Politics -
News Sections
PM spokesperson backtracks on Afghanistan briefing
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(34)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. May. 29 2008 10:49 PM ET
A spokesperson for Prime Minister Stephen Harper was forced to backtrack Thursday after inaccurately informing reporters that Italy was removing restrictions on the use of their soldiers in Afghanistan.
CTV's Roger Smith said the gaffe occurred just before the prime minister's plane was to leave Rome for London on the final stretch of Harper's European tour.
"The prime minister's press secretary, Carolyn Stewart Olsen, came back and told us that after having dinner with Stephen Harper last night Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi had just issued a statement saying Italy would remove the caveat that restricts what their soldiers can do in Afghanistan," said Smith.
Canada has been pressing for some time to get other countries involved in the Afghanistan mission to remove restrictions on soldiers so that they can help out more in combat operations, said Smith.
After hearing the developments, journalists reported the breaking news.
But then, after the plane departed, Stewart alerted reporters that she had got it wrong.
She said there was a wire story saying that Berlusconi was reconsidering the caveats but he hadn't made any decisions.
"The prime minister's staff was so anxious to have the story corrected that they allowed us to go up to the front of the plane and use the prime minister's secured satellite phone to call our news desks," said Smith.
"It seems the prime minister's staff was just in some unseemly haste to claim some sort of diplomatic triumph that they rushed out this news without checking the facts and it's a big embarrassment."
Harper in London
Harper was in London Thursday where, in a speech to the Canada-United Kingdom Chamber of Commerce, he said environmental targets must be balanced with economic growth.
But he added that economic growth cannot be sustained without better environmental conservation.
"But it is equally true as the current reaction to high energy prices in Europe is starting to show, that environmental progress will never be achieved unless the economic needs of the population are being met," said Harper.
"So our targets need to realistic, practical and achievable.''
Harper also said that countries like India and China must face the same targets to reduce greenhouse gases as Western nations. Otherwise, he said, the U.S. would stay out of future deals to cut emissions.
The United Nations and the European Union, along with various environmental groups, have denounced Ottawa's environmental plan.
Harper also met with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the Queen.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(34)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
GasStation
said
John from Fredericton
said
FBE
said
Josh in Ontario
said
Phil
said
This was info from the PM's press secretary. How is it a media gaffe? This info didn't require verification. There would be no damage to the media for incorrect info, it's coming from a senior aide or the PM himself. The Bernier story has them spooked and they're looking for a good news story to blunt the impact.
Pete Colbourne
said
André
said
Matt from Montreal
said
Mike in Kandahar
said
World leaders: watch what you say to Harper, and watch what documents you give his ministers.
MTA
said
Doug
said
If the people that the PM has empowered to talk to the press speak then we have to assume that the PM is speaking. Right or wrong its news and it should be reported as news. If it is found to be incorrect then retract the statement. Once again its just another situation the government has messed up.
Don't blame the press, we live in a time where news is reported by the second not the day.
Isabella
said
Marg Bedore
said
Bill
said
steve
said
Rudy B
said
Sylvain
said
Jonathan
said
Berlusconi probaby indicated that he is going to do it and likely told Harper so over dinner, and then Berlusconi had to backtrack to ensure that he follows the proper steps...thus the retraction.
Phil
said
"Wake up People"
Dan from Toronto
said
Firstly, it's not big news one way or the other.
Secondly, Harper deserves anything the media throws at him given his relationship with reporters and his "anything but open and transparent" government.
Chris
said
Dan from Toronto
said
By the way, if Berlusconi is just being polite. He is going to change Italy's role in Afganistan.
ET
said
Abdul
said
I however do agree that this was a bit frivolous to publish. So what the problem was solved. We should be more concerned that Bernier left classified documents in his exGirlfriends place, not the fact the press secretary is messed up.
It is more important to note that this is the worst government Canada has ever had based on policy not typos and verbal gaffes.
Mike in Kandahar
said
Whether what was alleged to have been said was a fact or not, the fact that an official said it was, is newsworthy. "The PM's press secretary has announced that..."
Richard
said
Next week, "How To Press The Panic Button" and "101 Ways The Sky Is Falling" by the uninformed public.
Non Issue. NEXT!
Alana
said
Dale Wilson
said
glenn
said
Under that brilliant nugget of wisdom what would be the point of a news conference. After all, if Steven Harper said something on a podium in front of live cameras under this logic he wouldn't be responsible because we would all have to wait for the WILD AND CRAZY media to spend the next several days going around and confirming it.
Plain and simple this is a small error compounded by a bigger problem with Canada's handling of foreign affairs and was a gaffe by the government.
On the flip side, it is equally unjust that most other nations are not providing their share of support for this UN mission. It is frustrating to see our men and women giving up their lives while other UN member nations simply look on. If this puts some inadvertant extra pressure on them to step up then at least there is a silver lining.
Bernadette
said
But if there's an election, I would still choose Harper over Stephane Dion. I don't think Stephane Dion will lead the country well, because he's weak, has no charisma. I never liked him since the beginning.
david
said
Joseph in Edmonton
said
Rosebud in BC
said
reality man
said
"If the media are getting a free trip over to Europe, why don't they report on the important stuff?"
a) The whole point of a press release is to have the media report it. If this wasn't "important stuff" then why did Harper's staff fall over itself, without checking its facts, to rush this to reporters? Because THEy thought it was big stuff and getting your facts wrong about big stuff that concerns other countries is also big stuff.
b) Some people just never learn. Bernier called for the governor of Khandahar to be deposed, which the government of Afghanistan was already planning but hadn't revealed yet, and once Bernier flapped his lips the government of Afghanistan was forced to back down to make it look like its policy wasn't being dictated by a foreign power. This is the exact same situation with Italy moving troops into combat. You don't think that Italy supplying combat troops in Afghanistan is important? How about Berlusconi backing down on this decision because he doesn't want it to look like Italy's foreign and military policy is being dictated by some moron from Calgary who can't even keep classified documents out of the hands of biker chicks?
c) The government of Canada has just misrepresented the foreign policy of Italy. How would YOU react if Berlusconi came out and claimed that Harper told him that Canada felt that the mission in Afghanistan was a waste of time, when he had never said such a thing, just because Berlusconi may think that and wants the mission to end. How about if he came out and claimed that Harper had told him that following the Kyoto targets is the best approach to climate change, when Harper said no such thing, and Berlusconi was just trying to get Harper to move towards Italy's position on Kyoto?