News Sections
Natynczyk says Afghanistan situation is worsening
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(37)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sun. Jul. 20 2008 9:32 PM ET
Despite the significant gains Canadian troops have achieved in Afghanistan, Gen. Walter Natynczyk admitted Sunday the country's overall situation is worsening.
Canada's top soldier told CTV's Question Period that insurgent attacks have increased year over year, specifically in some parts of the country.
"You have a worsening security situation, especially localized in three areas -- the Kabul area, in the Regional Command East, where the Americans are, and in the south where we are with the British forces and the Dutch," he said.
The statement appeared to backtrack from what Natynczyk said earlier this month after he completed his first visit to Afghanistan as the Chief of Defence Staff.
On a five-day visit to the region, Natynczyk put a positive spin on security issues in the war-torn country, which has seen a resurgence of Taliban activity. Natynczyk, who became the country's top soldier on July 2, had said the increased violence is negligible.
"We're generally along the same lines as we have been the past few years,'' Natynczyk said at a news conference on July 13 at Kandahar Airfield. "Looking at the statistics, we're just a slight notch -- indeed an insignificant notch -- above where we were last year.''
On Sunday, Natynczyk agreed with statistics presented on Question Period that suggested year-to-year violence was up 34 per cent.
"The statistics you cite are absolutely true," he said.
"On the other hand, when I was in Kandahar, from a soldiers' perspective, what they see are localized, fragile signs of success."
He noted the Taliban "is throwing everything against" NATO troops and Afghan security forces in an effort to undermine the government ahead of next year's elections. Natynczyk reiterated the need for more NATO troops to help quell insurgent violence.
"In a counterinsurgency, it is troop intensive. It's not enough just to clear the Taliban out ... you need to have that security blanket to ensure that there is time for police and the army to have that capacity to address their own security," he said.
Natynczyk said that NATO troops have helped the country make significant improvements. He said Canadians have helped train police officers who are respected by the local population, and Afghan battalions have increasingly taken on roles to protect major regions of the country.
User Tools
Related Stories
CTV News
Canada in Afghanistan
The latest news, photos and interactives from Canada's mission in Afghanistan.
Bios and Pictures
Canadian Casualties
We remember those who lost their lives in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.
In Pictures
Hockey night in Kandahar
Hockey night in Kandahar? Soldiers let off steam playing desert ball hockey.
Corrections Canada
Corrections Canada and Canadian Forces reconstruct and train at an infamous Afghan prison.
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(37)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.








Comments are now closed for this story
F from Ottawa
said
Neocon Warmonger
said
Back in the 90s when Desert Storm happened, the civilians were rejoicing and then everyone just pulled out, leaving the civilians who had supported the forces to twist in the wind at the hand of a dictator. I would hate to see that happen again...
G.J.M. CALGARY
said
Mo
said
Mark
said
When this mission fails, it will be due to the failure of Nato and political worries of those who stayed behind-all due to a fear of inciting Muslim anger at home. Fundamentalist Islamist terrorists who do not hesitate to use suicide as a modern weapon against a weakened West will likely win the day.
How pathetic we have become.
Dan Dan
said
Max
said
However, the battle here is against more than just the Taliban. Any broader enemy so entrenched, so determined, and so resolute can be expected to fight hardest when its days begin to look numbered.
Furthermore, those we battle are completely cognizant of the fact that there is dissention here, in the U.S., and in other allied nations. They know that if they can drag this out long enough, their enemy may well succumb to its own internal political pressures and withdraw.
Well, we either stand for a "cause" and believe in what we're doing there or we retreat back to our own safe bastion of freedom and turn our back on those who don't have freedom and safety to enjoy.
Are we trying to make one part of the world a better, safer place? Yes.
Forget the U.S., George Bush, oil, etc. What does Canada stand for?! Are we committed to battling forces that routinely conspire to harm us on our own soil? I hope so.
Thanks to all our brave men and women in Afghanistan, Iraq (yes), and elsewhere.
Serviceman
said
- Our new CDS may have brought to light a new view on the situation in Afghanistan, but to call him out on pulling out would mean the deaths of our commrades would mean nothing. We need and will finish the course of this mission and we will be successful. But hey, our fore-fathers deaths in the previous wars have allowed you the freedom of speech that you enjoy today. Our soldiers of today are ensuring these rights for the future!!
bill
said
After hearing the lies and distortions for the last 2 years from the Harper Government and the former Canadian military head about how well Canada is doing in this god forsaken situation, it is heartening to hear some truth.
Afghanistan has never been conquered by foreign troops and it won't be conquered by foreign troops this time either.
It is time to wrap up this terrible situation for Canada before it worsens and brings Al Quaeda suicide bombers or worse to our own shores.
Doug BC
said
It is expensive now because of 40 years of neglect.There is a lot of catching up to bring our military into the 21st century.For a long time,Canada has been a freeloader on the world stage.We cannot expect other NATO countries to do all the dirty work for us,or we become the same as those NATO countries who are not doing their share in Afghanistan.
And,while I agree there is always room to spend the money in our own country,it's hard to deny there are others deserving of the liberties and freedoms we so aften take for granted.To refuse to help out where we can because we have other uses for the money,is simply immoral,self centred,and makes us all seem very greedy.
I wonder who would then be willing to help us in our hour of need,or why the should.
Carol in NB
said
Allan Eizinas
said
Another NATO “victory” and another 60 Afghanistan family members joining the Taliban in order to avenge the deaths of their innocent sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, sisters and brothers.
The Taliban Hydra grows.
Madness!
Mario - Rockland
said
Kim
said
All we do is drive around and wait for them to attack us.
Rene
said
That being said, I firmly believe that we as a nation must choose what we want to stand for. I believe that Canada has always stood on the side of certain basic freedoms, even though as a nation we tend to abrogate those freedoms at home at times. However, let's not be so naive as to think that to achieve the freedoms we so cherish, we can do so in isolation from the rest of the world. And that is the main lesson to take back from WW2. Not that might will succeed, but rather that no man is an island unto him/herself.
If we as a nation accept our own freedoms, then we must by the very nature of who we are and what we stand for, accept that all humans are entitled to those same freedoms. Yes George W. Bush made the decision to go into Afghanistan and dragged the rest of the world into the conflict and the debate. But now that we are there, let's not do what the Americans and the Russians have done on previous occasions. Let's not leave the battlefield with a job half done. Otherwise as some previous posters have said, of what value is the sacrifice that we as a nation have made. Let's not politicize that sacrifice and change our directions strictly for the benefit of satisfaction of political belief. Let's all stand up as one, united as a nation, lead by our politicians, whether we agree with them or not (for we did vote them in) and finish what we have started.
As I said at the beginning of this post, I don't believe in war, conflict or bullying as a means to achieve an end, but I do believe in finishing what we started.
Em
said
SB
said
However, getting to know a young woman from Afghanistan and the horrors she and her family experienced; I changed my thinking completely and now support NATO defeating the Taliban. Notice I said NATO. We need the full support of other NATO countries who are not helping in order to restore order to this country!!
Peter Seville
said
New Alliance
said
j from ontario
said
Neilpk
said
Why is recruitment down?
said
Why is this? Can someone please explain how this concept works?
b.c. CHRIS
said
Considering the fact that the taleban was created by Pakistan and they continue to find sanctuary there nato will never win until Pakistan is neutralized
proud conservative
said
Gary
said
MHB
said
SRG
said
Canada
32 mil - 2500 soldiers
USA
350 mil - 25000 soldiers
When you look at our populations, it seems to me that the US needs to step up their troop commitment.
Lillian
said
CFSupporter
said
In Canada, our entire military, from the
Generals and Admirals to the finance clerks is about 65K!
We are having a difficult time sustaining a force of 2,500 in Afghanistan as it is.
Many other NATO counties won't even engage in combat missions. They won't send more soldiers.
So Mario, hurry on down to the recruiting centre in downtown Ottawa and sign up for the army. Tell them to send you over to Afghanistan ASAP!!
Good luck buddy
Jim McB
said
A couple of years ago tha ANA could not put a batallion in the field and now they are conducting operations with five. That to me would seem to be a significant increase in their abillity to tend to their own securitiy and to conduct command and control. The ANA is also taking significant loses that might have been NATO troops at another time. The General's words on the success of the mentoring program by Canadian troops were also missed in the report. I wonder why?
ryan
said
Andy
said
This would be happening in Afghanistan about two minutes after we leave. That is why we are there. That is why we cannot leave.
GRIM
said
NATO is not in Afghanistan to conqueor the country. NATO and its member nations could not conceivably want Afghanistan as part of a greater empire. NATO is there to establish the rule of law and democracy while rooting out terrorists and repressive elements.
Kevin L
said
Get your stats right
said
To "J from Ontario"
Canada
32 mil - 2500 soldiers
USA
350 mil - 25000 soldiers
When you look at our populations, it seems to me that the US needs to step up their troop commitment.
Be careful of the stats you use. According to the CIA World Fact Book, the US population is estimated to be 303,824,646 as of July 2008. The same ref has the Canadian population as 33,212,696, also as of July 08.
Applying your argument to the real numbers means the US would be on par with Canada if they had 22870 troops deployed. Wait for it, the US is likely to soon have more troops in southern Afghanistan that the Brits, Dutch and Canada combined. Like another poster said, when you get down to the crunch, there are really only four nations the world can count on, Australia, Canada, the UK and the US. And of them, as always, it is the US that is willing to give the most so others in the world will be even just a little bit better off.
Several weeks ago a woman complained that Canada should be able to do more for its citizens around the world like the UK. Of course I doubt she realises that the British regular Army alone is approx 100,000. Compared to Canada with a regular Army of less that 25,000. That is four times the size from a population of less than twice.
SRG, I would suggest that if any of the Anglo nations needs to pull its socks up, it is Canada.
bobby
said
"Canada
32 mil - 2500 soldiers
USA
350 mil - 25000 soldiers
When you look at our populations, it seems to me that the US needs to step up their troop commitment."
You need a refresher course in math!
Canada's population: 33 million
US: 330 million
CF Supporter
said
We have no real complaint giving pro athletes tens of millions of dollars per year to play games.
Mind you, they are rough and tough games. Well some of them are.
However, for the young Canadians who play the real game, where death is very likely, we pay them $40K to $50K per year. That is a decent wage.
I guess it is more important to skate around and spit and to act like a free agent than to put your life on the line for people who desperately need our help to free them from the Taliban's opressive policies.
Canadians really like the notion that the world views us as a caring nation. Well we like to talk about it and pat ourselves on the back. But we can barlely meet our recruiting objectives.
In terms of recruiting, we are barley covering the number of retirements from the military each year.
The net gain is really marginal.
Not too many pro athletes signing up to wear our flag where it counts, eh?
Don't pull a groin fellas!!