CTV News | Octuplets highly unlikely in Canada, expert says

Canada -   

Octuplets highly unlikely in Canada, expert says

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Dr. Simon Fishel, fertility expert

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(5)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Wed. Feb. 4 2009 12:19 PM ET

The birth of octuplets due to in vitro fertilization would be highly unlikely in Canada, because industry guidelines limit the number of embryos that can be implanted, says one expert.

Nadya Suleman, a 33-year-old single mom from California, recently gave birth to octuplets -- her pregnancy attributed to IVF.

She already had six children -- all conceived using IVF -- with the recent births bringing her total to 14.

Dr. Ed Hughes, a professor of obstetrics and gynaecology at McMaster University, said there are no hard and fast rules in Canada, but that industry guidelines limit the number of embryos that can be transferred to two, he told CTV.ca.

However, three can be implanted in cases where the patient is older, in her 40s, for example, and has a lower chance of getting pregnant.

Hughes said both the U.S. and Canada have patient-pays IVF industries, and at thousands of dollars a cycle, clinics are often under pressure to do whatever it takes to increase the chance of conception.

"If they're under 35, many would do well with a single embryo, but because they're paying $10,000 dollars per cycle they may be reluctant to go that route, so they may prefer to have two embryos put back," he told CTV.ca. 

He added: "It would be absolutely inappropriate to transfer large numbers of embryos -- totally inappropriate."

Suleman's pregnancies have all been attributed to IVF, but Hughes suggested the birth of the octuplets could be the result of ovulation induction, a separate procedure that he said is much harder to control.

In Canada, measures are in place to prevent such an outcome, he said. In addition to clinical practice guidelines in the country, all IVF data is collected and audited each year.

As well, he said, there is a partnership between the industry and the federal Agency for Human Reproduction to reduce multiple pregnancies.

But ultimately, patients and doctors share the responsibility for how many embryos are implanted, he said.

"It's a joint decision. Obviously the clinicians are responsible for their advice and their responsible for their parameters but patients clearly have some input."

Dr. Simon Fishel, a renowned fertility expert and managing director of CAREfertility, told Canada AM it would be against regulations in England to implant more than three embryos.

"It would be reprehensible to put back more than three embryos," he said, of the California case.

"What we would want is to try and improve the chances of pregnancy and deliver a healthy baby without the risk of multiple pregnancy."

High multiple-birth rate

Because in vitro fertilization treatment isn't funded in Canada, many women use fertility drugs in an effort to become pregnant. Those drugs have been blamed for the high number of twin births.

Hughes said Canada should follow the example of a number of European nations and fund in vitro fertilization in order to lower the country's high multiple birth rate.

He said the high rate of twin births results in a serious financial strain on the nation's health care system.

Pregnancies that involve twins have a five-fold higher risk of birth defects and death. As well, twins have a higher chance of being born prematurely and typically require weeks of costly care in neonatal units.

"Provincial governments would do well to look at funding IVF linked with single-embryo transfer because they ultimately would save money by reducing multiple pregnancies which are in turn very expensive to care for," Hughes said.

He said Canada should follow the lead of a number of European countries that have experienced the benefits of providing state funding for IVF.

"In Germany, in Sweden, in Belgium we're seeing multiple pregnancy rates drastically reduced by funding for single-embryo transfer IVF, to less than 10 per cent.

And in Canada our twin rate is still around 25 per cent," Hughes said.

Story for sale

Suleman has reportedly offered to sell her story for $2 million, but Joann Killeen, a spokesperson for Suleman, said Wednesday that financial gain "was not her intention" and that the woman "always wanted to be a mom."

Suleman's previous six children were between the ages of two and seven when she birthed octuplets on Jan. 26.

Killeen said Wednesday doctors have not yet decided when Killeen and the babies will be released, but said they are all doing well.

Comments are now closed for this story

M. Cameron
said

Birthing even just one seems to be a battle, because our national birthrate is disproportionately low compared to other countries of similar geographic and economic size.


Jimmy
said

What is this world coming too?

Now we can get rich by having children irresponsibly and then seel our story of how stupid, and irresponsible we are to the media for millions?

Wow! Can I seel my story of being an average guy, raising 2 kids and trying to make ends meet! While at the same time keeping up with the Joneses?

WOW! Guess I WON'T be teaching my kids to be responsible or to act properly...seems if you do your subject to a "normal" life....

What crazy thing can I do to get rich.....hmmmmmmm!


Jimmy
said

To M.Cameron:

Yes because people in North America are focused on $$$, time, careers and themselves.

50 years ago people didn't get divorced as much and were committed to families. Actually loving their spouses and kids. Working through difficulties...

These same values apply in other countries. But our Lefty, "whattaboutme?" society dictates that we should only concern ourselves with who's #1!

Sad really.....and people wonder why Canada is changing....I wonder!


Jimmy
said

Also not to mention that child care for 2 kids on a 5 day basis is $1200 or higher!
How can people afford that????




David
said

The process has been hijacked by selfish people not realizing that considering having children should be done responsibly. Choosing multiple births when you do not have suitable income is deplorable (also, multiple births puts the health of all at risk). Also, having children past one's biological age (roughly 45) is mindless. Yes you get a child but they will be parented by someone who is much too old to offer complete parenting (physical and mental exhaustion) and will likely lose their parents before they are 20 years old.

Being a parent involves making the best decision for your prospective child.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz