Canada -
News Sections
Submarine repairs costing Canadians millions
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(17)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. Jun. 6 2008 10:39 AM ET
It's been 10 years since Jean Chretien's Liberal government doled out $900 million to the British in return for four used diesel powered submarines -- today only one is operational, the others dry-docked and will cost taxpayers millions in repairs.
Rob Huebert, associate director at the Centre for Military and Strategic Studies, says the vessels are vital to Canadian sovereignty and in desperate need of maintenance.
According the Huebert, the fleet's current state of disrepair can be attributed to inactivity. He compares the submarines to a car left outside for years without being driven.
"They stayed in water way too long," Huebert told Canada AM on Thursday from Calgary.
Huebert says the British government was intent on selling six submarines to Canada, but the transaction took three years, and in the end only four were bought.
Former Liberal defense minister, David Collenette, has said the delay was due to fear of political backlash.
"Chretien had always been a strong supporter of the submarine proposal, but he worried about the timing of an announcement when so many sectors of Canadian society had borne the brunt of deficit cutting," Collenette told the House of Commons defence committee in 2004.
Eventually, Canada purchased the HMCS Chicoutimi, Corner Brook, Victoria and Windsor -- but they've been plagued with problems.
On its maiden voyage in 2004, fire aboard the HMCS Chicoutimi killed Lieut. Chris Saunders and injured eight others. It is expected to be out of commission until 2012, two years after its initial re-launch date.
Only the HMCS Corner Brook is believed to be cruising the ocean, and the Victoria needs $195 million in repairs if it is expected to be on duty in 2009.
The HMCS Windsor is also undergoing repairs.
"Submarines are incredibility difficult technologies to run," Huebert said, pointing to Russia's beleaguered fleet and an explosion aboard a U.K. vessel off the coast of Alaska in 2007.
"Unfortunately, the technology is not only valid, it is necessary," he added. Huebert cites the Asia-Pacific region as an example the "huge growth" in submarine procurement.
Japan has 14 subs, while China, South Korea and Taiwan are all expanding their fleet.
Once they are operational, the submarines are some of the best, according to Huebert. Diesel-powered subs are slower than nuclear powered vessels but are also harder to detect under water.
Huebert says it's difficult to convince Canadians that submarine capabilities are important to the country's sovereignty. In the Arctic, the mere presence of a Canadian sub means other countries must inform our government of their whereabouts.
"The submarines are very important for underwater surveillance in Canadian waters, particularly in near-ice conditions for our North," he said.
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(17)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
The Widowmaker
said
Jeff
said
It's time for the Canadians to build the military, because after the US has finally been exploited for all its worth, (all thats left is for their dollar to finish imploding) the rest of the world will be looking to take what we have. We have the open spaces, and of course the natural resources the world of the future will desperately be seeking. Its time to get tough, and that means the social sissies that will say otherwise.
Bill
said
Ian Yellowknife
said
Dean
said
Mark M
said
Vanessa C
said
We should be forcing the UK to pay for this. They bloody well knew the state of these things!
I fear for the lives of our sailors in these. Isn't it bad enough that naval aviators still have the widow making Sea King this long?
Left in a state of disrepair
said
Dennis
said
Maybe it would have been better in the long run. I dunno.
GaryB
said
DJ
said
cars,they should have bit the bullet and bought 2 new subs.I would not be suprised if they have sails and a mast stowed on board the only sub that is operational.With the amount of coast line in CANADA they probably should have been nuclear subs.
Tim from Calgary
said
David
said
He is in the running for most ineffective, spineless leader this country ever had.
C&W
said
Evan in Athabasca
said
I agree that the British Government should help pay for repairs since we lost a man on a maiden voyage. As for the sea king, it is a very robust helicopter, but they need to be replaced when the service life has been reached. The current fleet of sea kings have reached the end of their useful life. Shortly after the CF-18 hornets will have to be replaced. They were due to be replaced by the New F-22 Raptor, but the Chrietien?? government pulled out of that program a few short months before the maiden flight.....such a sad choice since we need a new dual engine jet to replace the Hornets.
Just my thoughts on the liberal fumbles....
DJ in Manitoba
said
Bob in Halifax
said