CTV News | NDP platform focuses on 'working families'

Top Stories -   

NDP platform focuses on 'working families'

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Rosemary Thompson on the platform
Canada AM: Adam Taylor, Canadian Taxpayers Federation
CTV Newsnet: NDP Leader Jack Layton launches platform
CTV Newsnet: NDP Leader Jack Layton launches election platform, part two
CTV Newsnet: NDP Leader Jack Layton takes questions, part one
CTV Newsnet: NDP Leader Jack Layton takes questions, part two

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(89)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Sun. Sep. 28 2008 6:54 PM ET

NDP Leader Jack Layton unveiled a platform Sunday aimed at helping Canadian families, focusing largely on child care, and said he would fund the plan by raising corporate tax rates.

"Our plan does not include a corporate tax cut. Our priorities are those of the kitchen table, of helping families make ends meet," Layton told a rally at his riding of Toronto-Danforth.

The plan includes promises of giving families a new baby bonus, ensuring Canadians have better health care, and giving more financial help to First Nations people and students.

A major highlight of the platform is a new child-benefits monthly cheque of $400, which would replace existing benefits. That would mean a family that had two children and earned $75,000 would have an extra $2,140 per year.

The proposal would cost roughly $500 million in the first year, double for the next two years, and then by 2012 it would cost the government about $4.4 billion.

The proposal also includes a promise to devote $1 billion towards improving the lives of aboriginals, in a similar plan to the failed Kelowna Accord.

Layton said the platform would not create a deficit. But in the first year, it would boost government spending by about $8 billion; by the fourth year, it would be up to $18.1 billion.

Because of the high cost, the New Democrats say they would reverse the Conservatives' reduction of the corporate tax rate, boosting it to 22.12 per cent from 19.5 per cent. The Tories have promised to slash corporate taxes.

The NDP also says Canada would save $1.1 billion a year by pulling troops from Afghanistan, and spending some of the government's projected budget surpluses over the next four years.

Other highlights of the platform include:

  • A new $1,000-per-year grant to undergraduate students who qualify for loans
  • Devoting $1.4 billion to start a new national child-car program
  • A national home-care program for seniors that would cost $1 billion

Environment

Layton has also promised tough action on Canada's biggest industrial polluters. The proposal would generate $2.5 billion a year in carbon auctions, and would invest that money into public transit and environmental incentives.

The NDP leader has been bolstered by stronger-than-expected poll numbers for the party since the election campaign began earlier this month.

On campaign stops Layton has rarely mentioned the Liberals or their leader Stephane Dion. Instead, he has insisted he is campaigning against Harper and the Conservatives to get to the Prime Minister's Office.

In B.C., Layton continued to attack the Tories on Saturday.

"We're going to kick Stephen Harper out and put the Jack Layton New Democrats in," he told a crowd in Vancouver.

He also responded to accusations from Harper that a NDP government would be bad news for the Canadian economy in a time of global uncertainty.

"If average families are looked after, if they can pay their bills, if they can meet their monthly mortgage payments and keep they jobs, the banks will be just fine," he said.

"Let's get the fundamentals right for Canadian families."

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Ed Kammin
said

If there were ever any chance I would vote for the NDP in this election, it was ended by Jack Layton’s announcement that he would give up to $400 to families for each child they had.

While I agree with the idea that the State has no place in the bedrooms of the nation, on the other hand I believe that people should not have children unless they are reasonably certain that they can support them, in an acceptable, if not opulent fashion.

The NDP proposal would mean that those people who believe that, for whatever reason, they have to have eight, ten, or even more children would get a handout from the Government greater than many people’s idea of a good full-time wage.


David Dunlop
said

With 50 Billion in new taxes many Canadian industries will simply leave Canada, some will go out of business, some will lay off workers or reduce wages and the rest will pass on the increased cost of doing business to the customers. Jack is a loon with no real plan.


Bob C
said

Poor Jack just does not get it! His Father, Bob Layton must be rolling over in his grave. He has just blown his very small chance to lead the NDP into becoming the official Opposition.


Will Heder
said

This is a plan that Canadians want!! This is very fiscally responsible and very socially progressive. This is a country that I would be even prouder to live in!!!
We must unite behind Jack Layton and truly get a government that is for the people.


JD in Alberta
said

Prime Minister Jack Layton. Sounds VERY scary. If that would happen I would look forward to western separation.


PM
said

Lets see what good old Harper will say: "The NDP will drive us into a 20 billion dollar deficit".


Dave Craig
said

Another great reason why NOT to vote for the NDP. higher taxes, massive ppending just when the North American economy is in recession. Sounds a lot like Bob Rae and look at how Ontario turned out after 5 years.

The scary thing is that the NDP is close to becoming the official opposition with Dion's campaign a disaster.




Ontario Taxpayer
said

Being the curious type I am...I must ask..."How", or should I ask "who"..is going to fund this NDP spending spree?


Mark - Vegreville, AB
said

Note to Jack:

A competitive Canada with lower overall tax rates, less government interference, less social engineering schemes, etc., creates more jobs and more income for families. Your idea, while well intended creates a far less competitive Canada where those of us fortunate to have a job after you drive away investment and jobs to more business friendly environments will be paying more and more to prop up your programs. As a typical working stiff, I can appreciate your compassion for people like me, but history indicates that this idea of yours is a failed one. Environmental laws are fantastic, but let us not make it so business is driven out of business or away from here while we try to save the world for the working family.


Gord in Regina Sask
said

Let me guess what the background music for NDP was today:

"Hands in my pocket, hands in my pocket, hands in my pocket....

Before you ask what is in your wallet, think about the fact that this is a dangerous platform that will bankrupt the country.

Major budget surpluses mean Canadians are being over taxed. There is nothing that mentions debt reduction.

Mr. Layton also doesn't understand that corporations create jobs, and by increasing their taxes, there will be less Canadians working to put food on the table.

The amount of tax I pay per year is equivalent to the gross annual income of many individuals. Thanks, but I work very hard for my money and don't wish to pay anymore into Jack's plan. Thank goodness the polls show he has no chance of running the country. I'd like to keep a little more of what I make and I am sure you would too.


One can always dream . . .
said

Jack is dreaming in technicolor - but then he can afford to do so.
The best he can possibly do is form the official opposition.


Bo
said

Jack, that's right, keep spending our children's money.....I used to be a liberal, but seeing how far the liberals have moved to the left, I am now a conservative supporter. Vote NDP is so out of question.


Greg in the Hammer
said

I wonder where Jack has his money tree hidden. I listened to a lot of this speech and was flabergasted by the wanton spending this platform promises on pie in the sky programs.


david
said

$5000 per child!! I am going to start breeding like a rabbit! We would be a 3rd world country in one year if NDP ever gained control.


Armel Doiron
said

It is nice to see that a would be leader want to help new families, but he is also failing to recognise that a lot of the work force are in the middle aged class and their childrens are grown up and moved on. The cost of living still goes up and there is no sign of tax relief for the working class. You just lost the idea of me voting NDP.


canuckgirl
said

Sad... I had a absolutely stellar NDP candidate in my riding (who far outshown the others in their lists of qualifications).
I was all set to 'vote local' as there is no one on the Federal level I felt happy about. Now I cannot in good conscience 'vote local' for the best candidate as I would be ultimetely endorsing one of the worst economic platforms ever. Has Jack Layton not read the news lately? We all need to watch our money and spending.
What's a middle of the road Canadian to do?
I never understood how anyone could be an undecided voter until now. There is NOTHING good to decide upon. Just a series of ill-thought out platforms.


Jay McDonald
said

First off...none of you were planning or thinking of voting NDP, so your opposition is predictable and your indignation...funny.

Layton said clearly:

a) the spending is dependent upon a balanced budget - not balanced, then reduced spending to balance it, and

b) the money is coming from $50 billion in corporate tax cuts that are scheduled (not in place).

Also....those corporate tax cuts would only go to companies that make money. Banks and oil companies will cleanup with Harper and Dion because they are raking in billions, and auto-manufacturers, forestry, and small business will starve because their income is low or non-existent.

Well done Jack. Well done.


Bob in Ottawa
said

Mr. Layton just doesn't get it at all. Corporations don't pay taxes - they pass them on to ordinary Canadians and families in the form of lower wages, fewer jobs, lower dividends (including dividends paid to pension plans like the CPP, Teachers), etc. In the end, if taxes are too high, they simply leave. Look at Ireland and the other economic leaders - they've figured it out - lower income taxes for citizens and business and higher VATS (i.e. GST), with appropriate income tax credits or other benefit payments. The best way that government can help ordinary canadians is putting in place a solid regulatory environment and let businesses create wealth through jobs. Too bad Jack is still living in the discredited interventionist world ...


Will
said

With everyone receiving boats loads of cash and everyone no longer having to work....who'll pay for this..?? The US maybe..???


Exiled Canadian
said

Layton complains that jobs are being shipped overseas and then turns around and gives a reason for business to do just that by increasing their taxes in the midst of an economic downturn.

His populist message will resonate with folks who think the government should fund their lives but most Canadians realize that this type of socialist attitude simply never works. You just need to look at what the nanny-welfare states did to Europe before they woke up and started adopting more conservative policies to get them back on track with reality. That's the reason why Europeans have chosen to elect leaders such as Sarkozy, Berlusconi and Merkel.

Thank goodness the far, far left does not have enough support to take over here.


Raymond
said

Way to go Jack...you just dropped the keys to Stornoway...and a relieved Stephane Dion just grabbed them back.


nc in alberta
said

It's funny the same people who oppose higher taxes for corporations scream bloody murder when one these same corporations' take in record profits and their CEO takes home a $30 million bonus all while ordinary people pay massive price gouges for whatever consumer commodity that said corporation produces.

You can't have it both ways.

Either corporations have free reign to unlimited profits at our expense, or the government returns some of their profits to the consumer by way of taxation and program spending.

just an observation...


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

You can always count on Jack Layton for a good laugh.

If I were to craft an unworkable, socialistic plan that's economically flawed and certain to push Canada into a recession (while putting a smile on the face of all the greedy do-something-for-me lovers of public "welfare") it would look just like his.

Abruptly yanking our troops out of Afghanistan is also something I'd do if I wanted to show the world (and our own brave military) how selfish, isolationist, and pigheaded Canada is.

Take all our money with reckless abandon, Jack; and spend us into oblivion!


rebel7
said

Yeah, yeah, more tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations and hopefully it will trickle down. Yes! that's the ticket.
Back in the 50's and 60's we were taxing the rich to about 80% of their income and we had a healthy middle class and economy. Today the corporations pay 19% and it still isn't enough. Billions have been taken out of the economy and given to corposrations. Are we better off? The answer is a resounding no! So I agree with Layton. Give money back to people and let it circulate around the economy and create jobs rather than keeping it in the bank.


Earl Robert
said

Wow what a stupid idea. See Jack run! See Jack spend. Yes,it's OUR money he wants to spend.


Jack "higher taxes for everyone" Layton
said

Jack Layton's policies are no different than the ridiculous US policies that have created the US economic meltdown. That policy is that the many must support the few because of VERY poor choices they have made in their lives. I am all for helping those who are really poor and destitute but why in the WORLD do we have to pay (when corporations pay, in the end we all pay) for families that can't live within their means, don't understand the meaning of budgets or place a higher priority on making money than raising their children. What's next for Layton and what will it cost us responsible Canadians??


Dayton
said

You know "Jack" all you had to do was become more moderate. The only way you will ever become Prime Minister is to start thinking like a CONSERVATIVE!!!


Pete Fisher
said

The most the NDP can hope for is to throw their support in parliament behind another party in order to stymie a vote which means that, at any given time, they can support or oppose any other party. Not very consistent.



Tim
said

Dear Jack,

Not one thing in you platform aligns with what I believe in. I for one do not expect the government to use other peoples money (taxpayers)to pay me for having children or to put my kids through school.
I do not believe we are finished in Afganistan just today a prominent female police officer was killed by the Talaban.
I am on a pension and am managing to pay MY - I say again - MY mortgage along with all of MY other bills. I do not need or want other Canadians to in any way, shape or form to pay my way. If I can't afford it I won't buy it.
Jack stay away from me and mine, your kind of politics sickens me. I am full grown and have been taught to take care of those I am responsible for.


Darcy Lindzon, Halifax
said

Modern, High Tech, Knowledge Based Corporations - Will Not Leave Canada.

Labour intensive and commodity based industries are already planning on leaving. There is nothing we can do about that. There will always be a country out there that will out-bid us.

Canada has one of the best trained workforces, with clean water, and relatively cheap power, high speed internet, and a lower corporate tax rate then the States.

Conservatives are stubbornly committed to being proven wrong about economic policy.

I sense that some Conservatives know that lower corporate taxes means more money in their pocket.

The well off know this and will do everything they can to manipulate people.

If it sounds simple...
...It's not not true.

Lower Corporate Taxes = More Jobs - FALSE

Lower Corporate Taxes = Higher Paid Executives and Shareholders - TRUE

The rules have changed since the 19th century.

Trickle down has been proven not to work.

It's time to trickle up!


Lawrence R. Meadows
said

Here is a leader of the NDP who has been trumpeting the loss of Manufacturing Jobs for the past 21 days. Couldn't have been serious now that he wants to tax corporations to play for Child care. What a rdiculous idea.


I work for a living Newmarket
said

Anyone who makes over 30000 a year knows we can not afford to vote NDP. They would tax the middle class to death to the point that it would not be worth while to work. Billions of dollars in promises. Look what the NDP did when they got into power in Ontario!, We still haven't paid of the debt they incurred. Look Jack Ontario gave billions to the Unions and the Poor and guess what? we still have poor in Ontario!


DCR-Toronto
said

Obviously Mr. Layton needs to take a course in economics. I am glad that the people of this country realize when parties go to far to the left. That's the reason Harper is so high in the polls. He is essentially the only centrist party left. And all of you who think he is this big bad right wing neocon should look at policys and see exactly what he is. His policys are in line with the Democrats in the US. Layton will never ever hold power, but I think it will be good for the Liberals if they were demoted to third for a few years. Maybe then they will get back to the centre. Jack Layton will drive our jobs away by taxing companys too much. Then where will he get his billions from for his "social projects" when everyone is on welfare. Yes, Harper will get his majority.


Marv
said

Jack we have limited funds in this country, get your priorities straight. Funding everything is unrealistic and economically disastrous.


Adam Gale
said

to JD in Alberta

I cant believe there are people like you responding to articles like that, if your against democracy and want to seperate because maybe someone would agree with there ideas as a whole then maybe people like you should seperate and leave and join countries that would support putting a 14 year old behind bars to be raped by an older cell mate. Its people like you who make me ashamed to be canadian. Why dont you do me and other people a favour and move out of canada.


Hos
said

This is stunning news from the NDP....It proves that the Liberal platform is indeed much better that any other party. At least Liberal like to hike taxes in the right direction to reduce gas emission....
My vote is liberal


Balgonie Bob
said

To say that NDP policies support working families is a farce because working families need jobs. Jack's policies would create a wholesale shutdown of businesses in Canada.


CC-western Canada
said

If Jack would start actually being realistic in his platforms he would actually be someone people would vote for. But when he comes up with things like this, he tosses his whole credibility down the toilet. People like him, but not his far left ideas. Dion must be smiling..well, as much as one can smile when clinging to second place. Layton will drive all big business elsewhere and bankrupt all the small ones. I wonder where he thinks these families, he speaks of, will get a job from.


Good question! - good answer!
said

canuckgirl said:

Q: "What's a middle of the road Canadian to do?"

A: Vote for the only middle of the road party - The Conservative Party of Canada, and its candidates.


Justin
said

Is it just me or can anyone else hear broken spending promises?


Bad economy equals zero social programs.
said

I wouldn't be sleeping well at night if I knew Jack Layton was Prime Minister. I consider myself pretty impartial. I voted for Paul Martin because he was fiscally responsible and last time I voted for Harper because of the same reason. I see no reason to switch as I really feel that the Harper government can once again be the most trusted to keep the country from following the US into bankruptcy. This time around the Liberals and NDP's economic policies really scare me.


Victor
said

Liberal votes moving to the NDP is a joke. I moved my old time Liberal vote to the Conservatives.

My business can't afford the 22% tax rate right now, and the Conservatives and Liberals have going to 15% - 17%. NDP wants to keep taxes for me the same and going up ? Crazy.

Why the NDP has it out for businesses is beyond me. When we close, where do the employees go?


AW in Thessalon
said

With the increased corporate tax, Jack Layton is not only affecting the large corporations, but small businesses. It takes more incentive away from the small business owner. Yet we have so much trouble finding capable help.


JR from BC
said

I pay $1500.00 a month in income tax. I deserve an explanation where my money goes!

Harper has provided me with the most responsible answer!

Dion and Layton would irresponsibly spend it!


Paul R. Martin
said

It is easy for Layton to promise the sky, the moon, chocolate truffles for everyone and a winning lottery ticket in your Christmas stocking. Any NDP platform is going to be unrealistic because the party knows that it will never have to deliver on its promises.


Edward
said

Prime Minister Jack Layton doesn't sound any worse than Prime Minister Harpet.

christian
said

yes jack! finally a great future prime minister who thinks about my family.
stephen harper (wbush) will put us in recession. make children not war!!!!!!


vicky
said

I agree with Kammin's comment.I think people should have children, if they can support them and not because kids are seen as a money generating machine. If the government wants to help families that are hard working and are responsible enough to have children, then the handout should apply to 2 children so that people are not having children for other reasons. Sorry to sound so judgemental, but while working as a cashier many years ago, I have seen mothers cash baby bonus checks to buy cigarettes. And I am not interested in working hard to give away half of my paycheck in taxes so that somebody can abuse the system.


Dean
said

Who is going to pay for all of this "free stuff" Jack? It must be nice to promise all this good stuff knowing you don't have a snowballs chance of ever forming the gov't. How could anyone ever be taken in by these give-aways? Socialism doesn't work!


Brad Richert
said

Wow, not one of the people commenting above have bothered to read party platforms have they.

READ THE PLATFORMS! Not one party wants to spend Canada into debt, be it Libs, Green, NDP, or Conservatives. Let's get serious and talk it out instead of the same cliche "NDP is spend spend spend" or "Conservatives are big scary monsters." Yes, if you are overly wealthy, no matter if you made your money honestly or not, the NDP will not be for you. Yes, a majority Conservative government will swing towards a Friedman "Chicago" style economic policy which will bring us right back to the selling out of Canadian businesses. This is their paradigm and they still think it works (but please, see Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Poland, Russia, China, United States, etc.).

The Libs are, and always have been, the mediocre party of Canada. They have always told people what they want to hear at campaign time and then turned around to do the opposite while stashing their pockets.

Let's face it, Canadian politics has surpassed American sensationalism in this general election. It is disappointing. The right-wing party gave up any amount of integrity once Preston Manning left the movement. The Liberals are getting what they deserve. The Greens have completely dismantled the traditional left wing hope, while the NDP will only make in roads through slow-moving grassroots movements since the media cannot support their policies.


George
said

All you Conservative supporters should be aware that Harper has 3 choices for the environment...
1. Follow the lead of many European countries, as supported by Dion, and bring in a carbon tax.
2, Follow the suggestion by Layton and charge companies directly, for the carbon they produce.
3. Do nothing more than the Cons have already presented, so that the situation will be even more desperate and the cost will be even higher in a few years.



Jim Mills
said

How many people believe and read these comments. I think that they all know that parties have people going around and making comments. This is a joke, people can think for themselves.
My job left the country even though we had tax cuts. America is entrenching.


jack asp
said

yes ed, in an ideal world people would not have children until they are ready to support a family. but the fact is, this is just not the case. so just because you do not believe in their decision to start a family does not mean we should leave them in poverty.


ABC now NDP
said

I can pick through the 'Van Loan" style trash talk being spewed by the neo-CONS here.

I can see the Libs are rebuilding, and not strong enough to lead at this time.

And I can see Jack Layton, along with the quality of Libby Davies et al, are fighting for my family and me.

My bank charges me to take out my own money.
My cell phone company charges me for the 'privilage' to access their network.
Oil execs are baking in Bermuda while I struggle to put gas in my tank to go to work.
So NO sympathy to the REALLY BIG business that will NOT get a further 2.5% tax discount from the CONs.

Hmmm, Jack wants to increase child benefits that will directly help my family instead of the CONs idea of paying for immigrants to move in!

I think I like where MY tax dollars are headed.

I guess I have just switched from ABC to NDP.

If you have a family, you may want to re-think your decision if you are considering the CONservatives.


Jason Blanks
said

Here we are and people are whining about supporting children! Yet have no problem sending those same kids to jail while ONLY 14!!! How sickening! I will gladly give my tax dollars to the NDP! Instead of the walstreet conservatives who continue to move away from Canada and cut costs regardless of what party is in power! I'm am sick of the high money making CEO creating dollars out of our hard work! YOU may think it is just your tax dollars but it is all of ours and I say NO to the conservatives and their billions in jail spending, warfare in Afganistan and no to any carbon tax grab! Good going jack for making a something for ALL Canadians instead of just the greedy whining minority!


Brad Winnipeg
said

If people want a REAL CHANGE, vote for the NDP. If you want the same old lies, and scandals the Canadian voters have been subject to, keep voting Liberal and Conservative. Look at the past 100 years. Why do people keep voting for the two parties that have been continuously caused scandal, misled us, misused our tax dollars, and generally ignore the real plights of the Canadian public? If you want some examples: Harper and the In and Out election financing scandal and the Bernier Affair, the Chretien Liberals and the Sponsorship Scandal and Shawinigate, the Mulroney Conservatives and the GST and a Airbus kickback scheme , Trudeau and his National Energy Plan, Diefenbaker and the Avro Arrow(we're just catching up now), and I'll just stop at the Liberal King-Byng scandal. This is all true, look it up. If you want to perpetuate this constant flip flop of government scandal and affair, keep voting Liberal and Conservative. Vote for REAL CHANGE, look past your misconceptions. Vote for the NDP. Go Jack!


RGP from Ontario
said

Interesting that Mr. Layton would pledge to give this money but makes no reference as to who would be eligible.

Existing laws DENY many tax credits designed to help parents/families to many people based entirely on their marital status. Given that there are more singles than married folks at this point in time, this sounds like only so much politiking to me.

While I don't agree with everything they do and say, at least with the Conservatives, I know where I stand.


JS
said

Jack sounds a lot like Dion, or does Dion sound a lot like Jack? I can't tell the difference. Their messages are the same, tax, tax, tax, and more tax. Jack says he is for the working people, but when you raise taxes, you are not for the working people. The ONLY way you are for working people is by lowering their tax burden and allow them to keep more of their money. If he raises corporate taxes, those corporations will go elsewhere to do their business, laying off Jack's working people.
Why should my tax dollars fund someone elses children? If people can't afford to pay to raise their children, then the easy solution is not to have children. Why should I have to pay for someone else's daycare expenses, just because those people can't afford to put their children into daycare. As I stated above, if you can't afford the expenses of raising children, don't have children!!! I am a single father of two young teens, have been for the past 9 years. I do not receive child support or any subsities besides the child tax credit, and I make less than $75,000 a year. So I do not wish to pay for anyone elses children, I pay for my own. With Jack's plan my taxrs would be a lot higher and my take home pay would be a lot less. Thanks but no thanks, Jack!!!


Todd Reaker
said

The NDP's ideas always sound and look good, until you realize who has to pay for it - the taxpayer.

As usual, they will get their 15 - 17% support.




Shane
said

If one is to assume that the people running for office are all idiots, than you have to realize that you don't know enough about politics.

All three national leaders are smart people that have the best intentions for the country. I doubt that any of the three of them would lead Canada to a national disaster.

Jack Layton, just like every politician. He says a lot at election time, but you are a fool to believe that any of the politicians would keep all of their election promises. Jack Layton's election promises are like a wish list, but not all will happen if he wins the election. Also it should be noted that he will not win the election, and Harper will. I find it much more upsetting that billions of dollars are spent on hand outs to international corporations and other countries. Those billions should be spent on the Canadian people directly through either better services, or huge cuts to INCOME TAXES.


Garry in NS
said

Why should my tax dollars be used to pay for other people's children (subsidized day care). If you have children, you choose to have them. Well, you can pay for them too!


Joyce
said

The NDP platform , of giving a family a $400 a month stipend for every child, is to me the Socialistic attitude, which says have as many kids as you like the State will help you, and in turn it is not the parents who make up their minds of how many kids they can afford, but Government does. That to me is irresponsible and unhealthy and gives families a false sense of being able to look after their kids.

This kind of platform along with Jack Layton's other promises is a platform of Canada going into a recession and Jck Layton's unfriendliness to business. Jack Layton forgets it is business which gives is the economic growth of Canada.

My family came from a Socialistic country where the youth do not want to work, because the State gives them a stipend every month, and thus they do not wish nor have the drive to be independent, because the State Stipend gives them enough not to worry about going to work. Where is the incentive and drive for youth to further their education in this. My father wanted a better place for his children and that is why we came to Canada.

I could think of more that Jack Layton could come up with but I certsinly do not want every citizen of Canada be taxed to death, because of platforms such as this coming to the forefront. His election pledges already are excessive.



Matt
said

I hate when Jack Layton uses the term "Working Families." Does he think he has a monopoly on the working families vote. I work very hard, have a family and would never in a million years support that guy.

In my riding i'm going to support Paul Calandra, the CPC candidate, because I think Harper has done the most to support working families in my lifetime.



Paul
said

Funny sounds like the LIBERALS,

Hey Jack and friends, do you want to give more money to rehabilitate serial killers too. What do you expect to equeeze the m oney from, oh yeah the TAX PAYERS.
It is apparent that you NDPers are out of touch with the population. A vote for Layton is a vote for Dion.

Paul Chilliwack


Robert McClelland
said

A question for all the conservatives screaming about spending: Where were you when Harper pledged to spend a trillion dollars on the military?

Obviously guns matter more to you than children do.


David Mancini
said

One more reason why Layton is looking more prime minsterial every day.

This is the kind of leadership this country needs. Why the hell do rich companies get OUR tax dollars to squander on whatever they hell they want.

Nice to see our tax dollars coming back to us in things that actually make a difference in our lives.

Layton is offering a family friendly platform, all within a balanced fiscal framework. Unlike the free wheeling (and free-falling) Liberals....

If this is the "New" NDP, bring it on.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

To "George":

Actually, in terms of the environment, most of us sane, rational, common-sense nuts think PM Harper has another viable option. (The "success" of carbon taxing in Europe is easily disputed, if you do your homework, and Layton's direct, corporate-penalty approach is foolish.)

Considering that Canada's contribution to world GHG levels is barely computable, we could maintain political and economic focus on those countries (like China) who actually tip the scale. At home, we could continue to support (even through tax incentives) cleaner forms of energy, conservation, and efficiency.

Wait! As a nation, with Ottawa's encouragement, we're already doing that!

Sorry, George. Continue to ride your bicycle everywhere, think "green," and keep a good supply of special fluorescent bulbs on hand...but Canada can't single-handedly solve a global problem with radical passion...as much as you'd like us to.


Mike
said

Question for you Jack. Where is all the money going to come from to pay for these programs when you drive out the corporations and the investments that they bring with them, which will result in massive job losses and a stagnation of the economy. They will fall on the average Canadian, which you claim to represent. So please don't say that you are trying to help, when in fact your programs will have a negative affect in what happens in mine and families dining rooms.


rosie
said

We are a family that makes between 75-100K.While it would be nice to get a couple grand for each of our kids,We also know that this platform will cost a lot of jobs.No corporation is forced to do business in Canada and if they choose to and can outsource to save money,they will.Better to create a better business environment through lower corporate taxes than to raise them and risk losing jobs.Jack is just making a promise he can't and wouldn't keep if they were elected.


Robert Brisebois
said

Tax & Spend!!

Typical NDP'isms.

We had a NaT party like that for 10 years or so I believe it was called Liberal.
We have a PROV. party like that in Manitoba, Its called the (Arrogant) whoops, I MEAN THE Non Democratic Party!!!


Ryan P.
said

Only one choice in this election folks for solid financial proposals, that being Stephen Harper....


Joyce.
said

Mr. Harper has never suggested he would spend a trillion dollars on the Military. Harper has finally done the Military proud and those of us who support our Military, for standing behind them and give them better equipment to work with, but it was not a trillion as is suggested in the comment section.
Our Military has not had the equipment they needed to go into Afghanistan, and it was the Liberals who sent them there but they did nothing to give them the necessary equipment to defend themselves.
By the way, I support and I am proud of our Military for what they do, they have been there through thick and thin where ever the country wanted them to go, and must say it was high time they were being thought of by this Government, for proper equipment they did not have going into Afghanistan at the beginning of their tenure there.


Bill
said

And just how does Mr. Layton plan on paying for all of this (on the backs of the working taxpayer and business)? Without business, jobs dry up. Wake up Mr. Layton and recognize how a country's economy is derived. Whatever happens in the USA has an impact here in Canada (given that the USA is our largest trading partner). The issues in the USA are not going to be fixed overnight, and our economy is going to languish for the foreseeable future. One only has to see what has happened to our auto assemby industry in the past few years, and the slow-down in housing starts in the both countries. Further, this is a global issued, not just a North American problem.


Shawn, Berrie
said

Economy is about to enter recession and NDP will raise corporate taxes to drive even more companies out of business? How is that "sound policy" Thousands upon thousands would needlessly lose their jobs if NDP ever won. NDP is going to make this job 10 time worse than it needs to be. What we should do if follow countries like Ireland that shlashed their corporate taxes to 10% and it went from being one of the poorest nations in Europe to having one of the highest GDP-per-capita in the world.


Darlene H
said

I was leaning toward a NDP vote, simply because Dion's platform is even worse for the average Canadian, especially the cross-the-board carbon tax point. With the unveiling of this platform, I was hoping to see a level headed, restrained approach given the current International economy. Big business will only pass the costs of increased taxes on to the consumer/average taxpayer and effectively lose any gains from social benefits. You can't win by beating the people you hope to speak for and represent. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to see where the votes will go on this one! I sadly must now reconsider my vote to back a opposition with more realistic economic outlooks. This might have worked in a burgeoning economy, but falls flat and possibly even creates fear in a world economy that needs to see fiscal responsibility.


I used to vote Green
said

Way to Go Jack!!


Fed up with Blue & Red Crooks
said

I have read a variety of the comments posted here and wow!! -- I will be surprised if my comment gets posted because the CTV is sooooo terribly conservative. They never post my comments. Very biased and so are most of the comments they have approved to appear here. Fishy.
#1-- If a business -- big or small -- is planning to leave Canada and take the jobs with them, they are going to leave no matter what % of tax they are paying. It's all about GREED! They've been leaving in droves for years and who was in power then? So, get your head above the dirt and take a REAL look around. How patriot are these company owners? Let them leave --- They can take advantage of others in another country then. I'm tried of being shafted!! 2. Yes, families -- is that not such a novel thing to consider -- North Americans are selfish and only think of themselves -- Screw grandma and her great-grandchildren. You can learn A LOT from the European family-unit, Canada. It's call caring and sticking together -- Family. 3. Jack should do two more things -- Fix labour standards in every province. Make labour standard Federal policy and throw their weight at these companies who constantly stick it to the little guy/girl who make them rich. -- Fix EI. This is biggest scamming, most unaccounted for federal program over the last 20 years. How many billions in surplus do they have now, what are they doing with it and why the heck aren't they making companies create and retain REAL jobs that can actually decently support a family? Most crooked program that was ever created and maintained. Clean it up!


Layton B in Moncton NB
said

This is a good start but does not really do anything to encourage business growth. It certainly has its merits but Mr. Layton should look at taxing overseas imports instead of businesses here. After all, its the fact that our manufacturing jobs have been allowed to slip away that will hurt Canadian families the most. Jack knows this but has not addressed this as I see it. A strong middle class needs a strong manufacturing base. Our economy cannot be based on Alberta and Newfoundland oil alone as Mr. Harper seems to think. Overall I am still leaning towards an NDP vote but not leaning so hard now. Lets just say I am still on the fence.


Henry Lorteau
said

I know that children are the future but also there is single people that need the help also.


Doug M.
said

NDP just lost my vote....why should people who chose ( yes made a decision to have children) be rewarded AGAIN!!! Many working people have decided not to have or maybe could not have children...why are we penalized?


sam
said

What a wonderful platform!!!
I will quit my full time job and change my career to be a full-time overnight husband!!! I will work very hard with my wife every night in our bed to get $400.00 per month, woooooooooowwwww nice, actually very nice!!! Go jack go!!!!!!!!!!!


Victor
said

Again, people are skeptical about the honest pro-conservative comments on this board as if they are being invented.

Question: Are these so called people in the Conservative war room also answering the telephone polls from your home phone ?

Someone has to be asnwering the polls running at about 36%-40% Conservative........it just can't be that people are actually voting Conservative can it ?

Duh. Believe it.


Corey in Manitoba
said

For all you people out there that think that the cons are going to put a 14 year old in jail to get molested etc. I do not think that a 14 year old kid will spend too much time in an adult facility until he/she is 18. Then they would be transfered into the adult system, much as it is now. The 14 year old would still be required to get an education etc in prison, much like now.

So basically the only thing that might change is the length of there term. And if you believe that a 14 or 15 year old that steals cars or does petty crime is going to go to jail for a long time, you have not seen our judicial system lately. They will probably end up with shorter sentences that they receive right now.

On another point. I like Jacks platform. At least you know where he stands. Most other leaders tell you one thing and do another. He won't get any more votes, but at least he is consistant


Charles Reid
said

Congratulations Jack. You have just discovered the British Labour party's manifesto from over 50 years ago.
I still remember Dennis Healey (finance minister at the time) stating"We are going to tax the rich until they scream for mercy", and if anyone doesn't know what happened to Britain from then on, the answer is, the country went into the biggest economic slide since the depression and didn't recover until Margaret Thatcher came to power.
As for the rich, Healey was going to squeeze until they screamed for mercy. They just packed up, took their money and moved to another country,
By the way Jack, maybe you should also adopt the Labour Party's song from those days. It was titled "We'll keep the Red Flag flying high" and it was sung to the Christmas tune "Oh Christmas Tree". Kind of appropiate don't you think


A Concerned Canadian
said

Although none of the main three parties (Liberal, NDP, Conservative) are going anywhere near far enough to realistically address the critical environmental problems facing the world today, at least the NDP and Liberals are acknowledging that there is a serious problem there, and not just completely ignoring the issue, or just paying it lip service, like the conservatives appear to be doing, as if it were only some minor matter in the schme of things.

Economic and even social policies will not matter a whole lot in another twenty years or so if we do not bring a party into power now that will acknowledge that the world's environmental situation has reached a critical point, and start taking immediate and effective steps toward addressing this critical problem, no matter how tough it is to implement, and no matter how loud the rich complain that it is cutting into their profit margins.

Our younger generation is depending on us to get it right so they at least have some chance at a future. Canadians got by just fine in the past before corporations came onto the scene, and they will find a way to survive if and when the corporations leave as well.

Canadians need to stop letting their calculators do the decision making for them and open their eyses and start looking at what is really going on around us in this world. Have we have become so accustomed to having everything handed to us on a platter that the thought of having to tighten our belts and bite the bullet, and God forgive, pitch in to help others in our country who are less fortunate than us, or who are struggling just to make ends meet, seems so absurd?



J. Jones Kamloops
said

This is the first proposed budget that I would vote for. Corporate taxes are already the lowest in the world. Our export industry is energy and it will make no difference what the tax is.


Marg, Richmond
said

Interesting that Jack Layton says he wants to help "working families" by all of his massive spending policies. I think most "working families" prefer to keep working in a good economic environment, rather than wanting to depend on government hand-outs. Who does he think will pay for all these programs he is promising? Why "working families" of course.


Gail (Hamilton)
said

Jack Layton supporting working families is a joke. His progressive ideas would scare business away leaving less working families and more asking for EI.

The government's first priority is to protect it's citizens; hence we need a strong military. Our children and grandchildren need that protection too. Giving people a hand up to achieve their goals is far better than handouts which is just wealth redistribution. It's better to be in pursuit of happiness and feeling good about yourself rather than government robbery of those who are successful. The Liberals need to get back to the Centre, instead of pursuing a leftist agenda, if they want to get back into government.


eric toronto
said

Sad! After Liberal, another party's leader seems out of touch with common sense. I don't really want to cheer for a conservative majority, but comparing to Lib and NDP, Harper looks like the adult matching against two teenagers. Please, get the kids off the court and get us a real match!


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

CTV.ca Specials

Election 2008

Election 2008: Full Coverage

Extensive and exclusive coverage of the federal election campaign.

Election Blog

CTV Election Blog

Notes from Craig Oliver, Robert Fife and the CTV News election team.

My vote: Arthur A. Leach School

My Vote

What issues are important to you? Send a video and let us know.

CTV Broadband

CTV Video Player

Watch breaking news, features and exclusive specials on Election 2008.

Battleground 2008

The Strategic Counsel surveys 45 swing ridings.

Poll Tracker

Poll tracker

Strategic Counsel's latest numbers from 'Battleground 2008.'

Mobile Updates

Mobile Updates

Sign up for campaign alerts and election night results.

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz