CTV News | PM's residence needs $10 million in repairs

Canada -   

PM's residence needs $10 million in repairs

Viewer

CTV News Video

Mike Duffy Live: Auditor General Sheila Fraser
Mike Duffy Live: John Williamson, Canadian Taxpayers Federation
Mike Duffy Live: Party house leaders on the repairs needed at 24 Sussex Drive

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(31)

CTV.ca News

Date: Wed. May. 7 2008 8:02 AM ET

The prime minister and his family may have to pack up and find a new temporary home if they heed the advice of Canada's auditor general.

A report released by Sheila Fraser on Tuesday states that "24 Sussex Drive (is) showing signs of fatigue and wear, and (requires) extensive repair work."

The repairs are estimated to cost about $10 million, and the report notes that "prolonged access to 24 Sussex Drive will be required for rehabilitation of the residence." That would require the prime minister and his family to move out for up to 15 months.

On CTV's Mike Duffy Live, Fraser listed off a number of repairs that need to be made. She said:

  • The windows are extremely old
  • There is a lot of asbestos in the house
  • The residence does not have a sprinkler system

"The list goes on and on," Fraser said.

"We note in the report that there have been no repairs to 24 Sussex in 50 years. I think we can all appreciate in our own homes that you have to do this regular upgrading and maintenance on a very frequent basis," she said.

John Williamson of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation says he doesn't believe most people will have a problem with making the repairs. But he said what politicians should be concerned about is going over budget, as has been the case with similar public projects in the past. He also said the $10 million price tag for repairs may baffle some taxpayers.

"You see this cost and Canadians think, 'What on Earth will they be putting in to 24 Sussex that it would cost so much,'" Williams said on Mike Duffy Live.

Fraser said that 24 Sussex and Rideau Hall -- which Fraser's report said needs some repairs to its exterior -- are not like regular homes.

"They also have official functions and so require very particular facilities ... There are systems that go in there that would not go into an ordinary home," Fraser said.

Harper has said he thinks 24 Sussex is in adequate condition for now and that he has no plans to move out before the next election.

Some facts on 24 Sussex:

  • Built in 1866 by a private owner who was also a member of parliament
  • Called "Gorffwysta" or "place of rest" by its original owner
  • Purchased by the government in 1943
  • Situated on 4 acres of property along the Ottawa River
  • The building has 34 rooms
  • Pierre Trudeau added a swimming pool
  • Kim Campbell has been the only prime minister not to live in the residence since Ottawa purchased the home

Comments are now closed for this story

Carmel Divine from Québec (la belle)
said

It's a shame that 24 Sussex has gotten in such a "sorry state"...Let's repair it, and and do it properly...

I am resident "tour guide" when friends and family come to visit Gatineau/Ottawa.

It is in a beautiful location, and is located on a very interesting, and historical road.


Alberta Roger
said

SPEND THE MONEY AND FIX IT NOW OR WE WILL HAVE TO BUILD A COMPLETELY NEW ONE LATER REGARDLESS WHO THE PRIME MINISTER IS!
AS CANADIANS WE WANT TO HELP OTHER NATIONS SO MUCH WE FORGET TO REPAIR OUR OWN.


rob o.
said

I've been to 24 sussex 3 times in the past 6 years both inside and out. I was surprised at how.. well, old and unkept it looks. People will balk at costs etc, but it seriously does need repairs..

When i was at Stornoway last year, it seemed more updated.

People im sure will complain that the money can go elsewhere, but this is the home of our leader whether you like him or not (and for the record, i don't!), and he invites dignitaries and leaders there while representing us.

It definitely should be updated.


Preserve our National Tresaures!
said

24 Sussex Drive is our home our national home for our leader. It requires extensive renovations and they should be done. $10 million is not totally out of the question given the size age and location of where it is. 24 Sussex is used for more than just the PM's residence and deserves to be updated.




Mickey
said

When I approached a couple of MPs to tell them about the mental health needs of children in my community they said, "Start a foundation and earn some money because the government can't afford to help those kids." So I say if they want to fix that pathetic building, "Start a foundation because Canadian taxpayers can't afford it." The PM should live in a cardboard box until we have a society that looks after the needs of every Canadian child.


Hilary Darlow
said

Why would you want to stay with children , in a home with asbestos...
24 Sussex should be restored immediately. It is a landmark!


Garry
said

These official residences are heritage buildings and are representative of the enire country when our leaders entertain foreign guests. Like that old saying, You only get one chance to make a good first impression. From what I have read in this article, the first impression we make doesn't seem to be that good.


Zach
said

Why not spend the $10 million to build a new home for the Prime Minister? This building has always seemed to be nothing but a lemon for the country and the PM. Construct a beautiful new mansion for our leader, one tailored to meet modern needs.


Carol Stewart
said

Although I now live on the west coast Ottawa is a beautiful city and I am proud of the parliament buildings there and across Canada. When my husband retired we packed up and move to Ontario Toronto for one year and Ottawa for a year to get to know the culture, and the people etc.. What a great experience!! We have a beautiful country and some of the attractions is the preserved architecture,definitely do the repairs and remove the asbestos which is very unhealthy for the all the family. Replacing the windows is good for the environment as the energy that will save


Jason
said

Get Mike Holmes to do it right the first time!! Air the show!


Andy
said

People are worried about the impressions we make with foreign dignitaries!!? Just imagine the impression we would make if we built the PM a modest new home for half a million instead and he said to foreigners, "Excuse my humble residence but as long as we have Canadians living in poverty, having difficulty accessing health care, or wanting for anything that good government should help provide, then this is the best I can afford."

Mr Chillz
said

Since Harper sold us out to the North American Union, I'm sure he can find cheap labor to do it for a third of the cost!!!

Dan
said

Love Jason's idea. This would be a perfect Mike Holmes project and we would be saving our national residence at the same time. PM Harper will just have to move in with the in-laws for awhile.

Chris
said

As long as you do not disturb the asbestos, it is fine.
It needs to be updated, and as soon as you start that the asbestos becomes the big issue.
Gut it now and update it, if not it will be a 12..14..20 million dollar job. Find someone that will stand by there quote. Hold on it's the goverment job, tripple the estimate and time

John
said

The worst thing you can do to something or someone is change. Let's face it, this house was not designed nor intended to last this long. Much like other so called "landmarks" this place should be rebuilt, in the same style even, for far less money than repairing it would take. I'm all for history but 10 million could go to a much better cause than someone's house... like affordable housing in the city.

Vancouver Girl
said

This is something that needs to be done!

But maybe they'll do some renovations every few years so we don't get hit w/ a huge bill again. 50 years is a long time.

perma
said

It's likely cheaper to build him a new one... even if you knock down the old one first... but, let's build it next door, on the same property,... then he and his don't have to stay in a suite during the building or renovating.... and, as it's not like the white house, where there are tours..... big deal....

Tim
said

Just tear it down and build something nice at a fraction of the cost.

It may have history but it is a dump sucking tax dollars.

Those that want it saved should put up the money themselves.

Scott H.
said

I say fix it... no home should have asbestos in it nowadays. In addition, we need to preserve the heritage of the home before the damage becomes unfixable

scott
said

How about this Steph takes a holiday and gets his house fixed. Then we all show up for a BBQ when it is all finished. Fix the house!

ET
said

Now, any other home it would only be about 50K or so...

I think they should make Harper personally go through the hassles of setting up a loan, dealing with the contractors, and using the government programs for things like an "energy audit" and asboestos removal. Let's let him experience what things are like for the little people.


Shamaro
said

This is the official residence of the leader of our Great Nation. This is the place where heads of state and other foreign officials and provincial officials do business. A great many life changing policies that effect you and I take place at that residence. It's my opinion that 24 Sussex should go through serious renovations, not so much so that the PM can live a life of luxury, but because it is a place where our leaders meet with other leaders and the residence can tell the story of Canada to those who visit there.


Steve G
said

There should be plenty of time to get the necessary repairs done after Mr. Harper moves out following the next election.


Farm Boy
said

ET, you must be kidding me. This is the leader of this country in whom Canadians Voted in as their Prime Minister. Believe me, out of all the PM's who have served in that office over the last 2 generations, Mr. Harper is probably the most humblest who has gone and worked his way from a blue coloured background to where he is today. This man wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth! Then come to think of it, Harper, Chretien and Mulroney all lived very humble lives with humble beginnings. You don't think they know hardships? I say fix the darn place, spend $20 million and put in some proper security to keep the raving lunatics of this country off the premises.


P Minchin
said

You have to be kidding....10 Million.

For A Renovation.....?

Bulldoze the place, and for a measly 2 million, build a house with an indoor pool with PET's name on it, add amenities that the rest of us can only dream of, and we will all be happy.

Then the the "conservative" government can say that they have made one of the the fiscally responsible decisions that they so constantly remind us of.

Oh well.........


S. Paisley
said

I think this is something that has to be done and done correctly. As a taxpayer I feel that this would be money well spent and it's a direct reflection on Canada when visiting Heads of State visit the house.

FIX IT!

MB
said

Why spend $10 million to fix this house when you can spend a fraction of that to build a brand new one? Fixing it up makes NO sense. The wiring, plumbing, windows, etc all need to be redone so just tear the sucker down and start from scratch. less hassle, less money.


Shawn
said

In 1949 the Whithouse was almost completly gutted and rebuilt due to age.

Just do it. It would be a good time to make it 'green' as well. Canada has probable spent hundreds of thousands for heating and cooling from the old windows alone.


james
said

I'm all for fixing the PM's residence. However, you can build an incredible mansion for 4 million. 10 mil buys a lot of windows and sprinklers. Remind me not to use Fraser's contractor.


Georgie (Montreal)
said

10 Million is too much. Everything is always overestimated in this damn Country. Next thing, typical Canadian, there will be cost overruns.

For 10 Million, build a new place which will be modern and up to date including 10 Gig internet connection and lots of flat panel TVs and gadgets.

Forget heritage. We need to look to the future!




























































































.


Michelle
said

We need to fix this! The prime minister of our country needs to be treated differently than the rest of us!! The rest of us are not running the country! It is ignorant to expect that our prime minister should be running around making loans and hiring contractors. We pay him to run the country... that's what he's doing. We need to fix the house. We would not have this kind of debate if there were asbestos in a rental house. There would be an uproar if the landlord would even hesitate to fix it!! And he doesn't own this house...so it's no different.

Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

Related Websites

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz