CTV News | United Nations to resume aid shipments to Burma

Top Stories -   

United Nations to resume aid shipments to Burma

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Steve Chao on the human crisis
CTV Newsnet: U.N. World Food Programme
CTV Newsnet: Burma's government in exile speaks
CTV Newsnet: Igor Dmitryuk, Red Cross

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(53)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Fri. May. 9 2008 10:54 PM ET

With more rain in the forecast, Burmese officials are still denying U.S. emergency help for hundreds of thousands of people in dire need of help in the wake of Cyclone Nargis.

But there was some positive news Friday for the country's residents as they try to survive the cyclone's devastation.

The United Nations announced it will resume shipments of humanitarian aid to Burma on Saturday.

The announcement came just hours after suspending the deliveries over concerns the country's ruling military junta was seizing the shipments. The country's military junta said it would distribute the aid itself.

Since the cyclone hit, the UN World Food Programme has managed to distribute food staples, like rice, to 24,000 people in Burma, including those in the hardest hit areas, said Caroline Hurford of the UN World Food Programme.

But international relief workers fear the Burmese government's dithering will further postpone relief and make a dire situation even worse. Meanwhile, voting has begun in some areas on a controversial referendum on a new constitution. Human rights groups believe military leaders may be counting on the recent mayhem to maintain power.

The U.S. embassy in Yangon has said that the death toll could eventually exceed 100,000, and thousands of children may be orphaned.

But Hurford told CTV Newsnet she feels reasonably optimistic that the WFP can work alongside the Burmese government in the coming days.

"We are working with them. We are working around the clock to resolve the issues because we need to reach the most hungry," she said from Rome.

Hurford says the WFP is backing-up stockpiles so aid can be shipped as soon as it's needed.

Earlier Friday, World Food Program spokesperson Paul Risley said all the food and equipment sent to Burma had ended up in the possession of the military junta.

Two planeloads of high-energy biscuits capable of feeding 95,000 people arrived in the cyclone-ravaged Southeast Asian nation on Friday were seized by the military.

Risley said the organization had no choice but to put any further shipments on hold until the aid was released to those who need it.

Risley blasted the military junta for its refusal to allow foreign aid workers into the country to help victims of the cyclone.

He called the junta's actions "unprecedented," saying the WFP has submitted 10 visa applications on behalf of aid workers but none have been approved.

"The frustration caused by what appears to be a paperwork delay is unprecedented in modern humanitarian relief efforts,'' said Risley, who is based in Bangkok, Thailand.

"It's astonishing. We strongly urge the government of Myanmar to process these visa applications as quickly as possible, including work over the weekend."

CTV's Steve Chao, reporting from Bangkok, said UN officials usually try to be diplomatic but it is becoming increasingly difficult.

"They believe that in the next few days they are going to see a number of people dying due to simple things like starvation and water-borne diseases," said Chao.

"It's been seven days since the storm and very little international aid has gotten through."

According to state-media, 22,997 people died and 42,019 are missing following the cyclone, which struck the country's Irrawaddy delta.

In a statement issued Friday, the junta said it was grateful for all of the international assistance but that the best way to help was by sending in material, rather than personnel.

Burma has allowed some Asian neighbours -- such as Thailand and India -- to help. But its ruling junta apparently fears other nations may take advantage of the situation for nefarious reasons.

"The reason behind this, many people believe, is that the Burmese government was trying to hold a referendum, and may still try to hold a referendum, on a new constitution Saturday and the fear is that if foreign groups are allowed in they could influence the vote," said Chao.

"Many people are against this constitution saying it is simply a guise to allow the military rulers to keep rule over the country," said Chao.

Meanwhile, Canadian MPs unanimously adopted a resolution Friday urging Burma to accept international aid. Canada has offered to send its Disaster Assistance Response Team and has pledged $2 million to relief efforts.

The motion also denounced the military junta for failing to open its borders to aid workers and for seizing aid shipments.

On Thursday, Canada offered to send its expert Disaster Assistance Response Team to Burma to help victims.

In addition, Canada has also promised $2 million in aid.

With files from The Associated Press

Please Add Comments( )

Shamaro
said
0 0

This is a tragedy that this country has slowed the process of letting aid workers into their country. Hundreds of thousands of people are now possibly dead and many more are awaiting medical lattention, clean drinking water and the rest of the basic necessities of life.

The UN could have and should have invoked a part of it's charter by voting within the General Assembly and the Security Council, by brining in an emergency resolution allowing all international aid to be brought into Burma regardless of what the government says, due to the extrodinary conditions and human suffering on a massive scale.

People always wonder why there's such sadness and tragedy in this world. Well, just look at Burma as an example and how a government has allowed such affliction upon their own people and you'll get your answers.


Matt
said
0 0

At the end of the day the world is faced with two options. Do what is right for humanity, or do not. Although I am all for politics, the simple end truth is people are dieing through no fault of there own, and a neo nazi military government is more concerned with its own grip on power then the people it controls, to hell with the UN. The west is hated as it is, nothing we say or do will change that, so I say let history judge us, get over there, and help people..... politicians be dammed.


Freedom For Burma
said
0 0

It's high time to invade "Myanmar" and bring justice back into this nation. This dictatorship has done nothing more than opress the people. Democracy is needed and the people need to be liberated.


pp
said
0 0

Well we offered help.
It was turned down.
So be it.
Let it go.

There are plenty of other more grateful and thankful countries out there that deserver our assistance. We can grieve over the loss of life and hold them up as an example of what complete and utter useless, ineffectual leaders they really are.

Personally I don't wish to assist any country that spends more on its military than is has in GDP.... I know that even if we did send supplies I am betting it would end up somehow, someway into their military's hands... PLEASE do not send any of my money / materials to them at all....

Yes I feel for the people who will suffer but I am sure those people will eventually come to realize that their gov't is a bunch of useless, underachieving, pompous, uncaring, sociopaths.... and the REALLY sad thing is that they really cannot do anything about it.


Nora Dunn & Kelly Bedford
said
0 0

We are two Canadians who until yesterday were traveling through northern Thailand, blissfully unaware of the devastation so close to us. The storm narrowly missed us. We are safe and sound, but millions of people a mere few hundred kilometers away are homeless, starving, and hundreds are dying each hour.

We have basically canceled our trip through SE Asia in an attempt to provide assistance however we can.
In the past 24 hours, we have gone from deciding to rent a truck and drive supplies to the border ourselves, to coordinating our efforts with the Chiang Mai Rotary Club and Thai Air Force to potentially have a C-130 Hercules cargo airplane at our disposal.

Nothing is final yet, but we are all moving as quickly as possible, knowing that each hour of inactivity brings with it more suffering.

Once we have confirmed the details of getting into Burma with supplies, we will be asking fellow Canadians, fellow travelers in Thailand, and their friends and family to donate to our cause. Every single dollar will be used to purchase supplies here in Chiang Mai, and load them on a plane (courtesy of the Thai Air Force), and drop them where they are needed in Burma. No middle man, no profits, no strings attached.

Please pray for the Burmese people in their time of need. We are extremely busy with the logistics right now, and as soon as we are able, we will be sending out requests for donations.


Michael
said
0 0

The UN knows that any action that would be taken would take time and would need the help of China, who has veto powers in the Security Council. By the time the process is done, how many people would be dead?

To force a military government to allow non-military and military help from other countries would only be putting more lives at risk of possible action. The Red Cross says they have people on the ground but how much aid is actually getting through? How much aid, if sent blindly, will not end up being stockpiled by the military govt?

The people suffer, but eventually it is the people that will decide the fate of their govt. The world can only do so much.


Andrew in BC
said
0 0

GO! GET THE BLASTED HELP IN THERE NOW! Who cares about sovereignty, there are hundreds of thousands of people in need and nobody has the steel to get in there. And now on television behind me I see that the UN has suspended aid because the Junta (or whatever) are taking the aid packages and using it themselves! What?

Go United States, Go Canada, Go United Nations, Go China...all of you, get IN THERE!


Michele
said
0 0

Its too bad they won't accept help but its not the first time a country refuses help. You only have to look back as far as hurricane Katrina. The US refused Cuba's offer to send some 1,600 medics, field hospitals and 83 tons of medical supplies to ease
the humanitarian disaster. I guess some countries put politics before helping the people.
I believe the US did accept the five million dollars in fuel assistance from Venezuela however.


Old Redneck
said
0 0

This is absoloutely horrible! What kind of government would block desperately needed aid to the people who are sure to suffer for months to come. International intervention is needed NOW! Having said that, even if it happened tomorrow, it would still be too late. Enough with "International pressure". It takes too long and simply doesn't work. It is time for the free world to send in a death squad and wipe this dictatorship off the face of the earth. I realize that this sounds way off the wall, but it is the right thing to do.


Bob
said
0 0

This is information for Nora Dunn & Kelly Bedford in Thailand.

I do not know if you are aware what is going on right now in Burma. The military has taken the supplies sent by the UN. They will not be going to the people in need.

For now the UN has stopped all shipments to Burma until the military there will allow people in to distribute the aid.

I ask you to not send ANYTHING there until it will be allowed into the country with people to distribute what you send. If not the military will grab everything and none will to to where it is needed.




David fm NS
said
0 0

I guess the world will finally get to see beyond Rangoon. It's too bad that these people have to suffer so much.


Leslie
said
0 0

They don't want assistance. Don't give it them. Sounds Cold. However, that is the truth. These types of nations do not want their population to succeed. They do not want their people to live freely, healthy or anything that would distrupt these kinds of regimes to hold power.
As long as we have poor nations they will always be humanitarian aid. Humanitarian aid which are depleting the care of our own people and neglect of our own standards. We soon will be starving our own citizens. Until the United Nations and All Humanitairn and Charities realize the death of these people are not just from the cyclone. they are more from the life their own countries has imposed on the citizens. Power in these regimes are about holding citizens hostage and blaming western civilization.

People all the world need help. They dont get because their countries dont want. These regimes would rather have weapons of war than care about their own citizens.

This is a world of good and evil. So far Evil is ahead. GOOD will come as it always done.




Matt
said
0 0

There is no political will to invade and help these people.

It's been tried, people think it is a good idea, but then after you invade, and overthrow the local authorities you have to police and rebuild for years.
Years of rebuilding while our soldiers die won't be tolerated by most western democracies. You don't have to look to far to see many Canadians aren't willing to put their soldiers at risk to save tens of thousands of people on the other side of the world.


Conrad
said
0 0

This beyond reason and definitely appalling - it sure seems to me that the Junta is committing a crime against humanity of the highest order. The facts that they are not permitting aid in (and keeping what has trickled in) nor approving visa's is definitely a crime. I agree that the UN needs to interfere into this horrific situation as soon as possible.


Hugh Englouen
said
0 0

This country has been severely oppressed under this military junta regime for a long long time.
They have ignored their Burmese people's human rights to live and they are afraid to allow the outside to see what we already know. They continue to allow human atrocities to continue and UN was right to condemn the junta for their inactions. We cannot sit by and continue to watch children die needlessly!
Surely their leaders will be brought to justice despite the diplomatic approaches from around the world.


Bill
said
0 0

This provides a much better reason to invade a country that anything dreamed up for Iraq. It would be justified in the name of humanity. To hell with politics.


Donna
said
0 0

To quote a Burmese man "The soldiers will come when they need to beat us...where are they now?"
We need to start invading and liberating people who are bullied by a military junta who imprison even those who were duly elected.
God help those people 'cus we don't have the will to do it. Why? No oil?


Meg in QC
said
0 0

You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink! I agree with the UN's action of suspending aid to Burma,. I feel for the devastated people who really need the help, but on the other hand the military is not where I want to see that aid go!
It just proves in third world countries the answers to help the common person can not come from the outside world and that keeps the people subserviant to the rule of their corrupt governments.


Micheal
said
0 0

If the world outside Burma really cares about the people in suffering in Burma, please send your supplies to the disastrous region without any condition. If you really care about the Burmese, you would also hand over your supplies to Thailand or Indian authority, let them help the Myanmar people. I just feel that it is hypocritic, if you see people dying over there and put any condition for help. Please open your heart, I believe Burmese government is going to do any thing to save their people, the people in the water is their brothers and sisters, they love them and care them more than you and me do. Please don't waste time, the people there only need is food, water and supplies, not arguing.

Please, Please, Please stop wasting the precious time, Please help!


gREG
said
0 0

Well one answer is for Canada, USA, UN and other countries to drop aid via air. AT least these supplies would be received by the people who need them. This would work well for food stuffs.


DJ
said
0 0

It does not surprise me that military takes the aid that is sent. I think we should also send money so they can take that too. To think that they would do this is absolutely unbelievable, but then again they don't treat there citizens as humans but like dogs. My heart goes out to the people of Burma


Hope for a better world!
said
0 0

DIPLOMACY..what diplomacy?
These are 40,000 bullies with guns who were never elected!!
Its time we started knocking down the "little Hitlers" of the world before an audience who holds us accountable.


Madashell
said
0 0

I thought I read or heard that the States were considering air drops of food and supplies? That would surely get the supplies right to the people rather than to the 'Nazi' style government. If all the UN members started air drops the situation would soon change. Of course the people would not have the help of Aid Workers but at least they would have food and water and shelter and clothing etc. Or am I just dreaming?


Matt
said
0 0

Donna,
We invaded to liberate before. The political will isn't there.

Even with the success in Afghanistan many Canadians don't think it's worth it, at least not anymore.

Do you think they would feel different about Burma in a years time?


Anne
said
0 0

Leave them alone. Let their blood be on the hands of their oppressive government, that seems to be what they want, it's a darned disgrace. The rest of the world can't force itself on a sovereign nation, no matter how nasty it is. Help was offered and refused. Save our supplies and volunteers for the next affected country that will welcome outside aid. God help the poor people of Myanmar.


Rob
said
0 0

PP: you missed the boat! There are 1.5 million people in Myanmar/Burma that would be more than happy to recieve aid, and would be very grateful. The problem isn't the country, rather the UNELECTED military regime that controls the country. I understand the frustration of the UN, (although I'm not a big fan of the UN), I say do food drops directly to the people and hope you don't get shot down...


JP
said
0 0

This truly is a tragedy. But in the end, what's really is wrong with a small culling of the population? We need more of that, in fact...as long as it happens in other countries.


Sean Calder
said
0 0

I'm sorry but I have to laugh at many of the comments by people here, those who are saying forget about politics and invade regardless of what their government says because the humanitarian reasons would justify it.

This was the exact same situation in Afghanistan 10 or so years ago. Military Junta (Taliban) controlling the population and letting the people starve etc etc. We invade after 911 gives us "cause".

These SAME people are the ones who rage against the War in Afghanistan and yet, AND YET, here they are screaming for an invasion of a different country for humanitarian reasons. Make up your minds people.


Sonny
said
0 0

OMG! Has everyone forgotten the parable of the Good Samaritan???? Have we in the west become so apathetic and complacent that instead of helping these poor souls out that we are just going to shake our heads and mumble: “Too bad, so sad” and then conveniently flip the channel???? This is absolutely incredible! How many times have we conveniently turned the other way? Rwanda? Darfur? The Ethnic cleansing in the Balkans prior to March 1999? The turning away of Jewish Refugees prior to WWII?

True – Myanmar has every right as an independent nation to do what they are doing right now. But is it also right to endanger the lives of hundreds of thousands because of a paranoid Junta who are only concerned with maintaining their twisted version of government??

True – They as a governing body of a country do have the right to assist in controlling the incoming supplies and relief aid from outside their country…BUT it is no freakin’ secret that they lack the resources to carry out this distribution and relief work unilaterally! Especially now after waiting so long which has allowed disease and hunger to gain a foothold!

Some keep saying ‘let it be and let the Myanmar Government remain accountable’ for their actions and inactions in the eyes of their citizens and of history.

Personally I have a family, and if it came down to a decision between outside nations having to force their way in to help out to keep MORE people from needlessly dying and me simply sitting by and watching my family and neighbours slowly succumb to hunger and disease. I would say, “forget what history thinks about it and HELP ME!” An historical analysis of this is something that can be done months and years from now. NOW help is needed.



DCI
said
0 0

Did it not surprise anyone that the corrupt military would take most of all the food and other supplies.
I agree with going in there with force and getting that country on the right track.
Now the world knows what is going on there. On the next shipment; instead of food, have a 1000 soldiers jump out! Then start moving in the goods.
And as usual; the UN sucks at getting things done.




E.C. Smyth
said
0 0

Carry a big stick! This is when the military strength of Canada and other allies should be raised in order to get dictatorships or military juntas to back out of the power they hold. No war would have to be fought as those in political power would run and hide.

I know some countries get involved in huge military efforts to help the citizens of other countries ... we actually have an opportunity to help millions of citizens who live in bad dictatorships and in military controlled counties ... and all we'd have to do is carry a big stick and show these others how to run their countries in a democratic fashion of some kind.


DW
said
0 0

It is time to invade Burma for the sake of its people. This is a tyranical militry government. They are hording donated food and keeping any money that they may have received. Let the people of Myanmar know what their government is doing and they will take care of this problem.


Tori
said
0 0

If there ever was a time when Military intervention was necessary, this is it!

When a military within a country can hold tons of food and aid and not distribute it, there has to be something done. Obviously military members are being fed and the rest starved.

The UN aid workers cannot enter Burma safely. If VISAs are not being issued there has to be a reason to believe anyone entering the country will be at risk.

The UN needs to have an emergency council and put in motion a military take over of that country. Far more people will die without the support of the UN.

Many countries have military organizations for emergency aid. Send those people in to help. With the UN's direction that can be accomplished and VISAs are not required.


RRO
said
0 0

This is a problem because we just gave the Generals the ability to pay off their soldiers and maintain power even longer.
Sanctions were causing depravation even for the soldiers which was creating resentment.
The aid will feed the soldiers and the civilians will continue to suffer. No aid should have been put into Burma until they agreeed to allow us to dispurse it.


Lance
said
0 0

I fully understand the extent of the disaster in Burma. Hoewver, for all of those people saying politics be damned, send in aid particularly if "forced", this is (under international law) an invasion. If this option is taken, it may be extremely difficult to distribute aid as it would more than likely be an operation which would be opposed by the military Junta in that country, not to mention that distribution of aid will already be difficult due to the poor road network (which will be degraded due to flooding). Unfortunately, the only option may be to wait while such a "kind and caring" government makes up its mind and decides not to take a long weekend away from issuing entry visas to aid workers...


Vince M
said
0 0

Michele. On Catrina and Cuba.

Do you honestly think Cuba would allow 1600 doctors to go to the US? How many of them do yo think would return?! It is one thing to show how magnanimous you are for cheap political gain but quite a different thing to follow through. It was right for the US to turn down a fake offer such as that.

And further there MAY have been an offer (anotehr political statement - follow through likely?) but I know of no such acceptance of aid from Venezuela. These two countries are pactically at war.


Vince M
said
0 0

Donna. You can't play the no-oil card on this one.

Burma has oil and gas fields and is a net exporter of oil. Not a lot but 20,000 barrels a day in 2007.

The reason people aren't invading is because the West has shown it has no stomach for losing a soldier anymore no matter how noble the cause - and politicians know this.


d in Victoria
said
0 0

To all those who want to invade Burma: SHAME. If you don't know by now that war is NOT a solution to starvation then start reading history books. Let the record show that Burma has NEVER invaded Canada. And now you want Canada to invade Burma??? By the way, the USA will not invade Burma: no oil there.


Roger T
said
0 0

Unfortunately, the more pressure the world applies to Burma the more it will have opposite effect on their political system. Pressuring a nation is not a way to changing their political system but rather seens as threats and bullying. In order to send a positivve message and goodwill gesture the world should back off and take a different approach in the very beginning rather than wait til diaster happens. In this case the world waited for diaster and now wants and demand political change by giving help and assistance to Burma thinking that this might bring change!


Angela
said
0 0

If there was ever a time for the global community to unite for a just cause it NOW. Recall how the world sat back while genocide occurred in Rwanda. Have we grown that callous and that concerned about political correctness that a massive human tragedy goes unaided? There must be a way to get aid in without the military regime taking it and letting the affected population die... If diplomatic pressure does not work, then I for one would support miliary/humanitarian action with a very tight focus on the goal of providing immediate aid....not invading a soverign country however dispicable the regime.

Please put pressure on to do something for people who are already lacking, and suffering in so many ways.


katie101
said
0 0

this isn't far I'm only 15 and i wanna help so bad up i feel so helpless...


steve I. C.
said
0 0

I disagree with Matt:
You don't have to look to far to see many Canadians aren't willing to put their soldiers at risk to save tens of thousands of people on the other side of the world.

Canadians want to help humanity survive not the rich american elite to make more money from controlling another regions oil.


Doug BC
said
0 0

"Invade to liberate".I think the jury is in on how rarely that succeeds.As has been said so many times,"the road to hell is paved with good intentions".
Air dropping some food aid might help,but people are needed as well.Clean water will be a huge problem. Both Canada and the USA are ready to send equipment to purify water. Sadly,the "evil west" is not welcome and China has no idea how to exercise it's influence in a positive way. Or,perhaps they simply aren't inclined to.
This is tragic. But finger pointing is useless because there are no simple answers here. No matter how well intended or sympathetic.


John from Fredericton
said
0 0

Tori

That's just an overreaction. If we send in the DART without permission from their military juntra, we'll be putting the DART in hazardous conditions.

Yes they have soldiers there to provide defence and security to DART, but DART is mainly there for humanitarian needs. Not combat.


M. La Rochelle
said
0 0

How civilized a people is judged by the way they treat their people and animals. Shame on a military regime that let people and animals starve while they polish their "medals" concerned with their own inflated egos.
"NERO FIDDLES WHILE ROME IS BURNING"


Roy
said
0 0

If the UN really wants to make a difference, they should just start large scale air drops, with fighter cover. Dare those butchers to stop it. Is China really going to make a big fuss, just before the games. I think not, as they already have a public relations nightmare with Tibet. It is a perfect opportunity to hammer a little sense into them.


Andre
said
0 0

This thread is so interesting...
Let me summarize:
A country is ruled by a horrible dictatorship which kills its people, starves them to death, kills any dissenter...and we are supposed to invade them to allow aid for the people.
Isn't it what we tried to do in Iraq and that was BAD?
I think Canada needs to take the lead in the UN and amend the Charter to say something to the effect that: "if there is overwhelming evidence that a country is killing its own population either by its actions or inaction, then the well-being of the people takes precedence over sovereinty and the UN will use force if necessary to bring help to the people".



Frank
said
0 0

That's right - we should send in the army, overthrow the dictatorship. Have a battle with the military (which would support the dictator). Have the military set up base their, and try to give out aid to the people and keep the law and order. Sounds like a little bit like what the US have been trying to do with Iraq, but they have not succeed, but peopel expect it to succeed in Burma (without any lost of lives).


bobby
said
0 0

Tori says:

"When a military within a country can hold tons of food and aid and not distribute it, there has to be something done. Obviously military members are being fed and the rest starved."

Ever heard of North Korea? In both cases, China's pals.


new place.
said
0 0

The frustration caused by what appears to be a paperwork delay is unprecedented in modern humanitarian relief efforts.

aklasg
said
0 0

For the aid workers - may have the entry visa system.


JJ
said
0 0

Sadly you cannot force people, governments, or any other organization to act well... To invade or even brow beat the military junta would be counter productive as they would incite the local populace to resist our Western efforts. All we can do in the West is demonstrate our good intentions and hope for the best.


pensha
said
0 0

The World Food Program has decided to send in two relief flights as planned tomorrow, while discussions continue...on the distribution of the food that was flown in today, and not released to WFP


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

In Pictures

Face of Tragedy

Face of Tragedy

Nearly a week after cyclone Nargis struck, a look at the chaos that remains.

Cyclone strikes Burma

Cyclone strikes Burma

Take a closer look at the chaos caused by cyclone Nargis, which tore through Burma.

CTV.ca Map

Burma flooding

Burma flooding

This detailed map shows the path of cyclone Nargis' and subsequent flooding.

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz

Most Talked about Stories

I don't blame Roy for wanting to win and as he gets older, it's more important for him to be on a winning team. It sure will be sad to see him go. With this ownership, it's more of a financial issue -- they just don't have and probably never will have the resources to put a winner on the field. Maybe they should look at selling the team to someone who can build a winner. And they wonder why the fan base is drying up.

roy

Report: Halladay 'not inclined' to re-sign with Jays