News Sections
NDP platform focuses on 'working families'
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(89)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sun. Sep. 28 2008 6:54 PM ET
NDP Leader Jack Layton unveiled a platform Sunday aimed at helping Canadian families, focusing largely on child care, and said he would fund the plan by raising corporate tax rates.
"Our plan does not include a corporate tax cut. Our priorities are those of the kitchen table, of helping families make ends meet," Layton told a rally at his riding of Toronto-Danforth.
The plan includes promises of giving families a new baby bonus, ensuring Canadians have better health care, and giving more financial help to First Nations people and students.
A major highlight of the platform is a new child-benefits monthly cheque of $400, which would replace existing benefits. That would mean a family that had two children and earned $75,000 would have an extra $2,140 per year.
The proposal would cost roughly $500 million in the first year, double for the next two years, and then by 2012 it would cost the government about $4.4 billion.
The proposal also includes a promise to devote $1 billion towards improving the lives of aboriginals, in a similar plan to the failed Kelowna Accord.
Layton said the platform would not create a deficit. But in the first year, it would boost government spending by about $8 billion; by the fourth year, it would be up to $18.1 billion.
Because of the high cost, the New Democrats say they would reverse the Conservatives' reduction of the corporate tax rate, boosting it to 22.12 per cent from 19.5 per cent. The Tories have promised to slash corporate taxes.
The NDP also says Canada would save $1.1 billion a year by pulling troops from Afghanistan, and spending some of the government's projected budget surpluses over the next four years.
Other highlights of the platform include:
- A new $1,000-per-year grant to undergraduate students who qualify for loans
- Devoting $1.4 billion to start a new national child-car program
- A national home-care program for seniors that would cost $1 billion
Environment
Layton has also promised tough action on Canada's biggest industrial polluters. The proposal would generate $2.5 billion a year in carbon auctions, and would invest that money into public transit and environmental incentives.
The NDP leader has been bolstered by stronger-than-expected poll numbers for the party since the election campaign began earlier this month.
On campaign stops Layton has rarely mentioned the Liberals or their leader Stephane Dion. Instead, he has insisted he is campaigning against Harper and the Conservatives to get to the Prime Minister's Office.
In B.C., Layton continued to attack the Tories on Saturday.
"We're going to kick Stephen Harper out and put the Jack Layton New Democrats in," he told a crowd in Vancouver.
He also responded to accusations from Harper that a NDP government would be bad news for the Canadian economy in a time of global uncertainty.
"If average families are looked after, if they can pay their bills, if they can meet their monthly mortgage payments and keep they jobs, the banks will be just fine," he said.
"Let's get the fundamentals right for Canadian families."
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
CTV.ca Specials
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(89)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.








Comments are now closed for this story
Ed Kammin
said
While I agree with the idea that the State has no place in the bedrooms of the nation, on the other hand I believe that people should not have children unless they are reasonably certain that they can support them, in an acceptable, if not opulent fashion.
The NDP proposal would mean that those people who believe that, for whatever reason, they have to have eight, ten, or even more children would get a handout from the Government greater than many people’s idea of a good full-time wage.
David Dunlop
said
Bob C
said
Will Heder
said
We must unite behind Jack Layton and truly get a government that is for the people.
JD in Alberta
said
PM
said
Dave Craig
said
The scary thing is that the NDP is close to becoming the official opposition with Dion's campaign a disaster.
Ontario Taxpayer
said
Mark - Vegreville, AB
said
A competitive Canada with lower overall tax rates, less government interference, less social engineering schemes, etc., creates more jobs and more income for families. Your idea, while well intended creates a far less competitive Canada where those of us fortunate to have a job after you drive away investment and jobs to more business friendly environments will be paying more and more to prop up your programs. As a typical working stiff, I can appreciate your compassion for people like me, but history indicates that this idea of yours is a failed one. Environmental laws are fantastic, but let us not make it so business is driven out of business or away from here while we try to save the world for the working family.
Gord in Regina Sask
said
"Hands in my pocket, hands in my pocket, hands in my pocket....
Before you ask what is in your wallet, think about the fact that this is a dangerous platform that will bankrupt the country.
Major budget surpluses mean Canadians are being over taxed. There is nothing that mentions debt reduction.
Mr. Layton also doesn't understand that corporations create jobs, and by increasing their taxes, there will be less Canadians working to put food on the table.
The amount of tax I pay per year is equivalent to the gross annual income of many individuals. Thanks, but I work very hard for my money and don't wish to pay anymore into Jack's plan. Thank goodness the polls show he has no chance of running the country. I'd like to keep a little more of what I make and I am sure you would too.
One can always dream . . .
said
The best he can possibly do is form the official opposition.
Bo
said
Greg in the Hammer
said
david
said
Armel Doiron
said
canuckgirl
said
I was all set to 'vote local' as there is no one on the Federal level I felt happy about. Now I cannot in good conscience 'vote local' for the best candidate as I would be ultimetely endorsing one of the worst economic platforms ever. Has Jack Layton not read the news lately? We all need to watch our money and spending.
What's a middle of the road Canadian to do?
I never understood how anyone could be an undecided voter until now. There is NOTHING good to decide upon. Just a series of ill-thought out platforms.
Jay McDonald
said
Layton said clearly:
a) the spending is dependent upon a balanced budget - not balanced, then reduced spending to balance it, and
b) the money is coming from $50 billion in corporate tax cuts that are scheduled (not in place).
Also....those corporate tax cuts would only go to companies that make money. Banks and oil companies will cleanup with Harper and Dion because they are raking in billions, and auto-manufacturers, forestry, and small business will starve because their income is low or non-existent.
Well done Jack. Well done.
Bob in Ottawa
said
Will
said
Exiled Canadian
said
His populist message will resonate with folks who think the government should fund their lives but most Canadians realize that this type of socialist attitude simply never works. You just need to look at what the nanny-welfare states did to Europe before they woke up and started adopting more conservative policies to get them back on track with reality. That's the reason why Europeans have chosen to elect leaders such as Sarkozy, Berlusconi and Merkel.
Thank goodness the far, far left does not have enough support to take over here.
Raymond
said
nc in alberta
said
You can't have it both ways.
Either corporations have free reign to unlimited profits at our expense, or the government returns some of their profits to the consumer by way of taxation and program spending.
just an observation...
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
If I were to craft an unworkable, socialistic plan that's economically flawed and certain to push Canada into a recession (while putting a smile on the face of all the greedy do-something-for-me lovers of public "welfare") it would look just like his.
Abruptly yanking our troops out of Afghanistan is also something I'd do if I wanted to show the world (and our own brave military) how selfish, isolationist, and pigheaded Canada is.
Take all our money with reckless abandon, Jack; and spend us into oblivion!
rebel7
said
Back in the 50's and 60's we were taxing the rich to about 80% of their income and we had a healthy middle class and economy. Today the corporations pay 19% and it still isn't enough. Billions have been taken out of the economy and given to corposrations. Are we better off? The answer is a resounding no! So I agree with Layton. Give money back to people and let it circulate around the economy and create jobs rather than keeping it in the bank.
Earl Robert
said
Jack "higher taxes for everyone" Layton
said
Dayton
said
Pete Fisher
said
Tim
said
Not one thing in you platform aligns with what I believe in. I for one do not expect the government to use other peoples money (taxpayers)to pay me for having children or to put my kids through school.
I do not believe we are finished in Afganistan just today a prominent female police officer was killed by the Talaban.
I am on a pension and am managing to pay MY - I say again - MY mortgage along with all of MY other bills. I do not need or want other Canadians to in any way, shape or form to pay my way. If I can't afford it I won't buy it.
Jack stay away from me and mine, your kind of politics sickens me. I am full grown and have been taught to take care of those I am responsible for.
Darcy Lindzon, Halifax
said
Labour intensive and commodity based industries are already planning on leaving. There is nothing we can do about that. There will always be a country out there that will out-bid us.
Canada has one of the best trained workforces, with clean water, and relatively cheap power, high speed internet, and a lower corporate tax rate then the States.
Conservatives are stubbornly committed to being proven wrong about economic policy.
I sense that some Conservatives know that lower corporate taxes means more money in their pocket.
The well off know this and will do everything they can to manipulate people.
If it sounds simple...
...It's not not true.
Lower Corporate Taxes = More Jobs - FALSE
Lower Corporate Taxes = Higher Paid Executives and Shareholders - TRUE
The rules have changed since the 19th century.
Trickle down has been proven not to work.
It's time to trickle up!
Lawrence R. Meadows
said
I work for a living Newmarket
said
DCR-Toronto
said
Marv
said
Adam Gale
said
I cant believe there are people like you responding to articles like that, if your against democracy and want to seperate because maybe someone would agree with there ideas as a whole then maybe people like you should seperate and leave and join countries that would support putting a 14 year old behind bars to be raped by an older cell mate. Its people like you who make me ashamed to be canadian. Why dont you do me and other people a favour and move out of canada.
Hos
said
My vote is liberal
Balgonie Bob
said
CC-western Canada
said
Good question! - good answer!
said
Q: "What's a middle of the road Canadian to do?"
A: Vote for the only middle of the road party - The Conservative Party of Canada, and its candidates.
Justin
said
Bad economy equals zero social programs.
said
Victor
said
My business can't afford the 22% tax rate right now, and the Conservatives and Liberals have going to 15% - 17%. NDP wants to keep taxes for me the same and going up ? Crazy.
Why the NDP has it out for businesses is beyond me. When we close, where do the employees go?
AW in Thessalon
said
JR from BC
said
Harper has provided me with the most responsible answer!
Dion and Layton would irresponsibly spend it!
Paul R. Martin
said
Edward
said
christian
said
stephen harper (wbush) will put us in recession. make children not war!!!!!!
vicky
said
Dean
said
Brad Richert
said
READ THE PLATFORMS! Not one party wants to spend Canada into debt, be it Libs, Green, NDP, or Conservatives. Let's get serious and talk it out instead of the same cliche "NDP is spend spend spend" or "Conservatives are big scary monsters." Yes, if you are overly wealthy, no matter if you made your money honestly or not, the NDP will not be for you. Yes, a majority Conservative government will swing towards a Friedman "Chicago" style economic policy which will bring us right back to the selling out of Canadian businesses. This is their paradigm and they still think it works (but please, see Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Poland, Russia, China, United States, etc.).
The Libs are, and always have been, the mediocre party of Canada. They have always told people what they want to hear at campaign time and then turned around to do the opposite while stashing their pockets.
Let's face it, Canadian politics has surpassed American sensationalism in this general election. It is disappointing. The right-wing party gave up any amount of integrity once Preston Manning left the movement. The Liberals are getting what they deserve. The Greens have completely dismantled the traditional left wing hope, while the NDP will only make in roads through slow-moving grassroots movements since the media cannot support their policies.
George
said
1. Follow the lead of many European countries, as supported by Dion, and bring in a carbon tax.
2, Follow the suggestion by Layton and charge companies directly, for the carbon they produce.
3. Do nothing more than the Cons have already presented, so that the situation will be even more desperate and the cost will be even higher in a few years.
Jim Mills
said
My job left the country even though we had tax cuts. America is entrenching.
jack asp
said
ABC now NDP
said
I can see the Libs are rebuilding, and not strong enough to lead at this time.
And I can see Jack Layton, along with the quality of Libby Davies et al, are fighting for my family and me.
My bank charges me to take out my own money.
My cell phone company charges me for the 'privilage' to access their network.
Oil execs are baking in Bermuda while I struggle to put gas in my tank to go to work.
So NO sympathy to the REALLY BIG business that will NOT get a further 2.5% tax discount from the CONs.
Hmmm, Jack wants to increase child benefits that will directly help my family instead of the CONs idea of paying for immigrants to move in!
I think I like where MY tax dollars are headed.
I guess I have just switched from ABC to NDP.
If you have a family, you may want to re-think your decision if you are considering the CONservatives.
Jason Blanks
said
Brad Winnipeg
said
RGP from Ontario
said
Existing laws DENY many tax credits designed to help parents/families to many people based entirely on their marital status. Given that there are more singles than married folks at this point in time, this sounds like only so much politiking to me.
While I don't agree with everything they do and say, at least with the Conservatives, I know where I stand.
JS
said
Why should my tax dollars fund someone elses children? If people can't afford to pay to raise their children, then the easy solution is not to have children. Why should I have to pay for someone else's daycare expenses, just because those people can't afford to put their children into daycare. As I stated above, if you can't afford the expenses of raising children, don't have children!!! I am a single father of two young teens, have been for the past 9 years. I do not receive child support or any subsities besides the child tax credit, and I make less than $75,000 a year. So I do not wish to pay for anyone elses children, I pay for my own. With Jack's plan my taxrs would be a lot higher and my take home pay would be a lot less. Thanks but no thanks, Jack!!!
Todd Reaker
said
As usual, they will get their 15 - 17% support.
Shane
said
All three national leaders are smart people that have the best intentions for the country. I doubt that any of the three of them would lead Canada to a national disaster.
Jack Layton, just like every politician. He says a lot at election time, but you are a fool to believe that any of the politicians would keep all of their election promises. Jack Layton's election promises are like a wish list, but not all will happen if he wins the election. Also it should be noted that he will not win the election, and Harper will. I find it much more upsetting that billions of dollars are spent on hand outs to international corporations and other countries. Those billions should be spent on the Canadian people directly through either better services, or huge cuts to INCOME TAXES.
Garry in NS
said
Joyce
said
This kind of platform along with Jack Layton's other promises is a platform of Canada going into a recession and Jck Layton's unfriendliness to business. Jack Layton forgets it is business which gives is the economic growth of Canada.
My family came from a Socialistic country where the youth do not want to work, because the State gives them a stipend every month, and thus they do not wish nor have the drive to be independent, because the State Stipend gives them enough not to worry about going to work. Where is the incentive and drive for youth to further their education in this. My father wanted a better place for his children and that is why we came to Canada.
I could think of more that Jack Layton could come up with but I certsinly do not want every citizen of Canada be taxed to death, because of platforms such as this coming to the forefront. His election pledges already are excessive.
Matt
said
In my riding i'm going to support Paul Calandra, the CPC candidate, because I think Harper has done the most to support working families in my lifetime.
Paul
said
Hey Jack and friends, do you want to give more money to rehabilitate serial killers too. What do you expect to equeeze the m oney from, oh yeah the TAX PAYERS.
It is apparent that you NDPers are out of touch with the population. A vote for Layton is a vote for Dion.
Paul Chilliwack
Robert McClelland
said
Obviously guns matter more to you than children do.
David Mancini
said
This is the kind of leadership this country needs. Why the hell do rich companies get OUR tax dollars to squander on whatever they hell they want.
Nice to see our tax dollars coming back to us in things that actually make a difference in our lives.
Layton is offering a family friendly platform, all within a balanced fiscal framework. Unlike the free wheeling (and free-falling) Liberals....
If this is the "New" NDP, bring it on.
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
Actually, in terms of the environment, most of us sane, rational, common-sense nuts think PM Harper has another viable option. (The "success" of carbon taxing in Europe is easily disputed, if you do your homework, and Layton's direct, corporate-penalty approach is foolish.)
Considering that Canada's contribution to world GHG levels is barely computable, we could maintain political and economic focus on those countries (like China) who actually tip the scale. At home, we could continue to support (even through tax incentives) cleaner forms of energy, conservation, and efficiency.
Wait! As a nation, with Ottawa's encouragement, we're already doing that!
Sorry, George. Continue to ride your bicycle everywhere, think "green," and keep a good supply of special fluorescent bulbs on hand...but Canada can't single-handedly solve a global problem with radical passion...as much as you'd like us to.
Mike
said
rosie
said
Robert Brisebois
said
Typical NDP'isms.
We had a NaT party like that for 10 years or so I believe it was called Liberal.
We have a PROV. party like that in Manitoba, Its called the (Arrogant) whoops, I MEAN THE Non Democratic Party!!!
Ryan P.
said
Joyce.
said
Our Military has not had the equipment they needed to go into Afghanistan, and it was the Liberals who sent them there but they did nothing to give them the necessary equipment to defend themselves.
By the way, I support and I am proud of our Military for what they do, they have been there through thick and thin where ever the country wanted them to go, and must say it was high time they were being thought of by this Government, for proper equipment they did not have going into Afghanistan at the beginning of their tenure there.
Bill
said
Shawn, Berrie
said
Darlene H
said
I used to vote Green
said
Fed up with Blue & Red Crooks
said
#1-- If a business -- big or small -- is planning to leave Canada and take the jobs with them, they are going to leave no matter what % of tax they are paying. It's all about GREED! They've been leaving in droves for years and who was in power then? So, get your head above the dirt and take a REAL look around. How patriot are these company owners? Let them leave --- They can take advantage of others in another country then. I'm tried of being shafted!! 2. Yes, families -- is that not such a novel thing to consider -- North Americans are selfish and only think of themselves -- Screw grandma and her great-grandchildren. You can learn A LOT from the European family-unit, Canada. It's call caring and sticking together -- Family. 3. Jack should do two more things -- Fix labour standards in every province. Make labour standard Federal policy and throw their weight at these companies who constantly stick it to the little guy/girl who make them rich. -- Fix EI. This is biggest scamming, most unaccounted for federal program over the last 20 years. How many billions in surplus do they have now, what are they doing with it and why the heck aren't they making companies create and retain REAL jobs that can actually decently support a family? Most crooked program that was ever created and maintained. Clean it up!
Layton B in Moncton NB
said
Henry Lorteau
said
Doug M.
said
sam
said
I will quit my full time job and change my career to be a full-time overnight husband!!! I will work very hard with my wife every night in our bed to get $400.00 per month, woooooooooowwwww nice, actually very nice!!! Go jack go!!!!!!!!!!!
Victor
said
Question: Are these so called people in the Conservative war room also answering the telephone polls from your home phone ?
Someone has to be asnwering the polls running at about 36%-40% Conservative........it just can't be that people are actually voting Conservative can it ?
Duh. Believe it.
Corey in Manitoba
said
So basically the only thing that might change is the length of there term. And if you believe that a 14 or 15 year old that steals cars or does petty crime is going to go to jail for a long time, you have not seen our judicial system lately. They will probably end up with shorter sentences that they receive right now.
On another point. I like Jacks platform. At least you know where he stands. Most other leaders tell you one thing and do another. He won't get any more votes, but at least he is consistant
Charles Reid
said
I still remember Dennis Healey (finance minister at the time) stating"We are going to tax the rich until they scream for mercy", and if anyone doesn't know what happened to Britain from then on, the answer is, the country went into the biggest economic slide since the depression and didn't recover until Margaret Thatcher came to power.
As for the rich, Healey was going to squeeze until they screamed for mercy. They just packed up, took their money and moved to another country,
By the way Jack, maybe you should also adopt the Labour Party's song from those days. It was titled "We'll keep the Red Flag flying high" and it was sung to the Christmas tune "Oh Christmas Tree". Kind of appropiate don't you think
A Concerned Canadian
said
Economic and even social policies will not matter a whole lot in another twenty years or so if we do not bring a party into power now that will acknowledge that the world's environmental situation has reached a critical point, and start taking immediate and effective steps toward addressing this critical problem, no matter how tough it is to implement, and no matter how loud the rich complain that it is cutting into their profit margins.
Our younger generation is depending on us to get it right so they at least have some chance at a future. Canadians got by just fine in the past before corporations came onto the scene, and they will find a way to survive if and when the corporations leave as well.
Canadians need to stop letting their calculators do the decision making for them and open their eyses and start looking at what is really going on around us in this world. Have we have become so accustomed to having everything handed to us on a platter that the thought of having to tighten our belts and bite the bullet, and God forgive, pitch in to help others in our country who are less fortunate than us, or who are struggling just to make ends meet, seems so absurd?
J. Jones Kamloops
said
Marg, Richmond
said
Gail (Hamilton)
said
The government's first priority is to protect it's citizens; hence we need a strong military. Our children and grandchildren need that protection too. Giving people a hand up to achieve their goals is far better than handouts which is just wealth redistribution. It's better to be in pursuit of happiness and feeling good about yourself rather than government robbery of those who are successful. The Liberals need to get back to the Centre, instead of pursuing a leftist agenda, if they want to get back into government.
eric toronto
said