Health -
News Sections
Major retailers pull bottles containing bisphenol A
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(43)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Apr. 15 2008 9:43 PM ET
Major retailers including the Hudson's Bay Company announced Tuesday they're pulling products containing bisphenol A from their shelves, ahead of a possible announcement from Health Canada that the chemical is "dangerous."
Health Canada has not confirmed whether it will make such an announcement, but a report in The Globe and Mail claims the agency could make a decision on the chemical's safety as early as Wednesday.
Hudson's Bay, which includes both the Bay and Zellers stores, announced it will no longer sell products like baby bottles that contain bisphenol A.
Canadian Tire Corporation has said it will do the same, along with Forzani Group, which operates Sport Chek, Athlete's World and Coast Mountain Sports.
Other major retailers like Lululemon Athletica and Mountain Equipment Co-op had already removed the products.
Health Canada spokesman Paul Duchesne confirmed to CTV.ca that bisphenol A is being reviewed by the federal government's Chemicals Management Plan, which, among other mandates, is reviewing chemicals that have been identified as possible hazards to both humans and the environment.
He said that, according to a timetable set for the investigation into potentially hazardous chemicals, an announcement about the findings for bisphenol A was not scheduled to occur until either late spring or mid summer, depending on what the investigation finds.
If researchers don't like what they find out about bisphenol A, it could pave the way for it to be labelled as toxic under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.
This would lead to strict regulations governing the chemical's use.
Bisphenol A, or BPA as it's commonly known, is a synthetic chemical that is the main component in polycarbonate, the common, shatter-proof plastic that is used in food and drink containers. It is also used in everyday household items, from CDs to electronic products to baby bottles.
According to The Globe, Health Canada would be the first government agency from anywhere in the world to attempt to regulate BPA.
"I think if the government proceeds that's certainly a very important development and I think it would be an international precedent," Aaron Freeman, a policy director at Environmental Defence, told CTV's Canada AM. "
"This would place Canada as the first country to regulate bisphenol A. So it would really be a huge step in protecting human health from what we're seeing is a very risky, toxic chemical."
The move comes on the heels of growing public concern about the chemical's health risks. American studies have shown that most people test positive for trace amounts of BPA, which mimics the hormone estrogen.
Environmental Defence, an environmental advocacy group, has lobbied for the regulation of bisphenol A. Freeman said that the chemical has been linked to a variety of health problems.
"There are over 150 peer-reviewed studies that show that bisphenol A is linked to breast cancer, to attention deficit disorder, to obesity and a whole host of developmental problems," Freeman said.
"And what that means is because it's an endocrine disruptor, it interferes with the natural developmental processes in the human body."
The chemical can leach out of food containers when they are heated or put in the dishwasher.
In the meantime, Freeman said that consumers can take some steps to avoid bisphenol A.
Consumers can opt for baby bottles that don't contain bisphenol A, including glass bottles. And there are plenty of metal water bottles, including stainless-steel versions, on the market.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(43)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
Rene
said
Concerned parent
said
Doug Cottrell
said
Eileen25
said
John
said
Ann
said
PBW
said
Glass is now, and was, eminently recyclable. Given the improvement in optical inspection machines since the 1960's, we should no longer see glass bottles exploding because of a minor bump, as weak bottles would be more easily removed from production lines.
Let's face it, the move to plastic was simply because it was "more convenient", ie, more convenient for the manufacturers, as they no longer had to be concerned about bottle returns, sterilization etc. In other words, it was a way of boosting the bottom line.
Canadians should look at the history books and find out how those in occupied Europe reduced, re-used and recycled during the Second World War. There are many examples that could be used to reduce our dependency on single-use items like polycarbonate water bottles. Who needs bottled water anyway? In most cases it is municipal water that has had impurities and the bacteria-fighting chlorine - removed and then sold at ridiculously high prices. Even the old saw about "eight eight ounce glasses per day" no longer seems to be true.
Kudos to the government for seeing the problem and acting on it. My only concern is that the sixty days will be taken up with manufacturers buying votes from MP's and civil servants in an effort to keep a known carcinogen in the food chain.
Sue Comstock
said
Stephanie
said
KTG
said
I find Canada's parental approach to our health and safety extremely patronizing, and I believe it puts our health at greater risk. I would certainly appreciate the regulation of bpa, but think it is unfortunate that Canada doesn't give it's citizens the information they need and deserve to make their own informed choices. We are kept in the dark rather than communicated to like adults. Most Canadians understand probability and can compute the risks, and then decide if they are worth it. Bungee jumping is still a sport, after all. These findings on bpa aren't suddenly 'new' - this information has been around for many years, but only recently picked up by the mainstream. Now paternal Canada thinks everyone would be a little bit safer if bpa was regulated?? Sure! You bet it'll make Health Canada look progressive! And guaranteeeeed they will permit some level of tolerance. There are so many other chemicals like bpa that Canadian regulators feel are not 'worth' mentioning or regulating, or only regulate 'optimally' (read: most benefits with least deaths). But you just can't regulate all the hazards out there - it wouldn't be safe to leave the house and it wouldn't be safe to sit there either! If 'new' information or public outcry is the only way Canada will take affirmative action or openly discuss a hazardous product, then I believe to wait for the regulators decisions will be putting our health in jeopardy. We can't expect full disclosure, and we can't expect 100% compliance. Canadians need to be proactive, do their research, and pressure the government to make information about hazardous products common knowledge - more available and accessible. Really, all it takes is a label, and all you have to do is read it. The governments responsibility is to let its' people know, not to live our lives and make our decisions for us!
