Health -
News Sections
'Third-hand smoke' awareness may curb home smoking
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(70)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Jan. 6 2009 8:38 AM ET
A new study suggests that making the public aware of the dangers of "third-hand smoke" -- the toxic gases and particles that linger on smokers and on furniture -- may motivate people to enforce a strict no-smoking policy at home.
Researchers behind the study, published in the January edition of the journal Pediatrics, are believed to be the first to have coined the term "third-hand smoke."
The study says children are especially susceptible to third-hand smoke exposure because they breathe near, crawl and play on, touch, and mouth contaminated surfaces.
It says children exposed to low levels of tobacco, such as through third-hand smoke, have "the steepest slope in the decrement in reading levels" -- suggesting that compounds in tobacco smoke can be poisonous to nerve tissue, even at extremely low levels.
Researchers assessed health beliefs of adults regarding third-hand smoke exposure of children and whether smokers and non-smokers differ in their views.
Overall, 65.2 per cent of nonsmokers versus 43.3 per cent of smokers agreed that third-hand smoke harms children.
Researchers also found that a respondent who felt that third-hand smoke was harmful was much more likely to enforce a strict no-smoking policy at home.
"This novel finding is important because the third-hand smoke concept could easily be incorporated into current and future tobacco counselling messages, tobacco control programs, policy initiatives, and guidelines," says the study.
The study found no independent association between the belief that second-hand smoke harms the health of children and rules prohibiting smoking in the home and car.
"New information emerging about third-hand smoke exposure may offer families needed additional information about sources of possible toxic exposure of their children and may enhance their motivation to alter home smoking practices to protect better the health of their children," says the report.
"Third-hand smoke health education campaigns might be more powerful motivators for these families than simply reiterating information about visible second-hand smoke exposure that most families already know."
Among other toxins, third-hand smoke contains arsenic (used in pesticides), lead, carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide (used in chemical weapons).
Of 2,000 eligible respondents contacted, 1,510 (87 per cent) completed surveys, 1,478 (97.9 per cent) answered all questions pertinent to this analysis, and 273 (18.9 per cent) were smokers.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(70)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
DANIEL H
said
Joanne, Ottawa
said
Sault Ste. Marie Ron
said
Tina
said
Unfortunately, most people have the "It will never happen to me" attitude, until they realize that the asthma that brings their child to the emergency room in the middle of the night could be directly related to their smoking.It's time to wake up.
Gee
said
Smitherenzes
said
Alberta has a no smoking in the workplace law. One would think it was to protect coworkers. But wait, police, yes city police, were stopping semis and ticketing the driver if he/she were smoking in the truck, the truck being their workplace. Even if they were alone.
Not a health issue but a control issue. Time to get the state out of our lives.
Third hand smoke victim.
said
Ewen Lasalle
said
Mike
said
DJKoop, Manitoba
said
M Jones
said
Quilty in Ottawa
said
Wait until the tax revenues run dry from tobacco taxes and the government starts heavily taxing alcohol. Then the drinkers of the world will be responsible for all the major ills.
Kenneth S. Fort Worth, TX
said
I wonder if someone will pay me to do a study on how fecal matter fills the house after a toilet flush. Also, we need to stop non smokers from shedding skin cells. It's covering everything around them, choking the lungs of their precious children. Filthy beasts!
Amanda, Kingston
said
Livid Smoker
said
Nathan
said
Di from Sudbury
said
Mark
said
Bob in Ottawa
said
There is just to much in the way of taxes for both the Provincial and Federal Governments.
I quit six years ago and have never felt better.
medman1
said
Ban smoking for good! Period!
said
Let's ban smoking everywhere, anywhere and at anytime to the benefit of all living creatures.
The money save can then be used to prevent other deseases or stimulate an economy that really needs it.
D.K. lindsay
said
ARE THEY ALL NUTS.
We have managed to make smoking an activity that is to be done outside only and 9 meters from any door way and also make sure that we do not have a shelter for them of any kind.This is so we can can laugh at them. We want to make smoking in a car illegal and we can not even manage to stop drinking and driving or talking on a phone and driving and so how will we deal with third-hand , fourth-hand smoke in vehicles, homes etc.. I wonder where I could get funding to see it the polar ice cap melting can be blamed on smokers too.
Let the government make this product illegal and provide assistance to those who need it to break the habit.This will finally end the constant harrassement of smokers in this country.
Nina, Edmonton
said
Smoking parents are abusive...
said
As Daniel said above, if they don't care about their own well being, what is to suggest they'll care about the health of others?
While I do believe that it is a personal decision, I think that smokers should be held responsible for the outcomes of their poor judgement. For example, smokers should pay premiums for health care.
I also think that the key word in the "freedom of choice" argument that most smokers make is "choice." - It should be illegal to smoke in a home occupied by others unless they are informed consenters.
Any parent that smokes in a home with children should be charged with ABUSE. After all, while a guardian that hits their child is hurting a child momentarily (and should be punished harshly), a parent who smokes with a child at home is hurting them forever and contributing to the early death of their child. There will never be a valid argument that a parent who smokes inside a home with their child cares deeply about that childs well being.
PGH
said
Theresa Graham(Sudbury)
said
Evan
said
This peculiar obsession with smoking as the worst sin of the century is getting on my nerves. There are many other behaviors far worse and just as damaging as smoking and are completely ignored. How about alcohol? How about common street drugs? How about caffeine?
Pam, Ottawa
said
Mat
said
scents in this list.Those that push to continue on this ridiculous, self appointed cruisade are stealing our rights away! If only they would be as zealous with air pollution from big biz,aspartame or fluoride instead of attacking individuals. BUt no, they don't even mention those and to me that proves that it is nothing but propaganda and troublemaking.
Some people just cannot l ive in peace, and mind their own business. If you don't like smoke, stay home, in a bubble!! There are worst poisons (sulfur, mercury, lead) being pumped in the air by your friendly neighbourhood manifature plant and/or cars driving in front of your house!
Susan
said
I would have loved to have this report five years ago when my mother insisted I come to her house that absolutely stunk of smoke with my baby instead of coming hear to see him. She wouldn't believe me that her house that reaked of smoke would have any effect of him if she wasn't smoking right beside him...yet he even stunk of smoke when I got him home. Her denial cost seeing him until he was over one. I don't care if you smoke; don't expect me to come visit and this is why.
T.H.
said
Kevin, Ontario
said
Maj. Norman W. MacIver, CD (Ret)
said
3rd hand smoker champ
said
I figure if "3rd hand" smoke is damaging your fragile body that much, something else will probably kill you anyway. On second thought, something is gonna kill all of us sooner or later whether you opt to smoke or go to the gym every day. I often picture the people out for a jog as people who are trying to run away from their mortality.
Mel
said
I wonder... if everyone quit smoking this instant and never bought another pack... what would the state of our already strained healthcare system be?
Jak
said
All the bible thumping anti smokers that I run into these days, strangely enough are actually ex smokers. Now that they have had success with kicking the habit, they seem to be on a rampage to make others do as they have done. Ironically enough though some of these same people have been known to *sneak* the occasional drag.
What makes me wonder is are these researchers by any chance the same ones who used to tell us that smoking was safe and enjoyable. Are the physicians the same ones who were once paid to endorse cigarette campaigns, perhaps the nurses are the same ones who used to allow parents to spark a cigar in delivery rooms. So while everyone bashes the smokers lets all remeber that the MEDICAL PROFESSIONS used to encourage and allow public smoking to occur, simply because smoking was deemed SAFE through research and development.
Now R & D says they changed their mind... opps turns out smoking is actually dangerous.
Now researchers complain that smokers are a drain on the health care system, yet I've met plenty of people who have never smoked a cigarette in their life,and they are always sick. We don't charge drunk drivers for their rehab expenses after they paralized themselves, so why would we charge smokers for this?
Hate being around stinky smoke suckers
said
Smoke suckers are harming our society with their disgusting foulo habit. 48% of tobacco products sold in Ontario are illegal so we know that they are also contributing to the illegal traffic in contraband tobacco.
JUST QUIT...
Ryan
said
Parents who smoke in their homes and cars and have children are basically "abusing" their children and should be held accountable.
M Wunder , Ontario
said
Try worrying about the job loss, and the very poor instead of a smell. It may be uncomfortable but nobody dies from it!!!
Get a grip. We (as a smoker) had to stop smoking in puplic places now. WE DID! WE DIDN"T HAVE A SAY IN IT EITHER!
WE WERE TOLD!!!
What next? Maybe George Orwell was right.
Tom in Calgary
said
I don't smoke. I hope someone here can produce a link or line that shows me the "studies" "proving" second hand smoke has been written up as cuase of death on any death certificate. I suspect the studies of 2nd hand smoke are about as valid as the UNs IPCC climate change report.
Please find one so I can stand corrected. Even the famed waitress from Edmonton, who sadly died of lung cancer, can't be proven to have had her cancer initiated by second hand smoke. Its anecdotal. Sad but anecdotal.
Anti-smokers have rightfully won the high ground. Now get back to work.
Kevin
said
Followers parroting ad agency spin, are being painted as leaders, in the protectionist image of Lyndon Johnson, selling the cholesterol risk in eggs with no hint of science, is repeated by Governments signing a tobacco control treaty at the UN prior to the invention of second hand smoke.
Involving themselves in coercive and bigoted initiatives which encourage selective taxation which benefits the majority, while undermining the universality of healthcare in it's promotions.
Emotional blackmail "to protect the children" was Hitlers favorite campaign entitlement and is China's claim in their protection of Tibet.
Boston Legal could do an entire season revealing the hypocrisies of taxing an addiction, through distribution of junk science. The defense of Denny Crane's smoking his prized Cuban cigars on his corporate balcony, could have them rolling in the aisles and see acting awards for every member of the cast.
Hasn't this promotion of bigotry been around a little too long?
When a government provides a website targeting children and they call it stupid.ca, we are already well beyond the claim "children are being protected", rather than being taught the power of hatred.
Free at last
said
When you step back and look at it, smoking in a bizarre addiction that would seem ridiculous if we first encountered it in science fiction.
EMG
said
One of the ways people get along together is by being courteous. That means making an effort not to offend others and by helping others when we can. Whether or not you believe in the dangers of smoking, others shouldn't have to put up with your filthy habits, just as you shouldn't have to put up with theirs. Oh and by the way saying that people are discourteous in lots of other ways doesn't make any of it right. Put that in your mouth and smoke it - far away from me.
...montreal.
said
leave smokers alone, smokings been around way before many of these reaserchers were even born, weve come a long way with technology in hospitals and health care. maybe we should be concentrating on curing the sick instead of spending so much time trying to get people to break habbits they dont even want to break.
Anne
said
Kevin M
said
Now the bigots want to take their gains to a whole new dimension, intruding into others private homes and the relationships they have with their own children?
It is time the media groups selling this trash got back to the basics of their responsibilities, of taking out the trash.
Time they started considering the source and following the money.
This story was well advertised in the anti smoker circles and is over represented by their cult of droids and profiteers.
No one is buying it, outside of the "enlightened" [or entitled] few.
Hatred and fear mongering, are not a legal or morally acceptable forms of advertising it is time someone was convicted or sued.
Ontario Marion
said
NO THANK YOU!!
TrutH
said
To whiners that think its hard to quit. i just smoked for 19 yrs and told my brain enough is enough. GET SOME MIND CONTROL and quit. it really isn't that hard.
you think we have it bad, your pets have way more sensible sniffers. Imagine the damage its doing to them.
MLC
said
For those of you who are NOT affected in that manner, be glad of it. But please don't make light of a problem that, for some of us, is very serious. I realize that it's hard for smokers to stop and they have my sympathy. However, there is no way to justify their making those around them sick. A little consideration on their part rather than mockery re: how their smoke affects those around them would be appreciated. If you could only walk a mile in my shoes . . . .
George in Ontario
said
Get a Metabolism
said
Smoking and drinking killed my wife's father. He was 87.
george
said
Perfumes that people wear. Now that really stinks. ( being allergic). Out gasing of carpets, cleaning products; outgasing of new homes (plywoods, glues, insulation, paints),cars, clothes. As you said (third hand smoke victim)cigarettes stinks but we all stink. More studies should be done on these other items. You may find that they maybe more lethal than third hand or even second hand smoke. The studies are too narrow minded. The more negative findings the more money that is poured into it's research leaving less for other enviromental toxins. Don't become so narrow minded. It all counts. More than you think.
Johnnie Oil
said
T in BC
said
Oh right, because they make a lot of money in taxes on every package sold.
jesshahabtown
said
Just killing themselves slowly.
...
Children are more important than getting a nicotine high..
So is our environment..
PB in QC
said
I'm an ex-smoker, and know to well that all this outrage is just making excuses for weak, selfish behaviour. Wake up and look in the mirror. I did.
John Amos
said
Angus
said
Mannie N.S.
said
Product of Baby Boomer
said
The people of the fifties, sixties and seventies must have been really stupid right? These are the ones that hotboxed you in the car with harmful toxins and yes the ones that used their arm to shield you from flying through the window of the car in an accident. Did I forget to mention that these are the ones who thought fake milk from a can was a great subsitute for the breast? Baby Boomers - THE DEVISE OF THE CURRENT STATE OF THE WORLD. With their religious BS, Self Entitlement etc, etc and now it has rubbed off on GEN X'ers and the next in line. Wake up. Grab a brain. Quit your whining.
Sandi in BC
said
KC at Saskatoon
said
Charlie Brown
said
It's time for a reality check. Only a couple of generations ago we cooked and heated our homes with coal, wood, buffalo chips or anything else that would burn. Mankind not only survived, it flourished!
Now our homes are filled with toxins given off by plastics, particle board, synthetic fibers, electronics, etc, etc. No one seems to mind because the resulting "new home smell" is a reminder of how successful we are.
So back to reality... first hand smoke has risks, second hand smoke probably does too, but third hand smoke... Good Grief!
Dan from Northern Ont.
said
kate
said
Lynda
said
First the Anti smokers wanted smoke free planes, that was all. Then they wanted to just go "out" in a smoke free environment. Then it was everyone, in the public (can't let people put up signs)that needed protection; cause one wisp of a cigarette is "bad".
Now using a survey they can say "The study found no independent association between the belief that second-hand smoke harms the health of children and rules prohibiting smoking in the home and car." Yet according to "objective reporting", and "science"; its dangerous.
I'm drawing my line in the sand & saying you won't be able to take away any more private property rights using a wisp of smoke, and the lack of toxicology (science)!
Vatsal Shah
said
KD
said
Michael
said
The stench from his/her smoking habit simply covers the person and peels off them as they enter the space near me. The horrible stench is enough to make me feel ill to varying degrees. Usually I get a sore throat and a headache just by being near this person.
When I am able to do so I just move away to avoid these people. It's very sad because I don't have a personal issue with those people. It's just that the stench from their smoking habit is so foul it affects my health to be near them. The ill effects can last hours or the rest of the day. Who wants their day ruined by having to breathe in these poisons?
KD
said