CTV News | Hundreds of ducks die in oilsands tailings pond

Sci-Tech -   

Hundreds of ducks die in oilsands tailings pond

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Joel Gotlib on the tragedy

Font-size:      Share  Print  Comments(52)

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Wed. Apr. 30 2008 2:44 PM ET

Fingers are being pointed after hundreds of ducks were found dead or dying in a toxic tailings pond belonging to oilsands giant Syncrude Canada Ltd.

CTV Edmonton's Joel Gotlib told Newsnet on Wednesday that it's the worst such incident in the history of northern Alberta's oilsands.

Environmentalists are furious, governments are demanding answers and Syncrude -- located about 40 kilometres north of Fort McMurray -- is scrambling to contain the damage, he said.

The tailings ponds are formed during the oilsands extraction process, Miles Kitagawa of the Alberta Toxics Watch Society told CTV.ca on Wednesday.

"Syncrude utilizes something called the Clark hot water process, where they crush bitumen-containing oil, mix it with heated water and use that to separate the bitumen out of the ore," he said.

The leftover water is dumped in the tailings ponds, which contain a mixture of clay, sand water and hydrocarbons, he said.

Drinking a glass of water from a tailings pond would be like drinking a diluted glass of oil or gasoline, Kitagawa said.

The ponds are supposed to have measures in place that keep migrating waterfowl from landing on the ponds, such as scarecrows and noisemakers.

In a news release issued Tuesday, Syncrude's president and CEO Tom Katinas said noisemakers had been deployed at all the company's other tailings ponds.

"However, due to the extreme winter weather conditions in the region last week, the deployment of these devices on the Aurora Settling Basin was delayed," he said.

"After the rapid weekend thaw, we were in the process of deploying the audible noisemakers on Monday, April 28th when this incident occurred. Eighteen propane-fired noisemakers are now operating at this site."

This is the first time such a large flock of birds has been affected in Syncrude's 30-year history, he said, adding the company estimates that 400 to 500 birds are affected.

Efforts to rescue the surviving birds are being hampered by ice around the pond's edges. There are also reports the ducks are diving to avoid humans who try to come near.

In statement released on Tuesday, Alberta Environment said: "Under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (EPEA), Alberta requires that Syncrude have a waterfowl protection plan in place that includes a comprehensive bird deterrent program for all tailings ponds.
 
"If Syncrude did not comply, the Alberta government will take action, with penalties up to $1 million."

Environment Canada has said it will work in conjunction with the provincial department.

Migratory birds are a federal responsibility, and Alberta Environment noted that hundreds of thousands of waterfowl pass through northeastern Alberta each spring and fall.

Alberta's Premier Ed Stelmach said he was concerned the company didn't report Monday's incident, noting the government found out about the incident from a tipster.

"If something has happened of this sort, then we feel that the company is obligated to report to the minister of the environment," he said. "It's a condition of the licence."

Oilsands under attack

Greenpeace Canada said Tuesday in a news release that this incident, is "yet another example of the deadly implications of Alberta's rampant tarsands development.

"The fact that this devastating incident wasn't reported by Syncrude begs the question of how many other incidents have been quietly covered up to safeguard their image," said spokesman Mike Hudema.

Environmentalists have been pushing for a moratorium on oilsands development for a number of reasons, such as:

  • The social impacts of rapid development
  • Harm to the northern boreal forest
  • The contribution of emissions caused by oilsands production to global warming and climate change

The waterfowl crisis comes as Ron Stevens, Alberta's deputy premier, is lobbying U.S. lawmakers to exclude the oilsands from a "dirty" oil law.

Stelmach decisively won re-election earlier this year and campaigned on a policy of letting the market decide the pace of oilsands development.

He has also committed his province to greenhouse gas reductions targets that many have criticized as inadequate and weak.

A week ago, protesters dropped from the ceiling at the annual premier's dinner.

"Stelmach, the best premier oil money can buy," read a large banner with a prominent Greenpeace logo. "Stop the tarsands!"

Stelmach told his audience that he would be travelling to Europe and southern California this year to sell the message that oilsands development is proceeding in a responsible way.

We cannot sit back and let others damage our reputation and give the world a false picture of Alberta," Stelmach said.

The Alberta Liberal party said the incident's timing is ironic, coming as Stelmach gets ready to launch a $25-million public relations campaign to improve the oilsands' image.

Please Add Comments( )

Zo
said
0 0

1 million dollars...that'll show em!!! What a Joke. Wait and see what the penalty is for failing to report...it's too bad our government and regulatory agencies are in the pockets of big business.


dan
said
0 0

Premier Stelmach is the best premier big oil can buy.


bobby
said
0 0

Hey! Survival of the fittest - and all that other Darwinian junk.


Terry
said
0 0

The Tarsands project is still in its infancy state, so Albertans and Canadians are just beginning to see these kinds of negative impacts. The book 'Stupid To The Last Drop' is a good read on this situation being created by this area of resource mismanagement.


JAMES
said
0 0

$25 million PR campaign???? Hope the oil companies are footing this tab???? There's go another excuse to raise the price of oil/gas and still show billions in profit!


neilx666
said
0 0

1 million dollars what is that??? No doubt they didn't want to report this, it would make them look "BAD"!This world is backwards and it's not gonna change anytime soon(unfortunately)!


GFB
said
0 0

Penalties of up to one million dollars do not do anything for a huge company such as Syncrud (sic). In order to have any effect, the penalties must actually affect their overall profit margin. Thus, a penalty of maybe 10-20 million dollars for a first offense that rises accordingly for EACH subsequent one is the only way to go. (And this will never happen in good ol' Alberta, where oil is king.)

Furthermore, the CEO of Syncrude, its senior management and their immediate families should be forced to not only publically apologise both on the airways and in writing, but also be forced to donate a very large sum of money out of their OWN pockets to both the Sierra Club and Greenpeace.

The punishment meted out must be both uncomfortable and embarrassing to Syncrude officials as well as make the company lose millions in revenue. I think this is the only way to maybe force them to come up with environmentally sound changes. But, I'm not holding my breath that this will ever happen. At the most, there will be aminor slap on the wrist and soon, similar environment catastrophes will occur.


Paul out West
said
0 0

Stupid humans, stupid times. All species suffer as a result of human greed, neglect and inaction by governments.


Hooray for the Tipster
said
0 0

Is it appropriate for the press to call this "The waterfowl crisis..." ? Hardly. Pardon the pun, but it looks like Syncrude tried to duck out of this one.
I especially like to hear that monitoring is only done in good weather... ahh but this is Syncrude and Alberta. Don't look don't see, don't tell... doesn't cut it with me. If the government and industry were serious about enforcing environmental laws we'd see the tipster get a fat reward ... but wait... that might encourage more reporting... Congrats tipster. Keep it up.


mark
said
0 0

Clearly a tragedy that the migratory waterfowl were caught-up in the tailings pond and it should have been prevented.

BUT...to all of you leftist 'ban the tarsands' crowd-perhaps you'd be happier sending in your emails, heating your homes, cooking your meals, driving your vehicles (or taking public transit), wearing your clothes, walking on streets made from what-fanciful ideas?

Like it or not, the world currently runs on oil. Until there is some other source (ever heard of ITER-ignored and lost by the Chretien government) sorry about the birds, but that's how it goes.


Marc Kobayashi
said
0 0

For those who claim that "God gave Alberta oil for the taking", I question if God had intended us to take it in such a reckless, disrespectful, and wasteful way.


Robert Gerard
said
0 0

Big Oil bankrolls the Tories and to a lesser extent the Liberals. Perhaps Albertans will not regain full control of their province, their government, their resources, until we bring in a law that excludes corporate bagmen from the process. Then, Stelmach might be able to afford to occasionally say no to the American oil companies that currently rule the province. Until then, all he can do is look like a bought-and-paid for tool mumbling platitudes as the environment suffers.


john
said
0 0

When Alberta becomes a desert, who will be responsible for that?


IT Manager in Calgary
said
0 0

More right wing coverups and failings in the name of the almighty dollar. This proves that the current Conservative government is unaccountable and irresponsible, and that big business truly rules Alberta. Oh well, it's nice to know that $telmach is spending $5 million of our tax dollars to do some typical Conservative spinning on the real story on the International stage.

The PCs have to go.

Pugfire
said
0 0

If YOU drive a motorized vehicle, YOU are part of the problem.
Admittedly we need cars etc, but we must be prepared to pay the costs associated with having them.


