Politics -
News Sections
Controversial immigration bill survives key vote
CTV News Video
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Font-size:
Share
Print
Comments(23)
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. Apr. 9 2008 10:46 PM ET
The Conservative government's new immigration legislation has survived a key vote, despite an attempt by the New Democrats to block the controversial reforms.
MPs in the House of Commons on Wednesday voted 201-68 against the NDP motion that strove to block the Conservative budget implementation bill, which contains the new legislation.
New Democrat and Bloc Quebecois MPs supported the confidence motion, while Conservatives and Liberals opposed it. An election would have been triggered if the motion had passed.
Though the Liberals have slammed the reforms, calling them regressive and designed to attack immigrants, they were not expected to vote against them. But they have not ruled out doing so in future, as the budget bill is expected to face several more confidence votes, each of which could bring down the government.
The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act would give the government discretion to pick and choose which applicants to fast track or block.
Immigration Minister Diane Finley said the Conservatives have worked hard to come up with a solution to the "mess" she said was created by the Liberals, and there is little room for negotiation.
"I can stand hand on heart and say this is good for immigrants, good for business, good for newcomers to the country and it's certainly good for the country," Finley told CTV's Mike Duffy Live on Wednesday.
She said the Conservatives are willing to go to the polls over the bill, and will not consider amendments expected to be proposed by the NDP.
Under the current immigration system there is a waiting list of close to one million applicants -- with no way of fast-tracking those with skills that Canada needs, Finley said.
"If that person is number 600,000 in line we've got a lot of applications to get through before that," Finley said, noting that those highly-skilled applicants often give up on Canada because the backlog has been so long in recent years.
The proposed changes would allow the minister to speed up the process for applicants whose skills are in demand. However, opponents warn that shift could open the door to legislated discrimination.
During question period in the House of Commons on Wednesday, Liberal Leader Stephane Dion asked Prime Minister Stephen Harper to admit the reforms would do nothing to reduce the massive backlog of applicants and would discourage potential immigrants from applying.
Harper shot back, attacking the Liberals' record on immigration.
"The Liberal party, Mr. Speaker, wants to go back to what they consider the good old days. The good old days where backlogs just kept getting longer, where you needed special access to government members, where frankly Mr. Speaker, they gave priority to strippers in terms of immigration policies and where after waiting for six years they charged immigrants $1,000 to come to Canada."
Harper was referring to the scandal that erupted in 2004 when it was revealed then Liberal immigration minister Judy Sgro had fast-tracked the immigration process for a campaign volunteer -- who also happened to be an exotic dancer from Romania
Ahead of the vote, Liberal immigration critic Maurizio Bevilacqua said the party has no interest in rejecting the bill before it even gets to committee, and Canadians should have a chance to weigh in on the proposals.
Bevilacqua didn't rule out the possibility of voting against the reforms at a later date, however.
Meanwhile, more than a dozen immigrant groups planned to protest the proposed changes on Wednesday in Toronto.
Sima Sahar Zerehi of the group Status Now, told Mike Duffy Live that the reforms could provide a framework for discrimination against visible minorities.
NDP immigration critic Olivia Chow acknowledged the system needs to be overhauled. But she argues that the proposed changes are undemocratic and would give the unfettered power to Finley to choose who gets fast-tracked, without any parliamentary involvement.
User Tools
Related Stories
User Tools
About the tools
Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.
-


Font-size
Print Article
Comments(23)-
Feedback
Share it with your network of friends
Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I applaud the budget, even though Health Care and education may stay unscathed. Sadly this cannot last and I worry to later this year where cuts will become enviable. If anything, this provides the Wildrose Alliance plenty of ammo when an election is called.


Comments are now closed for this story
david
said
Do they think Canadians are stupid? What kind of opposition is this?
Can we imagine what they would act like if they formed a government?
Francesco
said
mac
said
Didn't think so.
IT Manager
said
David Trydal
said
Jeff S.
said
Their hypocrisy knows no limits.
Ponyboy
said
ance
said
They didn't properly discipline their Sask MP for his hateful, drunken, anti-gay diatribe.
They are implementing legislation where immigrants could be allowed or disallowed at the sole discretion of the immigration minister regardless of their legitimate refugee status.
The gave gun owners
back tens of millions of dollars in legally collected fees after pleading poverty and scraping programs for female victims of violence.
Give your head a shake Grits...even your solid support base of those who truly abhor the bitter, exclusionary, narrow-minded Conservative way might eventually dump you due to your lack of action.
Mikey
said
Julius
said
Ry
said
And for reference, these all wielding "powers" that critics are speaking of that will be reposed in any future Minister, are only exercised on the advice of Crown servants. With millions of applicants either through refugee, citizenship or PR status, are Canadian's that indulged to believe that a minister of the Crown would be so granularly involved in cases before their department? These powers are delegated to bureaucrats and rarely ever personally executed by the Crown itself.
Re-take Grade 7 History/Civics. Understand your Government!
Robinhood
said
Andy In Cambridge
said
this lets them choose the ones that have skills to offer Canada, before they get sick of waiting and go to another country.
Immigrants contribute to our economy, but they can't contribute if we can't let them in
Brenda from the prairies
said
Mike
said
WW
said
Dean
said
Chris
said
Go Harper take it to them Lib's who need to shut their lid!
Brad B
said
Pro Sanity
said
Tim
said
Sumimus
said
Vince M.
said
And it is a fraud on Canada for someone to come here with no ability or intention to contribute to the bottom line.