News Sections
Dating service that bans ugliness comes to Canada
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(117)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Jun. 24 2008 10:50 PM ET
An exclusive online dating service that attempts to weed out unattractive members, allowing only the beautiful through the door, is coming to Canada.
Prospective members of the BeautifulPeople Network submit a picture and profile, and other members of the opposite sex rate the applicant over a 72-hour period, deciding whether they're worthy of joining the coveted community.
The online service even goes so far as to advertise a ban on ugliness -- something the managing director says is more a reflection of reality than evidence of arrogance.
"If you're in a bar in a romantic situation and you're going to approach someone with a romantic inclination, you're going to approach someone you're attracted to, at least initially," Greg Hodge tells Canada AM. "There's certainly nothing shallow about that, it's human nature."
Hodge says he isn't trying to define beauty. Instead, he said the organizers believe in the old maxim 'beauty is in the eye of the beholder' and as such they give the power to the people -- other approved members -- to decide who is allowed in.
Including Canada, the dating service now operates in 16 countries, and Hodge attributes the success to a simple formula.
"It plays on a clever combination of four things: beauty, love, sex and money. Advertisers use those four desires to sell us pretty much everything and Beautiful People plays on a clever combination of all of that," Hodge said.
Not everyone thinks the concept is so clever. Lisa Naylor counsels teens with body image issues and says the website is a step in the wrong direction.
"I think the message that it gives girls -- boys and girls, but particularly girls -- in the culture about appearance is quite damaging," Naylor told CTV News.
Jacqueline Levitin is a Simon Fraser University professor who teaches how women are portrayed in popular culture. She says the site is evidence that the feminist movement still has a long way to go.
"I don't think things have changed all that much," Levitin told CTV News. "I think we've done a lot of back-sliding."
Hodge admits the dating service usually provokes some negative reactions whenever it opens in a new market and he jokes he could soon need his own security detail.
But the bottom line, Hodge says, is that the online service simply makes it easier for people -- provided they pass the attractive test -- to meet that special someone.
"People want to be with someone they're attracted to, that was the initial premise of the creation of Beautiful People, remove that first hurdle," Hodge said.
"And once you do become a member of this coveted community, you have essentially the best little black book in the world."
With a report by CTV's Rob Brown in Vancouver
User Tools
Related Websites
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(117)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Jennifer
0
said
0
Gloria
0
said
0
Tim
0
said
0
Sandra from Montreal
0
said
0
Shame Shame
TG
0
said
0
Dave
0
said
0
peggy
0
said
0
DK
0
said
0
Kelly
0
said
0
Quasimodo
0
said
0
Wayne
0
said
0
The problem with Beautiful People is that a lot of them really think...You Know What doesn't stink.
MHR
0
said
0
Joseph
0
said
0
Realty Cheque!
0
said
0
Goes to show that so-called developed countries favour Narcissism and Consumerism in the 21st century while the rest of the world can barely feed itself.
Paul
0
said
0
Joanne from Barrie
0
said
0
i WOULD LOVE TO MEET ONE OF THESE PEOPLE ....NOT!
M. Cameron
0
said
0
Narcissus
0
said
0
Dana
0
said
0
Ken
0
said
0
You know what they say? "Beauty is skin deep but ugly is all the way to the bone.
Victor Panlilio
0
said
0
Miss Misery
0
said
0
Tricia
0
said
0
...and Dave, great comment. LOL!
rod
0
said
0
D.S.
0
said
0
Edward
0
said
0
TG
0
said
0
Could we have a dating website that bans stupid people?
Now Dave is my kinda guy.
We need a web site for smart people which bans the brainless, particularly anyone who's registered on the "beautiful people" web site ;-)
Coddy
0
said
0
rachel
0
said
0
Sandy
0
said
0
Keith Summers
0
said
0
Peter
0
said
0
Kathleen
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
Rob
0
said
0
Peter
0
said
0
PTOL
0
said
0
And HMR - what the heck does you being gay have to do with this issue?
kate
0
said
0
NA
0
said
0
Zand
0
said
0
That's some seriously lonely beautiful people!
Which is rather funny really, I mean, the first "profile" I saw was of some 20-something who owns a villa, owns a car, and makes a substantial amount of money.
I mean, the depth there! How can this man with perfectly chiseled abs, strong jaw, oozing raw masculinity be single?!
Oh that's right. This isn't a site looking for the perfect complimentary eye candy, this is a site looking for depth, love and a lasting relationship.
Uh huh.
Bill L A
0
said
0
Never met a woman that wasnt beautiful
0
said
0
Since Ive matured (somewhat) Ive learned that there are no ugly people. Ive realized that every woman Ive ever met has been beautiful in one way or many others.
Darryl
0
said
0
Thanks to the dating service I've eliminated their clientèle as possible suitors (I'm single). Can't believe how shallow and insecure these people are!
don
0
said
0
Ali
0
said
0
Mathieu
0
said
0
Judson
0
said
0
Sanjay Singh
0
said
0
But I do wonder how long it will be before someone launches a lawsuit against the website for not being admitted claiming mental anguish and stuff like that.
In North America people will try anything to get what they cannot have.
ks
0
said
0
Inversity
0
said
0
It's like the bumper sticker: "Don't tell me what type of day to have!" In other words, don't tell me what type of person to date! I'll be the one (not others) to decide if a person is beautiful or not! Hodge and his approved members cannot pretend to be God, when it comes to beauty.
Sarah
0
said
0
KG
0
said
0
Devil's Advocate
0
said
0
The "accepted members" are just so damned "beautiful" that they need to resort to finding someone online.
Too funny!
And a pathetic premise to launch an online dating profile.
TC
0
said
0
Dana Sixty
0
said
0
I beg to differ on why some of these folks are even on here, even if only just from a superficial, "looks" perspective. And IQ is obviously not a factor.
I clicked on one guy because he looked like the type to slip a drug into your drink. He lists his profession as a "giornalist" and he weighs 5kg...
Acroyear
0
said
0
I'm an ugly dude... no way around it. My lady? Well, she isn't ugly to my eyes, but I'd say by THESE peoples standards they'd say so.
And we've been head over heals happy with each other for 3 years now.
You know what attracted me to her? The very first thing that made me want to say hello? Her laugh :)
God only knows what she saw in me... wasn't even my money, didn't have any then...LOL.
But we two ugly butts are very happy, thank you very much. You want to be shallow enough to think that looks at all reflect the person inside? Be my guest.
BTW...if they're so damn good looking, why the hell do they need a dating service? If they're "all that and a bag of chips" shouldn't they be beating off us ugly loosers with a stick?
Having said all that, they want to meet folks just as shallow as themselves, and pay for the priviledge... more power too them.
Free country and all that... even for fools out to get themselves hurt.
HEALS
0
said
0
Mike K.
0
said
0
Scott Hodgins
0
said
0
BeautifulPeople.com, a place for narcissistic elitism.
Chris
0
said
0
Pretty Girl
0
said
0
Pam
0
said
0
Labrador Tea
0
said
0
Or like any real estate agent or politician does, you use your best picture from 15 years ago.
Ridiculous concept in all regards. As a friend of mine once said: "what is considered beauty is really just average". Personally I find the "before" pictures on make overs are usually more attractive to my eye.
I think it is because that is the way I see character in who they really are, not some average common denominator.
Rocket
0
said
0
So much for compatibility. "Sorry...I can't date you. You're a perfect match in every way except you have dry, fine hair and one foot is bigger than the other." What's next? A dating site based on income? How about based on eye color? Give me a break!
I met my wife the old fashioned way...in person, at a grocery store. She is what you would consider average looking, like me, but we are a perfect macth for each other. I hope this site fails, and fails miserably like all of the superficial, pretentious people it attracts.
TES
0
said
0
"OMG, UR HOT!"
"LOL! U R HOT 2!"
Let the vapid and beautiful go to it. Maybe they'll find the people they deserve.
Seven
0
said
0
Ivy
0
said
0
Beer Goggles
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
Joanne
0
said
0
IT Manager in Calgary
0
said
0
If you don't like this site's policies, DON'T GO THERE. Wow, was that ever easy!
pp
0
said
0
There is a reason why thy need their own dating service...
It has been my experience that 'beautiful people' are the most stupid, vain, rude, uncompassionate people around.
The guys that I have dated who were 'So Fine' were in actual fact idiots - they couldn't change a tire if their life depended on it, they had no conversation skills, they were lazy beyond compare....
Now I am not ugly by any means (rather nice looking I've been told) but I can tell you - I see a man is older and not perfect and I would rather associate with less than perfect people than those that think they were 'gods greatest gift to humanity'. I want a man who is a real man - not some sissy who is afraid to get his hands dirty - I want a man who can work in the barn, build things, fix things not some fuss-pot who is afraid he 'might get blisters'. hahaha yep had one of those - shallow...
Beauty is in a smile and a kind guesture not manicured nails and perfect bodies and hairdos....
bobby
0
said
0
I had a beautiful sister. Everyone noticed her good looks. Not me. She was a first-class jerk with no empathy for others. One gets used to beauty after a while and no longer is enthralled by it. What remains - good character - takes over if a relationship is to last.
Dave
0
said
0
pp
0
said
0
You know:
IBM has posters at work stating 'Ladies - They may be geeks - BUT they are geeks with golden futures...' - Beauty is internal not external.
Lauren
0
said
0
Ray
0
said
0
Paris H.
0
said
0
pp
0
said
0
That is why I don't go to bars - looser zone. The best place the meet people is by becoming active in your community, travelling, taking night courses, etc GET A LIFE... you meet REAL people in these places and you know their personality right off the bat....
Nick J Boragina
0
said
0
Pretty Man seeking Not-So Pretty Woman
0
said
0
Please tell me I'm pretty.. I feed off fawning. I need praise.. and I can't possibly date another pretty person for fear that she might think I was less pretty than her..
This stupid website will never help me. I need an ugly person to think I'm much prettier than them to have a working relationship. That way neither of us will feel bad when I dump her for a slightly prettier woman.
ROFL! This website couldn't possibly promote meaningful relationships, nobody has a bathroom big enough for the products of two pretty people! Brangelina probably have walk-in closets for their cosmetics alone!
Tina
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
Evan in Athabasca
0
said
0
ARJAY
0
said
0
In any case, although this site definitely caters to the narcissistic, it only replicates electronically what happens anyway. Those of you who don't believe that looks are important are living in a sentimental fantasy. Research has shown ("It's Beauty before Brain, Psychological tests show" Ellen Bernstein, Psychcology Today) that looks are extremely important for both men and women. Both genders respond more to good looking people than ugly ones. Good looking people are more likely to be hired, and are often imbuded with positive personality traits that they don't really possess. We assume they have these traits because they are good looking, then fool ourselves into belieing that these traits are why we like them.
And yes, there are fairly universal standards of beauty. Both males and females respond to certain facial characteristics and body types because of evolutionary pressures. This holds across cultures, by the way. The sexist gender difference is that men are more willing to admit that they like hot women, while women often claim- and even believe themselves- that it's "personality" that matters. Not according to the studies. Women are just as likely to prefer good looking men over less atractive ones as men are to prefer good looking women. The only difference is that weomen are more likely to want wealth as well, again for evolutionary pressures. Women just lie about it more, even to themselves, to preserve their egos.
And before you post saying that you didn't choose your husband because of his looks or his money, you should realize that these studies don't mean that every person always does this, only that there is a general tendancy to behave this way. You probably believe that you chose your husband (or wife) because of character or loooks. But in general, that's not true. Women will put up with a lot more crap (and so will men) from a good looking partner than they would a less attractive one. We lie to ourselves all the time, because the truth would be too painful to accept.
Donna Thompson
0
said
0
Glen
0
said
0
SG
0
said
0
Donna Thompson
0
said
0
I wouldn't lower myself to become involved with such shallowness.
Tara
0
said
0
Beautiful Person
0
said
0
People who are not beautiful simply would not understand.
Many beautiful people are actually quite modest.
DNA programs them to seek others with similar qualities.
Gotta love free enterprise.
bill from Montreal
0
said
0
Jim
0
said
0
If thats shallow so be it. The rest of you can keep the ugly ones.
Susanne
0
said
0
Carolina
0
said
0
This site has a lot of both. They all deserve each other.
emj
0
said
0
However, we tend to be generally attracted to people who look more like ourselves, which means that while there are global standards of beauty (small nose, high cheekbones, symmetry, large eyes, etc.), at the end of the day we are attracted to people who have a similar level of physical attractiveness to ourselves. This has an evolutionary advantage, because we are more likely to successfully procreate with someone who is attainable. This is why you see people with partners who are similarly attractive. The one exception is of course when wealth comes into play - you know, when you see a beautiful woman with an unattractive man, and automatically assume that he must have money. We haven't evolved all that much from our ancestors.
While I agree that the site is shallow, this is far from being the first one (ever been to hotornot.com? or the "millionaire" dating websites?), and it is up to the consumer to choose where they shop. You're probably not going to find a lasting relationship on this site - try eharmony or lavalife for that.
Dee
0
said
0
I am AVERAGE, as are 99.9% of us in the human family, INCLUDING the very orange Mr. Hodge.
BUT... I find it worrisome that most of the folks on the site are of European decent, with a handful of people, like me, of African decent... But they look like Eurpeanised (is that a word??) Africans... Does that mean I'm ugly 'cause I'm not of European descent? Hahahaha! Please, no one answer that, I'm JUST KIDDING!!
Oh, and this reminds me of the something-or-other Madison people that advocated adultery... Hmmm... Where are they now???
Denise
0
said
0
Sal
0
said
0
Then you will be left for someone more "prefect" - in your "ugliness".
Sad!
FB
0
said
0
This website is taking a lot of heat for using the word "beautiful", but really they are letting the public choose who gets on the site, so it is the publics/users idea of beauty. They are not forcing their idea of beautiful on the public. It's just a word. As more and more people join and the perception of beauty broadens with each new member this site will just become another dating site with the word beautiful in the name.
Anyway this site is far less evil than other dating sites that are out there like those set up to arrange extra-marital affairs.
Kev of Dundas
0
said
0
The reason we are *offended* ?
Because we see that this is how we operate.
To admit it is to show our ugly side, and that's offensive.
Nick J Boragina
0
said
0
All those shallow people you meet on regular dating sites will be attracted here instead, where they can bumble though meaningless relationship after meaningless relationship, while leaving the real world (and chances at, oh I dunno, marriage to someone you actually care for?) to the rest of us adults.
Shannon, Vancouver
0
said
0
Roger T
0
said
0
Only makes sense that you're with someone you have an attraction to rather than those pre-arrange marriages or suppose to people in certian cultures who you can't even see the woman's face because of their clothings they are forced to wear.
Different strokes for different folks.
Alberta Believer
0
said
0
Competition, elimination, qualifying, merit, earning defeating, victory, winners, losers. Meet the new "swear words" in our politically correct feel-good society that is being pretty much led by the Human Rights Tribunals and enforced in the nation's public schools.
Why do beautifull people need a dating site? Because like most minorities they sometimes have trouble meeting up with similarly disposed persons.
But here in Canada any deeemd "successful minority of persons does't quite jerk the tears the same way as the groups with actual sob stories!
Carrie
0
said
0
There's no black and white here. Everyone has beautiful things about them and ugly things about them - and they're not all physical. Which is precisely why this dating site comes across as a cash-grabbing bit of idiocy. Let the people who want to join give it a go, while the rest of us can keep going along our merry ways, enjoying beauty wherever we happen to find it.
Anastasia
0
said
0
Alberta Believer
0
said
0
Newsflash Kieth, there are already dating sites for blacks, Jews and other minroties. Oh and with the conventional sites, I can as a racist white guy simply seek out only the white women and chatr with them until I find one of a similar mindset.
So yes Adolf can potentially met Eva on any dating site out there, which is one area where the Human Rights Commissions and the PC Police can't guard against.
PS. You shouldda seen this heated debate we had on minorities in Canada on PlentyOFish last month!)
Melissa
0
said
0
Perhaps that tells you something right there about the personalities of these people.
You can't define beauty, to each their own. There are people who find Angelina Jolie attractive and some who don't.
It's sad that they need a dating website and even sadder that the average person can't handle them in real life...
I've personally viewed this website, and I'd have to say, the people that make it, aren't as "beautiful" as they think they are.
Leonardo Bustamie
0
said
0
It is more of a business. I bet this site will have high membership fees than other sites...
Abdul
0
said
0
Citing the article by Ellen Bernstein in Psychology Today really requires that you should have read more than the abstract.
Acknowledging that we are attracted to beauty that we apply characteristics not associated to the person is the gist of the article not any sort of defence of errant behaviour.
This website encourages even by Ms Bernstein's standards negative social behaviour.
Contrary to this article you may want to Read Jeff Howe's article "A Reason to Smile
Beautiful people with ugly personalities—are not so pretty." Psychology Today Magazine, Mar/Apr 1999
BTW it's Psychology not Psychcology.
Mickey
0
said
0
Laura Langstaff
0
said
0
Northern Pike
0
said
0
bren
0
said
0
Krista
0
said
0
Shawn
0
said
0