Health -
News Sections
Merck says Vioxx verdict overturned on appeal
Font-size:
Share
Print
The Associated Press
Date: Wednesday May. 14, 2008 4:22 PM ET
TRENTON, N.J. A Texas appeals court has overturned a multi-million dollar verdict against Merck and Company, the former maker of Vioxx.
The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals said the family of 71-year-old Leonel Garza didn't prove that a 23-year battle with heart disease wasn't what led to a fatal heart attack in 2001.
Garza had been taking Vioxx for less than a month when he died.
In 2004, Vioxx was taken off the market after studies showed it doubled the risk of heart attacks and strokes.
That led to numerous lawsuits against Merck, which has a US$4.85-billion settlement pending to end the bulk of the personal injury suits.
Garza's family was originally awarded $32 million two years ago, though damage caps cut that to about $8 million.
During the trial in Harlingen, Texas, Merck lawyers argued that Garza's heart attack was the end result of his 23 years of heart disease.
"Today's decision reaffirms that there is simply no reliable scientific evidence that Vioxx caused Mr. Garza's heart attack," Ted Mayer, Merck's outside legal counsel, said in a statement.
After the trial, a juror admitted borrowing thousands of dollars from Garza's widow, Felicia Garza, although that does not seem to have been a factor in Wednesday's appellate court decision.
Merck shares rose 70 cents, or 1.8 per cent, to $39.87 in afternoon trading Wednesday. Shares have traded between $36.80 and $61.62 over the past 52 weeks.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
The chance of the destruction of our planet is very very small with this collider, but who are these people to decide what risks are acceptable for all of mankind? It puts me at unease and adds to my anxiety. CERN acknowledges that there are miniscule risks -- they admit to it so please spare the convoluted retorts.
