News Sections
Green leader blasts NDP on carbon tax stance
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(44)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sun. May. 25 2008 9:49 PM ET
NDP Leader Jack Layton's opposition to a carbon tax shows he's more interested in hurting the Liberals than helping the environment, says Green Party Leader Elizabeth May.
"We need to act on the climate crisis, and a carbon tax is a litmus test of whether a party is serious about it or not," May told CTV's Question Period on Sunday.
Layton's opposition to a carbon tax "is not part of the global social democratic approach," she said, adding his political rivalry with the Liberals may be driving policy.
The Green Party also advocates a carbon tax. The Liberals will soon unveil a proposal that would shift taxes off income and onto carbon, with the overall tax burden remaining unchanged. By putting a price on carbon, people will theoretically use less, thus helping reduce the greenhouse gas emissions that are driving climate change.
Layton has taken some blows from environmentalists for his party's stance, including David Suzuki, perhaps the most prominent environmentalist in Canada.
"I'm really shocked with the NDP with this. I thought that they had a very progressive environmental outlook," Suzuki told Question Period on May 18.
Layton told Question Period that his party supports the pricing of carbon and that his party's policies are in line with many of those promoted by the David Suzuki Foundation.
The solution promoted by Layton involves "cap and trade" -- putting a strict limit on greenhouse gas emissions by what he called the "big polluters." Those polluters would pay if they exceed, and the revenues would be directed by the government to climate-friendly initiatives, he said.
"Things like helping weatherize homes right across the country, creating thousands and thousands of jobs for Canadians and reducing their bills and greenhouse gas emissions," he said.
The NDP would see more green cars built in Canada and invest in public transit and renewable energy, Layton said.
A cap-and-trade system would move more quickly than a carbon tax. Big oil and gas supports a carbon tax, while U.S. Democrat Barack Obama supports cap-and-trade, he said.
But environmentalist Stephen Hazell of the Sierra Club has said cap-and-trade systems take a long time to develop.
Tories oppose carbon tax
Conservative Environment Minister John Baird told Question Period on May 18 that his government will "force the big polluters, big corporate polluters" to pay for their emissions.
"(Liberal Leader Stephane) Dion wants to give some sort of unlimited licence to pollute and just simply allow big business to buy their way out of this problem," he said.
Layton said his party's policies were nothing like those of the Harper government. Prime Minister Stephen Harper "has his head stuck in the tar sands," he said.
May called cap-and-trade a "right-wing, free-market approach" -- although she conceded her party supported it on a sectoral basis.
Some have said a carbon tax could drive up home heating costs and adversely affect those least able to bear the additional cost.
Properly implemented, a carbon tax would protect the vulnerable by shifting taxes and providing income supplements to low-income households, May said.
High taxes on income and payroll don't give Canadians the financial flexibility to do things like increase the energy efficiency of their homes, she said.
"It needs to be explained, but I think Canadians are smart enough to understand the idea that we need to ensure that we reduce our use of fossil fuels, that the climate crisis is upon us, and this is not the only thing we need to do, but it is the foundation for a successful climate policy," May said.
Oil prices are high and likely to stay there in the near term. Some analysts think introducing a carbon tax now would be a politically risky move.
"Canadians are sick of politicians who don't tell them the truth," May said.
Some politicians "want to pander to prices at the pump while ignoring disappearing glaciers, persistent droughts and increased storm events," she said.
"We need to act on the climate crisis, and I'm disappointed that Mr. Layton is on the wrong side of this one."
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(44)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
jdude
said
reg fine
said
Justin Williams
said
If May and her liberal friends have their way, those who cannot afford the high costs of energy retrofits paying for subsidies to those who currently can. It is a regressive policy and a step towards a much more regressive tax structure in Canada.
Ken P.
said
Socialism is killing us.
said
Jonzo
said
Greg in the Hammer
said
Canada is not Europe. Our climate dictates we use fossil fuels to heat our homes, transport our goods and people. We will continue to do this for the forseeable future.
Even in Europe, especially the UK there is a growing backlash and realization that a carbon tax is not working. Its simply a cash cow for government.
Regulating industry while investing in infrastructure and transit initiatives, as well as alternative fuels and energy systems is the way to proceed in my view.
Stephen Green
said
inversity
said
Those two parties--the environment and economics--seem to be at war with each other, and politicians of all stipes seem to want to protect their own interests rather than Canadian interest. This also applies to corporations and foundations, as well as scientists, both in the fields of economics and the environment.
There seems to be no way out of the impasse, at present...
Agreeing With the NDP
said
The trickle down effect will invade every aspect of our lives and sink the economy as well as shuffle most of us off to the poorhouse.
The Greens want it that way though. The oppose a high standard of living for most of society other than themselves. The environmental groups make millions of dollars every year.
Ted
said
W Wall
said
Carbon taxes are useless for reducing emissions. They just hurt rural folk and drive up the price of heating, groceries and anything else shipped by truck.
There's a lot of good ways to deal with the environment. A carbon tax on fuel is NOT one of them, especially in a struggling economy.
LeMontrealais
said
Andrew in BC
said
Bowmanvillian
said
As for how it will effect us, there are many countries using a carbon tax already and the results so far have been promising. It's done much better than a cap and trade system which has only made some wealthy individuals wealthier.
Reuben
said
I like the NDP's ideas more than this Carbon Tax crap. I guess the Liberals and Green don't think we're taxed enough as it is...
JR
said
david
said
Fred
said
"I say tax the Greens, NDP and Liberals into oblivion. Much simpler."
right and by doing so, turn Canada into a one party dictatorship?
CLOKE
said
BW
said
If the Libs follow through and tax the things that are bad they will either tax the oil companies or bring in an additional consupmtion tax.
EITHER WAY the price to fill up everyones car will go up.
ME
said
First in the town I live in there is no bus service so we have to drive. Secondly our temperatures are much colder than the south. Hence we use more gas or oil to heat our houses.
Why is taxation the only way to go and what will it solve? Those who can or must will still drive. It's just harder on those who must.
A carbon tax doesn't work, it's just more revenue for the government it will solve nothing.
Shawn
said
I can't wait for this to put out and the goverment to be toppled so we can elect a Conservative majority.
BW
said
Listen people revenue neutral only means that they will spend the extra money that they bring in. It DOES NOT mean that there won't be any impact. Nor does it mean it won't have a negative effect on our pocket books.
In addition people living in big cities where there is alternative means of transportation may be able to minimizing the impact of the tax by changing their method of transportation, were as people living in remote sparsely populated areas will ultimately be impacted more.
JR
said
Dan in Edmonton
said
javid radfar
said
Daryl
said
Now I'm no supporter of the NDP but Jack couldn't have hit the nail better. If you don't want to hurt the middle class, we CANT have a carbon tax.
Grant
said
By rolling back taxes on the work we do, a tax that makes NO sense at all (why tax a person on their worth to society?), and placing the taxes onto the sorts of things that cost society more, we shift towards a more realistic and sustainable economic model for many generations to come, and force environmentally-ignorant companies to change their ways.
Gord G.
said
Isn't $1.31 litre a consequence for using fossil fuel. The incentive to reduce is already in place, high gas prices.
B. Lang
said
Brandon
said
Where is this proposal saying gas won't be taxed? To my knowledge the Liberals haven't released any information on there carbon tax yet.
Al from Calgary
said
MRM
said
Raymond
said
Ryan
said
If the Liberal-Green Party gets its way, our economy will be in ruins. Inflation is already going up -- due to higher housing, fuel, and food costs. Adding another tax on fuel will -- pardon the pun -- add fuel to the fire of inflation.
The Conservatives are representing middle class Canadians by opposing the horrendous Liberal-Green carbon tax proposal, and equally naive NDP cap and trade proposal.
If only the NDP could get its head out of the sand and realize that capping and trading will only put more money into the back pockets of heavily polluting multinational corporations.
Albert
said
Paul B
said
"Once again it's been proved that Jack Layton and his NDP gangs are out of touch. They do nothing but help Condervatives stay in power".
Actually JR, the real reason the Conservative's remain in power is because the Liberal's run and hide, oops, sorry, abstain whenever there is a vote that might cause an election.
As for a carbon tax, we can't control the temperature. So what if we get hit with another long winter with bitter freezing temperatures? Please explain how seniors and those living in poverty can come up with the extra "carbon tax".
And the Liberal's say they will lower taxes $10 billion, and will bring in $13.5 billion with a carbon tax. How exactly is the revenue neutral?
Terry
said
I think the rhetoric about taxing things we don't like such as carbon, and not taxing things we like such as income is so misleading. How many of us actually make our income without the use of some sort of carbon based fuel?
michael monchamp
said
Wacko Canadian
said
Rural Environmentalist
said
Shame on May
And bravo to Jack Layton and the NDP. Thank you for being the only leader and party in Canada putting forward workable, practical suggestions. All the Greens seem to be doing is adding to global warming by spewing hot air.
Charles
said
Nowonder
said
I am sickened by all the global warming deniers here. I bet these (ignorant) deniers will be the first in line to ask for the government's help (with our tax dollars) when global warming starts affecting the "Canadian" way of life. These must be the people that I see every day throwing plastic bottles in the garbage, idling their cars for 20 minutes when picking up their kids from school or insisting on double-bagging everything at the grocery store. Ignorance. Just plain IGNORANCE. I feel sorry for them.