Health -
News Sections
Healthy food prices vary widely across Canada
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(55)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Mon. Feb. 9 2009 1:44 PM ET
Some Canadians are paying between double and nearly six times the average price for healthy foods, depending on where in the country they live, according to a report from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.
The report found price discrepancies across the country and within provinces. It also found many Canadians have difficulty accessing healthy foods at their local grocery store.
The report, entitled "Heart and Stroke Foundation's Annual Report on Canadians' Health," discovered:
- A wide cost variation across the country for fruits and vegetables. For example, six apples cost $0.90 in Peterborough, Ont., but $7.64 in Rankin Inlet, Nunavut.
- Whole-wheat pasta in Dawson City, Yukon, can cost between four and six times what it costs in Barrie, Ont. ($11.37 in Dawson City compared to $2 in Barrie).
- Milk, cheese and meat costs twice in the communities with the highest prices than in the communities with the lowest (the average low price being between $4 and $6 and the highest price ranging from $8 to almost $14).
The high cost and low availability of a variety of healthy foodstuffs puts Canadians at risk of a number of health problems, according to Heart and Stroke Foundation CEO Sally Brown.
"Those risk factors will decrease dramatically if you eat a healthy diet," Brown told CTV Ottawa on Monday. "Because healthy foods do a number of things: you lose weight, it stabilizes your blood pressure, it lowers your cholesterol and it manages your blood sugar. So, we need people to eat healthier, and if we're going to price food in certain communities out of reach, Canadians aren't going to."
According to Brown, 25 per cent of cases of heart disease, stroke and other ailments could be prevented if Canadians were eating a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, grains and lean meats and dairy products.
For the study, Foundation staff recruited 66 volunteer shoppers across Canada who were asked to purchase a list of foods based on Health Canada's National Nutritious Food Basket. The basket was created to aid health officials in evaluating Canadians' accessibility to healthy foods.
The volunteers were asked to choose items from the list to feed a family of four for one week. They shopped at a national or regional grocery chain in their community and were given a list of national food brands to choose from.
Not all of the volunteers could find a wide array of healthy foods.
For example, the volunteers found that dried beans and frozen spinach were unavailable in one out of three grocery stores. One in five stores did not have unbreaded frozen fish, while only 10 per cent of stores carried fresh chicken legs.
In contrast, the prices of unhealthy snacks such as pop, chips and cookies varied little across the country, and were also widely available.
Not surprisingly, a survey of more than 1,400 Canadians contained in the report found that 42 per cent occasionally go without a particular type of food because of the cost.
The survey also found that:
- Nearly one in five Canadians forgo at least one type of food almost every time they shop because of the cost.
- Almost one-quarter of Canadians have to go without lean meat and poultry, while one in five Canadians have to forgo fruit and vegetables.
It is unclear why food prices and availability vary so widely across the country, Brown said.
"We don't know why it happens," she said. "That's why the Heart and Stroke Foundation is saying we really need governments, the food industry and others to research why these prices are so variable."
According to the survey's results, many Canadians feel the government has a role to play in making nutritious foods more accessible.
The survey found that 86 per cent of Canadians believe the government should regulate the price of nutritious foods to ensure that they are equally affordable across the country, while 84 per cent believe government should raise the income of lower-income Canadians.
The Heart and Stroke Foundation agrees, calling on the government to monitor and report on the cost of staple foods included in Health Canada's food basket, research price inconsistencies across the country and improve programs that deliver nutritious foods to isolated northern communities.
"If governments and provinces can regulate the cost of alcohol," the Foundation's Dr. Beth Abramson told CTV Newsnet, "surely we should be able to find some way to make sure Canadians have accessibility to healthy food choices."
User Tools
Related Stories
Subscribe!
CTV.ca Blogs
Related Websites
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(55)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.




Comments are now closed for this story
VH
said
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
"The survey found that 86 per cent of Canadians believe the government should regulate the price of nutritious foods to ensure that they are equally affordable across the country, while 84 per cent believe government should raise the income of lower-income Canadians."
It seems no "Canadian" survey would be complete without capturing our loving embrace of socialism, and the belief that government is our all-important caretaker.
Sad. Pathetic.
Michelle in Steinbach
said
Terri
said
Tax unhealthy food like we do tobacco. Soda pop and chip prices should go up and those taxes can then go into subsidizing healthy foods.
Why should unhealthy food producers get a free ride? Don't you think they affect our health care costs as much as tobacco?
Roger T
said
It doesn't matter where you live, retailers will impose their price fixing becuase if consumers have no other choice to shop.
Hopefully, with the recession dragging on ALL those who've took advantage of consumers will go bankrupt due to greed.
Vee
said
Dave, Ottawa
said
Only two places were specifically mentioned in the article - Rankin Inlet, and Dawson City, both in the high north. Rankin, an Inuit community only accessible by air, is not known for it's abundance of apple trees, nor are apples a staple of the traditonal diet. And Dawson, also a little off the beaten path, does not have a pasta factory. Naturally, all imported goods are going to be more expensive, due to the difficulty in getting them there.
That junk food is consistantly priced is somewhat puzzling, but is likely due to the fact that the high demand for it makes it an "economy of scale" issue.
If there is money to be made by opening a fresh produce store with prices lower than "grocery chains" (remind me again of the name of the grocery chain in Rankin? Is that a Loblaws or a Sobeys? Perhaps it's a Wal-Mart SuperCentre) surely someone will open one.
And the comment about alcohol price regulation was quite amusing. The prices are regulated to make it MORE EXPENSIVE, not less so.
Eric
said
BIG-Jim
said
Hello? Tobacco is not the only thing out there that raises health care costs but so many people like yourself point the finger in only ONE direction.
The grocery stores are full of greed like, Safeway, Save-on foods, IGA, etc.
They are upper management heavy and who gets the privilege of paying their greedy salaries? Us the shoppers trying to feed their families. Fuel went UP so did prices, fuel went down per barrel, not at the pumps and NOT at stores!!
So you need to rethink your logic I am thinking!!!
John Calgary
said
Sara in Sask
said
Kelly in Vancouver
said
I don't know how the government would regulate the costs of these foods, since no trucker is going to accept less money to transport these goods to isolated areas, especially these days.
Doug BC
said
EVERY place you might opt to live comes with a list of pluses and minuses.Some will have more jobs,some will have less crime.Some others will have higher prices,but less crime,and maybe more land.Some let you buy less because you can garden for yourself,or hunt and fish for a part of your diet.
Attempts to make us all the same,no matter where we live,is nothing short of social engineering.We will soon need to alter our national anthem to remove the "true north strong and FREE" part.
It won't be the USA,or bad economic policy,or even provincial differences that tear this country apart.It will be the nannies,the social engineers,the people who do polls,and those who follow them without looking into the context or the unintended consequences that come with them.
I have a novel idea.Live your own life,make your own choices,reap your own rewards for good decisions and take responsibility for the poor ones.
And,oh yea,stop reading self serving polls as though they are commandments for a higher power,and contain the solutions to all your troubles.
This "survey" looks like complete rubbish.Although I concede,it could help someone decide to move to a place where milk is cheaper,it won't tell that peson what they are giving up just to get cheap milk.
I "choose" to accept the higher northern prices in favour a lifestyle I love.I value my rural life a lot more than cheap food in Vancouver.
Jon in Burlington
said
Dale - Edmonton
said
M
said
vicky
said
Kaye
said
Mel from Calgary
said
Something is skewing prices on everything, not just food. This needs to be the topic of CTV's next article.
Michelle
said
As far as the relative low cost and availability of "junk" food in those same locations, who is to say that retails haven't tried to stock healthier choices? Retailers carry the items that will sell, and if the consumers demand pop and chips, then that is what will be on the shelves. I live in an area where the cost and availability of healthy foods is quite good, yet if you examine the carts of the majority of shoppers, they are full of processed, prepackaged and junk foods; and they spend far more than I do on groceries even though my family eats a whole foods, natural and organic diet.
The problem with people's diets isn't a lack of price regulation; if anything the problem is that we expect the government to "fix" everything for us instead of taking personal responsibility for our lives.
Julie
said
What I don't understand is having lived in Hull for a while, why 2L of milk is under 3$ in Hull and literally five minutes across a bridge it is over 4$ for 2L in Ottawa. Ridiculous!
Ara Hepburn
said
Bread is at 4.95 and we live in the lower mainland.
Luckily we don't use butter, margarine, junk or processed foods but buying basic real food is becoming difficult.
Yes, the prices went up when the fuel did but didn't come down when fuel dropped.
We wish that could be looked into.
Faith
said
KJ in Kingston Ontario
said
Laura
said
John Kent
said
I was amazed at your report of the cost differences of food in different parts of Canada , it is obvious that you have no clue as to the fact that it costs a lot of money for trucking these items all the way to Nunavut as an example, or do you really expect these trucking companies to absorb these costs ?your naieve attitude was really surprizing to me.
Liz Sutherland
said
Ed L
said
Does it really sound like more gov't is the solution here?
glen in edmonton
said
rock doc
said
How's That?
said
Mary Clarke
said
So,you can either choose expensive unhealthy choices,or expensive healthy ones.
If you choose to live in the middle of nowhere,you're going to pay a high price for it.
L in Peterborough
said
common sense
said
Leonard Downey
said
A few years back BSE hit the Canadian stage, Famers seen price's crumble to near 0.Government investigated into why pricing never dropped at the retail level, with no results,it was a puzzle.
Northern canada's higher prices are no puzzle their diet is no puzzle, but the difference in pricing in canada's largest city is somewhat puzzling.
If the last investigation is any benchmark, let't not waste anymore money in these rough economic times.
Michelle in Steinbach
said
Laura Langstaff
said
H Herman
said
jayme
said
Exazmple
Bag of chips $2.00
Junk food tax $5.00
How many people would pay $7.00 ofor a bag of chips.
Ron
said
However, isn't that the reason why some communities in northern area like the territories get a northern allowance and often a higher salary? I for one, do not believe Canadians in general through Government, should be subsidzing the cost of fresh produce or fruit. An absolute disater and as others have put it, too socialistic. Maybe a food ombusman to monitor the gouging if it indeed exists.
G. Gravelle, Ottawa, Ontario
said
The price of food should not be based on what city it's sold in but on its actual value.
Van
said
jay
said
I would love to see some solid proof that $40 feed a family for a month.I have its more like $200.
Wee Mikey in BC
said
Get your municipality to set aside some land for apartment dwellers to grow gardens, encourage your local school board to have an extra-mural gardening program for the students.....and on and on.
Leslie
said
KM
said
Our hospitals are full of people whose illnesses are a direct result of the food that they choose to eat.
A person who eats high fat foods is more likely to be overweight and is also more likely to develop heart disease, diabetes, respiratory problems, back pain, knee problems, etc.
Along with all these problems come endless tests, prescription medication, physiotherapy, surgery, etc.
Not a strain on our health care system? I think not.
matt miramichi
said
Jason
said
OH SO TYPICAL
I dunno what to make of people like yourself. Anything that encourages togetherness or fairness seems to so upsetting you decided to come here to blow up. Why do greedy, self serving drags on society feel it necessary to use a vehicle for discussion for such loathsome purposes?
How horrible. Altruism. Egad. I suppose you took or are planning to take your mother somewhere in the wilderness to let her fend for herself when she becomes a burden.
Like you said.
Sad, Pathetic
mike
said
vince in trenton
said
Gail (Hamilton)
said
jay
said
Bonnie G.
said
Greg from Down Under
said
I've got an idea, let's give our friends who live in the north a tax break and an allowance to overcome the higher costs of fresh foods, perhaps call it the Northern Allowance or something...oh, wait a moment...
Better yet a Royal Commission to study the matter.
Brandon Calgary
said
Let me do math if you raise the wage of all the staff who make "lower-incomes" then the store needs to make more money so they raise the cost of the merchandise. so lets look back at our poor worker who got a raise but is still poor because they cant afford anything as the prices went up and the not so poor workers become more poor because they don’t get a raise hmm 1+1=2
Lets be realistic people idealistically it would be great that everyone makes lots of money but if that were true then how are you going to expect any service when no one can afford to pay that employee
Oh and to tax junk food like cigarettes is dumb why not then tax watching tv, sitting on the couch, playing contact sports, beer, fights, internet blogging - i hear that carpal tunnel is the new black?
Taxing cigarettes was great got me to quit and probably saved my life - i dont eat junk food but i like to know that when im to lazy to cook a meal and to poor to eat at a restuarant i have option's