CTV News | 'Third-hand smoke' awareness may curb home smoking

Health -   

'Third-hand smoke' awareness may curb home smoking

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Newsnet: Joan Friebely, study's co-author
CTV Newsnet: Rob Cunningham, senior policy analyst Canadian Cancer Society

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(70)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Jan. 6 2009 8:38 AM ET

A new study suggests that making the public aware of the dangers of "third-hand smoke" -- the toxic gases and particles that linger on smokers and on furniture -- may motivate people to enforce a strict no-smoking policy at home.

Researchers behind the study, published in the January edition of the journal Pediatrics, are believed to be the first to have coined the term "third-hand smoke."

The study says children are especially susceptible to third-hand smoke exposure because they breathe near, crawl and play on, touch, and mouth contaminated surfaces.

It says children exposed to low levels of tobacco, such as through third-hand smoke, have "the steepest slope in the decrement in reading levels" -- suggesting that compounds in tobacco smoke can be poisonous to nerve tissue, even at extremely low levels.

Researchers assessed health beliefs of adults regarding third-hand smoke exposure of children and whether smokers and non-smokers differ in their views.

Overall, 65.2 per cent of nonsmokers versus 43.3 per cent of smokers agreed that third-hand smoke harms children.

Researchers also found that a respondent who felt that third-hand smoke was harmful was much more likely to enforce a strict no-smoking policy at home.

"This novel finding is important because the third-hand smoke concept could easily be incorporated into current and future tobacco counselling messages, tobacco control programs, policy initiatives, and guidelines," says the study.

The study found no independent association between the belief that second-hand smoke harms the health of children and rules prohibiting smoking in the home and car.

"New information emerging about third-hand smoke exposure may offer families needed additional information about sources of possible toxic exposure of their children and may enhance their motivation to alter home smoking practices to protect better the health of their children," says the report.

"Third-hand smoke health education campaigns might be more powerful motivators for these families than simply reiterating information about visible second-hand smoke exposure that most families already know."

Among other toxins, third-hand smoke contains arsenic (used in pesticides), lead, carbon monoxide and hydrogen cyanide (used in chemical weapons).

Of 2,000 eligible respondents contacted, 1,510 (87 per cent) completed surveys, 1,478 (97.9 per cent) answered all questions pertinent to this analysis, and 273 (18.9 per cent) were smokers.

Comments are now closed for this story

DANIEL H
said

The problems others endure because of smokers will be around forever. If a smokers dosen't care about his/her own health, why would they be concerned about others or thier children. Making laws is of no use because non of them are enforced.


Joanne, Ottawa
said

Researchers HAVE to come up with new studies: "publish or perish." When and where will they find fourth-hand smoke? Not to worry, someone is probably working on that one right now.


Sault Ste. Marie Ron
said

Enough is enough! Stop this madness! If you don't like smoke, or smokers, that's good, they probably don't like you either, but at least they don't publish and document your B.O, and other smelliness. We have a lot more important things to worry about these days. Besides, the taxes these smokers pay is supposed to be going to healthcare to allow all you hypocondriacs to visit the emergency room on a daily basis.


Tina
said

As a nurse working in a small community NICU, we talk to parents about the effect of third hand smoke on a regular basis. Even being near their babies after being outside smoking can be harmful. The toxins in cigerettes cling to the fabric, and skin .
Unfortunately, most people have the "It will never happen to me" attitude, until they realize that the asthma that brings their child to the emergency room in the middle of the night could be directly related to their smoking.It's time to wake up.


Gee
said

One thing is for sure, third hand smoke stinks. There is no way to mask the smell of cigarette smoke, its in your cloths, your voice, your teeth and in your wrinkled skin.


Smitherenzes
said

This is no longer a health concern but a populace control issue.

Alberta has a no smoking in the workplace law. One would think it was to protect coworkers. But wait, police, yes city police, were stopping semis and ticketing the driver if he/she were smoking in the truck, the truck being their workplace. Even if they were alone.

Not a health issue but a control issue. Time to get the state out of our lives.




Third hand smoke victim.
said

Yes, in all seriousness, "Third Hand Smoke" sounds ridiculous! I am a non-smoker and can't stand the stuff personally, but I do agree that the lingering stench found on some somkers to be repugnant. I work in a large organization that caters to smokers (i.e. outdoor smoking areas) and when these co-workers return from their many much deserved smoke breaks, the stink coming off of them is nearly as bad as if they were actually smoking beside me. In some cases it just seems to linger for hours on them. It's a reality I made known to one specific co-worker, but he is in utter denial of this. "Third Hand Smoke"? Maybe not what I'd have called it, but its nice to hear its being recognized, and maybe in another lifetime it will be addressed! YOU GUYS STINK!!!


Ewen Lasalle
said

I don't smoke and hate smokers and their insistent smoke breaks everywhere but come on THIRD HAND SMOKE?...this is just silly harassment! Get a life. How exactly are we going to ban the way someone smells?


Mike
said

Since when do doctors use a person's conception as evidence rather than actual side effects. I cannot believe there is any hype on this.


DJKoop, Manitoba
said

Since I am a smoker I have always been curious about one thing. If smoking is so bad for everyones health and costs the government so much money. Why does the government not make tobacco products illegal and ban the substance completely? Or is the government addicted to the tax revenue?


M Jones
said

It is a wonder that any of us that grew up in the 50's, 60's & 70's when everyone smoked everywhere lived! Third hand smoke now - good Lord!


Quilty in Ottawa
said

Why don't they just shoot us all. We are only second class citizens as it is. It's a heavy burden ... being responsible for all the medical evils of the world.
Wait until the tax revenues run dry from tobacco taxes and the government starts heavily taxing alcohol. Then the drinkers of the world will be responsible for all the major ills.


Kenneth S. Fort Worth, TX
said

Yes, 4th and 5th hand smoke is sure to be next, but what I really worry about is 1025th hand smoke. It's a real bugger on your lawn! Save the blades!! OMG

I wonder if someone will pay me to do a study on how fecal matter fills the house after a toilet flush. Also, we need to stop non smokers from shedding skin cells. It's covering everything around them, choking the lungs of their precious children. Filthy beasts!


Amanda, Kingston
said

I am a smoker and have been for the past 10 years, I know that it harms the people around me and also myself.I had tryed to quit quite a number of times and of course failed, the patches,gum,pill, and the help line and changing your habits don't work for some people.Maybe instead of finding new ways on how it harms people(we get it, it hurts people no matter what)the researchers should be comming up with alternitive ways on how to help us quit.Smoking is just as addictive if not more than all those other illegal drugs, but yet we don't have a rehab center or go to AA meetings, it's more like here are some ads to tell you it's bad oh and use the patch you'll get over it!!.


Livid Smoker
said

This is starting to border on harrassment. They say we are a burden on the health care system, when the burden is actually car companies who charge outrageous prices for optional safety devices. I guess smokers are just easier targets.


Nathan
said

Third-hand smoke is complete BS. Anti-smoking advocates will not rest until nobody is allowed to smoke period. The only way I am going to get sick from third-hand smoke is if I rub my face in a smoker's jacket inhaling deeply several times a day for the next 15 years.


Di from Sudbury
said

No one seemed to care or believe me when exposed to third hand smoke triggers an asthma attack and pain in my lungs. This is a result of growing up with parents that were smokers. My father died of lung disease and I'm heading there myself.


Mark
said

We now have policies and sign campaigns in offices, on buses, and in other public places advising people to go easy on their perfumes and hairspray. Why don't these things also have the courage to address third-hand smoke? This is something that's far more repugnant. Some smokers need to learn some basic hygiene - such as washing their clothes once in a while.


Bob in Ottawa
said

Smoking will be around forever is right. Until the Federal Government outlaws it there will be no overall relief.
There is just to much in the way of taxes for both the Provincial and Federal Governments.
I quit six years ago and have never felt better.



medman1
said

I am still trying to figure out how second hand smoke is worse than first hand smoke. Now we have third hand smoke problems,I am certainly glad my job does not require I keeping looking for some danger in our everyday lives that is going to kill us all. The problem with these studies is they never give the whole story and they can make the numbers work for whatever it is they are trying to frighten us with now. I am a nonsmoker but I am tired of these so called experts looking for new ways to make headlines.


Ban smoking for good! Period!
said

First, second or third hand smoke are all deadly to us!

Let's ban smoking everywhere, anywhere and at anytime to the benefit of all living creatures.

The money save can then be used to prevent other deseases or stimulate an economy that really needs it.


D.K. lindsay
said

As a Non- smoker I have one comment only on the stupidity of this survey:

ARE THEY ALL NUTS.
We have managed to make smoking an activity that is to be done outside only and 9 meters from any door way and also make sure that we do not have a shelter for them of any kind.This is so we can can laugh at them. We want to make smoking in a car illegal and we can not even manage to stop drinking and driving or talking on a phone and driving and so how will we deal with third-hand , fourth-hand smoke in vehicles, homes etc.. I wonder where I could get funding to see it the polar ice cap melting can be blamed on smokers too.
Let the government make this product illegal and provide assistance to those who need it to break the habit.This will finally end the constant harrassement of smokers in this country.


Nina, Edmonton
said

Hmmmmm...I have an idea. Why don't we just put all the precious little darlings in a big plastic bubble, pipe in pure oxygen and not let them leave the house. Then they will be free from all kinds of smells, smoke, exhaust, gas, bad drivers and lousy weather. Personally, I used to sterilize everything that went near my kids faces until I saw them sitting on the lawn one day eating dirt. Guess what? It didn't hurt them or make them sick and probably strengthened their immune systems. Give me a break....Third hand smoke...geez. Get a life.


Smoking parents are abusive...
said

I'm not sure that any study will ever deter an addicted smoker.
As Daniel said above, if they don't care about their own well being, what is to suggest they'll care about the health of others?
While I do believe that it is a personal decision, I think that smokers should be held responsible for the outcomes of their poor judgement. For example, smokers should pay premiums for health care.
I also think that the key word in the "freedom of choice" argument that most smokers make is "choice." - It should be illegal to smoke in a home occupied by others unless they are informed consenters.
Any parent that smokes in a home with children should be charged with ABUSE. After all, while a guardian that hits their child is hurting a child momentarily (and should be punished harshly), a parent who smokes with a child at home is hurting them forever and contributing to the early death of their child. There will never be a valid argument that a parent who smokes inside a home with their child cares deeply about that childs well being.



PGH
said

Come on folks !! Get a life!! getting sick and tired of the perfumes out there!! A nice shower takes care of your smell so quit bathing in it!! This is my retaliation against the anti-smokers. And No, I actually don't like the smell of second hand nor third hand smoke either . What next are you going to ban after you are done and have taken the bee out of your bonnet about the smoking!! FOOD?? So we can all look & feel anorexic??


Theresa Graham(Sudbury)
said

Yes I beleive that third hand smoke is harmful.Why does the government even allow the sale of ciggarettes.If they were banned altogether,people would not smoke.When you are addicted it's very hard to quit and what about all those still smoking?


Evan
said

Let me clarify first that I am not a smoker.
This peculiar obsession with smoking as the worst sin of the century is getting on my nerves. There are many other behaviors far worse and just as damaging as smoking and are completely ignored. How about alcohol? How about common street drugs? How about caffeine?


Pam, Ottawa
said

We definitely need more awareness of this issue! It is not anything to do with "control", putting down smokers, etc. The health risks and effects are very well documented. As a Respiratory Therapist on staff at a regional hospital, I also teach CPR to clients of our neonatal intensive care unit and nursery. We discuss this issue in the class, as any manner of exposure to the chemicals from cigarettes is a risk for SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome), along with asthma, cancers and heart disease. Perhaps we shouldn't call it "third-hand smoke", though. Whether the chemicals are still suspended in the air, or reintroduced into the air after settling on objects, the fact is they are inhaled by the non-smoker. A child's lungs are not fully formed until the age of 8, and are more vulnerable, but these chemicals have a damaging effect at any age.


Mat
said

I'm not a smoker and cigarette smoke doesn't bother me. What bothers me is all those scented candles and air fresheners that are just as full of toxics. This whole cigarette smoke thing is going way to far and considering the other poisons in the air, especially in the city, I find it to be a whole bunch of biased propaganda and an infringement on individual rights.It is high hypocrisy to blame solely cigarete smoke and not other airborn chemicals or the lifestyle (sedentary)of the person.In other words it's dicrimination by extremists that can't look at the situation objectively and at least include other offensive
scents in this list.Those that push to continue on this ridiculous, self appointed cruisade are stealing our rights away! If only they would be as zealous with air pollution from big biz,aspartame or fluoride instead of attacking individuals. BUt no, they don't even mention those and to me that proves that it is nothing but propaganda and troublemaking.
Some people just cannot l ive in peace, and mind their own business. If you don't like smoke, stay home, in a bubble!! There are worst poisons (sulfur, mercury, lead) being pumped in the air by your friendly neighbourhood manifature plant and/or cars driving in front of your house!


Susan
said

Well this isn't even slightly surprising; although a better name would have been nice.

I would have loved to have this report five years ago when my mother insisted I come to her house that absolutely stunk of smoke with my baby instead of coming hear to see him. She wouldn't believe me that her house that reaked of smoke would have any effect of him if she wasn't smoking right beside him...yet he even stunk of smoke when I got him home. Her denial cost seeing him until he was over one. I don't care if you smoke; don't expect me to come visit and this is why.


T.H.
said

I am the son of two smokers and have a 15 year old daughter with mild asthma. She is otherwise very active and in great physical condition, regularly exceedind level 10 on the 20 MSR, the "beep test." (By comparison, Spec Ops needs a level 9 to pass). Yet when she spends time with my parents, who never smoke in their own home or cars and never around her, she quickly develops breathing problems from the lingering effects of the smoke. This is a very real problem, not the pleasure police looking for new ways to control vice.


Kevin, Ontario
said

OMG they came up with this from a survey and now want to use third hand smoke campaigns to keep them evil little smokers from spreading their toxins. I am so glad to see that so called professionals are creative enough in this troubling economic times to create more work for themselves lol. Next study will blame taco bell for killing the ozone layer due to over farting everyone must now hold it in or be fined lol.


Maj. Norman W. MacIver, CD (Ret)
said

As a recreational smoker, that's right, recreational (less than 25 cigs per week) I am sick and tired of all these smoking issues.As long as you can purchase cigarettes and the government taxes them and I pay the tax then they are legal! And how dare anyone tell me I cannot smoke in my home or my car or anywhere else for that matter. If you people are serious about the problem then quit beating around the bush and go for a total ban on tobbacco. Then maybe we can move onto things like the homeless or feeding the thousands of kids who go to school every day hungry. If you non-smokers had your way all smokers would be banished to Sable Island. Come to think of it that might not be so bad. NO NON SMOKERS ALLOWED ON THIS ISLAND!! I kinda like the ring of that.


3rd hand smoker champ
said

I smoke and have lot's of "3rd hand" smoke lingering all over mean especially on rainy days.

I figure if "3rd hand" smoke is damaging your fragile body that much, something else will probably kill you anyway. On second thought, something is gonna kill all of us sooner or later whether you opt to smoke or go to the gym every day. I often picture the people out for a jog as people who are trying to run away from their mortality.


Mel
said

Dear "Smoking parents are abusive..." in regards to your comment that smokers should pay higher premiums.... they already do! The amount of tax collected on each package of cigarettes far outweighs the actual cost and goes directly into healthcare coffers.
I wonder... if everyone quit smoking this instant and never bought another pack... what would the state of our already strained healthcare system be?


Jak
said

I admit I'm a smoker. A smoker who smokes outside at all times. Yes my clothes smell, and they seem to smell worse on cold days. No one smokes in my car and all house guests need to leave my house to spark up as well. I agree that stale smoke stinks up everything, but I do not believe 3rd hand smoke is as detrimental as the artical states.I think this survey is crap.
All the bible thumping anti smokers that I run into these days, strangely enough are actually ex smokers. Now that they have had success with kicking the habit, they seem to be on a rampage to make others do as they have done. Ironically enough though some of these same people have been known to *sneak* the occasional drag.
What makes me wonder is are these researchers by any chance the same ones who used to tell us that smoking was safe and enjoyable. Are the physicians the same ones who were once paid to endorse cigarette campaigns, perhaps the nurses are the same ones who used to allow parents to spark a cigar in delivery rooms. So while everyone bashes the smokers lets all remeber that the MEDICAL PROFESSIONS used to encourage and allow public smoking to occur, simply because smoking was deemed SAFE through research and development.
Now R & D says they changed their mind... opps turns out smoking is actually dangerous.
Now researchers complain that smokers are a drain on the health care system, yet I've met plenty of people who have never smoked a cigarette in their life,and they are always sick. We don't charge drunk drivers for their rehab expenses after they paralized themselves, so why would we charge smokers for this?






Hate being around stinky smoke suckers
said

There is no excuse for smoking. For decades we have known the effects of smoking on the populace.

Smoke suckers are harming our society with their disgusting foulo habit. 48% of tobacco products sold in Ontario are illegal so we know that they are also contributing to the illegal traffic in contraband tobacco.

JUST QUIT...




Ryan
said

if we can ban smoking in cars with childre, then we should ban smoking in homes with children. I think the health of children is more important than the "right to smoke" in your house.

Parents who smoke in their homes and cars and have children are basically "abusing" their children and should be held accountable.



M Wunder , Ontario
said

Third hand smoke is pushing it too far. Nobody says anything about if someone has bad body odour, and many people do. This is getting over the top. What country are we in! now? Soon you will be telling us that we all need to have the same clothes and hair cuts.
Try worrying about the job loss, and the very poor instead of a smell. It may be uncomfortable but nobody dies from it!!!
Get a grip. We (as a smoker) had to stop smoking in puplic places now. WE DID! WE DIDN"T HAVE A SAY IN IT EITHER!
WE WERE TOLD!!!
What next? Maybe George Orwell was right.


Tom in Calgary
said

I agree enough is enough and the anti-smoking lobby won but just can't can't seem to get over themselves. Now go get real jobs please. We don't need anymore publicly paid for studies.

I don't smoke. I hope someone here can produce a link or line that shows me the "studies" "proving" second hand smoke has been written up as cuase of death on any death certificate. I suspect the studies of 2nd hand smoke are about as valid as the UNs IPCC climate change report.

Please find one so I can stand corrected. Even the famed waitress from Edmonton, who sadly died of lung cancer, can't be proven to have had her cancer initiated by second hand smoke. Its anecdotal. Sad but anecdotal.

Anti-smokers have rightfully won the high ground. Now get back to work.


Kevin
said

I believe the fourth fifth and sixth hand smoke will involve billions in compensation to the victims of government's lobby group purchased interference with peaceful communities.

Followers parroting ad agency spin, are being painted as leaders, in the protectionist image of Lyndon Johnson, selling the cholesterol risk in eggs with no hint of science, is repeated by Governments signing a tobacco control treaty at the UN prior to the invention of second hand smoke.

Involving themselves in coercive and bigoted initiatives which encourage selective taxation which benefits the majority, while undermining the universality of healthcare in it's promotions.


Emotional blackmail "to protect the children" was Hitlers favorite campaign entitlement and is China's claim in their protection of Tibet.

Boston Legal could do an entire season revealing the hypocrisies of taxing an addiction, through distribution of junk science. The defense of Denny Crane's smoking his prized Cuban cigars on his corporate balcony, could have them rolling in the aisles and see acting awards for every member of the cast.

Hasn't this promotion of bigotry been around a little too long?

When a government provides a website targeting children and they call it stupid.ca, we are already well beyond the claim "children are being protected", rather than being taught the power of hatred.


Free at last
said

I'm very happy that smoking has become socially unacceptable. Study's like this reinforce the reasons why. It's a burden on society.
When you step back and look at it, smoking in a bizarre addiction that would seem ridiculous if we first encountered it in science fiction.


EMG
said

I think that people miss an important point about smoking - it is a dirty smelly habit. How would you smokers feel if I shared dirty habits with you, for example if I picked my nose and rubbed it on your shirt? How about if I didn't shower for a week and stood right next to you while you ate at a restaurant?
One of the ways people get along together is by being courteous. That means making an effort not to offend others and by helping others when we can. Whether or not you believe in the dangers of smoking, others shouldn't have to put up with your filthy habits, just as you shouldn't have to put up with theirs. Oh and by the way saying that people are discourteous in lots of other ways doesn't make any of it right. Put that in your mouth and smoke it - far away from me.


...montreal.
said

im pretty sure americans and their stupid pointless wars kill way more people then smoking.. you guys need lives.
leave smokers alone, smokings been around way before many of these reaserchers were even born, weve come a long way with technology in hospitals and health care. maybe we should be concentrating on curing the sick instead of spending so much time trying to get people to break habbits they dont even want to break.


Anne
said

I would like to see some of this research money being directed to diabetes and obesity as a significant number of the population have one or both of these conditions. The long term health effects and costs to care for them are enormous and all Canadians are sharing in this cost through higher prices for drugs and services. Let's extrapolate these numbers and put the money to better use.


Kevin M
said

The pure hatred oozing from some of the comments in this thread, demonstrate the damages done to communities as a direct result of second hand smoke promotion.

Now the bigots want to take their gains to a whole new dimension, intruding into others private homes and the relationships they have with their own children?

It is time the media groups selling this trash got back to the basics of their responsibilities, of taking out the trash.

Time they started considering the source and following the money.

This story was well advertised in the anti smoker circles and is over represented by their cult of droids and profiteers.

No one is buying it, outside of the "enlightened" [or entitled] few.

Hatred and fear mongering, are not a legal or morally acceptable forms of advertising it is time someone was convicted or sued.


Ontario Marion
said

I am a non smoker and I agree that smokers have the right to pollute their own lungs but does the second hand smoke have to filter into my apartment for me to smell all night long??
NO THANK YOU!!


TrutH
said

you smokers wanna kill yourselves, go ahead. IN YOUR OWN HOME. why should i have to smell or put up with this.

To whiners that think its hard to quit. i just smoked for 19 yrs and told my brain enough is enough. GET SOME MIND CONTROL and quit. it really isn't that hard.

you think we have it bad, your pets have way more sensible sniffers. Imagine the damage its doing to them.



MLC
said

I suffer with numerous allergies and multiple chemical sensitivities. The smell of smoke on someone's clothes or on furniture makes me very sick. Third-hand smoke gives me a headache, sore throat and stuffy nose. Therefore, I know it to be a real and serious health issue.

For those of you who are NOT affected in that manner, be glad of it. But please don't make light of a problem that, for some of us, is very serious. I realize that it's hard for smokers to stop and they have my sympathy. However, there is no way to justify their making those around them sick. A little consideration on their part rather than mockery re: how their smoke affects those around them would be appreciated. If you could only walk a mile in my shoes . . . .


George in Ontario
said

Hasn't anyone wondered why and how it is that scientists can name and document thousands of harmful substances in cigarette smoke, but can only list a handful of harmful substances associated with car exhaust emissions?


Get a Metabolism
said

Right on, '3rd hand smoker champ'!

Smoking and drinking killed my wife's father. He was 87.





george
said

Ok, I'm a non-smoker. Has anybody ever thought of all the other poisons in the air. Cigarettes are a good excuse although what about the car that drives or idles by you.
Perfumes that people wear. Now that really stinks. ( being allergic). Out gasing of carpets, cleaning products; outgasing of new homes (plywoods, glues, insulation, paints),cars, clothes. As you said (third hand smoke victim)cigarettes stinks but we all stink. More studies should be done on these other items. You may find that they maybe more lethal than third hand or even second hand smoke. The studies are too narrow minded. The more negative findings the more money that is poured into it's research leaving less for other enviromental toxins. Don't become so narrow minded. It all counts. More than you think.


Johnnie Oil
said

more garbage science, I do smell more taxes on smokers coming soon yet the govermnet will pay for stop smoking aids-too much tax dollars at risk and increased demand on healthcare as reformed smokers will live longer cost us all more. Bad social engineering


T in BC
said

Why don't they just get it over with and make smoking illegal.

Oh right, because they make a lot of money in taxes on every package sold.


jesshahabtown
said

All smokers are suicidal.
Just killing themselves slowly.

...

Children are more important than getting a nicotine high..

So is our environment..


PB in QC
said

Actually Montreal, if you checked your facts, smoking kills more people prematurely in the world than wars by a massive margin.

I'm an ex-smoker, and know to well that all this outrage is just making excuses for weak, selfish behaviour. Wake up and look in the mirror. I did.


John Amos
said

It would be more of a help if people realized that the smoke of "Pot" is just as harmful to the health as the smoke of the tobacco plant or the smoke produced by a farmer burning straw in his fields.


Angus
said

Why stop with the lingering effect of 2nd hand smoke. Perfume, air fresheners and cleaning solvents are also bad. Some people have to wear too much perfume. Twice recently at a restaurant I had to move because the woman who sat down at the next table hd just taken her bath in perfume. It almost made me throw up.


Mannie N.S.
said

When I decided the I wanted to quit smoking we repainted every room in te house, ot id of the furniture and replaced it and all the curtains as well, that was eight years ago and every cent spent was worth it.


Product of Baby Boomer
said

As a six year old I remember driving in the car with a smoking parent and wondering (as a six year old once again) how can anyone put their kid through that. Stupid is as stupid does.

The people of the fifties, sixties and seventies must have been really stupid right? These are the ones that hotboxed you in the car with harmful toxins and yes the ones that used their arm to shield you from flying through the window of the car in an accident. Did I forget to mention that these are the ones who thought fake milk from a can was a great subsitute for the breast? Baby Boomers - THE DEVISE OF THE CURRENT STATE OF THE WORLD. With their religious BS, Self Entitlement etc, etc and now it has rubbed off on GEN X'ers and the next in line. Wake up. Grab a brain. Quit your whining.


Sandi in BC
said

First and foremost - we need to consider who is purporting this issue, yes, our very own government! It promotes cigarette smoking and the consumption of alcohol by selling it. But if we ban both then we would have the same situation as illegal drugs! As a former addicted smoker I now find myself with an actual allergy to smoke - 1st, 2nd or whatever other definition they come up with. And for anyone to say it is not an addiction - they are burying their head in the sand!


KC at Saskatoon
said

I personally am quite allergic to cigarette smoke - second or third hand, as is my dog. It can take me days to recover from just one exposure. One thing I'd like the researchers to answer - is there a definitive link between the surge in nerological disorders such as autism, depression, manic depression, etc. in my generation (I'm 45) and the huge rise in smoking among my generations parents during the 30's to the 50's? It wouldn't take much to do an analysis of data that is likely already available. Considering cigarette smoke causes neurological damage, considering the huge rise in these types of neurological conditions (check with the children of smokers) since the 50's, I think my hypothesis likely has a good fit.


Charlie Brown
said

Good Grief!

It's time for a reality check. Only a couple of generations ago we cooked and heated our homes with coal, wood, buffalo chips or anything else that would burn. Mankind not only survived, it flourished!

Now our homes are filled with toxins given off by plastics, particle board, synthetic fibers, electronics, etc, etc. No one seems to mind because the resulting "new home smell" is a reminder of how successful we are.

So back to reality... first hand smoke has risks, second hand smoke probably does too, but third hand smoke... Good Grief!


Dan from Northern Ont.
said

Another solution. Make it legal to spray down smokers with air freshener :P.


kate
said

It astonishes me how much time and money is spent on garbage like this when the air we breathe is killing more people than second hand smoke has. Look up the numbers and you will see that bad air quality has killed more Canadians in the past 5 years than second hand smoke - and I'm not advocating smoking here. But I wonder if this incessant campaign of stupidity is to deter people from questioning the garbage and toxins that are being spewed into the air so that big business, government and the oil companies don't have to address that issue.


Lynda
said

I'm glad to see that people are waking up to the tyranny by paper cuts.

First the Anti smokers wanted smoke free planes, that was all. Then they wanted to just go "out" in a smoke free environment. Then it was everyone, in the public (can't let people put up signs)that needed protection; cause one wisp of a cigarette is "bad".

Now using a survey they can say "The study found no independent association between the belief that second-hand smoke harms the health of children and rules prohibiting smoking in the home and car." Yet according to "objective reporting", and "science"; its dangerous.

I'm drawing my line in the sand & saying you won't be able to take away any more private property rights using a wisp of smoke, and the lack of toxicology (science)!


Vatsal Shah
said

The most important is our elders who smoke front of child. The grow up and watch the family people smoke and they think thats good things to do it, thats why they also get addicted into it. My sugession is to tell the elders people not to smoke front of kids, and anywhere in public..otherwise we will never stop our kids to stay away from smoking...


KD
said

What's next? Are these micro-managers going to target cars next? Don't you think we have bigger issues than this? Third-hand smoke? Good grief, you inhale more toxins just stepping out your door, you consume them in your food. This is moving from informative to abusive if you ask me.


Michael
said

I can immediately tell when a heavy smoker enters a small to medium-size room; even when the person did not smoke before entering.

The stench from his/her smoking habit simply covers the person and peels off them as they enter the space near me. The horrible stench is enough to make me feel ill to varying degrees. Usually I get a sore throat and a headache just by being near this person.

When I am able to do so I just move away to avoid these people. It's very sad because I don't have a personal issue with those people. It's just that the stench from their smoking habit is so foul it affects my health to be near them. The ill effects can last hours or the rest of the day. Who wants their day ruined by having to breathe in these poisons?


KD
said

Ban cars. Ban saturated fats. Ban Fast Food Outlets that are not serving organic, raw foods. Ban deoderant, air fresheners, perfumes, detergents, paper products, animal by-products such as leather........in fact, why not just remove each individual's right to make their own choices? Alcohol will be targetted as soon as the Politians stop drinking. What is this? A movement toward a generic society?


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz