Having control that only benefits "some" people is stupid and backwards. If it were regulations on child pornography or terrorism, then it would be reasonable, but this is blow up way out of proportion. If the programming is good, people will watch it, no matter where they are, and they will get their reward and fame. This is just another socialist schemes that smells like the NDP, trying to screw everyone else while benefiting themselves.


Jasper
said

Marketing Concept: Produce a product that people want and need.



From Vancouver
said

Another ludicrous idea from the CRTC. Like anything else, us Canadians will more than likely have little to say on this decision, but know this Mr Mochrie, if I have to dish more money for my internet to protect poor quality product from Canada, I will do my best to boycott anything done by actors who have supported this initiative....


Eric Gisin
said

Internet service providers most certainly are not broadcasters. The big media web sites are broadcasters, they get ad revenue just like all the TV/radio stations. No need for government medling.


Andrew
said

Honestly what regulation do you think should be implemented? We are all faced with the current and the future of the economic hardships bestowed upon us....The only thing we need to focus on regulating are the greedy financial institutions that don't have to work very hard for the money we provide them.....be it a bank or insurance company .....think about it, insurance is mandatory it's the law we have no choice....we accept that we have to pay them and we do and they impose whatever rules they want on us. I want to see Regulation imposed on them after all it's my hard earned money


Mark M
said

Good luck with blocking anything!!! You can watch any show on the Hulu website (Suppose to be for US users/residents only) by using a FREE proxy website. Easy to do. There are even programs out there that set it up all autmatically. Same will apply here. Only thing this will turn out to be is a cash grab for the CRTC who will now be able to "distribute" funds as it sees fit..I.E. More money to the CBC "tax sucking" network. Can you say SCAM!!

CRTC should be abolished. It's useless in today's world and I'm sick of watching The Beachcombers reruns!


Jason W.
said

I'm tired of these whining Canadian performers. Create programming that isn't terrible, and people will watch it. Simple.

If no one's watching, it's because no one wants to. Such drivel should not be subsidized by consumers.

Canadian performers: We don't want your tax, just let we don't want your poor programming. Get a real job, and quit asking us to support your floundering careers.


John Calgary
said

He's being funny, right? It's called the World Wide Web isn't it? How about if every country protected everything they produce? I guess we could end up with a 6 team NHL again.


Steve T
said

So let me get this straight. Canadian actors not only want government hand-outs (as per the big flap last year with the supposed "cuts" to arts funding), they also want government protection to force Canadians to watch them.

What a life to live, to have no-questions-asked funding and an audience who is forced to use your product. With that business model, I could produce a square tire and still make money.

With all the layoffs going on right now in industries that actually have to fight to be competitive, it's a bit rich for these actors to be making this pitch at this point in time.


Mike (Parksville)
said

One cannot regulate what people watch any more than regulate what we read, or say or eat! There are many other far more pressing problems facing our society today.If an outlet for all this energy is needed, go tackle literacy (or lack of it).


chuck bryan
said

What an insult to Canadians! The only way they could regulate Canadian Content on the Internet would be to build the Great Canadian Firewall and setup "cultural censorship." Since China is a good example, why aren't these "hearings" held over there? The CRTC vision of the "True North, Strong and Free" is completely out of touch with average multicultural Canadian reality. In this economic meltdown, its a good time to flush the CRTC Bureaucracy!


Ryan
said

Shut down the CRTC. Redirect its funding to Canadian produced content. Case closed.


Mark
said

Assume for a second that Canada had it's own version of Ford, GM or Chrysler;

Would Canadians accept a regulation that says they MUST buy cars from a Canadian Car company? Would dealerships accept regulations stating that for every foreign car sold, they must sell two Canadian ones?

So why do we as consumers accept this regulation of our media? Why on Earth are we being forced as consumers to pay for Canadian content that is quite often mediocre *at best*? It infuriates me that I am forced to subsidize actors and an industry that cannot produce a quality product, just so that they can stay employed on my dime.

You wouldn't accept an inferior car just because it was Canadian made, so why are we being forced to accept inferior media? As a consumer, I demand choice and I am almost apoplectic that we are denied it by the CRTC. Canadian Content rules should be abolished!


Canaduh!
said

If Canadian were allowed to pay on demand for Canadian content, how many of them would switch to a free American network??? Work backwards from that answer and you'll find the solution! It doesn't surprise me that lefty liberal artsy fartsies want to tax us all so they can live their lifestyle supported by shows no-one wants to watch. This is socialism masking itself as Can-con and the CRTC is not about to support this!


ARGH !! ENOUGH OF THIS FOOLISHNESS
said

How many times does it need to be said...

GET RID OF THE CRTC

We dont need a bunch of political has beens telling us what is and isnt appropriate.

Clearly pornography is wrong but the CRTC thinks its appropriate for Canadians to warp their minds like the CRTC have.

GET RID OF THE CRTC NOW..


Sarah
said

Here's an idea: Produce a quality product that Canadians want to watch and maybe then we'll start paying attention. Until then, stop with the BS protectionist racket Canadian artists keep forcing on us. I don't want to subsidize your second rate media content and I darn well shouldn't be forced to. There will be outrage if the CRTC goes ahead with this, mark my words.


Al
said

Are some of these posters the same ones who jumped all over Harper for cutting funding to the arts? You guys make me laugh! Plus, most of you can't spell so it's no wonder you'd rather watch American reality shows. No thought required.


Ron White
said

This has nothing to do with Canadian content,this is all about the mighty dollar, These so called Canadian Actors want a little more for doing nothing.


Ryan in Calgary
said

I think this a waste of time, and will hurt (not help) this industry!

Think about it, Most people in Canada go Canadian websites for Canadian & Foreign programming. If they regulate that, they will simply go somewhere else! Lost advertising dollars for the broadcasters, which is bad, but even worst, even less exposure for Canadian programming.

Time for the CRTC, broadcasters, actors, etc. to join the 21st Century, and forget 20th Century ideas that won't work anymore!


DC
said

"With no regulation on the Internet, there's a big fear that all Canadian content will be buried by foreign content,"

It's a misplaced fear. On the internet good content wins no matter where it is made. And there are Canadians out there doing just that...creating interesting content on the internet along with people from all over the world.

What I suspect Mr. Mochrie really means by that comment is that the "established" (i.e. often government regulated and funded) canadian content will be buried by internet content.

And yes, they DO have something to fear if they're mediocre content in the face of millions of other options.


Shane in Fredericton
said

Keep your hands out of the Internet! This is an area where I actually think there should be the least government influence possible


Laura
said

I admire and support our Canadian artists but enough is enough. I am not a fan of this request nor am I fan of the existing laws that prevent me from watching a program on American television. Case in point, if I choose to watch the Super Bowl on an american channel to catch the entertaining commercials, why does Canadian programming cut in? I thought we were a free country? Hardly seems so when I can't even watch the t.v. station I choose.


Marcel from Northern Ontario
said

Its not Canadian content it is money. They want money not Candian Content. Why won't they say the truth? Because the truth is not what they want us to hear.


Warren in NL
said

No one has the right to tell me what I can and cannot watch. If it's poor quality, it's poor quality and no amount of regulation will persuade me to watch it.If it's good, I'll watch it. If we entertain regulating the internet then we adopt a communist outlook. In a nutshell, don't screw with my freedom.


Dave in NB
said

After reading all the comments, I would hope that someone actually listens.


darren
said

canadian content is a total waste of time. There are either shows people want to watch and show they don't want to watch. I will decide what I want to watch nobody else.


Mike from Toronto
said

I work in the Film / TV sector... I am ABSOLUTELY apposed to this crap.

Our so called strong industry is at the whim of every dollar fluctuation and budget. Cynthia Dale is in every show we make...same with this dude. I am so sick of government subsidies, but it is the way it works here... and the way this boils down, is ... this will be approved... and becaause they can't POSSIBLY control the internet the way they do cable..teh CRTC will slap a levy on ISP's ... Except maybe ROGERS which will get an exemption for 2 years to insure they are not unfairly hurt. WAH.


Martin.NS.
said

If anything, the internet is helping Canadians get more coverage in the world. With things like Youtube, Facebook/Myspace, and all these other websites, regular Canadians are being recognized for their talents world wide. The CRTC needs to butt out and leave the internet alone. I don't want to see my money going to something that I will not use/watch.


Ian Shaw
said

I think we're on to a new art form. Marcel Marceau made money by performing without sound. Canadian thespians want to make money by not performing. Actually, after watching Canadian productions, that's really a win-win situation for us all.


Scott
said

Stop making crap and I will watch. Otherwise you force me to work around the laws in order to view quality programming.


Chris
said

By now it is obvious to most Canadians that the CRTC is a failure and that the CRTC no longer serves a purpose in today's society. The only ones who haven't figured it out is the CRTC itself. Stop trying to impose regulation on Canadian access to promote Canadian programming when quality will do more than regulation ever could.


Jared
said

What an embarrassment!! Because Canadian comedians aren't funny enough, we have to use protectionist measures and enforce that Canadians view a certain amount of Canadian content on the Internet?

I don't see Russell Peters needing any government intervention to get people to watch his comedy shows or go to his live shows! In fact, we should be encouraging more Russell Peters', instead of shutting this country to foreign content.


Robert White
said

This is about a tax grab to guarantee a subsidy. It will not change how Canadians use the internet or what gets viewed. It may change what Canadian broadcasters post on their sites, but only if there are new requirements for Canadian content of downloadable material. What it will change is the price of basic internet service making Canadian companies less competitive for providing services which may not have any foreign content, such as web hosting an online store which sells made in Canada products.


MuskyBuck
said

As a former broadcaster and a writer who's first work took over four years to complete.....and was stolen by the first group it was pitched to...

I can say 'these actors' are way off mark.

I had a three month RCMP investigation that concluded wrongdoing.

The case was sent to Canada's Crown for prosecution but the Crown declined to lay charges because in principle Canada's Copyright Act allows for someone to rip and steal work as long as the offending party 'rewrites' the original piece.

If this group wants real change that is worth anything they would start by making everyone aware at how horrible Canada's Copyright Act is written.




Greg in Cambridge
said

There is already way too much CONTROL by Government.
NO MORE!


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz