News Sections
AIG bailout fails to calm markets; Dow, TSX drop
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(43)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. Sep. 17 2008 10:05 PM ET
North American stock markets dropped sharply again Wednesday, one day after the U.S. federal government announced it would provide a massive loan to keep insurance giant AIG out of insolvency.
Dow Jones industrial average fell 449.36 points to end the day at 10,609.66, despite a temporary bounce in mid-afternoon trading.
North of the border, the S&P/TSX composite index fell 349.30 points, finishing at 11,877.69.
"Essentially, we saw lending freeze up in the United States after the AIG bailout by Washington," BNN's Michael Hainsworth told CTV Newsnet after the markets closed.
"The street said, 'Wait a minute - if a juggernaut of this size is capable of failing, who else is?' So the banks tightened up the lending restrictions, and that really ground both Bay Street and Wall Street to a halt."
Late Tuesday, the Federal Reserve in the U.S. announced it would provide an $85-billion loan to save American International Group Inc. from collapse in order to protect the broader market.
"People are scared to death," said Bill Stone, chief investment strategist for PNC Wealth Management. "Who would have imagined that AIG would have gotten into this position?"
The Fed warned the collapse of AIG could "lead to substantially higher borrowing costs, reduced household wealth and materially weaker economic performance."
As part of the bailout, the U.S. government received a 79.9 per cent equity stake in AIG.
Earlier this week, nervous investors began bailing out of the market after Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy protection and Merrill Lynch agreed to be bought by the Bank of America.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley -- the two remaining Wall Street investment firms -- were being closely watched by investors Wednesday.
As stocks were being abandoned, some investors were buying gold as a hedge against rising risk Wednesday. The shift pushed the price of the December bullion contract by US$66.70 to $847 on commodities markets.
Overseas, Japan's Nikkei stock average jumped 1.2 per cent after AIG's rescue, but Hong Kong's Hang Seng index lost 3.6 per cent.
The FTSE 100 fell 249.7 points to 4,954.5, while Germany's DAX gave back 1.15 per cent and the French CAC-40 moved 1.6 per cent lower.
Meanwhile, Canada's Nortel Networks Corp. was the latest victim of the economic turbulence.
Suffering from "foreign exchange impact and certain product delivery delays" the company cut its revenue outlook to between two and four per cent less than last year. Shares fell $1.61 to $4.11, a new all time low.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(43)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.



Comments are now closed for this story
ELIE
said
GREG TROLLEY
said
DARREN CECCHETTO
said
James
said
James
said
Craig from NS
said
Companies should have learned years ago not to over spend, over invest or generally over extend themselves. This is a story of same old, same old.
It is astounding how many major companies in the states have been bailed out in the last week. The U.S. is fanatical for capitalism, but when that system is in trouble they pull a socialist move. Just more egg on the face of the Bush administration.
Nick T
said
A government bailing out a private company means that they are using PUBLIC funds collected through taxes to do this. It would be like the Canadian government buying Nortel with taxpayer dollars. That money can be used for other things, on the people that actually have a claim to that money, the PUBLIC. A private company with their own budgets and reserves should get their funds from customers, and if they can't, too bad.
I say let these private companies fail. Their greed and poor outlook is what got them there in the first place...
Don't panic, its darkest before the light comes
said
The US government has its hands full with this crisis. I have little confidence in either of the choices for President but if I had to choose I would take the Republican McCain over the totally inexperienced Obama. Obama sings a good song but he just has no history to bring to the table. McCain's experience is limited so neither is a good choice for America.
The silver lining is that these bad greedy deals are coming home to roost and being flushed out of the system.
There are literally trillions of dollars on the sidelines waiting for an entry point into the markets once the dust settles. In Canada our junior resource sector represents an opportunity for solid growth once the tide turns which should be soon.
FreakAlert2008
said
There is no such thing as 'public funds'. The bank notes and coins you have in your pocket is a private currency.
Rosie
said
Robin the Hood
said
John Public
said
Dean
said
Greed is is a human condition not political
said
The "right" once again is being falsely portrayed by Robin da Hood who is always representing the "left".
Greed is not exclusive to the right or the left, Robin. While the right believes in free enterprise and personal initiative and responsibility it is also important to point out that the left believes in governments running everything and little personal initiative or responsibility. The lines are clear between right and left but greed is not exclusive to either philosophy as some would have you falsely believe.
Steve in PEI
said
If the public good precludes allowing these institutions to fail, then those at the top of the corporate ladder should be severely fined and their wages cut or else just fire them and slap them with massive lawsuits. Key decision makers need to be humiliated and made to suffer, one way or another, for the public good to be served.
np
said
What is apparent here is that evrytime the US has a republican president they end up in deep finacial problems. The republicans are of course champions of free enterprise and everyone for themselves. How ironic that the struggling US public is now paying for this. I love capitalism when it's mixed with socialism. It really works.
Tony Di Donato Montreal
said
They say, we made 10 today let's try for twenty tomorrow.
Greed, greed, greed equals bankruptcy.
I for one have no debts, and I went through all the yada dada like most persons out there. Thanks.
Keenan, Moncton
said
Hmm.. with the way the economy's going, and a possible crash, you'd want someone to lead the country that you could trust to make the right decisions.
The Republicans didn't choose right. Anybody heard of the 80s scandal that cost billions of $$ to the american people, especially the pensioners? Keating Five
Nobody in the US media ever mentionned this. McCain was 1 of the 5 senators involved in the scandal, but was cleared, but not before he was told that he made really poor judgements.
I'm wondering, do you really want somebody like that as the Head of State?
Iskewa
said
Doug BC
said
I expect Mr.Bush and his administration will wear most of this.But the real mortgage trouble actually began as a result of the Clinton governments reforms regarding mortgages.They were convinced EVERY citizen should have access to a home,and the mortgages they needed to buy them.Mortgage brokers were forced by those new rules,to write mortgages to the poor,the unemployed and almost anyone who could cry "discrimination".
Sadly,all the chickens have come home to roost on Mr.Bush's watch.While I don't especially care for this administration,it is clearly simplistic to lay all the blame for this in their hands.
Mr.Bush's administration had no intention of doing this bail out with taxpayer dollars.Things changed when they figured out that taxpayers would pay much more if AIG actually did go under.The bailout,while an ideological issue for the government,is simply the cheapest way out of a very difficult hole.
And,while I rarely agree with "FreakAlert",this time I pass on a big "thank you" for the comment about "public funds".This is the current buzzword for people who want some kind of services,but want taxpayers to pay for it.
Lobbyists use the term "public funds" instead of taxpayer dollars in an attempt to disguise their request for funding.
Victor
said
AIG is not going away. Great company and if they qualify for 85 Billion in loans it shows value.
raven
said
eddytoronto
said
eddytoronto
said
Big-money
said
John
said
Dave in Waterloo
said
Andre
said
Heard it after Sep 11/2001, heard it when the tech stock bubble burst and now again of course.
The reality is that the markets do eventually correct themselves and start back on a stronger footing.
This crash will be no different.
Anyone making rash decisions based on what has happened over the last few days is taking a huge chance. Let the dust settle, then act. Right now, there is little anyone can do until the "big boys" have finished their hatchet job.
Marcel
said
Maggie Cynic
said
Joe Sanity
said
If i ad a hundred dollars
said
Andre
said
Interestingly enough, the consensus is that the rules that Clinton forced onto the banks are the ones responsible for this mess. It is under his watch that the credit rules were relaxed so that lower income people could get mortgages.
In fact, the NYT has published an article that shows that 5 years ago, Bush proposed to strengthen the supervision of Freddie Mac and Fanny May because of the huge exposure that was coming...and guess what, the Democrats voted it down.
As always, socialist governments trying to tinker with the economy may yield short term gains, but it is always the Republican who end up having to clean up the long term pain.
Patricia
said
GP
said
Speculators are pilling onto oil in an effort to manipulate those prices again. So is this the new cycle...speculators dump money from one place to another until they get a pile on effect then "profit take" then bail to another, and it goes on and on.
How does this benefit the economy, the small investor planning for retirement, or establish any kind of confidence in the market.
Glad I'm long past this and have no intention of putting my money back in...I'm happy with a smaller sustainable return as long as these bandits can't touch my money.
Stevie
said
Ian
said
Now that the US govt effectively owns AIG, and is already so intertwined with business interests.. how long until there is no longer a delineation between government and business?
Dan Waterloo
said
Wake up politically challenged. This is the opportune time. You will have no one to blame but yourselfs. Don't blow it
GP
said
It’s called a one-two punch and you're out...of all the money you have invested, everywhere.
The US economy is just one large financial negative event away from outright collapse which will last for years, maybe even a decade…if you’re an enemy of the US system now is your time to strike the ultimate blow. All because of uncontrollable greed.
Edmonton John
said
China does wield considerable power over the US economy. It is estimated that if they cashed in their bonds instead of renewing them, US taxpayers would face something like a 35% tax hike, and even then almost all social spending would be cut.
It would be devastating, but fortunately for the US it would destroy the greenback. China holds so much US currency in its reserve that much of its own wealth would be wiped out, so it simply can't afford to destroy the US economy!
The same is true all over the world. Almost all countries carry a trade surplus with the States, and therefore have a cache of US bills that they cannot afford to lose. Thus the US doesn't really have to worry about creditors demanding payment. They will continue to accept reissued bonds.
On the other hand, if the US GDP growth falters, and the debt/GDP ratio gets too high, it might put a ceiling on their ability to borrow, but realistically that is not on the horizon.
Rick in ?NB
said
Have you checked the Asian markets out. These are not just American problems it is a global issue. We are all one happy family, pass the butter please.
GG
said
It is time we take our countries back !!!
We need new party's in our government/governance system of democracy.
The gap between the rich and poor must end. To continue is unsustainable or is it too late ?!?
To all you thieves I hope you get what you deserve...take the next flight to deserted islands never to be seen again and enjoy your rip off moola..counting coconuts... and thank your lucky stars youre still around to count them over and over again.
Obama08
said
unfortunately, we'll all wear a bit of the long struggle back and he and all his republican friends will still be multi-millionaires trying to recall how many houses they own, oblivious to the pain of loosing one's only residence.