Len
said
0 0

Hey Stelmach, how about using that $25 million earmarked for Public Relations and splitting the funds between wildlife and environmental groups, where it might actually do some good.


David
said
0 0

Alberta seems to be doing well financially but at the expense of its land and waterways, and now the world's migrating wildlife. Some things should just not be for sale, including the soul of a province. There is a name for those who sell themselves. Shame to allow this to happen. We're beginning to look like eastern Europe's industrial sludge sites under the Communist government. We hire politicians to look out for us, our land, our heritage and our future generations. Get them to do their jobs or get them out if they are just wasting our time.


DJC
said
0 0

hold on everyone...tens of thousands of animals are killed every year on Alberta's roads or high voltage power lines. This is an unfortunate incident, but the sky is not falling. Syncrude will get fined, extra efforts will be deployed to ensure this once in 30 year incident does not repeat.


Benjamin Chappell
said
0 0

The impact of the oil sands on these animals and on the greater environment is something that must be taken very seriously. Regulations are needed to control the impact of development. I think it is also important to look at the other side, too. The oil sands are not evil, nor are the companies that develop them. People need oil and gas; there is demand for it for a reason. Let's face it, Canada's prosperity is hugely due to the development of natural resources, with oil and gas being one of the largest contributors. Many of our jobs and our livelihoods are dependent on development of areas like the oil sands. My point is this: we need to accept that there are going to be costs to the environment as we develop and prosper so try to look beyond short-term mishaps and think of the long-term benefits. At the same time, we need to make sure that the costs to the environment do not outweigh these economic benefits. This is a delicate balancing act and, unfortunately, many people are being polarized in their opinions.


alberta view
said
0 0

Travel to Alberta, home of the world`s largest toxic ponds, dirtiest oil and dirty politicians;we're also known as "the 51st state". Enjoy our polluted groundwater and high cancer/asthma rates while you`re here. The ducks are just the tip of the iceberg out here!


TH
said
0 0

Do you really think anyone cares about a few ducks the hunters would have gotten come fall. Please....this is not even news....


OK
said
0 0

Simple. If condition of licence was breached, as it was noting the lack of noise makers, then simply invalidate the licence and shut them down. Auction off the licence to another group who will 100% abide by the conditions of the contract. $1M per day fine would mean almost nothing to this multi-billion dollar organization. A total fine of $1M is grossly inadequate, especially sicen they apparently did not report a "reportable" violation. Syncrude, this is deplorable behviour!


Jay
said
0 0

This article is an open call for all hypocrites who drive cars, live in homes with furnaces, and who enjoy a stable economy in the west to come forward and complain about these firms that are mining the tarsands.


Yoyoma
said
0 0

Oh PULEEEASE!!! We're talking a few ducks here. Not a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Syncrude has been doing this for many years, has many ponds, and this happened now. I'd say that's a good record! The sudden thaw made it impossible to get to the pond on time. That's all, no story here.


Bill Duckworth
said
0 0

This just proves that a portion of the royalty income Alberta is now receiving should be used to educate ducks everywhere so they can be empowered to decide which ponds are for tailing, and which are safe.

Please join my organization, Education For Ducks (EFD) so we can lobby the government for duck education rights and funding.


JM
said
0 0

How many birds are killed in canadian citys each year? Oh my god stop the press! obviously not much going on in the world to report news on!


DGRose
said
0 0

Not surprised to see Greenpeace chasing after ambulances again... The tarsands are the way of the future, try doing something to make them better and improve all our lives as opposed to constantly crying foul and trying to shut them down.

As for Syncrude, if they dropped the ball then fine them and shame them publicly. Evidence of fraud? Produce it then act on it. Just spare us the environmental hysteria, figure out what happened, and concentrate on helping the critters by preventing a repeat of this.


Doug
said
0 0

I wonder if anyone has given any thought to what damage the toxic tailings ponds are going to cause in the future? Surely someone has planned ahead, while looking at the consequences (and costs) of the infamous Sydney Tar Ponds in Cape Breton.


T. GIroux
said
0 0

Blame it on bad weather for not having their preventative measures in place, what a pitiful, lame excuse.
I wonder how much has gone unreported because no "tipster" noticed.


JS
said
0 0

I guess the ducks didn't see or obey the " No Parking" signs. 400 to 500 less ducks for the hunters to shoot. Is CTV going to tally up how many ducks get shot by hunters this Fall? I don't think so!!!Is Greenpeace going to follow and complain about all the ducks the hunters shoot? I don't think so!!! Do the Greenpeaceniks drive a horse and buggy or do they drive cars and trucks that require "dirty oil from Alberta". I think it's the latter!!!


Dean
said
0 0

You people are so funny. Not a single one of you have ever been to the oilsands, you just take the typical "evil" rhetoric and run with it. Suncor and Syncrude don't set the price of oil. Neither do they buy it all. They don't get the 120 buck per barrel, refined oil doesn't come out of the ground, it comes out of a refinery. The crude here goes for just over half that price. These prices are set by the WORLD MARKET because it's GLOBAL COMMODITY. In essence, it's set by YOU, 'cause when there is a shortage, all of you complain. Also don't forget that new regulations and preparing for future regulation costs money, which they get from SELLING THEIR PRODUCT.

Our high prices at the pumps comes from taxes, because you all insist that to drive your 4WD SUVs on perfect roads.

If you live in a cave without fueulled heating, walk wherever you go, and hunt for your own food, complain away.

No I don't work for big oil, but over 70% of people employed by big oil don't even work in the oilfield industry.

Think before you talk


Evan in Athabasca
said
0 0

Do not forget the other industries that have tailing ponds such as gold extraction. I am sure you are wearing 1 piece of gold. Why is the gold industry not attacked for this same thing.



EE
said
0 0

Eastern Canadians kill a few seals and the world is up in arms. The oil industry pours polluted water out day in and day out...and where's the uproar?

Obviously, ducks simply are not cute enough to save...and the oil industry has more money than the fishery...


Mark
said
0 0

I would like to donate 500 Ducks and Geese from Toronto Island. Please give me an address to send them to.


Ben
said
0 0

1. When did the Aurora settling basin first see tailings?
2. Why was the implementation of noisemakers delayed?
3. Why was the tailings pond used without operational noisemakers?
4. Is deployment of noisemakers a seasonal (spring thaw) event?
5. Was the winter weather, and swift thaw before moisemakers could be deployed the true cause of the incident?
Syncrude definitely failed in operating a settling pond without first ensuring all conditions of use were satisfied (ie. noisemakers). But if weather played a role, then we have to look at whether Syncrude took every due diligence under the circumstances. The facts will come out, and it may be a little premature to call for the industry's head. Petro toxins exist in the oilsands, even in areas not currently mined - a huge area of Alberta is essentially covered in petrotoxins. Are there any figures for how many birds die from exposure to "natural" sources (ie. undisturbed bitumen)?


Matt
said
0 0

Okay, sure 1 mill isn't very much for a huge oil compamy like this... but it's ducks. Not thousands but a few hundred. Who cares? What percentage of the duck population is that? I bet it's a lot less than the percent of profit that one million is for the company.


NT
said
0 0

This is outrageous, 1 million dollars is a slap on the wrist. There has to be a better way to do this other than leaving open ponds of toxic chemicals behind. Those toxic chemicals will contaminate much more than a few hundred ducks, future generations will have to pay with their lives for contaminated soil, air and waterways.Whole ecosystems are being destroyed. I can't believe oil companies and governments can be so short-sighted.
Shameful.


Ricky Dock
said
0 0

One million divided by five hundred (counting on fingers) -- that's $2000 per duck.

That is insane.

Propane-powered noisemakers...let's see, we're protecting the ducks by increasing global warming, but couldn't get them installed because of global cooling, then the warming hit real fast....

What protects these stupid ducks during all the time they spend away from tailings ponds?

Should just post some hunters and have a nice side-business selling duck meat.


David
said
0 0

To those who claim "it's only a few ducks": to paraphrase the old saw of "It's the economy, stupid" -

"It's our unhealthy future, stupids"!

The ducks are just an overt indicator of what we will have to live (or die) with in the future.


dustin
said
0 0

The public needs to acknowledge the destructions our industries are causing.


Scott
said
0 0

It's sad that people like TH and Yoyoma typify the sheer ignorance that is rampant in Alberta. Of course nobody cares about the long term effects of the oilsands production as long as our vote-buying government is lining our pockets with money and lies disguised as promises. Sure, it's a few hundred ducks now... but until we have a responsible government that isn't being bought by big oil, this is just one of possibly hundreds, maybe thousands of breaches that will be quietly swept under the table while the ignorant voting masses continue to brag about how rich we are in Alberta. Why look to the future? why be worried about the pollution of groundwater in a landlocked province that will eventually have to IMPORT all of our drinking water? Why worry about the utter destruction of the boreal forest, which is currently the only thing making the air BREATHEABLE in the tarsand areas? Why be concerned about wildlife disappearing? After all, we're RICH, right?

And for all of the hypocrites who feel the incessant need to point out that we need to drive our vehicles - we didn't say that the oilsands production needs to be STOPPED, but it does need to be managed properly by the government, and unfortunately, the PCs have been BOUGHT and PAID FOR by big oil. Not every environmentally friendly political party is a threat to the vast riches that the right wing seems to be so proud of. But excuse the hell out of us for seeing the high COST of the high PROFIT that this insatiable greed is incurring.


Phillip McKay
said
0 0

When any company can say that it is the only incident in 30 years, then I say congratulations. Without Syncrude the gas at the pumps would be $3.00 a litre. I am not a shrieking environmentalist.
Go Syncrude. You are a good company supplying great jobs. Wish I had one.


Jason
said
0 0

The Tar Sands without question are the most filthy, pollution creating and toxic leftover producing project this planet has seen in a very long time. As bad as it is now, it will be considerably worse once the plants that are under construction are completed. Than it will be too late, there will be no stopping the environmental destruction caused by it and the Alberta Government will continue to sweep all of the devastation to this planet from it "under the carpet".


DilBerT
said
0 0

This is a Criminal Act
and these giants are well aware of what they hide under the premise
that this is an ongoing issue that is being presently addressed and resolved.

They know it's just a paper work excuse to appease the MOE.
(Ministry of the Enviorment)
I think a simple
1 Billion dollar fine
will resolve this issue
very quickly.

I've been there and have seen the facts that are hidden
from MOE by management,
working as an
Enviornmental Analyzer
Tech.working on water analyzers
used in a Refinery setting for over 25 years.

1 Billion will shake up these Managers I hope .







big picture
said
0 0

IF ONE COMPARES THE HISTORY OF EARTH, MAN'S LIFE IS BUT A PICTURE FRAME OF A MOVIE THAT LAST'S 36+ HOURS.
Before everyone has opinions please understand the process and the history and understand the benefits and where these companies have been and where they are going. Suncor and Syncrude are the pioneers in developing this great resource which is provided unprecedented wealth to Canada. For more than 20 years they have been trying various processes to better develop the oil sands as well provide the critical mass required to make these huge resources economically viable and profitable as to what is now, big news. They lost money for many years trying to develop the process, infrastructure and the many technical hurdles and achievements. The original process was to follow (syncrude) a giant sump, water clarification and treatment process with reclamation on a large time and Arial scale due to the size. This process involves removing the oil from the earth using warm water then discharging the earth and water to the giant sumps, the solids are allowed to settle in the big pits, the water is clarified similar to water treatment plants and clean water and settled earth is left behind. After this has been done then reclaiming the surface burden and replanting the forest can begin (similar to a drag line process in prairies). Disruption is fairly long (few decades) but in geological time it is nothing, remember the ice age lasted 10,000 years, reclamation will occur. This process has already been improved dramatically with separation and recycling of water at the plant using mechanical and chemical separation, thus not requiring huge pits to achieve separations. This will achieve significantly faster reclamation. There is a lot to it so it's easy to be critical without a complete understanding.
I would like to leave you with these thoughts.
-Canada is one of the few countries increasing oil production, it take at least 12 calories of energy in fertilizers and mechanical advantage to produce 1 calorie of food. We are already seeing food problems so I think we should not be greedy with our energy and supply Canada's “know how” to feed the world.
-So called big oil (private oil companies) are only supplying 11% of the world’s oil. They are not setting world oil prices.
-oil is an environmental benefit. Please think about it; The Economist a few years back came to the conclusion that the worst thing for the environment is war. To my first point, not having food promotes political instability hence war.
-Everyone that thinks alternative energy can replace oil in a few years is unrealistic. One solar panel supplies at best 100 watts with a life expectancy of 25 years. One gallon of diesel is equivalent of a solar panel working for ~65 days of sun light. For the same price of just a solar panel (only) diesel can give you 38 solar panel years instantly thus rapidly multiplying your work. Oil is still cheap, instant and efficient energy.
-Lastly the rapid price of oil has more to do with our governments than oil companies. We the people are being taxed heavily when buying gas directly. Direct 37%, then there is royalties income taxes incorporated into a barrel of crude. Then the real reason price of oil is going up is due to the 17% year over year increases in money supply or better known as inflation. The price per barrel in 1965 dollars is not that different now.
NOT SAYUNG WE SHOULD NOT CONSERVE AND DO THINGS BETTER, BUT THERE IS NO MAGIC TECHNOLOGY AVAILIABLE TODAY THAT CAN REPLACE THE TETRAWATTS WE ARE USING IN OIL TODAY. WE MUST CONTINUE TO PRODUCE UNTIL THAT DAY WHEN COLD FUSION OR HUGE ALTERNATIVE ENERGY INFASTRUCTURE COMES ALONG.



proud albertan
said
0 0

hey alberta view,
Maybe when they clean up the great lakes they can talk about our oil sands, If you don't like it here move. Where do you get your facts that we have higher cancer rates than any other province. And when you do move could you please take it calgary with you, he promised he would move when steady eddie was elected.


Stefanie
said
0 0

Maybe the $25M should be used to actually making the oil sands projects more environmentally responsible instead of boosting an image that is very true. Environment Canada should be policing, having heavier fines and shut downs for those not compliant. They have had a free ride for too long.


Mike Gabelmann
said
0 0

Corporations need to pay fines that actually are penalties.

As a citizen if I am fined $10,000 that translates into a percentage of my income. For most canadians this is about 25%. Scale this to a corporation and you will hurt them and make them think twice.


Don Dehammer
said
0 0

It is unfortunate for the ducks but in the grand scheme of things it is insignificant.

Greenpeace is losing more credibility every day as are the global warming alarmists.

Here is what has to happen in order to make the Green Peacers and global warming extremists happy:

- Stop using oil and destroy most world economies
- start "living off the land" as individuals and have 1/3 of the worlds population die due to starvation.
- grow our own fuel with biofuels and again destroy the environment and cause food shortages and kill more people (at least we won't use oil)

The list goes on and on so I really am hoping that we never live in that kind of "perfect world"

Just look at how many birds we saved in the world by banning DDT. Too bad about 90,000,000 humans died as a result over the last 30 years due to malaria. Go Greenies.


DJ
said
0 0

From alot of the comments, it seems the provincial conservative government is to blame for its direction on the tar sands. Very recently, the people of Alberta voted in this government in an overwhelming way. The other parties lost seats. I guess we can't say this government has lost touch with the people because the people have recently put them into power with these development plans. If you don't like the direction things are headed, then vote. Alberta did.


David
said
0 0

The U.S. Congress should repeal a provision that may block government fuel purchases from Alberta's oilsands, Senator Pete Domenici said.

The provision, known as Section 526, was part of energy legislation signed into law by President George W. Bush last December. It bars the U.S. from buying alternative fuels if the production creates more greenhouse gases than conventional fuels.
____________

The US seems to be a little more cognizant of the consequences of the oilsands than we are. Yet, the Alberta boys are down south doing everything in their power to get this repealed so they can continue to sell their swill.

Certainly, if we can get to the moon and walk about and do other wondrous things, we can surely come up with something that is less damaging, cleaner and more compatible with the earth than what we have now in Alberta's wastelands.


IT Manager from Edmonton
said
0 0

Listen, a human made a mistake and did not deploy the safety measures in time. I have been on site with Syncrude many times, and they bend over backwards to make the mine site safe for ALL, but something broke here so fix the problem so it does not happen again and leave it at that.

Syncrude will pay more than 1 million dollars in fines that's for sure, the PR damage is huge for them.

As far as the PC's they just won a majority, a huge majority to boot so anyone complaining here must have missed that the will of the people has been made clear with another mandate.

So it seems to me that the stupid armchair commies who hate the PC's are the ones that have to go since they are so out of touch with the majority of Albertans. It's called democracy people, I know commies hate it but it's what we have to work with.


Share with your social Network:

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Share this article with Facebook

Share this article with Digg

Share this article with Newsvine

Share this article with delicious

Share this article.
Send Email

Share this article with Twitter

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Share this article with Reddit

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz