News Sections
Is 'fake news' informative? Study tests fun vs facts
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(19)
By: Andrea Janus, CTV.ca News
Date: Mon. Sep. 15 2008 4:50 PM ET
"One anchor, five correspondents, zero credibility."
You know it's not your grandmother's network news when one of the most popular information programs, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, advertises itself with such a tagline.
But Stewart is no Walter Cronkite, "real" journalists don't know whether to be happy, or horrified, that his show has more viewers in the coveted 18-to-31 age demographic than any other nightly news program in the United States.
For years now, pundits have speculated that young adults are more likely to get political news from The Daily Show, and its spinoff, The Colbert Report, rather than from network programs.
Research has shown that between 48 and 60 per cent of young adults watched fake news shows to get information about the 2004 American presidential campaign.
The good news is, mock news shows are outrageously funny.
The bad news is, they leave viewers less politically informed than those who watch real news, a new study suggests.
Researchers from Ohio State University found television viewers who watch fake news programs are less informed about issues and candidates in election campaigns than those who watch network news shows.
Young Mie Kim, co-author of the study and assistant professor of communication at Ohio State., said both news and entertainment promote some knowledge gain, "but people who are exposed to news gain more factual information and learn more about a wide range of important topics than those exposed to entertainment media.
Kim conducted the study along with former Ohio State graduate student John Vishak. Their findings are published in the Journal of Communication.
Stewart and Stephen Colbert, host of The Colbert Report, are household names thanks to their irreverent portrayals of news anchormen.
Stewart's show has won a Peabody Award, one of journalism's highest honours, for political coverage. Yet it advertises itself on its website as, "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart -- it's even better than being informed."
In a study of about 85 people, Kim and Vishak found that fake news show viewers:
- Retain more information about a political candidate's personal life and less about their positions on political issues.
- Retain less information about political issues and processes compared to viewers of network news.
Mock news shows may not be the best way to learn about political candidates and issues because viewers watch the programs to be entertained, Kim said. So they may not be paying attention to all of the details.
Are comedy viewers also news consumers?
Megan Boler, a professor of media studies and philosophy of education at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto, disagrees and points to other studies.
A 2007 Pew Research Center study found that fans of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report rank high in surveys of public affairs knowledge, she said.
Viewers of the shows are already informed before they tune in, Boler said.
"The Daily Show is not watched to the exclusion of other sources," Boler said in an interview with CTV.ca. "In order to appreciate satire you have to have background knowledge. You're not going to have pleasure watching The Daily Show if you haven't been talking to your friends about what's going on, following other kinds of news sources."
Boler argues that Kim's study, which showed viewers 20-minute video segments from either NBC and CNN or The Daily Show about a Supreme Court nominee, fails to take into account how viewers gather news.
More people are getting their news from a variety of sources, including blogs and Internet media outlets, in an attempt to be more politically engaged, she said.
Therefore, reaction to a single news clip cannot accurately evaluate a subjects' political knowledge because it does not reflect the fact that people rarely gain that knowledge from a single source.
And the study ignores the fact that many viewers watch the programs online, which has spurred a whole online, user-generated media industry.
"Through that online watching there's a level of citizenship engagement where people can comment on it, they can link to it on their blogs, they can talk to their friends about it online, so there's an intense kind of community building," Boler said.
At the end of the day, the role of satirical news shows isn't to be a single source of information for viewers.
"Most people are aware that part of the pleasure of watching the Daily Show or Colbert is that it's making fun of news formats. It's doing that both in content and form," Boler said.
"It's doing that by pretending to be news and it's doing it by using clips from actual news and then making a joke about how straight news is doing its job. And it's urging you to ask questions about the role of media in a democracy."
User Tools
CTV Programs
The Daily Show with Jon Stewart
'The Daily Show with Jon Stewart,' led by Time Magazine's 'Best Talk Show Host,' has taken the world by storm
The Colbert Report
Ever since 2005, Stephen Colbert, now a D.F.A., has been dominating the fake news landscape.
Related Websites
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(19)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Please Add Comments( )
Gail (Hamilton)
0
said
0
Randy
0
said
0
Nothing, neither are impartial, nor factual only partisan Liberal opinions. Newscasters have dumbed down, believing we are too ignorant to make informed decisions.
What Credibility?
0
said
0
Our local paper just ran a story intented to portray a senior being bullied by bylaw officers. When I checked the story out there was far more to it than that and he was not unfairly targetted. The paper refused to clarify the story as its intent was to outrage people and they had to bend the truth to do it. Truth in journalism is dead!
Éric
0
said
0
This is a good reminder that one must be critical of any study presented by the media because not all the facts are reported and also 85 participants is not a significant quantitative sample..
--
1 "National Annenberg Election Survey" (Press release), Annenberg Public Policy Centre (September 21, 2004), p.1.
Carson
0
said
0
If you're looking at The Daily Show / Colbert Report complex as somehow a primary source, you're doing it wrong. Their shows are humorous analysis, and they are pundits, along the lines of Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage. The problem is that traditional media has become so much about ratings, it's beginning to mix and match primary source information with analysis, so that unless there's a fast-paced and obviously event going on, like a hurricane, the truth gets muddied behind the "hard-hitting analysis" and it becomes difficult to tell which is which.
TDS/CR actually make fun of this, and have a strong point here -- they aren't a gigantic news network, they are two studio shows run on Comedy Central, and they don't do any actual reporting.
Comparing the two isn't so much as an ego boost for the Daily Show or Colbert, but a shot at the ego of networks, who while still doing their jobs, have become so intertwined with presenting entertainment to compete, have apparently lost focus on what it is they actually do, when compared to Comedy Central
Gary
0
said
0
me - anytown, usa
0
said
0
Shannon, Vancouver
0
said
0
Brad
0
said
0
KC
0
said
0
Rick in NB
0
said
0
Mark E
0
said
0
At least "fake news" shows make all this frustration entertaining.
Kevin(BrockU)
0
said
0
As for The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, and Real Time with Bill Maher, they are all amazing shows. I'd rather be informed in a humourous way simply because no news is good news, esepcially when you actually listen to what's going on, so why not try and lighten it up a bit. Last year one of my poli sci profs appeared on a newscast and he went so far as to say he gets most of his news from The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, and he was one of the best profs I've had to date.
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
-- Those who watch The Daily Show and The Colbert Report are more politically aware than the average dolt. (If you aren't politically aware, most of the humor is destined to sail right over your head.)
-- The writers/producers of these two shows also enjoy making fun of network newscasts and their continuing slide into foolish fact-fudging for the sake of puffing silly stories with little actual relevance.
-- The general public can only handle so much fear-mongering, slanted, biased, and redundant "news" each day; and these two shows are a refreshing resort to cut through some of the bogus nonsense we're bombarded with by legitimate organizations. Show me a "real" news junky and I'll show you an overly serious and depressing person who can't see the forest for the trees.
-- As part of the Hollywood left-wing entertainment machinery, these shows are a self-created opportunity for politically inclined talent to publicly voice their opinions while, at the same time, taking the odd shot at liberalism to appear somewhat balanced and comically sincere.
Ernie in Pritchard
0
said
0
Kevink (Montreal)
0
said
0
Bret
0
said
0
When the right can simply dodge questions, give answers that don't apply to the questions asked, there is no liberal bias. That isn't news.
CNN where we ask the hard questions, and then accept anything anyone throws out as an answer.
Is there a liberal bias to the daily show and colbert report, certainly. Is it because the Republican party has a huge majority of political shenanigans? Yes.
They showed clips of Clinton when he did his "Well that depends on what you mean by 'is'" testimony.
I guess it's unfortunate for the republican party that more of the comedy gold is produced by their party. This is why the article doesn't include Fox's "Red Eye" news show.
Webstir
0
said
0
I took it as the gospel.
I am pleased to say I have found the Fox News Channel
and their motto is fair and balanced and we report you decide.
ABC,NBC,CBS,PBS all are liberal outlets and it is a breath of fresh air to have an alternative.
I do not believe watching stewart etc is news at all.
I know alot of younger people who watch and base their opinions solely on these 2 shows and it is sad.
Between the major networks,most so called newspapers and the talking heads on the radio are all left wing, here in Atlantic Canada anyways they may as well be watching satire and comedy for their info.
Its sad indeed and these young people will be tomorrows leaders.
Sad state of affairs indeed.
Jeff
0
said
0
Jon Stewart was a huge critic of the war in Iraq even when most Americans still accepted the Bush administration's spin. Colbert's satirical parody of Bill O'Reilly exposes his arrogant, ignorant viewpoint on a daily basis. It's amazing that O'Reilly can still show his face on TV...
Republicans, of course, have to dismiss these shows as "liberal bias" even when they turn out to be correct again and again. Things in the States have gotten so bad that the truth is now considered liberal bias. Amazing what lengths conservative people have to go to these days to preserve their illusions about the world. The ice caps aren't melting, the war on drugs is working, the world is only 6,000 years old, the American economy is in great shape, and Sarah Pallin is a good choice of VP because she's a hockey mom.
It must embarrass conservatives to see Stewart and Colbert ridicule them on a regular basis, but that's the purpose of good satire- to hold a mirror up to foolishness and ignorance.