Politics -
News Sections
Duffy initially planned to reject Senate offer
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(69)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Dec. 23 2008 8:33 AM ET
When news broke that Mike Duffy could be on Prime Minister Stephen Harper's list of possible Senate appointees, Duffy was sure he would turn down the job if it was offered.
The former CTV journalist and host of Mike Duffy Live said he had heard nothing from the Prime Minister's Office, and he was convinced the reports were mistaken and he wasn't being considered for a post.
A week later, on Saturday morning, the phone rang.
"I pick up the phone, it's the prime minister," Duffy told CTV's Canada AM. "He said what do you think about reforming the Senate? I said you've got to either kill it or cure it because it's not really functioning the way it is now. And he said well, would you be interested in being appointed?"
Duffy said he hemmed and hawed for a minute or two before he was talked into leaving journalism behind and accepting the $130,400-per-year position in the Red Chamber.
"I said 'I'm not much of a partisan.' He said 'We've got lots of partisans, we don't need any more partisans, what we need is people who believe in Senate reform. You believe in Senate reform and therefore that's what I'm looking for' and I said 'ok.'"
A front-page recently ran in a newspaper with a picture of Duffy as a possible contender. When that happened, Duffy said his wife Heather asked whether he would accept the job, if it was offered.
He said his initial response was 'no,' but the more he thought about it the more he opened up to the possibility.
In the end it was the thought of retiring from CTV in two or three years, and not having a creative outlet, that convinced him to change his mind.
He said he ran into two colleagues not long ago who had recently retired from journalism and felt frustrated with the sudden change in their lives.
"I thought 'Oh dear, I don't want to go there, I want to still be challenged,'" Duffy said. "So I thought 'What the heck. This is going to be a sure deal and there's going to be a lot to do and hopefully represent the people of P.E.I. well.'"
Another former CTV journalist, Pamela Wallin, was also appointed to the Senate. She also received a call from the prime minister, and they came to agreement on the need to reform the Senate and put partisanship aside and focus on the economy, amid the current global financial uncertainty.
She said a recent trip to Afghanistan, where she witnessed Canadian troops putting their lives on the line, helped drive home the importance of personal public service.
"You then want and need to make a contribution in some way. And I think this is an important responsibility we all have, and however we choose to do it we need to make a contribution to this country," Wallin, a former diplomat and host of Canada AM, said during an interview on the show Tuesday morning.
Monday's announcement represented the largest number of senators appointed in a single day throughout Canadian history.
Harper's 18 new picks -- which in addition to the two former TV broadcasters, included an Olympic champion skier and a number of former federal and provincial politicians -- brought the total number of Conservative Senators to 38.
Long-time Senator Marjory LeBreton told CTV that she was "delighted" to see her Tory peers gain greater representation within the Senate.
"Literally, today, our numbers in the Senate virtually doubled," she said on Monday.
Fourteen of these new senators, CTV's Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife reported, were Tory organizers, former politicians and in one case, a Conservative fundraiser.
After years of successive Liberal governments, the 105-seat Senate had been made up of 58 Grits and 20 Conservatives prior to today's announcement.
Prior to Monday, Harper had appointed only two senators during his time as prime minister.
Famed skier Nancy Greene Raine, winner of 13 World Cups and the Olympic gold for giant slalom in 1968, was also named to the Senate on Monday.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(69)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Glo
0
said
0
John Chyurlia
0
said
0
John Chyurlia former CBC
Pete
0
said
0
Bluenose
0
said
0
John - Burlington
0
said
0
Derrick in Miramichi
0
said
0
Maritimer
0
said
0
Just don't be like the "Others" and forget about us little people.
PVT
0
said
0
AO
0
said
0
dave eagleson
0
said
0
YEB
0
said
0
Canada Goose Whistler
0
said
0
I'm surprised he didn't appoint a snowboarder & a comedian to makes us laugh at this joke.
Markie
0
said
0
Mike Duffy is an extremely intelligent man, with the potential of being a fantastic Senator and when I heard that Mike Duffy was being selected, I was very, very pleased.
Congratulations Mike Duffy on your appointment to the Senate. I'm sure that you will be one individual in the Senate who willnot only have the respect of your peers, but will be able to work towards Senate reform and maybe get some of them old fuddy duddies in there to actually work towards reforming that dinosaur.
Also, I am very pleased to see Mr. Harper appoint a Aboriginal Canadian as well. This should allow for some positive representation for all first nations people across this great country of ours.
Stu from London
0
said
0
George from Brampton
0
said
0
I will miss your Mike Duffy Live but this job is far more important. Yes, help shape the senate to reform and hopefully someday be elected. Keep up the good work, you will be missed on TV but your class will now show at a higher level in the Senate.
Richard L. Provencher
0
said
0
Dale - Edmonton
0
said
0
GK
0
said
0
Arlene Hilman, Red Deer Alberta
0
said
0
Mike Duffy is an improvement
0
said
0
I think he seemed insightful and he communicated well.
That should improve what we have in the senate now.
MP
0
said
0
Make us proud!
W. Mracek
0
said
0
Dan
0
said
0
Jim White
0
said
0
Chris Ont
0
said
0
JP in North Saanich,BC ( send Snow Shovels)
0
said
0
Can we TRUST Harper- Mr Flip FLop-
Promises Broken- Senate Reform, Fixed election Date, Appoint Judge to Court,
How can we trust this guy-
When will he tell the truth and be honest with the people.
Please Harper - call and election or you will go down to defeat for being a lair next month -
Is there and HONEST POLITICAN out there.
hmm- Oh Yes- I guess on was better of to lose there commons seat - to get a permanted job in the seante. Think i will start working for the Conservative party as a fund rasie- Mr Harper- i want my Seante seat in 3 yrs-
Ronald in Toronto
0
said
0
Excellent moves on the PM's part. I am particularly impressed by the proviso that if and when elections are held and the sitting senator fails to win the seat - they're gone.
Fred
0
said
0
david
0
said
0
Andre Lamoureux (Sr.) North Bay, On.
0
said
0
Timothy J St. Catharines
0
said
0
Mykey, The Lakehead
0
said
0
Conservative Mike
0
said
0
Mulroney's comments at the time: "We cannot allow an appointed chamber overthrow the wishes of the duly elected Canadian House of Commons." Hmm, sounds good Mr. Mulroney - the problem is these people are appointed by the PRIME MINISTER himself!
I challenge anyone out there to state what is wrong with a reformed senate - even a "Triple E" version - Elected, with Equal representation from the provinces, and with Effective powers to accept / veto legislation.
Mr. Harper has just appointed 18 people to a $130,000 plus salary in the time of recession for what purpose? What has the Senate done to benefit Canadians in this economic turmoil, or to assist our troops in Afghanistan? Apart from "rubber-stamping" our House of Commons legislation, and sitting on some committees that no Canadian has a clue about, the Senate is nothing more than a hodge-podge of elitist burecrats wasting taxpayers money. It's time for change in the Upper House, and I can only hope Mr. Harper, Duffy, Ms. Wallin and the gang are sincere about it...
Gord
0
said
0
All this perhaps is a sly Harper tactic to partially neutralize media critics with a cushie future senate appointment dangled as a carrot if one is not too ctitical. If so, what about objectivity in reporting? And what about the proposed senate reform? I think it sends the wrong signal and certainly casts some doubt on supposedly impartial and ojective parliament hill reporting.
Shannon
0
said
0
While some speak of flip-flop... do you really believe nothing ever warrants a change in one's actions, especially when the underlying goal does not change. The ultimate goal is senate reform.
Notice, this will not cost us $100 million to line the pockets of a few Party devotees from one Province for doing NOTHING. Enough said. Ignatieff has a long way to go before the Liberals can wave their finger at anybody, Harper included.
Edwin from Toronto
0
said
0
jay sparling
0
said
0
Happy Voter
0
said
0
Good on you sir, I think you will not only be a huge party of senate reform, but also lead both sides closer together.
I'm always amazed at how well members from both political sides open up to him and he does keep them ALL honest!!.
All the Best oin your new voyage in life Mike, and don't forget the little people who support you!!!
Dick Varley
0
said
0
Jillian Vancouver
0
said
0
No equal Senate, that's for sure!
0
said
0
We could use this money somewhere else like stimulation the economy instead of wasting it on ex politicain that show off a couple days a month.
We certainly don't want anything to do with a Senate that would be equaly share by every province. A province like PEI should not have the same political power as Ontario or Alberta or BC or Quebec.
Larger provinces will never go for that, why should they?
That makes no sense!
Alanna, Saskatchewan
0
said
0
Niagara George
0
said
0
On the one hand, the Cons talk about smaller government, but then they want to elect Senators. Think about the 100's of millions that election will cost us every 4 or 5 years. Think about the poor turnout for our elections for parliament. We'll be lucky if 25% vote for the Senate.
The Senate was supposed to be the House of Second Thought. Unfortunately, it has turned into another party controlled fiasco.
Elections will only magnify that a hundred times.
Let's go back to the original idea of selecting worthy Canadians and forget party politics.
Krista in small town Ontario
0
said
0
Timothy J St. Catharines
0
said
0
Emil
0
said
0
Bryan-Edward Taylor
0
said
0
Also, contrats to Pamela Wallin. She'll be great for the province of Saskatchewan.
AH in Calgary
0
said
0
Mike the rest who believe in reforming the seante are not true believers or else shouldn't accept the job by appointment.
Harper lost the confidence of the MPs so he want's to score some points by appointing 18 conservatives to the senate the largest ever in one appointment not only that but he also broke one of his election promises.
The PM is good in breaking promises, this is not the first time and will not be the last.
Karen George - Brantford
0
said
0
Chris Hodgson in Ontariariari-Oh!
0
said
0
paul
0
said
0
kc
0
said
0
Admittedly this is not what I expected.
I honestly thought we'd see more extremely right wing Conservative, rabidly partisan Harper supporters (like Tom Flanagan, Ted Byfield, Link Byfield or Mike Rutherford) to name a few.
It is likely these people would have raised eyebrows outside of Alberta so that may have forced him to moderate his choices somewhat.
I still think Senate reform should be a priority and I feel that the reform should implement some method of proportional representation in the upper house.
Keep the concept of a number of Senate seats per province but distribute them based on the percentage of nation wide popular vote that the parties received in the most current election.
As can be demonstrated by the percentages of popular vote, no one party would EVER dominate and all parties would be represented.
The party leaders would make the appointments for the number of seats they were entitled to and the composition of the House would change with each election.
For everyone who will jump on this and call me a fool, I admit I don't have all the bugs worked out but can't help think this would lead to a truly balanced chamber that better represents not the government of the day but every Canadian.
Leigh,Alberta
0
said
0
Maybe now Canadians can expect some progress on Senate reform.
We are feed up with the Ontario and Quebec Liberals stalling what Canadians want.
Martin
0
said
0
I will carry on with my complaint against Mike Duffy Live to the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council nonetheless. Nothing personal, but the Code of Ethics must be enforced.
HoFF
0
said
0
Joe
0
said
0
Forte59
0
said
0
Gjay
0
said
0
Edward
0
said
0
Doug BC
0
said
0
I dopn't think Mr.Harper can pull of the entire reform by himself.But at least he can get the issue on the front page,where it wil be seriously debated and discussed.Actual reform should be the product of all parties,and done for the good of the nation.NOT for partisan party reasons.
The Senate SHOULD be filled with clear thinking and non partisan people who have a touch of political savy in their bones.By doing that,we actually get "sober second thought",as opposed to the party games that go on there now.A proper Senate could also protect Canadians from Parliament,and their wacky games.A majority in Parliament would have to be sure their legislation passed the "smell test" if it has to get the support of a less partisan Senate.In the case of a minority in Parliament,the government and the opposition will know their legislation will be seriously scrutinized when it gets to the Senate.
No one believes this will be an easy task.BUT WE CAN DO THIS PEOPLE.We can have a democratic Senate that can honestly represent ALL regions of Canada equally,in an effective manner.
Open your minds.Use your imaginations.Listen to what people who oppose your position are suggesting.Be ready to compromise and look at ALL the options.Get a hold on this issue like a dog with a bone,and DEMAND an end to the status quo.
Maybe,just maybe,the headline one day will read "DEMOCRACY COMES TO CANADA"
Concerned Canadian
0
said
0
Sharon B. Saskatoon, SK
0
said
0
Linda in Vancouver
0
said
0
That said,EVERY ONE of the posts I read that indicated an opposition to Senate reform gave excuses and reasons that are simply full of holes.
Cost.The current Senate costs a bundle every year to simply rubber stamp Liberal policies.The election of Senators can be done very inexpensively by tying them in with provincial votes.And the results we get would make those costs a bargain.
Harper appointed people with some ties to the Conservative party,or only those who favour reform.Is that a shock?? Really?? When I look at the current Liberals in the Senate,I am forced to conclude that Liberals ony appointed more Liberals.To have a proper debate,BOTH sides of an issue have to be heard.Even if Harper's appointments are partisan,conservative views are still hard to hear above the roar of Liberal voices.I think we should welcome a more open debate on ALL legislation passed by a very partisan party.Of either stripe.All left,or all right is not an honest debate.
We MUST get the choices of Senators out of the PMO.No Senator that is beholden to the PMO can honestly represent the regions they are supposed to represent.
In BC,we want our Senators to speak for BC. NOT for the socialists in Ontario or Quebec. If we cannot be heard by people of our own choosing within Canada,the day will surely come when we are heard from outside of Canada.Not soon.But it will come.
Eric From Alberta
0
said
0
HKBCCAN
0
said
0
Many still don't understand, senate reform required constitution amendment. Please explain how appointing more senators can "cure" that problem?
White North
0
said
0
Integrity does not really count as long as I am going to be secure for a long time, it was a great appreciation gesture from our Prime Minister after all the help he got from the Dion speech affair.
Congratulations I hope it gets approve by the GG but we all know that this one is on the Bag.
Concerned Canadian
0
said
0
Nick Jacquet
0
said
0
Regardless, as a tax payer, don't just look at their salary. Their pension + benefits are what kills me. Do you really believe that the current senate would stop something that was good for Canada?
Finally, Kool-aid time wake-up. Readers and followers of the media please realize that the Conservatives, Liberals and NDP all know we can only take so many stories. So they give us a couple so we can forget the other ones. We can forget how Harper said we were in fine economic shape, forget the Cadman or Mulroney affair and so on. The Liberals want us to forget really quickly Mr Dion and the NDP want to stay in picture, because I have a feeling if the country is divided and we have to make a choice. The country will vote Liberal. Good or bad, right or wrong. Canadians are caring, left-centred and don't make every decision on money & Power.
Sleep well, stay focused and keep your eye on the donut not on the hole!
Lorne from Brampton
0
said
0