CTV News | Duffy initially planned to reject Senate offer

Politics -   

Duffy initially planned to reject Senate offer

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Mike Duffy reacts to his appointment
Canada AM: Patrick Brazeau, appointed to Senate, shares his reaction
Canada AM: Pamela Wallin, Senate appointee, on when she got the call
CTV National News: Robert Fife with details on the appointments out of Ottawa

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(69)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Tue. Dec. 23 2008 8:33 AM ET

When news broke that Mike Duffy could be on Prime Minister Stephen Harper's list of possible Senate appointees, Duffy was sure he would turn down the job if it was offered.

The former CTV journalist and host of Mike Duffy Live said he had heard nothing from the Prime Minister's Office, and he was convinced the reports were mistaken and he wasn't being considered for a post.

A week later, on Saturday morning, the phone rang.

"I pick up the phone, it's the prime minister," Duffy told CTV's Canada AM. "He said what do you think about reforming the Senate? I said you've got to either kill it or cure it because it's not really functioning the way it is now. And he said well, would you be interested in being appointed?"

Duffy said he hemmed and hawed for a minute or two before he was talked into leaving journalism behind and accepting the $130,400-per-year position in the Red Chamber.

"I said 'I'm not much of a partisan.' He said 'We've got lots of partisans, we don't need any more partisans, what we need is people who believe in Senate reform. You believe in Senate reform and therefore that's what I'm looking for' and I said 'ok.'"

A front-page recently ran in a newspaper with a picture of Duffy as a possible contender. When that happened, Duffy said his wife Heather asked whether he would accept the job, if it was offered.

He said his initial response was 'no,' but the more he thought about it the more he opened up to the possibility.

In the end it was the thought of retiring from CTV in two or three years, and not having a creative outlet, that convinced him to change his mind.

He said he ran into two colleagues not long ago who had recently retired from journalism and felt frustrated with the sudden change in their lives.

"I thought 'Oh dear, I don't want to go there, I want to still be challenged,'" Duffy said. "So I thought 'What the heck. This is going to be a sure deal and there's going to be a lot to do and hopefully represent the people of P.E.I. well.'"

Another former CTV journalist, Pamela Wallin, was also appointed to the Senate. She also received a call from the prime minister, and they came to agreement on the need to reform the Senate and put partisanship aside and focus on the economy, amid the current global financial uncertainty.

She said a recent trip to Afghanistan, where she witnessed Canadian troops putting their lives on the line, helped drive home the importance of personal public service.

"You then want and need to make a contribution in some way. And I think this is an important responsibility we all have, and however we choose to do it we need to make a contribution to this country," Wallin, a former diplomat and host of Canada AM, said during an interview on the show Tuesday morning.

Monday's announcement represented the largest number of senators appointed in a single day throughout Canadian history.

Harper's 18 new picks -- which in addition to the two former TV broadcasters, included an Olympic champion skier and a number of former federal and provincial politicians -- brought the total number of Conservative Senators to 38.

Long-time Senator Marjory LeBreton told CTV that she was "delighted" to see her Tory peers gain greater representation within the Senate.

"Literally, today, our numbers in the Senate virtually doubled," she said on Monday.

Fourteen of these new senators, CTV's Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife reported, were Tory organizers, former politicians and in one case, a Conservative fundraiser.

After years of successive Liberal governments, the 105-seat Senate had been made up of 58 Grits and 20 Conservatives prior to today's announcement.

Prior to Monday, Harper had appointed only two senators during his time as prime minister.

Famed skier Nancy Greene Raine, winner of 13 World Cups and the Olympic gold for giant slalom in 1968, was also named to the Senate on Monday.

Comments are now closed for this story

Glo
said
0 0

So the PM is still interested in Senate reform. That's good to hear!


John Chyurlia
said
0 0

Congratulations MIKE!! The forecasted became true, we nicknamed you "The Senator" and Volila!!
John Chyurlia former CBC


Pete
said
0 0

My congratulations to Mike Duffy. Its not every day you get a chance to serve your country in this way. He has earned this post after many years of covering the happenings in Ottawa from the "outside", now he can have a voice hopefully while on the inside".


Bluenose
said
0 0

Great job by Harper and his team on these appointees. Congratulations to all of those appointed! Harper is Leadership that Canada needs for sure. Hopefully something can finally be done with Senate reform.


John - Burlington
said
0 0

My hearty congratulations to Mike Duffy - I have followed him as a journalist for years, having first been exposed to him on the Federal Election campaign in early 1980. He is a real credit to all Canadians and I know he will be dearly missed on "Mike Duffy - Live" - I will always remember the saying "if Mike hasn't heard about it, nobody has". Mike will be a real credit to the Senate and is a very worthy appointment.


Derrick in Miramichi
said
0 0

I'm a fan of Senate reform and a huge fan of Mike Duffy...so this is a perfect match for me! GO GET 'EM DUFFY! :)


Maritimer
said
0 0

Congrats Mike!!
Just don't be like the "Others" and forget about us little people.


PVT
said
0 0

I am very glad to hear that the idea of senate reform is alive and well and that there is a plan to pursue it to fruition. The "red chamber" has long been an afront to democracy and reform needs to happen.


AO
said
0 0

If we have more "people" instead of "politicians" running the government, we would be in a better place today.Now, I wonder who can replace Mike on his show ?!


dave eagleson
said
0 0

congratulations mike,you make a great senator,your going to missed at mike duffy live but i know ctv will replace you with someone just as great and honest.i just know you do the best for all canadians


YEB
said
0 0

Although I am a Conservative supporter I want to congratulations to Mike Duffy, Pamela Wallin and Nancy Green; however, can't say the same for the others as I wanted to see outstanding Canadians that made a National contributions. For one Gen Rick Hillier, MGen Lewis MacKenzie and potentially others like them but in various fields would have been great opportunities to represent Canadian core values and hard work. An elected Senate is the way to proceed.


Canada Goose Whistler
said
0 0

I guess Harper needs the skier that has the experience in going down hill fast that seems to be where he's taking the economy. He needs the broadcasters to keep us informed on how fast he's taking the economy down hill.
I'm surprised he didn't appoint a snowboarder & a comedian to makes us laugh at this joke.


Markie
said
0 0

I think the PM made some very excellent choices for the Senate.

Mike Duffy is an extremely intelligent man, with the potential of being a fantastic Senator and when I heard that Mike Duffy was being selected, I was very, very pleased.

Congratulations Mike Duffy on your appointment to the Senate. I'm sure that you will be one individual in the Senate who willnot only have the respect of your peers, but will be able to work towards Senate reform and maybe get some of them old fuddy duddies in there to actually work towards reforming that dinosaur.

Also, I am very pleased to see Mr. Harper appoint a Aboriginal Canadian as well. This should allow for some positive representation for all first nations people across this great country of ours.


Stu from London
said
0 0

Too many celebreties without qualifications. One of Harper's many poor choices.


George from Brampton
said
0 0

Mike, congrats and thinking how you can improve Canada.
I will miss your Mike Duffy Live but this job is far more important. Yes, help shape the senate to reform and hopefully someday be elected. Keep up the good work, you will be missed on TV but your class will now show at a higher level in the Senate.


Richard L. Provencher
said
0 0

Mr. Harper is making the right decision to occupy these former vacancies. And the new people came on board with a vision of Senate reform in mind. A good move for the government. Also the target of 8 year appointments are okay, rather than an elected senate, which would need the co-operation of the provinces, something hard to achieve considering the cost of special elections.


Dale - Edmonton
said
0 0

Congratulations Mike, this is great news! Lets transform the sleepy chamber of sober second thought. The last thing we need is a constitutional battle right now; that would be required if we were to do the right thing and abolish it all together. Canadians had their eyes opened to constitutional reality when the GG had to step in and fix the mess the coalition troika caused, lets build on that and either make the senate work or get rid of it at some point.


GK
said
0 0

A Great choice. Mike will contribute a lot. Pamela also.


Arlene Hilman, Red Deer Alberta
said
0 0

Appointing the new senators another wise move, Steven, and great choices! And Mike, this is where you belong, it fits!


Mike Duffy is an improvement
said
0 0

Well, I have to honest and say that when it comes to clicking videos on the CTV website I liked to click on Mike Duffy more than all the rest.
I think he seemed insightful and he communicated well.
That should improve what we have in the senate now.


MP
said
0 0

Congrats Mike!

Make us proud!


W. Mracek
said
0 0

I'm curious to know how the senate will be reformed on the inside by moving from 58/20 to 58/40. The PM missed a chance to take the high road and appoint some people of the other political spectrum who might also be interested in reform. Had he done so he would at least have avoided the perception of patronage. The result of his appointments is that to the average citizen, like me this appears to be childish "tit for tat" behaviour on the PM's part. But he's a politician isn't he? So why would we expect him to be any different than the others?


Dan
said
0 0

Bravo "Duff!" You have earned this on behalf of all Canadians. Serve us well.


Jim White
said
0 0

I have always liked Mike and watch him alot but this seems like a sell-out to me. Harpers view must have been to just shut him up


Chris Ont
said
0 0

A great choice for reforming the senste. Duffy probably has more knowledge on how things work and what needs to be done to get results. Besides he surely knows the skeletons in the closet. Those that say he broke a promise again, these things need to be done to protect the integrity of overall goverment. I seem to remember Turner filling in vacancies when he was a short term PM. Chretian had it down to an art, and did the opposite of what they campaigned on most times. This is the start, it is just a different path to get to the finish. People that say harper had no right, look at what your favorite parties have done in the past. The pot is black


JP in North Saanich,BC ( send Snow Shovels)
said
0 0

SHAME on you Mike Duffy, Pamula Wallin and the rest of you
Can we TRUST Harper- Mr Flip FLop-
Promises Broken- Senate Reform, Fixed election Date, Appoint Judge to Court,
How can we trust this guy-
When will he tell the truth and be honest with the people.
Please Harper - call and election or you will go down to defeat for being a lair next month -
Is there and HONEST POLITICAN out there.
hmm- Oh Yes- I guess on was better of to lose there commons seat - to get a permanted job in the seante. Think i will start working for the Conservative party as a fund rasie- Mr Harper- i want my Seante seat in 3 yrs-


Ronald in Toronto
said
0 0

Stephen Harper's list of qualifications to be a Senator: Ability to thnk independently... regularly.

Excellent moves on the PM's part. I am particularly impressed by the proviso that if and when elections are held and the sitting senator fails to win the seat - they're gone.


Fred
said
0 0

Shameless hypocrisy. Stephen Harper makes more appointments to the Senate in one day than any Prime Minister in Canadian history. The same politician who vowed he would never appoint one. Even worse? Mike Duffy accepting one of those plush, unaccountable appointments under the flimsy guise of a commitment to Senate reform. To witness a veteran Press Gallery journalist, who has criticized the Senate for decades, turn around and accept an appointment to the Red Chamber is more than disappointing. It's nauseating. What a tragic way to conclude a distinguished journalism career.


david
said
0 0

18 times say 25 years times 140000, looks like $63000000 of our tax dollars wasted on already well to do people, while others struggle. This is obscene.


Andre Lamoureux (Sr.) North Bay, On.
said
0 0

Talk about calling the kettle black.Mr. Harper you have shown your true colours.Maybe you should pratice what you preach.Shame on you.


Timothy J St. Catharines
said
0 0

If Mike and Pamela remain the people they are and don't morph into typical politicians they'll be a much needed addition to the senate.


Mykey, The Lakehead
said
0 0

Mike Duffy is one of the best informed people out there. Duffy knows politics, as well as the people and institutions that enable it to function. A superb choice.


Conservative Mike
said
0 0

The Canadian Senate is a joke. It can be manipulated by the Prime Minister to fit his needs - case in point - Brian Mulroney stacking it in 1990 with eight Conservative senators in order to get the GST bill passed, a bill which the then Liberal controlled senate threatened to squash.

Mulroney's comments at the time: "We cannot allow an appointed chamber overthrow the wishes of the duly elected Canadian House of Commons." Hmm, sounds good Mr. Mulroney - the problem is these people are appointed by the PRIME MINISTER himself!

I challenge anyone out there to state what is wrong with a reformed senate - even a "Triple E" version - Elected, with Equal representation from the provinces, and with Effective powers to accept / veto legislation.

Mr. Harper has just appointed 18 people to a $130,000 plus salary in the time of recession for what purpose? What has the Senate done to benefit Canadians in this economic turmoil, or to assist our troops in Afghanistan? Apart from "rubber-stamping" our House of Commons legislation, and sitting on some committees that no Canadian has a clue about, the Senate is nothing more than a hodge-podge of elitist burecrats wasting taxpayers money. It's time for change in the Upper House, and I can only hope Mr. Harper, Duffy, Ms. Wallin and the gang are sincere about it...


Gord
said
0 0

It does not pass the sniff test with me and the optics of it all looks more like a payoff. Moreover, the hemming and hawing by Mike and cajoling by the PM is a total crock.
All this perhaps is a sly Harper tactic to partially neutralize media critics with a cushie future senate appointment dangled as a carrot if one is not too ctitical. If so, what about objectivity in reporting? And what about the proposed senate reform? I think it sends the wrong signal and certainly casts some doubt on supposedly impartial and ojective parliament hill reporting.


Shannon
said
0 0

For those who spout negative hyperbole, understand the situation. A Senate stacked with Liberal hacks. Now, there's fresh air, not flatus.

While some speak of flip-flop... do you really believe nothing ever warrants a change in one's actions, especially when the underlying goal does not change. The ultimate goal is senate reform.

Notice, this will not cost us $100 million to line the pockets of a few Party devotees from one Province for doing NOTHING. Enough said. Ignatieff has a long way to go before the Liberals can wave their finger at anybody, Harper included.


Edwin from Toronto
said
0 0

For existing senates who oppose the appoinement, you should support a reform to have every members being elected.



jay sparling
said
0 0

I like most of the recent coices for senate. However I don't agree with an elected senate, it will make the upper chamber more political and partisan then ever. The last thing Ottawa needs is more politians. I'm afraid that with an elected senate we wouldn"t see people like Duffy there. In addition term caps may allow individual parties to dominate. Most voters in this country are not right of centre, an elaected senate may leave the conservitives out in the cold. This would not be good for the country.


Happy Voter
said
0 0

I'm a liberal Supporter, and Find myself in total amazment that Mike Duffy is heading to the Senate!!

Good on you sir, I think you will not only be a huge party of senate reform, but also lead both sides closer together.
I'm always amazed at how well members from both political sides open up to him and he does keep them ALL honest!!.

All the Best oin your new voyage in life Mike, and don't forget the little people who support you!!!


Dick Varley
said
0 0

The comments here emphasize congratulations to Mike and well they should as he is well respected throughout the country. However let us not forget the purpose of Prime Minister Harper's appointments. That is to achieve Senate reform. If public opinion for reform is as strong as the polls suggest then Harper is responding appropriately. Although definitely not the only issue in an election campaign this one will have great importance. Mike, with his behind the scenes knowledge, hopefully will become a major catalyst in achieving this objective.


Jillian Vancouver
said
0 0

Congratulations Nancy Greene Raine, having real people instead of politicians in Ottawa is long overdue.


No equal Senate, that's for sure!
said
0 0

There is no need to reform but the Senate should be abolished.

We could use this money somewhere else like stimulation the economy instead of wasting it on ex politicain that show off a couple days a month.

We certainly don't want anything to do with a Senate that would be equaly share by every province. A province like PEI should not have the same political power as Ontario or Alberta or BC or Quebec.

Larger provinces will never go for that, why should they?
That makes no sense!


Alanna, Saskatchewan
said
0 0

Excellant choices! Congratulations to the new appointees and kudos to Mr. Harper for choosing people who already have the respect of Canadians.


Niagara George
said
0 0

REFORM brings to mind some minor adjustments to make it function better. Harper is talking about whole scale changes.

On the one hand, the Cons talk about smaller government, but then they want to elect Senators. Think about the 100's of millions that election will cost us every 4 or 5 years. Think about the poor turnout for our elections for parliament. We'll be lucky if 25% vote for the Senate.

The Senate was supposed to be the House of Second Thought. Unfortunately, it has turned into another party controlled fiasco.

Elections will only magnify that a hundred times.

Let's go back to the original idea of selecting worthy Canadians and forget party politics.


Krista in small town Ontario
said
0 0

I heard on the news last night that the Senate works an average of 73 days a year...and they get paid very well! How do I get one of them jobs??? I work over 240 days a year for a fraction of what they make. Mr Harper, I'll send you my phone number!


Timothy J St. Catharines
said
0 0

Yes, Duffy is a good man for the job. I enjoy his commentary and think he's sincere and good for politics. Besides Harper having appointed 18 to senate, i can't help think there's more than meets the eye. While we're focused on this,.. what else? Harper has manipulate before. Assume he's got a hidden agenda. He couldn't have the country's bet interest in mind, could he. Time will tell.


Emil
said
0 0

Good things happen to good people.Congradulations Mike.You are truly an unselfish public servant.You deserve this.Merry Christmas.


Bryan-Edward Taylor
said
0 0

Congrats, Mike. While you're senate appointment is well deserved, it also takes away one of the few impartial reporters, and one of the few worth watching, out of the liberal media. You'll sorely be missed there. But again, congrats on being a Senator.

Also, contrats to Pamela Wallin. She'll be great for the province of Saskatchewan.


AH in Calgary
said
0 0

In order to be an influential person you have to lead by example.

Mike the rest who believe in reforming the seante are not true believers or else shouldn't accept the job by appointment.

Harper lost the confidence of the MPs so he want's to score some points by appointing 18 conservatives to the senate the largest ever in one appointment not only that but he also broke one of his election promises.

The PM is good in breaking promises, this is not the first time and will not be the last.


Karen George - Brantford
said
0 0

When I heard the news of Mike Duffy’s appointment to the Senate I was momentarily devastated. Like an addict forced into instant withdrawal, I couldn’t imagine what I would do if I couldn’t check out the political scene by watching Mike “peel off the layers of the onion” on the issues of interest to Canadians. We fans will miss you Duff, but are truly happy for you as you dig into your new job. Congratulations also to all of the new Senators. Your commitment to an elected Senate will eventually gather momentum and Canadians will get the true “second sober thought” they deserve.


Chris Hodgson in Ontariariari-Oh!
said
0 0

I am delighted to hear of "the Duff" being appointed to the senate. Mike has always been very balanced and practical in his approach to journalism, he doesnt let all the 'noise' get in the way of the truth in the story.That is something that must be very hard to do considering all the spin doctors and media folks who will mask the truth with all their rhetorical spin.I think his "down home" common sense and ability to see through the b.s. will serve us well. Congratulations Mike!


paul
said
0 0

I felt ill when I heard of the appointmens. 18 new $130,000 jobs in a time when the economy is at rock bottom. Not to mention the golden pensions they will all recieve. It's all politics at our expense. I wish one of the appointees would have had the guts to turn down the appointment for the good of the country. Mr. Harper....you just lost me......don't worry the Liberals are lost too.


kc
said
0 0

I read the list of nominees and they are interesting.

Admittedly this is not what I expected.

I honestly thought we'd see more extremely right wing Conservative, rabidly partisan Harper supporters (like Tom Flanagan, Ted Byfield, Link Byfield or Mike Rutherford) to name a few.

It is likely these people would have raised eyebrows outside of Alberta so that may have forced him to moderate his choices somewhat.

I still think Senate reform should be a priority and I feel that the reform should implement some method of proportional representation in the upper house.

Keep the concept of a number of Senate seats per province but distribute them based on the percentage of nation wide popular vote that the parties received in the most current election.

As can be demonstrated by the percentages of popular vote, no one party would EVER dominate and all parties would be represented.

The party leaders would make the appointments for the number of seats they were entitled to and the composition of the House would change with each election.

For everyone who will jump on this and call me a fool, I admit I don't have all the bugs worked out but can't help think this would lead to a truly balanced chamber that better represents not the government of the day but every Canadian.


Leigh,Alberta
said
0 0

Very good choice.
Maybe now Canadians can expect some progress on Senate reform.
We are feed up with the Ontario and Quebec Liberals stalling what Canadians want.


Martin
said
0 0

I think Mike Duffy will make a fine senator, actually. He can be thoughtful and add value to the parliamentary process and will continue to do so after Mr. Harper is gone. It's the chamber of sober second thoughts, and he will have such thoughts.

I will carry on with my complaint against Mike Duffy Live to the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council nonetheless. Nothing personal, but the Code of Ethics must be enforced.


HoFF
said
0 0

Mike Duffy should no accept this offer as it is from Harper. I beilve such acceptance will destort his image


Joe
said
0 0

The Prime Minister has no right to be appointing senators during a time when he had to seek the protection from being voted out of office. I am very surprised and disappointed that all the new senators do not see a moral conflict with their acceptance of these positions.


Forte59
said
0 0

He must have changed his mind in a nano-second.Being on easy street for the rest of your life thnks to your master Harper is really difficult to turn down,I would think.Welcome to the through Mr.Duffy.I didn't even know you were from P.E.I.Go figure!


Gjay
said
0 0

Belly up to the trough, thats all the senate is nothing more nothing less. End of story!


Edward
said
0 0

I had a lot of respect for Mike Duffy until he accepted Mr. Harpers Xmas. present. But then again I guess 130,000 a year plus perks, plus a tax free expense account is hard to turn down.


Doug BC
said
0 0

I'm ecstatic just seeing so many posts by people that recognize the value of reforming the afront to democracy,that we in Canada call a Senate.And special thanks to people east of Manitoba,whose premiers are rarely heard on the topic.
I dopn't think Mr.Harper can pull of the entire reform by himself.But at least he can get the issue on the front page,where it wil be seriously debated and discussed.Actual reform should be the product of all parties,and done for the good of the nation.NOT for partisan party reasons.
The Senate SHOULD be filled with clear thinking and non partisan people who have a touch of political savy in their bones.By doing that,we actually get "sober second thought",as opposed to the party games that go on there now.A proper Senate could also protect Canadians from Parliament,and their wacky games.A majority in Parliament would have to be sure their legislation passed the "smell test" if it has to get the support of a less partisan Senate.In the case of a minority in Parliament,the government and the opposition will know their legislation will be seriously scrutinized when it gets to the Senate.
No one believes this will be an easy task.BUT WE CAN DO THIS PEOPLE.We can have a democratic Senate that can honestly represent ALL regions of Canada equally,in an effective manner.
Open your minds.Use your imaginations.Listen to what people who oppose your position are suggesting.Be ready to compromise and look at ALL the options.Get a hold on this issue like a dog with a bone,and DEMAND an end to the status quo.
Maybe,just maybe,the headline one day will read "DEMOCRACY COMES TO CANADA"


Concerned Canadian
said
0 0

I've always liked Mike and hope that he can remain non-partisan. But you know the old saying: "Better to have your enemies inside the tent pissing out than outside pissing in." I hope Mike can remember that the idea is Senate reform, and not succumb to the $130,000 salary. Otherwise this just demonstrates how Machiavellian Harper really is (for Conservative supporters, Machiavelli was a very cynical and ruthless politician of the 16th century who set the standard for political manipulation and deceit).


Sharon B. Saskatoon, SK
said
0 0

How is this going to help our economy ! Mr. Harper brought all of this coalition and partisan politics by wanting to cancel the $1.98 for each political party. Now he wants to fill the senate, 18 seats that will cost the tax payer $2,340,000 at the low end of the pay scale. Again this is simply and blatently partisan politics from Harper. There are too many sheep and a total lack of leadership...Harper is not a leader !


Linda in Vancouver
said
0 0

I have to admit,I have a huge bias in favour of reforming the Senate,or,if that fails,abolishing it all together.I am from the west of Canada,where this issue is always on the table.And the main reason I am a "former" Liberal,is because they refuse to participate in ridding us of the stench that comes with the current for of the Senate.
That said,EVERY ONE of the posts I read that indicated an opposition to Senate reform gave excuses and reasons that are simply full of holes.
Cost.The current Senate costs a bundle every year to simply rubber stamp Liberal policies.The election of Senators can be done very inexpensively by tying them in with provincial votes.And the results we get would make those costs a bargain.
Harper appointed people with some ties to the Conservative party,or only those who favour reform.Is that a shock?? Really?? When I look at the current Liberals in the Senate,I am forced to conclude that Liberals ony appointed more Liberals.To have a proper debate,BOTH sides of an issue have to be heard.Even if Harper's appointments are partisan,conservative views are still hard to hear above the roar of Liberal voices.I think we should welcome a more open debate on ALL legislation passed by a very partisan party.Of either stripe.All left,or all right is not an honest debate.
We MUST get the choices of Senators out of the PMO.No Senator that is beholden to the PMO can honestly represent the regions they are supposed to represent.
In BC,we want our Senators to speak for BC. NOT for the socialists in Ontario or Quebec. If we cannot be heard by people of our own choosing within Canada,the day will surely come when we are heard from outside of Canada.Not soon.But it will come.



Eric From Alberta
said
0 0

As a long time Tory supporter on the air, it is good to have you officially in the nest.


HKBCCAN
said
0 0

I can not understand how accepting a position in the problem (the Senate) is the solution (senate reform) of the problem.

Many still don't understand, senate reform required constitution amendment. Please explain how appointing more senators can "cure" that problem?


White North
said
0 0

Great work Mike I would have take the job myself even when parliament is prorogue the $ 134,000 and the $90,000 expenses plus all the other incentives up to $ 1,000.000.00 until 75 is great retirement security in these trouble times.
Integrity does not really count as long as I am going to be secure for a long time, it was a great appreciation gesture from our Prime Minister after all the help he got from the Dion speech affair.
Congratulations I hope it gets approve by the GG but we all know that this one is on the Bag.



Concerned Canadian
said
0 0

Well, I can't say I am pleased, nor can I say I am displeased. I can't agree with many posts about the appointments though... these appointments aren't what I would call independent thinkers who would realistically contribute a "sobering second thought" to legislation that is put before them. They are all appointed because of their biased views and not for their accomplishments (which might hold true for most appointments). While I am sure they can all contribute, I can't say that it doesn't come at some significant expense to Harper's alerady diminished credibility. Specifically to Mike Duffy; can you say thank you for outing Mr Dion? Didn't see through that one!


Nick Jacquet
said
0 0

It is too bad we have focused on the appointees rather then on the double standard messages and does he have the right to appoint?

Regardless, as a tax payer, don't just look at their salary. Their pension + benefits are what kills me. Do you really believe that the current senate would stop something that was good for Canada?

Finally, Kool-aid time wake-up. Readers and followers of the media please realize that the Conservatives, Liberals and NDP all know we can only take so many stories. So they give us a couple so we can forget the other ones. We can forget how Harper said we were in fine economic shape, forget the Cadman or Mulroney affair and so on. The Liberals want us to forget really quickly Mr Dion and the NDP want to stay in picture, because I have a feeling if the country is divided and we have to make a choice. The country will vote Liberal. Good or bad, right or wrong. Canadians are caring, left-centred and don't make every decision on money & Power.

Sleep well, stay focused and keep your eye on the donut not on the hole!




Lorne from Brampton
said
0 0

For those opposed to the senate appointments (i.e. the Harper haters who would harp no matter what he did) please remove the partisan hat for a moment and think of it this way. The senate currently 58-20 in favour of the Liberals would have been 78-20 in favour of the Liberals after a coalition gov't comes together. unelected with 80% of the power to pass partisan bills is too scary. While I don't like the appointment of senators, there needs to be more balance, and if Harper didn't appoint them, Ignatieff/Layton/Duceppe would have.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz