CTV News | Ottawa to create $1B fund for hard-hit workers

Top Stories -   

Ottawa to create $1B fund for hard-hit workers

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Craig Oliver with the latest on the budget
CTV National News: Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife reports on the turmoil over the pending federal budget
CTV Newsnet: Scott Brison, Lib. trade critic
CTV Newsnet: Michael McCracken, president of Informetrica Limited, explains how debt and deficit work
CTV Newsnet: Marc Lee, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, shares his suggestions
CTV Newsnet: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives reacts to the federal budget
CTV Newsnet: Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff discusses the economy in Toronto, part one
CTV Newsnet: Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff discusses the economy in Toronto, part two
CTV Newsnet: Craig Oliver on the meaning of Ignatieff's comments

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(81)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Fri. Jan. 23 2009 6:26 PM ET

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government intends to create a $1-billion assistance fund to help workers in struggling industries as part of its upcoming budget on Jan. 27.

Government officials say the money will come out of a newly-created fund that will help retrain workers from across Canada - in struggling sectors like forestry, agriculture, and manufacturing -- who will benefit from acquiring new skills.

"It will be a stronger, more capable workforce -- and one that's prepared for the jobs of tomorrow," a government official told The Canadian Press.

"We're going to try to protect the jobs of today and prepare for the jobs of tomorrow."

The leak of details is a part of the Tories' public-relations campaign leading up to Tuesday's budget.

The officials say the retraining fund will be a good investment for the long-term because it will elevate the collective skills of the Canadian workforce.

Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt gave limited details of how the fund will work when she spoke to an audience in Sydney, Nova Scotia.

"I expect we will see a flexible new community adjustment fund in the range of $1 billion, to help communities, like forestry communities, as they adjust to the changing economic climate," she said.

Meanwhile, Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz pledged assistance for farmers in Edmonton. And Human Resources Minister Diane Finley and Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq announced new economic-development agencies for southern Ontario and for the North.

The Canadian Press says it is expected that other cabinet ministers will elaborate on details of the plan at events prior to Tuesday's budget.

CP reports that included among the measures announced by the government on Friday to help struggling industries are:

  • $500 million to modernize farms and help provide better equipment.
  • $50 million to expand slaughterhouses.
  • $50 million to promote Canada's forestry sector abroad.
  • $100 million for better forestry technology.
  • Two new economic development agencies, one for struggling southern Ontario and another for Northern Canada.

Ignatieff speaks out about budget

The upcoming budget will be a deficit budget, with a senior government official telling The Canadian Press that it could be as high as $34 billion this year, with a $30 billion deficit to follow the year after that.

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff told a Toronto audience that the prime minister was not playing by the rules when he chose to leak parts of the budget at his convenience.

"I asked Mr. Harper not to play games like that," he said Friday.

"I told him: 'Put the facts and figures on the table.' Don't let them slip out at his convenience.' But the guy just can't help himself."

Ignatieff said the release of budget information "was irresponsible and costly to our economy."

The Liberal leader also said he did not support having broad-based tax cuts included in the upcoming budget.

Liberal finance critic John McCallum repeated Friday that his party will wait to study the entire content of Tuesday's budget before deciding how it will vote.

McCallum says the economic stimulus was necessary, but blamed Tory mismanagement for turning a $13-billion surplus before the economic crisis began to a projected deficit of $68 billion.

McCallum told CTV's On the Hill that Tories were "spending like crazy when times were good," and brought Canada into a much larger deficit situation than it should be, had they spent "responsibly and prudently" before the economic crisis came to light.

McCallum denies any suggestion that there are two groups of Liberals: one that wants to wait for the budget's release before deciding on how to vote, and a more hawkish one that would vote to defeat the budget regardless of what it contains.

"There's one group -- led by Michael Ignatieff - which says .... 'we do not decide how to vote on a budget before we read the budget,'" McCallum said.

"But the budget must protect the vulnerable, it must protect the jobs for today, and it must prepare for the jobs of tomorrow. And if the budget doesn't pass on those tests, and if the actions in the budget are not proportional to the problems this country faces, then we'll vote against the budget."

