News Sections
U.S. candidates can learn from Canada: Nader
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(34)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. Aug. 8 2008 9:48 AM ET
Ralph Nader is, once again, throwing his hat in the ring for the U.S. presidency, marking the fifth time the 74-year-old has made a run for the White House.
Nader will be in Toronto on Monday to host a campaign fundraiser with Americans living in the country, and to talk about what's at stake for Canada in the U.S. election.
He will also be presenting "An Unreasonable Man", the documentary about himself that appeared in last year's Toronto International Film Festival.
The man who has been dubbed everything from a crusader to a troublemaker and meddler, told CTV's Canada AM he and running mate Matt Gonzalez believe neither Barack Obama nor John McCain will take the United States in the right direction.
"What drives the Nader/Gonzales campaign clearly is the country is in deep trouble," said Nader, who is running as an independent this time around -- his third national campaign and fifth White House bid.
"The giant corporations are tearing the heart and soul out of America in so many ways, the corporate crime wave being the more recent one. And John McCain and Barack Obama are ignoring corporate crime. They want a bigger military budget, they want to stay in Iraq, they want to expand the war in Afghanistan and they're not good on consumer protection at all."
Nader slammed the two-party system in the U.S. as providing too few options for voters and said there is actually little that separates the two main candidates.
"They're using a lot of money in their campaigns from commercial interests and in many ways they're similar," Nader said.
"They're not really for a living wage, they're both opposed to a Canadian-style health care system which gives you free choice of doctor and hospital. How's that for starters?"
There are a number of areas where the U.S. could learn from Canada, Nader said, listing the Canadian system for public financing of elections, a multi-party political system and universal health care as key examples.
"No one dies in Canada because they can't afford health insurance. Everyone has it. But 18,000 Americans die every year according to the National Academy of Scientists, because they can't afford health insurance."
Nader noted that even the Green Party has growing credibility in Canada, suggesting leader Elizabeth May has a good chance of winning a seat in the next election.
Nader returned to a familiar theme for the consumer advocate, restating his long-held opposition to the North America Free Trade Agreement.
He said Canada, Mexico and the U.S. should all withdraw from NAFTA and renegotiate the agreement "so it does not subordinate environmental, consumer and labour rights to the supremacy of commercial power."
According to Nader's website, he already has enough signatures to get on 26 state ballots and he's aiming for 45 by September.
According to an AP/Ipsos poll released on Aug. 5, Nader has three per cent support, while Obama has 47 per cent and McCain holds 41 per cent.
Another poll, however, showed Nader with 10 per cent of the support in Michigan.
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(34)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
jws
said
Wally J
said
You might want to think about what us Americans think about Nader..
It is very unfortunate we do not have a good group of people to choose from in this important election..
Craig
said
Eric G
said
Buba
said
Yuri
said
Dave
said
del
said
Nadar takes support away from the Democrats. I wouldn't be surprised to find the Republicans trying to slip him some money to help finance his run. He may have a left leaning agenda, but he keeps handing the election to the Republicans.
Robin the Hood
said
Then again Nader may simply be on an ego trip by running?!
Thomas C
said
British Student Nader Raider
said
1 end the war AND the occupation in Iraq
(unlike Obama. His website states " a residual force will remain in Iraq and in the region to continue counterterroism missions in Iraq against Al Qaeda" Only Obama's supporters refuse to hear it. He's not even technically ending the fighting)
2 was against war in Afghanistan which is another war Us dragged the NATO nations into, where more afghnan civilians have died than 9/11 and our economy and trops are also paying the price for this war.
Nader in 2002 said:
"Bush burned down a haystack to try to find a couple of needles. He didn't find the needles, but there have been 1000s of innocent deaths." Nader says he would have organized a modest multinational force and sent them into Afghanistan to arrest Osama bin Laden, a kind of police raid. Then he would have tried him at The Hague. "Sept. 11 was an international crime, a massacre," Nader said in 2002. "We should have gone forward with international law."
Compare than to Obama and McCain that want to send 10,000 troops to Afhanistan and thousands more NATO troops
3 Nader says NO war in Pakistan, unlike Obama who made very clear in his speech in Germany he intends on expanding a new war in Pakistan and has pressured our NATO leaders to sign up to it agabist our public opposition
4 Nader says NO war in Iran, despite McCain and Obama making threats of no options being left off the table.
5 Nader will stop committing US taxpayers money to annual funding of Israel's military that is occyping Palestine, to no longer pander to aIPAC. Instead he stands with Jewish Voice For Peace organisation , and the peceful voices in Palestine, not the militants on both sides. He will be trully neutral in the Middle East
6 He would cut military spending crrently taking greater than 50% of gov. spending when US is in serious debt and healthcare, education and infrastructure is underfunded.
Compare that to Obama and McCain that both want further military expansion.
Martin Luther King would said:
"A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death."
Only Nader is following Martin Luther King's policies.
--------
The US media blackout of Ralph Nader is trully sad because he's the type of leader we need in evry country that will focus on social rather than military issues.
The Voice of Reason
said
Buba - Excellent point. That's all I have to say about that.
Ian K
said
The Republicans don't have to slip Nader any cash to weaken the Democrats and let McCain win.
All that's needed is for Hilary Clinton supporters to realize that the best way to get Hilary into the White House in 2012 is to make sure Obama loses in 2008. If he wins in 2008, her hopes are gone forever because he'll probably get a second term.
Of course, Nader's candidacy will help, but the key to electing McCain is make sure Democrat women have a moment of enlightenment about how to give Hilary another chance.
Chris
said
Oh and to bubba: Nice one with the GWB jr comment. You do realize that is actually code for "I don't really have anything worthwhile to say, but I might as well bash Harper, since that's the 'in' thing to do."
bryland
said
If true , where is my own family doctor?
my own hospital choice ? he's gotta be kidding.
Deborah Lynn Douglas
said
G
said
Nader is the only candidate in 5 elections (besides Gore) who actually gives a damn about the people.
Vancouver Girl
said
GP
said
Nader is only trying to raise awareness that the current two party system in the US is corrupt with power and has truly lost its way. It needs to change/evolve or history repeatedly tells us it will collapse in on itself in a very bad way.
Ray - London
said
RRO
said
Frankly both of these candidates represent more of the same in the United States. Obama has switched positions so many times who knows where he is on anything. McCain just doesn't remember what his positions were.
The United States needs to abolish the electoral college which complicates what should be a simple process, they need to make it easier for third and fourth party participation, and hold a national referendum on universal healthcare.
As for those who say Canada is not a two party state. How many parties have held power federally in our history.
Provincially more than one party has held power but that is where it ends.
Andrew S.
said
There's nothing wrong with having more choices of candidates. The Democrats should stop assuming that they deserve your vote just because they call themselves Democrats and are not Republicans.
Real progressives want a choice instead of only having the pro-wiretapping, anti-public financing , pro-war, pro-corporation fraud of a Democrat Obama.
Phillip Smith
said
Max
said
The other party boxes might as well say "None of the above."
Laurel
said
Jake
said
George from Brooklyn
said
We already know that presidential elections in US are 'just for show'. A pointless political public relations ritual, staged by our mainstream corporate mass media and their multinational corporate overlords. Why care about Nader spoiling a stolen election anyway ?
Voting for Obama is for idiots.
There hasn't been a real election here since Ross Perot ran for president and took 30 % of the popular vote. Every vested political interest made sure that it would never happen here again, and it never will. US government is run by traitors and owned by corporate criminals.
Trunkfish
said
DCR-Toronto
said
Give me a break!
Glen S.R. Woytuck
said
Alberta Believer
said
Canadians fed up with socialism and human rights nazis up here have been moving stateside in droves since the last big recession. Kinda like a trade off. The best and brigtest in Canada head south while the slackers, draft doggers and fans of the nanny state in America head north.
Then we'll see which country wins!
Bobby Boucher
said
Al
said
Patricia
said