News Sections
Liberals to hold leadership convention in April
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(22)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sat. Nov. 8 2008 11:09 PM ET
The Liberal Party of Canada will hold a leadership convention in Vancouver next year to determine who will take over the reins from Stephane Dion.
The party released new rules for the leadership race on Saturday, including a large entrance fee of $90,000. During the 2006 leadership campaign, the party charged hopefuls a $50,000 entrance fee.
Also, spending by the leadership candidates will be restricted to $1.5 million each, which is far smaller than 2006's $3.4 million limit.
The party's national executive met Saturday in Ottawa to prepare for the leadership convention, which will take place from Apr. 30 to May 3.
Dion announced his intention to step down as Liberal leader after the Liberals' dismal showing in the federal election, where they won 76 seats in their worst result since 1984.
Only two candidates have so far thrown their hat into the ring: Toronto MP Bob Rae and New Brunswick MP Dominic LeBlanc. Toronto MP Michael Ignatieff is also expected to run.
Other potential candidates include former Quebec cabinet ministers Denis Coderre and Martin Cauchon, as well as Ontario MPs Ruby Dhalla and David McGuinty.
Last week, former deputy prime minister John Manley announced that he would not seek the Liberal leadership.
Many Liberals want to avoid a 10-candidate race as happened during the 2006 leadership campaign, CTV's Rosemary Thompson said Saturday on CTV Newsnet.
Thompson said many Liberal Party operatives want this race to be about finding a strong leader rather than letting backbenchers position themselves for future cabinet posts.
"Many people do run in leaderships to try and position themselves to ultimately be cabinet ministers someday, or very important critics in the party," Thompson said. "But this time around there's a real sense in the party that it's not time to resume build, that it's time to get on with the show and get behind whichever leader they do end up choosing."
Yesterday, the Quebec wing of the party proposed new rules that would prohibit any potential candidate who still has debt after the 2006 leadership race from running this time around.
The rule would disqualify Gerard Kennedy and Martha Hall Findlay, who each owe about $200,000 from their unsuccessful leadership bids two years ago.
While Ignatieff has said he is debt-free, the most recent financial report he filed with Elections Canada indicates he may owe about $60,000.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(22)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
Two questions:
1) What does Mr Colvin personally have to gain by what he is exposing ?
2) What has the Goverment gain or protect by discrediting Mr Colvin?

Comments are now closed for this story
Henry Wysmulek
said
Neutral Logic
said
1. Party is millions in debt.
2. The candidates for the leadership are trying to backstab each other constanly. (who exactly said Rae wan't running?)
3. Individual debt from the last leadership is in the 100,000's.
4. The Liberal Party has gone too far to the left, and the candidates running will keep them there. Canada already has a far left party, and the LPC should see how the NDP is not what Canadians want.
5. They will have a leader in the spring, but will need another convention on policy. Where exactly is this party going? And where will the money come from to do it?
6. The cut throat politics within the LPC shows that it is not about the good of the country or even to rally behind a leader/party. It is about power.
7. The LPC wonders why they can't get an inspirational leader like Obama. Well, that's because the good ol' boys" won't let the new, fresh blood with new inspirational ideas to step up. Again...they want the power. Along with the fact, that the Liberals have only been out of power less than 3 years...the Democrats were out 8.
8. The grassroots of the Liberal Party does not have any control in the direction. Delegates vote in the leader. IT should be one member-one vote, as the NDP and Conservatives do. Look at the money they make! The LPC needs to be completely over-hauled, but it will not happen until they sink even further.
The once great Liberal Party of Canada has become a complete mess. Canada needs them to provide a viable alternative. That's what makes democracy great. Right now, the only party that has earned the right to govern, is the Conservatives with Stephen Harper at the healm.
Lisa K
said
faye in the village
said
JS
said
Rob in London
said
Buford Wilson
said
BC Boy
said
Steve the Pundit
said
Continuing the analogy, instead of taking time to go back to port and repair the damage, the "captains" of the Liberal ship are bound and determined to go back out to battle as quickly as possible and hit the iceberg again (fight another election). Without proper repair and rebuilding from the ground up, the ship (party) will not sustain another iceberg hit, and it will go down, maybe for good.
Liberals have forgotten the key to their numerous electoral victories over the last fifty years: politics is like a war, and you don't continue to fight an enemy that is stronger than you when you've sustained heavy casualities.
For those true Liberals that are undoubtedly still out there, go lick your wounds, figure out what you what to present to the public and THEN find the leader that's best able to do so.
Anything else, and it's "cue the orchestra".
Rob
said
Doug Ont
said
Ottawa Harvard
said
It was clear who was winning the sign wars - the Tories, by a long shot. For instance, in Vic Toews riding, his organizers had signs at every cross road, whether a county dirt road or a major intersection. It was the same everywhere, with the exception of Saskatchewan where the NDP did about as good a job as the Tories. Liberals - hardly visible, with the exception of sitting candidates, such as Ujjal Dusanjh.
The Liberals used to be famous for running vacuous but well organized campaigns. This time it was vacuous and disorganized.
It will take several years for a new leader to, first, restore the organizational excellence of the Liberal Party, and second, to provide a new intellectual footing.
Therefore, old warhorses such as Rae and Ignatieff should not be the new leader. Cauchon or Leblanc, or Kennedy, would be better.
Better still would be that they don't succeed.
Kevin
said
Vancouverite
said
Mike
said
Good for you - a most thoughtful analysis of the man. Or am I alone out here in the the smash 'em bash 'em crowd?
John
said
I've heard Hall-Findlay speak too many times. She doesn't even come across as cabinet material. She only gets attention because she is filling a vacuum.
The liberal party needs to welcome more female competition, but what high-quality, strong females in Canadian society would choose a yucky life in politics when they can easily shape their lives to secure more rewarding & more meaningful power via other pursuits?
Sonya
said
roy cotton
said
Chris Ont
said
Until fresh blood and idea's are found, they will be on the outside looking in.
Donald Quinn
said
Brent - BC
said
As long as the same "Green Lighter's" are in place, there will never be any young new blood in the Leadership race.
If the Liberal's ever get around to "retiring" the "old guard", they may recover within the next century.
Anne M
said