News Sections
Quebecers urged to be more open toward immigrants
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(45)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. May. 20 2008 6:26 PM ET
Quebecers will be urged to be more open in accommodating minorities, according to a leaked report.
The report, which stems from a commission set up to examine reasonable accommodation, is expected to be released later this week by co-chairs Gerard Bouchard and Charles Taylor.
In several chapters of the final draft obtained by The Montreal Gazette, the commissioners argue that the "discontent of a large part of the population" over accommodation demands by Muslims, Jews and other religious minorities appears to be the "result of partial information and false perceptions."
The Gazette's Jeff Heinrich told CTV's Montreal on Tuesday that "it's very clear that they (the commissioners) want a continuation of the Quebec policy of integration of minorities in the best way possible."
The report also addresses a number of "unfounded objections" to the role of religion in Quebec society, reports The Gazette.
The objections were mostly heard from old-stock francophones during public hearings held last fall.
The commissioners say they think "it is possible to re-concile Quebecers -- franco-phones and others -- with practices of harmonization, once it has been shown that:
- a) these practices respect our society's fundamental values, notably the equality of men and women.
- b) they don't aim to create privileges but, rather, equality that is well understood and that respects everyone's rights.
- c) they encourage integration and not marginalization.
- d) they're framed by guidelines and protected against spiralling out of control.
- e) they're founded on the principle of reciprocity.
- f) they don't play the game of fundamentalism.
- g) they don't compromise the gains of the Quiet Revolution."
The report says the responsibility for open-mindedness and desire for change rests primarily with French-Canadians who "have a strong feeling of insecurity for the survival of their culture."
They fear losing their "values, language, tradition and customs" and they also fear "disappearing" entirely as a French-speaking minority in North America, says the report.
The commissioners say self-doubt and "the fear of the Other" are the "two great hindrances" from the French-Canadian past.
"In the past, the threat came mainly from the anglophone. Before that, it was the lifestyle brought on by industrialization. Today, for many, it's the immigrant," they write.
Quebec Premier Jean Charest called the commission ahead of the provincial election in March 2007.
At that time, debate over how to accommodate minorities was at its peak after the small rural town of Herouxville, Que., adopted bylaws banning the stoning of women and the covering of faces.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(45)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
This is a moral test for voters in the municipal election. Electing him will be a stamp of approval for his actions. I strongly believe that the first thoughts should be for the person he has publicly humiliated, his partner. By his conduct he has made of himself, merely, a footnote in the election.


Comments are now closed for this story
Shamaro
said
Mario
said
I am happy to see a report which finally exposes it. The Bloc and PQ have constantly said Quebec welcomes immigration, but it’s nothing but BS. I agree that if you want to live here you need to be able to work in French and I have no problems with that, but if I make the effort I expect to be included in the society.
Most French Canadians that are under 30-35 will welcome you if you make the effort to integrate. It’s the middle-aged and older demographic that is stuck in the 70`s and 80`s where it was separatist vs. federalist and they don’t seem change.
I am just anxious to see how the French media will spin the report……
AngloQuebecBornDomesticRefugee
said
Would that refer to the complte revocation of all anglophone and allophone rights that occurred and continues!?
Those "gains" drove my family out of the province on a wave of bombing and abuse back in the 60s.
It is laughable to me that there can even be any discussion with the "old stock" francophones about rights for anyone except themselves.
rich...
James
said
Ian
said
There is nothing wrong with reasonable accommodation. But politicians, the courts, and most immigrants seek a sky's the limit approach.
Matt
said
Laura Langstaff
said
Francoise Gioui
said
More truthly, the long knives of the French pure-lennes after the english and others to eliminate restriction to the French world of Quebec to become the isolated sphere of influence that it wanted to return to. That was the reason for the comment of "les autres".
Lee
said
IAN
said
bobby
said
Those that remain in Quebec are less likely to be accepting of immigrants who they see as draining the resources available to support their lifestyles at home.
And they are learning to speak English too in order to facilitate their economic success in their new home.
Melting pot is solution
said
A melting pot like in the US where immigrants must integrate into American society and culture is a much better approach.
GM
said
The Real Jonny
said
jdude
said
job
said
Vanessa C
said
People throughout CANADA period have to accept that each culture has their own beliefs and traditions. They have a RIGHT to them. To their CHOICES. Wearing a hijab or even being niqabi is a CHOICE.
Those who are intolerant are lacking in the intelligence factor. They cannot think beyond their own narrow definitions and expectations of society.
truthseeker
said
In 1991, 2.5 million people were members of the visible minority population, 9.4% of the population. The visible minority population further increased to 3.2 million in 1996, or 11.2% of the total population. By 2001, their numbers had reached an estimated 3,983,800 or 13.4% of the total population.
Between 2001 and 2006, the visible minority population increased at a much faster pace than the total population. Its rate of growth was 27.2%, five times faster than the 5.4% increase for the population as a whole.
In 2006, the census enumerated an estimated 5,068,100 individuals who belonged to the visible minority population. They made up 16.2% of the total population in Canada.
The truth is for a good majority of Canadian's, this rate of growth is not beneficial to their Canada. It could lead to many social problems for future generation Canadian's.
