News Sections
United Nations to resume aid shipments to Burma
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(53)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. May. 9 2008 10:54 PM ET
With more rain in the forecast, Burmese officials are still denying U.S. emergency help for hundreds of thousands of people in dire need of help in the wake of Cyclone Nargis.
But there was some positive news Friday for the country's residents as they try to survive the cyclone's devastation.
The United Nations announced it will resume shipments of humanitarian aid to Burma on Saturday.
The announcement came just hours after suspending the deliveries over concerns the country's ruling military junta was seizing the shipments. The country's military junta said it would distribute the aid itself.
Since the cyclone hit, the UN World Food Programme has managed to distribute food staples, like rice, to 24,000 people in Burma, including those in the hardest hit areas, said Caroline Hurford of the UN World Food Programme.
But international relief workers fear the Burmese government's dithering will further postpone relief and make a dire situation even worse. Meanwhile, voting has begun in some areas on a controversial referendum on a new constitution. Human rights groups believe military leaders may be counting on the recent mayhem to maintain power.
The U.S. embassy in Yangon has said that the death toll could eventually exceed 100,000, and thousands of children may be orphaned.
But Hurford told CTV Newsnet she feels reasonably optimistic that the WFP can work alongside the Burmese government in the coming days.
"We are working with them. We are working around the clock to resolve the issues because we need to reach the most hungry," she said from Rome.
Hurford says the WFP is backing-up stockpiles so aid can be shipped as soon as it's needed.
Earlier Friday, World Food Program spokesperson Paul Risley said all the food and equipment sent to Burma had ended up in the possession of the military junta.
Two planeloads of high-energy biscuits capable of feeding 95,000 people arrived in the cyclone-ravaged Southeast Asian nation on Friday were seized by the military.
Risley said the organization had no choice but to put any further shipments on hold until the aid was released to those who need it.
Risley blasted the military junta for its refusal to allow foreign aid workers into the country to help victims of the cyclone.
He called the junta's actions "unprecedented," saying the WFP has submitted 10 visa applications on behalf of aid workers but none have been approved.
"The frustration caused by what appears to be a paperwork delay is unprecedented in modern humanitarian relief efforts,'' said Risley, who is based in Bangkok, Thailand.
"It's astonishing. We strongly urge the government of Myanmar to process these visa applications as quickly as possible, including work over the weekend."
CTV's Steve Chao, reporting from Bangkok, said UN officials usually try to be diplomatic but it is becoming increasingly difficult.
"They believe that in the next few days they are going to see a number of people dying due to simple things like starvation and water-borne diseases," said Chao.
"It's been seven days since the storm and very little international aid has gotten through."
According to state-media, 22,997 people died and 42,019 are missing following the cyclone, which struck the country's Irrawaddy delta.
In a statement issued Friday, the junta said it was grateful for all of the international assistance but that the best way to help was by sending in material, rather than personnel.
Burma has allowed some Asian neighbours -- such as Thailand and India -- to help. But its ruling junta apparently fears other nations may take advantage of the situation for nefarious reasons.
"The reason behind this, many people believe, is that the Burmese government was trying to hold a referendum, and may still try to hold a referendum, on a new constitution Saturday and the fear is that if foreign groups are allowed in they could influence the vote," said Chao.
"Many people are against this constitution saying it is simply a guise to allow the military rulers to keep rule over the country," said Chao.
Meanwhile, Canadian MPs unanimously adopted a resolution Friday urging Burma to accept international aid. Canada has offered to send its Disaster Assistance Response Team and has pledged $2 million to relief efforts.
The motion also denounced the military junta for failing to open its borders to aid workers and for seizing aid shipments.
On Thursday, Canada offered to send its expert Disaster Assistance Response Team to Burma to help victims.
In addition, Canada has also promised $2 million in aid.
With files from The Associated Press
User Tools
Related Stories
In Pictures
Cyclone strikes Burma
Take a closer look at the chaos caused by cyclone Nargis, which tore through Burma.
CTV.ca Map
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(53)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I don't blame Roy for wanting to win and as he gets older, it's more important for him to be on a winning team. It sure will be sad to see him go. With this ownership, it's more of a financial issue -- they just don't have and probably never will have the resources to put a winner on the field. Maybe they should look at selling the team to someone who can build a winner. And they wonder why the fan base is drying up.



Please Add Comments( )
Shamaro
0
said
0
The UN could have and should have invoked a part of it's charter by voting within the General Assembly and the Security Council, by brining in an emergency resolution allowing all international aid to be brought into Burma regardless of what the government says, due to the extrodinary conditions and human suffering on a massive scale.
People always wonder why there's such sadness and tragedy in this world. Well, just look at Burma as an example and how a government has allowed such affliction upon their own people and you'll get your answers.
Matt
0
said
0
Freedom For Burma
0
said
0
pp
0
said
0
It was turned down.
So be it.
Let it go.
There are plenty of other more grateful and thankful countries out there that deserver our assistance. We can grieve over the loss of life and hold them up as an example of what complete and utter useless, ineffectual leaders they really are.
Personally I don't wish to assist any country that spends more on its military than is has in GDP.... I know that even if we did send supplies I am betting it would end up somehow, someway into their military's hands... PLEASE do not send any of my money / materials to them at all....
Yes I feel for the people who will suffer but I am sure those people will eventually come to realize that their gov't is a bunch of useless, underachieving, pompous, uncaring, sociopaths.... and the REALLY sad thing is that they really cannot do anything about it.
Nora Dunn & Kelly Bedford
0
said
0
We have basically canceled our trip through SE Asia in an attempt to provide assistance however we can.
In the past 24 hours, we have gone from deciding to rent a truck and drive supplies to the border ourselves, to coordinating our efforts with the Chiang Mai Rotary Club and Thai Air Force to potentially have a C-130 Hercules cargo airplane at our disposal.
Nothing is final yet, but we are all moving as quickly as possible, knowing that each hour of inactivity brings with it more suffering.
Once we have confirmed the details of getting into Burma with supplies, we will be asking fellow Canadians, fellow travelers in Thailand, and their friends and family to donate to our cause. Every single dollar will be used to purchase supplies here in Chiang Mai, and load them on a plane (courtesy of the Thai Air Force), and drop them where they are needed in Burma. No middle man, no profits, no strings attached.
Please pray for the Burmese people in their time of need. We are extremely busy with the logistics right now, and as soon as we are able, we will be sending out requests for donations.
Michael
0
said
0
To force a military government to allow non-military and military help from other countries would only be putting more lives at risk of possible action. The Red Cross says they have people on the ground but how much aid is actually getting through? How much aid, if sent blindly, will not end up being stockpiled by the military govt?
The people suffer, but eventually it is the people that will decide the fate of their govt. The world can only do so much.
Andrew in BC
0
said
0
Go United States, Go Canada, Go United Nations, Go China...all of you, get IN THERE!
Michele
0
said
0
the humanitarian disaster. I guess some countries put politics before helping the people.
I believe the US did accept the five million dollars in fuel assistance from Venezuela however.
Old Redneck
0
said
0
Bob
0
said
0
I do not know if you are aware what is going on right now in Burma. The military has taken the supplies sent by the UN. They will not be going to the people in need.
For now the UN has stopped all shipments to Burma until the military there will allow people in to distribute the aid.
I ask you to not send ANYTHING there until it will be allowed into the country with people to distribute what you send. If not the military will grab everything and none will to to where it is needed.
David fm NS
0
said
0
Leslie
0
said
0
As long as we have poor nations they will always be humanitarian aid. Humanitarian aid which are depleting the care of our own people and neglect of our own standards. We soon will be starving our own citizens. Until the United Nations and All Humanitairn and Charities realize the death of these people are not just from the cyclone. they are more from the life their own countries has imposed on the citizens. Power in these regimes are about holding citizens hostage and blaming western civilization.
People all the world need help. They dont get because their countries dont want. These regimes would rather have weapons of war than care about their own citizens.
This is a world of good and evil. So far Evil is ahead. GOOD will come as it always done.
Matt
0
said
0
It's been tried, people think it is a good idea, but then after you invade, and overthrow the local authorities you have to police and rebuild for years.
Years of rebuilding while our soldiers die won't be tolerated by most western democracies. You don't have to look to far to see many Canadians aren't willing to put their soldiers at risk to save tens of thousands of people on the other side of the world.
Conrad
0
said
0
Hugh Englouen
0
said
0
They have ignored their Burmese people's human rights to live and they are afraid to allow the outside to see what we already know. They continue to allow human atrocities to continue and UN was right to condemn the junta for their inactions. We cannot sit by and continue to watch children die needlessly!
Surely their leaders will be brought to justice despite the diplomatic approaches from around the world.
Bill
0
said
0
Donna
0
said
0
We need to start invading and liberating people who are bullied by a military junta who imprison even those who were duly elected.
God help those people 'cus we don't have the will to do it. Why? No oil?
Meg in QC
0
said
0
It just proves in third world countries the answers to help the common person can not come from the outside world and that keeps the people subserviant to the rule of their corrupt governments.
Micheal
0
said
0
Please, Please, Please stop wasting the precious time, Please help!
gREG
0
said
0
DJ
0
said
0
Hope for a better world!
0
said
0
These are 40,000 bullies with guns who were never elected!!
Its time we started knocking down the "little Hitlers" of the world before an audience who holds us accountable.
Madashell
0
said
0
Matt
0
said
0
We invaded to liberate before. The political will isn't there.
Even with the success in Afghanistan many Canadians don't think it's worth it, at least not anymore.
Do you think they would feel different about Burma in a years time?
Anne
0
said
0
Rob
0
said
0
JP
0
said
0
Sean Calder
0
said
0
This was the exact same situation in Afghanistan 10 or so years ago. Military Junta (Taliban) controlling the population and letting the people starve etc etc. We invade after 911 gives us "cause".
These SAME people are the ones who rage against the War in Afghanistan and yet, AND YET, here they are screaming for an invasion of a different country for humanitarian reasons. Make up your minds people.
Sonny
0
said
0
True – Myanmar has every right as an independent nation to do what they are doing right now. But is it also right to endanger the lives of hundreds of thousands because of a paranoid Junta who are only concerned with maintaining their twisted version of government??
True – They as a governing body of a country do have the right to assist in controlling the incoming supplies and relief aid from outside their country…BUT it is no freakin’ secret that they lack the resources to carry out this distribution and relief work unilaterally! Especially now after waiting so long which has allowed disease and hunger to gain a foothold!
Some keep saying ‘let it be and let the Myanmar Government remain accountable’ for their actions and inactions in the eyes of their citizens and of history.
Personally I have a family, and if it came down to a decision between outside nations having to force their way in to help out to keep MORE people from needlessly dying and me simply sitting by and watching my family and neighbours slowly succumb to hunger and disease. I would say, “forget what history thinks about it and HELP ME!” An historical analysis of this is something that can be done months and years from now. NOW help is needed.
DCI
0
said
0
I agree with going in there with force and getting that country on the right track.
Now the world knows what is going on there. On the next shipment; instead of food, have a 1000 soldiers jump out! Then start moving in the goods.
And as usual; the UN sucks at getting things done.
E.C. Smyth
0
said
0
I know some countries get involved in huge military efforts to help the citizens of other countries ... we actually have an opportunity to help millions of citizens who live in bad dictatorships and in military controlled counties ... and all we'd have to do is carry a big stick and show these others how to run their countries in a democratic fashion of some kind.
DW
0
said
0
Tori
0
said
0
When a military within a country can hold tons of food and aid and not distribute it, there has to be something done. Obviously military members are being fed and the rest starved.
The UN aid workers cannot enter Burma safely. If VISAs are not being issued there has to be a reason to believe anyone entering the country will be at risk.
The UN needs to have an emergency council and put in motion a military take over of that country. Far more people will die without the support of the UN.
Many countries have military organizations for emergency aid. Send those people in to help. With the UN's direction that can be accomplished and VISAs are not required.
RRO
0
said
0
Sanctions were causing depravation even for the soldiers which was creating resentment.
The aid will feed the soldiers and the civilians will continue to suffer. No aid should have been put into Burma until they agreeed to allow us to dispurse it.
Lance
0
said
0
Vince M
0
said
0
Do you honestly think Cuba would allow 1600 doctors to go to the US? How many of them do yo think would return?! It is one thing to show how magnanimous you are for cheap political gain but quite a different thing to follow through. It was right for the US to turn down a fake offer such as that.
And further there MAY have been an offer (anotehr political statement - follow through likely?) but I know of no such acceptance of aid from Venezuela. These two countries are pactically at war.
Vince M
0
said
0
Burma has oil and gas fields and is a net exporter of oil. Not a lot but 20,000 barrels a day in 2007.
The reason people aren't invading is because the West has shown it has no stomach for losing a soldier anymore no matter how noble the cause - and politicians know this.
d in Victoria
0
said
0
Roger T
0
said
0
Angela
0
said
0
Please put pressure on to do something for people who are already lacking, and suffering in so many ways.
katie101
0
said
0
steve I. C.
0
said
0
You don't have to look to far to see many Canadians aren't willing to put their soldiers at risk to save tens of thousands of people on the other side of the world.
Canadians want to help humanity survive not the rich american elite to make more money from controlling another regions oil.
Doug BC
0
said
0
Air dropping some food aid might help,but people are needed as well.Clean water will be a huge problem. Both Canada and the USA are ready to send equipment to purify water. Sadly,the "evil west" is not welcome and China has no idea how to exercise it's influence in a positive way. Or,perhaps they simply aren't inclined to.
This is tragic. But finger pointing is useless because there are no simple answers here. No matter how well intended or sympathetic.
John from Fredericton
0
said
0
That's just an overreaction. If we send in the DART without permission from their military juntra, we'll be putting the DART in hazardous conditions.
Yes they have soldiers there to provide defence and security to DART, but DART is mainly there for humanitarian needs. Not combat.
M. La Rochelle
0
said
0
"NERO FIDDLES WHILE ROME IS BURNING"
Roy
0
said
0
Andre
0
said
0
Let me summarize:
A country is ruled by a horrible dictatorship which kills its people, starves them to death, kills any dissenter...and we are supposed to invade them to allow aid for the people.
Isn't it what we tried to do in Iraq and that was BAD?
I think Canada needs to take the lead in the UN and amend the Charter to say something to the effect that: "if there is overwhelming evidence that a country is killing its own population either by its actions or inaction, then the well-being of the people takes precedence over sovereinty and the UN will use force if necessary to bring help to the people".
Frank
0
said
0
bobby
0
said
0
"When a military within a country can hold tons of food and aid and not distribute it, there has to be something done. Obviously military members are being fed and the rest starved."
Ever heard of North Korea? In both cases, China's pals.
new place.
0
said
0
aklasg
0
said
0
JJ
0
said
0
pensha
0
said
0