News Sections
Hundreds of ducks die in oilsands tailings pond
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(52)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. Apr. 30 2008 2:44 PM ET
Fingers are being pointed after hundreds of ducks were found dead or dying in a toxic tailings pond belonging to oilsands giant Syncrude Canada Ltd.
CTV Edmonton's Joel Gotlib told Newsnet on Wednesday that it's the worst such incident in the history of northern Alberta's oilsands.
Environmentalists are furious, governments are demanding answers and Syncrude -- located about 40 kilometres north of Fort McMurray -- is scrambling to contain the damage, he said.
The tailings ponds are formed during the oilsands extraction process, Miles Kitagawa of the Alberta Toxics Watch Society told CTV.ca on Wednesday.
"Syncrude utilizes something called the Clark hot water process, where they crush bitumen-containing oil, mix it with heated water and use that to separate the bitumen out of the ore," he said.
The leftover water is dumped in the tailings ponds, which contain a mixture of clay, sand water and hydrocarbons, he said.
Drinking a glass of water from a tailings pond would be like drinking a diluted glass of oil or gasoline, Kitagawa said.
The ponds are supposed to have measures in place that keep migrating waterfowl from landing on the ponds, such as scarecrows and noisemakers.
In a news release issued Tuesday, Syncrude's president and CEO Tom Katinas said noisemakers had been deployed at all the company's other tailings ponds.
"However, due to the extreme winter weather conditions in the region last week, the deployment of these devices on the Aurora Settling Basin was delayed," he said.
"After the rapid weekend thaw, we were in the process of deploying the audible noisemakers on Monday, April 28th when this incident occurred. Eighteen propane-fired noisemakers are now operating at this site."
This is the first time such a large flock of birds has been affected in Syncrude's 30-year history, he said, adding the company estimates that 400 to 500 birds are affected.
Efforts to rescue the surviving birds are being hampered by ice around the pond's edges. There are also reports the ducks are diving to avoid humans who try to come near.
In statement released on Tuesday, Alberta Environment said: "Under the Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (EPEA), Alberta requires that Syncrude have a waterfowl protection plan in place that includes a comprehensive bird deterrent program for all tailings ponds.
"If Syncrude did not comply, the Alberta government will take action, with penalties up to $1 million."
Environment Canada has said it will work in conjunction with the provincial department.
Migratory birds are a federal responsibility, and Alberta Environment noted that hundreds of thousands of waterfowl pass through northeastern Alberta each spring and fall.
Alberta's Premier Ed Stelmach said he was concerned the company didn't report Monday's incident, noting the government found out about the incident from a tipster.
"If something has happened of this sort, then we feel that the company is obligated to report to the minister of the environment," he said. "It's a condition of the licence."
Oilsands under attack
Greenpeace Canada said Tuesday in a news release that this incident, is "yet another example of the deadly implications of Alberta's rampant tarsands development.
"The fact that this devastating incident wasn't reported by Syncrude begs the question of how many other incidents have been quietly covered up to safeguard their image," said spokesman Mike Hudema.
Environmentalists have been pushing for a moratorium on oilsands development for a number of reasons, such as:
- The social impacts of rapid development
- Harm to the northern boreal forest
- The contribution of emissions caused by oilsands production to global warming and climate change
The waterfowl crisis comes as Ron Stevens, Alberta's deputy premier, is lobbying U.S. lawmakers to exclude the oilsands from a "dirty" oil law.
Stelmach decisively won re-election earlier this year and campaigned on a policy of letting the market decide the pace of oilsands development.
He has also committed his province to greenhouse gas reductions targets that many have criticized as inadequate and weak.
A week ago, protesters dropped from the ceiling at the annual premier's dinner.
"Stelmach, the best premier oil money can buy," read a large banner with a prominent Greenpeace logo. "Stop the tarsands!"
Stelmach told his audience that he would be travelling to Europe and southern California this year to sell the message that oilsands development is proceeding in a responsible way.
We cannot sit back and let others damage our reputation and give the world a false picture of Alberta," Stelmach said.
The Alberta Liberal party said the incident's timing is ironic, coming as Stelmach gets ready to launch a $25-million public relations campaign to improve the oilsands' image.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(52)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Please Add Comments( )
Zo
0
said
0
dan
0
said
0
bobby
0
said
0
Terry
0
said
0
JAMES
0
said
0
neilx666
0
said
0
GFB
0
said
0
Furthermore, the CEO of Syncrude, its senior management and their immediate families should be forced to not only publically apologise both on the airways and in writing, but also be forced to donate a very large sum of money out of their OWN pockets to both the Sierra Club and Greenpeace.
The punishment meted out must be both uncomfortable and embarrassing to Syncrude officials as well as make the company lose millions in revenue. I think this is the only way to maybe force them to come up with environmentally sound changes. But, I'm not holding my breath that this will ever happen. At the most, there will be aminor slap on the wrist and soon, similar environment catastrophes will occur.
Paul out West
0
said
0
Hooray for the Tipster
0
said
0
I especially like to hear that monitoring is only done in good weather... ahh but this is Syncrude and Alberta. Don't look don't see, don't tell... doesn't cut it with me. If the government and industry were serious about enforcing environmental laws we'd see the tipster get a fat reward ... but wait... that might encourage more reporting... Congrats tipster. Keep it up.
mark
0
said
0
BUT...to all of you leftist 'ban the tarsands' crowd-perhaps you'd be happier sending in your emails, heating your homes, cooking your meals, driving your vehicles (or taking public transit), wearing your clothes, walking on streets made from what-fanciful ideas?
Like it or not, the world currently runs on oil. Until there is some other source (ever heard of ITER-ignored and lost by the Chretien government) sorry about the birds, but that's how it goes.
Marc Kobayashi
0
said
0
Robert Gerard
0
said
0
john
0
said
0
IT Manager in Calgary
0
said
0
The PCs have to go.
Pugfire
0
said
0
Admittedly we need cars etc, but we must be prepared to pay the costs associated with having them.
Len
0
said
0
David
0
said
0
DJC
0
said
0
Benjamin Chappell
0
said
0
alberta view
0
said
0
TH
0
said
0
OK
0
said
0
Jay
0
said
0
Yoyoma
0
said
0
Bill Duckworth
0
said
0
Please join my organization, Education For Ducks (EFD) so we can lobby the government for duck education rights and funding.
JM
0
said
0
DGRose
0
said
0
As for Syncrude, if they dropped the ball then fine them and shame them publicly. Evidence of fraud? Produce it then act on it. Just spare us the environmental hysteria, figure out what happened, and concentrate on helping the critters by preventing a repeat of this.
Doug
0
said
0
T. GIroux
0
said
0
I wonder how much has gone unreported because no "tipster" noticed.
JS
0
said
0
Dean
0
said
0
Our high prices at the pumps comes from taxes, because you all insist that to drive your 4WD SUVs on perfect roads.
If you live in a cave without fueulled heating, walk wherever you go, and hunt for your own food, complain away.
No I don't work for big oil, but over 70% of people employed by big oil don't even work in the oilfield industry.
Think before you talk
Evan in Athabasca
0
said
0
EE
0
said
0
Obviously, ducks simply are not cute enough to save...and the oil industry has more money than the fishery...
Mark
0
said
0
Ben
0
said
0
2. Why was the implementation of noisemakers delayed?
3. Why was the tailings pond used without operational noisemakers?
4. Is deployment of noisemakers a seasonal (spring thaw) event?
5. Was the winter weather, and swift thaw before moisemakers could be deployed the true cause of the incident?
Syncrude definitely failed in operating a settling pond without first ensuring all conditions of use were satisfied (ie. noisemakers). But if weather played a role, then we have to look at whether Syncrude took every due diligence under the circumstances. The facts will come out, and it may be a little premature to call for the industry's head. Petro toxins exist in the oilsands, even in areas not currently mined - a huge area of Alberta is essentially covered in petrotoxins. Are there any figures for how many birds die from exposure to "natural" sources (ie. undisturbed bitumen)?
Matt
0
said
0
NT
0
said
0
Shameful.
Ricky Dock
0
said
0
That is insane.
Propane-powered noisemakers...let's see, we're protecting the ducks by increasing global warming, but couldn't get them installed because of global cooling, then the warming hit real fast....
What protects these stupid ducks during all the time they spend away from tailings ponds?
Should just post some hunters and have a nice side-business selling duck meat.
David
0
said
0
"It's our unhealthy future, stupids"!
The ducks are just an overt indicator of what we will have to live (or die) with in the future.
dustin
0
said
0
Scott
0
said
0
And for all of the hypocrites who feel the incessant need to point out that we need to drive our vehicles - we didn't say that the oilsands production needs to be STOPPED, but it does need to be managed properly by the government, and unfortunately, the PCs have been BOUGHT and PAID FOR by big oil. Not every environmentally friendly political party is a threat to the vast riches that the right wing seems to be so proud of. But excuse the hell out of us for seeing the high COST of the high PROFIT that this insatiable greed is incurring.
Phillip McKay
0
said
0
Go Syncrude. You are a good company supplying great jobs. Wish I had one.
Jason
0
said
0
DilBerT
0
said
0
and these giants are well aware of what they hide under the premise
that this is an ongoing issue that is being presently addressed and resolved.
They know it's just a paper work excuse to appease the MOE.
(Ministry of the Enviorment)
I think a simple
1 Billion dollar fine
will resolve this issue
very quickly.
I've been there and have seen the facts that are hidden
from MOE by management,
working as an
Enviornmental Analyzer
Tech.working on water analyzers
used in a Refinery setting for over 25 years.
1 Billion will shake up these Managers I hope .
big picture
0
said
0
Before everyone has opinions please understand the process and the history and understand the benefits and where these companies have been and where they are going. Suncor and Syncrude are the pioneers in developing this great resource which is provided unprecedented wealth to Canada. For more than 20 years they have been trying various processes to better develop the oil sands as well provide the critical mass required to make these huge resources economically viable and profitable as to what is now, big news. They lost money for many years trying to develop the process, infrastructure and the many technical hurdles and achievements. The original process was to follow (syncrude) a giant sump, water clarification and treatment process with reclamation on a large time and Arial scale due to the size. This process involves removing the oil from the earth using warm water then discharging the earth and water to the giant sumps, the solids are allowed to settle in the big pits, the water is clarified similar to water treatment plants and clean water and settled earth is left behind. After this has been done then reclaiming the surface burden and replanting the forest can begin (similar to a drag line process in prairies). Disruption is fairly long (few decades) but in geological time it is nothing, remember the ice age lasted 10,000 years, reclamation will occur. This process has already been improved dramatically with separation and recycling of water at the plant using mechanical and chemical separation, thus not requiring huge pits to achieve separations. This will achieve significantly faster reclamation. There is a lot to it so it's easy to be critical without a complete understanding.
I would like to leave you with these thoughts.
-Canada is one of the few countries increasing oil production, it take at least 12 calories of energy in fertilizers and mechanical advantage to produce 1 calorie of food. We are already seeing food problems so I think we should not be greedy with our energy and supply Canada's “know how” to feed the world.
-So called big oil (private oil companies) are only supplying 11% of the world’s oil. They are not setting world oil prices.
-oil is an environmental benefit. Please think about it; The Economist a few years back came to the conclusion that the worst thing for the environment is war. To my first point, not having food promotes political instability hence war.
-Everyone that thinks alternative energy can replace oil in a few years is unrealistic. One solar panel supplies at best 100 watts with a life expectancy of 25 years. One gallon of diesel is equivalent of a solar panel working for ~65 days of sun light. For the same price of just a solar panel (only) diesel can give you 38 solar panel years instantly thus rapidly multiplying your work. Oil is still cheap, instant and efficient energy.
-Lastly the rapid price of oil has more to do with our governments than oil companies. We the people are being taxed heavily when buying gas directly. Direct 37%, then there is royalties income taxes incorporated into a barrel of crude. Then the real reason price of oil is going up is due to the 17% year over year increases in money supply or better known as inflation. The price per barrel in 1965 dollars is not that different now.
NOT SAYUNG WE SHOULD NOT CONSERVE AND DO THINGS BETTER, BUT THERE IS NO MAGIC TECHNOLOGY AVAILIABLE TODAY THAT CAN REPLACE THE TETRAWATTS WE ARE USING IN OIL TODAY. WE MUST CONTINUE TO PRODUCE UNTIL THAT DAY WHEN COLD FUSION OR HUGE ALTERNATIVE ENERGY INFASTRUCTURE COMES ALONG.
proud albertan
0
said
0
Maybe when they clean up the great lakes they can talk about our oil sands, If you don't like it here move. Where do you get your facts that we have higher cancer rates than any other province. And when you do move could you please take it calgary with you, he promised he would move when steady eddie was elected.
Stefanie
0
said
0
Mike Gabelmann
0
said
0
As a citizen if I am fined $10,000 that translates into a percentage of my income. For most canadians this is about 25%. Scale this to a corporation and you will hurt them and make them think twice.
Don Dehammer
0
said
0
Greenpeace is losing more credibility every day as are the global warming alarmists.
Here is what has to happen in order to make the Green Peacers and global warming extremists happy:
- Stop using oil and destroy most world economies
- start "living off the land" as individuals and have 1/3 of the worlds population die due to starvation.
- grow our own fuel with biofuels and again destroy the environment and cause food shortages and kill more people (at least we won't use oil)
The list goes on and on so I really am hoping that we never live in that kind of "perfect world"
Just look at how many birds we saved in the world by banning DDT. Too bad about 90,000,000 humans died as a result over the last 30 years due to malaria. Go Greenies.
DJ
0
said
0
David
0
said
0
The provision, known as Section 526, was part of energy legislation signed into law by President George W. Bush last December. It bars the U.S. from buying alternative fuels if the production creates more greenhouse gases than conventional fuels.
____________
The US seems to be a little more cognizant of the consequences of the oilsands than we are. Yet, the Alberta boys are down south doing everything in their power to get this repealed so they can continue to sell their swill.
Certainly, if we can get to the moon and walk about and do other wondrous things, we can surely come up with something that is less damaging, cleaner and more compatible with the earth than what we have now in Alberta's wastelands.
IT Manager from Edmonton
0
said
0
Syncrude will pay more than 1 million dollars in fines that's for sure, the PR damage is huge for them.
As far as the PC's they just won a majority, a huge majority to boot so anyone complaining here must have missed that the will of the people has been made clear with another mandate.
So it seems to me that the stupid armchair commies who hate the PC's are the ones that have to go since they are so out of touch with the majority of Albertans. It's called democracy people, I know commies hate it but it's what we have to work with.