Fill in the blank
said
Asking how many languages you speak is practical.
However,who decides how visible you are? Isn't beauty in the eye of the beholder?
Ian Yellowknife
said
NW
said
I have encountered a woman once who thought I don't know Quebec law because I was not born here. That kind of hostile resentment makes me mad and shows how some French-Canadians are totally ignorants. Show them how to treat people with dignity and respect, then I will start treat them the same.
Glenn
said
Greg
said
Thanks
msamour
said
The main discussion was centered on immigrants wanting accomodations that are outside the norms of Quebec (and even outside Canadian) norms. What is significant about Quebec, is that the Quebec population will not be shy about telling immigrants to back off and start abusing the constitution. It is for this reason that Quebec was the first province to evaluate reasonable accomodation. The Commission did a good job at alienating people who have worked hard, and toiled on this land for the benefit of first generation immigrants that desire unreasonable change to our customs and traditions. One must really wonder who that Mr Bouchard, and Mr Taylor were rerally working for.
United we stand, divided we fall... choose !
said
I love Quebec and the people BUT, they need to look themselves in the mirror and decide if they want to join the global community or shun everybody else and live as a recluse in this new world we live in.
Quebec has a lot more to gain by changing their outdated attitudes towards the english and everybody else.
As for Ontario my home since 1973, they can stop being so snobby towards the Quebekers and embrace the great culture we can enjoy from the people of Quebec.
minorityjoe
said
vive a la france
Canadian citizen? ....then BE a Canadian.
said
Sorry, you don't come to my home and tell me what to do.... it doesn't work that way.
Back in 1999....
said
Quebec needs to get with the program and realize they stand to lose a lot unless they change their ways.
L.-P.C.
said
Immigration, as my in-laws experienced, can be an important part of our country. It can also be dangerous if uncontroled, as we sometimes have experienced. But, even my in-laws agree, any immigrant can expect to have to change a lot of their way of life. As the saying goes: "when in Rome, do as the Romans do."
You have to become a part of the life cycle that already exists at that location.
Please, do not change your religion or ask someone else to do so. That is unatural and unfair.
Just be prepared to start cheering and playing hockey, soccer (not football - ever)as a minor sport and , or go to the Brasserie (in Quebec) for a beer. Should I move elsewhere, I'd expect to adapt - I did for Toronto.
Accomodating immigrants only applies in that we have to welcome them as the humans that they are. Let's give them a chance to live as we do.
Basil
said
Guy Macher
said
StatsCan reported that immigrants are not assimilating, lack marketable skills, and after 10 years are nearly 150% more likely to be unemployed than native born Canadians. And after all that time only 70% have acceptable English, only 16% can speak French.
Why are we inviting people to Canada if there are no jobs for them?
marcel proulx
said
woody
said
truthseeker
said
What most Canadian's know is that our government is anti-family. Our government spends billions to bring immigrants here, train them, house them etc. Why don't we allocate that money to adult Canadian couples who want to start a family but can't afford to because all the jobs pay $10/hr. It seems the government is trying to replace the founding European settler population with a un-united minority population. Their intentions seem very evil minded to me personally.
We are forgetting why Canada even became a success.
Now if you've read the recent StatsCan study that says Canadian's quality of life has gone down hill since 1980, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to see the parallel, it's about the same time our immigration policy was hijacked by greedy, heartless, mindless people who took Canadian citizen's concerns as a joke.
There was no vote! We weren't asked! That's not democracy!
L.-P.C.
said
Pure-Laine and Québécois de souche refer to descendants of the original families that came to North America. Helen Desporte - my ancestor - was the very first person born in North America of non native parents.
AS for the protectionism of Bill 101 and other attitudes, Quebec had to "fight" back against English erasure and encroachment on the language just to try and survive. Have these measures outlived their usefulness. I don't know. I don't agree with the methodologies used on a lot of these. All I know is I have to work hard so that my children understand not only the languages -English and French - but also the cultures associated with both.
Being a true Canadian requires work just to maintain when living in a multicultural area like Toronto is.
Jay
said
To find answers to the question of accomodation/integration we look to a term "multiculturalism." This term was not the product of some grande, liberal humanistic plan for Canada. It was Trudeau's response to billingualism and biculturalism.
Canadians need to actually define the grey space between accomodation and integration. Personally, if I chose to emmigrate to another country I would make every effort to integrate into that society. If one choses to emigrate and retain all of ones customs and nationalisms then they are purely economic immigrants.
I am afraid that a unique Canadian identity is at risk with an undefined policy of multiculturalism.
Cots
said
I think that by banning Hijabs Quebeckers exercise intolerance in the name of women's rights and freedom. They're not fooling anyone but themselves..
RB
said
This is a two-way deal.
Carla
said
Andrew
said
However, when ANY Canadian must bend over backwards to accomodate immigrants, than I think that is wrong.
You come to our country, you accept our culture and ways of life. WE should not have to change our culture and way of life for an immigrant.
This is a two-way street..
PB
said
Mickey
said
Kris Pittman
said
Roger T
said
No point of bickering on this issue which will go on forever until Quebecers get their separation. Better sooner than later because of the build up from pressure and steam will rise again!
Proud Canadian
said