(and I am in support of these regulations, it's just the principle of the thing...)
Jon
said
Anubis114
said
Water bottles, pop bottles, tupperware, etc is not food safe! When anything hot is put in them, or they are heated up, say in a microwave, then the toxins leech out into the food/drink.
This is long overdue.
Seter Povern
said
Rather than what we are doing today...
But Hurray for health Canada, it only took them 10 years after initial studies pointed that BPA is dangerous!
Michele
said
Kelly Keen
said
Maybe the Feds should send out a public awareness flyer. These flyers would likely be better use of Canadian funds than the flyers sent out promoting the federal Conservatives, and paid with Canadian public funds.
DP
said
How about the items that say "microwave safe". As opposed to older itmes that will warp in the microwave or dishwasher.
Tori
said
Health Canada needs a huge pat on the back, I hope they don't back down and have this label in effect immediately.
That all being said, how do we know, from what has been in our cupboards probably for years, what needs to be thrown away and what does not?
Maybe this is why there are so many cases of Cancer right now. Close to 200,000 Canadians will be diagnosed in 2008. That is scary.
Chris L
said
Secondary questions might be... Does the age of the plastic affect it? What about colour, UV exposure, additives, food types, method of heating, the body's ability to remove BPA through kidneys and liver, et cetera.
If polycarbonate plastic is the only affected plastic, then acrylic plastic is safe. At least, it's safe until the next leaching chemical is discovered.
Mario
said
amcd
said
Paul
said
There is also so much remaining to do. I took a long list of known carcinogenic chemicals (available on various cancer websites) with me at a store and looked at various products from shampoo to food. It was almost impossible to find one which did not have at least one of the carcinogenic products present on the label! Really scary! And why not make compulsory to display on the labels when products contain transgenic grains so that we have a buying choice? Mighty $ at work!
I am quite conscious about all this as my 21 year old daughter has an agressive form of cancer.
foley
said
SN
said
For anyone worried about baby bottles and sippy cups, I found some that are Recyclable #5 (the number on the bottom of the product inside a triangle). Fives are safe to use and are BPA-free. But it's probably a good idea to avoid prolonged exposure to high heat (as it would be with most any plastic product anyway).
JennS.
said
further, there are many suitable alternatives to BPA - Born Free baby bottles, and Camel Back's new water bottle line are both BPA free. As are all the bottles that come with the Mendela Breast Pumps. As a consumer we need to do the research and make the choice that is best for us.
Feeling Guilty
said
Mike
said
Manufacturers should take responsibility and halt all shipments of affected products. First it was lead paint on our children's toys, now this!!
M
said
Anthony
said
Ihidaya
said
Laly
said
Nancy
said
Science Geek
said
It takes a lot of time and money to determine if something is good or not and its great that health Canada has done this.
So for the people who are thinking that this has led to ADHD, Diabetes, and other various diseases, SHUT UP. Learn what it is. If it is truly dangerous than it is a carcinogen. Which means it will cause cancer, and will take a LONG time to develop symptoms. That is why this investigation took so long. Cancer just doesn't appear it starts slowly and then when it finally gets big enough people notice.
People, please don't assume anything when it comes to studies. Investigate yourself and inform yourself before you come to absurd conclusions. I know everyone in the science world hates when this happens and is for sure a huge pet peeve. I know its one of my largest ones.
FYI
said
What is important as consumers is to read labels, and use products as they were intended to be used. Dishwashersafe and foodsafe products have an international symbol stamped on them (a cup and fork logo) to indicate they are safe to clean in high temp dishwahsers...all others should be hand washed, and plastic packaging (yogurt containers...etc) used single use only for food that they originally packaged. Plastics that can be safely reheated/heated in a microwave have an international symbol on them (stacked wavey lines) or instructions for use in a micorwave stamped on them...any other plastic should not be used in a microwave.
Please don't jump on the hysteria bandwagon...get informed.
Susan Patteri
said
Roger T
said
If it's not banned it's boycott, if it's not boycott always another issue.
foley
said
Sembree
said
And to Science Geek
This isn't an all of a sudden outcry against the science. Hemlock was used medicinally for hundreds of years. Science of the time said it was safe in some uses. Well Science proved it wasn't good at all. Scientists of today of course will say not to panic its only bad in some cases. What will the Scientists of tomorrow say?
Sorry Geek, I don't want any of it. And this isn't a band wagon. Many of us do not need a degree to see whats happening or put two and two together. Say what you want about the science, the outcry speaks for itself.
Sandra
said
sash
said
we need to move in the same directions the EU has.. with the the move to resinate all chemical harmfull until proven safe..
and not this method we use now, safe until proven otherwise..
I would prefer to use glass container. and back to wax sprayed cans and cartons.. then the use of plastics.. If we can taste the plastic in the food and fluids we drink, it certainly not healthy for us no matter what someone tell you, that just common sense.. especial when to take in consideration the rising rates of cancer asthma and other allergies.. since all of these are caused mostly due to environmental factors
L from PEI
said
Annoyed
said
Daniel
said
Trudy Godreau
said
They should let us return our bottles for BPA free ones. It's not fair we have to spend MORE MONEY on new ones.