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Dan from Northern Ont.
said

Now take this kind of budget, and get rid of the more useless programs, and grants given out, and Canada's tax payers would be well represented.


Is there an equality part Im missing?
said

What about the workers being laid off, not in a hard hit industry, but due to this econmic downturn?

Are they able to benifit from this? I know a lot of people whose companies are laying off but may not be in a hard hit industry!


James
said

What highly coveted skills would those be? I know, I know, the highly coveted skills often found in the call centers that have taken over as main employers in many small towns.
"Hello, how may I direct your call to a highly coveted skilled employee?"

What they should do is start buying the raw material like lumber and farm products and start building affordable housing for low income Canadians and giving food banks farm products to distribute to unemployed and low income Canadians while they wait for those highly coveted jobs to come along.


Kevin in Alberta
said

Government should have to CUT useless Government jobs when times get tuff, just like a real buisness. Government is our biggest exspense next too all the needy Social programs. Everyone knows once you are in the government you are laughing all the way to the bank, all parties, even the ones who don't have any seats. Green Party, just a bunch of protesters, that get paid now!


Ernie in Kamloops
said

A small but steady income for the unemployed is the best way to support the economic activity of local buisnesses. Workers should not loose their homes or be forced to move to more expensive realestate in a boom area. We need to keep them in their houses and keep their homes off the market untill housing prices stabilise. We need to keep their kids in their schools, not displace them to a new area where the schools are not yet built. This economy needs stability. Supporting workers and families is a good start.


Dave Alberta
said

What about the small businesses suffering in recession or workers in laid off by small businesses etc. Probably no help again, not even EI for businesses, nothing.
In this province, the very high paid oil workers who benefited by high oil prices have spent & have not saved anything will benefit yet again, while the rest of us pay more and receive nothing.
Probably the same in Ontario where auto workers will benefit at the expense of others.
Any programs or benefits should be for all!!!


Mike B
said

Thats great.
Not!!!!!!
The government has the 2nd career training as well as several other programs set up for people that have lost their jobs.
The problem is that by the time you have jumped through the hoops to get to these programs and waited for weeks and weeks to talk to the people that run the programs most people are so frustrated that they give up.
I am on lay off right now and have been since the end of Oct/2008. I want to go back for training in a career that is more stable than the manufacturing sector. But I have basically been told to hurry up and wait.
I still ahve to find a job to pay the bills and feed my kids in the mean time and when or if I get approved for retraining I have to quit my job to qualify.
Again I am back in the same situation as I am now.
I dont want a hand out but wouldnt it make sense to offer these programs and still allow the people to work?
I think the government needs to sit down and rethink these programs before they get people all excited only to find out later that they wont qualify.


Kris
said

Yet more of my tax dollars that I will NEVER see a return on....

How about giving the average person a break...straight across the board, with no conditions?


Mike
said

Invest this money in new green technology that will create new jobs. If they can do it in Europe why can't we do it in Canada!! Harper is no different than Bush, he only speaks better.
Never voting Conservative again!!


GJ
said

who's going to hire a 'retrained' 40+ yr old person in todays tech based society , with no experience, at the same or close to rates as the union jobs they lost.

There's your reality.

Someone take the chequebook away from these fools.


Kevin also in Alberta
said

"Kevin in Alberta
Government should have to CUT useless Government jobs when times get tuff, just like a real buisness. Government is our biggest exspense next too all the needy Social programs. Everyone knows once you are in the government you are laughing all the way to the bank, all parties, even the ones who don't have any seats. Green Party, just a bunch of protesters, that get paid now!"

Actually government should be cut during the good times and let the private economy employ people and government spending should be increased in troubled times to make up for the private sector losses. The Green Party represents 1 million people in Canada.... but I guess you are too ignorant to realize this.




Mitch
said

A billion is not enough for the most vulnerable. Our society is on a dangerous trajectory with so many being excluded economically - they can't engage in spending that benefits local businesses, where we hope to maintain employment.

I've been "in between jobs" a number of times over the years after various contracts have expired - I have NEVER QUALIFIED FOR EI - even though I have ALWAYS paid into its pot! The rules are antiquated. They favor people who have already been lucky enough to have had full-time/permanent jobs - and DISCRIMINATE AGAINST people who juggle a complex work life with NO safety net.

A little fairness would be welcome. And a billion dollars is PEANUTS compared to the money going to banks, mining, & oil. In a con world, you help the fortunate become more fortunate.


Matt in NB
said

Wrong.. wrong... wrong. Creating this fund won't stimulate the economy.

Training people will cause people to spend more only in a couple of years assuming they can find work in the field they've been re-trained in.

Adding money to EI to help people who have been laid off survive, while admirable, only tows the line. It also doesn't cause people to increase spending.

We need incentives to create jobs or direct job creation - and/or direct payroll tax cuts so that people who are working will have more money available to get the economy up and running.


Michael Erskine-Little Current ON
said

Even with the economy in turmoil, there are a huge number of skilled trades positions that remain unfilled in this country. We need to upgrade the skills of the workforce, both so those jobs can be filled by Canadians and so we are ready to take advantage of the inevitable upswing in the business cycle.


Cassidy Kanata
said

This is a good step in the right direction. However I share the same concerns with Dave from Alberta. We really should learn to prepare ourselves for the bad times through normal savings. We have assistance programs in place for the temporary needy. Canadian economists have said the we really should not throw good resources at redundent or bad industries. I agree with that so lets really consider new sustainable industries and lead the way for that. You can use my tax dollars for industrial development and training and of course our deteroiorating infrastructure where we will all benifit.


Roger in Ottawa
said

I am a federal government employee who is near to pension. I don't want the federal government putting us into the red with social programs that don't work and only put us back two decades to the PET era. I want to pay low taxes so I can enjoy my retirement.


Not laid off because I gots myself skills...!
said

Yep, all the "what about me" comments are coming out. If you got laid off but your industry isn't "hard hit", then likely you should be able to find another job in that industry. If not, then maybe you're not skilled enough, so go get the training that the gov't offers. Stop reading these articles in the middle of the day, and look for another job or go to school!!


Rosie
said

Why don't they just tap into the 45-50billion in the EI fund?Oh yeah ,that went into general coffers to pay for other gov't crap.Kevin from Alberta is right,cut government jobs,let them feel the pain,too.I also don't want my tax dollars going to top up pension funds for the entitled auto or public servants.sigh,you know it will happen.Anyone care to guess when Canada goes bankrupt?


livy ont
said

Harper must get at least some of the message out to the people. The coalition are super anti what ever the cons say. The media likes controversy and very likely will spend far less time helping Canadians understand the budget and spend far too much time letting the coalition bash it. Harper---TELL US MORE!!!


Ki-Som Victoria BC
said

This is nuts!!! Harper, and his missfits, don't have a clue on what is going on and have no solid plan what so ever. They are just throwing money out there, thinking that this is going to solve everything. All the hard work that the Liberals have done, to build up surpluses and paying down the debit, are now gone out the door. This is a bloody nightmare.


kate
said

I'm not a big fan of these retraining programs either. I was downsized several years ago and I asked about the retraining they (Ontario) were offering at the time and was told because I was already college educated that I did not qualify, even though my industry was dying. The programs were only for people who had high school education or those who had dropped out. The programs they offered were also not real ones at a recognized college or university - it was more like the 6 month speed training at some unheard of school that I'm guessing probably wouldn't get you a decent job as not many people will hire you unless you attend a known college or university. So it will be interesting to see if this is what they will offer people this time or will they offer them a real chance at starting over.


Kevin
said

Iggy is accusing Harper of playing political games? For real? Pot, meet kettle.


Mike from Nova Scotia
said

As someone involved in the process to retrain people, I think it is great when the Government wants to help out with more money in the pot. With all of the changes over the past few years in the funding for Skill Development through EI this money will ensure that those people effected most by this downturn will not be taking money away from others who need it too. When you add more people to a system that is already incapable of helping everyone who needs it you create an even more dire situation. I'm glad that the Harper Government has recognized this and taken steps to move on it. One big thing to remember in all of this is that they were the ones who started making changes and shrink the pot when they took office in the first place.


Joe in Ontario
said

Why all the leaks about the budget right now? I thought everything about the budget was supposed to be kept secret until its release? First the deficit, then this program. What's coming tomorrow, and the next day???


Denise
said

This is all completely unnecessary and it is unfortunate that Harper has been pressured to bring in this Ontario/Quebec fantasy budget courtesy of the 3 stooges and their disgraceful "Coalition government" antics.


tired.
said

Give Me a billion dollar bail out and You would never worry about Me again...
The working poor will bail the lazy and ineffiecent out again..



1 Billion questionable logical.
said

What's up with these "1 Billion Jackpot" announces from him?

I noticed that Harper usaully give out certain number for whatever groups who need money but almost never got it.

Example, "1 Billion dollar for farmer"

Never see that it actually helped farmer or did ever reach to farmer since farmers still are protesting "FARMER FEED CITIES"

I think it is just that he did it to make him look like a good leader but I doubt it 1 billion is going to help.

1 billion isn't that alot in these days with price rising.

I rather see 1 billion goes to something that actually help improve all canadian living quality such as food cost.

Rent cost.

Etc Etc. Homeless need helps too!

Don't forget rednecks too.


George Poole in Lunenburg
said

Well this is all well and good as long as the recession does not deepen and lengthen, when the $ runs out my oh my, it will be like: "where are my entitlements?" - I guess that's when we will start paving the streets with gold.


Glen from Bancroft
said

If the Gov't had stepped up to the plate a few years ago and gave incentives to companys to keep people in house versus companys farming out jobs overseas we would not be in as bad shape as we currently are.


Jared
said

This is UNFAIR!! They should not receive any money outside the norm just like everyone else!!! When I lost my job I didn't get any special treatment.


Paul in what used to be Liberal Brant
said

Too funny! Ignatieff talking about doing things 'by the rules'.
This guy honestly believes the sun rises and sets on him, the Fiberal Party and everthing left of centre.


Chris in Ontariariari-Oh!
said

It would be good to see extra financing available for worker's affected by the downturn.To use this for re-training would definitely help if it targetted toward's industry's that require the worker's.There is alway's a demand in trade's and if people get the training after this is over they could maybe get into a good paying job.People affected by this should not hold back if there is something you can take by all mean's, Take It.There may not be another chance to get training paid for like this and you could miss the boat and end up in some low paying job or with no tangible job prospect.There may be the need to pick up stake's but you have to do what is best for your family.This will turnaround so the most you can get out of the government in assisted training will only help you when it does.There are a lot of people retiring from the trade's over the next few year's and it would be a good opportunity.You are better off riding this out in a classroom than waiting for the cheque to come.


More tax cuts for Middle Class
said

Sounds more like a socialist ideal than a conservative approach to stimulating the economy. How come the media continues to give more print and sounds bytes to this Iggy guy. I see the Liberals still haven't learned from thier huge defeat last election. Different leader, same speech writers, same political insiders.
The more Iggy talks, the more I dislike him, the more I think PET era of overtaxation and massive debt.
Good luck Mr.Harper, your dealing with idiots in the opposition...


Ron in Moncton
said

Kudos to Denise for see the real problem. The 3 stooges did not want a non-strike clause, did not want money taken out of their party funds and wanted Harper to run a deficit. Ignatief is nor more a leader than whats his name Dion. Their advisors run the show while they where the perfume.

Good Grief


Joel - Edm
said

You know what Iggy? I don't support cuts to the lowest tax bracket and increases to the middle and upper tax brackets. I don't work hard to give it all aways to the government. So maybe we should all aspire to do less so we can all be in the lowest tax bracket. I'm not saying everyone in the lowest tax bracket is there by choice. But there has to be some incentive to work harder.


Playing by the Rules ?
said

Iggy, you can't have it both ways. You squealed when Harper played within the rules to perogate parliament. Now you expect him to listen to your demand to play by budget rules.

When all is said and done, regardless of the posturing, if Iggy votes down any budget at this time, he is just proving his incompetency.

I'm not sure yet who is the most arrogant - Iggy, Layton, or Scott Brimstone, (Brison).

Lately, I think Brison is the leading know-it-all.


Larry in Wpg
said

If they are really serious about boosting the economy and fixing the housing crisis, give every Canadian half a million bucks. Instant fix at a fraction of cost of what they are proposing to waste. The Obama type bailout proposal isn't working for the U.S. and it won't work here.


John in Vernon B.C.
said

Sounds great AND has anyone given consideration to where we find the instruction capacity to meet the needs of the throngs of displaced workers that will be looking to upgrade or take on a new skill?
I concur with the individual that noted that finacial support for people in their own small communities in order to keep their homes and feed their families would be very effective.A dollar spent in a community
will circulate up to sven times providing considerable economic stimulus for that community.It seems to me that is the way to go!


Alysha Ont
said

My my... is Iggy the Pm or is it Harper? Sounds like Iggy is telling Harper what to do again. Iggy tells Mr Harper not to let the facts and figures slip out at Mr Harper's convenience?? What is the difference as it's all coming out on Monday anyway! Such pettiness and Iggy still won't support the budget. Wonder what suggestions he contributed?
WE need to get rid of the stooges.. gilles, jacky and iggy.


Barb
said

Well here we go again damned if he does damned if he don.t what makes everybody think the Government should be handing out money to find a job I think the blame should lie where it happened not on Mr Harper shoulders I have to laugh at Iggy Trying to act like Obama, you can't even come close Iggy. so don't try.


Faramir
said

Cause government is so great at retraining people - right. 1 billion is a lot of money for this.

How about giving that to people who fight for our country - like better pay for military families?


Peter
said

Will the goverment change the requirments and length of unemployment insurance progam for regular Canadian in these times.They shoveled truck loads of money to the rich bankers are they going to help the people who lost their jobs by giving them more benifits - not likely its a cash cow for the goverment and if they don't it proves that they don't care about regular Canadians who have lost their jobs.This is what is needed right now to help the people who have lost their jobs.And remember it was th Liberals who canged the plan to what it is now.


Bill in BC
said

This is just another demonstration of TOO MUCH liberal input, NDP demands, green manuer, and bloc obstructionism in responsible government. None of this is really neccesary but for the sake of having a working government the country is held hostage and placed into debt to cater to them.

Here's an idea: lets just have an election and let the population speak-lets have a conservative majority so we can put this crap to rest.


Wayne
said

There you go. Proof positive that Conservative ideology is dead. This type of fund is what should be created during GOOD TIMES so that an economic downturn can be tackled without deficit spending. The conservatives are unable ideologically to plan such a fund during the good times, yet blindly they adhere to a no deficit ideology. They would operate on a shoestring budget and when a downturn like this occurs, we would be screwed, the Iceland of North America we would become. Harper is no economist, he is just a conservative hack who believes he and his grin entrenched finance minister know what is best. They can't even distinguish an economic downturn from growth. Now they beg and plead for ideas from anyone even the NDP and then they will ignore the best ideas, claim the rest as their own and blame everyone else for any policies that they do implement which fail. I teach my kids to take responsibility and use Harper as an example of someone who skirts his duties, obligations and responsibilities.


Les in BC
said

Are there any bet takers who would care to bet where the bulk of this money will end up?

Province by province, who wants to dare break it down?


canuckistani
said

To my Alberta friends: which programs do you want to cut to get to 30B? Farm subsidies. Hmm. Aboriginal subsidies. Hmm. Energy subsidies. Hmm. Immigration subsidies. Hmm. Public service employees for northern development. Hmm.
I guess those are tough ones when you look at the services being rendered for issues close to the heart. Get real. Canadians have voted time and again for the programs we have. We're at fault and addicted to nanny-governments. Our US friends have also embraced the nanny, so what hope do we have? Smile and be happy, folks.


Working poor
said

The hard working poor bail out the rich, lazy and unionized!

This system needs to be changed.


glen Ontario
said

If the Gov't plans on creating more skilled jobs,this would mean nothing long term if the jobs were to be moved over seas?????


Valerie in Brantford
said

Once again, they're taking care of the high paid workers and high skilled employees just like the coalition wanted! All the rest of us can go to hell!


David in Exeter
said

I'm self employed and feeling the tightening like others - where's my helping hand??


Mal
said

When taking out the grants, remove ALL retraining programs. The programs do not provide what the employers are looking for and they are limited to certain schools only, and those schools are far from the best. 28 hours of training [as part of a larger course] on changing a propane tank [A Forklift trainer would need 1 hour only]. Put the money towards subsidizing employment with a mandatory rule that ANY company receiving ANY subsidy can not lay off workers without an independent hearing.


iggy and the stooges
said

i laid all my staff off at the end of november. i'll be calling all of them back to work in march/april. one of the guys that works for me is getting training in something else right now but he'll be back.

i laid off 4 people for seasonal reasons back when 70,000 lay offs for the month was big news.

i'd like stats can to release how many canadians really hold a job. unemplotment is at about 6% here in halifax, i find it hard to believe that nine in ten people hold jobs. us working people are getting it up the XXX. even if unemployment reaches 10% nationally, come on. 30 million canadians. how many actually leave the house every day and go to work. nobody in my family does(either retired or children) my sister has a job. thats it. her lowlife husband should do well under the guise of helping out the lowest and most vulnerable.

i'm sick. how many people actually have jobs?


M M B Ont
said

Ki-Som Victoria BC
This is nuts!!! Harper, and his missfits, don't have a clue on what is going on and have no solid plan what so ever. They are just throwing money out there, thinking that this is going to solve everything. All the hard work that the Liberals have done, to build up surpluses and paying down the debit, are now gone out the door. This is a bloody nightmare.

Do you even have a clue on how the Liberals spent the taxpayers money?? On useless submarines that had holes in them and leaked, the sponsorship scandal and the list goes on. And they got their surplus by taxing us Canadians and downloading services to the Provinces and the municipalities. Cuts to hospitals and education and sending our soldiers to war without proper equipment. This is how the good ol Liberals treat the citizens of this country and I forgot to mention taking all that money from the EI pot and directing it elsewhere and making it more difficult for a hard working person to collect EI when laid off work and then at a rate of only 55 % of his wage. Yesss... these are the great things those fine Liberals have done for the Canadians !!! Wake up and smell the coffee !!!


Gary Thunder
said

I billion dollars for a Canada wide program?? Do I not remember last spring, at this time, when Harper passed out 10 billion dollars to the provinces from the EI surplus for exactly the same thing???
Was there a public accounting of how that money was spent, and who received it? Is this what we are to expect every year from the Conservatives? Sounds more like vote buying to me, at the public expense, on the backs of our kids.


Steve the Pundit
said

What we should be doing is giving incentives to people to start their own businesses and CREATE new jobs and new industries, rather than teaching people new skills that they would be laid off from in three years.

How about a two-year GST holiday on business inputs for start-ups, and a three-year holiday on income and payroll taxes? Or do we not people to become entrepreneurial and look after themselves?


Musty
said

Ignatieff should wait and see what is actually in the budget instead of whining and complaining.


Norm Ontario
said

If Ignatief keeps up his "holier than thou" verbiage, (below) he will definitely "shoot himself in the foot". It sounds shrill, arrogant and similar to what he accuses the Prime Minister of doing - "playing games". In my opinion, it will ring hollow in the long term and may backfire.

e.g. "I asked Mr. Harper not to play games like that," he said Friday.

"I told him: 'Put the facts and figures on the table.' Don't let them slip out at his convenience.' But the guy just can't help himself."

I find this comment, particularly demeaning - not to the Prime Minister but to Igantieff.



Mike from Toronto
said

Im starting to have doubt all this debt we are creating will EVER be repaid. Keynesian economics clearly is flawd as governments are never able to fully repay all debts during boom times. Sooner or later this system will crack. We cannot just borrow into infinity.


Patricia
said

Although it may not be popular, it would appear that the coalition forced Stephen Harper to take another look at what he could do for the faltering economy...which he denied even existed during the election campaign. If nothing else, the coalition has given Harper a reality check; he has no idea about how to govern and do the best for Canadians unless he is backed into a corner. We have to thank the coalition for forcing him to rethink the options.


Goldens
said

Since when was Iggy given the authority to tell the Prime Minister what to do! Good start for the budget. This was a traditional role of Government before the Liberals cut funding to these types of programs.

John Wilson
Bridgetown NS


Doug BC
said

I'm not really a big fan of this kind of bail out.But I can live with it,as long as it gets done properly.I dpon't want to see a bunch of "seat warmers" occupying those training spots.IOf we get more skilled trades people that can actualy support themselves in the future we,and our economy will see the benifits if,or when the recession comes to an end,and the need for skilled people out strips the supply.
Right now,Public Transit in Vancouver is lookong for ways to get the Commercial Transport Mechanics it sorely needs.FROM JAMAICA PEOPLE!!
This should not be going on now.We need to get our own citizens filling these jobs.They provide above average incomes,and very steady workUnemployment rates in BC are still fairly low,so far.But I know for sure there are people who are out of work,and have been for a long time.
We need to quit whining about our personal situations and get off our collective butts and GET TO WORK.Help to those willing to help themselves is a good investment.Help for those waiting for ongoing handouts is money wasted,
Oddly,the same people complaining about a budget deficit,are also crying for more "free" money and more "social" spending give-a-ways.
There is NO FREE anywhere in this country.Just some people using tax dollars that someone else had to pay.
If you are not still a child,are not elderly,or are not disabled,you have no excuse not to be doing something to earn your keep.It is inapropriate for you to expect taxpayers to support you.I don't mind helping the willing,but I am sick to death of helping those who won't lift a finger on their own behalf.



Sick of the Canadian Government
said

Where the heck is this money going to come from? Oh that's right the tax payers pocket! I'm sick of this pathetic government and quite frankly the hard hit workers need to receive better payments from EI instead of being hit with more taxes to pay to this incompetent government.


Madatgovernmentagain
said

WHAT?

What about everyone else who lost there job and needs to retrain my husband got nothing when he got laid off from Dofasco


Raj
said

Good work PM Harper.I approve of what you are doing.If there is an election, you have my vote, and those of my family.


Cory-Toronto
said

Ki-Som, my friend. It is the Liberals and NDP that is pushing this more than the Conservatives or they will bring them down. If Harper had a majority this country wouldn't be blackmailed into spending this much.
You can't have it both ways, Ki-Som. Harper waited, and didn't want to spend. If one knows anything about Harper, you know this is making his skin crawl. He is actually trying to work with them. Do you not remember the throne speach? The Libs/Bloc/NDP coalition said that there wasn't enough spending. BY BILLIONS. Please, let's keep our eye on the ball. Seems many have a very short memory for convenience.
Oh and one more thing, Harper brought down the debt by 40 billion in 2 years. Hardly squandering the surplus, as some would have us believe.


JP,CD,CPM in North Saanich
said

Mr Harper-
if you can help the Auto workers, and plan to spend$1 billion assistance fund to help workers in struggling industries as part of its upcoming budget on Jan. 27.
What about the Veterans of this country, and the seniors who have worked and paid taxes all their lives to have the likes of you and you band of clowns run the countires into debt and disoriginazation.
You will liek Mulroney set Canad so far back that it will take ages to fix yoru mess-
your report card is presently at C-
Get you act to -gether or call an election




Brian in Sarnia
said

Well, I went to school and have paid on my loans for 8 years already. My industry tanked years ago, leaving me without the better income to pay the loans back and raise a family, so I've incurred more debt just meeting the daily needs. My wife answered the "call for teachers" by getting loans to become a teacher and has spent six years since getting stable work. There was no bail out for me, and still isn't. I work an average of 60 hours per week, mostly as a small business owner and juggle two kids and two dying parents between my wife and I. There is still no bail out for me. That's fine. I'm willing to upgrade my skills, to fill a skilled position so I can earn enough to pay off my loans.

I would benefit if I had just one of the following... low cost safe daycare, student loan forgiveness or free classes to upgrade my skills. Since I've been independently employed and employing others, I get no benefits of EI or government training programs. I'm 33 and I know my circumstances are actually quite common, so I would like just one single politician to listen to an average Canadian and see if you can come up with a solid plan to help a regular guy.


John Toronto
said

We need the government to save us! We are unable to make simple life decisions. We complain about the high interest on credit cards. Let's see, zero monthly balance, living within your means would equal how much interest due? Help us Mr. Government, we are incapable of functioning. Let us live beyond our means and then provide us with universal daycare so both husband and wife can go to work to pay off those overrun credit cards and debts. Did I say we bought one of those big ego filling SUVS with an 8 cylinder fuel sucking engine? I thought I was satisfying the 'eco'. My bad. Build something in my community Mr. Government, (but not a prison), so I don't have to move somewhere in Canada where there are still jobs. Heck I'm from Toronto and I'll damn well stay here until the Leafs win! They will win, won't they Mr. Government? Could you subsidize them? They are representative of under achieving Canadians, aren't they?


Dani - Alberta
said

I have learned these past few weeks that no matter what Stephen Harper and his Conservatives do, people will complain. The fact of the matter is, there really is no good way to get ourselves out of the recession, and certainly no chance that everyone in Canada will agree on anything.
I'm not a big fan of this plan, but I've learned that me not liking it does not automatically make it a bad idea.


Negative income tax: guaranteed annual income
said

for every adult Canadian citizen who files income tax return.




Jim Saskatoon
said

And once more hear them whine like big baby's. Please Mr. Ignatieff if you have nothing good to say please be quiet. I, like many more true Canadians do not appreciate your continous whining about what ever the Conseratives are doing. Who are you to say what is right or wrong with how the government releases economic information to the public?

Come Tuesday when the budget is read in the House, please put Canada ahead of the Liberal Party and listen to what is proposed. Support and work with the government, and help provide some stability during these rough times. In due course an election will be called and then you can present your case to Canadians.

In the meantime please learn how to say I'm a Canadian, not an American.


k m
said

1 billion for workforce retraining is helpful... but yeesh, can't help but wonder how the ginourmous 33 billion be spent this year?

one year, 1 billion... what month in this year will we Canadians start to feel the results and relief, from the conservatives proposed expenditure of this billion dollars??

Thanks!


Richard from Ontario
said

So the Liberal leader says he doesn't support broad tax cuts in the budget.
Well, why doesn't that surprise me... For those old enough to remember the Fonz on Happy Days, he couldn't say sorry.. it was ssss. Well it is the same with Liberals when they try to say tax cuts. ttttt. Tax and spend is the Liberal mantra.


Garry in NS
said

Re-training people for new jobs is a good idea but will only work in large urban centres. What about people in rural areas and small towns. What are you going to train them for and where are they going to work if the primary industry in their areas is closed? What we need is a revamping of EI so that the waiting period is eliminated and the EI payments are drastically increased.


FRED
said

Great finally money to be retrained.I,ll get trained by someone thats half my age and making 20,00 an hr and I,ll get a job for 10,00 an hr.

Makes Canadian sense to me.




Harper knows he won't win a majority
said

and probably will not win a minority.

But he can't resist his compulsion to play politics.




Jasper
said

It is funny to watch the socialists bash a socialist program.

C.A.V.E.

"Citizens Against Virtually Everything"


Budget leaks allow unfair advantage to investors
said

It gives them advance information.

What other confidential information is Harper leaking to his corporate cronies?




Frustrated...
said

I dont think this country should go into debt over anything other than infrastructure, which would create jobs. However, I dont think that people would be happy with anything that Harper does. When he attempted to cut party funding to save money we ended up with the whiney coalition idiots. Think this recession/depression should be a wake up call for everyone to learn to live within their means, instead of the instant gratification society we have become. The US is virtually throwing money away with "bailouts" and it is getting them nowhere fast. I really dont think Canada should make the same mistakes and that taxpayers should have to pay for them...


Jeanne B.C.
said

I suggest that the hours needed for EI be cut back. I have worked for the same company for 25 years and although I am only suppose to work 10 hours a week (usually more)and I am paid salary when I needed to take some time off for medical reasons I could not collect EI because I didn't work 600 hours in that year but I still have to pay into it even though I can't collect it. Why is that?


Jennifer
said

Now I don't want to sound jealous or anything but perhaps they can think of the 20 something year olds who are grauduating college/University and won't be able to invest in anything until their loans are paid off (its time to invest now everything is low). A $1B fund for hard-hit students, now that sounds more like it.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

CTV Video Player

CTV's On The HIll

On the Hill

The Tories release budget details while the Liberals go on the offensive.

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz