CTV News | McCain, Palin insiders declare war on one another

Top Stories -   

McCain, Palin insiders declare war on one another

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Newsnet: Darrell West, Brookings Institute

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(63)

The Canadian Press

Date: Mon. Oct. 27 2008 9:23 AM ET

WASHINGTON — Facing a deft assault by Democrats and widescale rejection by voters, John McCain and Sarah Palin are circling the wagons and firing inwards at each other with just nine days until the presidential election.

The tattered remains of their ticket were everywhere Sunday, with both McCain and Palin insiders publicly on the attack to hold the other side responsible for their candidate's woes on the campaign trail.

"She is a diva -- she takes no advice from anyone," an unnamed McCain adviser told CNN over the weekend.

"She does not have any relationships of trust with any of us, her family or anyone else ... also, she is playing for her own future and sees herself as the next leader of the party. Remember: Divas trust only unto themselves, as they see themselves as the beginning and end of all wisdom."

Those close to Palin, however, say she has simply tried to break free of a McCain campaign that terribly mishandled her, making her the butt of international jokes in the process.

"The campaign as a whole bought completely into what the Washington media said -- that she's completely inexperienced," a close Palin ally told the Politico website.

"Her strategy was to be trustworthy and a team player during the convention and thereafter, but she felt completely mismanaged and mishandled and ill-advised. Recently, she's gone from relying on McCain advisers who were assigned to her to relying on her own instincts."

Palin is apparently most miffed at McCain advisers Nicolle Wallace and Steve Schmidt.

It was their decision to limit Palin's media contact to interviews with ABC's Charlie Gibson and a series of chats with CBS's Katie Couric parcelled out over several cringe-worthy days. They proved to be disastrous for both the Alaska governor personally and McCain's campaign.

Wallace sent an emailed response to several news organizations over the weekend: "If people want to throw me under the bus, my personal belief is that the most honourable thing to do is to lie there," she wrote.

In recent weeks, Palin has publicly parted ways with the McCain campaign on various fronts, leading many to speculate she is attempting to distinguish herself from the flailing Arizona senator and forge her own identity in preparation for a run for the White House in 2012.

Among them:

  • She wondered in an interview with the New York Times why McCain had deemed off-limits Obama's association with his onetime pastor, the incendiary Rev. Jeremiah Wright;
  • She questioned the use of so-called robocalls by the campaign, calling them annoying;
  • She disagreed with the campaign's decision to pull out of the state of Michigan.

These and other departures from the campaign's positions have prompted one McCain insider to suggest Palin is "going rogue."

One political observer says it's no wonder.

"She should sue them for malpractice," said Sam Popkin, author of "The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns."

"They chose her because they needed some energy, they needed a personality, and they turned that personality into an idiot due to their hurried, ad hoc choice of her and their subsequent cluelessness on how to handle her."

The McCain campaign should have figured out who they wanted as their vice-presidential candidate weeks earlier and begun preparing that person for the spotlight long before they announced it, said Popkin, who teaches political science at the University of Southern California.

"No one could have handled that kind of international attention without any preparation whatsoever."

But others say many of Palin's unexpected shortcomings forced the McCain campaign to keep her out of the media spotlight.

"Her lack of fundamental understanding of some key issues was dramatic," another McCain source told CNN. The source said it was probably the "hardest" to get her "up to speed than any candidate in history."

Recent polls suggest Palin has been a significant drag on the Republican ticket despite being popular among the party's core supporters, with most of those surveyed saying they have no confidence she has the qualifications to be vice-president.

She's also been dogged with scandal since joining the ticket. She was found guilty of abusing her power as governor in the so-called "Troopergate" scandal over the firing of her ex-brother-in-law, and is now facing another probe over whether she violated ethics rules in the affair.

Last week, there was more controversy when it was revealed $150,000 had been spent on clothes for Palin, a self-styled down-home "hockey mom," since late August.

Please Add Comments( )

Jason
said
0 0

It seems like the Republicans are falling apart at the seams ! Perfect timing too, better now than before they had a chance to get in the White house and really mess things up for everyone in the USA and globally !! Good luck in your future endeavors, John and Sarah, ya bunch of Mavericks !!

Go Obama !!!



Elizabeth
said
0 0

DAH!!!!!!! This was predicted from the get go NO big surprises here. IT was just a matter of time .


lawguru
said
0 0

it gives me joy to see the republican party in such a mess- but this is a country that voted in Bush twice- so i cant trust the polls


GC
said
0 0

This is pure media manipulation.

There is a cult like atmosphere around Obama and the media is in the US is doing all it can to influence this election.

Journalists have become commentators; their admiration for Obama is obvious.

Find me one mainstream news item that is anti-Obama? You will be surprised at how difficult that is....




Lynn MacDonald
said
0 0

I am absolutely amazed that McCain chose Palin as his running mate. There are a number of very smart, experienced women senators and governors in the US who would have been a much better partner. Sarah Palin is an insult to women everywhere. I hope she disappears into the Alaskan wilderness after Nov. 4.


Jane
said
0 0

Sarah has been criticized from the get-go, and has rose up, in spite of it. She brings passion and life to the republian party!!

Go Sarah Go



Simon Shaw
said
0 0

I don't really understand the experience issue. It has no bearing on Barrack Obama who was nothing more than a community leader before becoming a first term senator who has lead nothing.

I fundamentally disagree with just about all of Palins stances on the most basic of issues. I do however see her as a candidate that has vastly more qualification to be president than Obama. Is it that, Obama being a man, is a qualification in of itself? Is this what I am missing? Could it be that simple?



Dick Varley
said
0 0

On CTV's Question Period Susan Eisenhower, granddaughter of Dwight D. Eisenhower demonstrated how problematic the choices made by the Republican Party have been. She is an articulate, younger woman with experience in international and financial matters. She has name recognition. She supports the small "c" conservative values of her grandfather. She deplores the performance of the Bush administration. She believes that the choice of Sara Palin as McLean's VP running mate was a mistake. For many reasons she and Colin Powell have chosen to support Obama.

With the benefit of hindsight the Republican Party has either conceded from the beginning that they would not win this election and therefor supported unelectable candidates or the leaders just missed an opportunity to put more talented persons in the running. Ms. Eisenhower certainly would have been a major asset. That opportunity is now lost.


John G. malone
said
0 0

...1. She was found guilty of nothing. The "troopergate probe" cleared her of any illegality. She was criticized by the panel.

2. Her ex-brother-in-law was never fired. He's still a trooper. ...




A. Villeneuve
said
0 0

G.C.
The media do not need to be anti someone! For once they have an individual that posesses intelligence, oersonality and organizational skills! During the primary, the media dug deep in trying to find fault with Obama and were successful at time but he has shown class and humility. Perhaps that is the difference between McCain-Palin and Obama-Biden alternative. Also Palin became the number one name on the ticket thus making herself a big target for the media and McCain's handlers. It was obvious from day one that she was the wrong choice for the job and would be a liability at one point during the campaign.
And McCain still question Obama's judgement???


Change is Good
said
0 0

Speaking of the Republicans falling apart at the seams, this seems to parallel the Liberals woes here in Canada. Yes, change is coming both here and in the US and it's about time!


True North
said
0 0

If Sarah Palin trys to get the nod for the Republican nomination for Prez in 2012 she will split the party wide open, and unless she acquires a brain in the next 4 years her odds of becoming Prez remain slim to none.


Golf Company Grunt
said
0 0

More blatant left wing misinformation (lies) to boost their poster boy. For the most part, the U.S. maintsteam media has been in the tank for Obama from the get go and CNN is certainly no exception.

'Pro Patria'


Andrew
said
0 0

Sounds like a deep seated Democrate in the Republican party, trying to promote animosity. The last thing a Liberal likes is a conservative person!

Since Sarah Palin's introduction to the Republican ticket, the liberal media and right wing extremists have been using everything in their power to discredit and destroy her. ...



Hilary for Prez in 8years
said
0 0

Well McCain you are the idiot that chose her as a running mate.


Alex Nelson
said
0 0

There just trying to blame each other for their negative campaign that backfired by attacking Obama personally!


John Trainer
said
0 0

Simon - It seems to me Obama makes up for his inexperience by surrounding himself with the best and brightest in their particular area of expertise (which is just good management frankly). He out-classes Palin in just about every area and he's flat out smarter. If you watch any interview with Palin you'll see she's stumped by basic questions. The world has suffered from 8 years of a similarly incurious, inarticulate, obstinate personality - time for a fresh start.


Edmonton John
said
0 0

Cindy McCain said god diverted the hurricane from New Orleans. Sarah says god will decide the election. Republicans are happy to take credit for anything going right but for anything that confuses them,they just leave it to god.

This is really scary, though. We can't have a person putting their finger on a little red button thinking that god will sort out the good and the bad.

Superstitious people are not rational. I don't mean to offend spiritual people, but superstitious fundamentalists of any stripe do not belong anywhere near political and military power.


JK
said
0 0

The American elaection is just as much a joke and the Canadian election.Comedy 101.
The Republicans are in such dis-array and looking really bad with no thanks to McCain.I don't believe that Ms Palin is the reason. She should have told McCain where to stick the VP job. Now we know when McCain loses the election where he'll place the blame, when he should be held responsible. Putting a good looking lady on the ticket as your running mate has backfired. She just doesn't have the experince needed to be VP.


Shannon
said
0 0

NO ONE can be prepared to be President. (Bill Clinton's words). Similarly, NO ONE has sufficient experience to be President or Vice-President. This is true of McCain, Palin, Obama, and Biden.

Palin has made the mistake of being straight-forward and not CRAFTING her responses - like Obama.

Ironically, both VP candidates tend to speak from the cuff, often saying the politically incorrect thing. It should be okay to say "I don't know." But, the American media expects PACKAGES the message to make people seem remarkably intelligent or stupid. THAT is pathetic - and many of us buy it.

Palin has shown she learns quickly, stays poised and positive, and remains extraordinarily calm under fire.

To the comment about Palin being an embarrassment... Most people under such scrutiny would just melt, cry, and stammer. The fact she does not know does NOT mean she would not or could not learn. She has proven she would and could. BUT, we'll never know because of awful preparation by McCain's people and a very liberal media.

Sadly, we (including Canadians) will suffer the consequences - clever oratory will NOT solve problems or give people long-term confidence.

Stung again by marketing and packaging while the world goes to… You got it. THAT is pathetic - not Palin.



Jeff in the Hummer
said
0 0

I think the real distinction between Ms Palin and Obama is that he has built an international reputation based on his vision for the future and his power of oratory to give people a sense of hope and direction.

As a senator, he has made many contacts in Washington, and understands how the mechanism of the federal government operates. He has impresses many people with his intelligence and understanding, voting and crafting numerous pieces of legislation.

As a former Harvard law professor, he has a deep understanding of how Constitutional law operates, and the intricacies of how it is implemented.

He has also run an extremely successful national campaign which has reached out to millions of voters, and has coordinated the efforts of thousands of people to lead in the polls.

As a leader, he will assemble a team of people who will give him the necessary support to do the work that America needs to do to reinvent itself for the 21st century.

Ms Palin was chosen on the basis of her gender as a way of influencing voters who might otherwise have voted for Hilary Clinton.

She has run a small town, a job which requires fewer administrative skills than running an average sized high school.

She has run up an impressive and growing list of scandals as governor of Alaska, including the misuse of her power to fire someone on personal grounds, and misappropriation of public funds for private use by taking her children with her on junkets paid for by the state.

And now she has managed to allow her team to come into conflict with her running mate just days before the election.

This should give you a fair sense of the difference between these people's character and accomplishments.


Ed
said
0 0

I wonder how many of you arm chair critics have ever been on television, faced a rabid reporter looking for the big news, or tried to carry on a civil discussion in that context with someone who was out to prove a point - and would cut and paste what you said or how you looked to prove what they wanted to prove in the first place.

Not all of this has happened all the time, but it has happened a lot to Palin - as it did to Clinton during the primaries. (Clinton had a history of public visibility to fall back on. Palin has not.)

It's easy to comment when you've never picked up the ball, let alone gone on the playing field.

Palin looks good to me, as does Biden. The two I don't trust are McCain and Biden. I'd prefer Sarah or Joe any day over either of the other two. Either would make the effort to get ready for Day 1. They'd have two months. The problem is, neither McCain nor Obama think they need to get ready. They’re ready to save us all now.



Corey in Manitoba
said
0 0

The republicans, much like the Liberals here in Canada, need to self implode so they can get back to what they believe in. Under Bush, the conservative platform of less govt, and lower taxes has gone out the window. They lower taxes but increase spending by trillions and increased the size of govt by 40 percent. The republicans could have had Reagan running and I don't think the results would be too different.

McCain was never that accepted by the true right and Palin helped for a while until she started to talk. The right may like her, but they needed someone to get the independant voters. And right now, the way things are with govt, I don't think he could have picked anyone to get those votes.






GC
said
0 0

Given the recent fear in Canada for a Harper majority, consider this:

Obama is a hardened ideologue; he is looking to make fundamental changes in the US. Changes that diminishes individual liberty for the soft authoritarianism of socialism through a massive centralized government.

If the Democrats control Congress with led by Nancy Pelosi, where is the check and balance?


KC
said
0 0

Palin's guilt over the ethics probe did no damage to her support - she has a core cult following & thankfully not many. She's an unethical candidate & that weighs big on discerning voters. Put into perspective, even Nixon & Bush maintain a 25% average support base ....

ripperjack
said
0 0

1-2-3-4-I declare a thumb war


Don
said
0 0

The 'scary' part is the delight Palin takes in the crowd's offensive shout-outs at her rallys. If ever there was a need to catapult someone into the sun before they screw up the earth, the time is now. Only an complete electoral drubbing will keep the Repubs from trotting her out again in 4 years. Since they are now feeding on each others political carcasses, a McCain win seems most unlikely. Whew...


RRO
said
0 0

The McCain Campaign has had massive internal issues since the nomination. His staff has changed so many times its not even funny.

The McCain insiders needs to blame someone else because they want to get jobs after this campaign.

I believe Sarah Palin would be a great candidate but she needs to get out from the McCain thumb and show herself as an independent person. The Republicans should write McCain off, and use whats left of the time to build Sarah Palin up.


Lillian
said
0 0

To JK---Tell me how the Canadian election is a joke. It seems to me that you are another mad Liberal who thinks that only a Liberal government has the right to govern this country. As for Obama, be careful what you wish for.


Jim in the West
said
0 0

I stil say that the best VP choice for McCain would have been Hillary. It would have united the country.

It really was the best decision that any of us could have hoped for.


Jack
said
0 0

To reply to Simon Shaw - Do you think education might have something to do with it. . .

Obama: A graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School, where he served as president of the Harvard Law Review, Obama worked as a community organizer and practiced as a civil rights attorney before serving three terms in the Illinois Senate from 1997 to 2004. He taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School from 1992 to 2004. Following an unsuccessful bid for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2000, he announced his campaign for the U.S. Senate in January 2003. After a primary victory in March 2004, Obama delivered the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention in July 2004. He was elected to the Senate in November 2004 with 70 percent of the vote.
As a member of the Democratic minority in the 109th Congress, he helped create legislation to control conventional weapons and to promote greater public accountability in the use of federal funds. He also made official trips to Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. During the 110th Congress, he helped create legislation regarding lobbying and electoral fraud, climate change, nuclear terrorism, and care for returned U.S. military personnel. Obama announced his presidential campaign in February 2007, and was formally nominated at the 2008 Democratic National Convention with Delaware senator Joe Biden as his running mate.
Palin attended several colleges and universities out of state, which was routine for Alaskans uncertain about their interests and attracted to warmer climates.[11] In 1982, she enrolled at Hawaii Pacific College but left after her first semester. She transferred to North Idaho community college, where she spent two semesters as a general studies major. From there, she transferred to the University of Idaho for two semesters.[12][13] During this time Palin won the Miss Wasilla Pageant,[14][15] then finished third in the 1984 Miss Alaska pageant,[16][17] at which she won a college scholarship and the "Miss Congeniality" award.[18] After the pageants Palin attended the Matanuska-Susitna community college in Alaska for one term. The next year she returned to the University of Idaho where she spent three semesters completing her Bachelor of Science degree in communications-journalism, graduating in 1987.[12][13]
In 1988, she worked as a sports reporter for KTUU-TV and KTVA-TV in Anchorage, Alaska,[20] and for the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman as a sports reporter.[21] She also helped in her husband’s commercial fishing family business.[22]



Joe
said
0 0

The Rebublicans knew they were not going to win this election, after Bush. They put McCain who is to old to run, since this is his only time and Palin who is expendable and a unknown. They didnt want to waste their real canadates this time around, but can use them in 4 years. Smart choice.
In 4 years, hopefully the states can be more sound, which will be perfect for the Republicans to make a stronger and better charge for the White House.


MuskyBuck
said
0 0

I have serious and grave concerns regarding any person purporting to be a leader of the largest economy in the world, who is on record and believes that global warming isn't a man made cause.


Ian in Guelph
said
0 0

I just wonder who his first choice for VP was, honestly. Maybe someday we'll all find out.

In the meantime, we get to be the ones leery of our "neighbours to the north" for a change.


MuskyBuck
said
0 0

@ Ed,

I have actually. 12 years in the media...never had a problem nor made myself look like an absurd character of myself.

Nor ever put myself in a situation of not knowing what I would be asked, etc etc...

Not a problem for me actually. Not sure why someone running for president could look like such an idiot all the time, unless of course....they are.


plumbers4obama
said
0 0

@GC (4th comment)

"Find me one mainstream news item that is anti-Obama? You will be surprised at how difficult that is...."

Answer: Faux News, I mean FOX news.


Rob from T.O.
said
0 0

Can someone tell me where I can find this liberal media, to me abc, nbc, cbs, cnn, msnbc, are all right wing biased corporate entities.


Alex (Toronto)
said
0 0

There has always been a know-nothing current in American conservatism, and Sarah Palin was chosen to cater to this voting bloc, which has taken over most of the leadership of the Republican party. Taking them out of office will mitigate the harm they have done, but knocking them back to the low forties in the popular vote isn't going to be a final blow against ignorance and intolerance in the United States.

Canada has been mercifully spared this flavor of conservatism throughout its history until recent years; only the quirks of Canada's first-past-the-post five-party system puts minority parties into office. Harper's Conservatives are trying to emulate the success of the Republicans; that's why they called the election to happen before the US election. The economic crisis shows the inherent illogic of unmonitored deregulation of the financial system, and the collapse of the Canadian dollar, not just relative to the US dollar but also compared to the yen, euro, and pound, shows that the world market doesn't trust Canada's economic policies, and this is going to impose a heavy cost on Canadian consumers.


8 years of failed policy boomerang back to McCain
said
0 0

GC said: “ This is pure media manipulation.

There is a cult like atmosphere around Obama and the media is in the US is doing all it can to influence this election. “

In fact it’s the reverse, it’s Bush Media manipulation that sent the USA into wars in the first place with misleading and suspect information’s. They was a “ Cult like atmosphere “ in the Bush team. They have mismanaged the economy to disaster by spending billons in the war, all this using credits to fund it.

The McCain campaign unfortunately reflect that 8 years of nonchalance and now pay the price. I call it the boomerang effect.

Most Americans and the world is seeing their livelihood falling apart. It’s not the American people to blame, I have lived in the USA they are proud, decent, hard working people.

As usual it’s their leaders that sank their American dream. Obama is the only candidate that can start new, frankly it can’t be worst than the last 8 years.


Jim in Edmonton
said
0 0

Man or woman, family comes first - Ms. Palin has a pregnant teenager and a downs child, if she were to be VP her family would suffer. 2. Most folks realize that she is not qualified to be president in the event that McCain passes away. He has had cancer and he is 72 going in - a big risk. No matter what McCain "says", he voted WITH Bush over 90% of the time, too late to distance himself now. By the way, if China, India etc. want to sell products to USA, Canada, products should meet same enviro and labour standards so we can compete.


Alex
said
0 0

If I was American and one year older, I'd vote for McCain/Palin, but I still don't get why Palin was chosen as his running mate. I share most of her beliefs, but I can't see her in a position of being prepared to be president.
Still, I'm hoping McCain/Palin wins, not necessarily because they're a good choice, but because they're a better choice.


Martin of NS
said
0 0

HAHAHAHA oh well... Obama was going to win regardless.


Doug BC
said
0 0

Tough times in the area of leadership in the USA too. I think the fact that the polls are still as close as they are tell us that voters are not convinced they want a liberal socialist in the Whitehouse. Especially if the Democrats control the Senate and congress at the same time.

Like here,a lot of voters aren't thrilled about either choice. But a "minority" situation such as ours does not seem to be an option still available.

I think a lot of people will be glad to see Mr. Bush ride into the sunset. But when the border closes to Canadian exports,the glee felt up here will be much less evident in the unemployment lines. We need their market of 300+ million people a lot more than they need our market of 32+ million.

Liberals would be well advised to find a leader like McKenna or Manley in these times. Canada will be needing negotiators who can be tough without being abrasive,outright rude,and able to tone down the anti USA nonsense within their party.

Sarah Palin,for all her lack of polish,is still the only "real person" on either ticket. Given how badly the career politicians have performed,it may well be a time for real people to hold office. It's not like they have to know everything. They just have to hire people who do,be able to digest and rationalize their advice,and make good,pragmatic public policy with all the information provided.

"Real people" look for solutions that are more pragmatic than politically expedient. Then they find a way to fight through the traditional establishment practises to get to where they want to go.
"Career politicians" are simply power brokers and slaves to special interest lobbyists.


HKP in Vancouver
said
0 0

Senator John McCain was my choice for President until he selected Gov Palin to be his Vice President.....what a poor choice THAT was..!!


Mel Blake
said
0 0

I am a Canadian living in the US, so I am watching this from the inside. While I disagree with Palin on many things, and would not vote for her, I have to be honest and note that the amount of media bias here is amazing. It is often hard to tell commentary from news items. For those anti-Palin, anti-McCain people I have questions: How much do Obama, Biden and McCain spend on clothes, hair and makeup? Nobody cares. A woman candidate? You betcha!

How many gaffes has Biden made? Why was the student who asked Palin about Pakistan not investigated on his taxes, background and qualifications by the media? Why has Obama banned a Florida station from interviews for asking hard question of Biden?

By the way, Obama has stated to his union that NAFTA will be renegotiated if he is elected. So you might want to think again about who is best for Canada.




Paul in Ottawa
said
0 0

McCain wanted a maverick running mate, and he got one.


CC
said
0 0

I think that the Republican Party chose the wrong man to run it to begin with. He does not have the charisma and youth to inspire. Obama is a great speaker, a great debater, and believes whole-heartedly in what he wants to do to America. Now...Obama's ideas and agenda is the likes of which the US has never seen before. He is going more to the left than America has ever seen. I am sure that Obama is a great man and is honourable. However, he will change the very foundation that the US is built on. He wants a more centralized socialistic Government. That will only serve well for the short term, but the individual states will not like it when he comes to sniff in their back yards. Many posters here seem to think that Republicans in the US are the same as Conservatives here, or Liberals and Democrats are the same. That is a complete misunderstanding of American politics. Canada is a socialist country...the US is not. That's why I laugh when Layton tries to endorse Obama. Even Obama is right wing to Jack. The in-fighting of the Republicans will carry on for quite some time. It is the natural course for any government who has power for that long. Absolute power corrupts. That's why the Liberals in Canada were smacked back into line. Same as the Conseratives in 1993. All partiesthat gain massive power go through it.


Ed
said
0 0

@MuskyBuck
Were your “12 years in the media” as a media-type or a politician? Were you picked for a job you may never have thought of or imagined, handled like a piece of property, and then thrust upon a global stage in the span of a couple weeks?
By your own admission, you had 12 years. Palin had maybe 12 days.
Before you made this blog post you had time to prepare your post – no cameras, no interviewer, no pressure. You messed up nonetheless. You suggest you never put yourself in a position where you didn’t know what you would be asked. Obviously, you weren’t interviewed by the likes of Couric, King, etc. You also imply Palin is running for President. MuskyBuck, that would be Vice-Preisdent.
If you can’t get it right here, imagine the pressure on Palin or Biden who are chastised when they use sound bites. Pack your condescension back in your briefcase.



Bristol
said
0 0

Noticed people on this site are saying 'go sarah go' - incredible how someone with such poor credentials can still excite a hockey-mom cheering section. Hey hockey moms, the world is a bit more complicated than cross-checks and shootouts. Thankfully the masses see through her fakeness and using her down syndrome kid as a prop and will vote for the only intellectual in this race - Obama


GC
said
0 0

re; the comment:

"Obama is the only candidate that can start new, frankly it can’t be worst than the last 8 years."

This is exactly my point.

I don't disagree with the views on the Bush administration - but that should not give Obama the free pass he enjoys.

Choosing Obama is not wrong; choosing him blindly is.




GHW
said
0 0

Choosing Palin the way he did was one example of why McCain is not qualified to be president. He makes rash decisions with little information. We saw this through his entire campaign on other issues too. He’s a classic unbalanced type “A” personality type.
What Obama lacks in hands on experience he makes up for in intelligence and wisdom. America doesn’t need another cowboy, it needs a thinker. For all you cowboys out there who only see the world in black and white don’t worry Obama will lose his luster soon enough. The fact is no one is going to be capable of climbing the American people out of the hole you’ve dug yourself into very quickly. Unregulated capitalism breeds unchecked corruption. McCain would do nothing to fix this.



Hunter Mars
said
0 0

Can't wait for the DVD "Nailin' Palin" comes out.


Victor King
said
0 0

With high expectation for change, the Obama camp better be prepared for any missteps. Hope they can handle it in the new year or else the media will be after Obama like a pack of wolves.


K. W., Alberta
said
0 0

A Democratic candidate elevated to godhood status, defeating a strong front runner in the primaries after coming out of almost nowhere, and a Republican who started out somewhat strong but picked a bumbling, blunder prone governor as his running mate, wrecked the campaign and now the entire republican side is slinging mud at each other..

Is it just me or is this whole campaign so over the top and ridiculous that if someone submitted it as an idea for an episode of The West Wing, that somebody would have laughed it out of the room?


BMIA
said
0 0

Whatever the outcome. I really hope it's a landslide victory. No ifs, ands, or buts. The U.S. has had back-to-back contested elections with victory even being discussed today.

I hope it is a clear and concise victory, no doubts, whatsoever, in the outcome. Massive landslide, actually.

I don't think the US or the World can afford another contested election and outcome for leader.


Jackie treehorne
said
0 0

I bet the Domocrats are loving this. It is making it too easy for them to win while the oppostion is falling apart. And I like cake!


Jen
said
0 0

Sarah Palin is no slouch.She is very capable and inteligent and can reach out and "connect" with people like McCain can only dream of doing. She is the passion in their campaign, without her no one who pay attention to the Republicnas...they are boring to say the least.
McCain took a huge risk getting her on board, and he and his croanies should do the honourable thing and give her all the support and coaching she needs.
Who cares how much they spent on her clothes, she's the same person inside....focus on the positive...the party owes it to her.
Sarah is a breath of fresh air and the "party should recognise that.

Paul
said
0 0

I don't think a 5- point deficit in the polls qualifies as a "widescale rejection".

I agree with an earlier post - this is pure media manipulation. I can't wait to see people's faces when, on election night, they realize just how close this thing is when the blowouts the media are predicting never materialize.

The United States is a centre-right nation, and John McCain fits.


Charles from Brampton, ON
said
0 0

McCain should have picked Luisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal for VP. He would have been a much better running-mate.

Here's why:

He can match Obama's race card since he is a visible minority (Indian-American).

He's a super-religious catholic (pro-life etc) which would appeal to the Republican base.

And he's EXTREMELY intelligent and well-traveled - (Rhodes scholar - studied in England, was accepted to Harvard Med and Yale Law but turned them down).

Jindal is basically the Republican Barack Obama. Watch for him in 2012.

Leslie
said
0 0

It is time for the United States to take rest & heal herself. China is the superpower now. Like all empires. The United States has fallen. Obama will not make any impact - he gives the illusion that "change" will come. Obama is a charasmatic man, like Clinton & Kennedy. However, Obama is hanging on the coat-tails of Biden. The Americans want Young & refresh & that is Obama. Young doesn't listen to experience, Young doesn't see the future. Young is only Young. China, Europe & Arab Nations will eat Obama for breakfast.

Canada is taken over where the United States left off. It is Canada's turn. We Canadians have been in the closet for too many years. I hope Canada will be more gracious to the Americans. We Canadians have benefited a great deal from the United States.


Gregor
said
0 0

What's most unfortunate is the treatment this woman has been getting in the press. Largely it of the same ilk that Hilary got whilst running against Obama. Regardless of who the person was there is still a huge gender bias. Coupled with that the 'press' is so hopelessly supportive of Obama it really wouldn't have mattered who McCain picked. Palin is a political newby, but so is Obama. Obama is a guy with little experience, who hung out with a racist divisive preacher, and never attempted 'Change' in either the Illinois state or US Senate. At least Palin is only applying for the job of VP, Obama (who called Canada's leader President Harper) is applying to be president. More distressing is the number of Canadians who support Obama, one of the most protectionist politicians in the Democratic party. All you Canuck Obama supporters are going to get a rude awakening if he is voted into office.

Tony P
said
0 0

One must consider how much press Mr. McCain was getting prior to arrival of Sarah. People are talking the Republican party. Comes election day for those who need to remember a name, then Palin will stand out. Prior to her arrival the Republicans got very little press. No balance to Obama.


Sick of US Election
said
0 0

Just reading these comments I am struck by the cult of personality that's erupted around Obama. Just watching people worship this guy has finally allowed me to understand how dictators start out. Not to say that he is, nor supports dictatorship, but it's just scary how little criticism this man gets. Personally I could care less who the Yanks vote for, and it would be nice for other Canadians to start distancing themselves from the USA and its crazy politics. If you think any US politician, whatever their party, cares about us then you are nuts!


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz